DOCSLIB.ORG

Renewable Energy Projects in Development !( City Yreka D E L N O R T E !( C O U N T Y

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Renewable Energy Projects in Development !( City Yreka D E L N O R T E !( C O U N T Y A B C D E F G H I J California 2 ¨¦§5 ¤£101 Crescent Renewable Energy Projects in Development !( City Yreka D e l N o r t e !( C o u n t y S i s k i y o u M o d o c with Existing and Approved Transmission Lines C o u n t y C o u n t y Alturas !( Updated 12/17/2015 Prepared by the California Energy Commission ¤£395 3 Renewable Energy Projects Approved Transmission Projects in Development CAISO Approved Project New Line S h a s t a H u m b o l d t C o u n t y Eureka C o u n t y Biomass/ Solar PV !( (! IID Approved Project New Line L a s s e n !( C o u n t y Landfill Gas 1 - 20 MW Weaverville IID Approved Project Increased Voltage !( (! Geothermal (! 21 - 200 MW ¨¦§5 ! ( Small Hydro (! 201 - 2,400 MW LADWP Approved Project New Line 101 Redding !( ¤£ T r i n i t y !( (! C o u n t y Wind Other Features (! Solar Thermal (! Susanville City !( )" Existing Transmission Line Existing Substation* )" 4 Red Approved Substation* Bluff 345 - 500kV !( Road Te h a m a C o u n t y 200 - 287kV County Boundary ¤£395 110 - 161kV Desert Renewable Energy Quincy !( P l u m a s * NOTE: Only substations for approved C o u n t y Conservation Plan Boundary B u t t e transmission lines shown on map ÆÄ99 C o u n t y Chico !( G l e n n C o u n t y S i e r r a Downieville C o u n t y Willows !( 101 !( Oroville ¤£ !( M e n d o c i n o C o u n t y 5 Yu b a N e v a d a C o u n t y C o u n t y ¨¦§80 !( Nevada City !( L a k e Colusa !( C o u n t y !( Ukiah C o l u s a Yuba !( C o u n t y !( City Marysville !( !( !( P l a c e r C o u n t y Lakeport !( ¨¦§5 S u t t e r C o u n t y !( Auburn !(!( !( Yo l o 99 80 ÆÄ Roseville ¨¦§ C o u n t y !( Placerville £50 !( ¤ Woodland E l D o r a d o Markleeville !( !( 5 C o u n t y N a p a ¨¦§ A l p i n e CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION C o u n t y 505 Sacramento 6 S o n o m a ¨¦§ !( C o u n t y C o u n t y Santa S a c r a m e n t o Rosa 80 A m a d o r !( ¨¦§ C o u n t y C o u n t y ¤£395 S o l a n o C o u n t y !( Jackson Napa !( !( Fairfield C a l a v e r a s Bridgeport !( !( M a r i n San C o u n t y C o u n t y !( Andreas !( !( 5 T u o l u m n e 101 ¤£ ¨¦§ C o u n t y S a n J o a q u i n M o n o San Martinez !( C o u n t y C o u n t y Rafael 80 )"Contra Costa Power Lee !( )" Bellota Sonora ¨¦§ C o n t r a C o s t a B Stockton e !( Vining ll C S !( o !( C o u n t y o t o a 680 n u U t - r t ¨¦§ p a h W g C o a r f a o r d s n e t e Windmaster a 99 r San v ÆÄ i l Francisco!( Oakland Ralph le !( )")" U ))" p S a n F r a n c i s c o Kelso g r Warnerville a C o u n t y Delta Pumps d 7 Tesla e " )" ) 580 Las Positas)" !(!( £395 § e 5 ¤ ¨¦ d a § Modesto r ¨¦ 880 pg !( !( U M a r i p o s a § ta ¨¦ s o Fremont C C o u n t y a S t a n i s l a u s !( tr A l a m e d a Redwood on f C C o u n t y 280 City o C o u n t y !( )" th Mariposa ¨¦§ u So !( !( 101 M a d e r a ¤£ Bishop San Jose C o u n t y !( !( Merced S a n M a t e o S a n t a C l a r a !( Wilson C o u n t y )" C o u n t y M e r c e d Wilson - Le Grand Upgrade C o u n t y )"Le Grand S a n t a C r u z C o u n t y Santa Cruz !( Madera ¨¦§5 !( Borden)" 8 395 Hollister Borden - Gregg Upgrade Gregg ¤£ !( )" Independence !( Fresno !( Mendota !( V Salinas k I n y o !( 0 3 C o u n t y 2 g Monterey g e 99 !( r G ÆÄ - s e t S a n B e n i t o a Harry Allen !( G )" C o u n t y F r e s n o Soledad C o u n t y !( M o n t e r e y Hanford Visalia !( C o u n t y Lemoore !( !( T u l a r e Tulare C o u n t y !( Coalinga 101 V ¤£ !( k )" 0 Gates 0 5 Porterville n 9 e K i n g s !( ll A y C o u n t y r Avenal r !( a !( H - o d a r o ld Earlimart E !( )" do Eldorado ra do El - ah np va I 5 ¨¦§ Ridgecrest !( Wasco )"Ivanpah !( !( !( Renewable Energy Projects in Development Atascadero 99 15 !( S a n L u i s O b i s p o ÆÄ ¨¦§ 12/17/2015 C o u n t y K e r n C o u n t y )"Midway Bakersfield )" !( Name Type Status MW Grid Carrizo San Luis 2275 Hattesen (Pristine Sun) Solar PV In review 2.0 D-9 Obispo Addison Energy Wind Wind Approved 120.0 F-10 !( Adera Solar Solar PV Approved-On Hold 20.0 D-8 !( )" Barren Ridge Aeromen Solar Solar PV Application Filed 35.0 F-10 !( 10 Agincourt Solar Solar PV Under Construction 10.0 G-11 Alta East Wind Wind Approved 153.0 F-10 Tehachapi!( Altamont Solar Energy Center Solar PV Approved-On Hold 10.0 C-7 !( !( American Solar Solar PV Approved 35.0 F-11 !( Mojave Antelope Big Sky Solar Project Solar PV Approved 20.0 F-11 !( !(!( !( V Antelope Solar Solar PV Approved 52.0 F-11 )" k 0 Sandlot Santa Windhub 3 )" Antelope Valley Solar Solar PV Approved 7.5 F-10 2 e Needles Aries Solar Holdings Solar PV Approved 27.0 F-11 Maria g !( !( d 40 !( !( !(i i Barstow p R ¨¦§ Aspiration G Solar PV In Review 9.0 D-8 a !( h n Coolwater c e !( a r Astoria Solar Solar PV Approved 175.0 E-10 h r S a n t a B a r b a r a Te a )" Aurora Solar Solar PV In review 20.0 D-9 B 395 C o u n t y ¤£ 40 Aurora Solar LLC Solar PV Approved 20.0 F-11 )" ¨¦§ )" Avalon Wind Approved 300.0 F-10 Pisgah Whirlwind 15 Avenida Del Sol Solar Project Solar PV Application Filed 5.0 F-10 ¨¦§ Barren Ridge I Solar PV Approved 60.0 F-10 Lancaster Barren Ridge Solar Solar PV On Hold 100.0 F-10 T !( eh Bartlett Avenue Solar Photovoltaic Project Solar PV In review 1.2 F-11 Antelope )" a ch !( Lompoc a !( Beacon Solar Energy Project Solar PV Under Construction 250.0 F-10 p !( i Bechtel Soda Mountain, LLC Solar PV EIS Published 350.0 G-10 S a n B e r n a r d i n o Ve n t u r a !( Beltran Ranch Solar Facility Phase I Solar PV Approved 26.0 C-7 !( Palmdale C o u n t y Beltran Ranch Solar Facility Phase II Solar PV Approved 40.0 C-7 C o u n t y !(Victorville Beltran Ranch Solar Facility Phase III Solar PV Approved 74.0 C-7 101 Black Rock 1,2, and 3 Geothermal Power Project Geothermal On Hold 159.0 H-12 ¤£ Vincent)" Santa Hesperia Blue Diamond Solar Energy Solar PV Approved 20.0 F-11 !( Barbara )" Haskell Canyon Blythe Airport Solar 1 Project Solar PV Approved 20.0 I-12 !( Name Type Status MW Grid !( !( Blythe Mesa Solar PV Approved 485.0 I-12 Lugo Santa Clarita i )" 11 Leo Solar Solar PV EIR Published 150.0 C-8 p T Blythe Solar Solar PV Under Construction 485.0 I-12 a e h h c a Liberty Solar Generation Project Solar PV Approved-On Hold 70.0 D-8 c Bogle Wind Turbine Wind Approved 1.6 C-6 San a h h a !( Lightsource Renewables Solar PV Approved 40.0 F-10 Buenaventura e p Bolthouse I Solar PV Approved 5.0 F-10 T !( )"Rinaldi i L o s A n g e l e s Bolthouse II Solar PV Approved 5.0 F-10 Lincoln Solar PV Under Construction 15.0 D-9 T Twentynine Gould eh C o u n t y Borax Solar Project Solar PV Application Filed 20.0 F-10 a Lindsey Solar Farm Solar PV Approved 20.0 H-12 Oxnard Thousand )" ch Yucca Palms ap Boulevard Associates Kramer Junction Solar Solar PV Approved 20.0 F-10 Little Bear Solar 1 Solar PV Application Filed 20.0 D-8 !( Oaks 5 i San Valley !( !( ¨¦§ !( Brannon Solar Solar PV Approved 20.0 D-8 !( Little Bear Solar 2 Solar PV Application Filed 20.0 D-8 101 !( 210 Bernardino Browning Rd Solar Solar PV Application Filed 4.5 E-9 ¤£ !( San Bernardino Little Bear Solar 3 Solar PV Application Filed 20.0 D-8 Los ¨¦§ Browns Valley Irrigation District FiT Small hydro Application Filed 1.0 C-5 405 )"Rio Hondo " Little Bear Solar 4 Solar PV Application Filed 20.0 D-8 Angeles 10 ) West of Devers Upgrade CA Solar, LLC Solar PV Application Filed 3.0 E-10 ¨¦§ i !( !( p Pomona ¨¦§ Vista a )" Lovern Solar Solar PV Approved 125.0 D-9 h Cabin Creek Landfill Biomass/Landfill Gas Approved 2.0 D-5 )" ac Chino h )" Mira Loma El Casco Cal City Solar Solar PV On Hold 96.0 F-10 Lower West Wind Energy Project Wind Approved 14.0 F-11 Mesa Te )" Devers T West of Devers Upgrade ehachapi !( Riverside )" Cal SP V Solar PV Approved-On Hold 20.0 D-8 Lucerne Valley Solar Solar PV In review 45.0 G-11 !( )" S CE Cal SP X Solar PV In review 5.0 D-8 - Lucerne Valley Solar 1 (Camp Rock Road) Solar PV In review 20.0 G-11 Tehachapi 500kV er Pa iv Palm th Cal SP XI Solar PV In review 10.0 D-8 R 42 Maclay Solar Project Solar PV Under Construction 2.2 F-11 Underground o Springs U R i v e r s i d e d pg California Department of Transportation Fontana Solar Solar PV Approved 1.2 F-11 Anaheim ra !( ra Marathon Solar Solar PV Approved 20.0 G-11 o de C o u n t y ol )" I California Flats Solar Project Solar PV Approved 280.0 D-9 !( -C ID Maricopa East Solar Solar PV In Review 18.0 E-10 215 y - P Col 15 lle Mirage a ora California State Prison Corcoran Solar Project Solar PV Approved 5.5 E-9 § a th do ¨¦ Maricopa West Solar PV Approved 20.0 E-10 ¨¦§ V Indio 42 Rive r Calipatria Solar Farm I Solar PV Approved 20.0 H-12 Up !( - De !( Santa Ana !( gra lane McCoy (Phase 1) Solar PV Under Construction 250.0 I-12 !( )"Valley de )"Red Bluff Blythe y 50 Camden Solar PV In review 1.5 D-9 Long 405 0kV McCoy (Phase 2) Solar PV Approved 500.0 I-12 !( iver 10 !( Canopy Mounted Solar Photovoltaic System Solar PV Application Filed 3.0 C-6 Beach ¨¦§ )" 10 ado R Delaney lor ¨¦§ Co Mendota Solar Solar PV In review 200.0 D-8 O r a n g e Coachella ¨¦§ alley- Casa Diablo IV Geothermal Approved 33.0 E-7 V )" Huntington!( Colorado River )" Castor Solar Project Solar PV EIR Published 1.5 E-10 Midway Solar Farm I Solar PV Approved 50.0 H-12 C o u n t y Valley Beach Catalina Renewable Energy Wind Approved 200.0 F-10 Midway Solar Farm II Solar PV Approved 155.0 H-12 Cenergy Power 1 Solar PV Approved 3.0 E-10 Monte Vista Solar Array Solar PV In review 126.0 D-10 Cenergy Power 2 Solar PV Approved 1.5 D-10 Morelos Del Sol Solar Solar PV Under Construction 15.0 E-10 Temecula 12 Cenergy Power 3 Solar PV Approved 3.0 D-8 Morgan Hills Wind Approved-On Hold 230.0 F-10 !( Central Antelope Dry Ranch C Solar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Renewable Energy Projects in Development with Existing And
    A B C D E F G H I J California ¨¦§5 2 ¤£101 !( Crescent Renewable Energy Projects in Development City Yreka D e l N o r t e !( C o u n t y S i s k i y o u M o d o c with Existing and Approved Transmission Lines C o u n t y C o u n t y Alturas !( Including Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Boundary ¤£395 and Preferred Development Focus Areas Updated 12/17/2015 3 Prepared by the California Energy Commission S h a s t a H u m b o l d t C o u n t y Renewable Energy Projects Eureka C o u n t y Land Ownerships Other Features !( L a s s e n In Development C o u n t y Biomass/ Solar PV Bureau of Land Management (! City Weaverville (! !( [[ !( Landfill Gas 1 - 20 MW )" [ [ Existing Substation* [ Department of Defense 5 (! Geothermal (! )" ¨¦§ 21 - 200 MW Bureau of Indian Affairs Approved Substation* 101 Redding !( ¤£ T r i n i t y !( (! Small Hydro C o u n t y (! 201 - 2,400 MW California State Park Road (! Wind State Owned Land County Boundary Susanville !( (! Solar Thermal Williamson Act NOTE: Williamson Act for Alpine, Del Norte, Inyo, Mono, Orange, San Benito, San Francisco and Yuba Counties not available Desert Renewable Energy Existing Transmission Line Conservation Plan Boundary Private Land 4 Red 345 - 500kV Bluff DRECP Conservation Lands !( 200 - 287kV Te h a m a Prohibited, Restricted & Limited Lands C o u n t y 110 - 161kV Mohave Ground Squirrel ¤£395 Category I Lands Key Population Center Energy Development Prohibited or Restricted by Policy Quincy !( Federal Energy Corridors P l u m a s Category II Lands Dry Lake C o u n t
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O, Existing Renewable Energy Projects Within DRECP
    Appendix O Existing Renewable Energy Projects Within DRECP Plan Area Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX O. EXISTING RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS WITHIN PLAN AREA O EXISTING RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS WITHIN PLAN AREA Background. The list of projects included in this file was developed to help define the number and capacity of existing renewable energy projects in the Plan Area. These projects are considered part of the affected environment in the EIR/EIS Volume III. A map indicating the locations of these projects is presented as Figure III.1-2. Existing projects include those that are either operational or under construction as of October 2013. Two tables are attached: Table O-1: Summary of Existing RE Projects (data summarized from Table O-2) Table O-2: Existing RE Projects (all projects) Table O-1 below presents the acreage of existing renewable energy projects in the DRECP Plan Area. For informational purposes, 57% (50,337 acres) of the land affected by existing renewable energy projects are located in the Preferred Alternative DFAs, as defined in Volume II. This represents less than 2.5% of the DFA acreage for the Preferred Alternative. Table O-1 Summary of Existing Renewable Energy (RE) Projects in the DRECP Plan Area Generation Capacity Acreage Percent of Percent Total Acres Total Total of Percent of RE Projects Acres of RE Project Total Total of Total in the RE Projects Acreage MW MW Acres Plan Area in DFAs* in DFAs* BLM-Administered 1,805 29% 28% 24,593 8,686 35% Public Lands – Total Wind 615 34% 61% 15,028 2,592 11% Solar 1,190 66% 39% 9,565 6,094 25% Private Lands and 4,445 71% 72% 64,463 41,634 65% Other Public Lands – Total Wind 2,015 45% 69% 44,643 23,222 36% Solar 2,330 53% 31% 19,265 18,419 29% Geothermal 100 2% 0.1% 545 545 0.1% Total RE Projects 6,250 100% 100% 89,046 50,337 57% *The DFA locations for the Preferred Alternative are used to define in this exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Attendees
    Company Name: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Event Title: RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Event Date: 14-Jul-15 Event Time: 9:00 AM PPT Name Company 1 Abram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Scource 2 Alison Khalaf Pristine Sun 3 Angela Plummer Pristine Sun 4 Avram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Storage 5 Boyega Ajayi SolarReserve 6 Carolyn Campbell Recurrent Energy 7 Cynthia Hernandez Ormat Nevada Inc 8 Daniel Kim Westlands Solar Park 9 David Bruder Lockheed Martin 10 David Moran Drilling And Trenchi 11 Davin Arvonen Rds Properties 12 Deborah Builder 8 Minutenerty 13 Dipa Sharif ConEdison Development 14 Ed Cook E.ON 15 Eric Larson 8minutenergy Renewables 16 Erin Kenney Anahau Energy 17 Eun Gi Chung 8minutenergy Renewables 18 Frank Mossburg Boston Pacific Company 19 Fred Hanks Cal-Pacific Carbon 20 Fred Vaske 8minutenergy 21 Genevieve Liang Mirasol Development 22 Hans Stullken North State Solar 23 Harrison Luna Hecate Energy 24 Jack Pigott First Solar 25 James Cook First Solar 26 James Kelly Nrg Renew Llc 27 Jamie Nagel ZGlobal 28 Jason Joner Modoc Capital 29 Jennifer Desrosier SunEdison 30 Jennifer Hunt FuelCell Energy 31 Joe Briney sPower 32 John Barnes Solar Land Partners.Inc 33 John Monahan JCM Associates 34 jonathan Mancini Bridgewell Resources 35 Jonathan Rappe Soldevco 36 Josh Martin Westlands Solar Park 37 Joshua Martin Westlands Solar Park 38 Julian Chapa Julian Chapa 39 Kathryn Malone Edf Renewable Energy 40 Kayvon Deldawr SPower 41 Kenneth Quigley Cal-Pacific Carbon, LLC 42 Lee Kossla Colemko Llc 43 Marvis Averett Drilling World 44 Matt Barnes Grid Subject Matter Experts, LLC 45 Mhe Uruville Dell Toll Energy 46 Michael Joh Eight Minute Energy 47 Michael Morianti Abengoa Solar 48 Nicole Lepre Con Edison Development, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • BC-TES-TMP-2443.Pdf (5.514Mb)
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS Para Optar el Título Profesional de INGENIERO MECÁNICO ELECTRICISTA “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA AL CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” Presentado Por: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ Asesor: Msc. Ing. JONY VILLALOBOS CABRERA LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS Para Optar el Título Profesional de INGENIERO MECÁNICO ELECTRICISTA “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA ALELECTRICISTA CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” Presentado Por: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ Aprobado por el Jurado Examinador PRESIDENTE: Dr. DANIEL CARRANZA MONTENEGRO. SECRETARIO: ING. CARLOS JAVIER COTRINA SAAVEDRA. MIEMBRO: ING. TEOBALDO EDGAR JULCA OROZCO. ASESOR: M.Sc. JONY VILLALOBOS CABRERA. LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS TITULO “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA AL CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” CONTENIDOS CAPITULO I: PROBLEMA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN. CAPITULO II: MARCO TEÓRICO. CAPITULO III: MARCO METODOLÓGICO. CAPITULO IV: PROPUESTA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN. CAPITULO V: ANÁLISIS E INTERPRETACIÓN DE LOS RESULTADOS. CAPITULO VI: CONCLUSIONES Y RECOMENDACIONES. AUTOR: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ --------------------------------- --------------------------------------- PRESIDENTE SECRETARIO ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- MIEMBRO ASESOR LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 DEDICATORIA Dedico éste Proyecto de Tesis a: Dios ya que gracias a Él he llegado a concluir una de mis metas la cual es concluir con mi carrera.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Power Card U.S
    NORTH SCORE AMERICAN SOLAR POWER CARD U.S. SOLAR POWER Canada Solar Power Total grid-connected PV generating capacity for the U.S., as of the Total PV grid-connected capacity, end of 2019: 3,196 MW end of Q1, 2020: 81,400 megawatts (MW) Installed in 2019: 102 MW Growth in PV generated capacity during 2019: 13,300 MW of new solar PV ✷ Solar power accounted for nearly 40 percent of all new electricity generating capacity added in the U.S. in 2019, the largest annual share in the industry’s history. Canadian Solar Power Initiatives ✷ The U.S. solar market installed 3.6 gigawatts (GW) of new solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity in Q1 2020, representing its largest first quarter ever in the U.S. ✷ The Government of Canada launched the long-awaited Greening Government initiative, a power purchase agreement (PPA) program, with a request for information regarding The COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant impact on the U.S. solar industry, but overall, the ✷ the procurement of up to 280,000 MWh per year in newly-built solar PV and wind generation Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and consulting firm Wood Mackenzie forecast 33 percent capacity. It is designed to offset federal government operations within the province of growth in 2020, owing entirely to the strong performance of the utility-scale segment, which is Alberta, as well as an additional 240,000 – 360,000 MWh per year in Renewable Energy expected to account for more than 14 GW of new installations this year. Certificates (REC) to offset Federal electricity emissions in other provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE CHANGE BUSINESS JOURNAL® Volume V, No
    on for the Clim mati ate C for han In g ic e I g nd te u a s r t t r S y CLIMATE CHANGE BUSINESS JOURNAL® Volume V, No. 11/12 November/December 2012 Climate Change Business Journal 2012 Business 2012 Executive Review & CCBJ Awards Achievement Awards CCBJ’s 2012 Business Achievement Awards recognize more than 30 high achievers in the climate change industry. Senior executives and top experts in the Business Achievement: Growth industry share their perspectives in Q&A sessions and bylined guest articles. Gold Q&As & Articles Inside this Issue: rightSource Energy (Oakland, 11: Top 12 CCBJ quotes from 2012 30: Greenhouse Gas Management Institute focuses on professional development and Calif.) for becoming the clear 12: Then & Now: Skeptics who changed education. leader in the U.S. concentrat- their minds about climate change ing solar power (CSP) segment. At a 34: Powerit offers automated solutions to B 18: AECOM on risk management and time when most CSP projects proposed industrial demand response market. over the last four years in the United climate change adaptation. 37: WSP finds mitigation and adaptation States have been delayed, canceled or 21: Jane Capital offers perspective on smart figuring large in the in supply chain. reconfigured as solar PV projects, Bright- grid investments. Source has pushed ahead with its 377 40: WESTON describes how sustainability 24: Pike Research addresses distributed MW Ivanpah Solar Energy Generating unites a diverse practice. generation and microgrids. System (86% owned by NRG Energy 43: CH2M HILL engages with climate risk and Google) in the southwest California 26: Real estate services firm CBRE looks at worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Helios, Silfab E Le Macerie Del Governo
    ANNO 4 - N°45 - 10 DICEMBRE 2012 - LA NEWSLETTER PER GLI OPERATORI DI SETTORE Leader Europei nell’integrazione architettonica. Moduli speciali CAPILLARY COMB made in EU. www.sunage.ch CONTO ENERGIA EDITORIALE AZIENDE E BRAND Impianti in esercizio: 461.981 CITATI IN QUESTO NUMERO Potenza: 16.108,5 MW HELIOS, SILFAB Aeeg Afase Costo indicativo annuo E LE MACERIE DEL GOVERNO AFHolding degli incentivi: Aión Renewables 6.490,9 milioni di euro Fa una certa impressione assistere al tramonto di un Governo proprio nel momento in cui vengono a galla le drammatiche conseguenze delle deli- Anie/Gifi Alla fine del 5° Conto berate scelte di uno dei suo dicasteri più importanti: quello dello Sviluppo Anie Energia Energia mancano: Aros 209,1 milioni di euro Economico. Assosolare Mentre il tema della mancanza di una strategia industriale per il Paese AvProject Installati da inizio 2012: riempie i dibattiti in Tv e sui giornali, anche sull’onda delle vicende dell’Il- Bester Generación 3.647,5 MW Bisol Group Installati 5° Conto Energia: va e della Fiat, l’industria italiana del fotovoltaico continua a perdere pezzi. 413,9 MW Centrosolar Nei giorni scorsi Aión Renewables ha depositato la domanda di con- Cobat Potenza media 5° Conto cordato preventivo per Helios Technology. E da Padova arrivano notizie Coenergia Energia: 26,4 kWp Confindustria Ancona segue a pagina 2 Potenza media da inizio Confindustria Energia 2012: 25,4 kWp Danfoss Potenza media totale Elettronica Santerno installato: 34,9 KWp News dal 3 al 7 dicembre 2012 Enecsys NB: Non sono compresi gli Energy Resources impianti iscritti in posizione Dal 18 al 20 aprile tornano a Fabriano EnergyLink utile al 1° registro del 5° General Membrane Conto Energia e non ancora “Le giornate dell’energia” Gruppo Carraro in esercizio 07/12.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Construction Development
    Major Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction, or Under Development Updated March 7, 2016 Overview This list is for informational purposes only, reflecting projects and completed milestones in the public domain. The information in this list was gathered from public announcements of solar projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with individual developers. It is not a comprehensive list of all major solar projects under development. This list may be missing smaller projects that are not publicly announced. Particularly, many smaller projects located outside of California that are built on a short time-scale may be underrepresented on this list. Also, SEIA does not guarantee that every identified project will be built. Like any other industry, market conditions may impact project economics and timelines. SEIA will remove a project if it is publicly announced that it has been cancelled. SEIA actively promotes public policy that minimizes regulatory uncertainty and encourages the accelerated deployment of utility-scale solar power. This list includes ground-mounted solar power plants 1 MW and larger. Example Projects Nevada Solar One Sierra SunTower Nellis Air Force Base DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center Developer: Acciona Developer: eSolar Developer: MMA Renewable Ventures Developer: Florida Power & Light Co. Electricity Purchaser: NV Energy Electricity Purchaser: Southern Electricity Purchaser: Nellis AFB Electricity Purchaser: Florida Power & California
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Project Description
    2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014. Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-9 CUP 13-0039 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-20 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-10 CUP 13-0040 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-21 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-11 CUP 13-0041 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-22 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-12 CUP 13-0042 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-23 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-13 CUP 13-0043 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-24 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-14 CUP 13-0044 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-25 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a. FIGURE 2.0-15 CUP 13-0045 – ACCESS POINT AND ELECTRICAL FLOW DIAGRAM County of Imperial Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center August 2014 Draft EIR 2.0-26 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Source: DD&E 2014a.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Irrigation District (IID)
    Imperial Irrigation District (IID) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) presentation during its 11/16/15 Stakeholder meeting discussing the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan. IID’s comments are focused on the presentation entitled “Policy Driven Planning Deliverability Assessment Assumptions” and also on generation data shown under the 2015-2016 RPS Portfolio. 1. In the Policy Driven Planning presentation, third bullet, slide 4 “Import Assumptions” it states that IID imports through IID-SCE and IID-SDGE branch groups is increased from 2016 MIC. What is this new value of MIC for IID moving forward from 2016? 2. Further in this presentation it was mentioned that Imperial CREZ can accommodate up to 1750 MW of new generation. How is this 1750 MW determined? Can you provide a breakdown of where this generation is (or will be) located and how many MWs at each location? 3. IID’s internal studies have indicated that Imperial CREZ can actually accommodate up to about 2800 MW depending upon where generation is located while respecting the ECO- Miguel constrained path. Did CAISO consider the Locational Effectiveness Factor (LEF) while determining the 1750 MW? 4. A formal presentation was made to CAISO senior management in March 2015 to share the above IID findings through ZGlobal. CAISO subsequently, performed an internal study to verify ZGlobal’s findings and came up with a draft discussion paper recommending further analysis. 5. To follow up on IID internal study and ISO’s own study, IID is recommending that IID and ISO staff work together to identify the most promising locations for new renewables in the Imperial Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ) to maximize the use of available transmission capacity in IID and CAISO systems to provide an overall benefit to California ratepayers.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Power Card U.S
    NORTH SCORE AMERICAN SOLAR POWER CARD U.S. SOLAR POWER Canada - Solar Power Total grid-connected PV generating capacity for the U.S., end of Q1, 2019: 67,000 MW Total PV grid-connected capacity, end of 2018: 3,094 MW The growth in PV generated capacity during 2018: 10,600 megawatts Installed in 2018: 161 MW ✷ A report from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) says that total installed U.S. PV capacity will more than double over the next five years, with annual installations reaching 16.4 GW in 2021. Canadian Solar Power Initiatives ✷ In Q1 2019, the U.S. solar market surpassed 2 million installations—just three years after the market surpassed the 1 million installation milestone. ✷ California and North Carolina remain the two largest solar states, with California topping 25,000 MW of solar power, and North Carolina now exceeding 5,400 MW of solar power. ✷ Canada’s federal government has announced the Climate Action Incentive Fund (CAIF) to help fight climate change. Under the CAIF program, small- and medium-sized enterprises could be eligible to receive up to 25 percent of their energy efficiency project costs. Eligible projects include the production of renewable energy, including solar energy projects. ✷ In its budget, the Canadian government announced new investments in moving Canada to a cleaner energy future based on renewable power and smart technologies. Particularly notable investments include $2.2 billion in additional infrastructure funding for communities, including for community energy systems; support for planning efforts by jurisdictions looking 4 to advance clean energy projects; and actions to help smooth Canada’s transition away Nevada from coal-fired power.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/62w112cg Journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29 ISSN 1364-0321 Authors Hernandez, RR Easter, SB Murphy-Mariscal, ML et al. Publication Date 2014 DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014) 766–779 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy R.R. Hernandez a,b,n, S.B. Easter b,c, M.L. Murphy-Mariscal d, F.T. Maestre e, M. Tavassoli b, E.B. Allen d,f, C.W. Barrows d, J. Belnap g, R. Ochoa-Hueso h,S.Ravia, M.F. Allen d,i,j a Department of Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA b Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA c Ecofactor, Redwood City, CA, USA d Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA e Departamento de Biología y Geología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain f Department of Botany and Plant Science, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA g U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Moab, UT, USA h Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, 2751, New South Wales, Australia i Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA j Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA article info abstract Article history: Renewable energy is a promising alternative to fossil fuel-based energy, but its development can require Received 22 February 2013 a complex set of environmental tradeoffs.
    [Show full text]