DOCSLIB.ORG

RE Slate Solar Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RE Slate Solar Project RE Slate Solar Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2019 | REC-06.02 Prepared for: Kings County Community Development Agency Planning Division 1400 W. Lacey Boulevard, Building #6 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 11 Natoma Street, Suite 155 Folsom, CA 95630 RE Slate Solar Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for: Kings County Community Development Agency Planning Division 1400 W. Lacey Boulevard, Building #6 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 11 Natoma Street, Suite 155 Folsom, CA 95630 June 2019 | REC-06.02 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .........................................................................................................2 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................................4 3.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................................ 4 3.3 Need .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................... 6 3.5 Project Features .................................................................................................................. 7 3.6 Construction...................................................................................................................... 15 3.7 Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................................. 28 3.8 Decommissioning and Site Reclamation ........................................................................... 33 3.9 References ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.0 PERMITS AND APPROVALS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED ............................................................ 37 4.1 County of Kings ................................................................................................................. 37 4.2 Other Agencies .................................................................................................................. 37 4.3 Project Approvals .............................................................................................................. 38 4.4 Interconnection to Approved but Not yet Constructed RE Mustang Two Project Gen-Tie Line ...................................................................................................................... 38 5.0 PREVIOUS RELEVANT ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ................................................................ 39 5.1 References ........................................................................................................................ 39 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ............................................................ 40 7.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ........................................................................ 41 7.1 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................... 41 7.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................. 46 7.3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 59 7.4 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 71 7.5 Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................... 106 7.6 Energy ............................................................................................................................. 126 7.7 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................ 129 7.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................. 138 7.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................. 145 7.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 164 7.11 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................... 181 7.12 Mineral Resources .......................................................................................................... 186 7.13 Noise ............................................................................................................................... 187 7.14 Population and Housing .................................................................................................. 192 7.15 Public Services................................................................................................................. 195 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) 7.16 Recreation ....................................................................................................................... 198 7.17 Transportation ................................................................................................................ 200 7.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ................................................................................................ 210 7.19 Utilities and Service Systems .......................................................................................... 213 7.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................... 218 7.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................................ 220 8.0 MITIGATION AND MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM ..................................................... 229 9.0 INITIAL STUDY PREPARERS ................................................................................................. 229 LIST OF APPENDICES A Figures B Site Drawings C Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report D Biological Resources Technical Report E Cultural Resources Technical Report (Confidential – Not for Public Review) F Energy Model G Hazardous Materials - Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments H Water Supply Assessment I Traffic Impact Study J Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page 3.6-1 Areas Available and Not Available for Grazing During Operation ................................................. 15 3.7-1 Solar Facility Construction Phasing, Workforce and Average Trip Generation ............................. 22 3.7-2 Solar Facility On-Site Equipment and Vehicle Use by Construction Phase .................................... 23 3.7-3 Energy Storage System Construction Phasing and Workforce ...................................................... 24 3.7-4 Energy Storage System On-Site Equipment and Vehicle Use by Construction Phase ................... 25 3.7-5 Overlapping Construction Trip Generation ................................................................................... 26 3.8-1 Proposed Operations and Maintenance Equipment ..................................................................... 29 3.9-1 Decommissioning Equipment ........................................................................................................ 35 7.3-1 SJVAPCD Air Quality Significance Thresholds ................................................................................ 63 7.3-2 Annual Construction Emissions...................................................................................................... 64 7.3-3 Annual Construction Emissions With Use of Tier 4 Off-Road Construction Equipment ................ 65 7.3-4 Annual Operation Emissions .......................................................................................................... 66 7.3-5 Annual Decommissioning Emissions .............................................................................................. 66 7.3-6 Health Risk Levels from Project Construction at Closest Sensitive Receptor ................................ 69 7.4-1 Special-Status Species With Potential to Occur ............................................................................. 76 7.4-2 SWHA Foraging Habitat in the Study Area ..................................................................................... 91 7.4-3 Project Impacts and CEQA Significance Threshold ........................................................................ 92 7.5-1 Previously Recorded Sites Within 0.5-Mile of Project Site .......................................................... 111 7.5-2 Field Conditions Summary ........................................................................................................... 113 7.6-1 Total Construction Energy Use ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics
    Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on September 16, 2019, GCU-2019-0004 Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics The increasing presence of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems (sometimes referred to as solar farms) is a rather new development in North Carolina’s landscape. Due to the new and unknown nature of this technology, it is natural for communities near such developments to be concerned about health and safety impacts. Unfortunately, the quick emergence of utility-scale solar has cultivated fertile grounds for myths and half-truths about the health impacts of this technology, which can lead to unnecessary fear and conflict. Photovoltaic (PV) technologies and solar inverters are not known to pose any significant health dangers to their neighbors. The most important dangers posed are increased highway traffic during the relative short construction period and dangers posed to trespassers of contact with high voltage equipment. This latter risk is mitigated by signage and the security measures that industry uses to deter trespassing. As will be discussed in more detail below, risks of site contamination are much less than for most other industrial uses because PV technologies employ few toxic chemicals and those used are used in very small quantities. Due to the reduction in the pollution from fossil-fuel-fired electric generators, the overall impact of solar development on human health is overwhelmingly positive. This pollution reduction results from a partial replacement of fossil-fuel fired generation by emission-free PV-generated electricity, which reduces harmful sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project
    DRAFT Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration LEO Solar Project November 2019 Lead Agency: Kings County 1400 West Lacey Boulevard, Building. #6 Hanford, California 93230 Prepared for: Apex Energy Solutions, LLC 604 Sutter Street, Suite 250 Folsom, California 95630 (916) 985-9461 Prepared by: 2525 Warren Drive Rocklin, California 95677 Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LEO SOLAR PROJECT Lead Agency: Kings County Community Development Agency, Kings County Government Center, 1400 West Lacey Boulevard, Hanford, California 93230 Project Proponent: Apex Energy Solutions, LLC, 604 Sutter Street Suite 250, Folsom, California 95630 Project Location: The proposed Leo Solar Project (Project) occupies ±30 acres of a 40-acre parcel located near 25th Avenue 15 miles south of unincorporated Kettleman City, California (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 048-350-016- 000). The project site is situated in the unincorporated area of Kings County, California, along the Kings County/Kern County border, between California State Route (SR) 33 and Interstate 5 (I-5), approximately 0.5 mile east of 25th Avenue. The site corresponds to a portion of Section 36, Township 24 South, and Range 19 East of the Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (MDBM) of the “Avenal Gap” topographic quadrangles 7.5- minute quadrangle (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] 2015). Project Description: The Project includes the development of up to a 5-megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generating facility and battery storage system (BESS) facility on ±30 acres of 40 undeveloped acres. The facility would consist of solar PV modules mounted on stationary fixed-tilt, ground- mounted racking or single-axis trackers and would include up to 5-MW alternating current (AC) maximum capacity, four-hour battery energy storage system.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Experiment of a Sun-Powered Smart Building Envelope with Automatic Control
    Energy & Buildings 223 (2020) 110173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy & Buildings journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enb Design and experiment of a sun-powered smart building envelope with automatic control Qiliang Lin a, Yanchu Zhang a, Arnaud Van Mieghem b, Yi-Chung Chen c, Nanfang Yu d, Yuan Yang d, ⇑ Huiming Yin a, a Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, United States b Department of Electrical Engineering ESAT, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium c Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tennessee State University, United States d Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, United States article info abstract Article history: A novel sun-powered smart window blind (SPSWB) system has been designed and developed for the Received 26 February 2020 smart control of building envelopes to achieve the optimal internal comfort with minimum energy Revised 15 May 2020 expenditure. Its self-powered sensing, controlling, and actuation significantly simplify the installation Accepted 21 May 2020 and maintenance of the system. The energy is harvested by the attached thin-film photovoltaic cells, after Available online 29 May 2020 which it is voltage-regulated for the permanent storage into a rechargeable battery with 55% energy effi- ciency. The excessive heat absorbed by the solar cells is dissipated by a PVdF-HFP porous coating with Keywords: more than 9% temperature reduction. The smart control of the energy harvesting and the cooling is Smart building envelope achieved based on the blinds’ surface temperature by an Arduino-based sensing, controlling, and actuat- Window blinds Energy harvesting ing system, whose energy consumption is closely monitored.
    [Show full text]
  • US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009
    US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009 Thursday, April 15, 2010 575 7th Street NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20004 | www.seia.org Executive Summary U.S. Cumulative Solar Capacity Growth Despite the Great Recession of 2009, the U.S. solar energy 2,500 25,000 23,835 industry grew— both in new installations and 2,000 20,000 employment. Total U.S. solar electric capacity from 15,870 2,108 photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) 1,500 15,000 technologies climbed past 2,000 MW, enough to serve -th MW more than 350,000 homes. Total U.S. solar thermal 1,000 10,000 MW 1 capacity approached 24,000 MWth. Solar industry 494 revenues also surged despite the economy, climbing 500 5,000 36 percent in 2009. - - A doubling in size of the residential PV market and three new CSP plants helped lift the U.S. solar electric market 37 percent in annual installations over 2008 from 351 MW in 2008 to 481 MW in 2009. Solar water heating (SWH) Electricity Capacity (MW) Thermal Capacity (MW-Th) installations managed 10 percent year-over-year growth, while the solar pool heating (SPH) market suffered along Annual U.S. Solar Energy Capacity Growth with the broader construction industry, dropping 10 1,200 1,099 percent. 1,036 1,000 918 894 928 Another sign of continued optimism in solar energy: 865 -th 725 758 742 venture capitalists invested more in solar technologies than 800 542 any other clean technology in 2009. In total, $1.4 billion in 600 481 2 351 venture capital flowed to solar companies in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Ab307 Application Summary Proposed Project Applicant App
    AB307 APPLICATION SUMMARY PROPOSED PROJECT APPLICANT APP. RCVD. TYPE COUNTY SIZE Bordertown to California 120kV NV Energy 6/27/2012 Powerline Washoe 120 kV North Elko Pipeline Prospector Pipeline Comp. 7/11/2012 Nat Gas Pipeline Elko, Eureka Wild Rose ORNI 47 7/17/2012 Geothermal Mineral 30 MW New York Canyon New York Canyon LLC 8/14/2012 Geothermal Persh., Church. 70 MW Mountain View Solar Energy Mountain View Solar LLC 9/24/2012 Solar Clark 20 MW Mahacek to Mt. Hope 230kV Eureka Moly LLC 10/23/2012 Powerline Eureka 230 kV Moapa Solar Energy Center Moapa Solar LLC 11/5/2012 Powerline Clark 230 kV, 500 kV Pahrump Valley Solar Project Abengoa Solar Inc. 11/14/2012 Solar Clark, Nye 225 MW Copper Rays Solar Farm Element Power Solar Dev. LLC 11/26/2012 Solar Nye 180 MW Boulder City Solar Project Techren Solar 1/2/2013 Solar Clark 300 MW Townsite Solar Project KOWEPO America LLC/Skylar Res. LP 1/15/2013 Solar Clark 180 MW Copper Mountain Solar 3 CMS-3 LLC (Sempra Energy) 1/16/2013 Solar Clark 250 MW Crescent Peak Wind Crescent Peak Renewables LLC 1/23/2013 Wind Clark 500 MW Silver State Solar South Silver State Solar Power South LLC 1/23/2013 Solar Clark 350 MW Toquop Power Project Toquop Power Holdings LLC 1/23/2013 Fossil Fuel Lincoln 1,100 MW Hidden Hills 230kV Transmission Valley Electric Transmission Assoc. LLC 1/28/2013 Powerline Nye, Clark 230 kV Boulder Solar Project Boulder Solar Power LLC 1/25/2013 Solar Clark 350 MW ARES Regulation Energy Mgmt.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement
    DOE/EIS–0458 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME II: APPENDICES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE TO ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND FOR CONSTRUCTION AND STARTUP OF THE TOPAZ SOLAR FARM SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA US Department of Energy, Lead Agency Loan Guarantee Program Office Washington, DC 20585 In Cooperation with US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District August 2011 APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A Public Scoping Appendix B PG&E Connected Action Appendix C Farmlands Correspondence and Analysis Appendix D Visual Simulation Methodology Appendix E Biological Resources, Including Section 7 Consultation Appendix F Cultural Resources, Including Section 106 Consultation Appendix G Draft Wildfire Management Plan Appendix H USACE CWA Section 404 Individual Permit Information Appendix I Contractor Disclosure Statement Appendix J Distribution List Appendix K Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Appendix A Public Scoping 65306 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Notices required by Section 10(a)(2) of the discussion of recently released IES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Advisory Committee Act and is reports will be held from 2:30 p.m. until intended to notify the public of their 4 p.m. The meeting will close to the Notice of Intent To Prepare an opportunity to attend the open portion public from 4 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. for the Environmental Impact Statement for a of the meeting. The public is being election of Chair and Vice Chair. The Proposed Federal Loan Guarantee To given less than 15 days’ notice due to new officers will have a brief Support Construction of the Topaz the need to accommodate the members’ opportunity to address the membership Solar Farm, San Luis Obispo County, schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL
    Arizona’s Energy Future 99th Arizona Town Hall November 6 - 9, 2011 Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL PREMIER PARTNER CONTRIBUTING PARTNER COLLABORATING PARTNERS SUPPORTING PARTNERS CIVIC PARTNERS CORE Construction Kennedy Partners Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite Sundt Construction One East Camelback, Suite 530, Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Phone: 602.252.9600 Fax: 602.252.6189 Website: www.aztownhall.org Email: [email protected] ARIZONA’S ENERGY FUTURE September 2011 We thank you for making the commitment to participate in the 99th Arizona Town Hall to be held at the Grand Canyon on November 6-9, 2011. You will be discussing and developing consensus with fellow Arizonans on the future of energy in Arizona. An essential element to the success of these consensus-driven discussions is this background report that is provided to all participants before the Town Hall convenes. As they have so often done for past Arizona Town Halls, Arizona State University has prepared a detailed and informative report that will provide a unique and unparalleled resource for your Town Hall panel sessions. Special thanks go to editors Clark Miller and Sharlissa Moore of the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes at ASU for spearheading this effort and marshaling many talented professionals to write individual chapters. For sharing their wealth of knowledge and professional talents, our thanks go to the many authors who contributed to the report. Our deepest gratitude also goes to University Vice President and Dean of the College of Public Programs for ASU, Debra Friedman, and Director of the School of Public Affairs for ASU, Jonathan Koppell, who made great efforts to ensure that ASU could provide this type of resource to Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Attendees
    Company Name: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Event Title: RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Event Date: 14-Jul-15 Event Time: 9:00 AM PPT Name Company 1 Abram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Scource 2 Alison Khalaf Pristine Sun 3 Angela Plummer Pristine Sun 4 Avram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Storage 5 Boyega Ajayi SolarReserve 6 Carolyn Campbell Recurrent Energy 7 Cynthia Hernandez Ormat Nevada Inc 8 Daniel Kim Westlands Solar Park 9 David Bruder Lockheed Martin 10 David Moran Drilling And Trenchi 11 Davin Arvonen Rds Properties 12 Deborah Builder 8 Minutenerty 13 Dipa Sharif ConEdison Development 14 Ed Cook E.ON 15 Eric Larson 8minutenergy Renewables 16 Erin Kenney Anahau Energy 17 Eun Gi Chung 8minutenergy Renewables 18 Frank Mossburg Boston Pacific Company 19 Fred Hanks Cal-Pacific Carbon 20 Fred Vaske 8minutenergy 21 Genevieve Liang Mirasol Development 22 Hans Stullken North State Solar 23 Harrison Luna Hecate Energy 24 Jack Pigott First Solar 25 James Cook First Solar 26 James Kelly Nrg Renew Llc 27 Jamie Nagel ZGlobal 28 Jason Joner Modoc Capital 29 Jennifer Desrosier SunEdison 30 Jennifer Hunt FuelCell Energy 31 Joe Briney sPower 32 John Barnes Solar Land Partners.Inc 33 John Monahan JCM Associates 34 jonathan Mancini Bridgewell Resources 35 Jonathan Rappe Soldevco 36 Josh Martin Westlands Solar Park 37 Joshua Martin Westlands Solar Park 38 Julian Chapa Julian Chapa 39 Kathryn Malone Edf Renewable Energy 40 Kayvon Deldawr SPower 41 Kenneth Quigley Cal-Pacific Carbon, LLC 42 Lee Kossla Colemko Llc 43 Marvis Averett Drilling World 44 Matt Barnes Grid Subject Matter Experts, LLC 45 Mhe Uruville Dell Toll Energy 46 Michael Joh Eight Minute Energy 47 Michael Morianti Abengoa Solar 48 Nicole Lepre Con Edison Development, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Power Card U.S
    NORTH SCORE AMERICAN SOLAR POWER CARD U.S. SOLAR POWER Canada Solar Power Total grid-connected PV generating capacity for the U.S., as of the Total PV grid-connected capacity, end of 2019: 3,196 MW end of Q1, 2020: 81,400 megawatts (MW) Installed in 2019: 102 MW Growth in PV generated capacity during 2019: 13,300 MW of new solar PV ✷ Solar power accounted for nearly 40 percent of all new electricity generating capacity added in the U.S. in 2019, the largest annual share in the industry’s history. Canadian Solar Power Initiatives ✷ The U.S. solar market installed 3.6 gigawatts (GW) of new solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity in Q1 2020, representing its largest first quarter ever in the U.S. ✷ The Government of Canada launched the long-awaited Greening Government initiative, a power purchase agreement (PPA) program, with a request for information regarding The COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant impact on the U.S. solar industry, but overall, the ✷ the procurement of up to 280,000 MWh per year in newly-built solar PV and wind generation Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and consulting firm Wood Mackenzie forecast 33 percent capacity. It is designed to offset federal government operations within the province of growth in 2020, owing entirely to the strong performance of the utility-scale segment, which is Alberta, as well as an additional 240,000 – 360,000 MWh per year in Renewable Energy expected to account for more than 14 GW of new installations this year. Certificates (REC) to offset Federal electricity emissions in other provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Electric Las Vegas Nv
    Renewable Energy Electric Las Vegas Nv Is Donnie incensed when Maury pize asymmetrically? Slant and conjoint Hamlet target his clarinet cower indagate bitter. Eminently cissoid, Aram desulphurise rampions and uptorn baldrick. In the accuracy of nv energy electric las vegas means great option for the opal trading hub for your comment on weather, are based on their crews often VEA partnered with Bombard Renewable Energy of Las Vegas. Would have allowed electric utility companies to offer electricity made from renewable energy to. Nevada solar industry collapses after state lets power. NV Energy Inc Electric Energy Online. Robco Electric Las Vegas Las Vegas Solar Power. Techren II HV Substation Rosendin Electric. Sol-Up offers design and installation of solar panels in Las Vegas and the. The Average Electric Bill In Las Vegas Sharing My Energy. The changes by NV Energy are deaf of a national trend in for utility companies. Lots of sun & AC usage chart that Las Vegas is delight for solar. The Renewables Portfolio Standard RPS in Nevada mandates that by 2025. Acciona is a renewable energy company based in Spain. A Renewable Portfolio Standard RPS requires electric-. 20 Best solar energy jobs in Las Vegas NV Hiring Now. Update newsletter with the preferred premier subcontractor for nv energy. Clean Energy NV Energy. My home mortgage simply because retirees choosing henderson, nv energy to add to be passed both commercial water, which is rescheduled for berkshire hathaway energy! Bell Solar & Electrical Systems is insure the forefront of the renewable energy revolution We climb the highest quality materials with all best play service in.
    [Show full text]
  • UNEP Guide for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Laws
    UNEP Guide for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Laws United Nations Environment Programme, Pace University Law School Energy and Climate Center UNEP United Nations Environment Programme i Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UN Environment) September 2016 UNEP Guide for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Laws – English ISBN No: 978-92-807-3609-0 Job No: DEL/2045/NA Reproduction This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational and non profit pur- poses without special permission from the copyright holder, provided that acknowledgement of the source is made. UN Environment Programme will appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this material as a source. No use of this publication can be made for the resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without the prior permission in writing of UN Environment Programme. Application for such permission with a statement of purpose of the reproduction should be addressed to the Communications Division, of the UN Environment Programme, P.O BOX 30552, Nairobi 00100 Kenya. The use of information from this document for publicity of advertising is not permitted. Disclaimer The contents and views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the UN Environment Programme or its member states. The designations employed and the presentation of materials in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UN Environ- ment concerning the legal status of any country, territory or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries.
    [Show full text]