DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DRAFT Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration LEO Solar Project November 2019 Lead Agency: Kings County 1400 West Lacey Boulevard, Building. #6 Hanford, California 93230 Prepared for: Apex Energy Solutions, LLC 604 Sutter Street, Suite 250 Folsom, California 95630 (916) 985-9461 Prepared by: 2525 Warren Drive Rocklin, California 95677 Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LEO SOLAR PROJECT Lead Agency: Kings County Community Development Agency, Kings County Government Center, 1400 West Lacey Boulevard, Hanford, California 93230 Project Proponent: Apex Energy Solutions, LLC, 604 Sutter Street Suite 250, Folsom, California 95630 Project Location: The proposed Leo Solar Project (Project) occupies ±30 acres of a 40-acre parcel located near 25th Avenue 15 miles south of unincorporated Kettleman City, California (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 048-350-016- 000). The project site is situated in the unincorporated area of Kings County, California, along the Kings County/Kern County border, between California State Route (SR) 33 and Interstate 5 (I-5), approximately 0.5 mile east of 25th Avenue. The site corresponds to a portion of Section 36, Township 24 South, and Range 19 East of the Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (MDBM) of the “Avenal Gap” topographic quadrangles 7.5- minute quadrangle (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] 2015). Project Description: The Project includes the development of up to a 5-megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generating facility and battery storage system (BESS) facility on ±30 acres of 40 undeveloped acres. The facility would consist of solar PV modules mounted on stationary fixed-tilt, ground- mounted racking or single-axis trackers and would include up to 5-MW alternating current (AC) maximum capacity, four-hour battery energy storage system. At peak production, the 5-MW solar energy storage facility would supply enough clean energy to power up to 1,250 residential homes per year. Electricity generated by the site would be sold to an electric utility purchaser or another power purchaser under a long-term contract, power purchase agreement (PPA), or via the California Independent System Operator wholesale electricity markets. The Project includes the following physical site improvement components: Installation of solar PV modules mounted on stationary fixed-tilt, ground-mounted racking or single-axis trackers; PV panel support structures; Draft IS and MND 1 November 2019 Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project Battery storage system enclosures; Combiner boxes, electrical inverters, and transformers; Overhead and buried electrical conduit, transmission, and collection lines; Data monitoring equipment; All-weather access road; Onsite, unpaved interior roads (i.e., drive aisles) and perimeter road conforming to Kings County Improvement Standards; and Wildlife permeable security fencing The Project requires an application for Kings County review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the construction of a solar energy facility. If constructed in a single phase, up to 14 months would be needed. However, the Project may be constructed in multiple phases with timing determined by electricity market demand. The Project is anticipated to operate for a period of up to 30 years. After the estimated 30-year Project service life, the Project would be decommissioned, and the Project site returned to its pre-Project condition. Construction. Construction of the Project would require temporary containers with equipment in designated areas. The areas would be prepared with a compacted road base that would allow trucks to enter the site and deliver materials. During construction, the foundations for the racking system(s) may require the use of a pile driver. It is anticipated that the workforce during the construction period would peak at 30 employees. Operation. During Project operations, two or three offsite employees would be reserved for maintenance and would be dispatched to the site for routine scheduled maintenance and on an as-needed basis for unscheduled maintenance. Vehicles for operation and maintenance would typically include trucks such as pickups or flatbeds, as well as water trucks for solar panel washing. Large heavy-haul transport equipment may be brought to the site infrequently for equipment repair or replacement. Regional access to the Project site includes I-5, SR-33, SR-41, and SR-46, with direct access to the site proposed via a farm road accessed from 25th Avenue or King Road. Public Review Period: November 15 – December 16. Draft IS and MND 2 November 2019 Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects: Biological Resources Mitigation Measures BIO-1 Preconstruction Surveys for Burrowing Owl: Preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. The surveys shall follow the methods described in the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW’s) Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012). Two surveys shall be conducted, with the first survey being scheduled between 30 and 14 days before initial ground disturbance (grading, grubbing, and construction), and the second survey being conducted no more than 24 hours prior to initial ground disturbance. If burrowing owls and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows are identified on the Project site during the survey, consultation with CDFW and the Kings County Community Development Agency (CDA) shall take place and methods listed in the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012) for avoidance and/or passive relocation shall be followed. Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction Monitoring/Enforcement: Kings County BIO-2 Preconstruction Survey for San Joaquin Kit Fox and American Badger: A preconstruction survey for San Joaquin kit fox and American badger shall be conducted between 30 and 14 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities or any Project activity likely to impact San Joaquin kit fox. The survey shall be conducted according to the guidelines listed in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011). If San Joaquin kit fox or American badger and/or suitable San Joaquin kit fox or American badger dens are identified on the Project site during the preconstruction survey, consultation with CDFW, USFWS, and the Kings County CDA shall take place before proceeding and shall follow the USFWS guidelines for avoidance, exclusion, and/or passive relocation. Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction Monitoring/Enforcement: Kings County BIO-3 Preconstruction Burrow Survey for Special-Status Small Mammal Species and Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard: Special-status small mammal and blunt-nosed leopard lizard are dependent on burrows to survive. Therefore, a preconstruction burrow survey for San Joaquin antelope squirrel, giant kangaroo rat, Tipton kangaroo rat, and blunt-nosed leopard lizard shall be conducted to determine if there are suitable burrows for these species on the Project site. The survey should be conducted by a biologist experienced in identifying small mammal burrows. The survey should consist of walking the entire Project site and identifying all burrows suitable for special-status small mammals and blunt-nosed leopard lizard. All small mammal burrows shall be marked with a Global Positioning System unit and avoided by construction. A 50-foot disturbance limit buffer will be placed around all identified small mammal burrows. The burrow and associated buffer must be avoided by construction; if avoidance of suitable small mammal burrows is not possible, Draft IS and MND 3 November 2019 Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project the Project shall conduct focused surveys for special-status small mammal species and blunt- nosed leopard lizard according to the accepted USFWS and/or CDFW protocols. If special-status small mammal species or blunt-nosed leopard lizard are identified on the Project site during the focused surveys, the Project shall initiate consultation with USFWS, CDFW, and the Kings County CDA to obtain the necessary incidental take permit authorizations or provided evidence that such a permit is not required before proceeding. Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction Monitoring/Enforcement: Kings County BIO-4 Preconstruction Nesting Bird and Raptor Survey: If construction or other Project activities are scheduled to occur during the bird breeding season (February through August for raptors and March through August for most other birds), a pre-construction nesting-bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. The survey shall be completed no more than 14 days prior to initial ground disturbance. The nesting-bird survey shall include the Project site and adjacent areas where Project activities have the potential to cause nest failure. If any active nests are identified, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate disturbance-limit buffer around the nest using flagging or staking. Construction activities will need to be avoided within any disturbance-limit buffer zones until the nest is deemed no longer active by the biologist. Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction Monitoring/Enforcement: Kings County BIO-5 Rare
Recommended publications
  • Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics

    Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics

    Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on September 16, 2019, GCU-2019-0004 Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics The increasing presence of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems (sometimes referred to as solar farms) is a rather new development in North Carolina’s landscape. Due to the new and unknown nature of this technology, it is natural for communities near such developments to be concerned about health and safety impacts. Unfortunately, the quick emergence of utility-scale solar has cultivated fertile grounds for myths and half-truths about the health impacts of this technology, which can lead to unnecessary fear and conflict. Photovoltaic (PV) technologies and solar inverters are not known to pose any significant health dangers to their neighbors. The most important dangers posed are increased highway traffic during the relative short construction period and dangers posed to trespassers of contact with high voltage equipment. This latter risk is mitigated by signage and the security measures that industry uses to deter trespassing. As will be discussed in more detail below, risks of site contamination are much less than for most other industrial uses because PV technologies employ few toxic chemicals and those used are used in very small quantities. Due to the reduction in the pollution from fossil-fuel-fired electric generators, the overall impact of solar development on human health is overwhelmingly positive. This pollution reduction results from a partial replacement of fossil-fuel fired generation by emission-free PV-generated electricity, which reduces harmful sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5).
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives

    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives

    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
  • US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009

    US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009

    US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009 Thursday, April 15, 2010 575 7th Street NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20004 | www.seia.org Executive Summary U.S. Cumulative Solar Capacity Growth Despite the Great Recession of 2009, the U.S. solar energy 2,500 25,000 23,835 industry grew— both in new installations and 2,000 20,000 employment. Total U.S. solar electric capacity from 15,870 2,108 photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) 1,500 15,000 technologies climbed past 2,000 MW, enough to serve -th MW more than 350,000 homes. Total U.S. solar thermal 1,000 10,000 MW 1 capacity approached 24,000 MWth. Solar industry 494 revenues also surged despite the economy, climbing 500 5,000 36 percent in 2009. - - A doubling in size of the residential PV market and three new CSP plants helped lift the U.S. solar electric market 37 percent in annual installations over 2008 from 351 MW in 2008 to 481 MW in 2009. Solar water heating (SWH) Electricity Capacity (MW) Thermal Capacity (MW-Th) installations managed 10 percent year-over-year growth, while the solar pool heating (SPH) market suffered along Annual U.S. Solar Energy Capacity Growth with the broader construction industry, dropping 10 1,200 1,099 percent. 1,036 1,000 918 894 928 Another sign of continued optimism in solar energy: 865 -th 725 758 742 venture capitalists invested more in solar technologies than 800 542 any other clean technology in 2009. In total, $1.4 billion in 600 481 2 351 venture capital flowed to solar companies in 2009.
  • Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL

    Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL

    Arizona’s Energy Future 99th Arizona Town Hall November 6 - 9, 2011 Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL PREMIER PARTNER CONTRIBUTING PARTNER COLLABORATING PARTNERS SUPPORTING PARTNERS CIVIC PARTNERS CORE Construction Kennedy Partners Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite Sundt Construction One East Camelback, Suite 530, Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Phone: 602.252.9600 Fax: 602.252.6189 Website: www.aztownhall.org Email: [email protected] ARIZONA’S ENERGY FUTURE September 2011 We thank you for making the commitment to participate in the 99th Arizona Town Hall to be held at the Grand Canyon on November 6-9, 2011. You will be discussing and developing consensus with fellow Arizonans on the future of energy in Arizona. An essential element to the success of these consensus-driven discussions is this background report that is provided to all participants before the Town Hall convenes. As they have so often done for past Arizona Town Halls, Arizona State University has prepared a detailed and informative report that will provide a unique and unparalleled resource for your Town Hall panel sessions. Special thanks go to editors Clark Miller and Sharlissa Moore of the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes at ASU for spearheading this effort and marshaling many talented professionals to write individual chapters. For sharing their wealth of knowledge and professional talents, our thanks go to the many authors who contributed to the report. Our deepest gratitude also goes to University Vice President and Dean of the College of Public Programs for ASU, Debra Friedman, and Director of the School of Public Affairs for ASU, Jonathan Koppell, who made great efforts to ensure that ASU could provide this type of resource to Arizona.
  • Midamerican May 10 Stevens Test.Pdf

    Midamerican May 10 Stevens Test.Pdf

    STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BEFORE THE IOWA STATE UTILITIES BOARD __________________________________________________________________ IN RE: : : APPLICATION OF MIDAMERICAN : DOCKET NO. RPU-2013- ENERGY COMPANY FOR A : DETERMINATION OF : RATEMAKING PRINCIPLES : ____________________________________:______________________________ DIRECT TESTIMONY OF O. DALE STEVENS, II 1 Q. Please state your name and business address for the record. 2 A. O. Dale Stevens, II, 4299 Northwest Urbandale Drive, Urbandale, Iowa 50322. 3 Q. By who are you employed and in what position? 4 A. I am employed by MidAmerican Energy Company as Manager, Market 5 Assessment. 6 Q. Please describe your responsibilities as Manager, Market Assessment. 7 A. I am responsible for overseeing the electric market price forecasts, fuel market 8 projections, resource planning and evaluation, electric transmission analyses and 9 environmental modeling. 10 Q. Please describe your education and business experience. 11 A. I graduated from the University of Missouri at Rolla with a Bachelor of Science 12 degree in Electrical Engineering in 1972. Since that time, I have been employed 13 by MidAmerican Energy Company (“MidAmerican” or “Company”), its 14 predecessors, or its affiliates, in a variety of planning and managerial positions. I 15 joined Iowa Power and Light Company, a predecessor of the Company, in 1972 16 as a Scheduler. During my career, I have worked in System Planning (1974- 1 1980), Operational Planning (1980-1986), Rates (1986-1995) and Market 2 Assessment (1995-present). In 1991, I was promoted to manager of the Electric 3 Rate Department for Midwest Power Systems Inc., a predecessor of the Company. 4 In 1995, I assumed the role of manager of Market Assessment for MidAmerican, 5 the position I hold today.
  • Standards and Requirements for Solar Equipment, Installation, and Licensing and Certification a Guide for States and Municipalities

    Standards and Requirements for Solar Equipment, Installation, and Licensing and Certification a Guide for States and Municipalities

    SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT Beren Argetsinger, Keyes&FoxLLP•BenjaminInskeep,EQResearchLLC Beren Argetsinger, A GuideforStatesandMunicipalities and LicensingCertification for SolarEquipment,Installation, Standards andRequirements FEBRU A RY 2017 RY © B igstock/ilfede SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT ABOUT THIS GUIDE AND THE SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT Standards and Requirements for Solar Equipment, Installation, and Licensing and Certification: A Guide for States and Municipalities is one of six program guides being produced by the Clean Energy States Alliance (CESA) as part of its Sustainable Solar Ed- ucation Project. The project aims to provide information and educational resources to help states and municipalities ensure that distributed solar electricity remains consumer friendly and its benefits are accessible to low- and moderate-income households. In ad- dition to publishing guides, the Sustainable Solar Education Project will produce webinars, an online course, a monthly newsletter, and in-person training on topics related to strengthening solar accessibility and affordability, improving consumer information, and implementing consumer protection measures regarding solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. More information about the project, including a link to sign up to receive notices about the project’s activities, can be found at www.cesa.org/projects/sustainable-solar. ABOUT THE U.S. DEpaRTMENT OF ENERGY SUNSHOT INITIATIVE The U.S. Department of Energy SunShot Initiative is a collaborative national effort that aggressively drives innovation to make solar energy fully cost-competitive with traditional energy sources before the end of the decade. Through SunShot, the Energy Department supports efforts by private companies, universities, and national laboratories to drive down the cost of solar electricity to $0.06 per kilowatt-hour.
  • Shining Light on Solar Energy Prospects in Iowa: Decorah & the Path to Iowa’S Energy Future

    Shining Light on Solar Energy Prospects in Iowa: Decorah & the Path to Iowa’S Energy Future

    SHINING LIGHT ON SOLAR ENERGY PROSPECTS IN IOWA: DECORAH & THE PATH TO IOWA’S ENERGY FUTURE John Keane Sadia Khan Jamie Krieg Daniel Noonan Jordan Oster Allen Zagoren DO, MPA (Professor) Drake University Master of Public Administration (MPA) Program Capstone Table of Contents ABSTRACT …………………………………………...…………………………………………2 BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………………………3 NET METERING………………………………………………………………………………10 EXECUTIVE-LEVEL POLICY……………………………………………… ....................... 13 LEGISLATION………………………………………………………………………………...15 EAGLE POINT DECISION…………………………………………………………………...17 CASE STUDY: DECORAH…………………………………………………………………...18 PILOT PROGRAM…………………………………………………………………………….32 RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………………………………….33 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………35 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………37 WORK CITED………………………………………………………………………………….38 1 | P a g e Abstract The sun is our most impressive source of energy. More than one million times the earth’s size, every year the sun provides ten times more energy than is stored in all the world’s reserves of coal and oil. The amount and intensity of sunlight varies by location, climate conditions, as well as daily and seasonal trends. Although southern states such as Arizona, California, and New Mexico receive the most sunlight during the year, Iowa ranks among the top third in the United States in the technical potential for solar energy production. Iowa’s 16th-place ranking puts it ahead of many states to the south including Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. Iowa’s rooftop solar energy potential alone could meet close to 20% of Iowa’s annual electric needs under optimal conditions. The decentralized approach to electricity generation through the creation of small-scale and distributed energy facilities has done wonders for solar proliferation in the state of Iowa as well as had a positive impact on the state’s economic development. Solar energy in Iowa now powers farms, businesses, universities, utilities, communities, and industries, as well as vehicles, and homes in the state.
  • COMPLIANCE7-03-00, Mojave Solar Project 2019 Annual Compliance Report (09-AFC-5C) Part 1

    COMPLIANCE7-03-00, Mojave Solar Project 2019 Annual Compliance Report (09-AFC-5C) Part 1

    DOCKETED Docket Number: 09-AFC-05C Project Title: Abengoa Mojave Compliance TN #: 232295 COMPLIANCE7-03-00, Mojave Solar Project 2019 Annual Document Title: Compliance Report (09-AFC-5C) part 1 COMPLIANCE7-03-00, Mojave Solar Project 2019 Annual Description: Compliance Report (09-AFC-5C) part 1 Filer: Jose Manuel Bravo Romero Organization: Mojave Solar Project Submitter Role: Applicant Submission Date: 3/4/2020 7:46:58 AM Docketed Date: 3/4/2020 Mojave Solar LLC 42134 Harper Lake Road Phone: 760 308 0400 Hinkley, California 92347 SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY Subject: 09-AFC-5C Condition Number: Compliance 7 Description: Mojave Solar Project 2019 Annual Compliance Report Submittal Number: COMPLIANCE7-03-00 Distribution: Keith Winstead, CEC; Kara Harris, US DOE; Dr. Sharma Shankar CDFW; Ray Bransfield, USFWS; Thomas Dietsch, USFWS February 2, 2020 Keith Winstead Compliance Project Manager California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-2000 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] Dear Mr. Winstead, The attached Mojave Solar Project 2019 Annual Compliance Report (09-AFC-5C) is submitted for your review as part of the ongoing reporting required by the California Energy Commission’s Conditions of Certification for the Mojave Solar Project. Sincerely, Jose Manuel Bravo Romero Manager Compliance, Permitting, Quality and Environment Department ASI Operations LLC Mojave Solar Project 42134 Harper Lake Rd Hinkley, CA 92347 (303) 378-7302 MPDQXHOEUDYR#DWODQWLFD\LHOGFRP Attachment: 09-AFC-5C Mojave Solar Project 2019 Annual Compliance Report. 09-AFC-5C Mojave Solar Project Annual Compliance Report 2019 reporting period Prepared by: AS Industrial Operations LLC . for Mojave Solar LLC 42134 Harper Lake Road Hinkley, California 92347 Mojave Solar LLC 42134 Harper Lake Road Phone: 760 308 0400 Hinkley, California 92347 Subject: 09-AFC-5C Condition Number: COMPLIANCE-7 Description: Annual Compliance Report – 2019.
  • Altamont Solar Energy Center Project

    Altamont Solar Energy Center Project

    Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Altamont Solar Energy Center Project Prepared for: Alameda County Planning Department 224 West Winton Avenue, Suite 111 Hayward, CA 94544 Contact: J. Weldon 510/670-5400 Prepared by: ICF International 75 East Santa Clara Street, Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95113 Contact: C. Fukasawa 408/216-2811 August 2011 ICF International. August 2011. Altamont Solar Energy Center Project Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study. Prepared for Alameda County, CA (Project #: 0090.10). Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................... iv Page A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED.............................. 13 C. LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION ......................................................................... 13 D. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ................................................. 14 1. AESTHETICS .................................................................................................................. 17 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES ............................................................
  • Office of Consumer Advocate

    Office of Consumer Advocate

    PUBLIC OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE DIRECT WORKPAPER OF DR. XIAOCHUAN (LARRY) SHI IN RE: MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO. ARC-2015-0156 January 29, 2016 OCA Shi Workpaper Page 2 of 173 ARC-2015-0156 OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE DATA REQUEST DATE : November 11, 2015 DOCKET NO. : ARC-2015-0156 COMPANY : MidAmerican Energy Company SUBJECT : 199 IAC 20.13(1)“j” REFERENCE : Additional Information ordered by the Board Generation which may need to be added to address projected capacity shortfall Responder Name: Neil Hammer Phone: 515-252-6407 Job Title: Director, Market Assessment 3. MidAmerican plans to purchase Zonal Resource Credits (“paper” capacity) to meet its short-term resource adequacy needs for Iowa and South Dakota through the five-year period ending with the 2020-2021 Planning Year. Please provide the following information as regards to MidAmerican’s long-term resource adequacy plans beyond the 2020-2021 Planning Year. A. The latest copy of MidAmerican’s long-term Integrated Resource Plan (IRP); B. Explain the major assumptions used to develop the plan, including but not limited to, demand (MW) forecasting, energy assumption (GWh) forecasting, fuel costs, fixed and variable O&M costs, environmental costs, and costs for constructing new units; C. Describe the software MidAmerican used to develop its long-term generation expansion IRP; and D. Provide a copy of the software package referenced in response to C above and the database used to generate the IRP plan referenced in A above. Response: A. “Integrated Resource Plan” is a term not used in Chapter 476 of the Iowa Code. However, Iowa Code § 476.53 does provide that in order to receive advance ratemaking principles for qualified new generation, a utility must have a Board-approved energy efficiency plan in place and demonstrate that the proposed new generating facility is reasonable when compared to other feasible alternatives.

  • Market Trends 2 013

    U.S. Solar MARKET TRENDS 2 013 JULY 2014 Larry Sherwood U.S. Solar MARKET TRENDS 2 013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Solar energy markets are booming in the United Important CURRENT TRENDS States due to falling photovoltaic (PV) prices, strong consumer demand, available financing, Photovoltaic JULY 2014 Larry Sherwood renewable portfolio standards (RPSs), and • California was the most important market financial incentives from the federal government, in 2013. Fifty-seven percent of U.S. capacity states and utilities. Thirty-four percent more PV installed in 2013 occurred in the Golden State, capacity was installed in 2013 than the year and the capacity installed during 2013 was 161 before. Developers completed three large percent greater than what was installed concentrating solar power (CSP) plants with a in 2012. combined capacity of nearly 0.8 GWAC at the • Residential capacity installed in 2013 grew by end of 2013. Solar installations accounted for 68 percent in the U.S., fueled by the increasing 31 percent of all electric power installations use of leases and third-party ownership of these completed in 2013. systems. Over 145,000 residential PV systems were installed during the year. The federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) of 30 percent of the installed cost is an important • Utility sector capacity installed grew by 47 foundational incentive for most installations. percent. Ten PV installations, each larger than 100 MW , were completed in 2013. Installed prices for distributed PV installations fell DC by at least 11 percent in 2013 and have fallen by • Hawaii had the highest per capita installed 44 percent since 2009.

  • Sunshot Vision Study: February 2012

    SunShot Vision Study February 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The U.S. Department of Energy would like to acknowledge the project coordination and in-depth analysis conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the contributions by the Solar Energy Industries Association, Solar Electric Power Association, and the many organizations that participated in the development of this report. The preparation and production of this report was coordinated by New West Technologies, LLC, Energetics Incorporated, and NREL. All contributors to the report are listed in Appendix D. Cover photo renderings by Joshua Bauer, NREL MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF THE SUNSHOT INITIATIVE The SunShot Initiative was launched in February 2011 with the goal of making solar energy cost- competitive with conventional electricity generating technologies within the decade. Achieving this goal will require dramatic decreases in the cost structure of solar technologies—on the order of a 75% reduction—across all markets including residential, commercial, and utility-scale deployments of solar. To do this most effectively, the SunShot Initiative spans the full spectrum from basic science to applied research and development. It also spans across multiple U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) offices, including Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy (ARPA-E) and the Office of Science (SC). The SunShot Vision Study explores the implications of achieving the SunShot Initiative’s targets both in terms of potential benefits as well as potential challenges. The potential benefits include solar contributing an increasingly significant share of electricity generation over the next 20 to 40 years, creating thousands of new jobs, and saving consumers money by placing downward pressure on electricity prices.