Rakia-Amended-Particulars-Of-Claim

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rakia-Amended-Particulars-Of-Claim IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ru ~ ~T~~nv nTvrcrnrr BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES BUSINESS LIST(ChD) Claim No: HC-2016-002798 Amended Particulars of Claim under CPR rule 17.1(2)(a) Re-Amended Particulars of Claim by Order of His Honour Judge Kramer dated 18 July 2018 ~i'/_~I ~I~A RAS AL KHAIMAH INVESTMENT AUTHORITY Claimant and - FARIIAD AZIMA Defendant RE-AMENDED PARTICULARS OF CLAIM THE PARTIES 1. The Claimant (`RAKIA') is the investment authority of the Emirate of Ras Al Khaimah, and has its office address at Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates, P.O. Box 31291. 2. The Defendant (`Mr Azima') is an individual resident in the United States of America, whose current or last known address is 5921 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, Missouri 64113. THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 3. Mr Azima is the 100% shareholder in HeavyLift International Airlines (`HeavyLift'), a company incorporated in the United Arab Emirates with its office address at Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, PO Box 9061. HeavyLift was purportedly struck off the register of Sharjah free zone of companies around Apri12013. 4. On 2 March 2016, RAKIA entered into a written settlement agreement with Mr Azima and purportedly HeavyLift (the `Settlement Agreement'). A true copy of the Settlement Agreement is appended to these Particulars of Claim at appendix 1. 4A. The recitals to the Settlement Agreement referred to the joint venture agreement entered between HeavyLift and the former national airline of Ras Al Khaimah, RAK Airways PJSC ("RAK Airways") on 12 April 2007 concerning the establishment of an aircraft simulator and training facility at Ras Al Khaimah International Airport (the "Training 1 14593993-3 Academy Joint Venture"). The recitals recorded that, "HeavyLift, acting through Mr Azima, has asserted that RAK Airways owes HeavyLiftfor investments HeavyLift made in the joint venture pursuant to the Joint Venture AgreemenP' and that the parties to the Settlement Agreement "wishe[dJ to resolve all outstanding issues Yelating to the Joint Venture Agreement". The Settlement Agreement then set out the terms on which the parties had agreed to settle any claims that Mr Azima or HeavyLift may have against RAKIA or any other RAK entity. FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION CONCERNING THE AMOUNTS INVESTED BY HEAVYLIFT IN THE TRAINING ACADEMY JOINT VENTURE 4B. The parties' respective obligations in respect of the Training Academy Joint Venture were recorded in a joint venture agreement dated 12 April 2007 (the "Training Academy JVA"). The Training Academy JVA was signed by Mr Azima, on behalf of HeavyLift, and by Dr Massaad on behalf of both RAK Airways (as a party) and RAKIA (as guarantor of RAK Airways' performance under the Training Academy JVA). Under the terms of the Training Academy JVA, the parties agreed that HeavyLift would, among other things, provide and maintain a working DC-8 flight simulator, while RAK Airways would construct an appropriate facility to house the simulator. A RAK Free Zone company, RAK-HeavyLift Training Academy FZ-LLC, was incorporated on 11 April 2017 for the purpose of implementing and running the Training Academy Joint Venture. 4C. Pursuant to the Training Academy JVA, RAK Airways constructed a building to house the Training Academy at Ras Al Khaimah International Airport. HeavyLift subsequently installed asecond-hand DC-8 aircraft simulator, which it had previously acquired from MK Airways Limited for a total cost of US$167,500, in that building. 4D. The Training Academy opened for business in late 2007. It operated for several years until RAK Airways and HeavyLift jointly decided to close the Training Academy and to terminate the Training Academy Joint Venture. 4E. On 2 September 2013, Ray Adams (acting on behalf of Mr Azima) sent a letter to the then Chief Executive Officer of RAKIA, Jim Stewart, concerning "unresolved" matters regarding the Training Academy Joint Venture. The letter alleged that RAK Airways had failed to fulfil its obligations in respect of the Training Academy Joint Venture and alleged that RAKIA was therefore obligated to reimburse the substantial expenses that HeavyLift had incurred in performing its obligations in relation to the joint venture. The letter stated: "A substantial investment was undertaken by HeavyLift on behalf of the joint venture. That investment includes, among other things: 2 14593993-3 1. Cash, training materials, and equipment of approximately $2,260,000 USD. 2. Staff and management time and related costs contributed by our US company. [...] [D]ue to the failure of RAK Airways to provide its share of the joint venture investment, the amount HeavyLift has already disbursed needs to be repaid." 4F. On 6 July 2015, Afsaneh Azadeh (acting on behalf of Mr Azima) emailed a letter to Jamie Buchanan on behalf of RAKIA (copying Mr Azima) regarding the Training Academy Joint Venture. The letter stated amongst other things that prior to its termination "HeavyLift had already invested $2.5 million" to the Training Academy Joint Venture. The letter further stated that while hard copies of the Training Academy Joint Venture's audited accounts for 2007 and 2008 were not available, an extract from the "Director's Report and Balance Sheet Signature page" showed that as of 31 December 2008 the "Total Investment by HeavyLift" in the Training Academy Joint Venture was $2,582,881, which included a "Capital Contribution" of $1,000,000, "Share Capital" of $40,000 plus a further investment of $1,542,881 "Due to Related Parties ". 4G. In October 2015, Mr Buchanan engaged in email correspondence with Ms Azadeh (acting on behalf of Mr Azima) concerning a possible settlement of any potential claims that HeavyLift might have against RAKIA arising from the Training Academy Joint Venture. During that exchange of communications, Mr Buchanan explained that he required further information in respect of the losses that it was claimed HeavyLift had sustained as a result of RAK Airways' alleged breaches of the Training Academy JVA. In particular: 4G.1 On 21 October 2015, Mr Buchanan sent an email to Ms Azadeh stating that he was in the process of compiling "a list of questions" and that, "Subject to youY responses, we can then get to the heart ofwhat may be due to you." 4G.2 On 27 October 2015, Mr Buchanan sent a further email to Ms Azadeh in which he stated that: "I will hopefully get my questions to you by close of business Sunday 1 November. The answeYs will then enable me to assess the value ofamounts owing, ifany." 4H. On 29 October 2015, Mr Buchanan sent an email to Mr Azima concerning the Training Academy Joint Venture. The email contained a timeline of events concerning the Training Academy Joint Venture and referred to previous statements by Mr Azima that HeavyLift was entitled to approximately US$2.5 million in respect of the Training Academy Joint Venture. Mr Buchanan asked Mr Azima to clarify the amount that HeavyLift claimed to have lost as a result of the alleged breaches of the Training Academy JVA and to provide an explanation of the basis for those calculations: 3 14593993-3 "In order to clarify matters, I should be grateful if you would provide me with information on the following: Details please of the basis of the claims with reference to the JV: which particular provisions of the JV do you say have been breached? Where you say breaches have occurred can you please let me know what loss you say has been caused by those breaches. It would be helpful if you could provide evidence as to how you have calculated the loss." 4I. On 10 November 2015, Mr Azima forwarded an email to Mr Buchanan that contained several references to the amount HeavyLift had invested in the Training Academy Joint Venture. The email attached a number of documents and explained that: "I attach for your review the following: 1. Copy of Signed JV Agreement on the RAK-HeavyLift Training Academy signed by RAK Airways with performance guaranteed by RAKIA. 2. Copy of 2013.09.02 Letter to Jim Stewart(who at the time was running RAKIA)outlining our claim for loss. 3. Copy of 2015.05.31 Statement of Account outlining in detail our loss. 4. Copy of the 2008.1231 [sic] Management Accounts Balance Sheet on RAK-HeavyLift Training Academy which reflects the $2,260,000 investment of HeavyLift in the assets of the Academy. 5. Copy of the first 2 pages of the 2007 audit of RAK-HeavyLift Training Academy which supports the $2,260,000 investment shown in the Management Accounts. Unfortunately, the audit reports were in my office at the Academy and were destroyed after we were instructed to vacate and leave the building. We were also instructed to leave all records. We left all records in the care and custody of RAK Airways. Total Loss Per Statement of Account = $2,260,000 + $425,000 = $2,685,000." 4J. The attachments to the email referred to at paragraph 4I above included: 4J.1 A "Statement ofAccount" dated 31 May 2015, which stated amongst other things that (i) RAK-HeavyLift Training Academy FZ-LLC had received a fixed asset investment totaling US$2,260,000, which included expenditure of US$1,726,000 in respect of "Simulator (including installation &certification)" and (ii) there had been a further investment of US$425,000 in the company in the form of "Staff&Related Costsfrom US Company". 4J.2 A "Comparative Balance Sheet" which stated amongst other things that as at 31 December 2007 and 31 December 2008, RAK-HeavyLift Training Academy FZ- LLC owned a flight simulator worth US$1,725,959. 4K. On 14 November 2015, Mr Buchanan sent an email to Mr Azima stating that: "I have now reviewed Ray's email and have been authorised to verify the 4 14593993-3 various valuations referenced in his email.
Recommended publications
  • Rak Investment Authority Government of Ras Al Khaimah Ras Al Khaimah United Arab Emirates
    RAK INVESTMENT AUTHORITY GOVERNMENT OF RAS AL KHAIMAH RAS AL KHAIMAH UNITED ARAB EMIRATES CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) PERIOD ENDED 30 JUNE 2008 RAK INVESTMENT AUTHORITY GOVERNMENT OF RAS AL KHAIMAH RAS AL KHAIMAH UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Table of Contents Page Exhibit Independent Auditor’s Report on Review of Consolidated Condensed Interim Financial Information 1 -- Consolidated Condensed Interim Balance Sheet (Unaudited) 2 A Consolidated Condensed Interim Statement of Income (Unaudited) 3 B Consolidated Condensed Interim Statement of Changes in Equity 4 C (Unaudited) Consolidated Condensed Interim Statement of Cash Flows 5 D (Unaudited) Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited) 6 – 16 -- RAK INVESTMENT AUTHORITY GOVERNMENT OF RAS AL KHAIMAH RAS AL KHAIMAH UNITED ARAB EMIRATES CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED INTERIM STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 30 JUNE 2008 (UNAUDITED) EXHIBIT B Six-Months Period Ended Three Months Period Ended Note 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 2008 2007 2008 2007 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) AED AED AED AED Revenue 88,190,235 59,557,607 46,921,375 37,971,936 Direct expenses (15,845,550) (18,942,302) (6,997,208) (11,317,138) __________ _________ _________ ___________ Gross profit 72,344,685 40,615,305 39,924,167 26,654,798 Other income 20,266,978 6,069,364 12,416,235 3,772,574 Marketing expenses (6,696,784) (10,427,636) (3,426,662) (5,284,947) Administrative expenses (14,823,885) (19,895,833) (3,065,104) (12,913,033) Finance costs
    [Show full text]
  • MIDRMA Board/13-WP/6 3/03/2014 International Civil Aviation
    MIDRMA Board/13-WP/6 3/03/2014 International Civil Aviation Organization Middle East Regional Monitoring Agency Board Thirteenth Meeting (MIDRMA Board/13) (Bahrain, 9 –12 March 2014) Agenda Item 4: RVSM Monitoring and Related Technical Issues MID STATES MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (Presented by MIDRMA) SUMMARY The aim of this working paper is to address the RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) applicable for each MIDRMA Member State. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES − ATM/AIM/SAR SG/13 Report − ICAO Doc 9547 − ICAO doc 9937 − ICAO Annex 6 Part I − MIDANPIRG/14 Report − MID RVSM SMR 2012-2013 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The height-keeping performance of aircraft is a key element in ensuring the safe operations of RVSM airspace. The RVSM height monitoring standards are considered the minimum requirement needed to maintain the safety of operations in the RVSM designated airspace. 1.2 Upon changes to ICAO Annex 6, Operation of Aircraft, Parts I & II, applicable on 18 November 2010, the following standard was adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO): 7.2.7 The State of the Operator that has issued an RVSM approval to an operator shall establish a requirement which ensures that a minimum of two aeroplanes of each aircraft type grouping of the operator have their height-keeping performance monitored, at least once every two years or within intervals of 1000 flight hours per aeroplane, whichever period is longer. If an operator aircraft type grouping consists of a single aeroplane, monitoring of that aeroplane shall be accomplished within the specified period.
    [Show full text]
  • Airworthiness Consultative Committee Meeting Thursday 28Th November 2013 Radisson Blue Hotel, Yas Island, Abu Dhabi
    Minutes of 10th Airworthiness Consultative Committee Meeting Thursday 28th November 2013 Radisson Blue Hotel, Yas Island, Abu Dhabi Meeting attended by: NAME TITLE Industry Kostas Kanavarakis Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies John Scott‐Laws Aerogulf John Dunne Al Jaber Aviation Les A. Boe Al Jaber Aviation Igor Gavrilenko Amikon Aviation Training Larisa Gavrilenko Amikon Aviation Training John Ramsell AMMROC Patis Yurdakul Asscom M.E. Djordje Petrovic Avisa Gulf Arnel Odeste Belgraver M.E. Mukhtar Khalid Belgraver M.E. Nadia Konzali COSCAP‐GS Jasim Hassan Emirates Airlines Mark Robinson Emirates Airlines Youssef Bahsoun Emirates Airlines Jibran Abbas Emirates Aviation Services Satyabrata Ghosh Emirates Aviation Services Harish Sadarangani Empire Aviation Group Masoud Al Alawi Etihad Airways Raza Khan Etihad Airways Shabbir Khan Etihad Airways John Crook ExecuJet Aviation Group Liam Doyle ExecuJet Aviation Group Mark Fitzpatrick ExecuJet Aviation Group Matthew Withers ExecuJet Aviation Group George Ronaldson Falcon Aviation Services Kevin Culbert Falcon Aviation Services Philip Bailey Falcon Aviation Services Heinz‐Juergen Haak First Emirates Aviation Group K. Sathappan First Emirates Aviation Group David Lewis Fly Dubai Mick Hills Fly Dubai Christian Hollyer Gama Aviation Darryl Jackson Gama Aviation Aleksandar Veljkovic Global Jet GJ Ayman Sarhan Global Jet Khaled Abu Shawar Global Jet Mohammad Khalid Baig Horizon International Flight Academy Patrick McDonald‐Meyer Jet‐Ops Rohinton Rustom Irani Livewel Aircraft Maintenance Ruslan Semych
    [Show full text]
  • Air Arabia Growth and Turbulence in the Desert
    Air Arabia Growth and turbulence in the desert INVESTMENT RESEARCH INITIATION OF COVERAGE | August 10, 2008 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Hassan Awan Tel: +971 (2) 619 2369 [email protected] Brian Davidson Tel: +971 (2) 619 2322 [email protected] Last Price: AED 1.56 Stock Rating Price Target: AED 1.82 UNDERPRICED Sector: Transport BLOOMBERG : AIRARABI REUTERS : AIRA.DU Disclaimer The Report prepared by TNI (TNI means “The National Investor” wherever mentioned) does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the securities or any related securities of the subject company. The report is meant for named recipients only and should not be reproduced or distributed without prior written consent from TNI. The recommendations in this report are solely based on research and analysis performed by our investment research department using the information currently available which we believe to be reliable. We believe that the opinion expressed herein reflects all the available public information underlying the se curity of the subject company at the time of preparing this report and should not be considered as any assurance as to the future performance of the security from TNI and/or its directors or any of its employees. The price behavior of the security may mate rially differ from the opinion expressed herein, if some non public information at the time of preparing this research report, that has the potential to materially affect the price of the security, is made public subsequent to the release of this report. TNI has not considered the particular investment objectives, financial situation or risk profile of the intended recipients while preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rogue State Within the UAE?
    Ras Al Khaimah: A Rogue State Within The UAE? February 8, 2010 This informational material is distributed by Mercury Public Affairs LLC, Registration Number 5953 under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, 22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq, on behalf of its foreign principal His Highness Sheikh Khalid bin Saqr Al Qasimi. Additional information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia. A Rogue State Within the UAE? CONTENTS Overview ........................................................................................................................3 Key Findings ..................................................................................................................4 Iran and Ras Al Khaimah ...............................................................................................5 Isfahan City Center ................................................................................................5 RAK Ceramics .........................................................................................................6 Iranian Activity in the RAK Free Trade Zone ...........................................................7 Gas, Oil and Pipeline Projects ..................................................................................8 Diamonds ....................................................................................................................14 Sunni Extremists and Al Qaeda ....................................................................................20 RAK Ofshore: the Cayman
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Key factors in the UAE’s successful economic performance have been a strong oil market, development of public joint stock companies, enlargement of free zones, a buoyant local stock market and launches of several new mega-projects. 71 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THE ECONOMY A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF FISCAL DEFICITS in the UAE’s consolidated government financial accounts came to an end in 2005 when it posted a Dh38.2 billion surplus. Public revenues rose by 69.3 per cent to reach Dh160.5 billion, while public spending increased Astute economic by 27 per cent to reach Dh122.3 billion. The resulting surplus policies provided contrasted with a deficit of Dh1.5 billion in 2004. This surge in solid foundations public finances was primarily due to the increase in oil and gas for impressive revenues, which rose by 52 per cent in 2005, reaching Dh111.4 growth in all billion compared to Dh73.3 billion in 2004. sectors. The country’s impressive economic performance during the year led to a GDP growth rate of 25.6 per cent at current prices, while real GDP growth is estimated at 8.2 per cent. Key factors were the strong oil market, active development of public joint stock companies, increased involvement of free zones and buoyant local stock markets, together with launches of a number of significant new projects. Astute economic policies provided solid foundations for impressive growth in all sectors with GDP at current prices reaching Dh485.5 billion in 2005 compared to Dh386.5 billion in 2004 (based on Ministry of Economy figures and Central Bank Annual Report).
    [Show full text]
  • MIDRMA Board/12-WP/3 4/12/2012 International Civil Aviation
    MIDRMA Board/12-WP/3 4/12/2012 International Civil Aviation Organization Middle East Regional Monitoring Agency Board Twelfth Meeting (MIDRMA Board/12) (Kuwait, 17 – 19 December 2012) Agenda Item 3: Progress Report on the MID RMA Project MIDRMA PROJECT (RAB/05/802) FINANCIAL REPORT (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY This paper presents the status of financial contributions by the MIDRMA Member States to the MIDRMA project and the statement of expenditures of the project (RAB/05/802) as well as the MIDRMA accounting activities for year 2011 and year 2012 as of 30 November 2012 for review and approval. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES - MIDANPIRG/13 Report - MIDRMA Board/11 Report 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In accordance with the MIDRMA Funding Mechanism, as approved by MIDANPIRG/12 through Conclusion 12/12, the MIDRMA Member States should pay their contributions on a yearly basis not later than 1 November of each year based on the invoices issued by ICAO. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The status of MIDRMA States’ contributions to the MIDRMA Project (RAB/05/802), as of 30 September 2012 is as follows: MIDRMA Board/12-WP/3 -2- 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Bahrain Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$ 29,978 on (US$ 30,000 30,000) 20,000) 30,000) 30,000) 30,000) 27Oct11) on 29Aug12) Egypt Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$ 29,960 on (US$ 29,960 30,000) 20,000) 30,000) 30,000) 30,000) 9Sep10) on 17Jan12) Iran Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Not Paid Not Paid (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$ (US$
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Airways (24% – Subject to Regulatory Ap- WY Muscat Madinah 10 Jul
    Issue 77 - Aug. 2013 Official Monthly Bulletin of AACO Arab world marks an increase of AVIATION WITHIN THE ARAB WORLD GLOBAL ARAB AVIATION 13.6% in June 2013 in international passenger numbers - p. 7 GROWTH p: 10 SPREADING OUT p: 24 PARTNER AIRLINES p: 48 - 59 An extra 12 million international ARAB AIRLINES ECONOMICS p: 11 TOURISM p: 32 INDUSTRY PARTNERS p: 60 - 79 tourists in the first four months of EXPANSION p: 13 AACO & RTC CALENDARS p: 80 - 83 2013 - p. 32 COLLABORATION p: 35 LAURELS p: 17 ENVIRONMENT p: 36 AACO MEMBERS & PARTNERS p: 84 - 87 Middle East airports target carbon TECHNOLOGY & E-COMMERCE p: 17 REGULATORY TONE p: 38 neutrality with environmental and emissions reduction initiatives - p. 36 TRAINING p: 18 AN AVIATION MARKET IN FOCUS: UAE p: 42 ARAB AIRPORTS p: 19 WORLD NEWS p: 44 Daily news on www.aaco.org Issue 77 - Aug. 2013 New open-skies deals are pav- The EU has as well entered open skies bilaterals with Brazil and Can- ing the way for strengthening ada as global strategic partners, in addition to neighborhood coun- trade, investment and partner- tries such as Western Balkan partners and Morocco in 2006, Georgia ships, among other benefits. In and Jordan in 2010, and Maldova in 2012. In December the EU an- July, the UAE, Qatar and Kuwait nounced plans to open negotiations with Turkey and India, and set a Whether sealed open skies accords with 2015 target for comprehensive open skies agreements with all neigh- New Zealand. The UAE inked an boring countries. An accord with Ukraine is expected by this year’s Bilateral or open skies deal with Finland, while end.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle Ground
    SPECIAL REPORT: LOW COST CARRIERS The middle ground As the region’s low-cost carriers continue to grow in popularity, another business model is emerging to fill the niche between full-service and budget airlines. By Nadia Khan ncouraged by the fast-paced Middle East aviation by introducing the location of the UAE is very different to growth of low-cost carriers LCC model and taking it to new heights,” that of Europe or the US in that fl ying (LCCs) in markets such as says Ali. “Our success over the past eight is the only feasible option when visiting Europe and Northern America, years has helped the LCC sector achieve other countries,” says Al Ghaith. “When EAir Arabia became the Middle East’s fi rst signifi cant market share in the region.” Air these two factors are combined with the budget airline in 2003, followed by the Arabia operates a typical no frills low-cost minimal penetration of low-cost carriers in likes of Kuwait’s Jazeera Airways, Saudi model, relying on a single type of aircraft the Middle East, budget airlines are well- Arabia’s Nasair and Sama Airlines, Bahrain to reduce extra maintenances costs. By the placed to prosper in the years to come.” Air and fl ydubai. Trying to fi nd their place end of the third quarter in 2011, the carrier Whilst the future does indeed look prom- in a highly competitive environment, these was demonstrating sustainable profi tability ising for the LCC carriers, a new airline airlines have battled with regional unrest, and healthy seat occupancy levels.
    [Show full text]
  • ICAO SAR Forum Hosted by UAE GCAA in Abu Dhabi - 21 to 22 June 2010
    Final List of Attendees - ICAO SAR Forum hosted by UAE GCAA in Abu Dhabi - 21 to 22 June 2010 Last name First name Position Company/Organization Country Representative of Argentina on the Council Singh Alberto ICAO Argentina of ICAO Barton Mike RCC Chief, AusSAR AusSAR Australia Young John General Manager AusSAR Australia Representative of Australia on the Council of Evans Peter ICAO Australia ICAO Kingdom of Bahrain-Civil Mohamed Hassa Saleem Chief Air Traffic Management Bahrain Aviation Affairs Al Thawadi A.M. Captain NA Bahrain Al Walid al Faisal C. Air traffic controller NA Bahrain Zoubi K.J. Lieutenant NA Bahrain Assistant Aerodrome Office and Domestic Assistant Aerodrome Officer Ekhlas Uddin Bangladesh Airport Manager and Domestic Airport Manager Min. of Civil Aviation and Akhter A.K.M. Shamim Senior Assistant Secretary Bangladesh Tourism Alternate Representative of Brazil on the Alves Jorge Luis Franca ICAO Brazil Council of ICAO Franca Alves Jorge Luiz Air Navigation Commissioner ICAO Brazil Cameroon Civil Aviationi Kouogueu Jean Pierre Representative Cameroon Authority Representative of Cameroon on the Council Etundi E.Z. ICAO Cameroon of ICAO Allam M.M. Nader Account Manager EMS Global Tracking Canada Koutrouki Dino Gen. Manager EMS Global Tracking Canada L'Ecuyer Richard D. Senior Global Sales Dir. EMS Global Tracking Canada Government of Canada - Manager, Knowledge Management and Donald Michael National Reserch & Rescue Canada Emerging Technology Secretariat Dalton Chris Chief, Air Traffic Management Section ICAO Canada McGill Institute of Air & Space Milde Michael Emeritus Dir. Canada Law Perez Jose M. Huepe Director General DGCA Chile Delegation of China, Representative on the Ma Toa ICAO China Council of ICAO Abonouan Jean K.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmentation of Airline Market in the GCC Region: Profiling Business Customers Using Low Cost and Full Service Carriers
    British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade 4(10): 1610-1623, 2014 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org Segmentation of Airline Market in the GCC Region: Profiling Business Customers Using Low Cost and Full Service Carriers Shohab Sikandar Desai 1* , C. M. Siddique 1 and Zahi Yaseen 2 1College of Business Administration, American University in the Emirates, Dubai International Academic City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. 2Faculty of Business Management, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript . Received 12 th April 2014 th Original Research Article Accepted 28 May 2014 Published 13 th June 2014 ABSTRACT Aims: This paper was designed to identify the differences and similarities between business travelers using low-cost carriers (LCCs) and full-service carriers (FSCs) in the GCC region. Research on the characteristics of business travelers, who are seen as an important market segment for both low-cost and full-service airlines, is sparse and anecdotal at best. This paper represents an initial effort at developing profiles of business travelers using LCCs and FSCs. Study Design : Research paper based on survey data. Methodology: The study employed a survey research design and collected data on business travelers using LCCs and FSCs by means of a brief questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS software package. A combination of nonparametric tests such as Chi Square and T-Test for two independent samples was employed to assess the extent of differences and similarities between the LCC and FSC customer samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Lt-Gen Kyaw Win Supervises Development Tasks in Momeik, Mabein Momeik, Granary of Shan State (North), to Extend Cultivation of Crops
    Established 1914 Volume XV, Number 132 13th Waxing of Wagaung 1369 ME Sunday, 26 August, 2007 Four political objectives Four economic objectives Four social objectives * Development of agriculture as the base and all-round * Stability of the State, community peace * Uplift of the morale and morality of development of other sectors of the economy as well and tranquillity, prevalence of law and the entire nation * Proper evolution of the market-oriented economic order * Uplift of national prestige and integ- system * National reconsolidation rity and preservation and safeguard- * Development of the economy inviting participation in * Emergence of a new enduring State ing of cultural heritage and national terms of technical know-how and investments from Constitution character sources inside the country and abroad * Building of a new modern developed * Uplift of dynamism of patriotic spirit * The initiative to shape the national economy must be kept * Uplift of health, fitness and education nation in accord with the new State in the hands of the State and the national peoples Constitution standards of the entire nation Lt-Gen Kyaw Win supervises development tasks in Momeik, Mabein Momeik, granary of Shan State (North), to extend cultivation of crops NAY PYI TAW, 25 Aug — Member of the State Peace and Develop- ment Council Lt-Gen Kyaw Win of the Minis- try of Defence, accompa- nied by Chairman of Shan State (North) PDC Commander of North- East Command Maj-Gen Aung Than Htut and of- ficials, inspected progress of the hydropower project at 6th-mile Wa- terfalls in Momeik on 23 August. On completion, the hydropower project Lt-Gen Kyaw Win views thriving Rubber Farm in Mabein Township.
    [Show full text]