Why the ergative case in modal (in)transitive clauses? The historical evolution of Aspect, modality, ergative and locative in Indo-Aryan Annie Montaut To cite this version: Annie Montaut. Why the ergative case in modal (in)transitive clauses? The historical evolution of Aspect, modality, ergative and locative in Indo-Aryan. Dahl, Eystein & Stronski, Krysztof. Indo- Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective, Benjamins, pp.135-167, 2016, Typological Studies in Language, 9789027267160. hal-01313090 HAL Id: hal-01313090 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01313090 Submitted on 9 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Why the ergative case in modal (in)transitive clauses? The historical evolution of Aspect, modality, ergative and locative in Indo - Aryan Annie MONTAUT Inalco, Paris, UMR 8202 (CNRS/INALCO/IRD). Prog r am ‘In vestissements d’avenir ’ of the Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR - 10 - LABX 0083 (Labex EFL)
[email protected] In Ergativity in Indo - Aryan . Ey stein DAHL & K ry sz tof Stronski (eds). Benjamins Abstract Hindi transitive verbs, contrary to Bengali verbs, require the ergative structure in the perfective aspect, an atypical featur e for an Indo - European language, and considered to display only surface ergativity, since most syntactic and discursive properties are attached to the agent.