T the Isla and D Ispute E Betw Ween C China & Jap

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

T the Isla and D Ispute E Betw Ween C China & Jap The Island dispute between China & Japan ‐ Saturday, 10 November 2012, 13:00 ‐ 17:00; ‐ Saturday, 24 November 2012, 13:00 ‐ 17:00. Address: Imperial Palace Vienna ("Hofburg/Stallburg")A‐1010 VIENNA, Reitschulgasse 2/2nd floor(corner Josefsplatz ‐ Bruner Str.). V i enna M odel U n ited N a tions C lub The Island dispute between China & Japan Brief summary of the dispute The Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu Islands in mainland China; andTiaoyutai Islands in Taiwan) are a groupof uninhabited islands controlled by Japan in the East China Sea. After it was discovered in 1968 that oil reserves might be found under the sea near the islands, Japan's sovereignty over them has been disputed by the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC, commonly known as Taiwan) following the transfer of administration from the United States to Japan in 1971. The Chinese claim the discovery and control of the islands from the 14th century. Japan controlled the islands from 1895 until its surrender at the end of World War II. The United States administered them as part of the United States Civil Administration of the Ryukyu Islands from 1945 until 1972, when the islands reverted to Japanese control under the Okinawa Reversion Treaty between the United States and Japan. The People's Republic and Taiwan claim that the islands have been a part of Chinese territory since at least 1534. They acknowledge that Japan took control of the islands in 1894–1895 during the first Sino-Japanese War, through the signature of the Treaty of Shimonoseki. They assert that thePotsdam Declaration (which Japan accepted as part of the San Francisco Peace Treaty) required that Japan relinquish control of all islands except for "the islands of Honshū, Hokkaidō, Kyūshū, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine", and they state that this means control of the islands should pass to China.. Japan has rejected claims that the islands were under China's control prior to 1895, and that these islands were contemplated by the Potsdam Declaration or affected by the San Francisco Peace Treaty. Despite the complexity of relations between the PRC and ROC, both governments agree that the islands are part of Taiwan as part of Toucheng Township in Yilan County of their respective divisions. Japan does not officially recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, and regards the islands as a part of Ishigaki, Okinawa Prefecture and acknowledges neither the claims of the PRC nor ROC to the islands. Japan does not accept that there is a dispute, asserting that the islands are an integral part of Japan The Japanese government has not allowed Ishigaki to develop the islands. 2 | Page Escalation of the Conflict The dispute of the islands has already resulted in military enforcement on both sides. Japan had numerous military drills with the United States and other of its allies in the last years. As a response of the islands disputes, Japan and the US conducted military training for island defense in the American island of Guam. In a move that signals how the two allies are adjusting their defense cooperation to counter Beijing's growing territorial ambitions in the Western Pacific, troops from Japan's Ground Self Defense Force since mid-August have been receiving training on amphibious military tactics from the U.S. Marine Corps. In response China held naval exercises in the East China Sea today and presented their military force, to warn regional rivals against escalating territorial disputes. China regularly holds maritime drills in the fall, but sources close to the military said the drills were related to the islands territorial dispute. The situation got worse whenChina's Ministry of Defense announced in late September that China has sent its first aircraft carrier into formal service said the newly named Liaoning aircraft carrier would raise the overall operational strength of the Chinese navy and help Beijing to effectively protect national sovereignty, security and development interests. In fact, the aircraft carrier, refitted from a ship bought from the Ukraine, will play a minor role, mostly for training and testing ahead of the possible launch of China's first domestically built carriers after 2015, analysts say. The Pentagon played down the event, with spokesman George Little telling a briefing that the United States was monitoring China's development of its military but noted: "This wasn't a particular surprise." The US responded in by extending the service of the U.S. Naval Forces, U.S. 7th Fleetand other operating forces, in Yokosuka, Japan, which are assigned in the Western Pacific due to its enormous strategic importance. 3 | Page EARLY period •firstrecords:15thcentury, Voyage with a Tail Wind (1403) •first published description of the islands in Europe: a book imported bby Isaac Titsingh in 1796 •The collective use of the name "Senkaku" began with the advent of thecontroversyinthe 1970s Japanese and USA control •The Japanese central government formally annexed the islands on 14 January 1895 •Around 1900, Koga Tatsushirō bonito processing plant, failed in 1940 •1970s Koga Tatsushirō`s son sold the four islets to the Kurihara family •1945 USA occupationafterthesurrender of Japan ended WWII •1969ECAFEidentifiedpotentialoiland gas reserves •1971 the Okinawa Reversion Treaty passed the U.S. Senate, returning the islands to Japanese control •1972 the Taiwanese and Chinese governments officially began to declare ownership of the islands •1979 an official delegation from the Japanese government surveyed the local ecosystem and examined whether the islands would support human habitation MODERN period •2002 ‐ 2012, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan paid the Kurihara family ¥25 million a year to rent Uotsuri •17 /12/ 2010, Ishigaki declared January 14 as "Pioneering Day" to commemorate Japan's 1895 annexation of the Senkaku Islands. China condemned Ishigaki's actions. •2012, both the Tokyo Metropolitan and Japanese central governments announced plans to negotiate purchase of Uotsuri, Kita‐Kojima, and Minami‐Kojima from the Kurihara family. •11 / 09 / 2012, the Japanese government nationalized its control over Minamikojima, Kitakojima, and Uotsuri islands by purchasing them from the Kurihara family for ¥2.05 billion. China's Foreign Ministry objected saying Beijing would not "sit back and watch its territorial sovereignty violated." On 8 August, after a meeting between the Japanese Defense Minister and the American Defense Secretary, it was announced that UAVs would be used to conduct surveillance around Okinawa, which will include the Senkaku Islands. •15 / 08/ 2012 ships carrying activists from Hong Kong approached the islands, but were stopped by the Japan Coast Guard. •18 / 08/ 2012 150 Japanese activists arrived at the islands to commemorate Japanese World War II deaths in the area. When the activists were denied permission to land, severaal of them swam to the islands and made an unauthorized landing on Uotsuri, where they raised Japanese flags. 4 | Pag e UN Involvement and Previous UN‐Actions The dispute between China and Japan surrounding the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands is unprecedented for the Security Council, however in light of recent events there is an imminent danger that the situation might escalate to a degree that threatens the stability of the entire region. It is necessary to note that, China’s powers in the Security Council regarding this dispute are somewhat limited, due to the provisions of Article 27 of the UN Charter. As such, decisions of the Security Council on substantial matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting Today, it is the potential for energy resources that fuels Japan-China disagreement over the waters of the East China Sea. Ever since the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) survey of the East China and Yellow Seas in the late 1960s suggested that a vast deposit of hydrocarbon resources were to be found on or near the continental shelf that stretches off the Chinese coast in Asia, the waters shared by China, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan have become the focus of dispute. Moreover, the UNCLOS creation of exclusive economic zones renders the interactions of these Northeast Asia powers more contentious as the definition of where territorial waters end and the 200 nautical mile EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone, i.e. a sea zone prescribed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea over which a state has special rights over the exploration and use of marine resources, including energy production from water and wind) areas begin depends on who owns the islands that populate the East China Sea. Thus, the status of the Senkaku islands reflects more than a historical dispute over ownership. The territorial dispute, which burgeoning in the 1970s, as the U.S. occupation of the Ryukyu Islands of Japan ended and as Chinese relations with both the United States and Japan improved, also reflected the intensification of claims over the potential seabed resources that resided under the East China Sea. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) introduced a new dimension to the territorial claims in the East China Sea. Discussion over how to define the proper demarcation of maritime boundaries 5 | Page raised arguments for basing claims based on the geological characteristics of the seabed below, and all countries of East Asia had a stake in this discussion. Japan’s claims were based on a negotiated median line between the territorial waters of China and Japan. UNCLOS allows for China and Japan’s respective EEZs to extend for 200 nautical miles, but the width of the East China Sea is only 360 nautical miles, necessitating a median line (UNCLOS, Part II, Article 15).
Recommended publications
  • Filatelicfiesta.Org Program WPL Auction Bonin Islands Mail Call
    Whole number 181 May 2013 WPL Auction Program he Sequoia Stamp Club will host d Laveroni will speak at the May T the Western Philatelic Library’s E 1st meeting on the South Pacific auction in an effort to help raise funds for Coast Railroad, its philatelic importance the library’s move scheduled for this and its economic importance to the 9 - 11 ̴ WE WILL NEVER FORGET summer. The library must vacate the Santa Clara Valley. 2013 Club Officers Raynor facility by June 30th, 2013. We Ed is a seasoned exhibitor who researches President understand a building is being purchased his subjects extensively and can convey up the peninsula but have no details. the story with élan. Brian Jones. 408.927.6861 [email protected] The auction will take place May 14 at Munchies and coffee will be available, Vice President the Community Activities Building, so mark your calendar and look forward David Occhipinti . 408.723.0122 1400 Roosevelt Avenue, Redwood City. to a fun event. Doors open at 7:05 pm. Some 50 to 60 Secretary lots are expected and there are normally Bonin Islands David Gilman . .408.264.1953 [email protected] many good values that can be had at WPL n page four is a short history of the Treasurer auctions and this auction should prove to Bonin Islands found on the internet. be more of the same. O Richard Clever . 408.238.0893 The main island in this group is Chichi-jima [email protected] which, in WWII, was the scene of a Mail Call Newsletter Editor number of horrors, including cannibalism James Sauer .
    [Show full text]
  • 'Catastrophe of This New Chinese Mission': the Amherst Embassy To
    1 The ‘catastrophe of this new Chinese mission’: the Amherst Embassy to China of 1816. PETER J. KITSON Amherst’s Embassy and Early Nineteenth-Century Sino-British Relations Two hundred years ago in the early hours of the morning 29 August 1816 (Jiaqing 21), William Pitt, Lord Amherst, unrested after travelling overnight, was unceremoniously manhandled in an attempt to usher him physically with his two deputies, George Thomas Staunton and Henry Ellis, into the presence of the Jiaqing Emperor at the Summer Palace of Yuanming Yuan. Exhausted, dirty after a very uncomfortable overnight journey and separated from his diplomatic credentials and ambassadorial robes, Amherst and his two deputies resisted, leaving the palace in anger. It was reported to the emperor that Amherst’s inability to attend the audience was occasioned by an indisposition, as was that of his deputies. The emperor, when discovering the diplomatic nature of this evasion, immediately and perhaps impulsively, dismissed the embassy without granting it an imperial audience and rejected its ‘tribute’ of gifts. Amherst’s party then began their long, overland journey south to Canton (Guangzhou) where the group embarked for home. British accounts, of which they were several, laid this ostensible ‘failure’ of the embassy to secure an imperial audience not on the Jiaqing Emperor, but on the scheming of certain senior court officials who had unwisely assured him that Amherst had practiced and was prepared to perform the ceremony of the full imperial koutou (or ketou both Mandarin) or ‘kowtow’ (anglicised) with three kneelings accompanied by three knockings of the forehead for each prostration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Durability of the Bakuhan Taisei Is Stunning
    Tokugawa Yoshimune versus Tokugawa Muneharu: Rival Visions of Benevolent Rule by Tim Ervin Cooper III A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Mary Elizabeth Berry, Chair Professor Irwin Scheiner Professor Susan Matisoff Fall 2010 Abstract Tokugawa Yoshimune versus Tokugawa Muneharu: Rival Visions of Benevolent Rule by Tim Ervin Cooper III Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Mary Elizabeth Berry, Chair This dissertation examines the political rivalry between the eighth Tokugawa shogun, Yoshimune (1684‐1751, r. 1716‐45), and his cousin, the daimyo lord of Owari domain, Tokugawa Muneharu (1696‐1764, r. 1730‐39). For nearly a decade, Muneharu ruled Owari domain in a manner that directly contravened the policies and edicts of his cousin, the shogun. Muneharu ignored admonishments of his behavior, and he openly criticized the shogun’s Kyōhō era (1716‐36) reforms for the hardship that they brought people throughout Japan. Muneharu’s flamboyance and visibility transgressed traditional status boundaries between rulers and their subjects, and his lenient economic and social policies allowed commoners to enjoy the pleasures and profits of Nagoya entertainment districts that were expanding in response to the Owari lord’s personal fondness for the floating world. Ultimately, Muneharu’s fiscal extravagance and moral lenience—benevolent rule (jinsei), as he defined it—bankrupted domain coffers and led to his removal from office by Yoshimune. Although Muneharu’s challenge to Yoshimune’s political authority ended in failure, it nevertheless reveals the important role that competing notions of benevolence (jin) were coming to play in the rhetoric of Tokugawa rulership.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Decorating: Dutch Salons in Early Modern Japan
    SOCIAL DECORATING: DUTCH SALONS IN EARLY MODERN JAPAN TERRENCE JACKSON Adrian College Seated Intellect, Performative Intellect Cultural salons proliferated during the last half of the eighteenth century in Japan, accommodating a growing interest in the za arts and literature (za-bungei 座文芸). The literal meaning of za 座 was “seat,” and the za arts (visual and literary) were performed within groups, which were presumably “seated” together. Za culture first appeared as early as the thirteenth century when the Emperor Go-Toba 後鳥羽 held poetry gatherings in his salon (zashiki 座敷). In practice, za also referred to the physical space where these individuals gathered, and it is from that that the related term zashiki, or “sitting room” was derived.1 Zashiki served a function similar to the salons of Europe in the early modern period—as a semi-private space to entertain guests and enjoy cultural interaction. Za arts gatherings met within the homes of participants or patrons, but also in rented zashiki at temples and teahouses. During their meetings, professionals and amateurs interacted and cooperated to produce culture. The epitome of this was renga 連歌 poetry in which groups created linked-verses. However, other types of cultural groups met in salons to design such items as woodblock prints and playful calendars, to debate flower arranging, or to discuss the latest bestsellers. Within these spaces, the emphasis was on group production and on the rights of all attendees to participate, regardless of social background. The atmosphere of zashiki gatherings combined civility, curiosity, playfulness, and camaraderie. The distinction between artistic and intellectual pursuits had fuzzy boundaries during the Tokugawa period, and scholars largely operated within a social world similar to artists, poets, and fiction writers .
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Materials on Korean from the Siebold Archive in Bochum – Preceded by Some General Remarks Regarding Siebold’S Study of Korean
    Selected materials on Korean from the Siebold Archive in Bochum – Preceded by Some General Remarks Regarding Siebold’s Study of Korean Sven Osterkamp The present paper introduces several manuscripts related to the Korean language and script from the Siebold Archive at Ruhr University Bochum which have hitherto gone largely un- noticed. After describing the exact nature and content of these materials, their Japanese sources are identified and their role in Siebold’s opus magnum Nippon is discussed. This is pre- ceded by a number of general remarks concerning Siebold’s study of Korean as well as previous scholarship in this field. While Philipp Franz von Siebold (1796–1866) has an important place both in the history of Japanese–Western relations in general and the (pre-)history of Japanology in particular, it is not possible to do justice to the man and his work if only his con- tribution to Japanese studies is considered.* Besides the Ainu and the former kingdom of Ryūkyū, for instance, Siebold’s interest and scholarship extended to Korea – in fact to such an astonishing degree that it is hard to believe that his work is still often seen in the context of Japan alone. This is not to say, however, that Siebold’s achievements regarding the Korean lan- guage and script went entirely unnoticed – important studies by William E. Griffis (1882), Ogura Shinpei (1927, 1929, 1940), Shinmura Izuru (1929, 1938), Hamada Atsushi (1977), Ko Yŏnggŭn (1978, 1981, 1989), Frits Vos (1983), Yi Kimun (2000), and Ken Vos (2003) all prove the opposite. Nevertheless a number of unsatisfactory aspects remain in the treatment of the relevant writings by both Siebold and Johann Joseph Hoffmann (1805–1878), who was responsible for a considerable part of the study and publication of the materials collected by Siebold after the latter’s return to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Displaying Authority: Guns, Political Legitimacy, and Martial Pageantry in Tokugawa Japan, 1600-1868
    DISPLAYING AUTHORITY: GUNS, POLITICAL LEGITIMACY, AND MARTIAL PAGEANTRY IN TOKUGAWA JAPAN, 1600-1868. Daniele Lauro A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History Chapel Hill 2012 Approved by: Dr. Morgan Pitelka Dr. William M. Fletcher Dr. Wayne Lee © 2012 Daniele Lauro ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT DANIELE LAURO: Displaying authority: guns, political legitimacy, and martial pageantry in Tokugawa Japan, 1600-1868. (Under the direction of Morgan Pitelka) From the end of the sixteenth century on, firearms in Japan are increasingly found in contexts other than the battlefield. A perusal of the Records of the Tokugawa Family (Tokugawa Jikki) - the military clan that ruled Japan from 1603 to 1868 - reveals, for instance, that guns were often involved in ritual practices performed by the warrior elite, such as weddings, funerals, hunting parades, and celebrations of the New Year. Moreover, it was common for both the shogun and the domainal lords (daimyô) to display firearms and other weapons during public audiences and military parades. By considering different ritual practices that involved the display of military power such as daimyo processions to Edo, shogunal pilgrimages to Nikko, military reviews, large-scale hunts and other pageants, this paper argues that during the Tokugawa period guns were often used by the warrior elite as tools to shore up authority, legitimize the political order, and reinforce ideals of warrior identity. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter I. Local authority on the move: daimyo processions (daimyô gyôretsu) and the system of alternate attendance (sankin kôtai)……………………………….11 II.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Introduction to the History of Dutch Studies in Japan
    NAOSITE: Nagasaki University's Academic Output SITE Title A Short Introduction to the History of Dutch Studies in Japan Author(s) Yamashita, Noboru Citation 長崎大学言語教育研究センター紀要, 3, pp.57-77; 2015 Issue Date 2015-03-01 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10069/35762 Right This document is downloaded at: 2017-12-22T09:28:34Z http://naosite.lb.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 長崎大学言語教育研究センター紀要第 3 号 2015 年 3 月 A Short Introduction to the History of Dutch Studies in Japan Noboru YAMASHITA Center for Language Studies, Nagasaki University 蘭学の歴史と発展の概要 山下 龍 長崎大学言語教育研究センター アブストラクト 1600 年にオランダのリーフデ号が日本の臼杵の海岸に着き、この出来 事は、現在まで続いている、414 年の日蘭交流の始まりである。出島 のオランダ商館は、江戸初期の鎖国令から幕末の開国まで、日本の唯 一の欧州への扉であった。欧州についての情報、医学などの科学的知 識などは、すべてオランダを通して日本に紹介され、「蘭学」と呼ばれ るようになった。この論文は、蘭学の歴史的発展と幕末の没落に関し て論ずる。 Abstract In 1600, a Dutch vessel named ‘Liefde’ arrived at the shores of Usuki, Japan. This event marks the start of the relationships between Japan and the Netherlands. The relations between the countries continued when Japan started its policy of isolation, and have lasted for 414 years until the present day. For over 200 years, the Dutch at the island of Dejima in Nagasaki, were the only gateway to the West. All knowledge from and about Europe was introduced to the country via the Dutch and hence became known as ‘Dutch Studies’ or ‘Rangaku’. This article will discuss the development of Rangaku and its ultimate abandonment at the beginning of the 19th century when the country was forcibly opened to the outside world. -57 - 長崎大学言語教育研究センター紀要第 3 号 Keywords: Dutch Studies, Rangaku, Rangakusha, Dutch-Japanese relations 1. Introduction In the year 1600, a Dutch vessel named ‘Liefde’1 arrived at Usuki, in present Oita prefecture, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Western Knowledge About the Korean Language and Script— from the Beginnings to Pallas (1786/87–89)
    A Brief History of Western Knowledge about the Korean Language and Script— from the Beginnings to Pallas (1786/87–89) Sven Osterkamp The aim of the present article is to outline Western knowledge and studies pertaining to the Korean language and script from its vague beginnings in the late 16th century to the monumental linguistic works of the 1780s. The latter date will appear somewhat arbitrary, and it certainly is to some extent. It can, if at all, only be justified by the circumstances out of which this study developed. Originally intended to be little more than a prolegomenon to the investigation of Philipp Franz von Siebold’s (1796–1866) contribution to the study of Korean in the West,1 with the modest aim of situating his work in an appropriate manner, it soon became apparent that the subject matter at hand presented a field of study in its own right—and one undoubtedly still in need of plowing. As work on the topic progressed, the list of sources to be covered and problems to be solved grew ever longer, resulting in a split of the period into the one treated herein, and another one from the last decade of the 18th century to the 1830s. The latter period will be treated separately on another occasion and is therefore merely outlined in rough strokes towards the end of this contribution. Among the prior studies in this field, the pioneering efforts by Ogura Shinpei 小倉 進平 (1882–1944) in the 1920s are the first that have to be mentioned.2 Despite the 1 For some preliminary results see the present author’s »Selected Materials on Korean from the Siebold Archive in Bochum—Preceded by Some General Remarks Regarding Siebold’s Study of Korean«, Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung 33 (2009), 187–216.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dūfu Haruma: an Explosive Dictionary
    THE Dūfu HARUMA: AN EXPLOSIVE DICTIONARY Rudolf Effert Dictionaries and catalogues: Home of obsessional neurotics. The index as literary genre?1 Compiling dictionaries in Japan Both the Dutch and the Japanese had employed interpreters ever since the VOC (Dutch East India Company) established a factory at Hirado in 1609. After the forced move to Dejima in 1641, the selection and appointment of all interpreters became the responsibility of the office of the Nagasaki magistrate. Although the Portuguese had been expelled from Japan in 1639, the lingua franca remained Portuguese until 1673. For most of the seventeenth century, therefore, the interpreters’ knowledge of the Dutch language remained poor. Sworn to secrecy and, by and large, keeping their knowledge to themselves, they learned phrases without paying any atten- tion to the structural features of the Dutch language. The katakana sylla- bary that was used for transcription was actually quite unsuitable for this purpose, because of the greater variety of syllables in Dutch. Moreover, as the interpreters were mostly samurai they considered the Dutch traders very much inferior to themselves, merchants being the lowest class in the Confucian ideology.2 This attitude was not conducive to fruitful intellec- tual exchange. As a result, the Dutch the Japanese interpreters spoke was stilted and archaic. During the eighteenth century, however, some interpreters did develop impressive language skills through personal talent and contact with Dutch traders3 such as Isaac Titsingh (1745–1812) and Jan Cock Blomhoff (1779–1853), who both served as kapitan or Opperhoofd of the factory at 1 Jean-Marie Blas de Roblès, Where the tigers feel at home, Zulma 2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue De Géographie Historique, 9 | 2016 Le Japon D’Edo « Découvre » La Russie Savoirs Connectés Et Conscience Géograp
    Revue de géographie historique 9 | 2016 Géographie historique du Japon d'Edo et ses héritages Le Japon d’Edo « découvre » la Russie savoirs connectés et conscience géographique (1771-1799) Noémi Godefroy Édition électronique URL : https://journals.openedition.org/geohist/1209 DOI : 10.4000/geohist.1209 ISSN : 2264-2617 Éditeur Association française de la Revue de géographie historique Référence électronique Noémi Godefroy, « Le Japon d’Edo « découvre » la Russie savoirs connectés et conscience géographique (1771-1799) », Revue de géographie historique [En ligne], 9 | 2016, mis en ligne le 21 novembre 2016, consulté le 12 juin 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/geohist/1209 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/geohist.1209 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 12 juin 2021. Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Le Japon d’Edo « découvre » la Russie savoirs connectés et conscience géograp... 1 Le Japon d’Edo « découvre » la Russie savoirs connectés et conscience géographique (1771-1799) Noémi Godefroy NOTE DE L’AUTEUR Les recherches entreprises en vue de ce travail ont été effectuées grâce au soutien du Reischauer Institute of Japanese Studies de l’Université de Harvard, du Centre d’Études Japonaises de l’Institut National des Langues et des Civilisations Orientales, et du Centre de Recherches sur le Japon à l’École de Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales. Introduction-Regnum Japoniae clausum ? 1 En 1712, Engelbert Kaempfer, un médecin westphalien, ancien employé de la factorerie de la Compagnie néerlandaise des Indes orientales (Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie, ci-après VOC) sise sur l’île artificielle de Dejima, au large de Nagasaki, publie en latin un essai d’apologie du « royaume fermé du Japon », regnum Japoniae clausum (Kaempfer, 1729 [1712]).
    [Show full text]
  • Isaac Titsingh's Private Correspondence (1783-1812) As the Reflection of an Enlightened `Voyageur Philosophique'
    国際学士院連合関連事業 日本関係海外史料研究 国際研究集会Ⅱ ティツィングとシーボルト―オランダ語史料から探る人物史研究― 2005年11月25日、 日本学士院と東京大学史料編纂所との共催による 「国際学士院連合関連事業 日 本関係海外史料研究 国際研究集会Ⅱ ティツィングとシーボルト―オランダ語史料から探る人物史 研究―」 が開催された。 その記録として、 前号に引き続き、 同研究集会で講演したフランク・レクイ ン博士 (ティツィング研究所長) の論文を今紀要に収録することができた。 同集会は、 レクイン博士 の他、 ペギー・ブランドン (シーボルトハウス) 館長による 「Siebold Huis, Japanese cultural heritage in a Dutch historical setting (シーボルトハウス、 オランダ史跡を彩る日本文化遺産)」 という講演があり、 それぞれに、 鳥井裕美子大分大学教授 「ティツィング研究の可能性」、 沓沢宣賢東海大学教授 「近年の シーボルト研究の動向について」 と題するコメントが行われた。 開催にあたっては、 久保正彰先生お よび尾藤正英先生をはじめとする日本学士院の諸先生方、 事務局の皆様、 および科学研究費基盤 (A) 「日本前近代史料の国際的利用環境構築の研究」 (研究代表者:石上英一)、 同 「17-18世紀アジア諸地 域の港町における異文化交流の諸相の比較研究」 (研究代表者:羽田正 東洋文化研究所教授) の御協 力をいただいた。 記して感謝の気持ちを表したい。 (横山伊徳記) Isaac Titsingh’s Private Correspondence (1783-1812) as the reflection of an enlightened ‘voyageur philos- ophique’. Frank Lequin I am pleased and honoured to have been invited by the Japan Academy in collaboration with the Shiryô Hensan-jo of Tôkyo Daigaku to enlighten you today at such an illustrious institution on the theme Isaac Titsing’s Private Correspondence (1783-1812) as the reflection of a truly enlightened ‘voyageur philosophique’, on the pretext of a quotation by Friedrich Nietzsche: ‘Es gibt noch eine andere Welt zu entdecken - und mehr als eine! Auf die Schiffe, ihr Philosophen!’ (Nietzsche) ‘Still another world there is to be discovered - and more than one! Aboard ships, you Philosophers!’ I am grateful for the personal invitations of my oldest Japanese friend Professor Nakagawa Hisayasu Professor Emeritus of Kyoto University, eminent Diderotiste, and of the President of the Japan Academy Professor Saburo Nagakura. On behalf of Titsingh himself, I allow myself to be proud of the fact that a team of five colleagues at the Shiryô Hensan-jo directed by Professor Yokoyama Yoshinori have devoted their precious time during several years in translating into Japanese one third of the 300 letters from Titsingh’s Private 東京大学史料編纂所研究紀要 第17号 2007年3月 〈1 〉 Correspondence in chronological order and accompanied by an excellent commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • Wake in Guangzhou: the History of the Earth Guangzhou Biennale, 2008
    Wake in Guangzhou: The History of the Earth Guangzhou Biennale, 2008 A sample of earth is removed from Huagui lu, a street in the Liwan District, the former merchant quarters of Guangzhou. The earth sample is placed in the courtyard of the Guangzhou Contemporary Art Museum so that dormant seeds previously Buried in deep layers can germinate when exposed to sunlight. Guangzhou is a port city, formerly known as Canton, and for different periods throughout Chinese history, it was the only city through which foreigners were allowed to enter China and the Liwan District, the only place in China that foreigners were allowed to live in. While the seeds in the mound of earth taken from the Liwan District germinated and plants grew, research uncovered the possiBiliGes of seed carriers to the Liwan District. Ibn Bauta was a scholar Born in Tangier, Morocco. He liked to travel and went to Damascus where VeneGans who had sugar plantaons in Greece would go to trade. Then he went to Cairo-HeBron-Jerusalem-Bethlehem-Iraq-Iran-Aden- Mogadishu-MomBassa (alternavely seeds could have arrived via the Kenyan ivory trade to Guangzhou), ZanziBar, Kilwa, Oman, Hormuz, Anatolia, Turkey, Sinop, Caffa (where he joined up with the caravan of Obeg, the Khan of the Golden Horde and went to the Volga River), ConstanGnople (where he met Emperor Andronicos III, Afghanistan (Alternavely seeds could have arrived via the BriGsh who sent an expediGon force there to put their candidate on the throne), CamBay, Calicut, Maldives (where he married into the royal family), Sri Lanka, Vietnam and Guangzhou.
    [Show full text]