DOCSLIB.ORG

Differences in the Pronunciation of English in Switzerland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MATURAPAPER Differences in the Pronunciation of English in Switzerland The differences in the pronunciation of English by non-native speakers in different cantons and its possible connection to their native dialect Submitted by: Lukas Tribelhorn, 4bW Supervised by: Michael Bühler 06.12.2013 Kantonsschule Wil Table of Contents Preface 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Aims of this Paper ........................................................................................................................... 1 3. Phonetics and Phonology ................................................................................................................ 2 3.1. The International Phonetic Alphabet .......................................................................................... 2 4. Dialectology ..................................................................................................................................... 3 4.1. What is a language, what is a dialect and what is an accent ...................................................... 3 4.2. Received Pronunciation .............................................................................................................. 4 4.2.1. Vowels ............................................................................................................................ 5 4.2.2. Consonants ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.3. Different dialects of Swiss German ............................................................................................. 6 4.3.1. Basel German ................................................................................................................. 6 4.3.2. Grisons German .............................................................................................................. 7 4.3.3. Zurich German ................................................................................................................ 7 4.4. The International Dialects of English Archive ............................................................................. 9 5. Method .......................................................................................................................................... 10 6. Results ............................................................................................................................................ 12 6.1. Basel .......................................................................................................................................... 12 6.2. Chur ........................................................................................................................................... 15 6.3. Zurich ......................................................................................................................................... 18 7. Discussion of the Results ............................................................................................................... 21 7.1. Different pronunciations appearing in the results .................................................................... 21 7.2. Possible causes for the differences in pronunciation in the recordings from Zurich ............... 30 7.2.1. Substitution of non-existent vowels and consonants .................................................. 30 7.2.2. Missing knowledge or concentration ........................................................................... 31 8. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 33 Bibliography........................................................................................................................................... 34 Appendix – Field Recording Guide ........................................................................................................... I Declaration of Authenticity .................................................................................................................... IV Preface Nearly four years ago, when I had to fill out the registration form for the Kantonsschule, I decided pretty soon that I wanted to be in a bilingual class. I saw this as a big chance and I looked forward to it, as I liked the English language and was excited to have my first lessons totally in English. Approaching the end of my years at the Kantonsschule Wil, I finally had to start thinking about what I want to study later. Not surprisingly I thought about studying English together with a second subject. Yet, this will maybe not be my final choice. In search of a topic for my matura paper, I went through all my interests, passions and hobbies and thought of doing something linguistic as this would also be a big help to distinguish what I want to study later. As I wanted to write a paper with a practical part, I soon thought of the idea to compare the differences in the pronunciation of people from different cantons and to find a connection to their native dialect. During the work on this paper the topic changed slightly, yet it still gave me a very good insight into phonetic work, which will definitely help me chose the subject I want to study later. I want to thank multiple persons for their contribution to this paper. First I want to thank my supervisor Mr. Bühler, who helped me with all my questions, provided me with some very good books as resource for the phonetic work and was a very helpful and supporting supervisor. Then I would especially like to thank Ms. Petra Stadler from the Kantonsschule Kirschgarten in Basel, Ms. Franziska Jaeger from the Bündner Kantonsschule in Chur and Mr. Ralph Kilchenmann from the Kantonsschule Hottingen in Zurich, together with their students who gave me their time and the possibility to record them. Without them I would have no recordings to analyse and compare. I would also like to thank Mr. Paul Meier, the Founder and Director of the International Dialects of English Archive, who helped me with my questions concerning phonetic transcription and who provided a complete phonetic transcription of an RP recording which helped me a lot during the analysis of my recordings. Last but not least I would like to thank Mr. Reto Linder, Ms. Patricia Tribelhorn, Ms. Avril Graham, my mother and my brother, who did a great job as proofreaders, for the time they invested into this paper. Lukas Tribelhorn 1 1. Introduction From daily life we know that every person pronounces a word a little differently. Sometimes we talk about an accent or a dialect in this context. What is the difference and is there one? Especially when speaking foreign languages, people say that we have a strong accent. Could this accent be influenced by the native language or dialect? For this project, several people from different cantons of Switzerland have been given the same text to read, then the recordings have been translated into phonetic language and analysed in order to be compared. The results from the recordings from Zurich have then been compared to their native dialect and a connection between these has been sought. This research will focus on students, who are born and grew up in either the canton of Zurich, Basel or Grisons. These three cantons have been chosen because they promised the best chance to get valuable recordings as they speak three fairly different dialects, with a different pronunciation each, which should provide very good resources for analysing and comparing. 2. Aims of this Paper The aims of this paper are to find and present differences and similarities between the pronunciations of English of students from three different cantons of Switzerland. Furthermore for the recordings from Zurich it is also an aim to investigate if there could possibly be a connection to the native dialect of a person and if more detailed researches about this topic would be worthwhile. Lukas Tribelhorn 2 3. Phonetics and Phonology As this paper is about phonetics, a definition of phonetics as well as of phonology is needed to understand the following topics. Therefore this chapter will present some relevant aspects of phonetics and phonology and the connection between these. Phonetics, as well as phonology, is a very important branch of linguistics. It describes the sounds of human speech, or alternatively in sign language, the corresponding aspects of sign. Specifically, it is articulatory phonetics which deals with how speech sounds are made using the articulatory and vocal tract, auditory phonetics which describes how they are perceived by the listener and acoustic phonetics which deals with the physics involved during the transmission form the speaker to the listener. So phonetics is the same for every language which can be spoken as well as for all sign languages (Davenport und Hannahs 2-3). Phonology, on the other hand, deals with how these speech sounds are systematically organised into abstract systems of sounds for the individual varieties; for example how they can be combined and how they affect each other. It also studies the relationships between the sounds within a language or between different languages and the prosodic features, as for example pitch, loudness, tempo and rhythm (Davenport und Hannahs 2-3); (Wikimedia Foundation par. 1-2). A distinction which will be important for the following chapters is the one between
Recommended publications
  • A Bavarian-Speaking Exception in Alemannic-Speaking Switzerland: the Case of Samnaun 48 Located

    A Bavarian-Speaking Exception in Alemannic-Speaking Switzerland: the Case of Samnaun 48 Located

    47 A Bavarian -speaking 1. Introduction1 data2 is missing, as the study by Gröger is the Exception in Alemannic- only detailed linguistic description of the speaking Switzerland: he municipality of Samnaun, situated German dialect in Samnaun. in the extreme east of Switzerland, In this paper, I present a new research The Case of Samnaun project which seeks to fill this gap. The T stands out from the rest of German- speaking Switzerland: Samnaun is usually project is dedicated to the current linguistic A Project Presentation described as the only place where not an situation in Samnaun. Its working title is Alemannic, but a Bavarian dialect is spoken Bairisch-alemannischer Sprachkontakt. Das Journal Article (cf., e.g., Sonderegger 2003: 2839; Wiesinger Spektrum der sprachlichen Variation in Susanne Oberholzer 1983: 817). This claim is based on a study by Samnaun (‘Bavarian-Alemannic Language Gröger (1924) and has found its way into Contact. The Range of Linguistic Variation in Samnaun has been described as the only Samnaun’). This paper describes Samnaun Bavarian-speaking municipality in Ale- many linguistic descriptions of (German- mannic-speaking Switzerland on the basis speaking) Switzerland. In the literature, this and summarises the available descriptions of of a study done in 1924. Hints in the viewpoint has been almost unchallenged for its language situation as well as the aims, literature about the presence of other over 90 years. Hints about the presence of research questions, and methods of the varieties for everyday communication – an other varieties (an Alemannic dialect as well planned project. intermediate variety on the dialect- In section 2, I sketch the municipality of standard -axis as well as an Alemannic as an intermediate variety on the dialect- dialect – have not resulted in more recent standard-axis) from the second half of the Samnaun.
  • Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society)

    Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society)

    <DOCINFO AUTHOR ""TITLE "Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present"SUBJECT "Impact 18"KEYWORDS ""SIZE HEIGHT "220"WIDTH "150"VOFFSET "4"> Germanic Standardizations Impact: Studies in language and society impact publishes monographs, collective volumes, and text books on topics in sociolinguistics. The scope of the series is broad, with special emphasis on areas such as language planning and language policies; language conflict and language death; language standards and language change; dialectology; diglossia; discourse studies; language and social identity (gender, ethnicity, class, ideology); and history and methods of sociolinguistics. General Editor Associate Editor Annick De Houwer Elizabeth Lanza University of Antwerp University of Oslo Advisory Board Ulrich Ammon William Labov Gerhard Mercator University University of Pennsylvania Jan Blommaert Joseph Lo Bianco Ghent University The Australian National University Paul Drew Peter Nelde University of York Catholic University Brussels Anna Escobar Dennis Preston University of Illinois at Urbana Michigan State University Guus Extra Jeanine Treffers-Daller Tilburg University University of the West of England Margarita Hidalgo Vic Webb San Diego State University University of Pretoria Richard A. Hudson University College London Volume 18 Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert and Wim Vandenbussche Germanic Standardizations Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert Monash University Wim Vandenbussche Vrije Universiteit Brussel/FWO-Vlaanderen John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements 8 of American National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Germanic standardizations : past to present / edited by Ana Deumert, Wim Vandenbussche.
  • Identifying Regional Varieties by Pitch Information: a Comparison of Two Approaches

    Identifying Regional Varieties by Pitch Information: a Comparison of Two Approaches

    Identifying regional varieties by pitch information: A comparison of two approaches Jörg Petersa, Peter Gillesb, Peter Auerb, and Margret Seltingc aUniversity of Nijmegen, The Netherlands bUniversity of Freiburg, Germany cUniversity of Potsdam, Germany E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT moderate success rate of their experiment may be due to the method of converting the speech signal into a pulse train. It is a commonly held belief that languages and dialects can This method may destroy crucial prosodic information like be identified by pitch information alone. In most previous syllable or word boundaries. A similar argument may apply experiments, subjects were presented with pitch informa- to the other studies mentioned, as in all experiments listen- tion as well as with limited information on amplitude and ers were presented with lower-level, i.e. non-linguistic, in- timing but not with higher-level, i.e. linguistic, information formation only. as represented by intonation contours. The question arises An experiment that did include higher-level information as to whether higher-level information may significantly was reported by Romano [6]. Romano tested the hypothesis enhance success rates. To evaluate both approaches, two that some of the prosodic differences between regional experiments were carried out. In the first experiment, varieties of Italian persist in spoken standard Italian. Speak- listeners were presented with isolated pitch information ers from six villages of the Salento (South East of Italy) extracted from recordings of four varieties of German. In were asked to read sentences in standard Italian.
  • Hatt Or Si? Neuter and Feminine Gender Assignment in Reference to Female Persons in Luxembourgish

    Hatt Or Si? Neuter and Feminine Gender Assignment in Reference to Female Persons in Luxembourgish

    Hatt or si? Neuter and feminine gender assignment in reference to female persons in Luxembourgish Abstract: In Luxembourgish, feminine as well as neuter gender can be assigned to female persons. Here, female first names are morphologically treated as neuter and therefore trigger neuter gender on their targets (e.g. definite article, personal pronoun). Last names referring to women, however, are feminine and take feminine targets respectively. While the use of neuter and feminine in prototypical and invariable reference contexts are well-known, morphological conflicts often arise regarding more complex name types (e.g. female first name + last name) leading to different degrees of variation between both genders. Building especially upon previous findings by Döhmer (2016), the present contribution offers a first extensive empirical analysis on the use of neuter and feminine personal pronouns considering different female referents as well as familiarity, the referent’s and the speaker’s as decisive (socio-pragmatical) factors for gender assignment. The results are based on elicited data retrieved from an online survey and audio recordings collected by means of the the Luxembourgish language app Schnëssen and allow a quantification of the phenomenon going beyond previous contributions and descriptions in reference grammars. The apparent-time analysis, carried out in order to identify potential tendencies in language change, suggests a preference for neuter pronominalization for younger speakers of Luxembourgish in variable reference contexts. keywords: gender assignment, variation, pronominalization, neuter, Luxembourgish 1 Introduction While a correlation between gender and sex usually applies to appellatives and anthroponyms, one can use feminine as well as neuter when referring to female persons in Luxembourgish.
  • The Wili Benchmark Dataset for Written Natural Language Identification

    The Wili Benchmark Dataset for Written Natural Language Identification

    1 The WiLI benchmark dataset for written II. WRITTEN LANGUAGE BASICS language identification A language is a system of communication. This could be spoken language, written language or sign language. A spoken language Martin Thoma can have several forms of written language. For example, the E-Mail: [email protected] spoken Chinese language has at least three writing systems: Traditional Chinese characters, Simplified Chinese characters and Pinyin — the official romanization system for Standard Chinese. Abstract—This paper describes the WiLI-2018 benchmark dataset for monolingual written natural language identification. Languages evolve. New words like googling, television and WiLI-2018 is a publicly available,1 free of charge dataset of Internet get added, but written languages are also refactored. short text extracts from Wikipedia. It contains 1000 paragraphs For example, the German orthography reform of 1996 aimed at of 235 languages, totaling in 235 000 paragraphs. WiLI is a classification dataset: Given an unknown paragraph written in making the written language simpler. This means any system one dominant language, it has to be decided which language it which recognizes language and any benchmark needs to be is. adapted over time. Hence WiLI is versioned by year. Languages do not necessarily have only one name. According to Wikipedia, the Sranan language is also known as Sranan Tongo, Sranantongo, Surinaams, Surinamese, Surinamese Creole and I. INTRODUCTION Taki Taki. This makes ISO 369-3 valuable, but not all languages are represented in ISO 369-3. As ISO 369-3 uses combinations The identification of written natural language is a task which of 3 Latin letters and has 547 reserved combinations, it can appears often in web applications.
  • Spatial Boundaries and Transitions in Language and Interaction

    Spatial Boundaries and Transitions in Language and Interaction

    URPP Language and Space www.spur.uzh.ch International Conference SPATIAL BOUNDARIES AND TRANSITIONS IN LANGUAGE AND INTERACTION Perspectives from Linguistics and Geography April 23 – 28, 2017 Monte Verità, Ascona http://www.spur.uzh.ch/boundaries PROGRAM MONDAY, 24. APRIL TUESDAY, 25. APRIL 08:00 Breakfast Breakfast 09:00 Welcome 09:15 1 KEYNOTE TALK: Tom Güldemann 9 KEYNOTE TALK: Setha Low Linguistic macro-areas in Africa: when Language, Discourse and Space: boundaries are areas themselves p. 01 A Conceptual Framework for the Ethnography of Space and Place p. 09 10:15 Break Break 10:45 2 INPUT TALK SESSION 1: Peter Auer 10 INPUT TALK SESSION 2: Alfred Lameli Walking and talking: how speakers jointly Intangible Borders – Linguistic Areas and manoeuver in space p. 02 Socio-Cultural Practices p. 10 11:30 3 Paul Luff, Christian Heath, Menisha Patel 11 Stefanie Siebenhuetter Boundaries in interaction spaces: embodied Conceptual transfer of spatial reference due interaction within a large working to language contact? A semantic approach environment p. 03 to cultural conceptualization in the linguistic area Mainland Southeast Asia p. 11 12:00 Lunch Lunch 14:00 4 Martin de Heaver, Paul Luff, 12 Grossenbacher, Britain, Leemann, Christian Heath Kolly, Blaxter, Wanitsch Crossing Boundaries: interactions through Smartphone app methodologies for regional locations within a moving environment p. 04 dialectology: the English North-South divide in data from the English Dialects App p. 12 14:30 5 Albert Acedo and Marco Painho: 13 Daan Hovens “You should participate” or “I want What is the language of the euregio to participate” – engaging spatial rhine-meuse-north? Euroregional integration boundaries p.
  • How Much Does Geography Influence Language Variation? John Nerbonne (University of Groningen)

    How Much Does Geography Influence Language Variation? John Nerbonne (University of Groningen)

    How much does geography influence language variation? John Nerbonne (University of Groningen) Abstract This paper proceeds from a quantitative perspective and applies measurements of linguistic difference to obtain characterizations of the aggregate relations among varieties in entire language areas. From there it is a small step in quantitative methodology to ask how much geographic distance influences (aggregate) linguistic differences, applying a regression design. The paper goes on to contrast the degree to which a very bare concept of geography, just distance, competes with a more complicated one, involving areas or regions, in explaining the aggregate linguistic differences among language varieties. The data is taken from dialect atlases and various other collections, and the linguistic distance is measured using a variant of Levenshtein distance, which has been demonstrated to be valid with respect to dialect speakers’ judgments of linguistic difference. Pure geographic distance models account for between 14% and 38% of the variation found in the data in straightforward regression designs. The alternative to pure distance models involves dialect areas, which we examine on the basis of the independently established dialect areas in Wrede’s famous map of German dialect areas, adding dialect divisions as categorical independent variables to assess their explanatory value. This increases the explained variation from 32% to 45% in the German dialect dataset, indicating that geography is indeed structured more complexly than simple distances, and also that geography influences linguistic variation deeply. 1. Introduction Two insights about language variation are standard and uncontroversial, first that languages may vary in many ways and second, that nearby language varieties are generally – but not always – more similar than distant ones.
  • The Non-Sexist Language Debate in French and English

    The Non-Sexist Language Debate in French and English

    The Non-sexist Language Debate in French and English COADY, Ann Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/24058/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/24058/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. The non-sexist language debate in French and English Ann Coady A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sheffield Hallam University October 2018 Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................... v Candidate's Statement ............................................................................................................................................................ vi Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Language Rich Europe Project Is Delivered by a Consortium of Over 30 Partners

    Language Rich Europe Project Is Delivered by a Consortium of Over 30 Partners

    Published by The Language Rich Europe project is delivered by a consortium of over 30 partners LANGUAGE RICH EUROPE TRENDS IN POLICIES AND PRACTICES LANGUAGE RICH EUROPE FOR MULTILINGUALISM IN EUROPE EDITORS: Guus Extra and Kutlay Yağmur DET DANSKE KULTURINSTITUT INSTITUTE CULTUREL DANOIS DEENS CULTUREEL INSTITUUT GuusExtra Ya and Kutlay Sponsored by ğ mur www.language-rich.eu With the support of: © British Council 2012 Brand and Design / C001 Published by The British Council creates international opportunities for the people This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. of the UK and other countries and builds trust between them worldwide. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the A registered charity: 209131 (England and Wales) SC037733 (Scotland). information contained therein. LANGUAGE RICH EUROPE TRENDS IN POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR MULTILINGUALISM IN EUROPE EDITORS: Guus Extra and Kutlay Yağmur With the support of: This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Published by Cambridge University Press, on behalf of the British Council. November 2012. © Language Rich Europe, British Council. You can copy, download (www.language-rich.eu) or print content of Language Rich Europe for your own use and you can include excerpts from Language Rich Europe in your own documents, presentation, blogs, website and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgements of the Langauge Rich Europe publication as source and copyright owner British Council are given.
  • Compensatory and Opaque Vowel Lengthening in Harmonic Serialism Francesc Torres-Tamarit

    Compensatory and Opaque Vowel Lengthening in Harmonic Serialism Francesc Torres-Tamarit

    Compensatory and opaque vowel lengthening in Harmonic Serialism Francesc Torres-Tamarit To cite this version: Francesc Torres-Tamarit. Compensatory and opaque vowel lengthening in Harmonic Serialism. Har- monic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 2016. hal-01678366 HAL Id: hal-01678366 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01678366 Submitted on 9 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Compensatory and opaque vowel lengthening in Harmonic Serialism 1 Francesc Torres-Tamarit 1 Introduction and overview* Classic compensatory lengthening (CL) occurs when a mora-bearing coda consonant is deleted and its mora reassociates with a preceding vowel (Ingria 1980, Steriade 1982, Hock 1986, Wetzels 1986, Hayes 1989, Kavitskaya 2002). In other words, the deleted consonant is replaced by a lengthened vowel. This phenomenon is usually referred to as CL via mora preservation. The derivation in (1) illustrates one case of classic CL in Latin. (1) /kasnus/ → [kaːnus] ‘gray’ (Hayes 1989) σ σ σ σ σ σ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ k a s n u s → k a n u s → k a n u s The derivation in (1) proceeds as follows.
  • The Wrong Side of the Tracks Claire Alexander-Joly

    The Wrong Side of the Tracks Claire Alexander-Joly

    bioStories sharing the extraordinary in ordinary lives The Wrong Side of the Tracks Claire Alexander-Joly As far as I knew, the world of my childhood was defined and divided by class, and as far as I was concerned, I did not live on the right side of the tracks. From 1963, when I was born, to 1986 when I left for the United States at the age of twenty-three, I lived in a big rectangular block of concrete in the northeastern suburbs of Paris, right outside the Périphérique, the freeway that contours the city and separates it from the banlieues. The building where I and my family lived sat on a hilltop, and from there overlooked not the beautiful sights for which Paris is known but its far less attractive working-class neighborhoods. Paris and its environs are divided by the Seine. The river runs through the city from the southeast to the southwest curving upward toward the middle. L’Île de la Cité— the site of the Notre Dame Cathedral—is the official center of the capital. South of the Seine lies the so-called “Left Bank” or “Rive Gauche,” historically the place of artists and intellectuals; to the north lies the “Right Bank” or “Rive Droite.” The terms are a bit misleading, suggesting an east/west division rather than a north/south one. When I was growing up, only the Rive Gauche seemed to matter. That’s where the rich lived. In 1971, Yves Saint Laurent launched his famous women’s perfume— Rive Gauche—named after his boutique in Saint-Germain-des-Prés on the south side of the river.
  • The Germanic Languages

    The Germanic Languages

    This page intentionally left blank THE GERMANIC LANGUAGES Germanic – one of the largest subgroups of the Indo-European language family – comprises 37 languages with an estimated 470 million speakers worldwide. This book presents a comparative linguistic survey of the full range of Germanic languages, both ancient and modern, including major world languages such as English and German (West Germanic), the Scandi- navian (North Germanic) languages, and the extinct East Germanic lan- guages. Unlike previous studies, it does not take a chronological or a language-by-language approach, organized instead around linguistic con- structions and subsystems. Considering dialects alongside standard varieties, it provides a detailed account of topics such as case, word formation, sound systems, vowel length, syllable structure, the noun phrase, the verb phrase, the expression of tense and mood, and the syntax of the clause. Authoritative and comprehensive, this much-needed survey will be welcomed by scholars and students of the Germanic languages, as well as linguists across the many branches of the field. WAYNE HARBERT is Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Linguistics, Cornell University. He has published extensively on syntactic topics, with a particular emphasis on historical syntax. His work on Germanic languages covers a wide range of problems in historical Ger- manic syntax and phonology, drawing on data from Gothic, Old English, Old High German, Old Saxon, Old Norse, and Modern German. CAMBRIDGE LANGUAGE SURVEYS General editors P. Austin (SOAS, London) J. Bresnan (Stanford University) B. Comrie (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig) S. Crain (University of Maryland) W. Dressler (University of Vienna) C.