Sri Raghavendra Swami's commentary on the Sukta

P8 !%VIF/9 !+.+ !5Y0+ !;" " There's hardly a Hindu who hasn't heard of Purusha Sukta. There's hardly any who does not recite Purusha Sukta during his daily oblations (sandhyAvandana). !" Let's see in detail the commentary on the Purusha Sukta with the light shown by our Mantralaya mahaprabhugalu, Sri Raghavendra Sripadangalvaru. Purusha Sukta is a great seminal sukta because it ascertains that Being who is responsible for bestowing on us the Parama Purushartha called . But who is this Purusha? Is He another being like us or is He infinitely different from us? For one to understand who this Purusha is, one has to refer other Vedic texts to ascertain. Hence Sri Rayaru quotes a lot of Sruti and verses and finally affirms that Purusha is none other than Lord /Narayana. " !" There are certain slight changes to a few words and a couple of verses are interchanged between the Rg Vedic and Yajur Vedic versions of Purusha Sukta. But the import, content and intent of Purusha Sukta however remains the same irrespective of the changes to the words and swapping of the verses. Let's take verse by verse and understand the context, meaning and import of the Sukta as a whole. " !"" The first verse reads thus: " !" ,2 /$/? Q8H9 ST15 /$I?&A5 /$/?Da " " /" YN2 P0@35 4)B@ <3>K1;a !G2R'2 sahasra sIrshA purushaha sahasrAkshah sahasrapAt ! "sa bhUmim vishvatO vritvA atyatishthat dashAngulam ! !" "The Lord Vishnu residing in everybody (as antaryAmi) possesses thousands of heads, thousands of eyes and thousands of legs. He has pervaded everywhere and is Infinitely Superior even to Goddess who is the presiding deity of earth". " !" So, what is meant by Purusha? Is it just a Man or a Cosmic Man or something else? Some have identified Purusha to a jiva while some have identified Him as a Cosmic Man. But the context and even the superficial meaning of the whole Sukta does no where give even an iota of hint that Purusha of Purusha Sukta is a jiva. As regards the Cosmic Man, it can be or even . In the Veda, Hiranyagarbha is also identified as a Purusha. And as the adhipati for Brahmanda, Brahma is also known as Purusha. Hence it has to be settle first as to what is meant by Purusha first and only then one can proceed. Hence Rayaru first addresses this. He quotes a Sruti verse which says " XU9 SO 065 " which means "the One who resides in jiva's body and jiva's heart". Rayaru also quotes a couple of more Srutis " -.5 -._8 $O5 ST15 " and " ST`8 $\7 CF6+5 ". Now Rayaru quotes the Brahmasutra i.2.26 (vaisvAnarAdhikarana) " ST1P"(M Z7*(L86[ " and says that the author of Brahmasutras, Lord Vedavyasa, too references the Purusha Sukta and establishes the word "Purusha" as denoting the Supreme Lord. So we have Sruti vakyas ascertaining Purusha as the Supreme Lord and we also have the support of Brahmasutra, an aptavAkya, as it has been ascertained by an apta, Lord Himself. " !" Now the apparent meaning of " /$I? Q8H9ST15 /$I?&A5 /$/?Da " would mean that "Purusha has 1000 heads, 1000 eyes and 1000 legs". But in the case of God, everything is Infinite and hence he is <*23 R+ -OX+9 . The Taittirya Upanishad says " /3>2 J*2 <*232 Y?$=" which is an unequivocally assertation that God is Infinite. Naturally, if one aspect of God is Infinite, every other attribute/aspect also be infinite. So, how to reconcile the 1000 hands of Purusha Sukta with the other Srutis which say that He is Infinite. All his attributes are infinite in measure and hence He is Svatantra. Everything and everyone other than Him are limited in nature and there is no other being in the entire cosmos who possessed anything in infinite measure. The next highest in the cosmological gradation ( B.3(> ) is Goddess Lakshmi. She has attributes in highest measure compared to anyone below her in the hierarchy but even She is not equal to Lord Vishnu because Lord Vishnu is Infinitely superior to Goddess Lakshmi too. Unlike other Vedantins who resort to "liberty of imagination" ( &'