DOCSLIB.ORG

News Release

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
News Release NEWS RELEASE Nov 08, 2019 R&I Affirms A-/a-1, Changes Outlook to Positive: Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. Rating and Investment Information, Inc. (R&I) has announced the following: ISSUER: Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. Issuer Rating: A-, Affirmed Rating Outlook: Positive, Changed from Stable Commercial Paper: a-1, Affirmed RATIONALE: Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. (FGL) is a general lease company established by six Fuyo Group companies including former The Fuji Bank, Ltd. (currently Mizuho Bank, Ltd.). FGL's competitive advantage lies in transactions with large companies, and consolidated subsidiary Sharp Finance Corp. has strength in vendor leasing for mid-tier firms/small and midsized companies. In the business process outsourcing (BPO) business launched as new services, the company is accelerating M&A activities. Profit before interest expenses has grown steadily thanks to the contribution of non-asset-based businesses including BPO services, as well as the strategic increase of real estate leasing and aircraft leasing transactions. Meanwhile, cost efficiency has been maintained at a sound level, despite the increase of group companies. Accordingly, FGL's earning capacity is improving. Although risk exposure has risen, the company will be able to keep risk resilience commensurate with the level required for the A rating category, in R&I's view, given anticipated profit accumulation. The risk associated with concentration of credit exposure to large borrowers, which was a pending issue, has been mitigated gradually. In consideration of the above-mentioned factors, R&I has affirmed the rating and changed the Rating Outlook to Positive. R&I will upgrade the rating if FGL can enhance an earnings base while keeping its risk-return balance intact. Mizuho Bank, with whom FGL has a close relationship, made IBJ Leasing Co., Ltd. an equity method affiliate of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MHFG), and IBJ Leasing was renamed Mizuho Leasing Co., Ltd. to make it clear that it became a member of the MHFG Group. Marubeni Corp., another Fuyo Group company who established FGL, will also strengthen collaboration with Mizuho Leasing through joint operation of their lease businesses and other activities. FGL has partnered with Mizuho Bank on the marketing front, but new customer referrals from the bank and collaborative activities will not be the same going forward. Given that businesses without collaboration with Mizuho Bank are expanding, no significant changes will occur immediately, in R&I's view. Even so, R&I will confirm whether or not such move in the MHFG Group becomes a constraint on FGL's expansion of the earnings base. The primary rating methodologies applied to this rating are provided at "R&I's Basic Methodology for Corporate Credit Ratings", "Shared Rating Approach for Financial Institutions, etc." and "Leasing". The methodologies are available at the web site listed below, together with other rating methodologies that are taken into consideration when assigning the rating. https://www.r-i.co.jp/en/rating/about/rating_method.html ■Contact : Sales and Marketing Division, Customer Service Dept. TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7471 E-mail. [email protected] ■Media Contact : Corporate Planning Division (Public Relations) TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7273 Rating and Investment Information, Inc. TERRACE SQUARE, 3-22 Kanda Nishikicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan https://www.r-i.co.jp Credit ratings are R&I's opinions on an issuer's general capacity to fulfill its financial obligations and the certainty of the fulfillment of its individual obligations as promised (creditworthiness) and are not statements of fact. Further, R&I does not state its opinions about any risks other than credit risk, give advice regarding investment decisions or financial matters, or endorse the merits of any investment. R&I does not undertake any independent verification of the accuracy or other aspects of the related information when issuing a credit rating and makes no related representations or warranties. R&I is not liable in any way for any damage arising in relation to credit ratings (including amendment or withdrawal thereof). As a general rule, R&I issues a credit rating for a fee paid by the issuer. For details, please refer to https://www.r-i.co.jp/en/docs/policy/site.html. © Rating and Investment Information, Inc. NEWS RELEASE R&I RATINGS: ISSUER: Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. (Sec. Code: 8424) Issuer Rating RATING: A-, Affirmed RATING OUTLOOK: Positive, Changed from Stable Shelf Registration (Bonds) ISSUE AMOUNT (mn): JPY 200,000 ISSUE PERIOD: From Sep 26, 2018 to Sep 25, 2020 RATING: A-, Affirmed (Preliminary) Unsec. Str. Bonds No.10 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Oct 22, 2015 Oct 22, 2020 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.11 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) May 09, 2016 May 07, 2021 JPY 20,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.12 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Sep 21, 2016 Sep 18, 2020 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.13 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Feb 03, 2017 Feb 03, 2022 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.14 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) May 30, 2017 May 30, 2022 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.15 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Dec 07, 2017 Dec 06, 2024 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed ■Contact : Sales and Marketing Division, Customer Service Dept. TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7471 E-mail. [email protected] ■Media Contact : Corporate Planning Division (Public Relations) TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7273 Rating and Investment Information, Inc. TERRACE SQUARE, 3-22 Kanda Nishikicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan https://www.r-i.co.jp Credit ratings are R&I's opinions on an issuer's general capacity to fulfill its financial obligations and the certainty of the fulfillment of its individual obligations as promised (creditworthiness) and are not statements of fact. Further, R&I does not state its opinions about any risks other than credit risk, give advice regarding investment decisions or financial matters, or endorse the merits of any investment. R&I does not undertake any independent verification of the accuracy or other aspects of the related information when issuing a credit rating and makes no related representations or warranties. R&I is not liable in any way for any damage arising in relation to credit ratings (including amendment or withdrawal thereof). As a general rule, R&I issues a credit rating for a fee paid by the issuer. For details, please refer to https://www.r-i.co.jp/en/docs/policy/site.html. © Rating and Investment Information, Inc. NEWS RELEASE Unsec. Str. Bonds No.16 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Apr 27, 2018 Apr 27, 2023 JPY 15,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.17 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) (Green Bonds) Nov 02, 2018 Nov 02, 2023 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.18 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Nov 02, 2018 Nov 02, 2028 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.19 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Apr 17, 2019 Apr 17, 2024 JPY 20,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.20 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) (Green Bonds) Jul 22, 2019 Jul 22, 2024 JPY 5,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.21 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Jul 22, 2019 Jul 20, 2029 JPY 10,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Unsec. Str. Bonds No.22 Issue Date Maturity Date Issue Amount (mn) Oct 28, 2019 Oct 28, 2022 JPY 20,000 RATING: A-, Affirmed Commercial Paper ISSUE LIMIT (mn): JPY 700,000 SUPPORT: Unsecured RATING: a-1, Affirmed ■Contact : Sales and Marketing Division, Customer Service Dept. TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7471 E-mail. [email protected] ■Media Contact : Corporate Planning Division (Public Relations) TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7273 Rating and Investment Information, Inc. TERRACE SQUARE, 3-22 Kanda Nishikicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan https://www.r-i.co.jp Credit ratings are R&I's opinions on an issuer's general capacity to fulfill its financial obligations and the certainty of the fulfillment of its individual obligations as promised (creditworthiness) and are not statements of fact. Further, R&I does not state its opinions about any risks other than credit risk, give advice regarding investment decisions or financial matters, or endorse the merits of any investment. R&I does not undertake any independent verification of the accuracy or other aspects of the related information when issuing a credit rating and makes no related representations or warranties. R&I is not liable in any way for any damage arising in relation to credit ratings (including amendment or withdrawal thereof). As a general rule, R&I issues a credit rating for a fee paid by the issuer. For details, please refer to https://www.r-i.co.jp/en/docs/policy/site.html. © Rating and Investment Information, Inc. NEWS RELEASE A preliminary rating is assigned when a provisional credit rating is needed for an individual obligation on which final terms have not been determined. A credit rating finally assigned may differ from the preliminary rating depending on, among others, the details of the actual contract of the individual obligation. ■Contact : Sales and Marketing Division, Customer Service Dept. TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7471 E-mail. [email protected] ■Media Contact : Corporate Planning Division (Public Relations) TEL.+81-(0)3-6273-7273 Rating and Investment Information, Inc. TERRACE SQUARE, 3-22 Kanda Nishikicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan https://www.r-i.co.jp Credit ratings are R&I's opinions on an issuer's general capacity to fulfill its financial obligations and the certainty of the fulfillment of its individual obligations as promised (creditworthiness) and are not statements of fact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Business Groups, Networks, and Embeddedness: Innovation and Implementation Alliances in Japanese Electronics, 1985–1998
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Business groups, networks, and embeddedness: innovation and implementation alliances in Japanese electronics, 1985–1998 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3dq9f64q Journal Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(3) Authors Lincoln, James R Guillot, Didier Sargent, Matthew Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Industrial and Corporate Change Advance Access published September 10, 2016 Industrial and Corporate Change, 2016, 1–22 doi: 10.1093/icc/dtw037 Original article Business groups, networks, and embeddedness: innovation and implementation alliances in Japanese electronics, 1985–1998 James R. Lincoln,1,* Didier Guillot,2 and Matthew Sargent3 1Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. e-mail: [email protected], 2Fukui Prefectural University, Fukui 910-1195, Japan. e-mail: [email protected] Downloaded from and 3USC Digital Humanities Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. e-mail: [email protected] *Main author for correspondence. http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/ Abstract This paper examines the changing process of strategic alliance formation in the Japanese electronics industry between 1985 and 1998. With data on 123–135 Japanese electronics/electrical machinery makers, we use a dyad panel regression methodology to address hypotheses drawn largely from em- beddedness theory on how the firms’ horizontal and vertical keiretsu business group affiliations and prior alliance networks supported and constrained partner choice in new R&D (innovation) and nonR&D (implementation) domestic economy alliances. We find that in the first half of our series (1985–1991; the “preburst” period), keiretsu served as infrastructure for new strategic alliances that by guest on September 11, 2016 had both innovation (R&D) and implementation (nonR&D) goals.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trading Companies: Building on the Japanese Model Robert W
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 4 Issue 2 Fall Fall 1982 International Trading Companies: Building on the Japanese Model Robert W. Dziubla Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert W. Dziubla, International Trading Companies: Building on the Japanese Model, 4 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 422 (1982) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business International Trading Companies: Building On The Japanese Model Robert W. Dziubla* Passageof the Export Trading Company Act of 1982provides new op- portunitiesfor American business to organize and operate general trading companies. Afterpresenting a thorough history and description of the Japa- nese sogoshosha, Mr. Dziubla gives several compelling reasonsfor Ameri- cans to establish export trading companies. He also examines the changes in United States banking and antitrust laws that have resultedfrom passage of the act, and offers suggestionsfor draftingguidelines, rules, and regula- tionsfor the Export Trading Company Act. For several years, American legislators and businessmen have warned that if America is to balance its international trade-and in particular offset the cost of importing billions of dollars worth of oil- she must take concrete steps to increase her exporting capabilities., On October 8, 1982, the United States took just such a step when President Reagan signed into law the Export Trading Company Act of 1982,2 which provides for the development of international general trading companies similar to the ones used so successfully by the Japanese.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd.<8424>
    COMPANY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. 8424 Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section 17-Feb.-2020 FISCO Ltd. Analyst Ikuo Shibata FISCO Ltd. http://www.fisco.co.jp 02 COMPANY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT FISCO Ltd. http://www.fisco.co.jp Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. 17-Feb.-2020 8424 Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section https://www.fgl.co.jp/eng/ ■ Index ■Summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 1. Company profile .......................................................................................................................................... 01 2. Medium-term management plan ................................................................................................................. 01 3. Summary of 1H FY3/20 results ................................................................................................................... 01 4. FY3/20 results outlook ................................................................................................................................ 02 ■Company profile --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 03 1. Business overview ...................................................................................................................................... 03 2. History .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Japanese Industrial Groups and Their Potential Impact on U
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Empirical Studies of Commercial Policy Volume Author/Editor: Robert E. Baldwin, editor Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press, 1991 Volume ISBN: 0-226-03569-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bald91-1 Conference Date: March 16-17, 1990 Publication Date: January 1991 Chapter Title: Characteristics of Japanese Industrial Groups and Their Potential Impact on U. S . - Japanese Trade Chapter Author: K.C. Fung Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c6712 Chapter pages in book: (p. 137 - 168) 5 Characteristics of Japanese Industrial Groups and Their Potential Impact on U. S .- Japanese Trade K. C. Fung 5.1 Introduction Given the economic importance of the two nations, the economic relation- ship between the United States and Japan is perhaps the most significant bilat- eral economic linkage in the world economy today. Unfortunately, the domi- nant feature of the relationship in recent years has been disputes about trade. The core of the problem is undoubtedly the persistent trade imbalance be- tween the two nations. The magnitude of the trade imbalance remains large, The United States ran a merchandise trade deficit of over $1 18.5 billion in 1988, and $109 billion in 1989. Japan had a global trade surplus of $78.3 billion in 1988 and $65 billion in 1989. On a bilateral level, the trade imbalance between the United States and Japan was $5 1.8 billion in 1988 and $49 billions in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT of KOREAN and JAPANESE BIG BUSINESS GROUPS: a Comparison Study Between Korean General Trading Companies and Japanese Sogo Shoshas
    THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF KOREAN AND JAPANESE BIG BUSINESS GROUPS: A Comparison Study between Korean General Trading Companies and Japanese Sogo Shoshas by IN WOO JUN A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Management The Birmingham Business School The University of Birmingham August, 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This research is an in-depth study of Korean GTCs (General Trading Companies) and Japanese Sogo Shoshas (the Japanese version of General Trading Companies), which are unique big business conglomerates but not well-known in Western countries. It investigates and compares several of their features, such as their history, characteristics, functions, organisational structure, corporate culture, human resource management, their impact on national economic development, strategic management and decision-making process. First, it examines a wide range of literature to show the functions of Korean GTCs and Japanese Sogo Shoshas as transaction intermediaries, information gatherers, project organisers, international marketers, financial providers, etc. With these varied functions, they have played significant roles not only from the macro aspect, but also the micro aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuyo Lease Group Integrated Report 2019 Report Integrated Group Lease Fuyo
    Fuyo Lease Group Integrated Report 2019 Fuyo Lease Group Integrated Report 2019 3-3-23, Kanda-Misaki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8380, Japan Phone: +81-3-5275-8800 https://www.fgl.co.jp/eng/ dummy For inquiries about “Integrated Report 2019,” please contact: Creating Shared Value Promotion Office TEL: +81-3-6679-2520 E-mail: [email protected] 01 Corporate Slogan Fuyo Lease Group Integrated Report 2019 02 Management Philosophy We support corporate activities through our leasing business with view to contributing to development of the society. Go Where No One Has We maintain customer's first philosophy, providing best services. We aim to earn high marks from shareholders and markets while Gone Before pursuing creativity and innovation. We create a challenging and rewarding workplace where employees think and act on their own. We believe. Leasing is not just about lending things. It's about lending inspiration, intelligence and a sense of wonder. CONTENTS We believe. P01 Corporate Slogan P21 Special Feature 1 Climate Change Initiatives We embrace challenges, because they are the fountain of new business. P02 Contents P23 Special Feature 2 INVOICE P03 Message from the President P25 Business Segments Overview We believe. P07 Corporate History P35 Foundation for Value Creation Meeting expectations is our duty. Exceeding them is our profession. P09 Introduction of Fuyo Lease Group P41 Board Members P11 Financial and Non-Financial Highlights P43 Corporate Governance We believe. P13 Value Creation Story P47 Risk Management and Compliance System Succeeding is easy when times are good, but true partners are there even in the hard times.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Production Networks in Asia
    Working Paper 01.07 Regionalizing Relationalism: Japanese Production Networks in Asia Walter Hatch University of Washington MIT International Science and Technology Initiatives INt-· I a F- ___>· -·ll·· 1-~----· MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.07 Regionalizing Relationalism: Japanese Production Networks in Asia Walter Hatch Tamaki Fellow Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington 431 Thomson Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] MIT Japan Program Working Paper Series 01.07 Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E38-7th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-252-1483 Fax: 617-258-7432 Date of Publication: June 18, 2001 ( MIT Japan Program Introduction Japan's techno-industrial regime, which I call "relationalism," has proved remarkably resilient in the face of powerful market and political forces for change.' Despite a decade of slow or no growth, it continues to be held together by a dense web of longstanding and mutually reinforcing relationships between government and business, between nominally independent firms, and between labor and management. This is not to say that Japan is immutable. It clearly is undergoing change in the distribution of economic gains and losses, as evidenced by growing income inequality. The "big tent" of relationalism today protects fewer Japanese citizens than it has at any other time in the post-war period. But the tent itself is still standing tall. Consider some of the following claims made by those who say Japan is undergoing significant structural change, as well as evidence suggesting the contrary: * The government has implemented regulatory and administrative reforms that appear to diminish its once significant role in private market matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I: Japan's Distribution System and Options for Improving U.S. Access
    PHASE I: JAPAN'S DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND OPTIONS FOR IMPROVING U.S. ACCESS Report to the House Committee on Ways and Means on Investigation No. 332-283 Under Section 332 (g) ,· of the Tariff Act of 1930 · USITC PUBLICATION 2291 JUNE 1990 United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Anne E. Brunsdale, Chairman Ronald A. Cass, Vice Chairman Alfred E. Eckes Seeley G. Lodwick David B. Rohr Don E. Newquist Office of Economics John W. Suomela, Director Trade Reports Division Martin F. Smith, Chief Diane L. Manifold Project Leader Judith Czako Kim S. Frankena Paul R. Gibson Michael Hagey Andrew Wylegala Principal Authors Assistance was also provided by Gerald Berg, Richard Bo/tuck, Robert Feinberg, Joseph Shaanan, Janet Whisler, and Salvatore Scanio, Intern. Data assistance was provided by Dean M. Moore. Supporting assistance was provided by Paula R. Wells and Linda Cooper. Address all communications to Kenneth R. Mason, Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 PREFACE On October 23, 1989, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) received a letter from the House Committee on Ways and Means (presented as appendix A) requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation, in two phases, under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to Japan's distribution system and options for improving U.S. access to that system. In response to the request from the House Ways and Means Committee, the Commission instituted investigation No. 332-283 on November 13, 1989. The first phase of the report was to be submitted on June 22, 1990 and Phase II of the report by October 23, 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Alliances in Japanese Firms' Overseas
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS ASYMMETRIC ALLIANCES IN JAPANESE FIRMS’ OVERSEAS INVESTMENT HU TIANYOU A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN MANAGMENT DEPARTMENT OF STRATEGY AND POLICY NUS BUSINESS SCHOOL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2016 1 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first son was born in the spring of 2013 when I just finished my coursework in National University of Singapore and started with this dissertation. I named him Jinfeng (謹豐), which meant “to complete oneself prudently” in Chinese. I fetched these two beautiful characters from a verse of the great poet Qu Yuan (屈原), in the hope that it stimulates my son to be fond of learning and motivates myself in my PhD study. I dedicate this piece of work to my wife, Liu Zheng, who gave up a good job and a comfortable life in Beijing to work as my cook, secretary and research assistant in Singapore. Fully engaged in my study, I was no more than a giant baby that not only helped nothing with housework but also had aperiodic depression due to the harshness of research. I could never have finished this dissertation without her support and sacrifice. This dissertation is also impossible without the supervision and help of Professor Andrew Delios.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACKROCK INVESTMENT STEWARDSHIP 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Our Mission in Context: 2017-2018 Highlights
    BlackRock Investment Stewardship 2018 Annual Report August 30, 2018 The Investment Stewardship Annual Report reviews BlackRock’s approach to corporate governance and stewardship in support of long- Contents term value creation for our clients. In this report we Annual Report provide practical examples of the Investment Stewardship team’s work over the year, distilling Our global and local focus 1 some of the trends and company-specific Our mission in context: situations reported in our regional quarterly 2017-2018 highlights 2 reports. We emphasize the outcome of our Our achievements over the past year 3 engagements with companies, including some which have spanned several years. We also Our principles, priorities and engagement commentaries 5 provide examples of where we have contributed to the public discourse on corporate governance and Engagement and voting case studies 7 investment stewardship. Engagement and voting statistics 20 Investor perspective and public policy 21 Appendix List of companies engaged 25 Our Annual Report reporting period is July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, representing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) 12-month reporting period for U.S. mutual funds, including iShares. Our global and local focus BlackRock’s number one focus, as a fiduciary investor, is on generating the long-term sustainable financial returns on which our clients depend to meet their financial goals. Investment Stewardship is focused on assessing the quality of management, board leadership and standards of operational excellence – in aggregate, corporate governance – at the public companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients. We see this responsibility as part of our fiduciary duty, through which we contribute to BlackRock’s mission to create a better financial future for our clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Groups, Networks, and Embeddedness: Innovation and Implementation Alliances in Japanese Electronics, 1985-1998
    IRLE IRLE WORKING PAPER #100-11 May 2011 Business Groups, Networks, And Embeddedness: Innovation And Implementation Alliances In Japanese Electronics, 1985-1998 James R. Lin c oln and Didier Guillot Cite as: James R. Lin c oln and Didier Guillot. (2 0 11). “Busine s s G r oups, Net w orks, And Embeddedne s s: Inn o vation And Implementation Alliances In Japanese Electronics, 1985-1998.” IRLE Working Paper No. 100-11. http://irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers/100-11.pdf irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers Institute for Research on Labor and Employment UC Berkeley Peer Reviewed Title: Business Groups, Networks, And Embeddedness: Innovation And Implementation Alliances In Japanese Electronics, 1985-1998 Author: Lincoln, James R., University of California, Berkeley Guillot, Didier, Chinese University of Hong Kong Publication Date: 05-02-2011 Series: Working Paper Series Publication Info: Working Paper Series, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/35g695gn Abstract: This paper examines the changing process of strategic alliance formation in the Japanese electronics industry between 1985 and 1998. With data on 123-135 Japanese electronics/ electrical machinery makers, we use a dyad panel regression methodology to address a series of hypotheses drawn largely from embeddedness theory on how the firms’ horizontal and vertical keiretsu business group affiliations and prior alliance networks supported and constrained partner choice in new R&D (innovation) and nonR&D (implementation) domestic economy alliances. We find that in the first half of our series (1985-91; the “preburst” period) keiretsu served as infrastructure or platform for new strategic alliances that had both innovation and implementation goals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Diiferent View on Japanese Corporate Groups
    Chapter 1. Introduction Mathematics is the study of analogies between analo- gies. All science is. Scientists want to show that things that don’t look alike are really the same. That is one of their innermost Freudian motivations. In fact, that is what we mean by understanding.1 Gian-Carlo Rota Japan is different from the West,2 or so we are often told. However, thanks to the tide of multiculturalism, being different is no longer considered being inferior to the West, and now there is a stable demand for the study, both academic and practical, of Japanese economy. Dun & Bradstreet (Morrison et al. 1997) gives us many useful tips on cultural difference for U.S. executives. 1. Education, however, is the seminal event in the lives of most... citizens. [Their] schools are rigorous, assigning so much homework that children have little time for either mischief or other activities. 2. [This country] remains a patriarchal country. Women’s rights have come late to [this country]; it wasn’t until 1923 that women acquired the right to open their own mail! Sexual harassment has been illegal only since 1992. 3. Social factors are as important as religion towards regulating [their] behavior. There is a great desire for order and control. 4. [They] are sticklers for titles. Try to address people by their full, correct title, no matter how extraordinarily long that title may seem to foreigners. 1 Rota (1997, p. 214). 2 Despite the pervasive and uncritical use of the word, it is unclear what “the West” (or ” western”) means, no less “the East.” See Lewis and Wigen (1997) for the critical assessment of the West/something else bi- narism.
    [Show full text]