BLACKROCK INVESTMENT STEWARDSHIP 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Our Mission in Context: 2017-2018 Highlights

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BLACKROCK INVESTMENT STEWARDSHIP 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Our Mission in Context: 2017-2018 Highlights BlackRock Investment Stewardship 2018 Annual Report August 30, 2018 The Investment Stewardship Annual Report reviews BlackRock’s approach to corporate governance and stewardship in support of long- Contents term value creation for our clients. In this report we Annual Report provide practical examples of the Investment Stewardship team’s work over the year, distilling Our global and local focus 1 some of the trends and company-specific Our mission in context: situations reported in our regional quarterly 2017-2018 highlights 2 reports. We emphasize the outcome of our Our achievements over the past year 3 engagements with companies, including some which have spanned several years. We also Our principles, priorities and engagement commentaries 5 provide examples of where we have contributed to the public discourse on corporate governance and Engagement and voting case studies 7 investment stewardship. Engagement and voting statistics 20 Investor perspective and public policy 21 Appendix List of companies engaged 25 Our Annual Report reporting period is July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, representing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) 12-month reporting period for U.S. mutual funds, including iShares. Our global and local focus BlackRock’s number one focus, as a fiduciary investor, is on generating the long-term sustainable financial returns on which our clients depend to meet their financial goals. Investment Stewardship is focused on assessing the quality of management, board leadership and standards of operational excellence – in aggregate, corporate governance – at the public companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients. We see this responsibility as part of our fiduciary duty, through which we contribute to BlackRock’s mission to create a better financial future for our clients. BlackRock has had an investment stewardship function for over two decades. Our practices have evolved over the years, in line with changing client and company expectations. A more recent, and significant, change is the scrutiny of asset managers’ investment stewardship activities. Not only has client interest increased, we have seen far greater interest from regulators, the media and academics, amongst others. Accordingly, we recently published a ViewPoint entitled The Investment Stewardship Ecosystem in which we set out the roles of the different participants in determining investment stewardship outcomes. Some commentators have conflated the roles and responsibilities of asset owners, asset managers, index providers and proxy research firms, which has created misperceptions about where accountabilities lie. In addition, some have overstated the role that investors can play in influencing companies’ governance practices. We emphasize in the ViewPoint that investment stewardship is a feedback mechanism through which BlackRock, as a long-term investor on behalf of our clients, can help build mutual understanding with companies. One misperception related to voting at shareholder meetings equates ‘good stewardship’ with voting against management. Yet the vast majority of items that go to a vote are routine. Even the more controversial items are much more complex than a binary ‘for’ or ‘against’ vote decision. In our view, engagement with companies is more productive, as it allows us to explain our perspective on issues and how, in our assessment, they are relevant to investment decision-making, including stewardship. The public debate is often polarized. But, in our experience, practitioners tend to take a more nuanced and pragmatic approach focused on encouraging business and governance practices aligned with long-term shareholder value creation. Measuring success in stewardship needs to focus on change over the long-term as meaningful changes in business and governance practices don’t happen in a single quarter, and maybe not even in one year. We use our voice as an investor to provide feedback and encourage what we consider to be good governance. Company boards and management determine the strategic and operational priorities that in their judgment will best serve the interests of all the investors in their company. Market-level change requires hundreds of companies to change and thus takes time. Each region has its own examples of that kind of market-level change. As this report illustrates for the 2017/18 year, Investment Stewardship has been active in encouraging changes that we consider important to long-term value. Looking forward, we will continue to contribute to the dialogue at the company- and market-level to enhance business, governance and stewardship practices that are aligned with the long-term economic interests of our clients. Barbara Novick Michelle Edkins Vice Chairman Global Head of Investment Stewardship BLACKROCK INVESTMENT STEWARDSHIP 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Our mission in context: 2017-2018 highlights BlackRock seeks to create a better financial future for our clients. As we pursue that mission, we're guided by our focus on generating long-term sustainable performance for our clients. Investment Stewardship contributes to this objective by engaging with companies on governance and other business practices impacting their long-term financial performance and by voting at shareholder meetings. Our team and its work has continuously evolved in response to changing developments and expectations. But one thing has remained constant: our focus on protecting and enhancing the long-term value of our clients’ assets. That focus has led to numerous tangible outcomes which we detail in the following pages of this report. Our team’s key responsibilities are to: Protect and enhance the value Encourage governance and Provide specialist insight of clients' assets through business practices that in on governance engagement with companies, our experience support considerations including including proxy voting, in companies to deliver environmental and clients’ best long-term sustainable long-term social factors to economic interests financial performance BlackRock’s investors OVER 2,000 RELEASED UPDATED COMMITTED TO ENGAGEMENTS 2018 ENGAGEMENT DOUBLING TEAM THIS PAST YEAR PRIORITIES SIZE BY 2020 CONTINUED OUR PARTICIPATED PARTICIPATION IN IN OVER OVER 30 GOVERNANCE 275 CLIENT ORGANIZATIONS MEETINGS GLOBALLY Engage clients to build an Participate in market-level understanding of their dialogue to understand and expectations and areas of contribute to the development of focus and how our policies and practices that work aligns support long-term investing and value creation BLACKROCK INVESTMENT STEWARDSHIP 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2 Our achievements over the past year BlackRock has maintained an in-house team dedicated to investment stewardship since the late 1980s. A lot has changed since then. If you compare today’s governance norms to those of ten years ago, you see a significant shift both in terms of the breadth of engagement topics and the increased number of shareholder meetings at which votes are cast. Engagement is particularly important for index managers, where we cannot sell a company’s shares to express a view on its long-term outlook if it remains in an index in which our clients choose to invest. Expanding the team’s capabilities In 2008 (the year BlackRock became a UN Principles for Responsible Investment signatory), our team consisted of 13 full-time employees voting at approximately 8,500 meetings. Our team has nearly tripled and now has 36 regional specialists located in seven offices who vote at more than twice the number of meetings (over 17,000 this past reporting period) than we did a decade ago. The Investment Stewardship team has expanded in the past year, adding team members in Singapore, Australia, and New York. Increasing client expectations around stewardship means that we must continue to invest in technology and human capital. We believe these initiatives will lead to deeper and more robust engagements with companies. Stewardship partners with BlackRock’s Global Public Policy Group (GPPG) Increasingly, public policy issues are intersecting with stewardship, as policy makers and other stakeholders recognize the importance of the role that institutional investors – both asset owners and asset managers – can play in corporate governance and shareholder engagement. There is significant overlap and both contribute to BlackRock’s key objective: to represent the interests of the millions of savers and pensioners who entrust us with their capital to help them achieve a better financial future. For this reason, we have brought the stewardship and public policy teams closer together this year under the leadership of Vice Chairman Barbara Novick. The intersection of public policy with stewardship revolves around topics like the regulation of public companies and their disclosures, capital formation, the complex operating environment for proxy voting, the appropriateness of dual class structures, and regional stewardship codes, among many others. In Section VII – Investor perspective and public policy, we detail some of this work including our stance on dual class shares and our efforts around the EU Shareholder Rights Directive II. Director Dialogue 2018 In March 2018, we hosted our first US Director Dialogue in New York, an event attended by nearly 60 representatives over half of which were company directors from 27 companies with whom we had not previously engaged on stewardship. The event provided an opportunity to introduce our team and its function within BlackRock and to meet independent directors in person
Recommended publications
  • DXE Liquidity Provider Registered Firms
    DXE Liquidity Provider Program Registered Securities European Equities TheCboe following Europe Limited list of symbols specifies which firms are registered to supply liquidity for each symbol in 2021-09-28: 1COVd - Covestro AG Citadel Securities GCS (Ireland) Limited (Program Three) DRW Europe B.V. (Program Three) HRTEU Limited (Program Two) Jane Street Financial Limited (Program Three) Jump Trading Europe B.V. (Program Three) Qube Master Fund Limited (Program One) Societe Generale SA (Program Three) 1U1d - 1&1 AG Citadel Securities GCS (Ireland) Limited (Program Three) HRTEU Limited (Program Two) Jane Street Financial Limited (Program Three) 2GBd - 2G Energy AG Citadel Securities GCS (Ireland) Limited (Program Three) Jane Street Financial Limited (Program Three) 3BALm - WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged HRTEU Limited (Program One) 3DELm - WisdomTree DAX 30 3x Daily Leveraged HRTEU Limited (Program One) 3ITLm - WisdomTree FTSE MIB 3x Daily Leveraged HRTEU Limited (Program One) 3ITSm - WisdomTree FTSE MIB 3x Daily Short HRTEU Limited (Program One) 8TRAd - Traton SE Jane Street Financial Limited (Program Three) 8TRAs - Traton SE Jane Street Financial Limited (Program Three) Cboe Europe Limited is a Recognised Investment Exchange regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Cboe Europe Limited is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and is a company registered in England and Wales with Company Number 6547680 and registered office at 11 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AF. This document has been established for information purposes only. The data contained herein is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed. None of the information concerning the services or products described in this document constitutes advice or a recommendation of any product or service.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Actions Concernées Par L'interdiction De Positions Courtes Nettes
    Liste des actions concernées par l'interdiction de positions courtes nettes L’interdiction s’applique aux actions listées sur une plate-forme française et relevant de la compétence de l’AMF au titre du règlement 236/2012 (information disponible dans les registres ESMA). Cette liste est fournie à titre informatif. L'AMF n'est pas en mesure de garantir que le contenu disponible est complet, exact ou à jour. Compte tenu des diverses sources de données sous- jacentes, des modifications pourraient être apportées régulièrement. Isin Nom FR0010285965 1000MERCIS FR0013341781 2CRSI FR0010050773 A TOUTE VITESSE FR0000076887 A.S.T. GROUPE FR0010557264 AB SCIENCE FR0004040608 ABC ARBITRAGE FR0013185857 ABEO FR0012616852 ABIONYX PHARMA FR0012333284 ABIVAX FR0000064602 ACANTHE DEV. FR0000120404 ACCOR FR0010493510 ACHETER-LOUER.FR FR0000076861 ACTEOS FR0000076655 ACTIA GROUP FR0011038348 ACTIPLAY (GROUPE) FR0010979377 ACTIVIUM GROUP FR0000053076 ADA BE0974269012 ADC SIIC FR0013284627 ADEUNIS FR0000062978 ADL PARTNER FR0011184241 ADOCIA FR0013247244 ADOMOS FR0010340141 ADP FR0010457531 ADTHINK FR0012821890 ADUX FR0004152874 ADVENIS FR0013296746 ADVICENNE FR0000053043 ADVINI US00774B2088 AERKOMM INC FR0011908045 AG3I ES0105422002 AGARTHA REAL EST FR0013452281 AGRIPOWER FR0010641449 AGROGENERATION CH0008853209 AGTA RECORD FR0000031122 AIR FRANCE -KLM FR0000120073 AIR LIQUIDE FR0013285103 AIR MARINE NL0000235190 AIRBUS FR0004180537 AKKA TECHNOLOGIES FR0000053027 AKWEL FR0000060402 ALBIOMA FR0013258662 ALD FR0000054652 ALES GROUPE FR0000053324 ALPES (COMPAGNIE)
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Vote on Trump Trial Signals an Acquittal Is Likely
    P2JW027000-6-A00100-17FFFF5178F ****** WEDNESDAY,JANUARY27, 2021 ~VOL. CCLXXVII NO.21 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 DJIA 30937.04 g 22.96 0.1% NASDAQ 13626.06 g 0.1% STOXX 600 407.70 À 0.6% 10-YR. TREAS. unch , yield 1.039% OIL $52.61 g $0.16 GOLD $1,850.70 g $4.20 EURO $1.2162 YEN 103.62 In India, Farmers’ Protest Over New Law Turns Violent Microsoft What’s News SalesRise 17%Amid Business&Finance Covid-19 icrosoftposted record Mquarterly sales under- pinned by pandemic-fueled Pandemic demand forvideogaming and accelerated adoption of itscloud-computing services Demand for cloud during the health crisis. A1 services, videogaming Walgreens Bootsnamed Starbucks operating chief fuels earnings during Rosalind Brewerasits next work-from-home era CEO,making her the only Black woman leading a BY AARON TILLEY Fortune 500 company. A1 CK J&J said it expectstore- TO MicrosoftCorp. posted re- port pivotal resultsofalarge cord quarterly sales under- clinical trial of itsCovid-19 SHUTTERS pinned by pandemic-fueled de- vaccine by early next week, A/ mand forvideogaming and as the companyposted im- I/EP accelerated adoption of its AG proved quarterly sales. B1 TY cloud-computing services dur- ing the health crisis. GE booked $4.4billion Theremote-work erahas in fourth-quarter cash HARISH STREET CLASH: Indian farmers clash with police in New Delhi on Tuesday after breaking through barriers to escape po- been a boon for Microsoft. In flow,beating itsown pro- lice-approved routes for a tractor rally that coincided with a military parade celebrating India’s Republic Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Flyer Ambition4climate
    Ambition4Climate.com platform AFEP large member companies invest in climate action with concrete projects The Ambition4Climate Internet platform initiated in 2021 by AFEP (the French Association of Large Companies) illustrates the solutions concretely implemented by large companies to meet the challenge of climate neutrality. Low carbon • Recent operational solutions projects? • Mostly replicable • Resulting in significant greenhouse gas emission reductions • In all sectors of activity • Make actions more easily understandable Objectives ? for experts and the general public • Share good practices • Communicate the characteristics of concrete projects (investment and profitability data) • Foster informed dialogue between companies and interested parties Analytical • Factual and quantified sheets to assess the carbon framework? impact of each project • Systematic identification and quantification of greenhouse gas emissions according to different parameters (emissions induced by the project, avoided emissions, emission removals) More information on ambition4climate.com Climate action is a strategic issue for large French companies The 7 levers to reduce carbon dependency Energy Energy efficiency Improvement Decarbonisation improvement of non-energy resource efficiency Examples Examples Examples • Development of hydrogen mobility • New generation ventilation • Use of solar and wind energy systems • Energy renovation • Development of bio-based • Use of biofuels • Installation of buildings • Monitoring and materials • Development of low of biomass
    [Show full text]
  • Business Groups, Networks, and Embeddedness: Innovation and Implementation Alliances in Japanese Electronics, 1985–1998
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Business groups, networks, and embeddedness: innovation and implementation alliances in Japanese electronics, 1985–1998 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3dq9f64q Journal Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(3) Authors Lincoln, James R Guillot, Didier Sargent, Matthew Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Industrial and Corporate Change Advance Access published September 10, 2016 Industrial and Corporate Change, 2016, 1–22 doi: 10.1093/icc/dtw037 Original article Business groups, networks, and embeddedness: innovation and implementation alliances in Japanese electronics, 1985–1998 James R. Lincoln,1,* Didier Guillot,2 and Matthew Sargent3 1Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. e-mail: [email protected], 2Fukui Prefectural University, Fukui 910-1195, Japan. e-mail: [email protected] Downloaded from and 3USC Digital Humanities Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. e-mail: [email protected] *Main author for correspondence. http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/ Abstract This paper examines the changing process of strategic alliance formation in the Japanese electronics industry between 1985 and 1998. With data on 123–135 Japanese electronics/electrical machinery makers, we use a dyad panel regression methodology to address hypotheses drawn largely from em- beddedness theory on how the firms’ horizontal and vertical keiretsu business group affiliations and prior alliance networks supported and constrained partner choice in new R&D (innovation) and nonR&D (implementation) domestic economy alliances. We find that in the first half of our series (1985–1991; the “preburst” period), keiretsu served as infrastructure for new strategic alliances that by guest on September 11, 2016 had both innovation (R&D) and implementation (nonR&D) goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Display's the Thing: the Real Stakes in the Conflict Over High Resolution Displays
    Display's the Thing: The Real Stakes in the Conflict Over High Resolution Displays Jeffrey Hart and Michael Borrus (c) Copyright Hart and Borrus 1992 I. Display's the Thing: The Real Stakes In the Conflict Over High- Resolution Displays In Akira Kurasawa's film _Rashomon_, several witnesses to a murder tell the story of what they saw. Despite viewing the same event, the witnesses' stories are radically different, so much so that the event itself is ultimately called into question. So has it been with the debate over the next generation of high- resolution video technology. Some look and see a bigger and better television set (high-definition television or HDTV), but usually dismiss what they see as economically (though perhaps not politically) insignificant.1 Others look and see a significant component technology (high-resolution displays or HRD) beginning to pervade a wide variety of electronic systems. They recognize in displays a technological kinship to silicon chips -- an industry with potential strategic significance for commercial and military applications. But the conflict of perspectives should not, as it did in _Rashomon_, cast doubt on the event. The high-resolution display industry is a symbol of a major transformation underway in electronics: that is, the emergence of new component, machinery, and materials technologies driven by commercial, high-volume, integrated micro-systems applications and controlled increasingly by a few integrated producers located outside the United States. This paper argues that the industrial and geographic concentration of the sourcing, development, production, and integration of electronics technologies and systems in Asia portends new patterns of industrial constraint and opportunity, with significant economic and military implications.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trading Companies: Building on the Japanese Model Robert W
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 4 Issue 2 Fall Fall 1982 International Trading Companies: Building on the Japanese Model Robert W. Dziubla Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert W. Dziubla, International Trading Companies: Building on the Japanese Model, 4 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 422 (1982) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business International Trading Companies: Building On The Japanese Model Robert W. Dziubla* Passageof the Export Trading Company Act of 1982provides new op- portunitiesfor American business to organize and operate general trading companies. Afterpresenting a thorough history and description of the Japa- nese sogoshosha, Mr. Dziubla gives several compelling reasonsfor Ameri- cans to establish export trading companies. He also examines the changes in United States banking and antitrust laws that have resultedfrom passage of the act, and offers suggestionsfor draftingguidelines, rules, and regula- tionsfor the Export Trading Company Act. For several years, American legislators and businessmen have warned that if America is to balance its international trade-and in particular offset the cost of importing billions of dollars worth of oil- she must take concrete steps to increase her exporting capabilities., On October 8, 1982, the United States took just such a step when President Reagan signed into law the Export Trading Company Act of 1982,2 which provides for the development of international general trading companies similar to the ones used so successfully by the Japanese.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkema Prospectus
    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES ENGLISH LANGUAGE TRANSLATION FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY This document is a free translation of the French language prospectus that received from the Autoriteπ des marchesπ financiers (the ""AMF'') visa number 06-106 on 5 April 2006 (the ""French Prospectus''). It has not been approved by the AMF. This translation has been prepared solely for the information and convenience of shareholders of TOTAL S.A. and Elf Aquitaine. No assurances are given as to the accuracy or completeness of this translation, and ARKEMA and TOTAL assume no responsibility with respect to this translation or any misstatement or omission that may be contained therein. In the event of any ambiguity or discrepancy between this translation and the French Prospectus, the French Prospectus shall prevail. No securities are being offered for sale or subscription in connection with the Spin-Off of Arkema's Businesses and, accordingly, neither the French Prospectus nor this translation is intended to be an offer to sell or to subscribe for or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or to subscribe for the shares described herein, especially in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the laws of that jurisdiction. The securities of ARKEMA have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an exemption from registration. PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LISTING ARKEMA SHARES ON EUROLIST BY EURONEXTTM IN CONNECTION WITH THE ALLOCATION OF ARKEMA SHARES TO TOTAL S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Published on 7 October 2016 1. Constituents Change the Result Of
    The result of periodic review and component stocks of TOPIX Composite 1500(effective 31 October 2016) Published on 7 October 2016 1. Constituents Change Addition( 70 ) Deletion( 60 ) Code Issue Code Issue 1810 MATSUI CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. 1868 Mitsui Home Co.,Ltd. 1972 SANKO METAL INDUSTRIAL CO.,LTD. 2196 ESCRIT INC. 2117 Nissin Sugar Co.,Ltd. 2198 IKK Inc. 2124 JAC Recruitment Co.,Ltd. 2418 TSUKADA GLOBAL HOLDINGS Inc. 2170 Link and Motivation Inc. 3079 DVx Inc. 2337 Ichigo Inc. 3093 Treasure Factory Co.,LTD. 2359 CORE CORPORATION 3194 KIRINDO HOLDINGS CO.,LTD. 2429 WORLD HOLDINGS CO.,LTD. 3205 DAIDOH LIMITED 2462 J-COM Holdings Co.,Ltd. 3667 enish,inc. 2485 TEAR Corporation 3834 ASAHI Net,Inc. 2492 Infomart Corporation 3946 TOMOKU CO.,LTD. 2915 KENKO Mayonnaise Co.,Ltd. 4221 Okura Industrial Co.,Ltd. 3179 Syuppin Co.,Ltd. 4238 Miraial Co.,Ltd. 3193 Torikizoku co.,ltd. 4331 TAKE AND GIVE. NEEDS Co.,Ltd. 3196 HOTLAND Co.,Ltd. 4406 New Japan Chemical Co.,Ltd. 3199 Watahan & Co.,Ltd. 4538 Fuso Pharmaceutical Industries,Ltd. 3244 Samty Co.,Ltd. 4550 Nissui Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd. 3250 A.D.Works Co.,Ltd. 4636 T&K TOKA CO.,LTD. 3543 KOMEDA Holdings Co.,Ltd. 4651 SANIX INCORPORATED 3636 Mitsubishi Research Institute,Inc. 4809 Paraca Inc. 3654 HITO-Communications,Inc. 5204 ISHIZUKA GLASS CO.,LTD. 3666 TECNOS JAPAN INCORPORATED 5998 Advanex Inc. 3678 MEDIA DO Co.,Ltd. 6203 Howa Machinery,Ltd. 3688 VOYAGE GROUP,INC. 6319 SNT CORPORATION 3694 OPTiM CORPORATION 6362 Ishii Iron Works Co.,Ltd. 3724 VeriServe Corporation 6373 DAIDO KOGYO CO.,LTD. 3765 GungHo Online Entertainment,Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd.<8424>
    COMPANY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. 8424 Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section 17-Feb.-2020 FISCO Ltd. Analyst Ikuo Shibata FISCO Ltd. http://www.fisco.co.jp 02 COMPANY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT FISCO Ltd. http://www.fisco.co.jp Fuyo General Lease Co., Ltd. 17-Feb.-2020 8424 Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section https://www.fgl.co.jp/eng/ ■ Index ■Summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 1. Company profile .......................................................................................................................................... 01 2. Medium-term management plan ................................................................................................................. 01 3. Summary of 1H FY3/20 results ................................................................................................................... 01 4. FY3/20 results outlook ................................................................................................................................ 02 ■Company profile --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 03 1. Business overview ...................................................................................................................................... 03 2. History .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IS-BAO Registrations : Operators | IS-BAO Organizations On-Line Listing Sep-25-2021 09:51 AM
    IS-BAO Registrations : Operators | IS-BAO Organizations On-Line Listing Sep-25-2021 09:51 AM IS-BAO Organizations On-Line Listing Organization City Country Registration ID# BestFly Limitada Luanda Angola 750 Revesco Aviation Pty Ltd Perth Australia 187 Walker Air Service Mascot Australia 2628 Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section) Brisbane Australia 2384 Australian Corporate Jet Centres Pty Ltd Essendon Australia 756 Consolidated Press Holdings Pty Ltd Sydney Australia 361 Westfield/LFG Aviation Group Australia Sydney Australia 339 Business Aviation Solutions Bilinga Australia 2283 ExecuJet Australia Mascot Australia 510 International Jet Management GmbH Schwechat Austria 2319 Avcon Jet Wien Austria 2290 Sparfell Luftfahrt GmbH Schwechat Austria 2385 Tyrolean Jet Services GmbH Innsbruck Austria 274 Squadron Aviation Services Ltd Hamilton Bermuda 189 Trans World Oil Ltd. dba T.W.O. Air (Bermuda) Ltd Hamilton Bermuda 197 S&K Bermuda Ltd. Pembroke Bermuda 45 Minera San Cristobal S.A. La Paz Bolivia 733 Vale SA Rio de Janeiro Brazil 560 AVANTTO Administração de Aeronaves Sao Paulo Brazil 654 PAIC Participacoes Ltda Sao Paulo Brazil 480 Lider Taxi Aereo S/A Brasil Belo Horizonte Brazil 48 EMAR Taxi Aereo Rio das Ostras Brazil 2615 ICON Taxi Aereo Ltda. São Paulo Brazil 2476 Banco Bradesco S/A Osasco Brazil 2527 M. Square Holding Ltd. Road Town British Virgin Islands 2309 London Air Services Limited dba London Air Services South Richmond Canada 2289 Chartright Air Group Mississauga Canada 432 ACASS Canada Ltd. Montreal Canada 102 Sunwest Aviation Ltd Calgary Canada 105 Air Partners Corporation Calgary Canada 764 Coulson Aviation (USA) Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion™ Aims to Rally the Business Community to Advance Diversity & Inclusion Within
    The CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion™ aims to rally the business community to advance diversity & inclusion within the workplace by working collectively across organizations and sectors. It outlines a specific set of actions the undersigned companies will take to cultivate a trusting environment where all ideas are welcomed and employees feel comfortable and empowered to discuss diversity & inclusion. All the signatories serve as leaders of their companies and have committed to implementing the following pledge within their workplaces. Where companies have already implemented one or several of the commitments, the undersigned commit to support other companies in doing the same. The persistent inequities across our country underscore our urgent, national need to address and alleviate racial, ethnic and other tensions and to promote diversity within our communities. As leaders of some of America’s largest corporations, we manage thousands of employees and play a critical role in ensuring that inclusion is core to our workplace culture and that our businesses are representative of the communities we serve. Moreover, we know that diversity is good for the economy; it improves corporate performance, drives growth and enhances employee engagement. Simply put, organizations with diverse teams perform better. We recognize that diversity & inclusion are multifaceted issues and that we need to tackle these subjects holistically to better engage and support all underrepresented groups within business. To do this, we believe we also need to address honestly and head-on the concerns and needs of our diverse employees and increase equity for all, including Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Native Americans, LGBTQ, disabled, veterans and women.
    [Show full text]