JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPER

Ordinary Meeting of Council

Tuesday, 17 NOVEMBER 2015

@ 4.30pm

in the Council Chambers Our Vision:

“Junee will be a great place to live, with a healthy civic pride. That will come about because the amenity of the Shire – social, recreational, cultural, environmental and visual – is the best quality possible given our circumstances. There will be an increase in population because of this, with the increase made up of people who are net contributors to the community.

“Junee will be prosperous and existing services and businesses will have been preserved and grown. The Shire will have economic development strategies recognising the different circumstances of urban and rural areas.

“Junee will be a place where innovative, responsive leadership and management occurs in all facets of community life.

“It will be an independent Local Government area with a strong sense of identity.”

Our Mission:

The community and Junee Shire Council are to Make Tracks systematically and with determination towards the Shire Vision.”

Our Community Values:

Proud and welcoming – we are proud of our Shire and as a friendly community we encourage and support new residents and business owners.

Innovative and progressive – we welcome new ideas and we seek to make changes that will improve the lifestyle of our community.

Inclusive – we have a perspective broader than the Shire boundary; our regional focus means we are tuned to the opportunities available through co-operation and partnerships.

Leadership and wisdom – we listen and act; we are prepared to take tough decisions in the best interests of the future of our people, our place and our economy. AGENDA

APOLOGIES

PRESENTATION BY DR DREW – FIT FOR THE FUTURE

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES ORDINARY MEETING 20 OCTOBER 2015

MATTERS ARISING OUT OF MINUTES

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

MAYORAL MINUTE

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT 1[GM] FIT FOR THE FUTURE 2[ADCCS] PAYMENT OF EXPENSES AND PROVISION OF FACILITIES FOR MAYORS AND COUNCILLORS POLICY 3[AFM] REVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS TO 30 JUNE 2015 4[ADCCS] QUARTERLY BUDGET 5[ADCCS] REVOTES FROM 2014/2015 TO CURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR 6[ADCCS] THE GOVERNMENT INFORMATION (PUBLIC ACCESS) ACT 2009 7[AFM] COUNCIL INVESTMENTS AND BANK BALANCES 8[DES] DEED OF AGREEMENT FOR SOUTH-EAST WEIGHT OF LOADS GROUP MEMBERSHIP 9[ADDES] PROPOSED 21 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION – DA 2015/43 LOT 14 DP 833292 AND LOT 1 DP 391956 14 JOHN POTTS DRIVE AND 25 KITCHENER STREET JUNEE 10[ADDES] SECTION 96 AMENDMENT – DA 2012/8 LOT 14 DP 1035451 17 LOUGHAN ROAD JUNEE 11[ADDES] JUNEE RESIDENTIAL STRATEGY 2006 – DRAFT PROGRESS REPORT 12[ADDES] DRAFT EXPLORATION CODE OF PRACTICE – COMMUNITY CONSULTATION 13[ADDES] DRAFT JUNEE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN 14[ADDES] NSW DISABILITY INCLUSION ACTION PLANNING GUIDELINES

CORRESPONDENCE

COMMITTEE REPORTS

DELEGATES REPORTS

NOTICES OF MOTION NIL

LATE BUSINESS (MATTERS OF URGENCY) NIL

QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS WITH NOTICE Cr M Holmes

INFORMATION BOOKLET – TABLED FOR THE INFORMATION OF COUNCILLORS

GENERAL MANAGER’S CONFIDENTIAL REPORT – RECOMMENDATIONS OF COMMITTEE OF A WHOLE MEETING NIL

CLOSE

JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES ORDINARY MEETING

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, BELMORE STREET, JUNEE ON TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2015.

The meeting opened at 4.40pm.

PRESENT

Councillors M Austin, A Clinton, P Halliburton, M Holmes, C Randall and J Ward.

APOLOGIES

01.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr C Randall that Councillor R Callow, Councillor L Cummins and Councillor N Smith be granted a leave of absence from the 20 October 2015 Ordinary Meeting.

STAFF

General Manager, Acting Director Corporate and Community Services, Director Engineering Services, Acting Director Development and Environmental Services and Executive Assistant.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES – EXTRAORDINARY MEETING 15 SEPTEMBER 2015

02.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr M Holmes seconded Cr J Ward that the minutes of the Extraordinary Meeting held on 15 September 2015, copies of which had been supplied to each Councillor, be confirmed.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES – ORDINARY MEETING 15 SEPTEMBER 2015

03.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr C Randall seconded Cr J Ward that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 15 September 2015, copies of which had been supplied to each Councillor, be confirmed.

BUSINESS ARISING

Councillor Halliburton enquired as to the progress of the Memorial Park fence. The Director Engineering Services stated that quotes are still being sourced.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Councillors were invited to disclose any Declarations of Interest related to the items of business in the report. None were received.

MAYORAL MINUTE

1. LOCAL GOVERNMENT NSW STATE CONFERENCE – 12 & 13 OCTOBER 2015

04.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr M Holmes seconded Cr J Ward that the Mayoral Minute be adopted.

CHAIRPERSON: Page 1 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, BELMORE STREET, JUNEE ON TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2015.

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

The General Manager presented a report which dealt with Items 1 to 11, and the following action was taken:

05.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr M Austin that the Council suspend Standing Orders and bring Item 9 forward; the time being 4.44pm.

9[ADDES] DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2015/19 – STORAGE SHED AND HOBBY RAILWAY – 86-90 WARDLE STREET JUNEE –UPDATE

It was MOVED by Cr M Holmes that the application be approved on a 12 month basis.

The MOTION was withdrawn.

06.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr C Randall that:

1. Council advise the applicant, based on the additional information provided, that it considers that a report, prepared by a qualified noise consultant, identifying appropriate noise mitigation measures for the proposal, would satisfy Item 3 of Council’s request on the 23 June 2015.

2. Should the applicant proceed with the proposed on-site noise assessment, that staff considers referring any report or results from the on-site noise trials for assessment by a qualified noise consultant.

As required under Section 375A of the Local Government Act, the following is the record of voting for this planning matter.

FOR: Cr M Austin, Cr A Clinton, Cr M Holmes, Cr P Halliburton, Cr C Randall and Cr J Ward.

AGAINST: Nil

07.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr C Randall that Standing Orders be resumed the time being 5.04pm.

1[GM] PECUNIARY INTEREST RETURNS

08.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr J Ward seconded Cr M Holmes that Council receives and notes the tabling of annual disclosures of interests in written form at the Ordinary Council meeting held on the 19 October 2015.

2[GM] OFFICE OPERATIONS – CHRISTMAS NEW YEAR 2015/2016

09.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr C Randall seconded Cr J Ward that in relation to the Christmas/New Year period 2015/2016:

1. The report be noted; and

CHAIRPERSON: Page 2 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, BELMORE STREET, JUNEE ON TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2015.

2. Suitable advertisements be placed in the local press advising the community of the office arrangements for the Christmas/New Year period.

3[GM] ACTING GENERAL MANAGER

10.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr M Holmes that in accordance with s.351 of the Local Government Act 1993 - whilst the General Manager is on leave - the Director of Corporate and Community Services is appointed Acting General Manager. In instances where the Director of Corporate and Community Services is also on leave, the Director of Engineering Services is appointed Acting General Manager.

4[ADCCS] FINANCIAL REPORTS TO 30 JUNE 2015

11.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr J Ward seconded Cr A Clinton that:

1. The report be noted.

2. Council make the two Statements as included in the above report in relation to its Annual Financial Reports for the year ended 30 June 2015.

5[ADCCS] EURONGILLY DISTRICT HALL COMMITTEE - REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE WITH RATES

12.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr M Austin seconded Cr C Randall that the Council donate an amount equal to the outstanding rates and interest for the 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 financial years, to the Eurongilly District Hall Committee.

Councillor M Holmes voted against the motion and asked that this be recorded.

6[ADCCS] PAYMENT OF EXPENSES AND PROVISION OF FACILITIES FOR MAYORS AND COUNCILLORS POLICY

13.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr J Ward that the Council note the advertising for the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities for Mayors and Councillors Policy and that a report be provided back to Council with any submissions prior to formal adoption.

7[ADDCS] FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE GRANT

14.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr C Randall seconded Cr M Austin that the report be noted.

8[AFM] COUNCIL INVESTMENTS AND BANK BALANCES

15.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr J Ward that:

1. The Monthly Investment Reports as at 30 September 2015 be received and noted.

2. The Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

CHAIRPERSON: Page 3 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, BELMORE STREET, JUNEE ON TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2015.

10[ADDES] JUNEE SHIRE PUBLIC HEALTH INSPECTION PROGRAM

16.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr M Holmes seconded Cr M Austin that the report be received and noted.

11[ADDES] COMMUNITY EVENT – ALCOHOL FREE ZONE – BROADWAY, JUNEE

17.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr M Holmes seconded Cr M Austin that:

1. The Council resolve to temporarily suspend the Broadway Alcohol Free Zone restriction from 2.00pm until 9.00pm on Saturday, 28 November 2015 to enable alcohol to be consumed during the Junee Carols event.

2. A suitable notice be published in the Junee Southern Cross advising of the temporary suspension of the operation of the Alcohol Free Zone in Broadway from 2.00pm until 9.00pm on Saturday, 28 November 2015.

COMMITTEE REPORTS

1. Internal Audit Committee

18.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr J Ward held on 7 October 2015, copies of which had been supplied to each Councillor, be confirmed and adopted.

DELEGATES’ REPORTS

• Sports Committee – Cr M Holmes • Goldenfields Water County Council – Cr A Clinton - verbal • NSW Rural Bushfire Service – Cr C Randall - verbal

NOTICE OF MOTION

Nil

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Nil

LATE BUSINESS

19.10.15 RESOLVED on the motion of Cr A Clinton seconded Cr M Austin that the General Manager write to the Minister of Local Government, other Members of Parliament and the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) expressing in the strongest terms, the Council’s disappointment in the IPART report findings on Junee Shire Council noting that:

• IPART did not consider Junee’s positive growth rate, • The only criteria not met was scale and capacity, • IPART did recognise that Junee Shire Council is financially viable, • IPART had not considered the local community’s views that residents do not want to merge,

CHAIRPERSON: Page 4 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, BELMORE STREET, JUNEE ON TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2015.

• Junee Shire Council is a member of a Pilot Joint Organisation. • IPART fail to recognise the Local Government Review Panels recommendations for Junee were …”a potential merger with Cootamundra Shire Council or become a member of a Joint Organisation”, and that the Junee Shire Council fully endorses that recommendation to be a member of a Joint Organisation that would promote and provide the scale and capacity for the region.

INFORMATION BOOKLET

The information booklet was received and noted.

There being no further business, the meeting closed at 5.46pm.

CHAIRPERSON: Page 5 of 5

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 1 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

1[GM] FIT FOR THE FUTURE

This is an initial report to provide some background to events that have been unfolding in recent weeks regarding Fit for the Future reforms. A more substantial report will be presented at the council meeting.

On 20 October 2015 the NSW Government released the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) Assessment of Council - Fit for the Future Proposals Report.

IPART received 139 proposals of which 52 were found to be “fit” under the Fit for the Future criteria established by the Government last year. These included four merger proposals (covering nine councils) and 48 proposals from councils proposing to stand alone.

IPART found that two-thirds of NSW councils were not fit for the future. Junee was assessed as being “not fit” for the future as a stand-alone council.

While Junee met IPART’s seven key ratios across the areas of:

• Financial Sustainability • Efficiency • Effectively manages infrastructure and delivers services for communities, with 100% satisfaction, in did not, like so many other councils, meet the singular criterion of Scale and Capacity.

Council held a community meeting on the 2 November 2015 to provide the new information to local residents. In excess of 400 people attended the meeting.

The community should ultimately determine what they believe Junee shire's future should be - after being fully informed of all the facts as they currently stand.

After considering the State Government’s incentive package for voluntary amalgamations and questions from residents to assist whether there was an appetite for amalgamating with one of our neighbouring councils, or not, a Community motion was moved from the floor, debated and carried overwhelmingly.

Community Motion

1. The Junee Community is resolutely committed to retaining Junee Shire Council in its current form. The Junee Community call upon the State Government not to undertake a forced council amalgamation for our Shire.

2. Junee Shire Council plays a vital role within our Community. The Community highly values the role it plays in facilitating community pride and spirit, economic development and local jobs.

3. This Community has exceptional medical, library, parks, gardens and sporting facilities already. They have been fashioned as a direct result of community and council leadership. No forced amalgamations will improve these facilities; in fact we believe they will be compromised should amalgamation occur.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 2

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

4. That Junee Shire Council continue to work with the State Government, REROC and potentially the Joint Organisation to ensure that local government reform continues, creating efficiencies and productivity in the systems of government.

5. That Junee Shire Council lawfully do everything in its power to ensure Wagga Wagga City Council never amalgamate with Junee Shire Council.

The State Government have provided a 30 day window in which to submit a further proposal regarding any change of heart councils may have regarding voluntary amalgamation preferences.

The Mayor, Deputy Mayor and myself will attend a meeting with the Minister of Local Government the Hon. Paul Toole on Monday. The purpose of the meeting is to convey the local community’s position and seek endorsement that forced amalgamations are not part of the State Government’s future plans.

The results of that meeting with a more detailed report will be distributed at the council meeting on Tuesday.

In the interim a letter from the Premier supporting the outcomes from the IPART report are attached.

Timetable to date

The origins of the reforming process commenced at Dubbo in 2011 when all NSW councils met to plan how local government could meet the challenges for the future.

After the Dubbo meeting, the State Government commenced a program of reform, including:

• 2013 April TCorp Sustainability Review of each NSW council (completed) • 2013 June Local Government Infrastructure Audit (completed) • 2013 October Local Government Acts Task Force (completed) • 2013 October Independent Local Government Review panel (completed)

The State Government's response to these items was released in September 2014 under the banner - Fit for the Future - Local Government.

The State Government appointed IPART in April 2015 to assess NSW councils' fitness against a threshold criteria of Scale and Capability plus seven key benchmark ratios across the three areas of:

1. Financial Sustainability 2. Efficiency 3. Effectively manages infrastructure and delivers services for communities

IPART released their Methodology for the Assessment of Council Fit for the Future Proposal on 1 June 2015 and provided NSW councils with 30 days to lodge a submission. IPART's role was to assess councils as Fit or Not Fit for the future.

IPART's final report was released on 20 October 2015.

Junee Shire Council, along with 58 rural and regional council, were declared ‘not fit’ by IPART.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 3

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

The State Government, on the same day, announced that it would provide an additional 30 days for councils to reconsider voluntary amalgamations with neighbouring councils.

The State Government also announced that IPART's role had finished and that the Department of Premier Cabinet would assess future submissions by NSW councils with a closing date of 18 November 2015.

The NSW Parliament Legislative Assembly conducted an enquiry during 2015 into NSW Government's Fit for the Future reform program for local government and released their report on 29 October 2015. The Standing Committee held a hearing in Sydney, Cobar and Wagga Wagga. The enquiry’s recommendations were highly critical of the Government’s Fit for the Future reform process.

Recommendation:

That the report be noted.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 4

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

2[ADCCS] PAYMENT OF EXPENSES AND PROVISION OF FACILITIES FOR MAYORS AND COUNCILLORS POLICY

Councillors are referred to the report on the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities for Mayors and Councillors Policy that was presented to the October 2015 Ordinary Meeting. As outlined in that report, this policy is to be adopted by Council each year by 30 November – after 28 days public consultation - even if there have been no changes to the policy. It is then to submit its Policy to the Division of Local Government, Department of Premier and Cabinet.

No public submissions or any form of contact from the public was made about this Policy after it was advertised as being available for comment. The policy also is available on Council's website.

Recommendation:

That the Council re-adopt the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities for Mayors and Councillors Policy as advertised.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 5

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

3[AFM] REVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS TO 30 JUNE 2015

The Annual Financial Reports to 30 June 2015 have been audited. The core financial reports; Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Statement of Changes in Equity and Statement of Cash Flows are attached to this report. Also attached are copies of Note 6- cash Position, note 13- Performance Measures and Note 28- Financial Review over last five years. An extension of time to remit the audited Financial Reports was approved by the Director General of the Office of Local Government to the 16 November 2015. The audited Financial Reports were supplied to the Office of Local Government on the 13 November 2015. The public exhibition and presentation of the report will therefore occur at the December council meeting. The following section of this report highlights the main features of the audited financial result at 30 June 2015.

Income Statement

Annual Financial Results 2015 2014 Net Operating Result before Grants and contributions $12,000 surplus $1,571,000 deficit

The Income Statement shows a Net Operating Result before Grants & Contributions provided for Capital Purposes of a $12,000 surplus. This is an improvement on the budgeted estimate of a $131,000 deficit and a significant improvement on the 2013-2014 result of a $1,571,000 deficit. As always there are a number of variations to the budgeted result and the principal variations will be reported to the December 2015 meeting when the audited Financial Reports are formally presented.

Annual Financial Results 2015 2014 Net Operating Result from Continuing Operations $574,000 surplus $440,000 deficit

The Operating Result from Continuing Operations is a $574,000 surplus. This result includes Capital Grants & Contributions. It is a better result than the original budget estimate of $105,000 deficit and again a significant improvement on the 2013-2014 result of a $440,000 deficit.

In 2013-14 this result was affected by the cessation of the advance payment of the Financial Assistance Grant. (This was a one-off adjustment that affected only the 2013-2014 Operating Result).

This item impacts on a range of other results, balances and ratios as well as the operating result.

Balance Sheet

Annual Financial Results 2015 2014 Cash and Investments $2,335,000 $2,050,000

Overall levels of Cash and Investments have increased on the previous year's levels. The total of Cash and Cash Equivalents as at 30 June 2015 is $2,335,000 compared to $2,050,000 at 30 June 2014. Councillors should note that Restricted Asset amounts form much of these totals and again some of the Internally Restricted Assets are funded by Receivables at year end.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 6

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Annual Financial Results 2015 2014 Total Equity $132,078,000 $130,681,000

The Equity of the Council has increased with increases in Cash and Cash Equivalents and other assets offsetting increases in Liabilities (mainly loan funding).

Statement of Cash Flows

In 2014-2015 there was a net increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents of $285,000.

The audited financial statements will be advertised seeking public comment in accordance with statutory requirements. A more detailed analysis and interpretation of the key results will be presented to Council at the December 2015 meeting where Council’s auditor will make a presentation. At this meeting a complete set of General Purpose Financial Reports, Special Purpose Financial Reports and Special Schedules will be attached to the business paper.

Recommendation:

That the report be noted.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 7

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

4[ADCCS] QUARTERLY BUDGET REVIEW STATEMENT - AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2015

The Quarterly Budget Review Statement provides a summary of council’s financial position at the end of each quarter. It does this from a number of different financial perspectives. It is the mechanism whereby councillors and the community are informed of council’s progress against the Operational Plan (original budget) and the last revised budget along with recommended changes and reasons for major variances.

Attached to this report are the following items that represent the Quarterly Budget Review Statement for Junee Shire Council as at 30 September 2015:

• Income & Expenses Statement in the following formats:

- By type and showing the consolidated results for General Fund, Waste Management Fund and Sewerage Fund

- By Department and Service Area – which aligns with the Operational Plan;

• Cash and Investments Statement;

• Capital Expenditure Budget Statement in the following formats

- By type and showing the consolidated results for General Fund, Waste Management Fund and Sewerage Fund and showing Capital Funding:

- By Department and Service Area – which aligns with the Operational Plan;

• Contracts Statement showing any new contractual arrangements taken out over the preceding three months;

• Consultancies and Legal Expenses Statement shown for consultancies and legal expenses for the year to date;

• Financial Key Performance Indicators - Operating Surplus Ratio, Rates and Annual Charges Coverage Ratio and Current Ratio; and

• A Detailed Budget Report showing all of Council’s budget by Department and Service Area – which aligns with the Operational Plan. This Report is the one that best shows where variations have been made in the September 2015 quarterly review and that now need Council approval.

This quarterly review reflects updated information received on Grants, other revenues or expenses over the three months to September 2015 as well as any appropriate revotes and additional commitments by Council.

1. Variations that affect the projected 2015/2016 budget surplus.

These include: a) Reduction in Financial Assistance of $18,884. This was reported to Council in October 2015.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 8

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015. b) Allocation of $10,000 to the Liveable Communities Project. Resolution by Council at meeting of 23 June 2015. c) Bike Path Grant $18,700. The 2015/16 Bike Path Grant received requires 50:50 funding. Total expenditure is $37,400 with Council responsible for half. d) Creation of an internally restricted reserve for capital works at Junee Junction Recreation and Aquatic Centre of $97,575. ($70,368 adjustment to budget) Resolution by Council at meeting of 18 August 2015. e) Additional funds for corporate software enhancement of $25,000. Resolution by Council at meeting of 15 September 2015. f) Burns Park Light Replacement $7500. Following a routine inspection, it was found that the luminaires on the most easterly light towers at Burns Park had failed. Due to the period of time that had elapsed since their failure, the switching gear that operated the luminaires had also failed.

Without sufficient light, participants training and competing cannot safely use field 2. This places an additional burden on and leads to the premature deterioration of field 1 which simply cannot withstand the use that would otherwise be proportioned over the two fields. g) Administration Building –External painting $25,000. Funded in 2014/2015 but not spent. Needs to be recommitted in 2015/16. h) Council House – 3 Pike Place $10,000. Amount required to prepare house for sale. i) Willow Park Cottage $25,000. Major renovation prior to new tenants occupying. j) Waste Recycling Bins, Additional bins not required for 2015/2016. $10,000 savings. k) Memorial Park Playground $7,000. It was resolved at the August 2015 General Meeting of Junee Shire Council to install a new fence around the Memorial Park playground. Following further investigations since the resolution was adopted, it has become apparent that undertaking a number of small capital projects prior to the installation of the fence would yield a better value for money proposition than attempting to complete these works following the installation of the fence.

These works include:

• A new shade cover over the playground, • Raising of the shade structure to a height that is beyond the reach of the public, and • A small stormwater line to drain the south-eastern corner of the playground softfall and the area immediately around the public barbecue, both of which suffer through ponding water and slippery surfaces following either rain or irrigation.

These works will be completed prior to the installation of the fence.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 9

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

2. Variations that don’t affect the projected budget surplus.

These include: a) Liveable Communities Grant $67,500. Funded from unexpended grants. b) Other Council Projects of $28,000. Resolution by Council at meeting of 23 June 2015. Transfer from Restricted Assets. c) Junee Aussie Hoops Program $6,307. Funded from unexpended grants. d) Library Grant $10,955. Unspent 2014/2015. e) Electronic Housing Code Program $20,145. Funded from unexpended Grants f) Regional Road 243 Canola Way/Gundagai Road $62,094. Funded from unexpended grants. g) Sewerage Treatment Plan SCADA and PLC Upgrade $50,000. Funded from Reserve. h) Sewage Treatment Plant – Bank repairs Ponds 2 and 3 $112,696. Funded from Reserve. i) Road Funding. Adjustments have been made to reflect the additional Roads to Recovery allocation that the Council will receive in 2015/16 following the Federal Government’s successful reintroduction of the fuel excise levy.

• Urban Sealed and Unsealed Roads $92,668 • Rural Sealed Roads $263,572.

A small adjustment has also been made to the Council’s Block Grant allocation to reflect the actual allocation received. j) Sewage – Additional work. An additional $130k approx. above the original budget was required when upon commencement, it was discovered that there were two unforseen issues that required rectification.

The first was that the bank between pond 1 and 2 had originally been assessed as only requiring reshaping to eliminate previous erosion. Upon draining pond 2, it was determined that a substantial part of the bank leaked and required a more significant replacement effort.

The second, also on pond 2, was the discovery of approximately 10,000m³ of unsuitable material in the floor of the pond. This material was allowing groundwater to enter the pond and conversely during normal operation it would be expected that under hydrostatic load, effluent would enter the groundwater. This unsuitable material was removed and replaced with a suitable clay fill to properly line the floor, creating a barrier for the purpose of keeping effluent and ground water separate.

To lessen the impact of this variation, a number of small cuts to other parts of the capital budget for the sewerage network have been made. Reserve funds are available to undertake this remediation.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 10

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL – QUARTERLY BUDGET REVIEW STATEMENT

The following statement is made in accordance with Clause 203(2) of the Local Government (General) Regulations 2005.

It is my opinion that the Quarterly Budget Review Statement for Junee Shire Council for the quarter ended 30/09/2015 indicates that Council’s projected financial position at 30 June 2016 will be satisfactory at year end, having regard to the projected estimates of income and expenditure and the original budgeted income and expenditure. This is in terms of the operating result before capital amounts.

In cash terms the Council’s result at 30 June 2016 will be satisfactory having regard to the projected estimates of income and expenditure and the original budgeted income and expenditure.

Actions required to achieve a satisfactory result:

The projected budget result in the Income & Expenses Statement shows an improved budget position of $172,370 with a projected surplus of $614,358

The Council has successfully applied to raise additional general income through Special Rate Variations over the next three years. This will reduce and eliminate the operating deficit in future years.

Signed: date: 17 November 2015

Name: Peter White

Responsible: Acting Accounting Officer, Junee Shire Council

Recommendations:

1. That the Quarterly Budget Review Report at 30 September 2015 be received and noted; and

2. That the Council approve the variations in budgets at 30 September 2015.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 11

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

5[ADCCS] REVOTES FROM 2014/2015 TO CURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR

At the end of each financial year the Council typically has some uncompleted works. Loans, grants, contributions or reserves fund form some of these revoted works. The balance is funded from Council’s Accumulated Funds.

Revotes from 2014/2015 to the current financial year are outlined below. The nett amount from Accumulated Funds is $140,868. These revotes are included in the Quarterly Budget Review Statement for 30 September 2015 report.

Item Revote Total $ Source of Funds $ Unexpended Restricted Job No. Grant Asset Councillor Projects 28,000 28,000 20050 Office of Communities - Sport & 6,307 6,307 26901 Recreation - Junee Aussie Hoops Dept Environment & Planning – 20,145 20,145 25426 Electronic Housing Code Liveable Communities Grant 67,500 67,500 Broadway Museum 10,500 10,500 26708 Sewage Treatment Plan – SCADA & PLC 50,000 50,000 92222 Upgrade Sewage Treatment Plant – Bank repairs 112,696 112,696 92226 Ponds 2 & 3 Regional Road 243 Canola 62,094 62,094 28370 Way/Gundagai Road – Maintenance TOTALS 357,242 156,046 201,196

Recommendation:

That the Council approve the Revotes to the 2015/2016 Financial Year as presented in this report.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 12

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

6[ADCCS] THE GOVERNMENT INFORMATION (PUBLIC ACCESS) ACT 2009

Introduction

From the 1 July 2010, the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 has provided the main mechanism through which the public can apply to access Council-held documents, where those documents are not already made publicly available.

Agency Information Guide – formerly called the Publication Guide

Under GIPA, Junee Shire Council is required to publish an Agency Information Guide on its website. This was formerly known as the Publication Guide. This guide has been reviewed and minor amendments and updates made. The revised guide is attached to this report.

It sets out in general terms:

• what our structure and functions are;

• what kind of government information we have;

• what kind of government information we will make available to the public;

• how that information will be made available; and

• whether or not there is a charge to access specific kinds of information.

Recommendations:

1. That the report be noted.

2. That the revised Agency Information Guide be adopted by the Council.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 13

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

AGENCY INFORMATION GUIDE

JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

1. Structure and Functions of Council

1.1 Description

The Local Government Area of Junee Shire is a part of the Riverina region in the state of New South Wales. It is situated midway between Sydney and Melbourne. It covers 2,031 sq km, and is made up of the township of Junee and the villages of Old Junee, Wantabadgery, Illabo, Bethungra and surrounding farmland.

1.2 Basis of Constitution

Junee Shire Council is a statutory body incorporated under the Local Government Act 1993.

1.3 Organisational Structure and Resources

Junee Shire Council is headed by a publicly elected Council that is responsible for providing leadership and vision for the Shire.

Junee Shire Council is an undivided area, governed by the body of nine Councillors who are elected by the residents and ratepayers every four years to represent the community.

The Councillors are responsible for making the major decisions and policies which guide Council's operations. The roles of the Councillors, as members of the body corporate are:

• to direct and control the affairs of the Council in accordance with the Local Government Act and other applicable legislation;

• to participate in the optimum allocation of the Council's resources for the benefit of the area;

• to play a key role in the creation and review of the Council's policies, objectives and criteria relating to the exercise of the Council's regulatory functions;

• to review the performance of the Council and its delivery of services, management plans and revenue policies of the Council;

The role of a Councillor is, as an elected person:

• to represent the interests of the residents and ratepayers;

• to provide leadership and guidance to the community;

• to facilitate communication between the community and the Council.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 14

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Council is headed by the Mayor who is elected each year by the Councillors from among their number. The Mayor acts as the Chairperson of Council meetings, carries out the civic and ceremonial functions of the office, exercises, in cases of necessity, the decision making functions of the body politic between its meetings and performs any other functions that the Council determines.

The Principal Officer of the Council is the General Manager. The General Manager is responsible for the efficient operation of Council's organisation and for ensuring the implementation of Council decisions. The General Manager is also responsible for the day to day management of the Council, the exercise of any functions delegated by Council, the appointment, direction and where necessary, the dismissal of staff.

The Executive Services Department headed by the General Manager is responsible for Governance, Councillor Support, Fire Control and Emergency Services, Marketing and Economic Development.

To assist the General Manager in the exercise of these functions, there are three Directorates of Council, each headed by a Director. These are:

• Corporate & Community Services

The Director of Corporate & Community Services is responsible for Finance, IT, Human Resources, Customer Service, Corporate Support, Information Management, Family Day Care, Community Transport, Library, Recreation Centre and Caravan Park.

• Engineering Services

The Director of Engineering is responsible for Infrastructure Service Planning, Roads, Drains & Stormwater Management, Bridges, Sewerage, Cemeteries, Public Conveniences, Sporting Grounds, Parks & Gardens, Property Development and Private Works, Noxious Plant Control, Animal Control, Regulatory Services.

• Development & Environmental Services

The Director of Development & Environmental Services is responsible for Building Control, Public Health, Food Control, , Community Development, Council Houses, Town Planning, Environmental Protection, Waste Management, Public Halls and other Council buildings.

Each division is charged with the responsibility of implementing policies and programs to achieve the Shire's vision. An Organisational Chart is set out on the following page to assist in explaining Council's structure.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 15

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 16 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

1.4 Council Functions

The principles that guide Council in carrying out of its functions is detailed in the Local Government Act, 1993:

Service functions:

• Providing community health, development, recreation, education and information services • Environmental Protection • Waste Removal and Disposal • Land & Property, Industry & Tourism Development & Assistance • Civil Infrastructure Planning • Civil Infrastructure Maintenance & Construction • Wastewater & Stormwater services • Cemeteries

Regulatory functions:

• Building & development approval and control • Building certificates • Development of Codes & policies • Leases and licences of public reserves • Land management

Ancillary functions:

• Resumption of land • Powers of entry and inspection • Power to sell land for overdue rates • Power to order demolition of unsafe or unapproved structures Revenue functions:

• Rates • Fees • Charges • Investments • Borrowings

Administrative functions:

• Employment of staff • Management Plans • Financial reporting • Annual reports • Codes of conduct and practice • Policy preparation • Governance • Information Management

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 17

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Enforcement functions:

• Proceedings for breaches of the Local Government Act & Regulations, and other Acts and Regulations • Prosecution of offences • Recovery of rates and charges

As well as the Local Government Act, Council has functions under a number of other related Acts including:

• Anti-Discrimination Act, 1977 • Cemeteries & Crematoria Act, 2013 • Community Land Development Act, 1989 • Companion Animals Act, 1998 • Contaminated Land Management Act, 1997 • Conveyancing Act, 1919 • Copyright Act, 1968 • Crown Lands Act, 1989 • Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979 Environmental Protection Act, 1979 • Financial Sector Reform (NSW) Act, 1999 • Fire Brigades Act, 1989 • Food Act, 2003 • Government Information (Public Access) Act, 2009 • Heritage Act, 1977 • Health Records and Information Privacy Act, 2002 • Impounding Act, 1993 • Interpretation Act, 1987 • Land Acquisitions Just Terms Compensation Act, 1991 • Land Development Contribution Management Act, 1970 • Library Act, 1939 • Local Government Act, 1993 • Major Events Act, 2009 • Noxious Weeds Act, 1993 • Privacy & Personal Information Protection Act, 1998 • Protection of the Environment Operations Act, 1997 • Public Health Act, 2010 • Public Interest Disclosures Act, 1994 • Real Property Act, 1900 • Recreation Vehicles Act, 1983 • Roads Act, 1993 • Road Transport Act, 2013 • State Emergency Services and Rescues Management Act, 1989 State Emergency Service Act, 1989 • State Records Act, 1998 • Strata Titles Act, 1973

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 18 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

• Swimming Pools Act, 1992 • Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 • Unclaimed Money Act, 1995 • Valuation of Land Act, 1916 • Waste Avoidance & Resource Recovery Act, 2001 • Work Health & Safety Act, 2011

2. HOW COUNCIL FUNCTIONS AFFECT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC

The majority of the activities and functions of Council have an impact on the public, either directly or indirectly. These include: maintaining and building local infrastructure, overseeing and supporting local services, working with State and Federal Governments, organisations, businesses and community groups, raising funds for local purposes by the fair imposition of rates, charges and fees and managing, developing and protecting the environment of the area for which it is responsible.

The following is an outline of how the broad functions of Council affect the public:

Service functions affect members of the public as Council provides services and facilities to the public. These include provision of human services such as family day care and libraries, infrastructure and the removal of garbage, recreation facilities and halls.

Regulatory functions place restrictions on developments and buildings to ensure that they meet certain requirements affecting the amenity of the community and not endanger the lives and safety of any person. Members of the public must be aware of, and comply with, such regulations.

Ancillary functions affect only some members of the public. These functions include, for example, the resumption of land or the power for Council to enter onto a person's land. In these circumstances, only the owner of the property would be affected.

Revenue functions affect the public directly in that revenue from rates and other charges paid by the public that is used to fund services and facilities provided to the community.

Administrative functions do not necessarily affect the public directly but have an indirect impact on the community through the efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided.

Enforcement functions only affect those members of the public who are in breach of certain legislation. This includes matters such as the non-payment of rates and charges, unregistered dogs and parking offences. Community planning and development functions affect areas such as cultural development, social planning and community profile and involves:

• Advocating and planning for the needs of our community. This includes initiating partnerships, participating on regional, State of Commonwealth working parties, and preparation and implementation of the Community Plan.

• Providing support to community and organisations through provision of grants, training and information. J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 19 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

• Facilitation opportunities for people to participate in the life of the community through the conduct of a range of Council organised events as well as promoting events of others.

Council encourages and provides its community with opportunities to comment and supply input into the decision making process to ensure maximum customer satisfaction.

3. HOW THE PUBLIC CAN PARTICIPATE IN COUNCIL'S POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND THE EXERCISE OF FUNCTIONS

There are two main ways in which members of the public may participate in the policy development and, indeed, the general activities of the Council. These are through representation and personal participation.

3.1 Representation

Local Government in Australia is based on the principles of representative democracy. This means that people elect representatives to their local Council to make decisions on their behalf. In New South Wales, local government elections are held every four years. The next elections are to be held in September 2016.

At each election, voters elect nine Councillors for a four year term. All residents of the area who are on the electoral roll are eligible to vote. Voting is compulsory.

Residents are able to raise issues with, and make representations to the elected Councillors. The Councillors may pursue the matter on the residents’ behalf accordingly allowing members of the public to influence the development of policy. 3.1 Personal Participation

Members of the public are able to attend Council meetings held at Junee Shire Council, Cnr Stewart & Belmore Streets, Junee on the third Tuesday of each month commencing at 4.30pm. Residents and interested parties are welcome to attend and address Council meetings on items listed on the Committee Agendas with the prior arrangement and consent of the Mayor or the General Manager.

Members of the public may be involved in Council Committees. Council has a number of User Group Committees comprising stakeholders and staff from respective areas.

3.3 Our Community Values

Proud and welcoming – we are proud of our shire and as a friendly community we encourage and support new residents and business owners.

Innovative and progressive – we welcome new ideas and we seek to make changes that will improve the lifestyle of our community.

Inclusive – we have a perspective broader than the shire boundary; our regional focus means we are tuned to the opportunities available through co-operation and partnerships.

Leadership and wisdom – we listen and act; we are prepared to take tough decisions in the best interests of the future of our people, our place and our economy.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 20 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

4. HOW TO ACCESS OUR INFORMATION

4.1 Information Held by Council

Council holds a wide range of information, in both hard copy and electronic form in respect of the number of functions undertaken by it. That information is contained in:

• Files - either physical or electronic • Policy Documents • General Documents

Documents listed in the “General Documents” in this guide may be made available to the public on request unless there is an overriding public interest not to do so.

4.2 Files - Electronic and Physical

Council information is kept and maintained in both electronic format and in a paper based format. The Council commenced retaining electronic records in a systematic way on 1 July 2010.

4.3 Policy Documents

Council's policies are listed in a policy register and can be accessed at Council website.

4.4 General Documents

The following list of general documents held by Council has been divided into four sections as prescribed in accordance with Government Information (Public Access) Regulation 2009:

1. Information about Council

2. Plans & Policies

3. Information about Development Applications & any associated documents received in relation to a proposed development

4. Approvals, Orders & Other Documents

The Regulations (Government Information (Public Access) Regulation 2009) made under the Government Information (Public Access) Act requires that these documents held by Council, are to be made publicly available for inspection, free of charge. The public is entitled to inspect these documents either on Council's website (unless there is an unreasonable additional cost to Council to publish these documents on the website) or at the offices of the Council during ordinary office hours or at any other place as determined by the Council. Any current or previous documents of this type may be inspected by the public free of charge. Copies can be supplied for reasonable copying charges.

These documents are:

1. Information about Council

• The Model Code prescribed under section 440 (1) of the Local Government Act • Councils adopted Code of Conduct

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 21 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

• Code of Meeting Practice • Annual Report • Annual Financial Reports • Auditor’s Report • Community Strategic Plan, Resourcing Strategy, Delivery Program and Operational Plan • EEO Management Plan • Policy concerning the Payment of Expenses Incurred by, and the Provision of Facilities to, Councillors • Annual Reports of Bodies Exercising Functions Delegated by Council • Any Codes referred to in the LGA • Returns of the Interests of Councillors, Designated Persons and Delegates • Agendas and Business Papers for any meeting of Council or any Committee of Council (excluding reports and correspondence considered in a Council Meeting closed to the public, in accordance with Section 10 and 11of the Local Government Act 1993.) • Minutes of any meeting of Council or any Committee of Council • Departmental Representative Reports presented at a meeting of Council • Land Register • Register of Investments • Register of Delegations • Register of current Declarations of Disclosures of Political donations • Register of Voting on Planning Matters

2. Plans and Policies

• Local Policies adopted by Council concerning approvals and orders • Plans of Management for Community Land • Environmental Planning Instruments, Development Control Plans and Contribution Plans

3. Information about Development Applications and Planning Matters

Development Applications and any associated documents received in relation to a proposed development:

• Home Warranty Insurance documents • Construction Certificates • Occupation Certificates • Structural Certification Documents • Statutory Planner Reports • Submissions received on Development Applications and Planning Matters • Heritage Consultant Reports • Tree Inspections Consultant Reports • Acoustic Consultant Reports • Land Contamination Consultant Reports • Records of decisions on Development Applications including decisions on appeals • Records describing general nature of documents that Council decides to exclude from public view including internal specifications and configurations, and commercially sensitive information.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 22 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

4. Approvals, Orders and Other Documents

• Applications for approvals under Part 1 of Chapter 7 of the LGA • Applications for approvals under any other Act and any associated documents received • Records of approvals granted or refused, any variation from Council Policies with reasons for the variation, and decisions made on appeals concerning approvals • Orders given under Part 2 of Chapter 7 of the LGA, and any reasons given under section 136 of the LGA • Orders given under the Authority of any other Act • Records of Building Certificates under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 • Plans of land proposed to be compulsorily acquired by Council • Compulsory Acquisition Notices • Leases and Licenses for use of Public Land classified as Community Land

5. HOW MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ACCESS AND AMEND COUNCIL DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THEIR PERSONAL AFFAIRS

Under the Government Information Public Access Act (GIPA) 2009 there is a presumption in favour of the disclosure of Council information unless there is an overriding public interest against disclosure. The GIPA Act establishes four ways to access information:

• Open Access • Proactive Access • Informal Access • Formal Access

OPEN RELEASE OF COUNCIL INFORMATION

The Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 requires Council to make certain information publicly available. This information is called ‘open access information’ or ‘mandatory release information’. These documents are listed above in 4.4 General Documents.

Council information can be accessed at: www.junee.nsw.gov.au

The information that is not published on the website, can be inspected at and obtained from Council's office during working hours of 9.00 am and 5.00 pm, Monday to Friday (except public holidays). Please contact our Customer Service section on 02 6924 8100 if you need more information. If you experience any difficulty in obtaining documents or information, you should contact the Public Officer.

PROACTIVE RELEASE OF COUNCIL INFORMATION

Council is authorised to make any information held publicly available unless there is an overriding public interest against disclosure of the information. At intervals of 12 months, we will review the program for the release of information under this section to identify the kinds of information we hold that should in the public interest be made publicly available and that can be released without imposing unreasonable additional costs on Council.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 23 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

INFORMAL RELEASE OF COUNCIL INFORMATION

Council is authorised to release information held by it to a person in response to an informal request by the person (that is, a request that is not a formal access application) unless there is an overriding public interest against disclosure of the information.

Applicants can request informal release of information by writing to the General Manager or by filling out an informal access application and lodging it at our office. There is no application fee for an informal request for information.

FORMAL RELEASE OF COUNCIL INFORMATION

Anyone who makes a formal access application for Council's information has a legally enforceable right to be provided with access to the information in accordance with GIPA Act Part 4 (Access applications) unless there is an overriding public interest against disclosure of the information.

To make a formal access application you must fill out the Formal Access to Council's Information application form or write to the General Manager and forward a $30 application fee to Council's office.

For more information about Access to Council's Information, please contact our Public Officer.

5.1 Public Officer / Right to Information Officer

The Council's Director of Corporate and Community Services has been appointed as its Public Officer.

Amongst other duties, the Public Officer may deal with requests from the public concerning the Council's affairs and has the responsibility of assisting people to gain access to public documents of the Council. The Public Officer is also Council's Right to Information Officer and, as such, is responsible for determining applications for access to documents or for the amendment of records.

If you have any difficulty in obtaining access to Council documents, you may wish to refer your enquiry to the Public Officer.

Also, if you would like to amend a document of Council which you feel is incorrect it is necessary for you to make written application to the Public Officer in the first instance.

Enquiries should be addressed as follows:

Email: [email protected] Mail: PO Box 93, JUNEE NSW 2663 Telephone: 02 6924 8100 Fax: 02 6924 2497 Visit: cnr Stewart & Belmore Streets, Junee.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 24 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

5.2 Office of the Information Commissioner

If you require any other advice or assistance about access to information you may contact the Office of the Information Commissioner by the following means:

Telephone: 1800 463 626 (free call)

Email: [email protected]

Postal Address: GPO Box 7011, SYDNEY NSW 2001

6.0 Adoption by Junee Shire Council

First adopted on 16 December 2010 – Refer Minute No. 05.12.10

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 25 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

7[AFM] COUNCIL INVESTMENTS AND BANK BALANCES

It is required under Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 to provide the Council with a written report monthly setting out details of all money that the Council has invested. On the following page of this business paper is a Monthly Investment Report as at 31 October 2015.

Certification – Responsible Accounting Officer

I, Peter White, hereby certify that the investments listed in this report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council's Investment Policy.

Recommendations:

1. That the Monthly Investment Reports as at 31 October 2015 be received and noted.

2. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 26 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Monthly Investment Report as at 31 October 2015

a) Council's Investments as at 31 October 2015

Inception Term Maturity Interest Benchmark Percentage Investment Date (Days) Date Rate Performance Benchmark Rate of Portfolio Principal Value Market Value Term Deposit NAB 7-Oct-15 92 5-Jan-16 2.88% BBSW - 90 Day Av 2.15% 13.70% 500,000.00 500,000.00

NAB 15-Aug-15 90 3-Nov-15 2.83% BBSW - 90 Day Av 2.15% 8.21% 300,000.00 300,000.00 NAB 19-Aug-15 90 17-Nov-15 2.83% BBSW - 90 Day Av 2.15% 27.40% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

ME Bank 15-Sep-15 91 15-Dec-15 2.75% BBSW - 90 Day Av 2.15% 13.70% 500,000.00 500,000.00 AMP Bank 28-Sep-15 182 28-Mar-16 2.80% BBSW - 90 Day Av 2.15% 13.70% 500,000.00 500,000.00 Total Term Deposits 90.41% $2,800,000.00 $2,800,000.00

AMP On Call 2.55% 9.59% 350,000.00 350.000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100.00% $3,150,000.00 $3,150,000.00

Cash at Bank $207,071.32

TOTAL FUNDS $3,357,071.32

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 27 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

b) Application of Investment Funds

Restricted Funds Description Value Externally Restricted Unspent Loans $0.00 Sewerage Fund $2,000,718.64 Domestic Waste Management $121,410.23 Unspent Grants $256,504.55 Reserves Trust $19,444.44 Section 94A Contributions $0.00 Trust Fund $31,966.55 $2,430,044.41

Internally Restricted ELE Reserve $205,000.00

Gravel Pit Restoration $26,847.97 Community Transport - Vehicle Replacement $131,760.26 Illabo Cenotaph Project $10,000.00 Laurie Daley Oval facilities $5,000.00 Bowen Monument

Wantabadgery $8,000.00 Cooinda Court Sprinklers $5,000.00

Junee Historical Society - Sale of Old Museum Site $30,717.21

$422,325.44

Unrestricted Funds $504,701.47

TOTAL FUNDS $3,357,071.32

* Externally & Internally Restricted Reserve figures are subject to final adjustment and external audit at 30 June each year. Figures shown above are estimate only.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 28 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

8[DES] DEED OF AGREEMENT FOR SOUTH-EAST WEIGHT OF LOADS GROUP MEMBERSHIP

Background

The South-east Weights of Loads Group (SEWOL) provides weights and measures services to 11 member councils – City of Queanbeyan, Cootamundra Shire, Yass Valley Shire, Palerang Shire, Cooma-Monaro Shire, Snowy River Shire, Harden Shire, Junee Shire, City of Shoalhaven, Wollondilly Shire and Goulbourn-Mulwaree Shire – and has its administrative centre hosted by Queanbeyan City Council. This Weights of Loads Group has been operating now for almost 20 years.

The SEWOL Deed of Agreement expires 1 December 2015, having operated for four years. In the four years to June 2015, Inspectors have intercepted 916 vehicles, detecting 18 breaches with those breaches ranging from over-mass to restricted access vehicles being off-route. On average, Inspectors spend 29 days per year in the Junee LGA undertaking enforcement operations.

Discussion

Weights of Loads Groups (WoLGs) were previously established to provide weight of loads enforcement services for road authorities (councils) across NSW; the WoLGs generally operate under the National Heavy Vehicle Law Act 2012. The NSW Roads and Maritime Service supports the establishment of these groups and there are currently five operating across the state. In respect of SEWOL, the Roads and Maritime contributes approximately $180,000 per annum.

The SEWOL group provides an affordable option for the enforcement of heavy vehicles; a function particularly important in preserving the Council’s most significant infrastructure asset: roads. It costs the Council approximately $687 per day for the services rendered; it simply would not be possible to achieve this value for money without being part of a WoLG.

It is not compulsory that Junee Shire Council be a member of a WoLG; and, as chain of responsibility becomes more widespread, there is now, more than ever, a greater incentive for each operator within a supply chain to ensure that heavy vehicles are not over-loaded or otherwise in breach of the particular laws covering their operation.

However, the chain of responsibility has not yet permeated the freight industry to the point where it makes the WoLGs redundant. There continue to be a high number of breaches recorded across the group and in the most recent statistics, there has been a reversal of the previous declining trend of breaches; in 2014/15 breaches per intercept dropped dramatically to its lowest ever point indicating a significant increase in non-compliance despite less intercepts. It is the firm belief of staff that there remains a sufficient number of operators willing to breach heavy vehicle laws as to warrant continuing involvement with SEWOL.

There is no real alternative to SEWOL should the Council wish to terminate its membership. Discussions held with neighbouring shires that are not members of the group have revealed a declining availability of NSW Road and Maritime enforcement officers. In the course of these conversations, it was indicated that a number of the councils that are currently not members were entertaining the thought of joining SEWOL.

In association with routine patrols, SEWOL Inspectors are available to respond to particular or repeat offenders. Junee Shire utilised this service extensively in 2009 in response to quarry operations causing significant damage to River Road.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 29 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Deed of Agreement

A draft Deed of Agreement is attached. The Deed is held with Queanbeyan City Council and is for a period of four years and commits Junee Shire Council to funding, on the basis of an even distribution, the operating and capital costs associated with operating the group. This model is currently under review by the Management Committee and may be adjusted to better reflect a ‘user-pays’ model.

To execute the Deed, the Council is required to resolve to affix the Council’s seal and the Mayor and General Manager to sign.

Budget

The annual contribution has previously been $20,000 per annum. Under the current model, this contribution will continue with an adjustment for CPI in March 2016.

However, as previously mentioned, the funding model is currently being reviewed to ascertain whether the group would be better served by a different model. And while this review has not yet been finalised, a certain outcome for the Council should a different model be adopted would be a lowering of the contribution.

The annual contribution has previously been accommodated in operational budgets for urban, rural and regional sealed roads.

Conclusion

The Southeast Weights of Loads Group has been operating for some 20 years under various Deeds of Agreement, providing enforcement of heavy vehicle services for 11 councils across the south east of NSW.

The current Deed of Agreement expires 1 December 2015. A renewal of the Deed requires the Council to resolve to affix the seal and for the Mayor and General Manager to execute it.

Junee Shire Council has gained considerable value from being a member of the Weights of Loads Group with it receiving a significant subsidy for the services rendered. It is the firm belief of staff that there is value in remaining a member of SEWOL and that the annual cost of $20,000 (subject to CPI) presents a sound investment in protecting the Council’s most valuable infrastructure asset class: roads.

Recommendation:

That Junee Shire Council execute the Southeast Weights of Loads Group Deed of Agreement by affixing the Seal of Junee Shire Council.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 30 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

9[ADDES] PROPOSED 21 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION – DA 2015/43 LOT 14 DP 833292 AND LOT 1 DP 391956 14 JOHN POTTS DRIVE AND 25 KITCHENER STREET JUNEE

Reference: DA No. 2015/43 Date Received: 31 August 2015 Applicant: Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church PO Box 5668 WAGGA WAGGA NSW 2650 Owner: As above Property: Lot: 14 DP 833292 and Lot 1 DP 391956, 14 John Potts Drive and 25 Kitchener Street JUNEE Area of Land: 7.1510ha Proposal: 21 lot residential subdivision

Proposal Description

Council is in receipt of a Development Application for a 21 lot residential subdivision on land owned by the Roman Catholic Church located in the vicinity of John Potts Drive, Kitchener Street and Anzac Parade, Junee.

The proposal consists of a staged subdivision comprising:

Stage 1 • subdivision of Lot 1 DP 391956 into 12 new residential lots and 1 residue lot (Stage 2) • construction of road access in Lot 14 DP 833292 to provide road access to John Potts Drive • construction of a cul-de-sac servicing proposed Lots 1-10 and part construction of an internal road servicing proposed Lots 11 and 12

Stage 2 • subdivision of the residue lot from Stage 1 into 9 residential lots and 1 residue lot (school) • extension of road access servicing Lots 11 and 12 • construction of a second cul-de-sac servicing proposed lots 213-221

A copy of the plan of subdivision and associated documentation has been attached for Councillors information.

Notification and Consultation

The proposed subdivision was advertised in the Southern Cross newspaper from the 3 September 2015 to the 17 September 2015.

Notification of adjoining owners was carried out from the 3 September 2015 and extended to the 23 September 2015 to accommodate representations from an adjoining landowner.

The application was referred to Goldenfields County Council for comment regarding water supply for the proposed development.

Four submissions have been received in response to the proposal and these submissions are attached for information.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 31 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Application Negotiations

Council completed a preliminary assessment of the application and requested additional information from the applicant on the 15 September 2015.

This related to information regarding:

• the hydraulic capacity of existing stormwater and sewerage assets and the increased load on these assets resulting from the development • information regarding proposed internal roads • the extent and depth of fill within the site • design issues regarding lot layouts • geotechnical stability of uncontrolled cut/fill embankments within the site • public access from proposed internal roads to the school and Anzac Avenue

The applicant provided a response to this request on the 12 October 2015.

A meeting with the applicant and Council officers was held on the 21 October 2015. This meeting identified the remaining issues Council seeks further response to. From that meeting the applicant has requested that if Council considers supporting the current proposal in principle that these technical issues be dealt within the terms of a deferred commencement approval.

Zoning and Permissibility

The land is zoned RU5 Village under the Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 (LEP). The proposed subdivision is permitted with consent of Council. The minimum lot size for subdivision within the RU5 zoning is 500m2. The proposal includes lot size ranging from 600m2 to 2000m2.

Planning Context

Context and Setting in the Locality

The site is a strategically important infill development site for Junee. The site immediately adjoins the Roman Catholic Church and school complex to the south, lots within John Potts Estate generally to the east and north-east, Monte Cristo homestead generally to the north and north- west and zoned vacant residential land immediately to the west.

The site has been historically used for sporting grounds. The site contains a range of vegetation mainly along the boundaries of the site to the north/east and west. The site includes two large terrace areas. On the periphery of the terraces appears to be large areas of uncontrolled fill. The two terraces are separated by a large embankment and there appears to be extensive filling along the eastern boundary adjoining properties within Pike Place.

The proposed access from John Potts Drive to the site is through an existing previously subdivided residential allotment.

Junee Residential Strategy 2006

Lot 1 DP 391956 was identified by Council under the Junee Residential Strategy 2006 to facilitate the rezoning of this land from rural to residential. This site was identified as a strategically important infill residential site in Junee. This land was subsequently rezoned with the gazettal of the new Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 in December 2012. ______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 32 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

This Strategy, apart from recommending rezoning of the land, identified the following specific development considerations for this site:

• the site was identified as having a potential density of 20 lots due to slope and terracing within the site,

• road access from either the end of Vaughan Street (southern end of the school) or Homestead Lane (northern end of the site adjoining Monte Cristo)

• a buffer to Monte Cristo was to be retained,

• the portion of the site to the west of the school might be a possible site for and aged care facility as this part of the site is flat and well protected,

• development along the northern section of the land should be restricted to one or two allotments. This would ensure privacy to the existing blocks (along John Potts Drive) as well privacy to these new allotments from further development above the school fields,

• screening of the drainage easement and Convent, and

• retain vegetation within the northern part of the development site.

The current proposal does not provide a response to the development and siting controls recommended in Council’s adopted Residential Strategy. The current proposal:

• alters the recommended arrangements for access to the site to provide access directly from John Potts Drive

• includes five not two allotments along the northern boundary of the site as recommended to address site constraints

• does not identify how a buffer to Monte Cristo will be provided

• does not identify treatment of the drainage easement or the Convent

It is acknowledged that the strategy identified the potential for an additional 20 residential lots from this site. However given the design conditions identified in Council’s strategy it is assumed that the subdivision of this site may have included a higher number of smaller lots. The current proposal includes only two allotments of 656m2 and 646m2 in area. In discussions with the applicant the indication is that the marketability of smaller lots in Junee is limited. However depending on the finding of site investigations the applicant indicated that the more constrained parts of the site may include adjustments to incorporate larger lots to address vegetation, building constraints and areas of potential uncontrolled fill.

Traffic, Parking & Access

The proposal includes the construction of a new intersection with John Potts Drive, a public road over Lot 14 and two new internal roads with cul-de-sacs.

In terms of traffic generated by the development the most recent surveys of regional traffic generation from low density residential developments from the NSW Road and Maritime Services

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 33 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015. indicates that daily vehicle trips of up to 7.4 per dwelling could be expected from the proposed subdivision. The proposal has been assessed by Council’s Director of Engineering Services and the following comments are made in respect of road access and traffic:

The impacts of the development with respect to the generation of traffic on existing road infrastructure are not anticipated to have a detrimental effect on either the performance of the asset over its life or on road safety outcomes.

With regard to the former, John Potts Drive is of sufficient construction to comfortably accommodate these extra vehicle movements; it has been designed and constructed to accommodate future traffic loading from infill and Greenfield development.

With regard to the latter, the proposed intersection has stopping sight distances along John Potts Drive of approximately 130m in both directions; the minimum required for a 50km/h design speed is 62m, therefore there is adequate sight distance.

Utilities

Water

The application was referred to Goldenfields Water County Council (GWCC) for comment. Advice from GWCC indicates that water supply is available to supply the proposed subdivision. The nearest main is located on the northern side of John Potts Drive. The developer will be required to meet the full cost of the new infrastructure to service their development. This includes extension of new water mains and service pipes for individual lots. Current development charges that will apply to the development per lot are $7429. The developer will be required to make an application for water services with GWCC.

Stormwater

As it is currently proposed, stormwater generated from the eastern portion of the site would be drained to the north-eastern corner of the site to an existing public stormwater line that traverses private property. The remainder of the site would ultimately be drained by the new proposed road through existing lot 14 to John Potts Drive.

The applicant was requested to provide information on the likely flows that would be generated from the development, particularly those that drain toward the north-eastern corner of the site. The concern is that if flows are not assessed properly, or allowances not made for appropriate surcharging, the development could cause nuisance flooding of adjoining properties. There is sufficient flexibility within the scope of the development to address the disposal of stormwater whilst limiting, if not eliminating the impact on adjoining landowners and public stormwater drains.

Sewerage

The applicant was requested to provide information in the form of an assessment of the capacity of the existing sewer main and the impact of the development on existing mains. Undertaking this assessment will require considerable resources.

In discussions with Council the applicant has requested that Council consider providing some security of approval for the subdivision before resources are invested into further investigations. Engineering Services are confident that there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be sufficient

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 34 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015. capacity, however the appropriate investigations will need to be undertaken to support the development.

Flora and Fauna

The subject site is generally cleared and is not identified as an area of biodiversity value under Council’s LEP 2012.

There are however some important remnants of vegetation within the boundaries of the land. At this stage only survey information has been submitted with the proposal identifying the position of existing trees within the site.

The northern boundary of the site contains a number of well-established native trees. This area has been previously identified by Council as being an important visual buffer to the Monte Cristo homestead from the site.

The issue of this area of the site was raised with the applicant for a response on the likely impacts of proposed Lots 3, 4 and 5 of the subdivision. The applicant has responded by identifying building envelopes for proposed Lots 4 and 5, not proposed Lot 3, with rear and side setbacks of 5 metres to the boundaries of these lots. From the survey information provided the boundaries of the proposed building envelopes will result in the removal of the majority of this vegetation. This is not an acceptable arrangement to manage this part of the site.

It is accepted that some of this vegetation will have to be removed to site future dwellings however further detailed assessment is required for this area, including consideration of alterations to lot design, to minimise the removal of the existing vegetation where practical.

Social and Economic Effects

Council has sought to increase the supply of residential land in Junee by rezoning this site. In preparing the Residential Land Strategy Council flagged that the social and economic benefits of this land are important to contribute to overall social and economic development in Junee.

Matters for Consideration

Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act 1979) – Section 79C Considerations

In determining a Development Application, a consent authority must take into consideration the following matters as they are relevant to the development the subject of the Development Application.

Section 79C (1) (a) – Environmental Planning Instruments and Development Control Plans

State Environmental Planning Policies

There are no State Environmental Planning Policies that are relevant to the proposed subdivision. The site has not been identified as being contaminated land and the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 do not apply.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 35 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Regional Environmental Plans

There are no Regional Environmental plans that are relevant to the proposed subdivision.

Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012

The site is currently zoned as RU5 Village Zone under the Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 (the LEP).

The following are relevant parts of the LEP in relation to the current proposal:

Clause 1.2 Aims

The proposal is generally consistent with the following aims of the LEP:

• to encourage a range of housing, employment, recreation and facilities to meet the needs of existing and future residents of Junee, • to provide for a range of development opportunities that contribute to the social, economic and environmental resources of the area and support the long-term and economic viability of the local community, • to encourage a variety of housing types in Junee, including affordable housing, to accommodate different levels of income and improve housing choice, and • to protect and enhance places and buildings of archaeological, cultural or heritage significance in Junee.

The proposal aims to provide for a variety of housing types and locations within Junee. The proposal, subject to further investigation and verification, can better achieve outcomes in relation to the heritage significance of Monte Cristo homestead.

Clause 2.3 Objectives of zone

The proposal is generally consistent with the objectives of the RU5 Village Zone which include:

• To provide for a range of land uses, services and facilities that are associated with a rural village. • To promote and encourage development that will strengthen the economies of Junee and the villages of Wantabadgery, Illabo, Bethungra and Old Junee in a manner that is compatible with their urban function. • To enable a range of housing forms and complementary business uses taking into account the distinct character of each urban area.

Council’s Residential Strategy specifically considers what the future urban form for Junee. For this site in particular there are specific site constraints that imply a specific development scenario. The current proposal is inconsistent with Council’s endorsed Strategy and the design concept for this site requires further development.

Clause 5.10 Heritage conservation

Council may on land that is within the vicinity of an identified heritage item require a heritage management document to be prepared that assesses the extent to which the carrying out of the proposed development would affect the heritage significance of the heritage item or heritage conservation area concerned.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 36 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

The Monte Cristo homestead has been identified in Schedule 5 of the Junee LEP 2012 as an item of heritage significance. This includes the main building and surrounding land which are of local heritage significance. The applicant has indicated that the location of the site and position of future lots is unlikely to have a significant impact on the Monte Cristo site and a heritage management report is not required.

In response to the requirement for a heritage management report the following matters require consideration by Council:

• the Monte Cristo site is surrounded by zoned residential land with some of that land developed and available for further subdivision, • the development will have an impact on the physical boundaries of the Monte Cristo site, • Council has identified that retaining a buffer to the Monte Cristo site is an important consideration, and • the existing vegetation between the site and Monte Cristo has been identified to be of high importance

The proposed subdivision is not inconsistent with the scale and context of surrounding residential land uses.

It is considered that the key issue is retaining a buffer between this development and the Monte Cristo site. While a heritage management report is not recommended to be provided, consideration of the retention and enhancement of vegetation within this part of the site is recommended. This is further discussed in this report.

Clause 6.1 Earthworks

The objective of this clause is to ensure that earthworks for which development consent is required will not have a detrimental impact on environmental functions and processes, neighbouring uses, cultural or heritage items or features of the surrounding land.

This clause requires that Council considers a range of matters relating to earthworks associated with development of the site including soil stability and drainage. These issues are discussed further in this report.

Clause 6.3 Stormwater management

The objective of this clause is to minimise the impacts of urban stormwater and avoid any significant adverse impacts of stormwater runoff on adjoining properties. This is further discussed within this report.

Clause 6.8 Salinity

The site has been identified as saline land within the LEP. It is unlikely that the proposal will have an adverse impact on saline processes with the implementation of measures to address salinity for future buildings.

Clause 6.9 Essential services

The site has the potential to be serviced with water, sewerage, access and stormwater drainage. An assessment of the capacity of reticulated water supply has been completed. The issues relating to other services being available and capacity of those systems are further discussed in this report. ______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 37 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Junee Shire Development Control Plans

The applicant has considered the previous Development Control Plans as development guidelines. This is consistent with advice to Council in September 2015 that Council’s current DCPs are no longer a legal matter for consideration. The exhibition of Draft Junee Shire DCP 2015 will not occur until the end of 2015 and into early 2016. At this stage the proposal is not inconsistent with the intent of the previous DCPs.

Section 79C (1) (b) – The likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts, on both the natural and built environments and social and economic impacts in the locality

The current proposal to develop this land for residential purposes is consistent with the objectives of the zone. The likely impacts of this proposal have been identified as including:

• impacts on drainage and related infrastructure • vegetation within the northern part of the site • privacy and amenity of adjoining residential areas • the adjoining values of the Monte Cristo heritage site • the importance of this site as a potential residential infill

These matters have been considered and addressed within this report.

Section 79C (1) (c) – Suitability of the site for the development

The suitability of the land for residential development needs to be considered having regard not only to current, but also the future, condition of the site. The current zoning of the land has determined that Council considers that this site is generally suitable for residential purposes. The main issues associated with determining the suitability of this site to support the proposed development are:

• the impact of the development on existing sewerage and drainage infrastructure, and • the geotechnical implications of cut and fill across the site including uncontrolled fill and public batter stability

In respect of sewerage and stormwater infrastructure, there are a number of concerns that have not yet been addressed by the applicant to the satisfaction of staff:

• suitable investigations/plans for determining the impact of stormwater generated by the development on existing public infrastructure and the impact on adjoining owners have not been completed, • suitable investigations/plans for determining the impact of sewage flows on existing public infrastructure have not yet been completed

Council staff have assessed the potential for these issues to be addressed by the applicant and are satisfied that there is sufficient flexibility within the scope of the proposal to address these two items. However, it is recommended that Council request these investigations with the specific aims of:

• identifying the capacity of public stormwater and sewage infrastructure, • an assessment of the impact of the development on the capacity of this infrastructure, and • appropriate measures/recommendations to eliminate any:

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 38 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

- nuisance flooding of adjoining landowners - nuisance flooding of any future landowners (i.e. future owners of the proposed lots should it proceed) - the surcharging of any of the public sewer or drain

In response to the geotechnical implications associated with the site there are a number of significant site constraints that have not been addressed by the applicant:

• the site contains areas of cut and fill which are not mapped or identified in the current application or supporting documentation, • there are excessive batter slopes (up to 30%) within the site, • there are areas of uncontrolled fill, and • the cross sections of internal roads indicates the need to establish retaining systems within the road reserves

These issues affect all design aspects of the proposed subdivision as well as development within each proposed lot. While Council does not have a formal policy regarding when geotechnical investigations are required there is a need to evaluate the current and future physical suitability of the site to:

• address the impact of works associated with subdividing the land, and • the subsequent development of the land for residential dwellings and related structures.

It is recommended that Council request this investigation with the specific aims of:

• identifying the extent of cut and fill across the site • an assessment of the geotechnical suitability, include slope stability, of the site for the proposed development • an appropriate site classification in accordance with the requirements of AS 2870 – 1996 as amended • recommendations on alterations to the subdivision layout where needed • recommendations on site preparation and earthworks • recommendations on excavations and retaining structures for both private and public land, and • an appropriate foundation system for the proposed development.

Section 79C (1) (d) – Any submissions made in accordance with the Act or the Regulations

The application was advertised for general public comments and the adjoining and adjacent land owners were notified of the proposal in writing by the Council. At the conclusion of the notification period, four submissions had been received.

These submissions raise the following issues:

• the restrictions on an adjoining owner having access to the rear of land in Pike Place • impacts on property values • noise associated with construction work • the impacts on privacy of adjoining properties given the slope and levels within proposed lots with a shared boundary • restrictions on the height of new dwelling houses due to privacy concerns • drainage at the rear of existing properties adjoining the site ______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 39 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

• the impacts of traffic associated with the proposed road from John Potts Drive and relocation of services

Issues raised within the submissions are summarised and discussed below:

Rear access to existing properties

One submission raises concern relating to restrictions on access and the desire to retain road access to the rear of an existing property fronting Pike Place. This submission indicates that Council has previously approved a garage and access through the development site. A search of Council’s records indicate that it had approved a storage shed on this property to store boats, motor bikes, box trailers and the like. No approval for access to this shed from the rear of the property was given. Should the land owner seek to gain another legal access to that land this would be subject to separate legal negotiations with the current land owner and the Council.

Impacts on property values

Submissions raise concerns about devaluation of properties associated with approval of the subdivision. The potential development options for this land could include a range of land uses within the current RU5 zoning. The proposed residential land uses are similar to the surrounding area and there is no evidence that developing this land will devalue adjoining properties.

Noise from construction work

One submission raises concern regarding noise impacts associated with construction activities. The development of the site will generate a level of noise for a specific time period during construction of roads and related services for the subdivision. These activities are controlled under noise regulations and specific regulatory time periods apply. Construction noise is regulated under the EPA guidelines for construction. There is a request that these times be limited due to a neighbouring property owner being a shift worker. While the circumstances of this adjoining owner are acknowledged construction activities are limited to daylight hours only relevant to a normal working day.

Privacy

The design of the subdivision places eight new residential allotments with shared rear boundaries to eight adjoining properties in Pike Place and John Potts Drive.

The previous filling across the development site has resulted in elevated finished ground levels within the majority of these proposed allotments. This height varies between 3 and 4 metres.

Concerns in two submissions received relate to impacts on privacy, overlooking and the location of future dwelling houses on each lot.

The following aerial photograph overlay indicates the position of adjoining dwelling houses and the rear yard areas in relation to the proposed subdivision.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 40 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

In considering the impacts on privacy the following issues are relevant:

• the land behind the existing dwelling houses naturally slopes uphill from rear boundaries – the location of fill within some of these lots has increased the height of existing ground levels

• the majority of the filled areas of the proposed eight lots is uncontrolled fill. At this stage there is concern about the stability of filling within these lots and the need for geotechnical investigations. These investigations are likely to recommend earthworks across this site that will alter the final levels of proposed roads and may also result in adjustments to the final boundaries of the proposed eight allotments.

• distances to existing dwelling houses from the rear boundary of the existing adjoining lots varies from 6m to 30m – two adjoining dwellings have reduced setbacks being No 2 Homestead Lane and No 4 Pike Place. The majority of existing adjoining dwellings are primarily setback to their street frontage with the rear of these lots being back yard areas. The depth of the proposed eight lots (from the frontage to the new internal roads to the rear boundary) is between 32m and 62m. The combined physical distances means that there are options to site new dwelling houses within these lots that maximise privacy to adjoining properties. ______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 41 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

• proposed Lot 11 is the only exception as this runs parallel to the boundaries of two lots fronting John Potts Drive however there is a large existing shed that would effectively screen any future dwelling house on this lot.

To address the issues of privacy and overlooking it is considered reasonable that building envelopes be identified within each of the proposed eight allotments that minimises overlooking and privacy. Given the circumstances associated with uncontrolled fill these building envelopes might include reducing finished ground levels to achieve site stability, retaining vegetation and locating new buildings that maximise separation distances to rear boundaries.

Building height restrictions

The submissions received raise concern about future building heights. This relates directly to the impacts on privacy of adjoining owners. As discussed above the main concerns relate to the lots immediately adjoining properties in John Potts Drive and Pike Place. The suggestion to limit the building heights to single storey on these lots is considered a reasonable request that will, in combination of building envelopes, reduce the likely impacts on privacy and overlooking.

Site drainage

The submissions received raise concern about the impacts of stormwater drainage from the site post development. The submissions highlight that there is an existing drain located along the rear boundaries of the properties fronting Pike Place and John Potts Drive.

The concerns raised in this submission are valid. The earlier recommendation that the applicant undertake investigations relating to stormwater will provide the information required to determine how to reduce, if not eliminate the impacts on adjoining properties.

Traffic impacts

Submissions raise concern about the impact of the proposed access road from John Potts Drive to the subdivision and traffic generated by this development. In response to the issue of the proposed access road John Potts Drive serves as a major feeder road to this residential part of Junee. It has been designed and constructed to accommodate current and future traffic volumes. Homestead Lane does not legally adjoin the site and the only legal alternative access point to the site is from an unmade section of road from Anzac Ave and Kitchener Street. This access point is not considered a practical option to service the site.

There is sufficient width in lot 14 to accommodate a standard urban street. The construction of this street will see the carriageway of the new road within approximately 10m of the side of an adjoining property whereas that property currently has an offset from John Potts Drive in excess of 20m.

Section 79C(1) (e) – Public Interest

The development of this site for a land use compatible with Council’s Residential Strategy and residential zoning is within the broader public interest of containing a reasonable urban footprint for Junee. The location of this land and the proximity of the site to facilities within Junee support a broader public interest in the future development of Junee.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 42 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Deferred commencement consent

The applicant has indicated from the meeting with Council officers on the 21 October 2015 that if Council should consider that the proposed subdivision is to be supported that preference for the engineering and related matters be dealt with as deferred commencement matters.

Section 80 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 provides that Council must determine a development application by either granting consent (either unconditionally or subject to conditions) or refusing consent. Section 80(3) provides Council with the option to issue a deferred commencement approval. This development consent granted with specific conditions that must be satisfied before the consent legally operates. This allows those matters that are relevant to the proposal to be completed with confidence that Council is satisfied the proposed development can proceed. A deferred commencement consent can address matters relating to specific engineering investigations, design changes and other relevant matters that facilitate the proposal.

The process for dealing with deferred commencement consent conditions is regulated by clause 95 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. The steps which must be taken, to make the consent operative, are:

• the applicant produces evidence for Council sufficient to enable it to be satisfied as to the matters specified in the deferred commencement condition (clause 95(3) of the Regulation)

• Council must notify the applicant whether or not it is satisfied of the matter specified in the deferred commencement condition (clause 95(4))

• if Council is satisfied, the consent becomes operative upon the notification of that satisfaction

• if Council does not confirm satisfaction with the evidence provided, the applicant has an appeal right.

It is considered that this request for a deferred commencement approval is reasonable given the land is suitable for residential development however with certain matters being addressed to the satisfaction of Council.

Conclusion

The current proposal represents a new residential infill development within Junee. The current proposal in principle is consistent with the zoning of the site and other statutory planning controls. There is a need to undertake further investigations of the site to respond to site suitability issues raised by Council and through public submissions to the proposal. These can be considered through a deferred commencement consent process.

Recommendation 1:

That pursuant to Section 80 (3) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Council issues Deferred Commencement Consent for Development Application No. 2015/43 for the subdivision of Lot: 14 DP 833292 and Lot 1 DP 391956, 14 John Potts Drive and 25 Kitchener Street Junee for 21 residential lots in two stages as outlined below.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 43 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Recommendation 2:

That Council notify the persons making submissions to the proposal of Council’s decision in this matter.

“DEFERRED COMMENCEMENT”

This is a ‘Deferred Commencement Consent’ under Section 80(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, (as amended). This consent shall not operate until the applicant satisfies the consent authority by producing satisfactory evidence relating to the matters set out in Schedule "A". Such evidence is to be provided within 12 months of the date of notification.

Upon the consent authority being satisfied as to compliance with the matters set out in Schedule "A". The consent shall become operative and take effect from the date of notification under Section 95 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations subject to the conditions set out in Schedule "B" and any additional conditions arising from the requirements of Schedule ‘A’.

SCHEDULE "A"

Conditions imposed pursuant to Section 80(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and Section 95 of the Regulations as amended.

Deferred Commencement Condition 1- Geotechnical Assessment

A geotechnical investigation of the site and report is to be prepared by a suitably qualified practising geotechnical engineer. This report will:

• identify the extent of cut and fill across the site

• assess the geotechnical suitability, include slope stability, of the site for the proposed development

• provide an appropriate site classification in accordance with the requirements of AS 2870 – 1996 as amended

• provide recommendations on alterations to the subdivision layout where needed to address areas of uncontrolled fill

• provide recommendations for site preparation and earthworks

• provide recommendations on excavations, drainage and retaining structures within private land and any road reserves, and

• provides an appropriate foundation system for the proposed development.

Deferred Commencement Condition 2- Vegetation Management Plan

A detailed vegetation management plan will be prepared by a qualified arborist for proposed Lots 3, 4 and 5 to:

• identify the existing vegetation within the these allotments and this part of the site

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 44 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

• identify that vegetation to be retained to buffer the Monte Cristo homestead • provide recommendations on how to manage this part of the site in regard to future building envelopes required by Deferred Commencement condition 3

Deferred Commencement Condition 3- Building envelope plan

A building envelope plan is to be prepared identifying future building envelopes, to be incorporated within Section 88B restrictions for proposed Lots 1 to 5, 11 and 12 inclusive and Lots 213 to 215 inclusive, to address the following:

• no building zones that minimise the impacts of new dwellings, garages and ancillary structures from immediately adjoining properties, • finished building height levels to permit single storey building construction only, and • reduced setbacks to front boundaries to maximise separation distances from rear boundaries and adjoining residential lots

Deferred Commencement Condition 4- Engineering detail

A detailed engineering assessment, by a qualified engineer, is to be provided to Council that assesses the hydraulic capacity of the existing reticulated sewerage and stormwater system to accommodate the proposed residential subdivision. This assessment is to address the following key issues:

• identify the capacity of public stormwater and sewage infrastructure, • make an assessment of the impact of the development on the capacity of this infrastructure, and • develop appropriate measures/recommendations to eliminate any:

- nuisance flooding of adjoining landowners - nuisance flooding of any future landowners (i.e. future owners of the proposed lots should it proceed) - the surcharging of any of the public sewer or drain

SCHEDULE “B”

This part of the consent will not become operable until Council advises that the matters contained in Schedule A are satisfied.

Prescribed Conditions of Consent – Stages 1 and 2

The following conditions are known as “Prescribed conditions” and are required by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 to be imposed as part of any development consent whether or not they are relevant to the development approved under this consent. Please do not hesitate to contact staff in Council’s Development and Environmental Department who will be happy to advise you as to whether or not the conditions are relevant to your consent.

1. All building work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia (as in force on the date the application for the relevant construction certificate or complying development certificate was made).

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 45 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Reason: So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

2. In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with part 6 of the Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any building work authorised to be carried out by the consent commences.

Reason: So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

3. Residential building work within the meaning of the Home Building Act 1989 must not be carried out unless the principal certifying authority for the development to which the work relates (not being the council) has given the council written notice of the following information:

• In the case of work for which a principal contractor is required to be appointed:

(ii) the name and licence number of the principal contractor, and (iii) the name of the insurer by which the work is insured under Part 6 of the Act,

• In the case of work to be done by an owner-builder:

(i) the name of the owner-builder, and (ii) if the owner-builder is required to hold an owner-builder permit under the Act, the number of the owner-builder permit.

Reason: So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

4. A sign must be erected in a prominent position on any site on which building work, subdivision work or demolition work is being carried out:

• showing the name, address and telephone number of the principal certifying authority for the work, and • showing the name of the principal contractor (if any) for any building work and a telephone number on which that person may be contacted outside working hours, and • stating that unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited.

Any such sign is to be maintained while the building work is being carried out and must be removed when the work has been completed.

NOTE: This condition does not apply to building work that is carried out inside an existing building that does not affect the external walls of the building.

Reason: So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under clause 98A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

5. Any development that involves an excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building on adjoining land, the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense: ______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 46 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

i. protect and support the adjoining premises from possible damage from the excavation, and ii. where necessary, underpin the adjoining premises to prevent any such damage.

NOTE: The condition referred to in sub clause (1) does not apply if the person having the benefit of the development consent owns the adjoining land or the owner of the adjoining land has given consent in writing to that condition not applying.

Reason: So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98E of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

Advisory Note

(a) Dial Before You Dig

Underground assets may exist in the area that is subject to your application. In the interests of health and safety and in order to protect damage to third party assets please contact Dial Before You Dig at www.1100.com.au or telephone 1100 before excavating or erecting structures (This is the law in NSW). If alterations are required to the configuration, size, form or design of the development upon contacting the Dial Before You Dig service, an amendment to the development consent (or a new development application) may be necessary. Individuals owe asset owners a duty of care that must be observed when working in the vicinity of plant or assets. It is the individual’s responsibility to anticipate and request the nominal location of plant or assets on the relevant property via contacting the Dial Before You Dig service in advance of any construction or planning activities.

(b) Telecommunications Act 1997 (Commonwealth)

Telstra (and its authorised contractors) are the only companies that are permitted to conduct works on Telstra’s network and assets. Any person interfering with a facility or installation owned by Telstra is committing an offence under the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) and is liable for prosecution. Furthermore, damage to Telstra’s infrastructure may result in interruption to the provision of essential services and significant costs. If you are aware of any works or proposed works which may affect or impact on Telstra’s assets in any way, you are required to contact: Telstra’s Network Integrity Team by phoning 1800 810 443.

CONDITIONS APPLYING BEFORE WORKS COMMENCE – STAGES 1 AND 2

(1) If the development is likely to disturb or impact upon telecommunications infrastructure, written confirmation from the service provider that they have agreed to the proposed works must be submitted to the Principal Certifying authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate or any works commencing, whichever occurs first.

The arrangements and costs associated with any adjustment to telecommunications infrastructure shall be borne in full by the applicant/developer.

Reason: to prevent the possible damage to telecommunications infrastructure.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 47 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Operational Conditions of Consent – Stages 1 and 2

1. Compliance with Consent: The Development being carried out generally in accordance with plans and supporting information as stamped by Council including Planning Report and Statement of Environmental Effects dated August 2015 and Layout Plan No C01 dated 24 April 2015, except where varied by conditions of this consent.

Reason: To confirm the details of the application as submitted by the applicant and as approved by Council.

2. Construction Certificate Required: A Construction Certificate must be obtained from a Principal Certifying Authority.

NOTE: Prior to the issue of Construction Certificate, all Section 94A Levy Contributions must be paid to the Council pursuant to Clause 146 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

Reason: To ensure that minimum standards relating to structural adequacy, health and amenity are met.

3. Water Provision: Potable water is to be available to each allotment by payment of a standard connection fee to the Supply Authority. Documentary evidence that arrangements have been made with Goldenfields Water County Council for the supply of water to the subdivision is to be submitted to Council prior to the release of the survey plan.

Reason: To ensure services are available to the proposed development.

4. Gas Provision: Natural gas is to be available to each allotment by payment of a standard connection fee to the Supply Authority. Documentary evidence that arrangements have been made with AGL for the supply of gas to the subdivision is to be submitted to Council prior to the release of the survey plan.

Reason: To ensure services are available to the proposed development.

5. Sewer Services: Council sewer is to be available to each allotment by payment of a standard connection fee to Junee Shire Council. Documentary evidence that arrangements have been made with Junee Shire Council for the supply of sewer to the subdivision is to be submitted to Council prior to the release of the survey plan.

Reason: To ensure the services are available to the proposed development.

6. Sewer Mains Extension: The sewer main is to be extended at the applicant’s expense to service all allotments. A suitable design for the extension requires Council approval prior to commencement of work.

Reason: To ensure separate services are provided to the development.

7. Sewer Headworks: Prior to the release of the subdivision certificate, the sewer headworks charge per new lot created is to be paid to the Council.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 48 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Reason: Future buildings on the lot(s) created will generate an additional demand on the Council’s sewerage infrastructure network.

8. Telephone: Connection to telephone mains is to be available to each allotment by payment of the standard connection fee to the Supply Authority. Documentary evidence that arrangements have been made with the Supply Authority is to be submitted to Council prior to the release of the survey plan.

Reason: To ensure services are available to the proposed development.

9. Power Supply: Power is to be available to each allotment by payment of a standard connection fee to Essential Energy. Documentary evidence that arrangements have been made with Essential Energy is to be submitted to Council prior to the release of the survey plan.

Reason: To ensure services are available to the proposed development.

10. Services: All services shall be underground including electricity, apart from road illumination lamps, and all services shall be installed where appropriate in a common trench with the works as executed drawings being provided for Council as a permanent record of the installations.

Reason: To ensure the utility services are protected and satisfactory for the residential amenity.

11. Service Notification: The developer is to submit written confirmation to Council that Goldenfields Water County Council, Telstra, AGL and Essential Energy have been advised of the approved subdivision.

Reason: To reflect the relevant considerations required under the provisions of Section 79C (1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Associated Guidelines, and to ensure the health and safety of persons accessing the site, and persons using public roads.

12. Public Land Costs: Costs attributed to all work involved on public land shall be borne by the proponent.

Reason: Need for applicants to be responsible for costs arising as a result of development work.

13. Registration of Subdivision Plans: In accordance with s.109C of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, the applicant is required to obtain a subdivision certificate from the consent authority that will authorise the registration of the plan of sub-division under Division 3 of Part 23 of the Conveyancing Act, 1919. The subdivision certificate is in the format supplied to the consent authority upon the plan acceptable to the Registrar General.

Reason: The legal obligations of Council to administer the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979.

14. If any relics or artefacts are unearthed during any construction work, all work is to cease and the National Parks and Wildlife Service is to be contacted. Work is not to recommence without their consent.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 49 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Reason: To ensure that the relevance of any relics or artefacts are investigated reflecting the relevant considerations required under the provisions of Section 79C(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the associated Guidelines.

15. Soil Erosion Control: Run-off and erosion control measures shall be incorporated into site management during construction and effectively maintained until the site has been stabilised. Care shall be taken to ensure that no nuisance is created to adjoining properties or public spaces by way of sediment run-off.

Reason: To ensure that adequate measures are in place to that damage from sediment run-off to adjoining sites and waterways is minimised.

16. Construction noise: In accordance with the NSW Interim Construction Noise Guideline the following noise limits apply to the site.

Work type Recommended standard hours of work Normal construction Monday to Friday 7 am to 6 pm Saturday 8 am to 1 pm No work on Sundays or public holidays Blasting Monday to Friday 9 am to 5 pm Saturday 9 am to 1 pm No blasting on Sundays or public holidays

In the event of rock breaking or blasting being required, the Applicant shall make arrangements to inspect all existing structures in the vicinity that may be affected by vibrations caused by the blasting or rock breaking activity. All inspections are to be documented and a copy of the inspection report is to be provided to each property owner prior to any activities commencing.

Reason: To ensure that adequate measures are in place to limit noise disturbance and damage to adjoining properties.

Stage 2 Condition only - Public access to Anzac Avenue

17. That a three metre concrete walkway is to be constructed from the internal road to the existing road reserve along the southern boundary of proposed Lot 214. Public street lighting is to be installed at the entry of the pathway from the proposed internal road. Signage and vehicle control measures are to be installed at the entry and exit points of this path. This path is to be dedicated to Council as a public land at no cost to Council.

Reason: To ensure that adequate measures are in place to limit noise disturbance and damage to adjoining properties

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 50 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

10[ADDES] SECTION 96 AMENDMENT – DA 2012/8 LOT 14 DP 1035451 17 LOUGHAN ROAD JUNEE

Reference: DA No. 2012/8 Date Received: 8 October 2015 Applicant: Salvestro Planning 16 Fitzmaurice Street WAGGA WAGGA NSW 2650 Owner: Mr Brad Ellem ERP Property Pty Ltd PO Box 2446 WAGGA WAGGA NSW 2650 Property: Lot: 14 DP : 1035451, 17 Loughan Road JUNEE Area of Land: 7141.33m2 Proposal: Section 96 Amendment – Adjustment to approved lot boundaries

Background

Development Application 2018/8 was approved by Council on 19 July 2012 for a two lot subdivision of Lot 14 DP 1035451, 17 Loughan Road Junee.

This approval created two lots – Proposed Lot 1- 2138m2 and Proposed Lot 2 – 5002m2. The application was approved subject to 18 conditions. Council amended conditions relating to kerb and guttering on the 19 October 2012.

On the 8 October 2015 Council received an application pursuant to Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to amend the lot layout to reduce the size of the previous Lot 2 (now Proposed Lot 1) from 5002m2 to 4000m2 and an increase in the size of the previous Lot 1 (now Proposed Lot 2) from 2138m2 to 3100m2. This is the second amendment to the approved development. The proposed amendment is indicated in the extract from the Section 96 application below.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 51 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Notification

Adjoining and adjacent owners, who were notified of the original development application in 2012, were re-notified of the proposed Section 96 Amendment.

At the closing of submissions on the 29 October 2015 no submissions from adjoining owners were received.

Assessment of Section 96 Modification

Council’s previous approval of this proposal was exercised under planning provisions that permit Council to consider development within 50m of the boundary of two different zones. This allowed Council to consider on merit the proposed subdivision of this land.

Lot 14 is now zoned R5 Large Lot Residential. Lot 14 immediately adjoins RU5 Village zoned land along its northern and eastern boundaries. The applicant has provided a statement of environmental effects in support of the proposed amendment.

In assessing the current proposal having regard to Clause 5.3 Development near zone boundaries of the Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 the following matters are relevant to consideration of the proposed amendment.

Flexibility for compatible development

One of the main objectives of Clause 5.3 is to provide flexibility where the investigation of a site and its surroundings reveals that a use allowed on the other side of a zone boundary would enable a more logical and appropriate development of the site and be compatible with the planning objectives and land uses for the adjoining zone.

In the case of this site the gazettal of the Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 reduced the minimum lot size within R5 Large Lot Residential zoned land to 4000m2.

Council previously considered that the subdivision was compatible in this location and the adjustment of the boundary is directly related to the benefit of the zoning changes and the subsequent reduction in the minimum lot size within R5 zoned land. The current proposed amendment does not undermine Council’s previous approval of the subdivision.

Zone objectives and planning principles

In utilising the provisions of Clause 5.3 Council must consider the following matters in re- determining this proposal including:

• the development must not be inconsistent with the objectives for development in both zones, and

• the carrying out of the development is desirable due to compatible land use planning, infrastructure capacity and other planning principles relating to the efficient and timely development of land.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 52 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

The most relevant objectives that support this proposal are those within the R5 Large Lot Residential zone being:

• To ensure that large residential lots do not hinder the proper and orderly development of urban areas in the future, and

• To minimise conflict between land uses within this zone and land uses within adjoining zones.

The current proposal is considered to be consistent with these zone objectives and provides a logical transition between land in the R5 Large Lot Residential and RU5 Village zones.

In considering the timely and efficient development of the land the re-alignment of the boundary does not create any additional infrastructure impacts.

In terms of the planning principles associated with R5 Large Lot Residential zoned land both the lot size and compatible development are considered relevant planning principles. There is no change in the land use associated with the amendment and both lots are of sufficient size to provide for a future dwelling house and ancillary development such as road access, detached garages and the like.

By increasing the size of the proposed Lot 2, immediately adjoining the RU5 Village zoned land to the north and east, this will still accommodate Council building setbacks to provide for landscaping and screening consistent with other development within Crawley Estate.

While the reduction in the lot size of Proposed Lot 1 is, from 5002m2 to 4000m2, is generally inconsistent with the current size of adjoining lots to the south and west it is unlikely that the reduction will impact on the amenity or use of these properties. The immediately adjoining lot to the south of Lot 14 contains a single residence with established landscaping. This residence is located within the centre of the lot and by observing required side setbacks future development on Proposed Lot 1 will still retain reasonable separation.

Conclusion

An assessment of the proposal under Council’s statutory obligations and consideration under Section 79C of the EPA act 1979 indicates that the proposed amendment is acceptable and that modification of the approved plans for Development Application No 2012/8 be approved.

Recommendations:

1. That the Section 96 modification, as submitted to Council on the 8 October 2015 to Development Application No 2012/8, is approved by substituting the amended plans referred to as Figure 1 Proposed Site Layout dated 30 September 2015 and Site Plan dated 24 September 2015 Attachment No 1, for approved plans referred to as Layout Plan dated March 2012 prepared by MJM Consulting Engineers.

2. That a Notice of Determination of Modified Development Application be issued for the proposed amendment.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 53 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

11[ADDES] JUNEE RESIDENTIAL STRATEGY 2006 – DRAFT PROGRESS REPORT

Background

The Junee Residential Strategy 2006 (the Strategy) was prepared for Council to guide future development of Junee up until 2026.

Given that the Strategy is close to 10 years a brief update and progress report (attached) has been prepared for consideration of Council.

This draft report includes specific recommendations regarding actions necessary to finalise the implementation of the strategy as endorsed and to commence the review of the Strategy. Considering these actions will take some time to progress these recommendations are put forward for consideration in the 2016/2017 financial year.

Financial implications

It is estimated that a budget of between $70,000 and $80,000 would be required to undertake the review including the preparation of Structure Plans for Site 3 and 6 in the Junee Residential Strategy.

Recommendations:

1. That Council resolve to commence a full review of the Junee Residential Strategy in the 2016/17 financial year.

2. That this review focuses on:

• better understanding the role of housing choice in Junee associated with work/live trends occurring in the region and housing and rental affordability,

• investigating rural residential land demand and supply, and

• examining the future urban footprint for Junee township to avoid “land locking” expansion by current and future rural residential developments

3. That Council undertake, with this review, the preparation of Structure Plans to identify the potential residential development of Site 3 and 6 and prepare an amendment to the Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 to ensure that these sites are zoned appropriately and available for future residential development.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 54 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

12[ADDES] DRAFT EXPLORATION CODE OF PRACTICE – COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

Background

The NSW Department of Industry Resources and Energy have released for comment a Draft Exploration Code of Practice - Community Consultation guidelines for exploration licences and assessment leases for all resources.

This Draft Code of Practice sets out the mandatory requirements for community engagement.

Comments are requested by the Department by the 30 November 2015.

Impacts of exploration activities

The main objective of the Draft Code of Practice is that prior to commencing any activity authorised by an exploration licence the title holder must prepare a community consultation strategy.

This consultation strategy is based on three levels of identified impact associated with the proposed exploration activity being low, medium and high. These impacts relate to the extent of on-ground works for exploration activities.

The Draft Code of Practice uses a number of thresholds to determine these impacts.

From initial review of the impact thresholds it appears that there would be consultation with Council for exploration activities identified as being low impact.

For activities identified as being medium and high thresholds of impact include a range of factors including population thresholds, separation distances and environmental implications. These are included in Table 1 of the Draft Code of Practice.

It is interesting to note that weighting in the Activity Impact Assessment table includes size of population of the local statistical area as well as the density of dwellings within proximity to the activity.

In the case of Junee Shire it is likely that there would be no weighting applied to the current population or low density of dwellings in relation to medium or high impact activities. While it is acknowledged that the type of activity also identifies the levels of impact assessment this appears to be discretionary.

Considering that the majority of exploration activities are in rural areas of NSW and wider concerns with mining activities the Draft Code presents an unclear message.

It is recommended that Council make submission on the Draft Code of Practice and raise concerns over the differentiation made in the methodology for activity impact assessment that appears to exclude communities such as Junee Shire from consultation over medium and high impact activities.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 55 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Recommendation:

That Council make submission to the NSW Department of Industry Resources and Energy highlighting the concerns regarding the Activity Impact Assessment methodology for medium and high impact activities on the Junee Shire and its residents.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 56 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

13[ADDES] DRAFT JUNEE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN 2015

Council resolved at its meeting on the 15 September 2015:

1. That pursuant to Section 74C of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and Clause 22 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000, Council resolve to prepare “Draft Junee Shire Development Control Plan 2015” to consolidate and update Council existing Development Control Plans.

2. That public exhibition of “Draft Junee Shire Development Control Plan 2015” in accordance with Clause 18 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000.

3. That the “Draft Junee Development Control Plan 2015” be presented to Council after the public exhibition period.

A copy of the draft DCP will be available on request or during the public exhibition period.

The following is a summary of the major key changes associated with the draft DCP:

• Consolidation of all previous DCPs into a single DCP document with relevant chapters • Re-formatting of previous planning controls into Plain English • Removal of duplicated and out dated information regarding DA processes and legislation • Updating of DCP controls to be consistent with the Junee LEP 2012 • Inclusion of new aerial mapping

At this stage it is proposed to retain the previous development controls on Crawley, Tathra and John Potts Drive Estates until the second phase of the DCP review.

This draft will be placed on an extended period of public exhibition from Friday, 27 November 2015 to Friday, 29 January 2016 due to the Christmas and school holiday period.

Recommendation:

Submitted for Councillors information.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 57 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

14[ADDES] NSW DISABILITY INCLUSION ACTION PLANNING GUIDELINES

Background

The Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (the Act) and the Disability Inclusion Regulation 2014 (the Regulation) commenced in NSW on 3 December 2014.

The Act replaced the Disability Services Act 1993.

The new Act has two main roles:

• Committing the NSW Government to making communities more inclusive and accessible for people with disability now and into the future. These commitments will continue even when the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is operating across NSW.

• Regulating specialist disability supports and services to people with disability in NSW and introducing better safeguards for these services until the change over to the NDIS.

The Act also requires NSW government departments, local councils and some other public authorities to develop and implement a Disability Inclusion Action Plan. For Council this Action Plan must be in place by June 2017.

The Action Plans must be consistent with the State Disability Inclusion Plan and include strategies to increase access and participation. In developing and reviewing their plans, public authorities must consult with people with disability.

The State Disability Inclusion Plan (State Plan) was launched by the Minister for Disability Services on the 26 February 2015.

The State plan has four focus areas that are aimed at creating long term change and require consistent efforts from government and the wider community.

The focus areas are:

1. Developing positive community attitudes and behaviours 2. Creating liveable communities 3. Supporting access to meaningful employment 4. Improving access to mainstream services through better systems and processes

The State Plan specifically identifies the role and responsibilities of Councils to engage with local communities to develop supporting actions.

Current situation

Council has received advice that the NSW Disability Inclusion Action Planning Guidelines (the Guidelines) have been released. The Guidelines establish the processes and matters to be considered in developing this plan. A copy is attached for Councillors information.

Council officers attended a workshop on 7 August 2015 in Wagga aimed at explaining the Guidelines and the process for developing the Action Plan.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 58 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT TO THE ORDINARY MEETING OF JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2015.

Recent advice from with Family and Community Services (FACS) at the end of September indicates that FACS is still working with Local Government NSW (LGNSW) to create a version specifically tailored to the needs of local Councils. FACS and LGNSW are also holding a forum in the near future, on integrating with council planning cycles.

Plan preparation, implementation and monitoring

The key expectations of the current Action Planning Guidelines are:

• a Disability Inclusion Action Planning working group to lead the development and implementation of the Action Plan

• this working group would meet quarterly

• promotion and co-ordination of actions under the Action Plan will be Council’s responsibility

• Disability Inclusion Action Plans will need to be reviewed every four years.

Council has been actively engaged in projects and programs to improve access across the local community. This includes a number of informal working groups to drive these projects.

In 2013 a report entitled “Disability planning across Local Government in NSW” prepared for Local Government NSW and Family and Community Services NSW identified that 48% of Councils in NSW have no plan relevant to people with disability (with the possible exception of their Community Strategic Plan). Furthermore only 53% of Councils have an access committee or equivalent advisory group.

This report refers to a number of NSW Council examples of approaches to co-ordination and planning for disabilities in the community. A rural example includes Bland Shire (population 5,862) who has established an Access Advisory Committee in 2000 as a sub-committee of the wider Community Services Advisory Committee. In addition to providing Council with advice on accessibility issues, this committee fosters positive attitudes towards disability. It organises celebrations for International Day of People with Disability; implements the Access Awards for community groups and businesses, and administers the Access Incentive Grant Scheme to facilitate accessibility measures by among local business.

Council may wish to give consideration to formalising an Access Advisory Committee to support Council in this process and take responsibility for developing and implementing the Action Plan.

Recommendations:

1. Council note the current status of the Disability Inclusion Action Planning process.

2. That Council consider the establishment of an Access Advisory Committee with the priority for this Committee to support Council in the development and integration of the Junee Shire Disability Inclusion Action Plan into Council’s planning processes.

______J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\GM's Ordinary Report to Council - 17 November 2015.doc Page 59 JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item No. Subject

1[GM] FIT FOR THE FUTURE

REPORT CARD IPART assessment of NSW council Fit for the Future proposals

The Independent Pricing and Regulatory IPART assessed the proposals against Tribunal (IPART) has recently provided the the following criteria: NSW Government with its report on the • Scale and capacity assessment of 139 Fit for the Future council • Financial criteria proposals (received from 144 councils). - Financial sustainability This report card provides a snapshot of - Infrastructure and service what IPART found. management - Efficiency

The IPART report clearly shows that the system of local government in NSW is broken.

60%Not fit 40%Fit

“Our (IPART’s) analysis and Sydney metro mergers could save close to the analysis undertaken by our independent economic consultants, Ernst & Young, indicated the merger option would provide large net benefits to the local communities.” $2billion *IPART 20-year NPV estimate using standardised assumptions Assessment of Council Fit for the Future Proposals - p2 based on council consultant business cases - p40

Sydney metropolitan councils: Regional councils: 71% Not fit 56%Not fit

This report card was produced by the Office of Local Government. The full IPART report can be found atwww.ipart.nsw.gov.au REPORT CARD - Key Findings

Merger benefits - up to Councils prefered rate $2 billion rises to merging IPART conducted additional analysis on Many councils proposed rate increases to business cases submitted by councils and improve financial performance. Some 32 estimate between $1.8 billion to $2.0 billion in councils proposed a rate rise to get fit with 15 NPV benefits could be realised over 20 years councils proposing rises above 30%. if mergers were to occur in Sydney. IPART’s estimate includes Government funding for IPART found that structural changes could implementation. achieve similar or larger improvements to Ernst & Young also estimates these mergers council’s income and reduce the need for rate could yield substantial financial gains with increases, limiting the impact of higher rates $1.3 billion in NPV benefits over 20 years. on the community.

Mergers bring other Almost two thirds of benefits councils are not fit IPART assessed 52 proposals as being fit for Other merger benefits include: the future, which represents just 37% of the • More effective and efficient service delivery. proposals received. • Improved delivery of major infrastructure. • More integrated strategic planning and policy development. • Enhanced economic growth. • More effective partnering with government. • Stronger advocacy for local communities.

Most councils did not provide merge proposals IPART received 139 proposals from 144 councils which included only four Merger Proposals (3% of total). The independent panel recommended mergers as the preferred option for 41% of councils. Many councils prepared business cases that showed mergers would benefit the community but chose not to proceed. REPORT CARD - Metro Key Findings

IPART assessment Council business cases IPART received 38 proposals from A number of councils commissioned business metropolitan councils, including two Merger cases of merger options including variations Proposals and 36 Council Improvement on structural changes identified by the Proposals (i.e. stand alone). Independent Panel on Local Government. IPART assessed 9 proposals as fit and 29 Some of these showed there could be proposals as not fit in Metropolitan Sydney. substantial benefits from merging. However, despite these potential gains, most Metropolitan Sydney councils did not submit a Merger Proposals Merger Proposal. Two Merger Proposals from metropolitan councils were received. These were assessed as fit because the mergers would deliver Financial criteria substantial benefits to their local communities IPART assessed three councils as not fit when compared to the councils standing because they did not demonstrate they met alone. financial criteria overall, however, IPART IPART still observed greater benefits would be identified strategies that should enable them realised from including neighbouring councils to become fit. in these mergers. City of Sydney Outer Metro Councils IPART noted that the City of Sydney received Six of the seven councils assessed by IPART the highest number of public submissions of as fit are in Outer Metropolitan Sydney. These any council, with the majority of submissions councils were assessed as fit because their supporting the council remaining a stand- proposals met scale and capacity and the alone council. financial criteria overall, and IPART analysis IPART however assessed the City of Sydney did not identify a merger alternative that was as not fit as it does not meet scale and better than remaining a stand-alone council. capacity criteria when compared to “Global City Council” attributes as identified by the Independent Panel on Local Government. Inner Metro councils With the exception of Bankstown, all Inner Metropolitan Sydney councils that submitted Joint Regional Authority a stand-alone proposal were assessed not fit, Hunter’s Hill, Lane Cove and Ryde Councils as they did not meet the scale and capacity submitted a proposal to share some services criterion. and centralise planning indicating benefits This means the assessment demonstrated the of $0.5m over five years or $3.4m if Mosman community would benefit from a merger. North Sydney and Willoughby were included. In contrast, IPART estimated a merger would save $280m over 20 years and therefore Merger benefits assessed the proposal as not fit. IPART’s analysis of councils’ own submissions suggests up to $2.0 billion in NPV benefits could be realised over 20 years if the Metropolitan Sydney mergers preferred by the Independent Local Government Review Panel occurred. REPORT CARD - Regional Key Findings

Merging delivers Mixed performance benefits 24 councils were unable to meet IPART’s financial benchmarks. IPART’s report shows mergers deliver significant benefits to participating councils, 43 councils did not reach the benchmark for including improving a council’s scale and scale and capacity. capacity, and financial outlook. Poor financial performance was generally a All regional mergers assessed by IPART were result of ongoing operating deficits through to found fit. 2019-20. All regional councils that had been provided a recommended merger option from the Independent Panel on Local Government Opportunity to be fit but opted to stand alone were unable to 27 of our regional councils that were found not demonstrate that this was the better option fit had a viable merger proposal that they did for their community. not act on. There is now an opportunity for these councils to reconsider the benefits of merging. 58 councils not fit 101 regional proposals were received (including 20 rural council proposals) covering 104 Rural Councils councils. IPART assessed 11 of the 20 rural council Only 43 proposals were assessed as fit for the proposals as not fit. These councils were either future. unable to meet the lower benchmarks or a Only two Merger Proposals were received – merge offered greater gains. Young Shire Council/Boorowa Council and Cootamundra Shire Council/ Harden Shire Council. Both mergers were assessed as fit for the future but IPART noted that a four way merger would deliver larger gains to the community.

Scale and capacity can be improved There were 34 regional councils assessed as having insufficient scale and capacity. In a number of cases these councils have declining or static populations, with population forecasts below 10,000 by 2031. A population of this size is likely to affect a councils efficiency and strategic capacity to meet the future needs of its community. REPORT CARD - Map of Fit / Not fit councils

* Cootamundra Shire and Harden

Far west not a part Shire merger of the assessment proposal due to the Far West Initiative. * Young Shire Council and Boorowa Council merger proposal

* Auburn, Burwood and City of Canada Bay merger proposal

KEY

Fit * Waverly and Randwick merger proposal Not fit

Fit as a merger option REPORT CARD - List of Fit / Not fit councils

Metro - Fit (x9)

Auburn, Burwood and City of Blue Mountains City Randwick and Waverley The Hills Shire Canada Bay (merger proposal) Camden (merger proposal) Wollondilly Shire Bankstown Penrith City Council Sutherland Shire

Metro – Not fit (x29)

Ashfield City Council Hornsby Shire Council Manly Council Strathfield Municipal Council Blacktown City Council Hunter’s Hill Council Marrickville Council Sydney City Council (as a Botany Bay Council Hurstville City Council Mosman Municipal Council Global City) Campbelltown City Council Kogarah City Council North Sydney Council Warringah Council Canterbury City Council Ku-ring-gai Council Parramatta City Council Willoughby City Council Fairfield City Council Lane Cove Council Pittwater Council Woollahra Municipal Council Hawkesbury City Council Leichhardt Municipal Council Rockdale City Council Holroyd City Council Liverpool City Council Ryde City Council

Regional - Fit (x43)

Albury City Council Cowra Shire Council Moree Plains Shire Council Upper Hunter Shire Council Ballina Shire Council Dubbo City Council Muswellbrook Shire Council Wagga Wagga City Council Bathurst Regional Council Eurobodalla Shire Council Nambucca Shire Council Wakool Shire Council* Bega Valley Shire Council Gilgandra Shire Council* Narrabri Shire Council Warren Shire Council* Bogan Shire Council* Glen Innes Severn Shire Parkes Shire Council Wingecarribee Shire Council Byron Shire Council Council Port Macquarie-Hastings Wollongong City Council Carrathool Shire Council* Great Lakes Shire Council Council Young Shire Council and Cessnock City Council Greater Hume Shire Council Port Stephens Council Boorowa Council (merger proposal) Coffs Harbour City Council Gunnedah Shire Council Richmond Valley Council Coolamon Shire Council* Inverell Shire Council Shoalhaven City Council Coonamble Shire Council* Leeton Shire Council Singleton Council Cootamundra Shire and Lismore City Council Tamworth Regional Council Harden Shire (merger proposal) Lockhart Shire Council* Tumbarumba Shire Council*

Regional – Not fit (x58)

Armidale Dumaresq Council Gosford City Council Lithgow City Council Temora Shire Council Bellingen Shire Council Goulburn Mulwaree Council Liverpool Plains Shire Council* Tenterfield Shire Council Berrigan Shire Council Greater Taree City Council Maitland City Council Tumut Shire Council Bland Shire Council Griffith City Council Mid-Western Regional Council Tweed Shire Council Blayney Shire Council Gundagai Shire Council* Murray Shire Council Upper Lachlan Shire Council Bombala Shire Council* Guyra Shire Council* Murrumbidgee Shire Council* Uralla Shire Council Cabonne Council Gwydir Shire Council Narrandera Shire Council Urana Shire Council* Clarence Valley Council Hay Shire Council* Narromine Shire Council Walcha Shire Council* Conargo Shire Council* Jerilderie Shire Council* Newcastle City Council Warrumbungle Shire Council Cooma-Monaro Shire Council Junee Shire Council Oberon Council Weddin Shire Council* Corowa Shire Council Kempsey Shire Council Orange City Council Wellington Council Deniliquin Shire Council Kiama Municipal Council Palerang Council Yass Valley Council Dungog Shire Council Kyogle Council Queanbeyan City Council Wyong City Forbes Shire Council Lachlan Shire Council Shellharbour City Council Gloucester Shire Council Lake Macquarie City Council Snowy River Shire Council

* Denotes Regional Council model REPORT CARD - IPART report key quotes

Mergers will bring Councils have resisted significant benefits to mergers, despite the community benefits

“All four Merger Proposals we received were “The merger option and the business case assessed as fit because they: for the merger commissioned by the council • Would deliver substantial benefits to their showed substantial gains. Despite this, most local communities when compared to the councils did not submit a Merger Proposal.” councils standing alone, and (p2) • Were generally the best available options for the relevant councils as neighbouring councils did not elect to join the Merger Councils in regional Proposals.” (p2) areas are struggling with declining populations “A merged entity would have greater scale and strategic capacity to better partner with and financial capacity other levels of government in providing key infrastructure and social services.” (p2) “…in non-metropolitan areas, a number of councils were assessed as not having sufficient “A merged entity could better integrate scale and capacity because the council’s planning and development, resulting in population is declining or static and is forecast improved planning decisions and enhanced to be below 10,000 by 2031. A population of economic growth.” (p2) this size would be likely to affect a council’s efficiency and strategic capacity to meet the future needs of its community.” (p3) “Our analysis and the analysis undertaken by our independent economic consultants, Ernst & Young, indicated the merger option “For both Metropolitan Sydney and non- would provide large net benefits to the local metropolitan councils, the main reason communities.” (p2) councils did not meet the financial criteria was generally because they forecast an operating deficit throughout the period.” (p3) “The efficiency improvements in the council’s proposal could be realised under the merger option, and the merger option could provide “If a Rural Council model is not adopted, significant further benefits to residents.” (p2) it is likely that most Rural Councils would be assessed as not meeting the scale and capacity criterion, and as a result, not fit.” “…our indicative analysis suggests $1.8 billion (p30) to $2.0 billion in NPV benefits could be realised over 20 years if the ILGRP’s preferred Metropolitan Sydney mergers occurred.” (p9) REPORT CARD - IPART report key quotes

Councils have put up Councils should consider rates rather than merge, voluntary mergers and this is not the best “…a voluntary merger would facilitate a faster option available progression towards achieving efficiencies when transitioning to a new council” (p47) “Whilst some councils may have been assessed as meeting the financial criteria and fit on the basis of assumed special variation rate increases, it does not mean this course of action is necessarily the best option for local communities under the current reform agenda.“ (p36)

“A large number of councils have proposed substantial future increases to general income to meet the financial criteria. There is a risk councils have proposed future SVs to improve their financial performance, and may not have fully considered whether alternative structures for the local government area, such as a merger, may be a better outcome.” (p37)

“Structural changes could achieve similar or larger improvements to a council’s general income and reduce the need for, and size of, potential SV increases, which could limit the impact of higher rates on the community. This was apparent during the assessment process.” (p37)

FACT SHEET – NEXT STEPS The final consultation opportunity for councils

After four years of partnership, the NSW Government is giving councils a final 30-day consultation opportunity to inform the Government’s position on local government reform and respond to the IPART findings

20 October 2015 Councils receive briefing from the Premier and Minister on the findings of the IPART assessment of council Fit for the Future proposals.

21 October 2015 Councils receive an invitation from the Secretary of the Department of Premier and Cabinet to provide feedback on the IPART report and indicate their merger preferences.

By 18 November Councils are encouraged to review IPART’s assessment of their Fit for the Future submission and respond. The assessment is available on the IPART website www.ipart.nsw.gov.au. Councils should provide feedback using the online portal on the Department of Premier and Cabinet’s website, which will be available shortly. For councils that are assessed as being not fit due to scale and capacity, or who neighbour a council that was not fit due to scale and capacity, the Government would also like to know, through the online portal, the merger preferences of these councils. Funding is available for mergers agreed to by councils and the NSW Government.

By end 2015 The Government will consider responses from councils, decide on next steps and inform councils and the community.

STRONGER COMMUNITIES FUND Funding for councils and communities

Newly created councils and their communities will receive up to $25 million

A Stronger Communities Fund of up to $15 million is available, providing new councils a head start on community infrastructure projects like sporting fields, libraries, or parks Additional funding of up to $10 million will be provided to ensure ratepayers do not fund the up-front costs of merging

Councils have until 18 November 2015 to put forward their merger preferences and be eligible for funding Funding will be available for council mergers that are supported by merging partners, supported by the Government and submitted to the Department of Premier and Cabinet by 18 November 2015

Fund Metro Sydney* Regional

$10 million $5 million

OR OR Stronger Communities Fund

$15 million if three or more $10 million if three or more councils merging councils merging

Merger Implementation Grant $10 million $5 million

*Includes Newcastle, Wollongong and surrounds. JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item Subject No. 3[ADCCS] REVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS TO 30 JUNE 2015 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Income Statement for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Budget 1 Actual Actual 2015 $ '000 Notes 2015 2014

Income from Continuing Operations Revenue: 4,281 Rates & Annual Charges 3a 4,310 4,197 2,873 User Charges & Fees 3b 3,362 2,999 167 Interest & Investment Revenue 3c 120 144 373 Other Revenues 3d 443 504 4,477 Grants & Contributions provided for Operating Purposes 3e,f 4,690 3,369 2 26 Grants & Contributions provided for Capital Purposes 3e,f 562 1,131 Other Income: 6 Net gains from the disposal of assets 5 199 74 Net Share of interests in Joint Ventures & - Associates using the equity method 19 - -

12,203 Total Income from Continuing Operations 13,686 12,418

Expenses from Continuing Operations 4,199 Employee Benefits & On-Costs 4a 4,020 4,416 457 Borrowing Costs 4b 440 443 4,713 Materials & Contracts 4c 5,226 4,657 2,189 Depreciation & Amortisation 4d 2,137 2,020 - Impairment 4d - - 750 Other Expenses 4e 1,289 1,322

12,308 Total Expenses from Continuing Operations 13,112 12,858

(105) Operating Result from Continuing Operations 574 (440)

Discontinued Operations

- Net Profit/(Loss) from Discontinued Operations 24 - -

(105) Net Operating Result for the Year 574 (440)

(105) Net Operating Result attributable to Council 574 (440) - Net Operating Result attributable to Non-controlling Interests - -

Net Operating Result for the year before Grants and (131) Contributions provided for Capital Purposes 12 (1,571)

1 Original Budget as approved by Council - refer Note 16

This Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes. page 4 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Statement of Comprehensive Income for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Actual Actual $ '000 Notes 2015 2014

Net Operating Result for the year (as per Income statement) 574 (440)

Other Comprehensive Income:

Amounts which will not be reclassified subsequently to the Operating Result Gain (loss) on revaluation of I,PP&E 20b (ii) 823 294 Total Items which will not be reclassified subsequently to the Operating Result 823 294

Amounts which will be reclassified subsequently to the Operating Result when specific conditions are met Nil

Total Other Comprehensive Income for the year 823 294

Total Comprehensive Income for the Year 1,397 (146)

Total Comprehensive Income attributable to Council 1,397 (146) Total Comprehensive Income attributable to Non-controlling Interests - -

This Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes. page 5 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2015

Actual Actual $ '000 Notes 2015 2014

ASSETS Current Assets Cash & Cash Equivalents 6a 2,335 2,050 Investments 6b - - Receivables 7 1,059 1,819 Inventories 8 884 736 Other 8 - 274 Non-current assets classified as "held for sale" 22 - - Total Current Assets 4,278 4,879

Non-Current Assets Investments 6b - - Receivables 7 169 156 Inventories 8 1,698 1,408 Infrastructure, Property, Plant & Equipment 9 137,009 134,639 Investments accounted for using the equity method 19 - - Investment Property 14 - - Intangible Assets 25 - - Total Non-Current Assets 138,876 136,203 TOTAL ASSETS 143,154 141,082

LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Payables 10 916 1,452 Borrowings 10 435 259 Provisions 10 1,665 1,707 Total Current Liabilities 3,016 3,418

Non-Current Liabilities Payables 10 37 37 Borrowings 10 8,002 6,928 Provisions 10 21 18 Total Non-Current Liabilities 8,060 6,983 TOTAL LIABILITIES 11,076 10,401 Net Assets 132,078 130,681

EQUITY Retained Earnings 20 77,491 76,917 Revaluation Reserves 20 54,587 53,764 Council Equity Interest 132,078 130,681 Non-controlling Equity Interests - - Total Equity 132,078 130,681

This Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes. page 6 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Statement of Changes in Equity for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Non- Retained Reserves Council controlling Total $ '000 Notes Earnings (Refer 20b) Interest Interest Equity

2015 Opening Balance (as per Last Year's Audited Accounts) 76,917 53,764 130,681 - 130,681 a. Correction of Prior Period Errors 20 (c) - - - - - b. Changes in Accounting Policies (prior year effects) 20 (d) - - - - - Revised Opening Balance (as at 1/7/14) 76,917 53,764 130,681 - 130,681 c. Net Operating Result for the Year 574 - 574 - 574 d. Other Comprehensive Income - Revaluations : IPP&E Asset Revaluation Rsve 20b (ii) - 823 823 - 823 - Revaluations: Other Reserves 20b (ii) ------Transfers to Income Statement 20b (ii) ------Impairment (loss) reversal relating to I,PP&E 20b (ii) ------Other Reserves Movements 20b (ii) - - - - - Other Comprehensive Income - 823 823 - 823

Total Comprehensive Income (c&d) 574 823 1,397 - 1,397 e. Distributions to/(Contributions from) Non-controlling Interests - - - - - f. Transfers between Equity - - - - -

Equity - Balance at end of the reporting period 77,491 54,587 132,078 - 132,078

Non- Retained Reserves Council controlling Total $ '000 Notes Earnings (Refer 20b) Interest Interest Equity

2014 Opening Balance (as per Last Year's Audited Accounts) 77,357 53,470 130,827 - 130,827 a. Correction of Prior Period Errors 20 (c) - - - - - b. Changes in Accounting Policies (prior year effects) 20 (d) - - - - - Revised Opening Balance (as at 1/7/13) 77,357 53,470 130,827 - 130,827 c. Net Operating Result for the Year (440) - (440) - (440) d. Other Comprehensive Income - Revaluations : IPP&E Asset Revaluation Rsve 20b (ii) - 294 294 - 294 - Revaluations: Other Reserves 20b (ii) ------Transfers to Income Statement 20b (ii) ------Impairment (loss) reversal relating to I,PP&E 20b (ii) ------Other Reserves Movements 20b (ii) - - - - - Other Comprehensive Income - 294 294 - 294

Total Comprehensive Income (c&d) (440) 294 (146) - (146) e. Distributions to/(Contributions from) Non-controlling Interests - - - - - f. Transfers between Equity - - - - -

Equity - Balance at end of the reporting period 76,917 53,764 130,681 - 130,681

This Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes. page 7 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Statement of Cash Flows for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Budget Actual Actual 2015 $ '000 Notes 2015 2014

Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts: 4,281 Rates & Annual Charges 4,343 4,200 2,873 User Charges & Fees 3,318 3,468 167 Investment & Interest Revenue Received 122 105 4,502 Grants & Contributions 5,719 4,278 373 Bonds, Deposits & Retention amounts received 42 - - Other 741 693 Payments: (4,199) Employee Benefits & On-Costs (4,147) (4,255) (4,667) Materials & Contracts (5,470) (4,954) (451) Borrowing Costs (450) (421) (750) Other (1,134) (1,521) 2,129 Net Cash provided (or used in) Operating Activities 11b 3,084 1,593

Cash Flows from Investing Activities Receipts: 496 Sale of Real Estate Assets 767 330 599 Sale of Infrastructure, Property, Plant & Equipment 276 296 - Deferred Debtors Receipts - 4 Payments: (4,031) Purchase of Infrastructure, Property, Plant & Equipment (4,316) (3,119) (625) Purchase of Real Estate Assets (777) (197) - Deferred Debtors & Advances Made 1 - (3,561) Net Cash provided (or used in) Investing Activities (4,049) (2,686)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities Receipts: 1,540 Proceeds from Borrowings & Advances 1,540 - Payments: (337) Repayment of Borrowings & Advances (290) - 1,203 Net Cash Flow provided (used in) Financing Activities 1,250 -

(229) Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash & Cash Equivalents 285 (1,093)

1,976 plus: Cash & Cash Equivalents - beginning of year 11a 2,050 3,143

1,747 Cash & Cash Equivalents - end of the year 11a 2,335 2,050

Additional Information:

plus: Investments on hand - end of year 6b - -

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents & Investments 2,335 2,050

Please refer to Note 11 for additional cash flow information This Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notes. page 8 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Notes to the Financial Statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Note 6a. - Cash Assets and Note 6b. - Investments

2015 2015 2014 2014 Actual Actual Actual Actual $ '000 Notes Current Non Current Current Non Current

Cash & Cash Equivalents (Note 6a) Cash on Hand and at Bank 35 - 832 - Cash-Equivalent Assets 1 - Short Term Deposits 2,300 - 1,218 - Total Cash & Cash Equivalents 2,335 - 2,050 -

Investments (Note 6b) Nil TOTAL CASH ASSETS, CASH EQUIVALENTS & INVESTMENTS 2,335 - 2,050 -

1 Those Investments where time to maturity (from date of purchase) is < 3 mths.

Cash, Cash Equivalents & Investments were classified at year end in accordance with AASB 139 as follows:

Cash & Cash Equivalents a. "At Fair Value through the Profit & Loss" 2,335 - 2,050 -

Investments Nil

page 37 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Notes to the Financial Statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Note 6c. Restricted Cash, Cash Equivalents & Investments - Details

2015 2015 2014 2014 Actual Actual Actual Actual $ '000 Current Non Current Current Non Current

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments 2,335 - 2,050 - attributable to: External Restrictions (refer below) 2,301 - 2,007 - Internal Restrictions (refer below) 32 - - - Unrestricted 2 - 43 - 2,335 - 2,050 -

2015 Opening Transfers to Transfers from Closing $ '000 Balance Restrictions Restrictions Balance

Details of Restrictions

External Restrictions - Included in Liabilities Nil

External Restrictions - Other Specific Purpose Unexpended Grants (B) 109 50 - 159 Sewerage Services (C) 1,757 244 - 2,001 Domestic Waste Management (C) 121 - - 121 Other 20 - - 20 External Restrictions - Other 2,007 294 - 2,301 Total External Restrictions 2,007 294 - 2,301

Internal Restrictions Deposits, Retentions & Bonds - 32 - 32 Total Internal Restrictions - 32 - 32

TOTAL RESTRICTIONS 2,007 326 - 2,333

B Grants which are not yet expended for the purposes for which the grants were obtained. (refer Note 1) C Water, Sewerage, Domestic Waste Management (DWM) & other Special Rates/Levies/Charges are externally restricted assets and must be applied for the purposes for which they were raised. D Internal Restrictions of $422K reside in Note 7 Receivables. They are Reserves for ELE $205K, Gravel Pit Restoration $27K, Vehicle Replacement $132K, Junee Historical Society $30K & Carry Over Works $28K.

page 38 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Notes to the Financial Statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Note 13a(i). Statement of Performance Measurement - Indicators (Consolidated)

Amounts Indicator Prior Periods $ '000 2015 2015 2014 2013

Local Government Industry Indicators - Consolidated

1. Operating Performance Ratio Total continuing operating revenue (1) (excl. Capital Grants & Contributions) - Operating Expenses (187) -1.45% -14.67% -3.83% Total continuing operating revenue (1) 12,925 (excl. Capital Grants & Contributions)

2. Own Source Operating Revenue Ratio Total continuing operating revenue (1) (excl. ALL Grants & Contributions) 8,235 61.06% 63.55% 55.32% Total continuing operating revenue (1) 13,487

3. Unrestricted Current Ratio Current Assets less all External Restrictions (2) 1,886 (3, 4) 0.97x 1.22 2.60 Current Liabilities less Specific Purpose Liabilities 1,944

4. Debt Service Cover Ratio Operating Result (1) before capital excluding interest and depreciation / impairment / amortisation 2,390 3.27x 1.85 3.24 Principal Repayments (from the Statement of Cash Flows) 730 + Borrowing Costs (from the Income Statement)

5. Rates, Annual Charges, Interest & Extra Charges Outstanding Percentage Rates, Annual and Extra Charges Outstanding 438 9.03% 10.20% 10.61% Rates, Annual and Extra Charges Collectible 4,849

6. Cash Expense Cover Ratio Current Year's Cash and Cash Equivalents + All Term Deposits 2,335 x12 2.44 mths 2.21 3.32 Payments from cash flow of operating and 958 financing activities

Notes (1) Excludes fair value adjustments and reversal of revaluation decrements, net gain/(loss) on sale of assets and the net share of interests in joint ventures & associates. (2) Refer Notes 6-8 inclusive. Also excludes any real estate & land for resale not expected to be sold in the next 12 months (3) Refer to Note 10(a). (4) Refer to Note 10(a)(ii) - excludes all payables & provisions not expected to be paid in the next 12 months (incl. ELE).

page 47 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Notes to the Financial Statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Note 13a(ii). Local Government Industry Indicators - Graphs (Consolidated)

Commentary on 2014/15 Result 1. Operating Performance Ratio Purpose of Operating Performance Ratio 2014/15 Ratio -1.45% 2.0% 2.75%

2012 2013 2014 2015 -3.0% -1.45% This ratio measures Council's overall operating performance, -3.83%

Ratio % Council’s whilst still below the benchmark, is an -8.0% -14.67% achievement of improvement on last year. Council will containing operating need to address funding shortfalls or expenditure within contain expenditure within existing revenue -13.0% operating revenue. streams to address this in the future.

-18.0%

Benchmark: ――― Minimum >=0.00% CouRatio is within Benchmark Source for Benchmark: Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting #23 Ratio is outside Benchmark

Commentary on 2014/15 Result 2. Own Source Operating Revenue Ratio Purpose of Own 100% Source Operating 2014/15 Ratio 61.06% 90% Revenue Ratio 80%

70% 60% This ratio measures 50% fiscal flexibility. It is Council's own source revenue is meeting Ratio % the degree of reliance 40% the industry benchmark. This ratio will on external funding 30% 63.55% 61.06% 54.29% 55.32% sources such as fluctuate from year to year as a result of 20% operating grants & changes in grant and contributions funding. 10% contributions. 0% 2012 2013 2014 2015

Benchmark: ――― Minimum >=60.00% Ratio is within Benchmark Source for Benchmark: Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting #23 Ratio is outside Benchmark

Commentary on 2014/15 Result 3. Unrestricted Current Ratio Purpose of 3.5 Unrestricted Current Ratio 2014/15 Ratio 0.97x 3.0

2.5

2.0 To assess the adequacy of working

Ratio (x) 1.5 capital and its ability 2.89 This ratio, whilst positive, is below the 2.60 to satisfy obligations 1.0 in the short term for industry standard. 1.22 the unrestricted 0.5 0.97 activities of Council. 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015

Benchmark: ――― Minimum >=1.50 Ratio is within Benchmark Source for Benchmark: Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting #23 Ratio is outside Benchmark

page 48 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Notes to the Financial Statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Note 13a(ii). Local Government Industry Indicators - Graphs (Consolidated)

4. Debt Service Cover Ratio Commentary on 2014/15 Result Purpose of Debt Service Cover Ratio 5.0 2014/15 Ratio 3.27x

4.0

3.0 This ratio measures the availability of Ratio (x) 4.62 2.0 operating cash to This result indicates continued capacity to 3.24 3.27 service debt including repay debt. interest, principal and 1.0 1.85 lease payments

0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015

Benchmark: ――― Minimum >=2.00 Ratio is within Benchmark Source for Benchmark: Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting #23 Ratio is outside Benchmark

5. Rates, Annual Charges, Interest & Extra Commentary on 2014/15 Result Charges Outstanding Percentage Purpose of Rates & 12% Annual Charges Outstanding Ratio 2014/15 Ratio 9.03% 10%

8% This outstanding ratio sits higher than To assess the impact Council is comfortable with. Council 6% commenced, in the second half of Ratio % of uncollected rates 10.61% 10.20% 9.03% 9.03% and annual charges 2013/2014 financial year, with actively 4% on Council's liquidity increased debt recovery in line with a new and the adequacy of 2% Debt Recovery Policy. This has shown an recovery efforts. improvement in 2014/2015 and will 0% continue into the future. 2012 2013 2014 2015

Benchmark: ――― Maximum <10.00% Ratio is within Benchmark Source for Benchmark: Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting #23 Ratio is outside Benchmark

Commentary on 2014/15 Result 6. Cash Expense Cover Ratio Purpose of Cash 4.0 Expense Cover Ratio 2014/15 Ratio 2.44 mths 3.5

3.0

2.5 This liquidity ratio 2.0 indicates the number This ratio is lower than the benchmark. 3.32 of months a Council The recent Special Rate Variations that 1.5 2.98 can continue paying have been approved and modelled in Ratio (mths) 2.44 1.0 2.21 for its immediate Council's Long Term Financial Plan will expenses without 0.5 improve this ratio into the future. additional cash inflow. 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015

Benchmark: ――― Minimum >=3.00 Ratio is within Benchmark Source for Benchmark: Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting #23 Ratio is outside Benchmark

page 49 Financial Statements 2015

Junee Shire Council

Notes to the Financial Statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2015

Note 28. Financial Review

$ '000

Key Financial Figures of Council over the past 5 years (consolidated)

Financial Performance Figures 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

Inflows: Rates & Annual Charges Revenue 4,310 4,197 3,910 3,754 3,629 User Charges Revenue 3,362 2,999 2,658 3,128 2,818 Interest & Investment Revenue (Losses) 120 144 151 213 187 Grants Income - Operating & Capital 4,800 4,339 5,648 5,871 4,925 Total Income from Continuing Operations 13,686 12,418 13,007 14,037 12,827

Sale Proceeds from I,PP&E 1,043 626 1,577 509 467 New Loan Borrowings & Advances 1,540 - - - 422

Outflows: Employee Benefits & On-cost Expenses 4,020 4,416 4,149 4,108 4,166 Borrowing Costs 440 443 430 367 344 Materials & Contracts Expenses 5,226 4,657 4,330 4,785 3,716 Total Expenses from Continuing Operations 13,112 12,858 12,397 12,693 11,547

Total Cash purchases of I,PP&E 4,316 3,119 4,239 3,314 3,323 Total Loan Repayments (incl. Finance Leases) 290 - 163 250 254

Operating Surplus/(Deficit) (excl. Capital Income) 12 (1,571) (604) 461 380

Financial Position Figures 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

Current Assets 4,278 4,879 5,467 5,757 5,437 Current Liabilities 3,016 3,418 2,541 2,480 2,436 Net Current Assets 1,262 1,461 2,926 3,277 3,001

Available Working Capital 480 827 761 1,281 918 (Unrestricted Net Current Assets)

Cash & Investments - Unrestricted 2 43 40 309 13 Cash & Investments - Internal Restrictions 32 - 1,342 1,019 2,312 Cash & Investments - Total 2,335 2,050 3,143 2,865 3,709

Total Borrowings Outstanding 8,437 7,187 7,187 7,350 7,600 (Loans, Advances & Finance Leases)

Total Value of I,PP&E (excl. Land & Earthworks) 128,423 126,461 124,287 119,142 116,862 Total Accumulated Depreciation 41,978 40,896 39,492 38,377 40,905 Indicative Remaining Useful Life (as a % of GBV) 67% 68% 68% 68% 65%

Source: Published audited financial statements of Council (current year & prior year)

page 77 JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item No. Subject

4[ADCCS] QUARTERLY BUDGET

Junee Shire Council

Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Income & Expenses (Consolidated) Recommended PROJECTED ORIGINAL Approved Changes changes year end Budget Sept Dec REVISED for Council Result 2015/16 Review Review Budget Resolution 2015/16 Income Rates and Annual Charges 4,613,933 0 0 4,613,933 0 4,613,933 User Charges and Fees 2,678,633 0 0 2,678,633 0 2,678,633 Interest and Investment Revenue 127,000 0 0 127,000 0 127,000 Other Revenues 361,335 0 0 361,335 0 361,335 Grants & Contributions - Operating 5,013,601 0 0 5,013,601 334,416 5,348,017 Grants and Contributions - Capital 1,249,137 0 0 1,249,137 21,884 1,271,021 Net gain from the disposal of assets 63,772 0 0 63,772 0 63,772

Total Income from continuing operations 14,107,411 0 0 14,107,411 356,300 14,463,711 Expenses Employee costs 4,402,563 0 0 4,402,563 0 4,402,563 Borrowing Costs 478,880 0 0 478,880 0 478,880 Materials & Contracts 4,081,942 0 0 4,081,942 162,046 4,243,988 Depreciation 2,221,720 0 0 2,221,720 0 2,221,720 Legal Costs Consultants Other Expenses 1,231,181 0 0 1,231,181 0 1,231,181 Net Loss from Disposal of Assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenses from continuing operations 12,416,286 0 0 12,416,286 162,046 12,578,332 Net Operating Result from continuing operations 1,691,125 0 0 1,691,125 194,254 1,885,379 Net Operating Result before capital items 441,988 0 0 441,988 172,370 614,358 Notes: ORIGINAL Budget +/- approved budget changes in previous quarters = REVISED Budget REVISED Budget +/- recommended changes this quarter = PROJECTED year end result Recommended changes to revised budget A number of items - eg. cleaning expenses - are shown as Materials & Contracts for budgetted figures but in Other Expenses in the Actual figures. Please note that income and expenditure items are often not raised or invoiced to JSC month by month but annually at the beginning of the financial year. Eg. Rates & Annual Charges, Insurance Costs.

This document forms part of Junee Shire Council's Quarterly Budget Review Statement for the quarter ended 30/09/2015 and should be read in conjunction with other documents in the QBRS.

Page 1 of 60 Junee Shire Council

Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Income & Expenses (by Department & Service Area) Recommended PROJECTED ORIGINAL Approved Changes changes year end Budget Sept Dec REVISED for Council Result 2015/16 Review Review Budget Resolution 2015/16 Income Executive Services 1.1 Governance & General Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.2 Fire Control Services 65,769 0 0 65,769 0 65,769 1.3 Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corporate & Community Services 2.1 Finance 6,197,263 0 0 6,197,263 (18,884) 6,178,379 2.2 Corporate Services 156,014 0 0 156,014 0 156,014 2.3 Community Development 46,330 0 0 46,330 0 46,330 2.4 Family Day Care 853,505 0 0 853,505 0 853,505 2.5 Community Transport 154,240 0 0 154,240 0 154,240 2.6 Public Library 35,004 0 0 35,004 0 35,004 2.7 Recreation Centre 282,500 0 0 282,500 0 282,500 2.8 Public Halls and Buildings 1,200 0 0 1,200 0 1,200 Development & Environmental Services 3.1 Noxious Plant Control 49,921 0 0 49,921 0 49,921 3.2 Animal Control & LG Regulations 11,139 0 0 11,139 0 11,139 3.3 Property Management 7,480 0 0 7,480 0 7,480 3.4 Town Planning & Building Control 132,066 0 0 132,066 0 132,066 Engineering Services 4.1 Engineering Infrastructure 11,300 0 0 11,300 0 11,300 4.2 Operational Services Provision 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 5,000 4.3 Plant & Equipment 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 4.4 Public Cemeteries 81,575 0 0 81,575 0 81,575 4.5 Public Conveniences 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 Garbage 737,214 0 0 737,214 0 737,214 4.7 Sewerage 746,942 0 0 746,942 0 746,942 4.8 Sporting Grounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.9 Parks and Gardens 25,515 0 0 25,515 0 25,515 4.10 Urban Sealed & Unsealed Roads 200,000 0 0 200,000 111,368 311,368 4.11 Rural Sealed Roads 2,192,093 0 0 2,192,093 263,816 2,455,909 4.12 Rural Unsealed Roads 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.13 Drainage Infrastructure 43,569 0 0 43,569 0 43,569 4.14 Street Lighting 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.15 RTA Works 1,650,000 0 0 1,650,000 0 1,650,000 4.16 Property Development 141,772 0 0 141,772 0 141,772 4.17 Private Works 250,000 0 0 250,000 0 250,000 Total Income 14,107,411 0 0 14,107,411 356,300 14,463,711

Page 2 of 60 Junee Shire Council

Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Income & Expenses (by Department & Service Area) Recommended PROJECTED ORIGINAL Approved Changes changes year end Budget Sept Dec REVISED for Council Result 2015/16 Review Review Budget Resolution 2015/16 Expenses Executive Services 1.1 Governance & General Manager 632,162 0 0 632,162 28,000 660,162 1.2 Fire Control Services 163,077 0 0 163,077 0 163,077 1.3 Economic Development 75,324 0 0 75,324 0 75,324 Corporate & Community Services 2.1 Finance 29,000 0 0 29,000 0 29,000 2.2 Corporate Services 1,386,243 0 0 1,386,243 25,000 1,411,243 2.3 Community Development 110,457 0 0 110,457 0 110,457 2.4 Family Day Care 857,339 0 0 857,339 0 857,339 2.5 Community Transport 170,393 0 0 170,393 0 170,393 2.6 Public Library 378,726 0 0 378,726 0 378,726 2.7 Recreation Centre 1,020,970 0 0 1,020,970 6,307 1,027,277 2.8 Public Halls and Buildings 64,838 0 0 64,838 10,500 75,338 Development & Environmental Services 3.1 Noxious Plant Control 102,789 0 0 102,789 0 102,789 3.2 Animal Control & LG Regulations 29,825 0 0 29,825 0 29,825 3.3 Property Management 227,318 0 0 227,318 10,000 237,318 3.4 Town Planning & Building Control 339,558 0 0 339,558 20,145 359,703 Engineering Services 4.1 Engineering Infrastructure 261,343 0 0 261,343 0 261,343 4.2 Operational Services Provision 20,226 0 0 20,226 0 20,226 4.3 Plant & Equipment 187,635 0 0 187,635 0 187,635 4.4 Public Cemeteries 112,095 0 0 112,095 0 112,095 4.5 Public Conveniences 59,000 0 0 59,000 0 59,000 4.7 Sewerage 788,521 0 0 788,521 0 788,521 4.6 Garbage 717,088 0 0 717,088 717,088 4.8 Sporting Grounds 172,945 0 0 172,945 0 172,945 4.9 Parks and Gardens 319,743 0 0 319,743 0 319,743 4.10 Urban Sealed & Unsealed Roads 736,091 0 0 736,091 0 736,091 4.11 Rural Sealed Roads 1,054,629 0 0 1,054,629 62,094 1,116,723 4.12 Rural Unsealed Roads 532,746 0 0 532,746 0 532,746 4.13 Drainage Infrastructure 45,717 0 0 45,717 0 45,717 4.14 Street Lighting 81,500 0 0 81,500 0 81,500 4.15 RTA Works 1,400,000 0 0 1,400,000 0 1,400,000 4.16 Property Development 158,988 0 0 158,988 0 158,988 4.17 Private Works 180,000 0 0 180,000 0 180,000 Total Expenses 12,416,286 0 0 12,416,286 162,046 12,578,332

Notes: ORIGINAL Budget +/- approved budget changes in previous quarters = REVISED Budget REVISED Budget +/- recommended changes this quarter = PROJECTED year end result

This document forms part of Junee Shire Council's Quarterly Budget Review Statement for the quarter ended 30/09/2015 and should be read in conjunction with other documents in the QBRS.

Page 3 of 60 Junee Shire Council Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Cash & Investments Recommended PROJECTED ORIGINAL Approved Changes changes year end Budget Sept Dec REVISED for Council Result 2015/16 Review Review Budget Resolution 2015/16 Unrestricted 23,087 0 0 23,087 (412,453) (389,366) Externally restricted

Sewerage Services 1,914,358 0 0 1,914,358 (274,696) 1,639,662 Domestic Waste Management 50,845 0 0 50,845 10,000 60,845 Special purpose grants 150,000 0 0 150,000 0 150,000 Unexpended loans 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crown Reserves Trust 26,053 0 0 26,053 0 26,053 Developer Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Externally restricted 2,141,256 0 0 2,141,256 (264,696) 1,876,560 Internally restricted

Family Day Care (81,739) 0 0 (81,739) 0 (81,739) Employee Leave Entitlements 173,746 0 0 173,746 0 173,746 Gravel Pit Restoration 26,848 0 0 26,848 0 26,848 Community Transport Program 132,103 0 0 132,103 0 132,103 Junee Historical Society 29,823 0 0 29,823 (10,500) 19,323

Total Internally restricted 280,781 0 0 280,781 (10,500) 270,281 Total Restricted 2,422,037 0 0 2,422,037 (275,196) 2,146,841 Total cash and investments 2,445,124 0 0 2,445,124 (687,649) 1,757,475

Available cash 23,087 0 0 23,087 (412,453) (389,366)

Notes: The available cash position excludes restricted funds. External restrictions are funds that must be spent for a specific purpose and cannot be used by council for general operations. Internal restrictions are funds that council has determined will be used for a specific future purpose.

ORIGINAL Budget +/- approved budget changes in previous quarters = REVISED Budget REVISED Budget +/- recommended changes this quarter = PROJECTED year end result Comment on cash and investments position

The cash position estimated at 30 June 2015 has decreased for two primary reasons outside of budget adjustments:- 1. The estimated opening cash balance was $412K lower then estimated. 2. The balance of debtors at 30 June 2015 has been lowered by $700K based on prior years history. 3. The balance of payables at 30 June 2015 has been lowered by $300K based on prior years history.

Page 4 of 60 Junee Shire Council

Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Capital Budget (at same level of reporting as for Income & Expenses Statement) Recommended PROJECTED ORIGINAL Approved Changes changes year end Budget Sept Dec REVISED for Council Result 2015/16 Review Review Budget Resolution 2015/16 Capital Funding Rates and other untied funding 1,920,584 0 1,920,584 634,016 2,554,600 Capital Grants & Contributions 1,249,137 0 0 1,249,137 21,884 1,271,021 Internal Restrictions - Family Day Care Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Community Transport Reserve 59,000 0 0 59,000 0 59,000 - RFS Plant & Equipment Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0 External Restrictions - Unspent Grants 0 0 0 0 6,307 6,307 - Sewerage Fund 145,000 0 0 145,000 274,696 419,696 - Domestic Waste Management 110,008 0 0 110,008 (10,000) 100,008 - Crown Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Developer Contributions S.94A 40,000 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 Other Capital Funding Sources - loans 350,000 0 0 350,000 0 350,000 Income from sale of assets - Plant and Equipment 246,000 0 0 246,000 0 246,000 - Land and Buildings 700,000 0 0 700,000 0 700,000 - Land Development 627,189 0 0 627,189 0 627,189 Total Capital Funding 5,446,918 0 0 5,446,918 926,903 6,373,821

Capital Expenditure

New Assets - Plant and Equipment 402,908 0 0 402,908 81,323 484,231

- Land and Buildings 3,500 0 0 3,500 0 3,500 - Roads, Bridges, Footpaths 40,000 0 0 40,000 37,400 77,400 - Sewer Network 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 - Land Development 92,300 0 0 92,300 45,000 137,300

Renewals (Replacement) - Plant and Equipment 668,000 0 0 668,000 82,000 750,000 - Land and Buildings 72,700 0 0 72,700 50,000 122,700 - Roads, Bridges, Footpaths 3,587,217 0 0 3,587,217 356,484 3,943,701 - Sewer Network 145,000 0 0 145,000 224,696 369,696 Loan Repayments (principal) 435,293 0 0 435,293 0 435,293 Total Capital Expenditure 5,446,918 0 0 5,446,918 926,903 6,373,821

Where Total Capital Funding and Total Capital Expenditure figures do not match, an explanation is to be given. Carry over funding from the previous year should be identified and any proposed carry over to next financial year explained.

Notes: ORIGINAL Budget +/- approved budget changes in previous quarters = REVISED Budget REVISED Budget +/- recommended changes this quarter = PROJECTED year end result

This document forms part of Junee Shire Council's Quarterly Budget Review Statement for the quarter ended 30/09/2015 and should be read in conjunction with other documents in the QBRS. Page 5 of 60 Junee Shire Council

Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Capital Expenditure Budget (at same level of reporting as for Income & Expenses Statement) Recommended PROJECTED ORIGINAL Approved Changes changes year end Budget Sept Dec REVISED for Council Result 2015/16 Review Review Budget Resolution 2015/16 (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's)

Capital Expenditure

General Manager 1.1 Governance & General Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.2 Fire Control Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corporate & Community Services 2.1 Finance 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 Corporate Services 39,000 0 0 39,000 0 39,000 2.3 Community Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.4 Family Day Care 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 Community Transport 118,000 0 0 118,000 0 118,000 2.6 Public Library 5,600 0 0 5,600 10,955 16,555 2.7 Recreation Centre 426,000 0 0 426,000 70,368 496,368 2.8 Public Halls and Buildings 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 Development & Environmental Services 3.1 Noxious Plant Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 Animal Control & LG Regulations 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 Property Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 Town Planning & Building Control 0 0 0 0 77,500 77,500 Engineering Services 4.1 Engineering Infrastructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.2 Operational Services Provision 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 Plant & Equipment 32,926 0 0 32,926 0 32,926 4.4 Public Cemeteries 425,000 0 0 425,000 0 425,000 4.5 Public Conveniences 3,500 0 0 3,500 0 3,500 4.6 Garbage 110,008 0 0 110,008 (10,000) 100,008 4.7 Sewerage 145,000 0 0 145,000 274,696 419,696 4.8 Sporting Grounds 10,000 0 0 10,000 7,500 17,500 4.9 Parks and Gardens 10,000 0 0 10,000 7,000 17,000 4.10 Urban Sealed & Unsealed Roads 505,308 0 0 505,308 130,068 635,376 4.11 Rural Sealed Roads 2,728,379 0 0 2,728,379 263,816 2,992,195 4.12 Rural Unsealed Roads 320,604 0 0 320,604 0 320,604 4.13 Drainage Infrastructure 40,000 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 4.14 Street Lighting 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.15 RTA Works 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.16 Property Development 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 4.17 Private Works 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Acquisition of Assets 4,919,325 0 0 4,919,325 926,903 5,801,228 Plus Development of Real Estate 137,300 0 0 137,300 0 137,300 Plus Loan Repayments 435,293 0 0 435,293 0 435,293 Total Capital Expenditure 5,491,918 0 0 5,491,918 926,903 6,373,821

Notes:

ORIGINAL Budget +/- approved budget changes in previous quarters = REVISED Budget REVISED Budget +/- recommended changes this quarter = PROJECTED year end result

This document forms part of Junee Shire Council's Quarterly Budget Review Statement for the quarter ended 30/09/2015 and should be read in conjunction with other documents in the QBRS.

Page 6 of 60 PART A - Contracts Listing Junee Shire Council

Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Contracts Commencement Duration of Budgeted Contractor Contract detail & purpose Contract value date contract (Y/N)

Notes 1. Minimum reporting level is 1% of estimated income from continuing operations or $50,000 whichever is the lesser. 2. Contracts to be listed are those entered into during the quarter and have yet to be fully performed, excluding contractors that are on Council's preferred supplier list).

3. Contracts for employment are not required to be included. 4. Where a contract for services etc was not included in the budget, an explanation is to be given (or reference made to an explanation in another Budget Review Statement).

This document forms part of Junee Shire Council's Quarterly Budget Review Statement for the quarter ended 30/09/2015 and should be read in conjunction with other documents in the QBRS.

Page 7 of 60 PART B - Consultancy and Legal expenses Junee Shire Council

Budget review for the quarter ended - 30 September 2015 Consultancy and Legal expenses

Expenditure YTD Budgeted Expense $ (Y/N)

Consultancies $27,410.00 Y

Legal Fees $7,185.00 Y

Definition of consultant: A consultant is a person or organisation engaged under contract on a temporary basis to provide recommendations or high level specialist or professional advice to assist decision-making by management. Generally it is the advisory nature of the work that differentiates a consultant from other contractors.

This document forms part of Junee Shire Council's Quarterly Budget Review Statement for the quarter ended 30/09/2015 and should be read in conjunction with other documents in the QBRS.

Page 8 of 60 Operating Surplus / Deficit

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Projected 2015 Operating Surplus / Deficit -248,000 24,000 -282,000 3 80,000 461 ,000 -604,000 -1,571,000 614,358 Total Revenue 11,273,000 11,728,000 11,567,0 00 12,827,0 00 14,037,0 00 13,007,000 12,418,000 14,463,711 Capital Grants & Contributions 817,000 1,287,000 927,000 900 ,000 883 ,000 1,214,000 1,131,000 1,271,0 21 Total Revenue less Capital Amounts 10,456,000 10,441,000 10,640,0 00 11,927,0 00 13,154,0 00 11,793,000 11,287,000 13,192,690

Operating Surplus / Deficit compared to Total Revenue less Capital Amounts -2.37% 0.23% -2.65% 3.19% 3.50% -5.12% -13.92% 4.66%

Rates & Annual Charges Coverage 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Projected 2015 Rates & Annual Charges 2,952,000 3,084,000 3,502,0 00 3,629,0 00 3,754,0 00 3,910,000 4,197,000 3,910,0 01 Total Revenue 11,273,000 11,728,000 11,567,0 00 12,827,0 00 14,037,0 00 13,007,000 12,418,000 14,463,711 Rates & Annual Charges as a % of Total Revenue 26.19% 26.30% 30.28% 28.29% 26.74% 30.06% 33.80% 27.03%

Current Ratio 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Projected 2015 Current Assets 5,036,000 5,876,000 5,724,0 00 5,437,0 00 5,757,0 00 5,467,000 4,879,000 3,899,5 92 Current Liabilities 2,192,000 1,665,000 2,441,0 00 2,436,0 00 2,480,0 00 2,541,000 3,418,000 3,194,2 93 Current Ratio - Current Assets compared to Current Liabilities 2.30 3.53 2.34 2.23 2.32 2.15 1.43 1.22

Page 9 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan

Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

1 Executive Services

1.1 Governance & General Manager

Revenue

1.1 Total Revenue 0 0 0 0

Expenditure

Governance Expenses 20050 Mayoral Allowance 17,645 17,645 20050 Councillors Fees 73,132 73,132 20050 Other Governance Expenses 7,000 7,000 20050 Civic Receptions & Entertaining 11,000 11,000 Revote 14/15 Councillor projects Councillor Projects 63,000 35,000 28,000 Res. June meeting 20050 Memberships & Contributions 6,000 6,000 20050 Election Expenses 0 0 20055 LGSA Membership 18,708 18,708 20056 REROC Membership 15,450 15,450 Consultants - Community Strategic Plan / Community 30,000 30,000 Survey

General Manager's Office 20370 Salaries & Wages 284,508 284,508 20370 Employees Leave Entitlements 55,798 55,798 20370 Employment Overheads 42,771 42,771 20370 Office Expenses 6,700 6,700 20370 Other GM Expenses 13,000 13,000 20375 Internal Audits 15,450 15,450 29671 Employee Survey 0 0

1.1 Total Expenditure 660,162 632,162 28,000 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -660,162 -632,162 -28,000 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -660,162 -632,162 -28,000 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets -28,000 -28,000 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 28,000 0 28,000 0

Page 10 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015 SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets Tablets for Councillors 0 0

0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

1.1 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -632,162 -632,162 0 0

Page 11 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

1.2 Fire Control and Emergency Services

Revenue Grants & Subsidies 13252 - Section B & C Reimbursement 0 0 13253 - Firebreaks on roads -10,000 -10,000 13252 Reimbursement - Other Programs Cont -45,769 -45,769 13259 Mt Ulandra - Site Fees radio users -10,000 -10,000

1.2 Total Revenue -65,769 -65,769 0 0

Expenditure

21908 NSW FB Contributions 20,000 20,000 23186 SES Expenses 21,000 21,000 21906 Mt Ulandra - Radio Licence Fees, Dept Lands 9,500 9,500 21903 Depreciation 2,538 2,538

Rural Fire Service 21901 Cont to Rural Fire Fighting Fund 96,039 96,039 21900 Total Section B & C Expenditure 0 0 0 0 21914 Hazard Reduction - Firebreaks on roads 10,000 10,000 21900 Fire Operations (Non-claimable) 4,000 4,000

1.2 Total Expenditure 163,077 163,077 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -97,308 -97,308 0 0

Capital Grants Total Capital Grants 0 0 0 0 Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -97,308 -97,308 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -2,538 -2,538 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 2,538 2,538 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

Page 12 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2013/14 2015/16 30 Sept 2015 SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

1.2 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -94,770 -94,770 0 0

Page 13 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

1.3 Economic Development

Revenue

1.3 Total Revenue 0 0 0 0

Expenditure

29651 Riverina Regional Tourism 3,700 3,700 Town Pride & Promotion 70,000 70,000 29667 Depreciation 1,624 1,624

1.3 Total Expenditure 75,324 75,324 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -75,324 -75,324 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -75,324 -75,324 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -1,624 -1,624 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 1,624 1,624 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Total Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

1.3 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -73,700 -73,700 0 0

Page 14 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

1.4 Geospatial Alliance Project

Revenue

1.4 Total Revenue 0 0 0 0 0

Expenditure

29800 Operating Lease 0 0

1.4 Total Expenditure 0 0 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts 0 0 0 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result 0 0 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation 0 0 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed

Carrying Amount of Assets Sold 0 0 0 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets - GAP 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets - GAP 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

1.4 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 0 0 0 0

Page 15 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

2 Corporate & Community Services

2.1 Finance

Revenue

11046 Rates Levied -3,494,171 -3,494,171 11051 Rates - Interest Charged -37,000 -37,000 11161 Rates - Legal fees charged -24,000 -24,000 12700 Financial Assistance - General Grants -2,625,358 -2,644,242 18,884 Annual adjustment FAGs 12920 Pensioner Rate Subsidy -46,000 -46,000 12925 Interest on Investments -35,000 -35,000 21006 Rates Pensioner Rebate 83,150 83,150

2.1 Total Revenue -6,178,379 -6,197,263 0 18,884

Expenditure

21004 Rates Debtors Costs 24,000 24,000 21007 Debtors Adjustment & Writeoffs 5,000 5,000

2.1 Total Expenditure 29,000 29,000 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts 6,149,379 6,168,263 0 -18,884

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result 6,149,379 6,168,263 0 -18,884

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance 12926 Repayments by Deferred Debtors 0 0 Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate 30440 Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

2.1 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 6,149,379 6,168,263 0 -18,884

Page 16 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

2.2 Corporate Services

Revenue

Sale of Assets 10500 Sundry Income -2,122 -2,122 10504 Insurance Premium Rebates -28,500 -28,500 10590 Centerlink Agency Income -21,642 -21,642 10599 Section 735A Certificates -750 -750 10600 Section 603 Certificates -12,360 -12,360 12705 Grant - Website enhancements 0 0 10601 Agency Income -90,640 -90,640

2.2 Total Revenue -156,014 -156,014 0 0

Expenditure

20306 Insurance Expense 266,845 266,845

20434 Salaries & Wages 555,931 555,931 20434 Employees Leave Entitlements 96,727 96,727 20434 Employment Overheads 117,779 117,779 20434 Office Expenses 87,500 87,500 Interest on Loans 1,000 1,000 Auditors Expenses 17,000 17,000 Valuation Fees 24,500 24,500 Other CS Expenses 5,000 5,000 Workforce Planning Implementation 32,000 32,000 Records Management Review & Upgrade 25,000 25,000 Website enhancements 0 0 20438 Asset Valuation Expenses 0 0 20437 Electronic Document Management System 9,300 9,300 20498 Mapping Software & Support 13,500 13,500 20498 IT Services - other than Civica 75,100 75,100 20498 Civica Maintenance & Upgrade Program 65,300 65,300 Civica Development Expenses 60,000 35,000 25,000 Council resolution Sept 2015 20455 Write Off - Brass Band debt 0 0 20435 Bank Charges 15,625 15,625 21074 Corporate Support Services - FDC -2,000 -2,000 21074 Corporate Support Services - Sewer -86,100 -86,100 21074 Corporate Support Services - DWM -27,637 -27,637 0 20436 Depreciation 58,873 58,873

2.2 Total Expenditure 1,411,243 1,386,243 0 25,000

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -1,255,229 -1,230,229 0 -25,000

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -1,255,229 -1,230,229 0 -25,000

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -58,873 -58,873 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 58,873 58,873 0 0

Page 17 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed 10509 Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors 0 0 Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 30500 Office Furniture & Equipment 7,000 7,000 30503 IT Equipment 12,000 12,000 New Phone System 20,000 20,000

Total Acquisition of Assets 39,000 39,000 0 0 Development of Real Estate 30440 Advance to Deferred Debtors 0 30434 Repayment of Loans 0 Repayment of Other Debts 0 Transfer to Restricted Assets 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 39,000 39,000 0 0 Purposes

2.2 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -1,235,356 -1,210,356 0 -25,000

Page 18 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

2.3 Community Development

Revenue

15673 Grant - Community Builders Program -41,000 -41,000 15678 Grant - Youth Week -1,230 -1,230 15681 Grant - Senior Week Activities 0 0 15679 Holiday Activites Income -4,100 -4,100

2.3 Total Revenue -46,330 -46,330 0 0

Expenditure

Community Development Expenses 25105 Salaries & Wages 56,077 56,077 25105 Employees Leave Entitlements 10,343 10,343 25105 Employment Overheads 9,445 9,445 25105 Office Expenses 1,000 1,000 25105 Operational Expenses 5,500 5,500 25111 Community Donations 6,000 6,000 25114 Eastern Riverina Arts Program 0 0 25115 CSU Scholarship 0 0

24978 Community Builders Program (was Youth Activities) 19,092 19,092

26700 Australia Day Expenses 2,000 2,000 20114 Senior Citizens Activities 1,000 1,000 2.3 Total Expenditure 110,457 110,457 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -64,127 -64,127 0 0

Total Capital Grants 0 Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -64,127 -64,127 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

Page 19 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold 0 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Total Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Total Transfer to Restricted Assets 0 0 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

2.3 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -64,127 -64,127 0 0

Page 20 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

2.4 Family Day Care

Revenue

Family Day Care 15765 Contribution - Private Leaseback on Car -6,200 -6,200 15781 Parent Fees - Administration Fee -99,848 -99,848 15781 Carers Fees - Levy + Annual M'Ship Fee -7,457 -7,457 15781 Operational Support Grants -120,000 -120,000 15781 RTAG Grants 0 0 15782 FDC CCB Reimbursement -620,000 -620,000 15782 DSUPS Reimbursements 0 0

2.4 Total Revenue -853,505 -853,505 0 0

Expenditure

Family Day Care 24850 Salaries & Wages 130,511 130,511 24850 Employees Leave Entitlements 24,072 24,072 24850 Employment Overheads 18,906 18,906 24850 Office Expenses 16,750 16,750 24850 Operational Expenses 45,100 45,100 24851 Corporate Support Services 2,000 2,000

24852 FDC CCB Payments 620,000 620,000

2.4 Total Expenditure 857,339 857,339 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -3,834 -3,834 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -3,834 -3,834 0 0

Page 21 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation 0 0 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed

Carrying Amount of Assets Sold - Family Day Care 0 0 0 0

Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets - FDC -3,834 -3,834 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 3,834 3,834 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 37430 FDC Capital Purchases 0 0

0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets - FDC 0 0 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

2.4 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 0 0 0 0

Page 22 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

2.5 Community Transport

Revenue

Community Transport 15675 Community Tpt - Sale of Car -34,000 -34,000 15676 Community Tpt-HACC & CTP Grant Dept Trans -110,313 -110,313 10613 Community Tpt - Passenger Fees -31,827 -31,827 10615 Community Tpt - Grant GMAHS -17,100 -17,100 10616 Community Tpt - Grant Veteran Affairs -4,000 -4,000 15676 Community Tpt - Sale of Bus -25,000 -25,000

2.5 Total Revenue -222,240 -222,240 0 0

Expenditure

Community Transport 25107 Salaries & Wages 39,507 39,507 25107 Employees Leave Entitlements 7,287 7,287 25107 Employment Overheads 4,732 4,732 25107 Community Tpt -Op Exp 79,580 79,580 25107 Depreciation - Community Tpt Program 39,287 39,287 25102 WDV Sales - Community Tpt Program 68,000 68,000

2.5 Total Expenditure 238,393 238,393 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -16,153 -16,153 0 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -16,153 -16,153 0 0

Page 23 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -39,287 -39,287 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 39,287 39,287 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold - Community -68,000 -68,000 0 0 Transport Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets - CTP -26,866 -26,866 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 94,866 94,866 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 37422 Community Tpt Program - Vehicle Purchase 118,000 118,000

118,000 118,000 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets - CTP 0 0 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 118,000 118,000 0 0 Purposes

2.5 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 0 0 0 0

Page 24 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

2.6 Library Services

Revenue

16990 Junee Library Sundry Income -5,500 -5,500 16990 Grant - per Capita basis -11,520 -11,520 16990 Grant - Disability & Geographic Adjustment -12,384 -12,384

2.6 Total Revenue -29,404 -29,404 0 0

Expenditure

Junee Library 26578 Salaries & Wages 89,294 89,294 26578 Employees Leave Entitlements 14,851 14,851 26578 Employment Overheads 13,816 13,816 26578 Office Expenses 46,000 46,000 26578 Other Operational Expenses 9,000 9,000 26578 RRL Contribution 97,368 97,368 26579 Depreciation 30,452 30,452

26580 Interest on Loans - CPI Indexed Bonds 71,057 71,057 Interest on Loans - Additional Loan 6,888 6,888 2.6 Total Expenditure 378,726 378,726 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -349,322 -349,322 0 0

16991 Grant - Disability & Geographic Adjustment -5,600 -5,600 Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont -5,600 -5,600 0 0

Operating Result -343,722 -343,722 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -30,452 -30,452 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 30,452 30,452 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold 0 0 0 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used 0 0 Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

Page 25 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 34500 Junee Library Capital Expenses 16,555 5,600 10,955 Unspent Grant from 2014/15

Total Acquisition of Assets 16,555 5,600 0 10,955 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans - CPI Indexed Bonds 230 230 Repayment of Loans - Additional Loan 3,075 3,075 Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 19,860 8,905 0 10,955 Purposes

2.6 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -333,130 -322,175 0 -10,955

Page 26 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

2.7 Recreation Centre

Revenue

17603 Annual Memberships -152,000 -152,000 17603 Casual Admission - Gym / Aerobics -21,000 -21,000 17603 Casual Admission - Pool -53,000 -53,000 17603 Kiosk Sales -41,000 -41,000 17603 Other Income -2,500 -2,500 17603 Retail Sales -5,000 -5,000 17603 Special Events 0 0 17603 Stadium Hire -8,000 -8,000

2.7 Total Revenue -282,500 -282,500 0 0

Expenditure

26900 Salaries & Wages 379,062 379,062 26900 Employees Leave Entitlements 44,713 44,713 26900 Employment Overheads 40,729 40,729 26900 Office Expenses 26,300 26,300 26900 Other Operational Expenses 302,150 302,150 0 Revote 14/15 Aussie Hoops un 26901 "Aussie Hoops" Grant Expenditure 6,307 0 6,307 expended grant 26899 Depreciation 89,833 89,833 26898 Interest on Loans - CPI Indexed Bonds 138,183 138,183 Interest on NEW Loan $350K in 2015-16 0 2.7 Total Expenditure 1,027,277 1,020,970 6,307 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -744,777 -738,470 -6,307 0

Capital Grants 0 0 Total Capital Contributions 0 0 0 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -744,777 -738,470 -6,307 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -89,833 -89,833 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 89,833 89,833 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used -350,000 -350,000 Transfer from Restricted Assets -6,307 0 -6,307 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 356,307 350,000 6,307 0

Page 27 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan

Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 37411 Building Renewal Capital Exp 20,000 20,000 37411 Gymnasium equipment & upgrades 25,000 25,000 37411 Pool Renewal Capital Exp 0 0 Revote 14/15 to support capital 37411 Capital Works - including energy efficiency 420,368 350,000 70,368 project at Rec Centre. Council resolution Aug 15 (less $27,207) 37411 Replace doors around pool deck 0 37411 Gas heaters for pool 5,000 5,000 37411 Computer System-new server & upgrade PC's 0 0 New Hypo Tank 15,000 15,000 Upgrades to rear of workshop - incl carport 0 Concrete / fencing - boom storage area Multi Cleaner 11,000 11,000 37411 Pool Covers 0 0 37411 Painting internal & external 0 0 37411 Paint pools 0 0

Total Acquisition of Assets 496,368 426,000 0 70,368 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors 36210 Repayment of Loans - CPI Indexed Bonds 448 448 Principal on NEW Loan Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 496,816 426,448 0 70,368 Purposes

2.7 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -795,453 -725,085 0 -70,368

Page 28 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

2.8 Public Halls and Buildings

Revenue 17662 Grant - Athenium Theatre 0 0 17670 Hire income - Athenium Theatre -1,200 -1,200

2.8 Total Revenue -1,200 -1,200 0 0

Expenditure

26706 Athenium Theatre-Maintenance Expenses 14,000 14,000 26708 Broadway Museum 19,500 9,000 10,500 Stair lift Broadway 26713 Depreciation 26,391 26,391 Interest on Loans - Athenium Theatre - CPI Indexed 26716 15,447 15,447 Bonds

2.8 Total Expenditure 75,338 64,838 10,500 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -74,138 -63,638 -10,500 0

Total Capital Grants 0 0 0 0 Capital Contributions 0 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -74,138 -63,638 -10,500 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -26,391 -26,391 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 26,391 26,391 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold 0 0 0 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used 0 0 Transfer from Restricted Assets -10,500 0 -10,500 Stair lift Broadway Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 10,500 0 10,500 0

Page 29 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 37802 Broadway Museum 0 0 37816 Athenium Theatre 0 0

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans - Athenium Theatre - CPI 50 50 Indexed Bonds Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 50 50 0 0 Purposes

2.8 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -37,297 -37,297 0 0

Page 30 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

Development & Environmental 3 Services

3.1 Noxious Plant Control

Revenue

15010 Noxious Weeds Grant - Op & Admin -49,921 -49,921

3.1 Total Revenue -49,921 -49,921 0 0

Expenditure

Noxious Weeds Management Expenses 23698 Office Expenses 516 516 23698 Operational Expenses 82,273 82,273 23890 Noxious Weeds-Local 20,000 20,000

3.1 Total Expenditure 102,789 102,789 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -52,868 -52,868 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -52,868 -52,868 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Total Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

3.1 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -52,868 -52,868 0 0

Page 31 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

3.2 Animal Control & LG Regulations

Revenue

13910 Companion Animal Commission -5,565 -5,565 14100 Orders - fines & fees -5,574 -5,574

3.2 Total Revenue -11,139 -11,139 0 0

Expenditure

22930 Animal Control Expenses 2,167 2,167 22930 Dog Control Expenses 26,626 26,626 22930 Stock Control Expenses 1,032 1,032

3.2 Total Expenditure 29,825 29,825 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -18,686 -18,686 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -18,686 -18,686 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

3.2 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -18,686 -18,686 0 0

Page 32 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

3.3 Property Management

Revenue Council Houses Sale of Residence -350,000 -350,000 10560 Sale of Residence -350,000 -350,000

15891 Willow Park Cottage -8,699 -8,699 15891 33 John Potts Drv 0 0 15891 3 Pike Place -2,800 -2,800

Caravan Park 19630 Junee Caravan Park Rents & Charges -10,079 -10,079

Medical Centre 15340 Rent - Junee Medical Centre -54,902 -54,902

3.3 Total Revenue -776,480 -776,480 0 0

Expenditure

Council Houses WRITTEN DOWN VALUE OF SALES 10550 WDV - Sale of Residence 389,000 389,000 10550 WDV - Sale of Residence 380,000 380,000

Total Written Down Value of Sales 769,000 769,000 0 0

Council Houses 25170 Willow Park Cottage 3,199 3,199 25170 33 John Potts Drv 0 0 25170 3 Pike Place 12,500 2,500 10,000 Prepartion for sale of dwelling. 25171 Depreciation 6,151 6,151 25170 Interest on Loans - CPI Indexed Bonds 43,498 43,498

Caravan Park 29458 Junee Caravan Park Op Expenses 0 0 29460 Depreciation 11,166 11,166 29459 Interest on Loans - CPI Indexed Bonds 1,823 1,823

Medical Centre 24722 Junee Medical Centre 10,970 10,970 24724 Depreciation 15,733 15,733 Interest on Loans - New Medical Centre CPI Indexed 24725 54,388 54,388 Bonds

Administration Building 21090 Administration Building 58,052 58,052 21092 Interest on Loans - CPI Indexed Bonds 3,089 3,089 21091 Depreciation 16,749 16,749

3.3 Total Expenditure 1,006,318 996,318 0 10,000

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -229,838 -219,838 0 -10,000

15893 Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -229,838 -219,838 0 -10,000

Page 33 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -6,151 -6,151 0 0 Depreciation -11,166 -11,166 0 0 Depreciation -15,733 -15,733 0 0 Depreciation -16,749 -16,749 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 49,799 49,799 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold -769,000 -769,000 0 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Total Loan Funds used 0 0 0 0 Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 769,000 769,000 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets Council Houses Major renovation after tentant 33204 Willow Park Cottage 25,000 0 25,000 left. New roof, In & Ex painting

Caravan Park 37990 Caravan Park Capital Expenditure 0 0

Medical Centre 37812 Medical Centre 0 0

Administration Building 30501 Administration Building 25,000 0 25,000 Revote Ex painting. 14/15

50,000 0 0 50,000 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Council Houses - Repayment of Loans - CPI Indexed 35170 141 141 Bonds Caravan Park - Repayment of Loans - CPI Indexed 6 6 Bonds Caravan Park - Repayment of Loans - National Bank 0 0 Loan Medical Centre - Repayment of Loans - CPI Indexed 37815 176 176 Bonds Administration Building - Repayment of Loans - CPI 10 10 Indexed Bonds Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 50,333 333 0 50,000 Purposes

3.3 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 538,628 598,628 0 -60,000

Page 34 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

3.4 Town Planning & Building Control

Revenue 14900 Food Premises Inspection Fees -5,400 -5,400 15500 Health Inspections -350 -350 16900 Licences - Business & Entertainment 0 0 16400 Septic Tank Application Fees -1,000 -1,000

16000 Sec. 149 Certificates -17,510 -17,510 16116 Sec 94A Levy -40,000 -40,000 16110 Development Application Fees -54,106 -54,106 16111 Planning Levy Commission -212 -212 16114 Construction Certificate & Part 4A Certificates -11,988 -11,988 16220 Sundry Income -1,500 -1,500

3.4 Total Revenue -132,066 -132,066 0 0

Expenditure Town Planning Expenses 25426 Salaries & Wages 241,933 241,933 25426 Employees Leave Entitlements 46,080 46,080 25426 Employment Overheads 37,545 37,545 25426 Office Expenses 7,000 7,000 25426 Operational Expenses 7,000 7,000

Electronic Housing Code Project 20,145 0 20,145 Revote 14/15 unexpended grant

26790 Heritage Advisor Service 0 0

3.4 Total Expenditure 359,703 339,558 20,145 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -227,637 -207,492 -20,145 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -227,637 -207,492 -20,145 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets -155,145 -67,500 -87,645 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 155,145 67,500 87,645 0

Page 35 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2013/14 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets Revote 14/15 Unexpended grant 37403 Creating Livable Communities 77,500 0 67,500 10,000 Liveable Communities

Total Acquisition of Assets 77,500 0 67,500 10,000 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 77,500 0 67,500 10,000 Purposes

3.4 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -149,992 -139,992 0 -10,000

Page 36 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4 Engineering Services

4.1 Engineering Infrastructure

Revenue

19001 Road Rentals -11,300 -11,300

4.1 Total Revenue -11,300 -11,300 0 0

Expenditure

21138 Salaries & Wages 156,804 156,804 21138 Employees Leave Entitlements 43,059 43,059 21138 Employment Overheads 36,480 36,480 21138 Office Expenses 21,000 21,000 21138 Other ES Expenses 4,000 4,000

4.1 Total Expenditure 261,343 261,343 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -250,043 -250,043 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -250,043 -250,043 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

4.1 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -250,043 -250,043 0 0

Page 37 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.2 Operational Services Provision

Revenue

10707 Gravel Pits - Contribution to Reinstatement -5,000 -5,000

4.2 Total Revenue -5,000 -5,000 0 0

Expenditure

Field Staff 20721 Superannuation - Employer Contributions 272,129 272,129 21330 Field Staff - On Costs 399,330 399,330 21394 Direct Banking Allowance 3,000 3,000 21600 Workers Compensation Expenses 134,700 134,700 21650 Re-Allocation of Field Staff On costs -923,159 -923,159

Depots 21700 Works Depot Joffre St 114,000 114,000

Other Staff Overheads 20721 Superannuation - Employer Contributions 242,380 242,380 21600 Workers Compensation Expenses 20,000 20,000 Re-Allocation of OTHER Staff On costs - 21655 -262,380 -262,380 Superannuation & W/Comp 28116 Quarry Operating Costs 5,000 5,000 21701 Depreciation 15,226 15,226

4.2 Total Expenditure 20,226 20,226 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -15,226 -15,226 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -15,226 -15,226 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation -15,226 -15,226 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 15,226 15,226 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

Page 38 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 30804 Depot Building Construction 0 0 21202 Capital Works Planning & Coordination 32,926 32,926

Total Acquisition of Assets 32,926 32,926 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 32,926 32,926 0 0 Purposes

4.2 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -32,926 -32,926 0 0

Page 39 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.3 Plant & Equipment

Revenue

10610 Sale of Plant -187,000 -187,000 10611 Diesel Fuel Rebate -30,000 -30,000

4.3 Total Revenue -217,000 -217,000 0 0

Expenditure

21778 Plant Running Expenses 1,302,670 1,302,670 21778 Expenses NOT allocated by Plant # 60,333 60,333 21780 Minor Equipment Purchases 10,000 10,000 21842 Plant Income -1,409,613 -1,409,613 21844 Writeback of Plant Profit 46,610 46,610

10550 WDV - Sale of Plant 187,000 187,000 0 0 21139 Depreciation 177,635 177,635

4.3 Total Expenditure 374,635 374,635 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -157,635 -157,635 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -157,635 -157,635 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -177,635 -177,635 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 177,635 177,635 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Plant - Carrying Amt of Assets Sold -187,000 -187,000 0 0

Carrying Amount of Assets Sold -187,000 -187,000 0 0

Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets Plant Profit utilised -46,610 -46,610 0 0

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 233,610 233,610 0 0

Page 40 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 30801 Plant Purchased 360,000 360,000 Survey Equipment 65,000 65,000

Total Acquisition of Assets 425,000 425,000 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 425,000 425,000 0 0 Purposes

4.3 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -171,390 -171,390 0 0

Page 41 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.4 Public Cemeteries

Revenue

16660 Junee Lawn Cemetery Fees -75,000 -75,000 16661 Junee Monumental Cemetery Fees -4,000 -4,000 16662 Rural Cemetery Fees -2,575 -2,575

4.4 Total Revenue -81,575 -81,575 0 0

Expenditure

26130 Junee Monumental Cemetery 6,590 6,590 26130 Junee Lawn Cemetery 94,603 94,603 26130 Rural Cemeterys 9,886 9,886 26131 Depreciation 1,016 1,016 4.4 Total Expenditure 112,095 112,095 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -30,520 -30,520 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -30,520 -30,520 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation -1,016 -1,016 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 1,016 1,016 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 36132 Construction of Beams 3,500 3,500

Total Acquisition of Assets 3,500 3,500 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 3,500 3,500 0 0 Purposes

4.4 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -33,004 -33,004 0 0

Page 42 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.5 Public Conveniences

Expenditure

26322 Public Conveniences Operating Exp 59,000 59,000

4.5 Total Expenditure 59,000 59,000 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -59,000 -59,000 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -59,000 -59,000 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets Medical Centre 0 0

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

4.5 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -59,000 -59,000 0 0

Page 43 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.6 Waste Management Services

Revenue

81251 Domestic Waste Management Charge DWM Charge-Residential Junee -431,797 -431,797 DWM Charge-Residential Junee Vacant Land -9,787 -9,787 DWM Charge-Residential Villages -32,573 -32,573 DWM Charge-Residential Villages Vacant Land -1,815 -1,815 81251 Commercial Charges 81251 Commercial - Garbage Charge -32,842 -32,842 81251 Commercial - Garbage Charge (2nd Bin - 240l) -16,827 -16,827 81251 Commercial - Garbage Charge (2nd Bin - 120l) -31,185 -31,185 81251 Rural Waste Charge -50,529 -50,529 Rural Waste Charge 81253 Other Charges - Domestic Waste -2,060 -2,060 82611 Pensioner Rate Subsidy - DWM Charge -19,150 -19,150 81256 Tip Fees - Junee Tip -44,770 -44,770 81519 Sale of scrap steel - Junee Tip -21,855 -21,855 81518 Drummuster Income -3,708 -3,708 82611 Pensioner Rebate - DWM Charge 37,500 37,500

4.6 Total Revenue -661,398 -661,398 0 0

Expenditure

82276 Collection Expenses Junee collection 255,110 255,110 Old Junee collection 10,524 10,524 Illabo collection 7,760 7,760 Bethungra collection 2,445 2,445 0 82517 Kerbside Recycling Expenses - Junee 118,520 118,520 82517 Kerbside Recycling Expenses - Villages 9,886 9,886

82498 Garbage Tips Working Expenses 82498 Junee Tip Expenses 159,019 159,019 82498 Old Junee Tip Expenses 8,769 8,769 82498 Illabo Tip Expenses 13,712 13,712 82498 Bethungra Tip Expenses 11,693 11,693 82498 Junee Reefs Tip Expenses 15,307 15,307 82498 Eurongilly Tip Expenses 1,648 1,648 82498 Wantabadgery Tip Expenses 10,736 10,736 82609 Domestic Waste Salaries 42,129 42,129 82609 Employees Leave Entitlements 7,770 7,770 82609 Employment Overheads 4,625 4,625 82518 Drummuster Expenditure 3,708 3,708 82499 Depreciation 6,090 6,090 82609 Corporate Support Services 27,637 27,637

4.6 Total Expenditure 717,088 717,088 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -55,690 -55,690 0 0

Capital Grants -75,816 -75,816 Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont -75,816 -75,816 0 0

Operating Result 20,126 20,126 0 0

Page 44 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15 ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -6,090 -6,090 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 6,090 6,090 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used 81257 Transfer from Restricted Assets -83,792 -83,792 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 83,792 83,792 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 82535 Junee Transfer Station 52,700 52,700 82535 Eurongilly Transfer Station 47,308 47,308 82553 Purchase Replacement Bins 0 10,000 -10,000 Sufficient bins in stock

Total Acquisition of Assets 100,008 110,008 0 -10,000 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets 10,000 0 10,000

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 110,008 110,008 0 0 Purposes

4.6 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 0 0 0 0

Page 45 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.7 Sewerage

Revenue

91527 Annual Rates - Sewerage Charges -624,688 -624,688 91530 Interest on Investments -55,000 -55,000 91538 Other Sewerage Charges -76,754 -76,754 91538 Sewer Headworks Charges -4,800 -4,800 92494 Pensioner Rate Subsidy -19,900 -19,900 91907 Grey Water Sales -1,000 -1,000 92494 Pensioner Rebate 35,200 35,200

4.7 Total Revenue -746,942 -746,942 0 0

Expenditure

92026 Management Expenses - Salaries 50,012 50,012 92026 Employees Leave Entitlements 8,317 8,317 92026 Employment Overheads 4,950 4,950 92182 Mains Operating Expenses 89,926 89,926 92390 Treatment Works - Operating Expenses 230,000 230,000 92442 Effluent Re-uses Operational Costs 35,000 35,000 Interest Expense 0 0 92026 Corporate Support Services 86,100 86,100 92130 Depreciation - Sewerage Assets 284,216 284,216

4.7 Total Expenditure 788,521 788,521 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -41,579 -41,579 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -41,579 -41,579 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation -284,216 -284,216 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 284,216 284,216 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets -274,696 0 -162,696 -112,000 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 274,696 0 162,696 112,000

Page 46 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets New Works-Growth

New Works-ILOS 92222 SCADA & PLC upgrade 50,000 0 50,000 92201 Sewer Mains Construction 20,000 20,000

New Works-Renewals 92213 Sewer replacement program 20,000 20,000 92217 Plant Works Program 5,000 10,000 -5,000 Additional repair work to bank between pond 1 & 2. Remove & 92226 Bank repairs - Ponds 2 & 3 294,696 50,000 112,696 132,000 replace approx. 10,000 cu.m of unsuitable from pond 2. No sewer vents identified for 92227 Sewer Vent replacement 0 10,000 -10,000 removal. 92220 Sewer relining program 0 0 92225 Replacement of effluent pumping plant 5,000 10,000 -5,000 92202 Effluent Reuse Scheme 3,000 3,000 Sewer Treatment Works - Replace trickling filter, 15,000 15,000 Pasveer Electrical, Siteworks 92214 Manhole repair & raising 7,000 7,000 Smoke testing 0 0 Replace jetter trailer 0 0

Total Acquisition of Assets 419,696 145,000 162,696 112,000 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts 92026 Transfer to Restricted Assets 97,637 97,637 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 517,333 242,637 162,696 112,000 Purposes

4.7 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 0 0 0 0

Page 47 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.8 Sporting Grounds

Revenue

17650 Sporting Grounds Income 0 0

4.8 Total Revenue 0 0 0 0

Expenditure

26962 Sporting Grounds Operating Expenses 95,264 95,264 27560 Lorne St Tennis Courts - Water Access Chg 537 537 26963 Depreciation 77,144 77,144 4.8 Total Expenditure 172,945 172,945 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -172,945 -172,945 0 0

17653 Capital Grants 0 0 Total Capital Contributions 0 0 0 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -172,945 -172,945 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation -77,144 -77,144 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 77,144 77,144 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 37281 Sporting Grounds Capital Work 17,500 10,000 7,500 Burns Park Lights

Total Acquisition of Assets 17,500 10,000 0 7,500 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 17,500 10,000 0 7,500 Purposes

4.8 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -113,301 -105,801 0 -7,500

Page 48 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.9 Parks and Gardens

Revenue

17655 Junee Reserves Trust Rental Income -16,444 -16,444 17657 Parks Gardens Rental Income -9,071 -9,071

4.9 Total Revenue -25,515 -25,515 0 0

Expenditure

27282 Parks & Gardens Operating Expenses 250,000 250,000 27346 Reserves Maintenance 12,900 12,900 27283 Depreciation 56,843 56,843 37820 Cenotaph Project 0 0

4.9 Total Expenditure 319,743 319,743 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -294,228 -294,228 0 0

17655 Capital Grants 0 0 17655 Capital Contributions 0 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -294,228 -294,228 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -56,843 -56,843 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 56,843 56,843 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Total Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets Shade structure and stormwater 37282 Parks & Gardens Capital Work 17,000 10,000 7,000 @ Memorial Park

Total Acquisition of Assets 17,000 10,000 0 7,000 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts

Transfer to Restricted Assets - Junee Reserves Trust 3,544 3,544 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 20,544 13,544 0 7,000 Purposes

4.9 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -257,929 -250,929 0 -7,000

Page 49 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.10 Urban Sealed & Unsealed Roads

Revenue

19431 Grant - Roads To Recovery -292,668 -200,000 -92,668 Additional R2R Inc.

4.10 Total Revenue -292,668 -200,000 0 -92,668

Expenditure

22300 Junee Streets Maintenance 215,244 215,244 22500 Junee Laneway Maintenance 17,585 17,585 Street Banners Cut 6,500 6,500 39015 Street Tree Planting & Removal 29,670 29,670 28882 Bus Shelters 1,135 1,135 25746 Junee Street Cleaning Operations 75,852 75,852 25747 Junee Footpath Mowing & Gutter Cleaning 25,800 25,800 28883 Depreciation - Urban Local Sealed & Unsealed 306,547 306,547 28884 Depreciation - Urban Reg Sealed & Unsealed 14,211 14,211 28885 Depreciation - Bridges 10,557 10,557 28886 Depreciation - Footpath & Bikepath 32,990 32,990 4.10 Total Expenditure 736,091 736,091 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -443,423 -536,091 0 92,668

Capital Grants 19422 Grant - RTA - Bike Way -18,700 0 -18,700

Total Capital Grants -18,700 0 0 -18,700 Capital Contributions

Total Capital Contributions 0 0 0 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont -18,700 0 0 -18,700

Operating Result -424,723 -536,091 0 111,368

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -364,305 -364,305 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 364,305 364,305 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

Page 50 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 32500 Junee Laneways - reconstruction & seal 26,626 26,626 Roads Reseals - Special Rates Variation 2009/10 (5 32300 0 0 yrs) 39012 Junee Bike Path Construction 37,400 0 37,400 2015/16 Bike Path Funding 32300 Footpaths 0 0 32300 Kerb & Gutter Refurbishment 0 0 32300 R2R - Urban Streets 292,668 200,000 92,668 Additional R2R Exp. 2012-13 Reduction in Cap Exp - to R2R Reference 0 Rate 32300 Junee Streets Capital Expenditure 278,682 278,682 39038 Bus Shelters - Orr/Bolton Sts 0 39039 Bus Shelters - Lorne St 0 39040 Bus Shelters - Jail Break Inn 0

Total Acquisition of Assets 635,376 505,308 0 130,068 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 635,376 505,308 0 130,068 Purposes

4.10 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -695,794 -677,094 0 -18,700

Page 51 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.11 Rural Sealed Roads

Revenue

19190 RR243 - RTA Block grant -407,000 -409,940 2,940 Reduced Block Grant Allocation

19198 Grant - Roads to Recovery #3 -878,004 -614,432 -263,572 Additional R2R Exp.

4.11 Total Revenue -1,285,004 -1,024,372 0 -260,632

Expenditure

22000 Shire Sealed Roads Maintenance 417,650 417,650 22600 Village Roads Maintenance 15,377 15,377 Revote from 14/15 Unspent 28370 RR243 Maintenance 132,249 70,155 62,094 Grant 28307 Depreciation - Rural Local Sealed 408,560 408,560 28308 Depreciation - Regional Rural Sealed 68,516 68,516 28309 Depreciation - Bridges Rural Regional 19,793 19,793 28310 Depreciation - Bridges Local Rural 30,959 30,959 Interest on LIRS Loan 49,783 49,783 Subsidy - Interest on LIRS Loan -26,164 -26,164

4.11 Total Expenditure 1,116,723 1,054,629 62,094 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts 168,281 -30,257 -62,094 260,632

Capital Grants 19194 Grant - REPAIR Prog - RR243 -66,905 -63,721 -3,184 Additional REPAIR grant Inc. Grant - Fixing Country Roads - Byrnes Road 19032 0 0 Deviation

Grant - Fixing Country Roads - Combaning Road -1,104,000 -1,104,000

Grant - Flood Damage Restoration - Feb 2012 0 0

Total Capital Grants -1,170,905 -1,167,721 0 -3,184 19032 Capital Contributions - Byrnes Road 0 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont -1,170,905 -1,167,721 0 -3,184

Operating Result 1,339,186 1,137,464 -62,094 263,816

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -527,828 -527,828 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 527,828 527,828 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used 0 Transfer from Restricted Assets -62,094

Total Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 -62,094 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 62,094 0

Page 52 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 32600 Village Roads Upgrade 22,685 22,685 32000 Shire Roads Capital Expenditure 353,756 353,756 38371 REPAIR Program 66,905 63,721 3,184 Additional REPAIR grant exp. 38370 RR243 - RTA Block Grant Cap Exp 336,845 339,785 -2,940 Reduced Block grant exp. 32000 Roads Reseals 230,000 230,000 Combaning Road (Fixing Country Roads $1.204M, 1,263,000 1,263,000 R2R $140K)

39322 R2R #3 Progam - excl Combaning Rd above $140K 719,004 455,432 263,572 Additional R2R Exp.

Byrnes Road Deviation (Grants + JSC funded 39341 0 0 $178,287) Brabins Road - LIRS Funded 0 0 Combaning Road - LIRS Funded 0 0 Marinna Road - LIRS Funded 0 0 Wantabadgery Road - LIRS Funded 0 0 Eurongilly Road - LIRS Funded 0 0

Total Acquisition of Assets 2,992,195 2,728,379 0 263,816 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans 81,157 81,157 Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 3,073,352 2,809,536 0 263,816 Purposes

4.11 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -1,206,338 -1,144,244 0 0

Page 53 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.12 Rural Unsealed Roads

Expenditure

22200 Shire Gravel Roads Maintenance 154,130 154,130 28329 Depreciation 378,616 378,616

4.12 Total Expenditure 532,746 532,746 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -532,746 -532,746 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -532,746 -532,746 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation -378,616 -378,616 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 378,616 378,616 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed

Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 32200 Gravel Roads Capital Expenditure 320,604 320,604

Total Acquisition of Assets 320,604 320,604 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 320,604 320,604 0 0 Purposes

4.12 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -474,734 -474,734 0 0

Page 54 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.13 Drainage Infrastructure

Revenue

15670 Storm Water Management Service Charge -43,569 -43,569

4.13 Total Revenue -43,569 -43,569 0 0

Expenditure

25874 Junee Stormwater Drainage Maintenance 11,713 11,713 25876 Depreciation 34,004 34,004

4.13 Total Expenditure 45,717 45,717 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -2,148 -2,148 0 0

15671 Capital Grants 0 Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -2,148 -2,148 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation -34,004 -34,004 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 34,004 34,004 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets 35875 Drainage Upgrade 40,000 40,000

Total Acquisition of Assets 40,000 40,000 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 40,000 40,000 0 0 Purposes

4.13 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -8,144 -8,144 0 0

Page 55 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.14 Street Lighting

Expenditure

29330 Street Lighting Charges 81,500 81,500

4.14 Total Expenditure 81,500 81,500 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -81,500 -81,500 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -81,500 -81,500 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

4.14 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -81,500 -81,500 0 0

Page 56 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.15 RMS Works

Revenue

19197 RTA Private Works Income - RMCC -400,000 -400,000 19197 RTA Private Works Income - Ordered Works -1,250,000 -1,250,000

4.15 Total Revenue -1,650,000 -1,650,000 0 0

Expenditure

29138 RTA Private Works Expenditure - RMCC 350,000 350,000

29172 RTA Private Works Expenditure - Ordered Work 1,050,000 1,050,000

4.15 Total Expenditure 1,400,000 1,400,000 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts 250,000 250,000 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result 250,000 250,000 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Total Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts 0 0 Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

4.15 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 250,000 250,000 0 0

Page 57 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

4.16 Property Development

Revenue

Sale of Land - Percy Street 0 0 10569 Sale of Land - John Potts Drive Stg 5 0 0 10573 Sale of Land - John Potts Drive Stg 6 -210,000 -210,000 Sale of Land - John Potts Drive - Stg 7 0 0 Sale of Land - Cassia Way -125,000 -125,000 10571 Sale of Land - Kaiser Subdivision -292,189 -292,189 Sale of Land - Hunter Street 0 0 10559 Sale of Industrial Land 0 0

4.16 Total Revenue -627,189 -627,189 0 0

Expenditure

WRITTEN DOWN VALUE OF SALES Percy St - Land Value 0 0 37948 John Potts Drive Stg 5 - Land Value 0 0 John Potts Drive Stg 6 - Land Value 172,920 172,920 John Potts Drive Stg 7 - Land Value 0 0 Cassia Way 72,000 72,000 37949 Kaiser Subdivision Land Value 240,497 240,497 Hunter St - Land Value 0 Total Written Down Value of Sales 485,417 485,417 0 0

29452 Subdivision Exp - Council land 5,000 5,000 29455 Real Estate for Sale - Holding Costs 34,100 34,100 29450 Interest on Loans - Real Estate Development 119,888 119,888

4.16 Total Expenditure 644,405 644,405 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts -17,216 -17,216 0 0

Capital Grants 10566 Capital Contributions 0 Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result -17,216 -17,216 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds Depreciation

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold -485,417 -485,417 0 0 Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds Used Real Estate Development 0 0

10570 Total Loan Funds Used 0 0 0 0

Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 485,417 485,417 0 0

Page 58 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30/9/15

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets Other Land Development - Hunter St, Percy St 0 0 Cassia Way - develop 3 lots 0 0 ***

Total Acquistion of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate 37946 John Potts Drive - Stg 5 0 0 John Potts Drive - Stg 6 42,900 42,900 John Potts Drive - Stage 7 0 0 37947 Kaiser Subdivision 49,400 49,400 Cassia Way - develop 3 lots 45,000 45,000 *** Total Development of Real Estate 137,300 137,300 0 0 ***

Advance to Deferred Debtors 37940 Repayment of Loans 350,000 350,000 Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets 0 0

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 487,300 487,300 0 0 Purposes

4.16 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) -19,099 -19,099 0 0

Page 59 of 60 Delivery

Pie Chart for User Operational Plan Projected QBR Master Description Budget Revotes Comments Budget Variation 2015/16 2015/16 30 Sept 2015

4.17 Private Works

Revenue

19850 Private Works Income -250,000 -250,000

4.17 Total Revenue -250,000 -250,000 0 0

Expenditure

29906 Private Works Expenditure 180,000 180,000

4.17 Total Expenditure 180,000 180,000 0 0

Operating Result-Before Capital Amounts 70,000 70,000 0 0

Capital Grants Capital Contributions Total Capital Grants & Cont 0 0 0 0

Operating Result 70,000 70,000 0 0

ADD Expenses not involving flows of Funds

Depreciation 0 0

Total Expenses not involving flows of Funds 0 0 0 0

ADD Non-Operating Funds employed Carrying Amount of Assets Sold 0 0 Cost of Real Estate Assets Sold Other Debt Finance Repayments by Deferred Debtors Loan Funds used Transfer from Restricted Assets 0 0 Plant Profit utilised

Total Non-Operating Funds employed 0 0 0 0

SUBTRACT Funds deployed for Non- Operating Purposes Acquisition of Assets

Total Acquisition of Assets 0 0 0 0 Development of Real Estate Advance to Deferred Debtors Repayment of Loans Repayment of Other Debts Transfer to Restricted Assets

Total Funds deployed for Non-Operating 0 0 0 0 Purposes

4.17 Net Budget Result Surplus/(Deficit) 70,000 70,000 0 0

Page 60 of 60 JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item No. Subject

8[DES] DEED OF AGREEMENT FOR SOUTH-EAST WEIGHT

OF LOADS GROUP MEMBERSHIP South East Weight of Loads Group

Deed of Agreement made the day of XXXX

Between

Queanbeyan City Council of 257 Crawford Street Queanbeyan

and

(COUNCIL)

Whereas the Local Government Councils' listed in Schedule 1 annexed hereto have agreed to join a voluntary association of such Councils for the purpose of administering the provisions of the Notional Heavy Vehicle Law Act 2012 to the extent that the Act provides limits on the Weights of Loads for Motor Vehicles using roads controlled by a local government authority as the Road Manager and create offences for breaches of those weight limits and whereas the association of Councils has agreed that the association will be known as the South East Weight of Loads Group (hereinafter referred to as the Group) and whereas the Group has appointed Queanbeyan City Council (hereinafter referred to as the administering Council) to carry out the administrative work of the Group and whereas it is the objective of the Group to reduce the cost of maintaining roads by preventing damage caused by overloading of vehicles using those roads and whereas the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator and Roads and Maritime Services have agreed to delegate to the Group relevant authority pursuant to the National Heavy Vehicle Law Act 2012 and whereas the Roads and Maritime Services of NSW has agreed to provide capital and operating financial assistance towards the cost of achieving this objective:

The parties to this Deed agree that: 1. This agreement will commence on the date of execution specified above and will

continue until 1 December XXXX. 2. A Council which is a member of the Group may terminate its membership by giving

six months notice in writing to the Administering CouncilfKwi]. 3. There will be established a Management Committee which will hold responsibility for

the Groups affairs.

-2-

SEWOL Councils Administered by Queanbeyan City Council Cooma-Monaro | Cootamundra | Goulburn Mulwaree PO Box 90 | Queanbeyan | NSW | 2620 Harden | Junee | Palerang | Queanbeyan | Shoalhaven Ph: 02 6285 6000 | Fax: 02 6285 6666 Snowy River | Wollondilly | Yass Valley Li. [email protected] <$

4. The assets and liabilities of the Group will be held and borne equally by the

members. If a member Council ceases to be a member of the Group they will not be

entitled to any share of the Group's assets.

5. During the currency of this Agreement Member Councils including the Administering

Council will each make an annual contribution towards the capital and operational

costs of the Group being an equal amount calculated by the Management

Committee due and payable to the Administering Council by August 31, each year. 6. The obligation to contribute will continue until 1 December XXXX even if a member

Council (regardless of the reason) ceases to participate in the activities of the Group.

Th7[KW2],

T

he annual contribution will be recoverable by the Group as a debt.

The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Queanbeyan was Mayor affixed hereunto in pursuance of a resolution of the said Council passed on DD MMM YYYY General Manager

The Common Seal of the Council of the (COUNCIL) Mayor was affixed hereunto in pursuance of a resolution of the said Council passed on General Manager

XXXX2014

SEWOL Councils Administered by Queanbeyan City Council Cooma-Monaro | Cootamundra | Goulburn Mulwaree PO Box 90 | Queanbeyan | NSW | 2620 Harden | Junee | Palerang | Queanbeyan | Shoalhaven Ph: 02 6285 6000 | Fax: 02 6285 6666 Snowy River | Wollondilly | Yass Valley sewol.inspectors|S)qcc.nsw.gov.au 4 <$?£K. ttl-U South East Weight of Loads Group

SCHEDULE 1

PARTIES TO MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

Council of the City Queanbeyan

Council of Cootamundra Shire

Council of Yass Valley Shire

Council of Palerang Shire

Council of Cooma-Monaro Shire

Council of Snowy River Shire

Council of Harden Shire

Council of Junee Shire

Council of the City of Shoalhaven

Council of Wollondillv Shire

Council of Goulburn Mulwaree Shire

SEWOL Councils Administered by Queanbeyan City Council Cooma-Monaro | Cootamundra i Goulburn Mulwaree PO Box 90 | Queanbeyan | NSW | 2620 Harden | Junee | Palerang | Queanbeyan | Shoalhaven Ph: 02 6285 6000 | Fax: 02 6285 6666 Snowy River | Wollondilly | Yass Valley [email protected] JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item No. Subject

9[ADDES] PROPOSED 21 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION – DA 2015/43 LOT 14 DP 833292 AND LOT 1 DP 391956 14 JOHN POTTS DRIVE AND 25 KITCHENER STREET JUNEE

JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item Subject No. 11[ADDES] JUNEE RESIDENTIAL STRATEGY 2006 – DRAFT

PROGRESS REPORT JUNEE RESIDENTIAL STRATEGY 2006 PROGRESS REPORT NOVEMBER 2015

REVISION: 11/11/2015 9:58 AM CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 1 1.2. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 1.2. CURRENT SITUATION 1 1.3. KEY TRENDS 2 1.4. HOUSING DEMAND 2 1.5 LAND SUPPLY 3 1.6 CONCLUSIONS 8

REVISION: 11/11/2015 9:58 AM

INTRODUCTION

1.1. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared to provide an update on the implementation of the Junee Residential Strategy 2006 (“the Strategy”) for residential land in Junee. It is intended that this report form an addendum to the Strategy. This report does not address rural residential land demand or supply. This will be incorporated into the future review of the Strategy. This update on residential land is critical for the following reasons: • the existing strategy identified specific residential land supply targets that need to be reviewed on a regular basis against changes in local population, • the Strategy provided guidance up to 2026 only, and • there is a need to identify when the preparation of a revised strategy is required.

1.2. RECOMMENDATIONS From the updated investigations the following recommendations are made to Council:

1. A full review of the Strategy needs to commence in 2016/17, 2. This review will need to focus on better understanding the role of housing choice in Junee associated with work/live trends occurring in the region and housing and rental affordability 3. The review of the Strategy will need to investigate rural residential land demand and supply, 4. The review of the Strategy will need to examine the future urban footprint for Junee township to avoid “land locking” expansion by current and future rural residential developments, and 5. Council undertake to prepare Structure Plans to identify the potential residential development of Site 3 and 6 as identified in the Strategy and prepare an amendment to the Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 to ensure that these sites are zoned and available for future residential development.

1.2. CURRENT SITUATION The Junee Residential Strategy 2006 was prepared more than 10 years ago.

In between 2006 and 2015 there has been ABS data released for the 2006 and 2011 census periods. Population projections for the Riverina region have also been updated and released by the NSW Department of Planning and Environment and work has commenced on the development of a Regional Infrastructure Plan for the Murray and Riverina regions.

1 | Page

At a local level Council instigated a number of rezonings as recommended in the Strategy in conjunction with the preparation of the Junee Local Environmental Plan 2012 that was supported by the NSW Department of Planning and Environment.

1.3. KEY TRENDS The Strategy made a number of assumptions regarding population and housing changes in the local area using statistical information available at that time.

Table 1 is a summary of those key changes with an indication of the trends associated with revised ABS data.

1.4. HOUSING DEMAND

The Strategy made a number of assumptions regarding housing demand from 2001 to 2026.

These included:

• A growth rate of 1% maintained for that period • A decrease in household size (which has been realised from ABS), and • A total demand for 386 additional dwellings over a 25 year period equal to 14 to15 additional dwellings per year.

In assessing dwelling demand the population and household forecasts, 2011 to 2036, prepared by .id the population experts May 2015, indicate a potential requirement for an additional 482 dwellings within Junee Shire for that period. This equates to an annual demand for an additional 19 dwellings.

Building approvals from ABS regional data indicate that from 2009 to 2013 on average 20 new dwellings were approved per annum in Junee Shire. This would appear to be higher than the current predictions of dwelling demand under the Strategy.

In conjunction with levels of housing demands there are also other changes that need to be considered including the aging-in-place of the existing population and changing household structures. These may be significant population shifts in the future associated with these changes.

Other issues that may impact on the characteristics of housing demand include the role of Junee as a key live/work destination. ABS migration data for Junee indicates that between 2006 and 2011 the top five (5) destinations from migration into Junee Shire (in order of priority) were from Wagga, Temora, Cootamundra, Wingecarribee and Coolamon. Further to this journey to work data that 516 residents who are in full time employment and live in the Junee urban area have identified their primary place of work as Wagga. Alternatively 212 residents of Wagga have identified their place of work as Junee.

2 | Page

This focus on the work/live role of housing in Junee requires further investigation and analysis to identify the key factors influencing those decisions.

One of the more significant issues affecting the Riverina region is housing affordability, particularly the affordable rental market.

The release of the Anglicare Australia Rental Affordability Snapshot in April 2015 highlights the trends in decreasing housing that meets rental affordability demands.

The report indicates that for eight out of ten households on income support there was a substantial decrease in the percentage of rental housing available across the region.

This report also highlights that for minimum wage earners specifically lone households and couples with children the rental market was more affordable however this was limited to only approximately 24% and 45% of total rental market.

While the report identifies that minimum wage earners are in a better position than those on income support, the findings are concerning for Junee. The report highlights the issue of affordable properties being located in towns such as Junee means fewer opportunities for further education and training, and a greater amount of social disadvantage.

From the 2011 ABS approximately 39% of households across Junee Shire earn below the minimum wage which is $640.90 per 38 hour week before tax or $33,326 per annum and unemployment rates were 5%.

It is clear that these issues require further investigation and analysis within Junee. ABS data indicates that there is an increase in rental as a form of tenure in Junee however it is unclear how the rental market is responding to affordability.

1.5 LAND SUPPLY The Strategy identified future housing supply in response to future demands based on site development scenarios for twelve (12) sites in and around Junee.

Table 2 provides a summary of the current status of these twelve (12) sites and the contribution these areas will make to future residential land supply. Sites 10, 11, 12 and 13 are excluded from Table 2 as they relate to industrial and rural residential land supply only.

From Table 2 the potential “englobo” lot supply is within the vicinity of 441 lots. This figure may be reduced due to land requirements for roads, open space and other services associated with subdivision. Assuming a 10% reduction in lots for this reason a total potential residential lot yield of 396 lots would appear to be a reasonable estimate.

3 | Page

A desktop analysis utilising Council’s rating information was undertaken in October 2015 to identify, in conjunction with the Strategy land supply recommendations, the available infill vacant, zoned and subdivided land within the developed areas of Junee.

4 | Page

Table 1 – Summary of key demographic changes Demographic indicator Junee Residential Strategy 2006 Updated 2006 and 2011 ABS Key changes Population growth (actual) 2001 Junee urban area population figure was 3,592 2006 Junee urban area population figure was 3,745 2004 estimate and 2006 actual was 2004 urban area population figure was estimated 2011 Junee urban area population figure was 4,400 154 persons less than predicted at 3,899 Increase from 2001 – 2006 = 153 persons

Increase from 2006 – 2011 = 655 persons Population growth (projected) The Strategy assumes that growth will be Actual ABS identifies current LGA growth rates around Predicted growth rates are lower than maintained at 1% from 2001 to 2026 0.7%. In 2011, the total population of Junee Council anticipated area was estimated to be 6,129 people. It is expected to increase by over 740 people to 6,876 by 2026, at an average annual growth rate of 0.77%. This is based on an increase of over 290 households during the period, with the average number of persons per household rising from 2.51 to 2.51 by 2026. Households (no) LGA level for 2001 = 1,795 households Junee LGA Increase in no of households No Junee urban area figure utilised 2006 –1,819 households consistent with population trends 2011 – 1,887 households In 2006 – 74% of all households Junee urban area located in Junee urban area 2006 – 1,357 households 2011 – 1,545 households In 2011 – 81% of all households located in Junee urban area Households (occupancy) LGA level for 2001 average household size – 2.7 Junee LGA A decline in occupancy rates of all persons 2006 – 2.5 persons dwellings across the Shire 2011 – 2.5 persons

Junee urban area 2006 – 2.5 persons 2011 – 2.5 persons Households (composition) LGA level for 2001 Junee LGA A decrease in household structure from family households to lone person 5 | Page

75% family households 2006 – total 1,819 households households across the Shire. Also 23% lone person households 1300 (71%) family households increase in group households. 2% group households 448 (24%) lone person households 71 (3%) group households

2011 – total 1,887 households 1302 (68%) family households 505 (26%) lone person households 80 (4%) group households

Junee Urban Area

2006 – total 1,357 households

941 (69%) family households 365 (26%) lone person households 51 (3%) group households

2011 – total 1,371 households

909 (66%) family households 406 (29%) lone person households 56 ( 4%) group households Household family composition LGA level in 2001 Junee LGA Decline in couples with children and increase in couples without children 49% couples with children 2006 –1,357 total families across the Shire. Small increase in 34% couples without children 601 (44%) couples with children Junee urban area of one parent 16% one parent families 524 (38%) couples without children families. 1% other 224 (16%) one parent families 11 (0.8%) Other

2011 – 1,368 total families 587 (42%) Couples with children 543 (39%) Couples without children 221 (16%) One parent families

6 | Page

14 (1%) Other

Junee Urban Area

2006 – total families 977 284 (29%) couples with children 361 (36%) couples without children 117 (11%) one parent families 14 (1%) other

2011 – total families 947 279 (29%) couples with children 393 (41%) couples without children 119 (12%) one parent families 8 (0.8%) other Tenure and dwelling structure Unclear which census period used in the Strategy Junee LGA Increase in number of rental however assume 2001 ABS properties and properties being 2006 – Total dwellings – 1,819 purchased. 902 fully owned dwellings (figure seems incorrect 762 fully owned compared to 2006/2011) 607 being purchased 403 being purchased 450 rented 25% rented under various arrangements (no number indicated) 2011- Total dwellings – 1,889 723 fully owned 2001 Junee LGA – Total dwellings – 1,597 642 being purchased 524 rented Corrected figures are: 889 fully owned 403 being purchased 305 being rented

7 | Page

This analysis indicates that there is approximately 199 lots (rates as sewer unconnected and the new residential estate John Potts Drive) exist within the urban areas of Junee with some potential for residential housing development. While this is a conservative estimate even a reduction in 20% of the available infill land stock would mean availability of 159 lots.

The analysis of residential land supply indicates that there is potential for approximately 455 lots that are, and will be, available in the future. This equates, based on current growth rates, to a land bank capable of meeting future demands.

1.6 CONCLUSIONS The assumptions in this report are that those critical actions remaining from the Strategy, to bring forward planning and rezoning of additional residential lands, will be completed by Council.

There is also a need to identify the future strategic urban development directions to ensure that land use decisions associated with non-urban uses do not create barriers to urban expansion of Junee.

There is a need to re-examine rural residential land options across the Shire to ensure that there is sufficient supply to meet this type of lifestyle choice.

Importantly Council needs to start considering the impacts of changes in the local community including household structure, occupancy rates, affordability, ageing the likely future housing demands and needs. This will heavily influence not only attracting residents to the Shire but also providing for the needs of all the local community.

These are provided as recommendations in this report.

8 | Page

Table 2 – Update urban development sites – Junee Residential Land Strategy 2006

Site Page Strategy reference Future Current status Options lots 1 31 Land between Illabo Road and Earl Street along Queen Street 33 Currently zoned RU5 Village Land available for re-subdivision – no Flood liable land west of Earl Street further action 2 38 Land at end of De Salis Drive and Taylor Street 124 Currently zone RU5 Village Land available for re-subdivision – no Flood liable land part of north eastern corner further action 3 41 Land bounded by Albert Street/Roedigers Lane and Kemp 180 Currently zoned R5 Large Lot Residential – Develop Structure Plan to identify future Street/Olympic Highway to the north recommended for investigation for RU5 Village residential development potential zoning 4 45 Land located at end of Hare Street bounded by Hart Street and 17 Currently zoned RU5 Village Land available for re-subdivision and Beach Street1 Within are of ground water vulnerability development – no further action 5 48 Land located north of Golf Ave to Waratah Street 53 Currently zoned RU5 Village Land available for re-subdivision – no Part flood liable and area of salinity further action 6 50 Land located between Harold Street, Albert Street and N/A Currently zone RU1 Options for further investigations as Roedigers Lane recommended by Strategy 7 55 Land located end of Anzac Drive Roman Catholic Church land 20 Currently zoned RU5 Village and subject to DA for Strategy recommended lower density 23 new residential lots and mixed use with aged care housing 8 58 Land located north of Golf Ave (immediately to east of Site 5) As for Currently zoned RU5 Village Land available for re-subdivision – no Site 5 further action 9 61 Land bounded by Pitt Street, Iona Street and Lydia Street to east 14 Currently zoned RU5 Village Land available for re-subdivision – no further action Site 73 Land along Rifle Range Road between George and Church Street N/A Recharge area for Junee – options for change in Not a high priority 14 land use Site 74 Monte Cristo land between John Potts Drive and Loughan Street N/A Currently zoned RU5 Village Land under subdivision development – no 15 further action required TOTAL 441

9 | Page

Junee Shire co uncfl GOAU UTM Zone $$ JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item Subject No. 12[ADDES] DRAFT EXPLORATION CODE OF PRACTICE –

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

October 2015 Consultation Draft Version 1

Published by Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development, Division of Resources & Energy

Title: Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

First published 2015

ISBN:

Published by NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development

For updates to this publication, check www.resourcesandenergy.nsw.gov.au

This Code of Practice forms part of a suite of codes and guidelines that comprise:

 Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

 Exploration Code of Practice: Environmental Management

 Exploration Code of Practice: Produced Water

 Exploration Code of Practice: Rehabilitation

Trim reference: V15/3393

© State of New South Wales through the Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development, 2015. This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in an unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal use or for non-commercial use within your organisation. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (xxxx 2015). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of the NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development or the user’s independent advisor.

Contents

Contents ...... 3 PART A - Introduction ...... 4 Regulatory Purpose ...... 4 When this Code applies ...... 4 Compliance requirements ...... 4 Interaction of Code with other regulation ...... 5 Contact Details ...... 5 Review ...... 5 Part B - Community Consultation ...... 6 Objectives ...... 6 What are the Risks? ...... 6 Mandatory Requirements ...... 7 APPENDIX 1: Guidelines for Community Consultation ...... 12 A.1 Principles ...... 12 A.2 Identification of issues ...... 12 A.3 Undertaking Community Consultation ...... 13 A.4 Records ...... 15 A.5 Monitoring ...... 15 A.6 Community Stakeholder Meetings ...... 15 A.7 Community Liaison Officer ...... 15 A.8 Community Consultative Committees ...... 16 A.9 Community Consultation Plan ...... 16 APPENDIX 2: Annual Community Consultation Report ...... 18 B.1 Annual Community Consultation Report ...... 18 B.2 Reduced Annual Community Consultation Report ...... 19 B.3 Annual Community Consultation Report Checklist ...... 20 B.4 Reduced Annual Community Consultation Report Checklist ...... 21 APPENDIX 3: Steps to Develop a Community Consultation Strategy ...... 22 APPENDIX 4: Notification requirements under the Mining Act 1992 and the Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991...... 23 APPENDIX 5: Definitions...... 25

PART A - Introduction

Regulatory Purpose Exploration licences and assessment leases for all resources (prospecting titles) are granted with the objective of encouraging ecologically sustainable development, social responsibility and building economic wealth for the people of NSW. This Code of Practice (this Code) sets out mandatory requirements and provides title holders with related guidance regarding the expected performance for engagement in adequate, inclusive and appropriate community consultation in relation to the planning for, and conduct of, activities under a prospecting title. This Code serves two purposes: 1. it provides upfront information to the Industry and the Community; and 2. it sets out enforceable mandatory requirements related to community consultation. This Code enables industry to:  adopt a risk-based approach to ensure compliance with mandatory requirements related to community consultation;  commit to measurable performance standards;  monitor performance and take corrective action if outcomes are not being achieved; and  keep and maintain relevant records of activities and/or actions. This approach allows title holders to adopt innovative solutions and best practice techniques to meet performance requirements.

When this Code applies This Code will be applied by a condition imposed on all prospecting titles granted, renewed or transferred in respect of applications received after 1 July 2015.

Compliance requirements This Code applies to the extent provided for under the conditions of a prospecting title. The guidance in Appendix 1 provides context to the mandatory requirements and options for the type of controls that could be used by title holders, where relevant, to meet these requirements. Based on the likely impact, type and scale, phase and duration of exploration activities, this guidance, and any updates or new standards related to community consultation, may be used to measure and assess performance during the term of a prospecting title. If compliance with this Code is required by the conditions of a prospecting title, then a breach of this Code will be an offence under section 378D of the Mining Act 1992 or section 136A of the Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 (as relevant). From 1 July 2015, under the NSW Gas Plan, the Environment Protection Authority is the sole authority to regulate compliance with and enforcement of all conditions (excluding work health and safety) contained within petroleum titles. This includes any conditions imposed in relation to specific activity approvals. The Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development (the Department) is responsible for regulating compliance for all other matters relating to prospecting titles under the Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 and the Mining Act 1992. The Department's approach to compliance and enforcement is set out in its Compliance and Enforcement Policy. Compliance with this Code is not a defence to actions taken under any legislation or statutory instrument.

4 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

Interaction of Code with other regulation In accordance with title conditions, titleholders are required to: (1) carry out activities in accordance with an approved work program. Work programs are to be prepared in accordance with the Exploration Guideline: Work Programs for Prospecting Titles, and include details of the community consultation activities to be undertaken over the term of the title. (2) submit annual activity reports prepared in accordance with the Exploration Guideline: Annual Activity Reporting for Prospecting Titles. This Guideline requires submission of an Annual Community Consultation Report about the activities the titleholder has carried out over the past year. This report is to be consistent with the work program and is to comply with this Code.

Contact Details Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development Division of Resources and Energy Compliance and Enforcement Branch 516 High Street, Maitland NSW 2320 PO Box 244, Hunter Region Mail Centre, NSW 2310 Telephone 02 4931 6401 Fax 02 4931 6793 Email [email protected] Website www.resourcesandenergy.nsw.gov.au

Review This Code will be reviewed after the first year of publication, and then every five years. The effectiveness of this Code will also be monitored on an ongoing basis.

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 5

Part B - Community Consultation

Objectives It is essential that community consultation for all exploration is undertaken in a way that ensures:  that title holders implement a community consultation strategy that is appropriate and adequate to manage risks associated with conflict with community and other stakeholders;  that title holders are aware of their obligations in relation to the implementation of a community consultation strategy and the monitoring of this strategy through the annual community consultation report;  the adoption of standards that ensure the regular review of the process of community consultation and the application of the community consultation strategy.

What are the Risks? Without undertaking a process of adequate, inclusive and appropriate community consultation, exploration activities will fail to gain the ‘social licence to operate’. This social licence to operate is the recognised as the level of acceptance or approval continually granted to an organisation's operations or project by local community and other stakeholders. Without gaining and maintaining this licence, and undertaking a robust and accountable community consultation process there is a risk that title holders will face potential negative impacts including:  a lack of community trust and support;  a failure to be able to address community misconceptions and misinformation;  lost productivity, and time and cost impacts due to project delays or disruption;  the cost of additional staff time needed when conflict arises or escalates;  opportunity costs arising from the inability to pursue future projects or opportunities for expansion;  inability to attract the best employees who may choose to work for a company that is a better corporate citizen;  ongoing legal challenge to projects or activities;  inability to follow-up effectively on commitments or respond to complaints;  a failure to be able to comply with the annual activity reporting requirements relating to community consultation. To prevent or mitigate the risk of these potential impacts occurring, the following mandatory requirements apply to NSW exploration activities.

6 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

Mandatory Requirements

1 Prior to commencing any activity authorised by an exploration licence the title holder must prepare a community consultation strategy. 2 The community consultation strategy must: (a) establish the objectives of the strategy; (b) establish the impact level of each exploration activity as high, medium or low in accordance with Table 1: Activity Impact Assessment; (c) include a detailed description and analysis of all potential community stakeholders which identifies (i) that stakeholders likely to be impacted by the proposed activity (potential community stakeholders). This must include (at a minimum) stakeholders identified in accordance with Table 2: Minimum Identified Community Stakeholders for Activity Impact Levels; (ii) the nature of the likely impact that each proposed exploration activity will have on the potential community stakeholders: and (iii) the likely areas of concern of each potential community stakeholder group. (d) describe how community consultation will be undertaken to ensure: (i) that individuals, communities and stakeholder groups are provided with reasonable information to understand the nature of the project, and the likely impacts and benefits that may be derived from the project operations; (ii) that title holders are able to recognise and address community concerns early; (iii) that identified community stakeholders are informed of the proposed schedule for implementing the work program for the licence and notified prior to the commencement relevant activities; and (iv) that community consultation feedback will be monitored and responded to. (e) set out mechanisms for revising the community consultation strategy to ensure it continues to meet the requirements of this Code. At a minimum these must include if: (i) community consultation feedback indicates that the strategy is failing to meet the objectives of this Code; (ii) significant events occur which change the impact level of any aspect of the activity identified in Table 1: Activity Impact Assessment; (iii) the nature of the activity changes the impact level of any aspect of the activity identified in Table 1: Activity Impact Assessment; or (iv) the community consultation strategy, as identified through the consideration of the Annual Community Consultation Report, is deemed to be inadequate. 3 The title holder must implement and comply with the community consultation strategy as revised from time to time in accordance with this Code. 4 The title holder must keep and maintain the records set out in Table 3: Records as updated from time to time.

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 7

Notes:

 Appendix 1 provides the general guidance for undertaking adequate, inclusive and appropriate community consultation.

 Appendix 2 provides guidance and a checklist of requirements for the preparation of an Annual Community Consultation Report.

 Appendix 3 provides a checklist of questions that should be considered when preparing a community consultation strategy while Appendix 4 outlines the steps to the development of a community consultation strategy.

 The definitions of terms used in this Code are set out in Appendix 6.

8 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

Table 1: Activity Impact Assessment Low Impact Medium Impact High Impact 1 Level of community Low level of community interest with no Intermediate level of community interest with Significant public concern about project interest in project relevant, local community interest groups locally known, relevant community interest and involvement of regional/national identified groups identified community interest groups. Score 0 10 20 2 Activity type Maximum density of drilling activities across Maximum density of drilling activities across Maximum density of drilling activities title: 1-5 holes per sq. km.; title: 6-20 holes per sq. km; across title: 20+ holes per sq. km; or Note: if an activity is not Literature review, reprocessing existing Explosive or thumper-truck based seismic Other activities not covered under the identified, the discretion of the date, interpreting and modelling surveys; provisions for low or medium impact title holder can be used to assess the likely impact of the geoscientific data, and other desktop Excavating or bulk sampling not exceeding proposed activity. This should be activities; 60 cubic metres; detailed in the Annual Geological mapping; Non-intensive drilling involving no more than Community Consultation Report Surface sampling and coring using hand moderate site preparation, excluding holes and Community Consultation held equipment; exceeding 400 mm in diameter; Plan (where required). Ground geophysical surveys and downhole Access tracks, drill pads or line clearing logging, but not seismic surveys; involving no more than moderate native Airborne surveys; or vegetation disturbance; Vehicle access that does not require Moderate clearing or cutting of vegetation; construction of new tracks. or Minor excavations excluding costeaning or bulk sampling.

Score 0 5 10 3 Population density of Sparsely populated area (activity within a Intermediately populated area (activity Largely populated area (activity within a statistical local area statistical local area with <10,000 within a statistical local area with 10,000 – statistical local area >40,000 population)* population)* 40,000 population)* Score 0 1 2 4 Location - dwellings Activity within 5km of cluster <100 dwellings Activity within 5km of cluster 100-1000 Activity within 10km of cluster >1000 dwellings dwellings Score 0 1 2 5 Location – sensitive Activity within 15km of a sensitive receiver Activity within 10km of a sensitive receiver Activity within 5km of a sensitive receiver receivers(excluding (excluding dwellings) (excluding dwellings) (excluding dwellings) dwellings) Score 0 1 2 6 Location – Sensitive Activity within 15km of a sensitive Activity within 10km of a sensitive Activity within 5km of a sensitive environment environment environment environment Score 0 1 2

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 9

Low Impact Medium Impact High Impact 7 Cumulative impact Other extractive industries, mining or Other extractive industries, mining or Other extractive industries, mining or petroleum production located within 50- petroleum production located within 25- petroleum production located within 25km 100km of activity 50km of activity of activity Score 0 1 2 8 Spatial environmental, Limited potential for damage to <1ha Potential for damage <10ha Significant and widespread potential for water or air quality impact damage >10ha Score 0 1 2 9 Temporal environmental, Temporary impacts of activity<6 months Non-persistent impacts of activity without Major disruption to the capacity of the water or air quality impact relatively easily rehabilitated long term loss or change habitat to recover without significant rehabilitation over medium to long term Score 0 1 2 10 Visual impacts Minor and short term <6 months interruption Significant but temporary <24 months Some long term impacts/major disruption to appreciation potential of view or reduction interruption of appreciation potential of view to appreciation potential of view without <10%, easily mitigated or minor <10% reduction of appreciation significant mitigation measures > 2years or potential of view capable of being mitigated. permanent reduction in appreciation potential of view 10-50% Score 0 1 2 Total Score 0-15 16-25 26+

Note: The activity impact level is determined by the addition of scores for all the categories (1 – 10) in the matrix above. The Total Score will then indicate the assessed level of activity impact in relation to the provisions of the Code of Practice.

*Population distribution for local statistical areas can be found at http://www.atlas.nsw.gov.au/public/nsw/home/map/australia-population.html

.

10 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

Table 2: Minimum Identified Community Stakeholders for Activity Impact Levels

Category Community Stakeholder Low Medium High Impact Impact Impact

Landholders of the site of the activity    Neighbouring landholders, residents and    businesses Landholders and residents within 10km of the    operational area Landholders and residents within 20km of the    operational area Neighbouring title holders    Title holders within 10km of the operational    area Local community groups    Regional, state or national public interest    groups Local environment groups and Catchment    groups Cultural bodies (historic or indigenous)    Local chamber of commerce    Native title holders or claimants (where    operations affect claimable land) Local government    Local NSW Government Members    Relevant government agencies   

Table 3: Records

Mandatory Types of Records Requirements 2 Community consultation strategy as revised from time to time in accordance with this Code. 2 (d) Details of the community consultation activities undertaken including how the community was involved and the methods used 2 (d)(iv) Feedback and complaints raised by stakeholders How feedback and complaints raised by stakeholders has been responded to

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 11

APPENDIX 1: Guidelines for Community Consultation The following guidance provides assistance to title holders on how they may achieve compliance with the mandatory requirements. This guidance does not impose any additional mandatory requirements. The applicability of certain parts of this guidance will vary depending on the likely risk, type and scale, phase and duration of exploration activities. Title holders should note that the guidelines outlined below (as amended or replaced from time to time), in addition to any new guidelines taken to set out best practice relating to community consultation, may be used to measure and assess community consultation undertakings for compliance and enforcement purposes during the term of a prospecting title. In this document:

Community consultation strategy means the establishment of a process of community consultation that considers the stakeholders, methods of communication, and the monitoring of, and response to, consultation events. It provides an identification of what you seek to achieve whilst recognising that there may be uncertainty in the process of achieving it.

Community consultation plans are action documents that guide title holders in undertaking and reporting on community consultations. They provide the details of how you will get to where you want to be.

A.1 Principles (1) Community consultation should be undertaken in accordance with the following principles: (a) Integrity: consultation should be open and transparent to enable stakeholders to participate in a meaningful way. (b) Inclusiveness: consultation should be accessible and balanced, and reasonable attempts made to also include stakeholders that may be harder to reach, to ensure a full range of values and perspectives is obtained. (c) Responsive and reciprocal: consultation should promote dialogue and be supported by timely and accurate information. (d) Respect: stakeholders should be valued and title holders should seek to use their input to improve outcomes by actively listening to, and attempting to understand, stakeholder needs, and seeking to understand how they wish to be engaged. (e) Accountability: ongoing processes should be established to monitor, evaluate and disclose information, including processes to track and communicate decisions and activities in a reliable, accurate and clear manner.

A.2 Identification of issues (1) The title holder should undertake and provide evidence of the following: (a) analysis of the key issues of concern to the identified stakeholders; (b) how the community consultation that was undertaken sought to respond to these issues; (c) the outcomes of the community consultation in response to these issues; (d) any changes to a community consultation plan or strategy required as a result of the issues raised; (e) whether the issues are likely to continue to be of concern during the next

12 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

reporting period; and (f) how future community consultation will respond to the issues, or any new issues likely to be raised. Note: Issues of concern may change as the activity changes, for example, when on-ground exploration activities commence.

A.3 Undertaking Community Consultation (1) Community consultation should: (a) be undertaken in accordance with the minimum community consultation requirements identified in Table 4: Minimum Community Consultation Requirements for Activity Impact Levels; (b) be timely, accessible, planned and with clear objectives; (c) provide information in plain language, (d) be undertaken through activities that overcome barriers to public participation; (e) ensure that the expected level of participation and commitment are clearly expressed to the stakeholders; (f) establish channels of communication to allow community feedback and identification of potential issues; (g) include processes for the provision of feedback to participants on the results of their contribution; and (h) review and evaluate with the community the effectiveness of the engagement strategies. (2) Consultation procedures and processes should be designed to: (a) maximise opportunities for title holders, individuals, communities and stakeholder groups to engage in a meaningful way; (b) promote and support processes for effective representation by title holders, individuals, communities and stakeholder groups in the engagement process; (c) develop tailored approaches that support engagement opportunities; (d) promote stakeholder confidence in exploration project management by ensuring open and transparent discussion of project development processes, technical studies, impacts and risk management processes; and (e) enhance opportunities for sustainable exploration project design and decision-making by incorporating local community knowledge, views and concerns in technical studies, project design and decision making, where appropriate, (3) The frequency and format of community consultation should have regard to: (a) community stakeholder values, concerns and attitudes; (b) community stakeholder expectations in regard to balanced and objective information; (c) the stage of the exploration project and potential impacts arising from activities at each stage; (d) the level of community stakeholder interest in the exploration project or industry;

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 13

(e) the existing relationship with the community stakeholders; and (f) the requirements of individual community stakeholders and groups, and should consider different levels of engagement for different community stakeholders and groups. Note: Early engagement with stakeholders will assist explorers to identify the best way of interacting and engaging with the stakeholders as the process progresses.

Table 4: Minimum Community Consultation Requirements for Activity Impact Levels

Category Community Consultation Action or Event Low Medium High Impact Impact Impact Respond to correspondence/submissions    Pamphlet distribution of relevant information    including advising of the undertaking of the activity Letter box drop of relevant information including    advising of the undertaking of the activity Publish notice in community/Council newsletter    advising of the undertaking of the activity Publish notice in Local newspaper advising of    the undertaking of the activity Publish notice in state-wide newspaper advising    of the undertaking of the activity Issue local media release advising of the    undertaking of the activity Displays i.e. in local library, shopfronts    Dedicated website/page    Dedicated project email address    Hotline/phone in    Letter to key stakeholders and community    groups inviting comment Public exhibition of information associated with    the activity and timing of works Social media    Community stakeholder meetings Hold meetings/Interview with key individuals    Hold meeting with local    committees/organisations Hold open community forum/ public meeting    Hold site tour/meeting   

Note: Where a communications option is unavailable in a local area, for example no Council newsletter, or unavailability of shopfront display, an alternative may be selected but this should be documented and justified in the relevant Community Consultation Strategy or Annual Community Consultation Report..

14 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

A.4 Records (1) In addition to those matters identified in Mandatory Requirement 4, the title holder should keep a record of the following: (a) at what stage(s) of the exploration project the community was engaged; (b) how the community was involved and the methods used; (c) what the community consultation program and activities expected to achieve; (d) details of feedback provided to the community stakeholders as a result of the activities undertaken; and (e) how the consultation procedures or processes have been amended. (2) Records kept in accordance with A.4 (1) above should be kept up-to-date and be made publicly available, where practicable.

A.5 Monitoring (1) Records kept in accordance with A.4 Records above should be used to: (a) consider compliance with the objectives of the community consultation strategy; (b) identify issues that were not anticipated in the development of the strategy; (c) identify stakeholders who’s needs are not being adequately or appropriately addressed; and (d) identify any revisions required to the community consultation strategy in accordance with Mandatory Requirement 2(e).

A.6 Community Stakeholder Meetings (1) Community stakeholder meetings should be held at various times of day, not only during business hours, to ensure that the maximum number of stakeholders are given the opportunities to attend; (2) Where only one stakeholder meeting is to occur at a particular stage, an additional alternative consultation opportunity should be considered, for example a webinar or podcast of presentations, at a different time of day. For example if a meeting is held during business hours, a webinar should be held outside of business hours.

A.7 Community Liaison Officer (1) Where an activity is identified as High Impact the title holder should consider the appointment of a person with a particular responsibility to engage with the community, for example a community liaison officer. (2) The community liaison officer should be skilled and experienced in the undertaking of the role. (3) The person identified in provision A.7 (1) above should have the following responsibilities: (a) facilitating community meetings; (b) responding to questions, comments and complaints in a timely and thorough manner; and (c) maintaining electronic media (including social media and webpages) to ensure that information is accurate and up-to-date.

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 15

A.8 Community Consultative Committees (1) For activities identified as High Impact, title holders should consider the establishment of a Community Consultative Committee. (2) Where the title holder operates another licence within the local government area, or within 20km of the title, community consultation can be undertaken utilising any existing Community Consultative Committee if appropriate (i.e. if the same stakeholder groups are affected). Note: Refer to the Department of Planning and Environment’s Guidelines for Establishing and Operating Community Consultative Committees for Mining Projects (June 2007), for further details on establishing a Community Consultative Committee.

A.9 Community Consultation Plan (1) A title holder may choose to prepare a Community Consultation Plan where activities are identified as High Impact. (2) The Community Consultation Plan should be: (a) in plain language; and (b) publicly accessible both electronically and in hard copy. (3) The Community Consultation Plan should include, as a minimum: (a) objectives of the consultation process; (b) roles and responsibilities; (c) identification and analysis of community stakeholders, in accordance with Mandatory Requirement 2 (c); (d) identification of community stakeholder risks and opportunities, attitudes and expectations; (e) at what stage of the project community engagement did, or will, commence; (f) the frequency and format of consultation; (g) process for responding to consultation responses; (h) complaints management; (i) timeframes for consultation events; and (j) monitoring, review and reporting procedures; and (4) The community consultation plan title page should include: (a) document title; (b) application/licence number; (c) exploration project name or location; (d) project operator; (e) date of document; and (f) author including contact details and position. (5) The Community Consultation Plan is to be reviewed, and updated where necessary should:

16 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

(a) significant events occur; (b) the nature of the activity change; (c) significant public concern is raised about the project; or (d) consultation, as identified through the consideration of the Community Consultation Annual Report, be deemed to be inadequate. (6) Notwithstanding A.9 (5) above, the community consultation plan should be reviewed and updated upon renewal of the title. (7) Updated and amended Community Consultation Plans should be submitted to the Division of Resources and Energy as appendices to Annual Community Consultation Reports to demonstrate compliance with the community consultation strategy to be considered.

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 17

APPENDIX 2: Annual Community Consultation Report

B.1 Annual Community Consultation Report (1) An Annual Community Consultation Report must be submitted to the Division of Resources and Energy within 30 days of the anniversary of the grant of the exploration licence, in conjunction with other annual reports. (2) The Annual Community Consultation Report title page must include: (a) report title; (b) licence number; (c) original grant date and expiry date; (d) the reporting period; (e) project name or location; (f) project operator and Authority holder; (g) date of report; and (h) author, including contact details and position. (3) The Annual Community Consultation Report must include, as a minimum: (a) consideration of compliance with any Community Consultation Strategy and Community Consultation Plan (if applicable); (b) a (maximum) one page executive summary outlining the objectives, consultation undertaken and outcomes achieved during the reporting period; (c) detailed descriptions and analysis of the identified community stakeholders; (d) the objectives, details, date and time of any community consultation events, including issues raised and responses given; (e) records of consultation with relevant government agencies including local councils, the names of representatives, and the dates of the meetings; (f) what was discussed and issues raised at any consultation events; (g) how feedback was collected; (h) responses to issues raised; (i) summary of comments received in relation to the exploration activity, and actions taken to address any complaints; (j) outcomes of the consultation and an assessment of how well the objectives were met; and (k) proposed future consultation.

18 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

B.2 Reduced Annual Community Consultation Report (1) Where no on-ground exploration activities have occurred and consequently limited community consultation has been undertaken, and limited activities are proposed in the next reporting period, a reduced Annual Community Consultation Report can be submitted, indicating the reasons for the reduced level of consultation. Notes: Community consultation should still occur whether on-ground exploration activities occur or not. It is important to engage with the community to explain the processes being undertaken, and when they may expect on-ground activities to commence. The checklists at B.3 Annual Community Consultation Report Checklist and B.4 Reduced Annual Community Consultation Report Checklist provide minimum requirements for the annual community consultation reports.

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 19

B.3 Annual Community Consultation Report Checklist

Requirement Yes No

Title page ☐ ☐  report title; ☐ ☐  licence number; ☐ ☐  original grant date/expiry date; ☐ ☐  the reporting period; ☐ ☐  exploration project name or location; ☐ ☐  project operator/title holder; ☐ ☐  date of report; ☐ ☐  author, including contact details and position ☐ ☐ Executive summary ☐ ☐ [A summary of consultation and outcomes achieved during the reporting period.] Community consultation undertaken in reporting period ☐ ☐ [A detailed summary of engagement with impacted landholders and community groups.]  details of who was consulted and why ☐ ☐  details of consultation ☐ ☐  dates and times ☐ ☐  objectives of community consultation events ☐ ☐  what was discussed and issues raised ☐ ☐ Government agency consultation undertaken in reporting period ☐ ☐ [A detailed summary of engagement with relevant government agencies (including local councils)]  details of consultation ☐ ☐  dates and times ☐ ☐  objectives of community consultation events ☐ ☐  what was discussed and issues raised ☐ ☐ Consideration of compliance with any Community Consultation ☐ ☐ Strategy and Community Consultation Plan (if relevant) How feedback was collected ☐ ☐ Responses to issues raised ☐ ☐ Summary of comments received in relation to the exploration ☐ ☐ activity Summary and nature of complaints and actions taken to address ☐ ☐ them If the activity has been altered in response to issues raised ☐ ☐ Outcomes of the consultation ☐ ☐ Assessment of how well objectives were met ☐ ☐ Commitments for further consultation ☐ ☐

20 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

B.4 Reduced Annual Community Consultation Report Checklist

Requirement Yes No

Title page ☐ ☐  report title; ☐ ☐  licence number; ☐ ☐  original grant date/expiry date; ☐ ☐  the reporting period; ☐ ☐  exploration project name or location; ☐ ☐  project operator/title holder; ☐ ☐  date of report; ☐ ☐  author, including contact details and position ☐ ☐ Reason for reduced consultation ☐ ☐ Details of any consultation undertaken in reporting period ☐ ☐ Responses to any issues raised ☐ ☐ Summary and nature of complaints received and actions taken to ☐ ☐ address them

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 21

APPENDIX 3: Steps to Develop a Community Consultation Strategy

STEP 1 Consider activity impact

STEP 2 Identify stakeholders

STEP 3 Identify stakeholder attitudes, issues and expectations

STEP 4 Assess level of stakeholder impact

STEP 5 Decide on stakeholder input

STEP 6 Determine level and type of stakeholder engagement

STEP 7 Engage stakeholders

STEP 8 Review and action feedback and ongoing monitor

22 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

APPENDIX 4: Notification requirements under the Mining Act 1992 and the Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 The Mining Act 1992, and the Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 require notification of an application to be published under the following circumstances, and in accordance with the relevant regulations. These statutory requirements for notification and consultation are in addition to the requirements of this Code of Practice.

Application Type When Where

Petroleum Before or with 21 days after lodging an Both a State wide and local assessment lease application [section 36] newspaper

Petroleum production Before or with 21 days after lodging an State wide newspaper lease application [section 43]

Coal and Minerals Within 14 days after lodging an Both a State wide and local exploration licence application [section 13A], or 45 days of newspaper confirmation of lodgement of the application [clause 15]

Coal and Minerals Within 14 days after lodging an Both a State wide and local assessment lease application [section 33A], or 45 days of newspaper confirmation of lodgement of the application [clause 21]

Coal and Minerals Within 14 days after lodging an Both a State wide and local mining lease application [section 51A], or 45 days of newspaper confirmation of lodgement of the application [clause 25]

Content Such notices are to contain the following:  a statement that an application for the relevant licence/lease has been, or will be lodged;  information sufficient to lead to the ready identification of the area of land over which the lease is sought including: o a plan of the proposed area o a description of that area [petroleum]; and o a statement indicating the approximate direction and approximate distance of the town nearest to that area [petroleum].

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 23

Related Guidelines The notification should be published in accordance with the:  Guideline for the Publication of a Notice of an Application for an Exploration Licence;  Guideline for the Publication of a Notice of an Application for an Exploration Licence for Coal,  Guideline for the Publication of a Notice of an Application for a Mining Lease;  Guideline for the Publication of a Notice of an Application for a Petroleum Exploration Licence; or  Guideline for the Publication of a Notice of an Application for a Petroleum Special Prospecting Authority.

24 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation

APPENDIX 5: Definitions

In this Code of Practice:

(1) Reference to a document in this Code of Practice is a reference to that document as amended or replaced from time to time. (2) Terms in Column 1 of the following Table A1.1 have the meaning set out in Column 2:

Table A1.1: Definitions

Column 1 Column 2 Activity means exploration (prospecting) operation or activity associated with a prospecting title, which includes exploration licences, assessment leases, petroleum exploration licences, petroleum assessment leases and petroleum special prospecting authorities Critical habitat Has the same meaning as it has in the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 or Fisheries Management Act 1994 (as relevant). Environmentally Means sensitive area of State (a) coastal waters of the State, or significance (b) land to which State Environmental Planning Policy No 14—Coastal Wetlands or State Environmental Planning Policy No 26—Littoral Rainforests applies, or (c) land reserved as an aquatic reserve under the Fisheries Management Act 1994 or as a marine park under the Marine Parks Act 1997, or (d) land within a wetland of international significance declared under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands or within a World heritage area declared under the World Heritage Convention, or (e) land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance, or (f) land reserved as a state conservation area under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, or (g) land, places, buildings or structures listed on the State Heritage Register, or (h) land reserved or dedicated under the Crown Lands Act 1989 for the preservation of flora, fauna, geological formations or for other environmental protection purposes, or (i) land identified as being critical habitat under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 or Part 7A of the Fisheries Management Act 1994. High Impact* means significant, repetitive, regular or frequent aspects of the project that will affect people’s lives and lifestyles (such as excessive noise and dust) exacerbated due to proximity, or perceived significant environmental, amenity or social impacts. Likely to have a high level of community interest and create community controversy or conflict. For example, petroleum exploration. Medium impact* means occasional, or regular but infrequent aspects to the project that may be partial or avoidable/manageable. They have the potential for some controversy or conflict and may affect attributes that are of high value to the community or their lifestyle. For example, seismic surveys or bulk sampling in close proximity to residences. Low impact* means infrequent and very occasional impacts of the project with no or low risk of controversy. For example, small scale minerals exploration*. Sensitive receiver Includes:  dwellings;  libraries;  educational and research institutions (including schools, colleges and universities);  childcare centres;  kindergartens;  hospitals, surgeries and other medical institutions;

Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation 25

 places of worship;  milking sheds and holding yards associated with dairies;  animal boarding or training establishments;  aquaculture;  intensive livestock agriculture; and  land identified as critical habitat. Sensitive Includes a watercourse, threatened species, population, or ecological environment community, or other environmentally sensitive area of State significance as defined by the State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007. Threatened species, has the same meaning as it has in the Threatened Species Conservation populations, or Act 1995 or Fisheries Management Act 1994, as relevant. ecological communities Watercourse A river, estuary or lake as defined in the Water Management Act 2000.

* The impact of the activity and project should be determined using Table 1: Activity Impact Assessment

26 Draft Exploration Code of Practice: Community Consultation JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

2015

Item Subject No. 14[ADDES] NSW DISABILITY INCLUSION ACTION PLANNING

GUIDELINES

NSW Disability Inclusion Action Planning Guidelines Acknowledgements

The Department of Family and Community Services (FACS) recognises and thanks all those individuals, departments and organisations that have contributed to the development of the NSW Disability Inclusion Action Planning Guidelines, particularly members of the NSW National Disability Strategy Implementation Committee. FACS recognises the work of Urbis in supporting the research and consultation process and the initial drafting of these guidelines. The quotes and practice examples provided throughout these guidelines have been captured from participants at various consultations and through the provision of case studies, to inform the development of the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan and Disability Inclusion Planning Guidelines.

Front cover photo credits: Top-left image: courtesy of Guide Dogs NSW/ACT. Top-right image: George Liosatos, self-portrait collage, Roomies ArtSpace Encore Group Exhibition, Damien Minton Gallery, February 2014 – photo courtesy of Ric Bolzan. Bottom-right image: courtesy of St Scholastica’s College, Glebe. Contents

Acknowledgements 2 Front cover photo credits: 2 Contents 3 Introduction 5 Inclusion policy and legislation 5 Flexibility in application 6 A new approach 7 2 How to use these guidelines 8 3 Overview of Disability Inclusion Action Plans 9 3.1 The case for inclusion 9 3.2 Policy and legislative context 10 3.2.1 NSW Disability reforms 10 3.2.2 Overarching policy and legislation 11 3.2.3 Other relevant legislation 12 3.2.4 The role for Disability Inclusion Action Plans 16 3.3 Key outcome areas 16 3.3.1 Attitudes and behaviours 16 3.3.2 Liveable communities 17 3.3.3 Employment 18 3.3.4 Systems and processes 20 4 Disability Inclusion Action Plan outline 22 5 Step by step plan for Action Plan development & implementation 24 5.1 Allocate executive ownership and responsibility 24 5.2 Map your functions, facilities, services and information sources 25 5.3 Determine governance and accountability arrangements 25 5.4 Consultation and co-design with customers, staff and the community 26 5.4.1 Plan the consultation 27 5.4.2 Select appropriate consultation methods 28 5.4.3 Decide who to engage 29 5.4.4 Ensure full accessibility 29 Additional Resources - Consultation 30 5.4.5 Report on the consultation 30 5.5 Undertake disability inclusion action planning 31 5.6 Develop risk mitigation strategy 31 5.7 Prepare a monitoring and reporting strategy 32 5.8 Plan for continual engagement 33 5.9 Publish your Action Plan 33 5.10 Promote the Action Plan to staff and the community 34 5.11 Evaluation 34 5.12 Initial support 35 6 Additional resources 36 6.1 Links and resources 36 6.2 Suggested reporting template 38 7 References 39 8 Abbreviations 40 Introduction

New South Wales (NSW) is entering a new era in disability inclusion planning. This reflects a renewed commitment to the importance of inclusion in building a strong and equitable community in NSW. The NSW Government is committed to supporting the fundamental right of choice for people with disability. People with disability must have the same right to choose the way to live their lives, to access the same opportunities and enjoy the benefits of living and working in our society. NSW is ensuring the mainstream services it provides are accessible. This underpins disability inclusion planning in the NSW public sector.

Inclusion policy and legislation

The Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (DIA) demonstrates the ongoing commitment of the NSW Government to building an inclusive community and requires the government to produce a Disability Inclusion Plan. The NSW Disability Inclusion Plan supports the DIA and provides a strategy to implement the Act’s objects and principles across government and the community. Disability Inclusion Action Plans (Action Plans) also mandated by the DIA, play a critical role in promoting the ethos of inclusion and provide the practical measures by which intent is transformed into action by agencies and local government. Action Plans will outline the practical steps NSW Government agencies will put in place to breakdown barriers and promote access to services, information and employment and promote the rights of people with disability. The social model of disability, outlined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), states people with disability are not disabled by their impairment but by the barriers in the community that prevent them gaining equal access to information, services, transport, housing, education, training, employment, and social opportunities. The NSW Government will provide a positive role model of inclusion for other sectors of the community. Analysis indicates that there are significant economic reasons for increasing the inclusiveness of our society. There are financial gains for both individuals and for the economy by moving people into productive and fulfilling employment and by reducing modification costs through inclusive planning and the application of universal design principles. It is the social responsibility of the NSW community to work to remove the barriers, so that people with disability can fully participate in community life, with less reliance on others and on specialist services. The National Disability Strategy 2010-20 (NDS) identifies the key priorities and associated actions to remove barriers in its whole-of-government plan. The NSW NDS Implementation Plan 2012-2014 was the NSW response to the NDS. Whilst some actions under this plan are continuing, the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan sets the new framework for inclusion in NSW. The Disability Inclusion Act 2014 defines disability as: ‘The long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment which in interaction with various barriers may hinder the full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.’ This definition reinforces the importance of viewing disability as the result of interaction between people living with a range of impairments and their physical and social environment. Disability is not just about the impairment. The onus to break down barriers rests with the whole community.

Disability action planning is not a new approach. Since the introduction of the NSW Disability Services Act 1993 (DSA), all NSW government departments and some other government bodies have been required to undertake disability action planning. The DIA replaces the DSA, and strengthens the commitment to inclusion, consultation with people with disability and protection of their rights. These guidelines apply to all NSW government departments, some other government agencies and statutory bodies which are included in the Disability Inclusion Regulation 2014 and local councils. The term ‘public authority’ is used throughout these guidelines to describe these entities. Of course all other bodies or organisations that are not required to make Action Plans by law, but which choose to do so, can follow these guidelines too. Under the Disability Inclusion Regulation 2014, public authorities that are required to have Action Plans are required to have them in place by 1 December 2015. Local councils are to have Action Plans in place by 1 July 2017. A number of public authorities may already have plans in place that meet the criteria of a Disability Inclusion Action Plan under these guidelines. There have been many major successes of disability action planning over the years, contributing to improved access and inclusion for people with disability, however there remains significant scope for improvement. These guidelines focus on increasing consultation and involvement of people with disability throughout the planning and implementation phases.

Flexibility in application

These guidelines are intended as a tool to assist with the development of Action Plans. The guidelines are provided to ensure that there is a concerted whole of government, whole of community approach in addressing the areas that people with disability have identified as priorities. While the guidelines are aligned with the areas of focus of the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan, it is recognised that all public authorities will need to operate within their own legislative and compliance framework established by the laws, standards and good practices that guide delivery of government services. The guidelines provide a framework that accommodates the major focus areas for inclusion and provide an approach to addressing issues through engagement, planning and co-design of solutions. It is recognised that flexibility within the provision of service delivery and infrastructure will be required to ensure the needs of all people with disability are considered in providing services. The Department of Family and Community Services (FACS) will work with NSW public authorities to support the development of initial Action Plans by December 2015 and their implementation and review over time. FACS will also work with the Department of Planning and Environment, Office of Local Government and Local Government NSW to develop specific resources and supports to allow councils to integrate action planning within their Community Strategic Planning and Delivery Program cycle by June 2017.

‘Inclusion means I can pass a course and get another level of qualification and pursue equal opportunity employment.’ Case study participant

A new approach

Key changes from the 2008 guidelines include: ■ Name – Previously known as Disability Action Plans the DIA now requires NSW public authorities to have Disability Inclusion Action Plans (Action Plans). ■ Legislative basis – The Disability Services Act 1993, has been replaced by the Disability Inclusion Act, which requires all government departments and certain public authorities (as defined in the DIA) in NSW to have a Disability Inclusion Action Plan. ■ Key focus areas – The four areas are aligned to the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan, to ensure Action Plans align with the areas identified by people with disability as the priority for concerted and sustained attention. ■ Consultation – A greater emphasis on consultation at all stages of planning, implementation and monitoring and direction on how to conduct inclusive consultation with stakeholders, staff and the community have been included. ■ Governance – Highlighting the importance of ensuring governance and accountability are in place at the outset and advice on designing governance and accountability arrangements to encourage effective implementation.

2 How to use these guidelines

These guidelines have been arranged into sections as follows: ■ Overview of Disability Inclusion Action Plans – Background information on disability reform, Action Plans and the current policy and legislative context; the importance of integrating inclusion as core business into all NSW public authorities; and the key outcome areas under which to organise disability inclusion commitments. ■ Disability Inclusion Action Plan outline – Provides a suggested outline for the plans which reflects the requirements of the Disability Inclusion Act. Given the diverse operating contexts of NSW public authorities, this outline is suggested as a guide only. ■ Step by step plan for Action Plan development and implementation – A guide to developing and implementing a high quality plan based on best practice. ■ Additional information – Glossary of acronyms; a list of useful resources; and contacts for additional support. ■ Additional resources and support – These guidelines will be updated over time in response to feedback, and as new resources, or approaches are developed. Users are encouraged to visit the FACS website for updated versions and access to tools, learning and development and monitoring and evaluation resources.

Additional support or information is available via: ■ Disability Inclusion line on 1800 782 306 ■ Email: [email protected] ■ Webpage: www.facs.nsw.gov.au/diap 3 Overview of Disability Inclusion Action Plans

3.1 The case for inclusion

Personal choice and control for all people in society is only possible in a community which ensures access and inclusion for people with disability, including physical disabilities, intellectual disabilities, cognitive disabilities, sensory disabilities, and those with mental health conditions. Without an inclusive society and the opportunities that an inclusive community provides, diversity is not promoted, control over choice is limited and positive change for people with disability may not occur. The case for an inclusive society and community is strong: ■ As a community, we are poorer without a diverse range of viewpoints and individual perspectives. ■ Exclusion leads to disadvantage and discrimination, which have far reaching negative impacts across all aspects of life, including health, welfare, education and employment. These impacts are felt beyond the individual, with family units and the broader community all being negatively impacted by a non-inclusive society. ■ There is a strong economic imperative for increasing the inclusiveness of our society. Analysis indicates that providing people with disability real job opportunities and the chance to move off social service dependence can have a large economic impact.1 Greater inclusion of people with disability in the community is also recognised as a fundamental purpose of the National Disability Strategy 2010-2020, the current ten year plan aimed at improving the lives of Australians with disability, their families and carers. Critical to achieving positive change and creating a more inclusive NSW is the provision of an overarching strategy, the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan, which provides a basis from which to build a more inclusive NSW for all people with disability. By bringing to life the vision for a fully inclusive NSW as articulated in the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan, Action Plans will enable NSW public authorities to enjoy the social and economic benefits of planning for greater inclusion. Depending on the operating context, each public authority in NSW will have a unique business case for supporting inclusion of people with disability. This rationale should be explored and documented in each Action Plan.

1 Deloitte Access Economics (2011) The Economic Benefits of Increasing Employment for People with Disability. ‘My hope is that we will be employing young graduates, coming out of their high school programs and giving them on the job training and pushing them through and influencing our supporters to provide better training programs for young people with disability…because it’s a winner.’ Case study participant

REMEMBER: Action Plans should be positioned as core business and integrated with existing planning cycles, so that employees at every level consider inclusion of people with disability in their business.

3.2 Policy and legislative context

NSW is currently undergoing a period of major reform in the disability sector. Within this context of change, NSW has demonstrated an ongoing commitment to improving inclusion for people with disability. 3.2.1 NSW Disability reforms The NSW Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (DIA) continues the government’s commitment to improving the lives of people with disability and reaffirms the state-wide focus on building a truly inclusive community, through planning and coordination across all levels of government and across portfolios. The DIA is a progressive piece of legislation reflecting the person-centred approach to disability services and inclusion while continuing to provide the legal foundation in NSW for regulating supports, services, and funding to people with disability until full transition to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). The DIA also requires the development of the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan and Action Plans which provides NSW’s ongoing commitment to people with disability beyond full roll-out of the NDIS. The dedicated NSW Disability Inclusion Plan, provides a whole of government strategy to support the objects and principles of the DIA. Specifically, the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan sets out: 1 The whole of government goals that support the inclusion in the community of people with disability and to improve access to mainstream service and community facilities by people with disability; and 2 Provides for collaboration and co-ordination among public authorities in the provision of supports and services. The DIA creates an obligation for certain public authorities to develop Action Plans. An Action Plan is a statement of commitment by NSW public authorities to inclusion and to the vision of the NSW Inclusion Plan while also functioning as a practical plan, setting out how the authority will realise this vision. As outlined in figure 1, the four themes of the Disability Inclusion Plan are carried across to the Action Plans. This emphasises the whole of government commitment to progress these areas. It is recognised that each public authority in NSW operates with legislative and policy obligations beyond these four areas, such as federal standards in transport, education and health. All Action Plans should be planned, developed and implemented in consideration of the unique legislative and policy responsibilities of each agency.

‘As a wheelchair user, this is one venue (Acer Arena), I never hesitate to book tickets at. It means I can sit with my friends and not by myself.’ Case study participant

3.2.2 Overarching policy and legislation United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) The UNCRPD, ratified by Australia in 2008, acknowledges that people with disability have the same human rights as those without disability. This commits participating governments to ensure these rights can be exercised and that barriers are removed. Importantly, implementing a rights-based approach under the UNCRPD does not limit governments to addressing the provision of specialist services to people with disability – it requires mainstream services to be provided in a way that does not directly or indirectly prevent people with disability fully participating. This focus on mainstream service access means that all levels of government, as well as other parts of the community, have a role to play in giving effect to the UNCRPD. National Disability Strategy 2010-2020 (NDS) The NDS 2010-2020, developed in partnership by the Commonwealth, state and territory and local governments, sets out a national plan for improving life for Australians with disability, their families and carers, to support the commitment made to the UNCRPD. The NDS is designed to guide public policy across Australia and specifically aims to bring about change in all mainstream services and programs. The NDS sets out six priority areas which reflect the broad scope of the UNCRPD, for action to improve the lives of people with disability, their families and carers. The NDS NSW Implementation Plan 2012-2014 was the NSW Government’s initial two-year strategy to promote the principles of the NDS. These principles have now been aligned with the objects of the Disability Inclusion Act (2014) and Disability Inclusion Plan. The NSW Government continues to work with the Commonwealth to progress actions and report on progress particularly through the COAG and the Disability Minister’s forum.

3.2.3 Other relevant legislation In addition to the UNCRPD and the NDS, there are additional pieces of legislation that provide a framework and basis for disability inclusion action planning. Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 1993 (DDA) The Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 1993 (DDA) recognises the rights of people with disability to equality before the law and makes discrimination based on disability unlawful. The DDA covers many areas of life including employment, education, access to premises and provision of goods, services and facilities. DDA sections 60 and 61 set out the provisions for the completion of Action Plans that fulfill the intent of the DDA and sets measurable and accountable goals. Public authorities may wish to draft their Action Plans under the DIA in such a way as to comply with both the DIA and the DDA. NSW Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (ADA) The NSW Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (ADA) relates to discrimination in places of work, the public education system, delivery and goods and services including services such as banking, health care, property and night clubs. NSW Government Sector Employment Act 2013 The Government Sector Employment Act 2013 (GSE Act) and the associated Regulation and Rules provide a new statutory framework focused on NSW government sector employment and workforce management. The GSE Act repealed the requirement for Equal Employment Opportunity Management Plans under the ADA. Instead strategies for workplace diversity are now required to be integrated with workforce planning across the government sector. Integrating diversity requirements into workforce planning represents a shift in the way diversity is addressed in public sector employment. More information is available is on the Public Service Commission website.

REMEMBER: Public authorities are responsible for ensuring they meet the legislative and compliance obligations of all relevant legislation – these requirements will vary depending on the activities of each agency.

Additional Resources - Legislation The following legislation may assist when developing Disability Action Plans. NSW NSW Disability Inclusion Act 2014 NSW Government Sector Employment Act 2013 NSW Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 NSW Legislation can be found at: www.legislation.nsw.gov.au

Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Commonwealth legislation can be found at: www.comlaw.gov.au

Useful disability policy links include: NSW Disability Inclusion Plan www.facs.nsw.gov.au/dip NSW Disability Action Planning www.facs.nsw.gov.au/diap National Disability Strategy National Disability Insurance Scheme

Figure 1

Figure 2 – The relationships between the relevant policy and legislative instruments

3.2.4 The role for Disability Inclusion Action Plans Action Plans will play an important role in fully including people with disability in our society. They will: ■ provide a public statement of the commitment to accessibility and inclusion among public authorities promoting equal rights for all ■ communicate the vision for inclusion across public authorities, for staff, stakeholders and the broader community ■ put the principles outlined in the DIA and the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan into practice across public authorities ■ outline specific actions to facilitate access to mainstream services for people with disability, potentially with some level of adaptation or adjustment ■ be a vehicle to engage with the internal and external disability community to bring to life real solutions for better inclusion ■ include assessment and monitoring of actions within each plan

The complex structure and functions of some NSW public authorities may require them to individually assess their responsibilities under the DIA and other laws and decide whether to develop a department level Action Plan, or multiple agency level Action Plans for each agency or division. It is envisaged that some NSW government departments may develop an overarching plan with sections that relate specifically to unique areas of business and/or service delivery within their cluster. Regardless of the number of Action Plans to develop and implement and at what levels, disability inclusion action planning should be integrated as part of broader corporate and budget planning processes.

3.3 Key outcome areas

The disability action planning areas of focus provide a suggested structure for a disability Action Plan and examples of relevant actions for each area. 3.3.1 Attitudes and behaviours The attitudes and behaviours of the general community towards people with disability have been described as the single greatest barrier to full access and inclusion. Attitudes and behaviour permeate all aspects of life. Consultation to date has identified that attitudes towards people with disability are often determined by ignorance, fear or lack of opportunity to interact. Developing positive attitudes involves increasing awareness and changing negative perceptions over time. This is a long term goal that may need to be dealt with in stages. Examples of actions might include: ■ integrate training on disability access and inclusion into all staff induction/orientation practices ■ develop specific training for front line and service delivery staff to demonstrate competency in inclusive practice and service provision ■ review and adjust funding agreements and contracts to specify delivery of accessible and inclusive services and programs by third parties or contractors ■ develop messages and campaigns that highlight the case for disability inclusion ■ involve people with a disability in the development of communication campaigns regarding disability inclusion

Practice examples – attitudes and behaviour

The NSW Department of Justice has introduced a program of flexible service delivery training for policy and operational staff across the agency. Training recognises the specific support needs of people with disability who may come into contact with the justice system to ensure they are considered.

The City of Sydney provides a specific program dedicated to training all staff involved in community consultation to consider the necessary requirements for an inclusive community.

3.3.2 Liveable communities Creating liveable communities will focus attention and resources on the elements of community life that most people desire. Creating liveable communities for people with disability is more than modifying the physical environment, it covers areas such as accessible housing, access to transport, community recreation, social engagement and universal design. Examples of actions might include: ■ providing accessible toilets in all public buildings ■ providing change tables (including adult change tables) in appropriate locations ■ applying the principles of universal design in the planning of new infrastructure and buildings ■ ensuring community events are accessible and venues, transport, toilets and parking are considered in the planning ■ engaging people with disability in the design and planning phases of new major infrastructure and buildings ■ conducting audits of buildings owned or leased by the authority to assess compliance with Australian standards for access and mobility (AS1428 parts 1 to 5)

Practice examples – liveable communities

Transport for NSW includes specifications for accessibility, in line with the Transport Standards in the design phase for all future purchases or provision of public transport infrastructure such as busses, trains and ferries.

The Department of Family and Community Services partnered with the National Public Toilet Map Project and Spinal Cord Injuries Australia to improve the breadth and quality of information on accessible public toilets in NSW.

3.3.3 Employment The Government Sector Employment Act 2013 (GSE Act) requires the integration of workforce diversity, including the employment of people with disability, into workforce planning. In particular, section 63 of the GSE Act provides that the head of a government sector agency is responsible for workforce diversity within the agency and for ensuring that workforce diversity is integrated into workforce planning in the agency. This legislation supports workforce diversity obligations and processes across the government sector. Employment and economic security for most people are closely related. Employment contributes to feelings of self-worth, social interaction and mental health, and increases opportunities to support individual choice and control. Employment rates for people with disability are significantly lower than those without disability across all sectors. People with disability experience multiple barriers at all stages of the employment process, ranging from inaccessible interview venues, lack of reasonable adjustments to the work environment, poor career planning opportunities, rigid role descriptions and online testing that may place applicants at a disadvantage. These factors reduce their opportunities to gain and retain employment. There is also good evidence to show that organisational commitment to workforce diversity and inclusion is closely linked to strong business performance. Recent research by Deloitte and the Victorian Equal Employment Opportunity and Australian Human Rights Commission found evidence of a performance ‘uplift of 80% when both conditions [commitment to diversity and to inclusion] were high’2. The research report goes on to say

2 Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission and Deloitte., Waiter, is that inclusion in my soup?, Research Report, 2012

that when employees think their organisation is committed to, and supportive of diversity and they feel included, they ‘…report better business performance in terms of ability to innovate (83% uplift), responsiveness to changing customer needs (31% uplift) and team collaboration (42% uplift)’. The research highlights the importance of understanding that inclusion at work is about more than fairness and respect - it is also about being valued and a sense of belonging. While there are many aspects to consider in executing a diversity and inclusion employment agenda, most benefit will come from taking an ‘inclusion by design’ approach. That is, employers and managers will maximise their ability to employ and retain a diverse workforce if they build inclusion into work design, workforce strategy and system-level decision making (as opposed to simply making reasonable adjustments to accommodate persons with disability on a case-by-case basis). For example: ■ Design all work as flexibly as possible, with a focus on achieving the desired outcomes rather than starting from required work methods, location, hours and so on; ■ Actively develop respectful and welcoming work cultures; ■ Make diversity and inclusion a key consideration for strategic workforce planning; ■ Develop specific attraction and retention strategies; ■ Design role specifications and advertisements to avoid knowledge or capability requirements that are not essential for satisfactory performance in the role; ■ Design recruitment assessment methods to optimize the opportunities given to all applicants to demonstrate their merits against the job requirements; ■ Incorporate strategies and plans into learning and development opportunities as well as career planning; ■ Promote flexibility and accountability for all staff in the way that they work; ■ Make equity and access key criteria for decisions about physical infrastructure, and information and communications technology; ■ Keep inclusion front-of-mind when designing workforce management processes and practices; and ■ Commit to regularly review the efficacy of the approach at systems and individual level in order to refine and improve. In designing inclusive workforce strategies, agencies should draw on relevant data to ensure that workforce planning is evidence-based. Data sources may include internal agency records, databases and surveys; Workforce Information Profiles; and the results of the annual People Matter Employee Survey. These data sets can assist agencies to understand their current position, challenges and opportunities. E.g. agencies may wish to consider information about the level, type and distribution of employment of people with a disability within their agency at present and over time; turnover and recruitment rates, and so on. With this information they can plan more effectively. Authorities should also develop a strategy to encourage all staff to provide their diversity data so that the organisation’s ‘picture’ is as accurate as possible. Actions to improve engagement and support for people with disability in public sector workplaces will include enhancing employee networks such as the Disability Employee Network outlined in the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan. Guidance on specific actions that support employment for people with disability will be developed in further supporting material to these guidelines.

REMEMBER: Many people with disability do not wish to identify as having a disability when applying for a job as they fear a negative consequence. People with disability are more likely to respond to job advertisements that actively demonstrate a culture that is inclusive and disability conscious. It will be hard to progress until we can create an environment where people are comfortable identifying as having a disability.

Practice examples - employment

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia developed a bi-annual Diversity Support Mentoring Program for job seekers with disability, pairing university students with disability with mentors within the bank to gain exposure to the workforce.

The NSW Department of Trade and Investment undertook an applicant perspective recruitment process review with Australian Network on Disability to identify any unintended barriers in the mainstream recruitment processes.

3.3.4 Systems and processes A common issue for people with disability is the difficulty in navigating systems and processes to access the services and supports they need in the community. Some of these difficulties stem from the quality of service and training of front line personnel, the systems and processes required to access services, and the lack of accessible options for communicating, accessing information or providing input or feedback. There is often confusion about what services are provided across the three levels of government, and there is frequent repetition of information to be provided to public authorities and services. Examples of actions to support improvements in this area might include: ■ ensuring all service information is available in accessible electronic formats ■ ensuring service users have access to communications supports such as hearing augmentation, touch screens and translation services ■ mandating all feedback and complaint mechanisms to be fully accessible ■ requiring web content compliance with at least conformance level AA in the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines ■ providing a mechanism for feedback on access and inclusion in NSW ■ ensuring internal systems and processes are accessible to staff with disability

Practice examples – systems and processes

The NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet are leading the introduction of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 to improve access to all NSW Government websites. This will make it easier for those interacting with the government to find the information they need.

ANZ Bank has embedded inclusion thinking into their product design, review, approval and communications processes. These processes have been reviewed to ensure they consider accessibility criteria and standards.

REMEMBER: there is no one checklist of actions that lists good practice or required actions, as one size fits all approaches are not appropriate. Priorities should be determined through consultation and planning to target barriers to access experienced by agency’s clients, students, patients, workforce, customers or communities. 4 Disability Inclusion Action Plan outline

The following outline provides a suggested structure for Action Plans. Organisations may wish to incorporate additional information in their Action Plans to address specific legislation, standards or policy.

Introduction from minister/secretary/mayor Each public authority should provide a statement of vision and commitment to the principles of the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan, the UNCRPD and the National Disability Strategy, emphasising the importance of inclusion of people with disability based on ethical and economic imperatives. The unique case for inclusion should be identified by each public authority, and a commitment affirmed to making inclusion core business.

Guiding Principles The Guiding Principles outline the specific approach to inclusion given a unique operating environment, customer and staff profile. As a guide, public authorities should outline between 3-10 Guiding Principles.

Policy and legislative context Authorities should reference the UNCRPD, the National Disability Strategy, the DIA, DDA, ADA and the GSE, AND other legislation or regulations applying to the specific agency for example federal standards.

Our customers and staff Each public authority should establish a profile of the range and scale of disability among their service users, potential service users and staff. This profile can be used to articulate the argument for improving interaction/inclusion and provide direction on potential priority areas and population groups.

Consultation governance and resources Each Action Plan should describe: ■ the process undertaken to develop the plan including consultation, participants, research and planning ■ the governance and accountability arrangements ■ resources and the process for developing actions Key outcome areas and actions The four focus areas of the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan provide a proposed structure under which to group actions. Additional outcome areas may be required to reflect the operating context within each department/agency. Each action should be as detailed as possible, at a minimum including: ■ outcome area ■ action title and description ■ aim and expected outcome ■ target population or audience ■ timeframe for action to be commenced/achieved ■ individual or area responsible ■ resources ■ specific and measurable indicators to assess performance ■ reporting requirements

Monitoring, reviewing and reporting Outline an evaluation framework and detailed plan to monitor, measure and review results to track and report on Action Plan.

5 Step by step plan for Action Plan development & implementation

The following is a step-by-step approach to assist public authorities plan the Action Plan development and implementation process. Each public authority drafting an Action Plan will need to consider their specific operating context, existing planning cycles and objectives and adjust this approach for development and implementation accordingly.

5.1 Allocate executive ownership and responsibility

Before allocating specific responsibilities in development and implementation, at least one executive level sponsor within the department should be identified. The sponsor(s) will champion the importance of inclusion planning for people with disability throughout the organisation, assume overall accountability for resourcing and planning decisions, and commit to driving the inclusion action planning process.

REMEMBER: The Disability Inclusion Action Plan must be sponsored and championed at the executive level to position inclusion planning as a high priority.

Following the appointment of an executive level sponsor, a lead officer or project manager to chair the Disability Inclusion Action Planning working group and lead the development and implementation should be identified. This internal working group should have representation from operational and service areas of the authority including customer services/front-line staff. The Action Plan development and implementation requires a range of skills across community consultation, strategic and operational planning, measurement, communications development and organisational change, therefore the ideal working group should be a multi-disciplinary team. Consider bringing in outside experts to the working group such as people with disability or representatives of disability organisations (the Disability Council NSW for example), taking care to achieve an appropriate representation across the range of disability.

REMEMBER: Resources must be allocated for Disability Inclusion Action Plan development and implementation as part of budget planning.

5.2 Map your functions, facilities, services and information sources

To develop effective Action Plans, working groups will ideally need a clear picture of the overall operating environment in which improved inclusion may be possible. Each member of the internal working group should invest time into preparing a list of their service areas’ operations, including programs, facilities, public information sources, services including contracted operations and an organisational structure including all internal roles and contractors. In addition, typical service user pathways should be identified. The term ‘service users’ has been used throughout this document as a collective term for NSW public sector users that may include customers, patients, students, people in contact with the justice system and other service user types. Once each service area is identified and areas for improved inclusion are documented, the working group should come together to: ■ identify opportunities for improved inclusion ■ identify additional areas through consultation with staff with disability, the disability sector and members of the disability community ■ identify actions, resources, strategies and approaches to improve inclusion he disability sector and members

REMEMBER: Including case studies and examples throughout can be effective ways to highlight achievements of inclusion planning.

5.3 Determine governance and accountability arrangements

Governance structures exist to provide clear and transparent lines of accountability. A strong relationship exists between good governance and good government performance. In order for Action Plans to be successfully implemented and drive real and lasting change, governance and accountability arrangements must be established early and clearly communicated. This may be achieved through the incorporation of indicators tied to positive inclusion outcomes for senior management. It may also involve allocating specific ongoing responsibility for monitoring and evaluating implementation of the plan. In some cases public authorities may choose to link performance indicators directly to disability inclusion outcomes. REMEMBER: Governance and accountability structures should link disability inclusion planning, implementation and reporting directly to the executive level of public authorities.

5.4 Consultation and co-design with customers, staff and the community

An essential element in preparing an Action Plan is community consultation and engagement. This ensures the plan is focused on the needs of staff and customers and service users. When done well, consultation should give respect to the lived experience of people with disability, empower people to influence the direction of their lives and encourage full participation to enable the identification of barriers and propose solutions. Section 12 of the DIA mandates this consultation. Consultation and engagement takes time and skill to do well. Consultation with communities and staff with disability is essential in the development of Action Plans and while this adds a layer of complexity if considered carefully and included in the early planning stages it adds great value to the process.

REMEMBER: Section 12 of the Disability Inclusion Act 2014 mandates that disability inclusion planning should be done in consultation with people with disability.

Consultation should be approached as a process of co-design and collaboration with staff and communities, rather than an information briefing. For consultation and engagement to be truly collaborative, it must commence at the beginning of the development process, with multiple opportunities for involvement and a commitment to informing all participants of the progress and outcomes of each consultation occasion. The International Association for Public Participation has developed the ‘Spectrum of Participation’ described in figure 3 below which relates to different forms of stakeholder participation. The five levels of engagement within the Public Participation Spectrum are summarised in the diagram below. Stakeholder participation in the development of the Action Plan should be approached in the spirit of involvement, partnership and collaboration, to ensure hopes and concerns among the community are reflected in plan’s commitments.

Figure 3 The spectrum of engagement and participation in consultation

5.4.1 Plan the consultation Working groups should develop a detailed consultation plan, for both internal and external consultation. Well thought out planning will maximise participation. When conducting any consultation, the following checklist for good practice should be considered: ■ Always make the purpose of consultation clear; ■ Acknowledge the scope for influence, and the limitations associated with each consultation; ■ Remember the rights of people with disability to be involved in decision making that affects their lives, as well as their right to not participate; ■ Ensure all information such as documents, invitations, directions, forms etc. are in accessible formats including websites, community languages, participation, ration, to ensure hopes and concerns among en promoting consultations; ■ Provide adequate time, both in terms of notifying stakeholders of engagement opportunities and time allowed to access, review and respond to materials; ■ Be mindful that people with disability may require a longer lead time in which to organise transportation to the consultation; ■ Bear in mind the cost of involvement to participants and consider reimbursing costs associated with participation such as transport costs, reply paid envelopes and paying sitting fees for regular contributors; ■ Consider the value of convening joint consultations with other NSW public authorities; ■ Ensure participants are informed at consultations how their information will be used and report back to participants regarding the results and next steps of engagement; and ■ It may not always be possible to canvas the views of all disability groups, especially in smaller communities.

Public authorities should consider the needs of all disability groups, irrespective of whether they are able to participate in the consultations. Alternative consultation methods are outlined in the section below. The consultation strategy should be signed off by the executive level sponsor, to ensure support and encourage participation across all levels of the organisation. 5.4.2 Select appropriate consultation methods The appropriate consultation methods will vary across NSW public authorities, depending on size, location, nature of services and service users and the purpose of the consultation. Some options to consider include: ■ large public meetings/community forums ■ small group discussions/meetings ■ interviews, either face to face or over the phone ■ surveys, either online, via telephone or paper based ■ written submissions, either online or paper based ■ convening a steering group ■ guest attendance at groups that meet regularly

For consultation opportunities aimed at maximising responses, a range of methods should be used to encourage participation including: ■ newspaper, broadcast and online advertisements ■ use of internal communications ■ direct invitations

REMEMBER: Community consultation must be undertaken in the spirit of collaboration rather than an information briefing. Involve staff and the disability community early in the development of the Action Plan, taking steps to maximise participation at multiple consultation opportunities.

5.4.3 Decide who to engage Working groups should determine those best placed to participate, with a focus on internal audiences, external stakeholders, service users and potential service users. Internal audiences might include: ■ front line/customer service staff ■ staff whose role relates to access and inclusion ■ managers ■ members of the disability access or advisory committee ■ staff with disability

External stakeholders might include: ■ people with disability and their carers/families ■ disability service providers ■ disability peak bodies/advocacy organisations, taking care to represent the diversity of disability type

Service users should include both current and potential service users. The true value of consultation around barriers is the opportunity to talk to ‘consumers’ who are not currently accessing services but should be. 5.4.4 Ensure full accessibility It is vital to remember the many barriers to participation in consultation. Individuals with disability may be excluded from participation if accessible formats or interpreters are not available. A range of other economic, social and cultural barriers should also be considered.

REMEMBER: Seek additional advice on engagement with people with disability if required. FACS Disability Access and Inclusion and the Disability Council NSW can direct agencies to resources and contacts within key organisations.

Additional support or information is available via: ■ Disability Inclusion line on 1800 782 306 ■ Email: [email protected] ■ Webpage: www.facs.nsw.gov.au/diap

Additional Resources - Consultation The Australian Government has produced a guide to inclusive consultation for people with disability, Inclusive Consultation: A practical guide to involving people with disabilities. Meetings and Events Australia has produced a guide to organising accessible events, Accessible Events: A guide for meeting and event organisers. The International Association for Public Participation provides several resources regarding public participation at the Resources section of their website. Privacy NSW has produced advice regarding privacy and people with decision making disabilities, Best practice guide: Privacy and people with decision making disabilities. The New South Wales Council of Social Services has produced a research report on improving public participation in NSW, Have your say – but how? Urbis has prepared an accessible consultations guide, Accessibility considerations in hosting consultations see www.urbis.com.au/accessible- consultations The Victorian Department of Human Services has produced a guide for inclusive consultation and communication with people with disability on their website.

5.4.5 Report on the consultation The DIA mandates that Disability Inclusion Action Plans should provide a summary of the consultation process undertaken in developing the plan and should outline: ■ audiences/organisations involved in the consultation ■ the methods utilised in the consultation process ■ brief description of the timeline, from start to finish ■ a summary of the influence the consultation had on the content and structure of the Action Plan ■ plans for ongoing consultation 5.5 Undertake disability inclusion action planning

For disability inclusion action planning to be embedded as core business in NSW public authorities, it is critically important that action planning is integrated with existing planning cycles and processes to align the process with existing strategic priorities and achieve efficiencies where possible. Specific actions, to be organised under the four key outcome areas (incorporating additional outcome areas if required), are to be determined based on the consultation process, the map of public authority functions, attention to whole of government actions and in consideration of the agency specific priorities and strategic plans. For each action, the Disability Inclusion Action Plan must indicate the: ■ outcome area ■ action title and description ■ aim and expected outcome ■ target population or audience ■ timeframe for action to be commenced/achieved ■ individual/or area responsible ■ resources ■ specific and measurable indicators to assess performance ■ reporting requirements

REMEMBER: Action Plans should include specific and measurable indicators of success for every action, avoiding the use of ambiguous timeframes, targets, indicators and responsibilities. A measurement and evaluation strategy is to be developed to ensure there is an evidence base for progress.

5.6 Develop risk mitigation strategy Integral to strategic planning processes is a risk mitigation strategy – to identify risks in implementation and draft strategies to overcome these risks before they materialise. Risks in implementation should be documented and strategies to mitigate determined. Staff and communities involved in the development of the Action Plan should be informed of the risk mitigation strategy, and asked to provide input before finalising. The risk mitigation strategy should be overseen by the Disability Inclusion Action Plan lead officer or executive level sponsor, rather than the working group to promote a more objective appraisal of risks. 5.7 Prepare a monitoring and reporting strategy

To enable reporting on the success of implementation of Action Plans, a monitoring and reporting strategy outlining the specific and measurable actions must be developed, communicated, implemented and its progress tracked. Regular monitoring of the Action Plan will enable public authorities to: ■ amend their Action Plan to reflect achievements, and adapt and respond to new inclusion challenges ■ redirect attention and resources to areas where changes prove difficult to achieve ■ provide accurate and timely reporting ■ meet their obligations under the DIA including how the Action Plan supports the goals of the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan

The working group should prepare the monitoring and reporting strategy at the time of drafting the Action Plan. Monitoring and evaluation must be considered during the planning process, to ensure actions are specific and measureable and appropriate data is collected. See the Appendix for a suggested reporting structure. In preparing the monitoring and evaluation strategy, working groups should: ■ design a measurement and evaluation framework for the Action Plan, including identifying indicators for every action ■ identify all data sources required to regularly report the progress against each action including developing strategies for additional data collection as required ■ determine the frequency, format and responsibility for reporting on the indicators against each action in the plan and the arrangements for collating this data ■ seek executive level approval and sign-off on the monitoring and evaluation strategy, to encourage support and commitment across the department

Section 12 of the DIA stipulates that public authorities in NSW include reporting on the implementation of their Action Plan in their Annual Reports, and as soon as is practicable forward a copy of the report to the minister. These will be tabled in a report to parliament regarding disability inclusion action planning and implementation annually.

REMEMBER: Ongoing engagement with those who are impacted by or benefit from actions in the Action Plan provides a valuable source of data and mechanism by which to judge efficacy. 5.8 Plan for continual engagement

The DIA requires public authorities to review their Disability Inclusion Action Plan every four years. The review of Action Plans should be approached in the spirit of continuous improvement.

REMEMBER: The Disability Inclusion Action Plan is a dynamic document regularly reviewed and improved, not a standalone document that is developed and shelved.

It is recommended at minimum, quarterly meetings of the working group are conducted to monitor progress, as well as a bi-annual internal review to adjust actions as required, and an annual review including elements of staff and community consultation to reassess actions and risk mitigation. A suggested work plan for continual engagement is listed below. Embedding inclusion planning within the culture of the NSW Government through continual engagement is important. To begin achieving this significant cultural shift towards disability inclusion, the working group and other public authority staff and stakeholders should revisit the Action Plan and monitor progress as a standing item on management agendas.

REMEMBER: Disability awareness is at the core of the Disability Inclusion Action Plan. Training, particularly for frontline service delivery staff, regarding the importance of, and practical steps toward disability inclusion is crucial.

5.9 Publish your Action Plan

The DIA mandates that Disability Inclusion Action Plans prepared by public authorities in NSW must be readily available to the public. Action Plans should be easily accessed on websites that are W3C compliant (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines conformance level AA). This will allow assistive technology users to easily navigate and access information available on websites in formats pursuant to the W3C guidelines which include, Rich Text Format (RTF), Text and Word versions. NSW public authorities must take steps to ensure their Action Plans are accessible and publish the option to obtain accessible formats. For example, using a minimum font size 12 in high contrast with the background and providing alternative formats such as audio, large print and easy English. A system should be in place so requests can be responded to. Additionally, the DIA mandates that a public authority must give a copy to the Disability Council NSW and provide a report on the implementation of the Action Plan in their Annual Report. Whilst not mandatory, entities are encouraged to lodge their plans with the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) as they list and provide links to all plans it registers on its website.

5.10 Promote the Action Plan to staff and the community

Action Plans should be distributed internally within public authorities and an investment should be made into raising awareness of the Action Plan (or key actions within the plans) in a range of ways to be tailored by organisations. These methods might include: ■ poster campaigns ■ newsletters ■ awards recognising individuals involved in achieving disability inclusion targets ■ integration of the Action Plan in induction processes

REMEMBER: Use plain intentional English and design the Disability Inclusion Action Plan to be visually engaging and usable.

Action Plans should also be promoted in a range of ways externally, including using the website, existing external communications and the media as appropriate. NSW public authorities may also want to consider having the Action Plan available in summary format, limited to a few pages, for distribution to wider audiences. Summary documents should be in easy English and in accessible formats. Regular updating of progress on the Action Plan’s implementation is as important as its initial launch. Integrating disability inclusion into the core business of all public authorities in NSW is at the heart of disability inclusion planning. Some suggestions for regular updates on progress include: ■ development of a dashboard, to report on high level progress against actions and key outcome areas ■ case studies in print or through internal media, to communicate the impact the Action Plan is having on staff and service users ■ including a standing item within internal communications regarding Action Plans progress

5.11 Evaluation

Disability Inclusion Action Plans are the mechanism to deliver on the intent and objectives of the DIA. To this end, FACS will develop a whole-of- government evaluation framework for reporting on the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan and Disability Inclusion Action Plans. Resources will be made available online.

REMEMBER: Under the DIA public authorities must include a report on the progress of their Disability Inclusion Action Plan in their Annual Report. An explanation of how the plan supports the goals of the NSW Disability Inclusion Plan and a summary of the consultation process undertaken in developing the plan must be provided. A copy of the Disability Inclusion Action Plan must be given to the Disability Council NSW and be publicly available.

5.12 Initial support

To support the development of disability inclusion action planning FACS will: ■ conduct a range of whole of government planning workshops for staff involved in the development of Disability Inclusion Planning to support their processes ■ develop resources to support the planning and implementation of the DIAP guidelines ■ work with Planning NSW through the Office of Local Government and Local Government NSW to ensure that there is an alignment of the disability inclusion action planning and reporting process with the integrated planning and reporting processes for local government ■ engage NSW disability peaks and other organisations and individuals, and invite their participation in the development of resources to support the process and their participation in working groups and other activities

Additional support or information is available via: ■ Disability Inclusion line on 1800 782 306 ■ Email: [email protected] ■ Webpage: www.facs.nsw.gov.au/diap

6 Additional resources

6.1 Links and resources

Evidence base for disability inclusion ■ Australian Bureau of Statistics collections on disability data are available here. ■ The NSW Public Service Commission has released a report detailing the employment situation of people with disability in the NSW public sector, Disabling the Barriers. ■ The Australian Human Rights Commission overview of the history and aims of the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 1992. A series of publications are available here.

Physical access Standards Australia has written the following standards for disability access to buildings: ■ AS 1428.1-2009 Design for access and mobility - General requirements for access to buildings ■ AS 1428.2-1992 Design for access and mobility - Enhanced and additional requirements - Buildings and facilities ■ AS 1428.3-1992 Design for access and mobility - Requirements for children and adolescents with physical disabilities ■ AS/NZS 1428.4.1:2009 Design for access and mobility - Means to assist the orientation of people with vision impairment - Tactile ground surface indicators ■ AS 1428.5-2010 Design for access and mobility - Communication for people who are deaf or hearing impaired The Australian Human Rights Commission provides a range of resources on disability and access issues, including information about access to premises and other resources website. Vision Australia has developed a set of guidelines to improve access to public buildings by people with vision impairment which can be accessed here. The Australian Network on Disability website has information about evacuation procedures for people with disability which can be accessed here.

Accessibility The W3C Guidelines for website design are available here. The Australian Human Rights Commission also provides guidelines on accessible websites. Vision Australia has produced a guide to adaptive technologies for people with vision impairment, which can be accessed here.

Language People with Disability Australia guide to language relating to disability which can be accessed here.

Employment The Australian Public Service Commission has produced a guide to including people with disability in the workplace: Ability at Work, tapping the talent of people with disability. The NSW Department of Family and Community Services publishes information about employing people with disability which can be accessed here. JobAccess supports the employment of people with disability by providing information and advice for people with disability and their employers, which can be accessed here. Disability Employment Australia has collated resources about how to ensure that a workplace is an inclusive and supportive environment for people with disability, which can be accessed here.

6.2 Suggested reporting template

Action title Description Timeframe Target Performance Comment

LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES

EMPLOYMENT

COMMUNITY ATITTUDES AND BEHAVIOURS

SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES

OTHER

Additional templates and resources will be produced to assist public authorities to develop, and report on their inclusion plans.

7 References

AHRC - Annual Report 2009-2010: Complaint Statistics. (2010). Retrieved June 12, 2014, from Australian Human Rights Commission: www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/complaint-statistics-annual-report- 2009-2010-australian-human-rights-commission-0 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012). 4430.0 - Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Network on Disability (2014). Business Benefits. Sydney, NSW, Australia. Deloitte Access Economics. (2011). The Economic Benefits of Increasing Employment for People with Disability. International Association of Public Participation. (n.d.) Public Participation Spectrum. Wollongong, NSW, Australia. OECD. (2010). Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. Paris: OECD. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2011). Disability expectations: investing in a better life, a stronger Australia. Sydney: PricewaterhouseCoopers. World Bank. (2013, August 15). Social Accountability and the Demand for Good Governance.

8 Abbreviations

ACTION PLANS – Disability Inclusion Action Plans ADA – Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) AND – Australian Network on Disability DAP – Disability Action Plan DDA – Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Commonwealth) DIA – Disability Inclusion Act 2014 (NSW) DSA – Disability Services Act 1993 (NSW) FACS – Department of Family and Community Services GSE – Government Sector Employment Act 2013 (NSW) KPI – Key performance indicator ICT – Information and communications technology NDIS – National Disability Insurance Scheme NDS – National Disability Strategy 2010-2020 NIIC – NSW Interdepartmental Implementation Committee SDAC – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers UNCRPD – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE FROM COUNCILLOR M HOLMES

Referred to Council’s Meeting of 17 November 2015

Question

Item 5[ADCCS] Eurongilly District Hall Committee – request for assistance with rates – 20 October 2015 Ordinary Council Meeting. The third paragraph states that “…the Council has assisted the Eurongilly District Hall Committee in past years by donating the amount of rates to them.”

My questions are:

1. How many times have Council assisted the Three times. Eurongilly District Hall Committee in the past 12 years?

2. How much financial assistance with rates in • 2011 - $ 289.75 dollar amounts has the Eurongilly District • 2013 - $ 300.21 Hall Committee received in those 12 years? • 2015 - $ 1077.80 • Total: $1667.76

3. What were the ordinary meeting of Junee • 20 September 2011 Shire Council dates that the requests for • 21 May 2013 assistance were presented in those 12 • 20 October 2015 years?

J:\Council Meetings\2015\2015 NOVEMBER 17 ORDINARY MEETING\Questions on Notice - Cr Holmes-November 2015.doc Page 1

JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

INFORMATION BOOKLET

JUNEE SHIRE COUNCIL

INFORMATION BOOKLET

ORDINARY MEETING TUESDAY, 17 NOVEMBER 2015

1[GM] COUNCILLOR DELEGATE MEETINGS

2[WSRM] WORKERS’ COMPENSATION/REHABILITATION

3[LOIC] LIBRARY

4[DES] WORKS PROGRAM

5[DES] SEWERAGE SYSTEM

6[DDES] SOLID WASTE REPORT

7[EO] NOXIOUS WEEDS

8[DDES] S.149 CERTIFICATES

9[DDES] DEVELOPMENT/COMPLYING DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATIONS

10[DDES] HEALTH, BUILDING, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTIONS

11[DCS] COMMUNITY TRANSPORT

12[BSO] COMMUNITY AND RECREATION

13[FA] CUSTOMER SERVICE REQUESTS SUMMARY

*******

Page 1 of 11 1[GM] COUNCILLOR DELEGATE MEETINGS

Notification of Council Committee meetings or community meetings for which Councillors may be attending.

Council Committee/Delegates Meetings

Council Delegate/Attendee Meeting Date Cr N Smith Athenium Committee 23 November 2015 Crs, Callow, Cummins & Smith Broadway Museum 23 November 2015 Cr L Cummins REROC Board Meeting 8 December 2015 Cr C Randall RENWA Noxious Weeds 8 December 2015

Community Organisation Meetings

Council Delegate/Attendee Meeting Date Councillors Old Junee Progress Association 2 December 2015 Councillors Bethungra On The Up Committee 2 December 2015

2[WSRM] WORKERS’ COMPENSATION/REHABILITATION

There were no new claims for the month of October 2015.

3[LOIC] LIBRARY

With so many people commenting on the decorated boots in the library for the Kangaroo March it was repeated as the featured event for this month. Sadly the boots were packed up at the end of the month and collected by OJ Rushton who will be exhibiting them in Sydney for the Remembrance Day celebrations.

Internet Help for Adults is a new ongoing project initiated this month. At 11am each Wednesday for up to an hour, members of the community are being offered free internet assistance to help them with their information and communication technology needs. The aim of the project is to channel customers into using one timeslot instead of unmanageable random requests for support being levelled at staff; particularly when they are working solo.

Story-time & school presentations performed in October 2015

Date Group Presenter 6.10.2015 Tuesday Story-time Kim Richards 8.10.2015 Good Start Early Learning Kim Richards 13.10.2015 Tuesday Story-time Kim Richards 15.10.2015 Good Start Early Learning Kim Richards 20.10.2015 Tuesday Story-time Kim Richards 27.10.2015 Good Start Early Learning Margaret Kanaley 29.10.2015 Good Start Early Learning Kim Richards

Meetings, training and other activities: • Margaret Kanaley attended training in Wagga (13 Oct 2015) • Kim Richards attended South West Zone Meeting in Wagga (22 Oct 2015) • Conference room use - Bethungra Dam discussion (7.10.2015) Page 2 of 11 Upcoming Business

November December Activity 3, 10, 17 & 24 1 & 8 Story-time at 10:00am 5, 12, 19 & 26 3 & 10 Good Start Learning at 10:00am 1 Food for fines starts

4[DES] WORKS PROGRAM

State Road 78 Olympic Highway

The annual heavy patch program is underway on the Wagga Road. These patches are the ones that will be in the 2016 reseals.

The flowcon truck has been along the highway fixing up depressions and potholes.

State Road 57 Goldfields Way

Only seal patching and guidepost maintenance has happened on this road.

Rural Sealed Roads

Section 3 of the Combaning Road upgrade has now received all the gravel on it and is trimmed for sealing at the end of this month. Earth filling is being carted onto the batters to ease the slope.

Byrnes Road has had extensive heavy patching completed through the hilly section. These have now all been trimmed and sealed.

Work on the Wantabadgery rehabilitation is slowly progressing. Fill is being carted onto the batters and a side track has been established around the culvert that is to be renewed. Work is now in progress demolishing the old concrete culvert structure.

Slashing of rural shoulders is in progress with Harefield, Yathella, Old Junee and Junee Reefs areas already completed.

Rural Unsealed Roads

Noorla Lane has been re-gravelled.

Junee Township

Work at the sewerage treatment ponds is now complete with gabion rocks armour lining the pond banks to stop erosion. The ponds have now filled back up and are operating normally.

Heavy patches have been sealed in Peel Street and Park Lane.

The rural village of Old Junee and Illabo had gravel placed in numerous potholes on street corners and turning areas.

Following new kerb and gutter placed early in the year, Hare Street and Hart Street have been ripped and reshaped to suit the new gutter. Sealing will be completed later this month.

Page 3 of 11 Customer Private Work Carried Out Grain Corp Supply gravel I Friend Supply gravel Wagga Beach Caravan Park Street sweeper P Halliburton Prepare and seal entrance C Wilson Grade driveways Hart Bros Seeds Supply gravel and grader hire M Wooden Supply gravel

Parks and Gardens

General

Garden and grounds maintenance has been carried out on all parks and gardens, cemeteries, rest areas and sporting fields within the township of Junee and surrounding villages.

Sporting Fields

Burns Park: • Mowing

Laurie Daley Oval: • Mowing

Loftus Oval: • Mowing

Parks and Gardens:

• Mowing/weeding • Pruning • Weed spraying • Replacing of fence at Dobbyn Park

Rest Areas

Wallacetown: • Mowing and edging • Vegetation maintenance • Weed spraying

Illabo: • Mowing and edging • Vegetation maintenance

Bethungra: • Mowing • Weed spraying

Page 4 of 11 Drains and Gutters

• Cleaning of drainage structures • Cleaning of V drains • Gutter cleaning and edging

Street Trees

• Stump grinding • Tree removal • Pruning • Planting

Picket Fence

• Main Street • Dobbyns Park

Cemeteries

• Lawn, Monumental and Rural: • General maintenance including mowing and edging • Maintenance of existing trees • Weed spraying

There were three grave sites prepared for burial in Junee cemeteries during the month of October 2015.

Town Streets

• Mowing of roadside verges, nature strips and open areas. • Gutter cleaning • Green waste removal

Bike Path

• Edging • Mowing • Tree pruning

5[DES] SEWERAGE SYSTEM

Over the month of October, there were three chokes in the services and two chokes in the mains. Sewer main 101H (150mm) in the lane between Ridge and Lillian Streets was extended 44m plus a manhole to service a new dwelling.

Inflow to the treatment plant totalled 31.5ML with 11.1ML being reused. Discharge to the environment had ceased for a short period then recommenced, total for the month was 5.5ML.

A leaking drain pipe seal has been replaced at the Burns Park amenities building.

Page 5 of 11 6[DDES] SOLID WASTE REPORT

Junee Transfer Station

The Junee Transfer Station is functioning well with no issues or incidents at the site.

Rural Transfer Stations

Bethungra, Wantabadgery and Old Junee Shire Council were inspected on 29 October 2015. Some general rubbish had been left which has since been cleared by Council staff.

All other rural transfer stations were inspected and found to be in a satisfactory condition.

7[EO] NOXIOUS WEEDS

• High risk sites and pathways continue to be inspected across the Shire with the added problem of seeing target species through the luxuriant growth.

• The last of Tiger Pear along the Old Gundagai Road was removed on 1 October with the site still excessively wet.

• Inspection of Silverleaf Nightshade along the Olympic Way has revealed no new incursions. This indicates that using the recommended herbicide at the correct stage of growth can get excellent results over this troublesome weed. Of the eight sites sprayed, none have shown regrowth.

• Inspections of Blue Heliotrope along the Olympic Way have also been very successful. Spraying of these sites has revealed no new incursions over quite large areas.

• A large stand featuring local noxious weeds was in attendance at the annual Junee Show. There was much interest in weeds in general.

8[DDES] S.149 CERTIFICATES

Average Processing time (Working Days) for last 10 Certificates 2 days

9[DDES] DEVELOPMENT/COMPLYING DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATIONS

DA/CDC Date Development Address No. Approved 10/2015/45 New Dwelling 15 White Street, Bethungra 6/10/2015 10/2015/46 New Commercial Shed 23 White Street, Bethungra 6/10/2015 10/2015/49 Two New Dwellings 4 John Potts Drive, Junee 9/10/2015 10/2015/50 New Shed 67 Prince Street, Junee 8/10/2015 10/2015/51 New Dwelling 11 Hilton Place, Junee 13/10/2015 10/2015/52 New Verandah 23 Regent Street, Junee 22/10/2015 15/2015/24 New Dwelling 1 Taylor Street, Junee 1/10/2015 15/2015/26 New Patio 48 Belmore Street, Junee 22/10/2015

Page 6 of 11 DA/CDC Date Development Address No. Approved 15/2015/27 New Dwelling 8 Thomas Street, Junee 22/10/2015 15/2015/28 New Shed/Carport 32 Crown Street, Junee 8/10/2015 15/2015/29 New Swimming Pool 14 Loughan Road, Junee 20/10/2015 22 George Street, Old 15/2015/30 Additions to Existing Dwelling 20/10/2015 Junee 15/2015/31 Additions to Existing Shed 30 William Street, Junee 20/10/2015 188 Kameruka Lane, 15/2015/32 Additions to Existing Dwelling 22/10/2015 Wantabadgery 15/2015/33 New Dwelling 3 Hilton Place, Junee 22/10/2015

10[DDES] HEALTH, BUILDING, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTIONS

43 health, building, planning and environmental inspections were carried out during the month of October, 2015.

11[DCS] COMMUNITY TRANSPORT

Page 7 of 11 12[BSO] COMMUNITY AND RECREATION

1. Junee Junction Recreation and Aquatic Centre

a. The Centre is currently operating under its ‘Summer Shoulder’ period with opening hours on the weekend now Saturday (9am – 5pm) and Sunday (10am – 5pm).

b. 2015/2016 Capital Works

i. Planning is continuing with proposed energy efficiency works. It is anticipated that these major works will take place in 2016.

ii. Other outstanding capital works projects for the Centre include replacing the sodium hypochlorite tank and some building renewal works. These projects will be completed in the early part of 2016.

c. The Centre’s latest promotion to attract new members commenced in mid- September and concluded on 8 November 2015. Once again, the promotion was a success with membership numbers going from around 400 in mid-September to a current high of 489 members. This is the highest number of members the Centre has had since the introduction of the new Links reporting system. The challenge now for Centre staff is to retain these members throughout the summer holiday season.

d. The Centre’s ‘Family Open Day’ was held on Sunday, 1 November from 11am to 3pm. With over 350 people through the doors, the day was a success. The giant inflatable obstacle course was the most popular attraction on the day, with the youth of Junee thoroughly enjoying the challenge. Other popular events on the day included the basketball shoot out, Bubble soccer and group fitness sessions. Around 92% of the visitation on the Day was from Junee locals but it was great to see visitors from surrounding areas coming over to see what Junee’s facilities have to offer. CanAssist raised upwards of $800 on the day thanks to the silent auction, raffles and sausage sizzle.

Page 8 of 11 e. Efforts are continuing to ensure the Centre’s waterslide has the appropriate Workcover Certification in place prior to the 2015/2016 Christmas school holidays. The waterslide is a major attraction and it is a priority for staff to keep the process of certification going to ensure it will be available for the busy Christmas period.

f. Learn to Swim and Junee Swim Club activities continue to bring very strong numbers through the Centre. Both of these activities are important to the local community and also to the vibrancy of the Centre.

g. The Junee Aussie Hoops Program commenced at the Centre on Wednesday, 28 October (5-6pm). Aussie Hoops is Basketball Australia’s official junior game development program for children aged 5–10 years. The Program enables participants of all abilities the opportunity to learn basketball in a structured, inclusive and safe environment, developing physical fitness, social skills and an understanding of the sport while having fun. The Junee program will run for eight weeks, finishing on Wednesday, 16 December. Week 1 saw eight kids registered prior to the Program commencing. An additional 10 kids turned up on the day creating a vibrant atmosphere with 18 kids, parents, the four community coaches and the head coach all having fun in the Stadium.

2. Youth Program

a. Youth Council

i. The Youth Council are well into organising their annual event “The Amazing Race” which is planned for Thursday, 21 January. Each council member will be responsible for an activity or element of the event and to fundraise and promote the event.

ii. Two youth council members ran the face painting at the Junee Recreation Centre’s Open Day as a fundraiser for their Amazing Race event. Even though only a small amount was raised, it gave them a great opportunity to practice their skills. More face painting will be conducted at the Markets on Loftus on the 14 November.

b. The planning for the Christmas School Holiday Program is also underway. The Youth Council have decided that we will only run three activities: 1) the Amazing Race; 2) Laser Tag and 3) a movie and bus trip.

c. A funding application for the 2016 Youth Week has been submitted. The final details of the activities for Youth Week will be determined by the Youth Council in the coming months. 2016 Youth Week will be held from 8 to 17 April 2016.

d. Acquittal documentation for the Council run Youth Program is due at the end of November. It is anticipated that all reporting and acquittal information will be completed by the due date.

3. Athenium Theatre

a. Council are receiving more bookings for weddings and events for the Athenium for the remainder of this year and next which is great. The next event in the Theatre will be the Intereach Services Forum and Pop up café on the 17 November followed by the JBT Xmas on Broadway event on the 28 November.

Page 9 of 11

b. Discussions and negotiations are continuing for the Junee Brass Band to relocate to the Athenium Theatre on a more permanent basis. It is likely that their existing home, the Junee CWA house, will no longer be available for their use before too long. The Band will temporarily move to the Athenium while a user agreement is prepared for consideration by the Council.

4. Broadway Museum

a. The new push button automatic door operator for the front door of the Museum has been installed and is operating well.

5. Visitor Information Centre

a. I met with a committee member of the Broadway Historical Society to talk about ways to better staff both the JVIC and the Broadway Museum. We both agreed that it makes more sense to only have one volunteer on for both during a shift. The Broadway Museum representative will take it back to their November meeting and discuss this with the committee including providing formal training and a run sheet to all JVIC volunteers so they can carry out a dual role each shift.

b. The current roster is well staffed on most weekends and some Fridays which is great as we are coming into our busy period. A Christmas thank you morning tea should be organised in early December for all JVIC and Broadway volunteers.

6. Riverina Regional Library (RRL) Advisory Committee Meeting

The bi-annual meeting of the Advisory Committee was held on Wednesday, 28 October in Wagga Wagga. Delegates of the Committee include representation from all participating Councils (including Junee Shire Council), RRL representation and Wagga Wagga City Council staff who support the operation of RRL. Council’s Facilities and Community Development Manager, David Koren, attended representing Junee Shire.

The meeting covered standard RRL operational issues such as financial performance and key initiatives and programs and some specific issues such as the liquidation process for the Upper Murray Regional Library (which had financial implications for RRL). Importantly the meeting appointed the new Chair, Deputy Chair and Executive Committee for the RRL Advisory Committee for 2015/2016. These details will be forwarded to Councils in the RRL Advisory Committee minutes.

Dates were also set for the 2016 Committee meetings:

• Wednesday 30 March 2016 • Wednesday 26 October 2016

Page 10 of 11 13[FA] CUSTOMER SERVICE REQUESTS SUMMARY

James Davis General Manager

Page 11 of 11