On Computer-Based Assessment of Mathematics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ON COMPUTER-BASED ASSESSMENT OF MATHEMATICS DANIEL ARTHUR PEAD, BA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 Abstract This work explores some issues arising from the widespread use of computer based assessment of Mathematics in primary and secondary education. In particular, it considers the potential of computer based assessment for testing “process skills” and “problem solving”. This is discussed through a case study of the World Class Tests project which set out to test problem solving skills. The study also considers how on-screen “eAssessment” differs from conventional paper tests and how transferring established assessment tasks to the new media might change their difficulty, or even alter what they assess. Once source of evidence is a detailed comparison of the paper and computer versions of a commercially published test – nferNelson's Progress in Maths - including a new analysis of the publisher's own equating study. The other major aspect of the work is a design research exercise which starts by analysing tasks from Mathematics GCSE papers and proceeds to design, implement and trial a computer-based system for delivering and marking similar styles of tasks. This produces a number of insights into the design challenges of computer-based assessment, and also raises some questions about the design assumptions behind the original paper tests. One unanticipated finding was that, unlike younger pupils, some GCSE candidates expressed doubts about the idea of a computer-based examination. The study concludes that implementing a Mathematics test on a computer involves detailed decisions requiring expertise in both assessment and software design, particularly in the case of richer tasks targeting process skills. It concludes with the proposal that, in contrast to its advantages in literacy-based subjects, the computer may not provide a “natural medium for doing mathematics”, and instead places an additional demand on students. The solution might be to reform the curriculum to better reflect the role of computing in modern Mathematics. Page i Acknowledgements I would like to offer my sincere thanks to the following, without which this work would have been impossible: The teachers and pupils in the schools who voluntarily assisted in the trials which form a crucial part of this work. Pat Bishop and Rosemary Bailey, who lent their professional experience to the marking of the GCSE-level trials. Carol Craggs for support during the observations of Progress in Maths. Sean McCusker for his help with an awkward Rasch. QCA and nferNelson for funding projects which made parts of the work possible. My colleagues at the University of Nottingham. Page iii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Outline of the study 1.1: Rationale.......................................................................................... 1 1.2: Research Questions............................................................................3 1.3: Outline of the work ........................................................................... 5 Testing “higher order” or “problem solving” skills ................................................................ 5 Computerising existing tests ................................................................................................... 6 Analysing GCSE with a view to computer delivery ...............................................................8 Computerising GCSE mathematics – a design research experiment .....................................8 The author's contribution to this work.................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Key issues in Mathematics Assessment 2.1: Introduction.................................................................................... 11 2.2: The influence of tests on the taught curriculum....................................12 2.3: Achieving “balance” in assessment – a case study................................13 2.4: Assessing Problem Solving, Functional Mathematics and Process Skills ...18 Problem solving vs. “word problems”.................................................................................. 21 2.5: The challenges of computerisation......................................................22 Is mathematics “harder” on computer?.................................................................................22 Capturing working and “method marks”.............................................................................. 23 A natural medium for “doing mathematics”? ....................................................................... 23 Automatic marking............................................................................................................... 25 2.6: The implications of eAssessment for assessment reform .......................25 2.7: A note on “formative assessment”......................................................27 Chapter 3: Assessing problem solving skills: a case study 3.1: Introduction.................................................................................... 29 Page v Table of Contents 3.2: The World Class Tests project............................................................ 30 The brief................................................................................................................................30 Educational principles...........................................................................................................30 3.3: The role of the computer...................................................................34 3.4: Illustrative examples of tasks............................................................ 36 Simulated experiments and “microworlds” .......................................................................... 36 Mathematical games............................................................................................................. 38 Exploring rich data sets.........................................................................................................39 Use of the workbooks........................................................................................................... 41 3.5: The development process..................................................................46 Initial design..........................................................................................................................46 Specification, commissioning and implementation .............................................................. 46 Trial and refinement..............................................................................................................48 Some design challenges........................................................................................................ 49 3.6: Technical and Logistical Challenges.....................................................50 Technical issues.................................................................................................................... 50 Project management issues................................................................................................... 51 3.7: Outcome of the project..................................................................... 52 3.8: Conclusions..................................................................................... 53 Chapter 4: Analysis and Evaluation of Progress in Maths 6-14 Digital Assessments 4.1: Introduction.................................................................................... 55 4.2: The Progress in Maths tests...............................................................56 4.3: Approach........................................................................................ 58 Analysis of the equating study data...................................................................................... 58 Design critique of the questions............................................................................................59 School observations.............................................................................................................. 60 Surveys and interviews......................................................................................................... 61 Relationship between the approaches................................................................................... 62 4.4: Results of the equating study for PIM6 and PIM7..................................62 Is there an ability effect?.......................................................................................................62 Is there a school effect?.........................................................................................................64 Is the order of administration causing an effect? .................................................................. 66 Was there a task effect?.........................................................................................................68 Statistical tests of item differences ....................................................................................... 73 Use of advanced scaling techniques ..................................................................................... 79 Conclusions from the nferNelson Equating Study ................................................................81 4.5: Task design critique & school observations.......................................... 83 Presentation of spoken prompts............................................................................................83