Luton-Dunstable Busway Is, After in a Congested Conurbation, BRT Can Be Many Years in the Making, Nearly with Us Vital to an Integrated Transport Offer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Luton-Dunstable Busway Is, After in a Congested Conurbation, BRT Can Be Many Years in the Making, Nearly with Us Vital to an Integrated Transport Offer BRTHandbook_2013_p01_Cover_BRTHandbook_p01 04/09/2013 12:23 Page 1 The Handbook A review of the key developments 2013/14 Published by: Supported by: Sponsored by: BRThandbook_2013_p02-03_Contents_BRThandbook_p02-03 04/09/2013 12:15 Page 2 BRThandbook_2013_p02-03_Contents_BRThandbook_p02-03 04/09/2013 12:15 Page 3 Introduction| 3 Two is company, the proverb says, but, when it comes to bus rapid transit, is three enough to justify using the term ‘crowd’? rogress is being made, there is no And thirdly, the Luton-Dunstable implemented. Which raises the key doubt of that. Cambridge has been busway, so long in development, appears question of ‘why?’ Have the manifest Pup and running for two years now finally to be ready to get under way. So difficulties in getting a BRT scheme and is continuing to produce ridership that’s two major BRT schemes that have approved, funded and, finally, actually built numbers that must gladden the heart of both come to fruition and also really, really been putting people off taking forward every BRT enthusiast in Britain (and, worked. And let’s hope that the Luton- comparable schemes in their own areas? indeed, elsewhere). The Eclipse BRT Dunstable scheme, despite its tortured and And, if they have, will the manifest success scheme in Hampshire, meanwhile, is also lengthy development, also works like a stories of Cambridge and Hampshire lead now both fully operational and, by charm when it opens later this month. them to dust off a few hitherto shelved seemingly achieving its primary aim of The key question is, of course, where BRT schemes? We like to think that they getting people out of their cars and onto does BRT go next, because there don’t will – because if anything these two the bus, doing exactly what its developers seem to be that many other major projects projects show us that, in the final analysis, wrote on the tin. that are serious close to being all of the hard work is worth it. Contents P5 P16 P26 Interesting times for BRT Bus Rapid Transit in the UK Legal obstacles to BRT The tide is now running in favour of BRT, We chart BRT schemes in operation and Bircham Dyson Bell explain what a BRT says Bob Tebb those that are in the planning stage scheme developer should expect around Britain P6 P18 Getting ready to roll BRT central to Manchester The Luton-Dunstable busway is, after In a congested conurbation, BRT can be many years in the making, nearly with us vital to an integrated transport offer P28 Making buses a better choice Hampshire CC explains how its Eclipse BRT P14 P20 scheme is making a difference The connected journey BRT vs LRT: pros and cons No one likes to queue and, as Vix Do users prefer bus or light rail-based tran- explains, nowadays you don’t have to! sit systems, asks Steer Davies Gleave P22 Cambridge leading the way Two years after its launch, Cambridge’s BRT scheme remains a success story P24 P30 Getting the best use out of it Who’s who in BRT Has the Cambridge busway achieved BRTuk members, and some of the key what it was designed to achieve? consultants and suppliers EDITORIAL OFFICES BRTuk SECRETARY ADVERTISING PRINT & DISTRIBUTION Brought to you by Landor Links, Apollo House, 359 David Eve, Daniel Simpson Hastings Printing Company Ltd, and Kennington Lane, London SE11 5QY Parsons Brinckerhoff E: [email protected] Drury Lane, St Leonards-on-Sea, c/o A Hopcroft, T: 0845 270 7861 East Sussex TN38 9BJ BRTuk MEMBERSHIP OFFICE 6 Devonshire Square, c/o Keith Gellaitry, London EC2M 4YE DESIGN & PRODUCTION © Landor LINKS Ltd & BRTuk Ltd 2013 Dundas & Wilson, Production Dept. Saltire Court, 20 Castle Terrace, E: [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-899650-73-6 Edinburgh EH1 2EN BRThandbook_2013_p04-05_Tebb intro_BRThandbook_p04-05 04/09/2013 12:09 Page 4 BRThandbook_2013_p04-05_Tebb intro_BRThandbook_p04-05 04/09/2013 12:09 Page 5 5 2013: BRT –|we live in| interesting times!| – and indeed the coming months. Look now at the bus ‘humble’ bus – is sys tem in any city, major town or even a BRT currently receiving busy corridor anywhere, and you will see establishment capital support perhaps as evidence of BRT techniques being applied, never before. This is despite the poor initially to the solution of one or two local national economic situation over the past problems. Make those one or two into few months, which has seen passenger seven or eight, as is happening more and levels suffer and ongoing support fall. more frequently, and you have the makings Nevertheless, recovery is beginning to of a BRT corridor! Bob Tebb, Chair, BRTuk appear to bring passengers back to what is, Yet there is still something of a general in a growing number of cases, a very new perception that bus and BRT are different scheme, meanwhile, is now an accepted and delightful animal in bus prod uct terms. species of animal, and that cross- part of bus transit in the area – with such BRTuk itself has been a demonstration fertilisation is impossible or even public acceptance demonstrating its that the tide is now running heavily in inadvisable. Nothing could be further from effectiveness. favour of bus transit; its own direct the truth! Several of the earlier BRT I am looking forward to the Luton- activities have, sadly, been somewhat schemes in the UK did exactly that – they Dunstable guided BRT scheme coming limited recently as its directors and officers developed a bus route (not even on-stream this year, and to the 2013 BRTuk have been so occupied in BRT and bus necessarily a good bus route!) into a BRT conference in Luton – look closely not just development progressions for their own one, either in stages or as a ‘grand slam’, at the excellent guideway elements but companies that they have had little time to thereby encouraging modal shift from also the dramatic route through the centre devote to progressing BRTuk as much as private to public transport and significantly of Luton, with its magnificent new bus they hoped! As an organization we can growing bus patronage. interchange sandwiched perfectly between only apologise for this! Those who are shaking their heads that the railway station and the nearby town So, what IS happening nationally to all this is impossible should, perhaps, take centre. cause these levels of activity? a look at a certain public transport route This is a growing feature of BRT The first element is the very along the Fylde coast. From operating a schemes nationally; they are finally considerable technical capital funding characteristic ‘bus’ type service with achieving proper segregated penetration of support from central Government for frequent stops, pay-as-you-board vehicles town and city centres – giving consistent, greener buses in general; as BRT system of limited and erratic performance and fast and direct access to their shopping, vehicles tend to use the latest and most modernity, the identical route has been business, and social hearts. This is in progressive designs, these are at the transformed this year into an attractive, contrast to what had been hap pening a forefront of such progress. I mentioned higher-performance rapid transit service decade or two earlier (and is still new fuels last year, and the pace here in with easy b oarding at close level platforms, happening in some cities with out-dated such develop ment continues almost at less frequent – but well located – stops, car-dominated thoughts) as buses were exponentially – to the point where it is with short stop dwell times and modern, pushed further and further out from those becoming increasingly difficult to choose attractive, articulated vehicles. centres, denying customers access thereto. which way to go. Bus infrastructure funding For those suspicious of this description, Another long-awaited major scheme is is not being left behind in this. this route is of course not bus – or BRT – now in build; although long known as the Curiously, perhaps, as interest and but the development of the 125-plus year Leigh busway, its future strength will lie in activity in BRT grows almost equally old Blackpool traditional tramway into a part in its accessing, by more conventional rapidly, I see a ‘blurring’ of the technical, light rail route. The bus industry still seems means than guideways, the heart of visual and operational distinctions reluctant to learn from our light rail Manchester city centre – a city that is between BRT and bus. This is NOT a coll eagues, but I have always argued that dramatically putting public transport as the failing, nor a watering down of BRT – but a the simple message “THINK TRAM – DO keystone to its mobility through a mixture rise in the quality of product being BUS” is an essential part of the way to of transit modes. provided by that humble bus I mentioned achieve BRT progress in this country. I hope you find this latest, 2013, edition earlier as part of those investment That’s enough of the theory then. Let’s of the BRTuk Handbook once again processes. look at BRT on the ground. Cambridgeshire interesting and useful, as it demonstrates This growth in ‘better bus’ activity is busway, still the BRT ‘star’ in the UK, that you are part of a well-established, and itself causing something of a rethink within continues its growth and public now very definitely mainstream, transit BRTuk about how best to fulfill our acceptability, with through bus services industry. perceived BRT information exchange role ever further afield (try doing that with rail!) As I conclude each year – good luck for to the industry as a whole, and I hope we and even its do om-mongers seem quieter! the future – and please continue to support can report possible developments in the The Gosport-Fareham ‘Eclipse’ BRT BRTuk in the months ahead.
Recommended publications
  • Fastrack B Gravesend to Temple Hill Via Bluewater Shopping Centre - Valid from Sunday, August 29, 2021 to Thursday, November 11, 2021
    Fastrack B Gravesend to Temple Hill via Bluewater Shopping Centre - Valid from Sunday, August 29, 2021 to Thursday, November 11, 2021 Monday to Friday - Gravesend Garrick Street B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Temple Hill Joyce Green Lane Terminus 0528 0558 0622 0642 0657 0707 0718 0729 0741 0754 0807 0820 0833 0845 0857 0908 0918 0928 0940 0950 1000 1010 1020 Dartford Home Gardens 0539 0609 0634 0654 0712 0723 0735 0747 0759 0811 0823 0835 0848 0900 0911 0921 0931 0941 0951 1001 1011 1021 1031 Dartford Darent Valley Hospital 0550 0620 0645 0705 0724 0736 0748 0800 0812 0824 0836 0848 0901 0913 0923 0933 0943 0953 1003 1013 1023 1033 1043 Bluewater Bus Station 0555 0625 0651 0711 0731 0743 0755 0807 0819 0831 0843 0855 0907 0919 0929 0939 0949 0959 1009 1019 1029 1039 1049 Greenhithe Railway Station 0600 0630 0656 0716 0736 0748 0800 0812 0824 0836 0847 0859 0911 0923 0933 0943 0953 1003 1013 1023 1033 1043 1053 Ingress Park Ingress Abbey 0602 0632 0659 0719 0740 0751 0803 0815 0827 0838 0849 0901 0913 0925 0935 0945 0955 1005 1015 1025 1035 1045 1055 Swanscombe The George and Dragon 0607 0637 0704 0725 0747 0758 0809 0820 0832 0843 0853 0905 0917 0929 0939 0949 0959 1009 1019 1029 1039 1049 1059 Ebbsfleet International Railway Station 0614 0644 0711 0732 0754 0805 0816 0827 0839 0850 0900 0911 0923 0935 0945 0955 1005 1015 1025 1035 1045 1055 1105 Gravesend Garrick Street 0623 0653 0721 0742 0804 0816 0828 0838 0850 0901 0911 0921 0932 0944 0954 1004 1014 1024 1034 1044 1054 1104 1114 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
    [Show full text]
  • Buses As Rapid Transit
    BBuusseess aass RRaappiidd TTrraannssiitt A transport revolution in waiting WWeellccoommee ttoo BBRRTT--UUKK RT is a high profile rapid transit mode that CONTACT BRT-UK combines the speed, image and permanence of The principal officers of BRT-UK are: light rail with the cost and flexibility of bus. BRT-UK Chair: Dr Bob Tebb Bseeks to raise the profile of, and develop a centre b of excellence in, bus rapid transit. b Deputy Chair: George Hazel BRT-UK does not seek to promote bus-based rapid transit b Secretary: Mark Curran above all other modes. BRT-UK seeks to enhance b Treasurer: Alex MacAulay understanding of bus rapid transit and what it can do, and b Membership: Dundas & Wilson allow a fair and informed comparison against other modes. External promotion: George Hazel BRT-UK is dedicated to the sharing of information about b evolving bus-based rubber-tyred rapid transit technology. b Website: Alan Brett For more information please contact us at [email protected]. b Conference organisation: Bob Menzies ABOUT BRT-UK BRT-UK MEMBERSHIP Membership of BRT-UK has been set at £250 for 2007/08. Objectives of the association Membership runs from 1st April-31st March. Membership is payable by cheque, to BRT-UK. Applications for membership The objectives of BRT-UK are: should be sent to BRT-UK, c/o Dundas & Wilson, 5th Floor, b To establish and promote good practice in the delivery Northwest Wing, Bush House, Aldwych, London, WC2B 4EZ. of BRT; For queries regarding membership please e-mail b To seek to establish/collate data on all aspects of BRT
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Decision No (As Appropriate)
    Decision No (as appropriate) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By: Head of Transport and Development, Kent Highway Services To: Environment, Highways & Waste – Policy Overview and Scrutiny Committee Subject: Public Transport Developments, Funding and Initiatives Classification: Unrestricted Summary: This annual report informs members of the principal developments, funding arrangements and initiatives undertaken in the provision of public transport in Kent during 2009/10 and planned for implementation during 2010/11. This year’s report also provides a summary of the principal legislative changes following the Local Transport Act 2008, and the bearing they are having on the delivery of public transport. 1. Introduction (1) Public Transport continues to go from strength to strength in Kent. The County Council has been at the forefront of developing and implementing new initiatives, with new Quality Bus Partnerships (QBPs) signed in Ashford and Dover and similar partnerships planned for Sevenoaks, Shepway and Swale. Passenger numbers have continued to increase year on year. In 2005/06 there were 45.7 million journeys by bus; in 2006/07 48.6 million; in 2007/08 51.7 million; and in 2008/09 55.2 million. (2) During 2009/10 a number of key initiatives such as Kent County Council (KCC) Kickstart funding have delivered new vehicles and service uplifts for the Ashford A-Line operated by Stagecoach and for some of KCC’s supported bus routes. Further improvements are planned for 2010/11, and this report updates Members on progress. 2. Principal Developments (1) Quality Bus Partnerships The Transport Act 2000 and the Local Transport Act 2008 provided for the establishment of Voluntary Partnership Agreements between bus operators, district councils and county councils (see section 4 – Legislation).
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Has Arrived
    BRTHandbook_p01_cover:BRTHandbook_p01 26/10/11 18:35 Page 1 A review of key developments 2011/12 Bus Rapid Transit Has Arrived • World’s longest system opens in Cambridge • Setting standards in Belfast • BRT for low-density suburbs • Ridership results from Adelaide • Achieving quality in ticketing and information Published by Supported by The Handbook BRTHandbook_p02-03_contents:BRTHandbook_p02-03 26/10/11 18:40 Page 2 BRTHandbook_p02-03_contents:BRTHandbook_p02-03 26/10/11 18:40 Page 3 Introduction. 3 The belated but successful opening of the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway has given a real shot in the arm to BRT in the UK, says Rik Thomas he mood of optimism at the BRTuk made being not that far short of a quarter to consultation on its ambitious three- conference in Cambridge in of a million in the first month alone. corridor network of BRT lines, and those are TSeptember was unmistakable. True, a But there was more to it than a bunch of just the projects that were discussed in very large part of this optimism was relieved Cambridgians, because it does detail by speakers at the Cambridge generated by politicians and officers at seem as if a significant number of green conference. Cambridgeshire County Council who, after shoots are about to burst through into the Last year the introduction to this annual a few weeks of tentatively sticking their sunlight more or less simultaneously in the review and handbook for BRTuk said: heads above the parapet once the CGB UK. BRT schemes in Luton and Hampshire “Overall the message is clear – BRT has a scheme opened in August, are now are, hopefully, within months of opening.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Transport and Development in the Thames Gateway
    Relationship between transport and development in the Thames Gateway Contents Front cover......................................................................................................................2 Strategic overview and summary..................................................................................3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................8 2. The scope of the Thames Gateway in 2003 ............................................................11 3. Transport analysis....................................................................................................30 4. Potential scale of development ................................................................................34 5. Transport and development interaction ................................................................48 6. Strategic focus in the Thames Gateway .................................................................62 7. Phasing of transport and development...................................................................66 8. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................69 9. Appendix A: Travel characteristics and capacities...............................................72 10. Appendix B: Planning aspiration forecasts for SE sub areas ............................86 11. Appendix C: Examples from the Netherlands.....................................................89 12. Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Buses with H Igh Level of Service
    Buses with High Level of Service Fundam ental characteristics and recom m endations for decision-making and research Results from 35 European cities Final report ± COST action TU 0603 (October 2007 ± October 2011) Edited by: Brendan Finn (ETTS Ltd), Odile H eddebaut (IFSTTA R DEST), Arno Kerkhof (UITP), François Ram baud (CERTU), O scar Sbert Lozano (C onsultant), Claude Soulas (IFSTTA R GRETTIA). The participants of this COST action, from 14 EU countries, are contributors - list page 4. COST is supported by the EU RTD Fram ew ork program m e ESF provides the COST Office through an EC contract. Forew ord This publication is supported by COST COST- the acronym for European COoperation in Science and Technology- is the oldest and widest European intergovernm ental network for cooperation in research. Established by the Ministerial Conference in N ovem ber 1971, COST is presently used by the scientific com m unities of 35 European countries to cooperate in com m on research projects supported by national funds. The funds provided by COST - less than 1% of the total value of the projects - support the COST cooperation networks (COST Actions) through which, with EUR 30 million per year, more than 30 000 European scientists are involved in research having a total value which exceeds EUR 2 billion per year. This is the financial worth of the European added value which COST achieves. A "bottom up approach" (the initiative of launching a COST Action com es from the European scientists them - selves), "à la carte participation" (only countries interested in the Action participate), "equality of access" (par- ticipation is open also to the scientific com m unities of countries not belonging to the European U nion) and "flexible structure" (easy implem entation and light m anagem ent of the research initiatives) are the main charac- teristics of COST.
    [Show full text]
  • Arriva UK Bus | Arriva UK Trains | Arriva Mainland Europe | Corporate Responsibility
    Contents | Welcome from the chief executive | Who we are | What we do | Contents How we work | Our stakeholders | Our business | Arriva UK Bus | Arriva UK Trains | Arriva Mainland Europe | Corporate responsibility Arriva is one of the largest providers of passenger transport in Europe. Our buses, trains and trams provide more than 1.5 billion passenger journeys every year. We deliver transport solutions for local and national authorities and tendering bodies. For communities and the users of public transport we offer transport choice and the opportunity to travel. Contents 1 Welcome from the chief executive 2 Who we are 4 What we do 7 How we work 10 Our stakeholders 12 Vítejte Our business 14 Arriva UK Bus 16 Arriva UK Trains 22 Velkommen Arriva Mainland Europe 28 Welkom Herzlich willkommen Corporate responsibility 48 Witajcie Our approach 48 Safety 49 Employees 52 Üdvözöljük Environment 56 Benvenuti Community 60 Welcome Bem-vindo Vitajte Bienvenidos Välkommen Merhba Arriva | Sharing the journey 1 Contents | Welcome from the chief executive | Who we are | What we do | How we work | Our stakeholders | Our business | Arriva UK Bus | Arriva UK Trains | Arriva Mainland Europe | Corporate responsibility Arriva has a proven track record of delivering on our commitments. That principle is why we retain so many of our contracts, why we are a valued and trusted partner, and why people enjoy fulfilling and rewarding careers with us. Arriva is on a journey of continuous improvement. modes of transport, in different geographic and We are close to our markets and this enables us to regulatory environments. That experience enables us predict and respond quickly to change including to enter markets new to Arriva, whether by mode or complex legislative requirements and increasingly location, across Europe and potentially beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Thames Gateway Kent Partnership
    Appendix Two Review of the Thames Gateway Kent Partnership Information provided to the Overview Scrutiny Committee March 2017 Page 1 Contents Page 1. Background to the partnership - 3 - A summary to provide details of how, why and when the partnership was formed 2. Partnership objectives - 3 - Details of the objectives that have been set for the partnership and how these help deliver the council’s corporate objectives. 3. Partnership governance arrangements - 4 - A summary of the governance arrangements that are in place for the partnership 4. Performance of the partnership - 5 - Details of how the partnership has been performing over recent years (copies of performance reports will be appended to this paper) 5. Financial management and value for money - 6 - A summary of the overall budget for the partnership, how this is spent and other resources that are used by the partnership. 6. Partner Engagement and Feedback - 6 - A summary of any feedback we have had from our partners with regards to the partnership Review of the Thames Gateway Kent Partnership Page 2 1. Background to the partnership The partnership was originally formed in 2001 as a public and private sector partnership. Gravesham Borough Council formally agreed to become Members of the partnership at the, then, Executive Cabinet meeting in March 2001. The partnership was established with the aim of working towards securing sustainable economic growth across North Kent. The specific aims of the partnership were set in 2001 and have largely remained the same since this date: - To create the best conditions possible to attract investment and deliver sustainable, private sector-led economic growth across North Kent - To promote and enable collaboration between the private and public sectors to help achieve growth - To ensure that the Thames Gateway remains a key priority for Government The partnership agreed a Vision for the Thames Gateway area; to make Thames Gateway Kent the place to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads in Britain
    ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN c < t < r c ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN BY THE LATE THOMAS CODRINGTON M, INST.C. E., F. G S. fFITH LARGE CHART OF THE ROMAN ROADS AND SMALL MAPS IN THE TEXT REPRINT OF THIRD EDITION LONDON SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1919 . • r r 11 'X/^i-r * ' Ci First Edition^ 1903 Second Edition, Revised, 1905 Tliird Edition, Revised, 1918 (.Reprint), 19 „ ,, 19 PREFACE The following attempt to describe the Roman roads of Britain originated in observations made in all parts of the country as opportunities presented themselves to me from time to time. On turning to other sources of information, the curious fact appeared that for a century past the litera- ture of the subject has been widely influenced by the spurious Itinerary attributed to Richard of Cirencester. Though that was long ago shown to be a forgery, statements derived from it, and suppositions founded upon them, are continually repeated, casting suspicion sometimes unde- served on accounts which prove to be otherwise accurate. A wide publicity, and some semblance of authority, have been given to imaginary roads and stations by the new Ordnance maps. Those who early in the last century, under the influence of the new Itinerary, traced the Roman roads, unfortunately left but scanty accounts of the remains which came under their notice, many of which have since been destroyed or covered up in the making of modern roads; and with the evidence now available few Roman roads can be traced continuously. The gaps can often be filled with reasonable certainty, but more often the precise course is doubtful, and the entire course of some roads connecting known stations of the Itinerary of Antonine can only be guessed at.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Business Case Report Kent Thameside – Integrated Door-To-Door Journeys
    Transport Business Case Report Kent Thameside – Integrated Door-to-Door Journeys CO04300262/022 Revision 02 January 2015 Document Control Sheet Project Name: Kent Thameside – Integrated Door-to-Door Journeys Project Number: CO04300262 Report Title: Transport Business Case Report Report Number: 022 Issue Prepared Reviewed Approved Status/Amendment 00 Name: Name: Name: Paul Beecham Tim Lynn Steve Whittaker Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 30/01/15 Date: 30/01/15 Date: 31/01/15 01 Name: Name: Name: Paul Beecham Steve Whittaker Steve Whittaker Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 04/02/15 Date: 04/02/15 Date: 04/02/15 02 Name: Name: Name: Paul Beecham Tim Lynn Steve Whittaker Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 20/02/15 Date: 20/02/15 Date: 20/02/15 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: Contents 1.1 SELEP Schemes – Business Case Preparation ....................................................... 3 1.2 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Specific Scheme ................................................................................................ 3 2 Scheme Summary .............................................................................................. 5 2.1 Introduction to Project ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 Category of Transport Business Case .................................................................. 5 2.3 Overall Summary of Gap Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • RAIL USER EXPRESS 14 July 2015
    RAIL USER EXPRESS 14 July 2015 Welcome to this edition of Rail User Express. For details about group As always, feel free to forward RUEx to a colleague, or to reproduce affiliation to Railfuture, items in your own newsletter (quoting sources). If you want further see website here (from details of any of the stories mentioned, look on the relevant website or, the “Membership Type” failing that, get back to me so I can send you the full text. menu, select “RUG”). We continue with the usual roundup of news items from rail user groups around the UK. As always, I’m very grateful to RUGs that send me their magazines and bulletins. LevenMouth Rail Campaign – stepping outside their comfort zone In a bid to take their message to the people this summer, LMRC are heading out of their regular haunt — the Fife Renewables Innovation Centre at Methil Docks — to meet the general public in a series of ‘roadshows’ as they gather signatures for their petition and tell everyone how important it is that the Leven railway is restored: “The positive response by the local public is overwhelming.” LMRC are looking to recruit a Campaigns Manager with funding from Fife Council. In June, LMRC members had a productive meeting with a Principal Consultant from SYSTRA, the transport consultancy tasked with preparing the formal “options” study - the group was able to provide some useful background information and correct a few factual errors that had been circulated in the past. In parallel with the study, LMRC will be lobbying the Scottish Transport Minister to seek assurances that the Leven railway scheme will receive due consideration for funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Pages 2-18 2011
    UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Introduction This Depot Appendix has been developed based on an idea from Newcastle Depot and after consultation at Driver Manager Group and Local Operations Focus Group it was decided that it should be rolled out across the company as best practice. This Depot Appendix should be used in conjunction with all other publications which include: your Rule Book, Sectional Appendix, Professional Driving/Conductor Handbook and Traction Manuals. Special thanks must go to all concerned in the production of this publication including all the Instructor Drivers and D.T.M.s at Manchester Piccadilly and especially to Buxton Driver Don Coffey who has spent an enormous amount of time at his computer working on the graphics. Early in 2013 various ammendments were made which included the new contact details for BTP and also a lot of information that would be useful to conductors and this resulted in it being issued to them also. Index Subject Page Number Introduction 2 Telephone Numbers: Main Numbers and Control 3 Telephone Numbers: Signaller Phone Numbers 4 Local Instructions 5 Multi-SPAD Signals 5 Areas of Low Adhesion 6 Northern Lines of Route Risk Assessment 6 Hot Spots! 7 Semaphore signal number guide 8 OFF Indicators 9-10 Northern Contingency Plan 11 Station Address and Post Codes 12-14 Its behind You 15 Easy Access Area (EEA's) 16 ECO Driving 17-18 Fire and Hazchem Module Attached Your modules each contain an index Attached Notes We have been made aware that some of the ground position lights in these maps do not exactly replicate the actual signal at the location.
    [Show full text]