DOCSLIB.ORG

Transport Business Case Report Kent Thameside – Integrated Door-To-Door Journeys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transport Business Case Report Kent Thameside – Integrated Door-To-Door Journeys Transport Business Case Report Kent Thameside – Integrated Door-to-Door Journeys CO04300262/022 Revision 02 January 2015 Document Control Sheet Project Name: Kent Thameside – Integrated Door-to-Door Journeys Project Number: CO04300262 Report Title: Transport Business Case Report Report Number: 022 Issue Prepared Reviewed Approved Status/Amendment 00 Name: Name: Name: Paul Beecham Tim Lynn Steve Whittaker Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 30/01/15 Date: 30/01/15 Date: 31/01/15 01 Name: Name: Name: Paul Beecham Steve Whittaker Steve Whittaker Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 04/02/15 Date: 04/02/15 Date: 04/02/15 02 Name: Name: Name: Paul Beecham Tim Lynn Steve Whittaker Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 20/02/15 Date: 20/02/15 Date: 20/02/15 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: Contents 1.1 SELEP Schemes – Business Case Preparation ....................................................... 3 1.2 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Specific Scheme ................................................................................................ 3 2 Scheme Summary .............................................................................................. 5 2.1 Introduction to Project ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 Category of Transport Business Case .................................................................. 5 2.3 Overall Summary of Gap Analysis Exercise ........................................................... 6 2.4 The Transport Business Case .............................................................................. 8 2.5 Context of the Transport Business Case ............................................................. 10 2.6 Scheme Description ......................................................................................... 10 2.7 Existing Situation and Proposed Improvements .................................................. 11 3 Strategic Case .................................................................................................. 24 3.1 Purpose of the Proposed Investment ................................................................. 24 3.2 Strategic Fit – National Context ........................................................................ 24 3.3 Strategic Fit – Regional .................................................................................... 26 3.4 Strategic Fit – Kent Thameside ......................................................................... 27 3.5 Strategic Fit – Integration ................................................................................ 29 3.6 Strategic Fit – Individual Measures .................................................................... 30 3.7 Case for Change - Rationale for the Scheme ...................................................... 34 3.8 Causal Chain ................................................................................................... 34 3.9 Summary of Scheme Objectives ........................................................................ 35 3.10 Critical Success Factors (CSFs).......................................................................... 37 3.11 Stakeholders ................................................................................................... 37 3.12 Scheme Risks .................................................................................................. 44 3.13 Required Powers and Consents ......................................................................... 45 4 Economic Case ................................................................................................. 46 4.1 General KCC Approach to Scheme Economic Case .............................................. 46 4.2 Background ..................................................................................................... 50 4.3 Appraisal Process ............................................................................................ 51 4.4 Options Considered ......................................................................................... 54 4.5 Economic Overview ......................................................................................... 56 4.6 Projected Scheme Usage – Demand Projections ................................................. 60 Doc. Ref.:CO04300262/022 Rev. 02 - 1 - Issued: January 2015 4.7 Detailed Appraisal ............................................................................................ 66 4.8 Value for Money Statement .............................................................................. 68 5 Commercial Case .............................................................................................. 71 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 71 5.2 Scheme Procurement ....................................................................................... 71 5.3 Required Services ............................................................................................ 72 5.4 Potential for Risk Transfer ................................................................................ 73 6 Financial Case .................................................................................................. 74 7 Management Case ............................................................................................ 76 7.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 76 7.2 Project Plan .................................................................................................... 76 7.3 Project Governance, Roles and Responsibilities .................................................. 78 7.4 Availability and Suitability of Resources ............................................................. 80 7.5 Evidence of Previously Successful Scheme Management Strategy ........................ 81 7.6 Project Risks ................................................................................................... 83 7.7 Gateway Review Arrangements ........................................................................ 84 7.8 Project Assurance ............................................................................................ 84 7.9 Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting ................................................................ 84 8 Conclusions and Recommendation .................................................................. 87 8.1 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 87 8.2 Recommended Approach and Next Steps ........................................................... 87 8.3 Value for Money Statement .............................................................................. 87 8.4 Recommendation ............................................................................................ 87 Doc. Ref.:CO04300262/022 Rev. 02 - 2 - Issued: January 2015 1 Introduction 1.1 SELEP Schemes – Business Case Preparation Amey have been commissioned by KCC (Kent County Council) to prepare Transport Business Cases, appropriate to the size and scope of each scheme, for each of the projects which have been allocated Local Growth Fund finance. 1.2 Purpose of Report The overall purpose of this report is to provide a Business Case covering the Kent Thameside: Integrated Door-to-Door Journeys scheme. In doing so it draws on the results of the earlier Gap Analysis exercise, also undertaken on behalf of KCC by Amey. It also forms the basis of a brief to deliver the required elements in order to assist Kent County Council in delivering these or in procuring resource to deliver them. The report broadly follows the 5-Case Model for Transport Business Case preparation, incorporating design and environmental issues as well as a summary of the overall risks in terms of project delivery and project funding approval. This includes: The potential for the project to be called in for review by Department for Transport (DfT) or other bodies before it is delivered The potential for challenge from stakeholders which may jeopardise or delay the project The potential that a subsequent review of the project after implementation may identify issues relating to the delivery of overall outcomes (e.g. job creation or transport modal shift) 1.3 Specific Scheme This scheme, in previous submission to the SELEP, is entitled: Kent Thameside: Integrated Door-to-Door Journeys This describes the function of the proposal, though the scheme itself consists of a number of Local Sustainable Transport Fund (LSTF) capital measures for implementation in Kent Thameside in 2015/16. These measures will compliment and be introduced alongside a number of LSTF revenue measures that were successful in receiving support from the Department for Transport (DfT) in the recent 2015/16 revenue funding round. Doc. Ref.:CO04300262/022 Rev. 02 - 3 - Issued: January 2015 Similar LSTF capital measures are envisaged for the Kent Thameside: Integrated Door- to-Door Journeys scheme in years 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21. However, it is intended that these should draw on the experience gained from implementation of the initial measures and therefore they will be the subject of a further Business Case submission in the latter part of 2015/16, when they can be more clearly defined.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fastrack B Gravesend to Temple Hill Via Bluewater Shopping Centre - Valid from Sunday, August 29, 2021 to Thursday, November 11, 2021
    Fastrack B Gravesend to Temple Hill via Bluewater Shopping Centre - Valid from Sunday, August 29, 2021 to Thursday, November 11, 2021 Monday to Friday - Gravesend Garrick Street B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Temple Hill Joyce Green Lane Terminus 0528 0558 0622 0642 0657 0707 0718 0729 0741 0754 0807 0820 0833 0845 0857 0908 0918 0928 0940 0950 1000 1010 1020 Dartford Home Gardens 0539 0609 0634 0654 0712 0723 0735 0747 0759 0811 0823 0835 0848 0900 0911 0921 0931 0941 0951 1001 1011 1021 1031 Dartford Darent Valley Hospital 0550 0620 0645 0705 0724 0736 0748 0800 0812 0824 0836 0848 0901 0913 0923 0933 0943 0953 1003 1013 1023 1033 1043 Bluewater Bus Station 0555 0625 0651 0711 0731 0743 0755 0807 0819 0831 0843 0855 0907 0919 0929 0939 0949 0959 1009 1019 1029 1039 1049 Greenhithe Railway Station 0600 0630 0656 0716 0736 0748 0800 0812 0824 0836 0847 0859 0911 0923 0933 0943 0953 1003 1013 1023 1033 1043 1053 Ingress Park Ingress Abbey 0602 0632 0659 0719 0740 0751 0803 0815 0827 0838 0849 0901 0913 0925 0935 0945 0955 1005 1015 1025 1035 1045 1055 Swanscombe The George and Dragon 0607 0637 0704 0725 0747 0758 0809 0820 0832 0843 0853 0905 0917 0929 0939 0949 0959 1009 1019 1029 1039 1049 1059 Ebbsfleet International Railway Station 0614 0644 0711 0732 0754 0805 0816 0827 0839 0850 0900 0911 0923 0935 0945 0955 1005 1015 1025 1035 1045 1055 1105 Gravesend Garrick Street 0623 0653 0721 0742 0804 0816 0828 0838 0850 0901 0911 0921 0932 0944 0954 1004 1014 1024 1034 1044 1054 1104 1114 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
    [Show full text]
  • Buses As Rapid Transit
    BBuusseess aass RRaappiidd TTrraannssiitt A transport revolution in waiting WWeellccoommee ttoo BBRRTT--UUKK RT is a high profile rapid transit mode that CONTACT BRT-UK combines the speed, image and permanence of The principal officers of BRT-UK are: light rail with the cost and flexibility of bus. BRT-UK Chair: Dr Bob Tebb Bseeks to raise the profile of, and develop a centre b of excellence in, bus rapid transit. b Deputy Chair: George Hazel BRT-UK does not seek to promote bus-based rapid transit b Secretary: Mark Curran above all other modes. BRT-UK seeks to enhance b Treasurer: Alex MacAulay understanding of bus rapid transit and what it can do, and b Membership: Dundas & Wilson allow a fair and informed comparison against other modes. External promotion: George Hazel BRT-UK is dedicated to the sharing of information about b evolving bus-based rubber-tyred rapid transit technology. b Website: Alan Brett For more information please contact us at [email protected]. b Conference organisation: Bob Menzies ABOUT BRT-UK BRT-UK MEMBERSHIP Membership of BRT-UK has been set at £250 for 2007/08. Objectives of the association Membership runs from 1st April-31st March. Membership is payable by cheque, to BRT-UK. Applications for membership The objectives of BRT-UK are: should be sent to BRT-UK, c/o Dundas & Wilson, 5th Floor, b To establish and promote good practice in the delivery Northwest Wing, Bush House, Aldwych, London, WC2B 4EZ. of BRT; For queries regarding membership please e-mail b To seek to establish/collate data on all aspects of BRT
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Decision No (As Appropriate)
    Decision No (as appropriate) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By: Head of Transport and Development, Kent Highway Services To: Environment, Highways & Waste – Policy Overview and Scrutiny Committee Subject: Public Transport Developments, Funding and Initiatives Classification: Unrestricted Summary: This annual report informs members of the principal developments, funding arrangements and initiatives undertaken in the provision of public transport in Kent during 2009/10 and planned for implementation during 2010/11. This year’s report also provides a summary of the principal legislative changes following the Local Transport Act 2008, and the bearing they are having on the delivery of public transport. 1. Introduction (1) Public Transport continues to go from strength to strength in Kent. The County Council has been at the forefront of developing and implementing new initiatives, with new Quality Bus Partnerships (QBPs) signed in Ashford and Dover and similar partnerships planned for Sevenoaks, Shepway and Swale. Passenger numbers have continued to increase year on year. In 2005/06 there were 45.7 million journeys by bus; in 2006/07 48.6 million; in 2007/08 51.7 million; and in 2008/09 55.2 million. (2) During 2009/10 a number of key initiatives such as Kent County Council (KCC) Kickstart funding have delivered new vehicles and service uplifts for the Ashford A-Line operated by Stagecoach and for some of KCC’s supported bus routes. Further improvements are planned for 2010/11, and this report updates Members on progress. 2. Principal Developments (1) Quality Bus Partnerships The Transport Act 2000 and the Local Transport Act 2008 provided for the establishment of Voluntary Partnership Agreements between bus operators, district councils and county councils (see section 4 – Legislation).
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Has Arrived
    BRTHandbook_p01_cover:BRTHandbook_p01 26/10/11 18:35 Page 1 A review of key developments 2011/12 Bus Rapid Transit Has Arrived • World’s longest system opens in Cambridge • Setting standards in Belfast • BRT for low-density suburbs • Ridership results from Adelaide • Achieving quality in ticketing and information Published by Supported by The Handbook BRTHandbook_p02-03_contents:BRTHandbook_p02-03 26/10/11 18:40 Page 2 BRTHandbook_p02-03_contents:BRTHandbook_p02-03 26/10/11 18:40 Page 3 Introduction. 3 The belated but successful opening of the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway has given a real shot in the arm to BRT in the UK, says Rik Thomas he mood of optimism at the BRTuk made being not that far short of a quarter to consultation on its ambitious three- conference in Cambridge in of a million in the first month alone. corridor network of BRT lines, and those are TSeptember was unmistakable. True, a But there was more to it than a bunch of just the projects that were discussed in very large part of this optimism was relieved Cambridgians, because it does detail by speakers at the Cambridge generated by politicians and officers at seem as if a significant number of green conference. Cambridgeshire County Council who, after shoots are about to burst through into the Last year the introduction to this annual a few weeks of tentatively sticking their sunlight more or less simultaneously in the review and handbook for BRTuk said: heads above the parapet once the CGB UK. BRT schemes in Luton and Hampshire “Overall the message is clear – BRT has a scheme opened in August, are now are, hopefully, within months of opening.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Transport and Development in the Thames Gateway
    Relationship between transport and development in the Thames Gateway Contents Front cover......................................................................................................................2 Strategic overview and summary..................................................................................3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................8 2. The scope of the Thames Gateway in 2003 ............................................................11 3. Transport analysis....................................................................................................30 4. Potential scale of development ................................................................................34 5. Transport and development interaction ................................................................48 6. Strategic focus in the Thames Gateway .................................................................62 7. Phasing of transport and development...................................................................66 8. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................69 9. Appendix A: Travel characteristics and capacities...............................................72 10. Appendix B: Planning aspiration forecasts for SE sub areas ............................86 11. Appendix C: Examples from the Netherlands.....................................................89 12. Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Buses with H Igh Level of Service
    Buses with High Level of Service Fundam ental characteristics and recom m endations for decision-making and research Results from 35 European cities Final report ± COST action TU 0603 (October 2007 ± October 2011) Edited by: Brendan Finn (ETTS Ltd), Odile H eddebaut (IFSTTA R DEST), Arno Kerkhof (UITP), François Ram baud (CERTU), O scar Sbert Lozano (C onsultant), Claude Soulas (IFSTTA R GRETTIA). The participants of this COST action, from 14 EU countries, are contributors - list page 4. COST is supported by the EU RTD Fram ew ork program m e ESF provides the COST Office through an EC contract. Forew ord This publication is supported by COST COST- the acronym for European COoperation in Science and Technology- is the oldest and widest European intergovernm ental network for cooperation in research. Established by the Ministerial Conference in N ovem ber 1971, COST is presently used by the scientific com m unities of 35 European countries to cooperate in com m on research projects supported by national funds. The funds provided by COST - less than 1% of the total value of the projects - support the COST cooperation networks (COST Actions) through which, with EUR 30 million per year, more than 30 000 European scientists are involved in research having a total value which exceeds EUR 2 billion per year. This is the financial worth of the European added value which COST achieves. A "bottom up approach" (the initiative of launching a COST Action com es from the European scientists them - selves), "à la carte participation" (only countries interested in the Action participate), "equality of access" (par- ticipation is open also to the scientific com m unities of countries not belonging to the European U nion) and "flexible structure" (easy implem entation and light m anagem ent of the research initiatives) are the main charac- teristics of COST.
    [Show full text]
  • Arriva UK Bus | Arriva UK Trains | Arriva Mainland Europe | Corporate Responsibility
    Contents | Welcome from the chief executive | Who we are | What we do | Contents How we work | Our stakeholders | Our business | Arriva UK Bus | Arriva UK Trains | Arriva Mainland Europe | Corporate responsibility Arriva is one of the largest providers of passenger transport in Europe. Our buses, trains and trams provide more than 1.5 billion passenger journeys every year. We deliver transport solutions for local and national authorities and tendering bodies. For communities and the users of public transport we offer transport choice and the opportunity to travel. Contents 1 Welcome from the chief executive 2 Who we are 4 What we do 7 How we work 10 Our stakeholders 12 Vítejte Our business 14 Arriva UK Bus 16 Arriva UK Trains 22 Velkommen Arriva Mainland Europe 28 Welkom Herzlich willkommen Corporate responsibility 48 Witajcie Our approach 48 Safety 49 Employees 52 Üdvözöljük Environment 56 Benvenuti Community 60 Welcome Bem-vindo Vitajte Bienvenidos Välkommen Merhba Arriva | Sharing the journey 1 Contents | Welcome from the chief executive | Who we are | What we do | How we work | Our stakeholders | Our business | Arriva UK Bus | Arriva UK Trains | Arriva Mainland Europe | Corporate responsibility Arriva has a proven track record of delivering on our commitments. That principle is why we retain so many of our contracts, why we are a valued and trusted partner, and why people enjoy fulfilling and rewarding careers with us. Arriva is on a journey of continuous improvement. modes of transport, in different geographic and We are close to our markets and this enables us to regulatory environments. That experience enables us predict and respond quickly to change including to enter markets new to Arriva, whether by mode or complex legislative requirements and increasingly location, across Europe and potentially beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Thames Gateway Kent Partnership
    Appendix Two Review of the Thames Gateway Kent Partnership Information provided to the Overview Scrutiny Committee March 2017 Page 1 Contents Page 1. Background to the partnership - 3 - A summary to provide details of how, why and when the partnership was formed 2. Partnership objectives - 3 - Details of the objectives that have been set for the partnership and how these help deliver the council’s corporate objectives. 3. Partnership governance arrangements - 4 - A summary of the governance arrangements that are in place for the partnership 4. Performance of the partnership - 5 - Details of how the partnership has been performing over recent years (copies of performance reports will be appended to this paper) 5. Financial management and value for money - 6 - A summary of the overall budget for the partnership, how this is spent and other resources that are used by the partnership. 6. Partner Engagement and Feedback - 6 - A summary of any feedback we have had from our partners with regards to the partnership Review of the Thames Gateway Kent Partnership Page 2 1. Background to the partnership The partnership was originally formed in 2001 as a public and private sector partnership. Gravesham Borough Council formally agreed to become Members of the partnership at the, then, Executive Cabinet meeting in March 2001. The partnership was established with the aim of working towards securing sustainable economic growth across North Kent. The specific aims of the partnership were set in 2001 and have largely remained the same since this date: - To create the best conditions possible to attract investment and deliver sustainable, private sector-led economic growth across North Kent - To promote and enable collaboration between the private and public sectors to help achieve growth - To ensure that the Thames Gateway remains a key priority for Government The partnership agreed a Vision for the Thames Gateway area; to make Thames Gateway Kent the place to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Luton-Dunstable Busway Is, After in a Congested Conurbation, BRT Can Be Many Years in the Making, Nearly with Us Vital to an Integrated Transport Offer
    BRTHandbook_2013_p01_Cover_BRTHandbook_p01 04/09/2013 12:23 Page 1 The Handbook A review of the key developments 2013/14 Published by: Supported by: Sponsored by: BRThandbook_2013_p02-03_Contents_BRThandbook_p02-03 04/09/2013 12:15 Page 2 BRThandbook_2013_p02-03_Contents_BRThandbook_p02-03 04/09/2013 12:15 Page 3 Introduction| 3 Two is company, the proverb says, but, when it comes to bus rapid transit, is three enough to justify using the term ‘crowd’? rogress is being made, there is no And thirdly, the Luton-Dunstable implemented. Which raises the key doubt of that. Cambridge has been busway, so long in development, appears question of ‘why?’ Have the manifest Pup and running for two years now finally to be ready to get under way. So difficulties in getting a BRT scheme and is continuing to produce ridership that’s two major BRT schemes that have approved, funded and, finally, actually built numbers that must gladden the heart of both come to fruition and also really, really been putting people off taking forward every BRT enthusiast in Britain (and, worked. And let’s hope that the Luton- comparable schemes in their own areas? indeed, elsewhere). The Eclipse BRT Dunstable scheme, despite its tortured and And, if they have, will the manifest success scheme in Hampshire, meanwhile, is also lengthy development, also works like a stories of Cambridge and Hampshire lead now both fully operational and, by charm when it opens later this month. them to dust off a few hitherto shelved seemingly achieving its primary aim of The key question is, of course, where BRT schemes? We like to think that they getting people out of their cars and onto does BRT go next, because there don’t will – because if anything these two the bus, doing exactly what its developers seem to be that many other major projects projects show us that, in the final analysis, wrote on the tin.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAVESEND Coldharbour Road, Gravesend, Kent DA11 8AB Available STP from Q2 2020 Indicative Image Indicative
    TRADE CITY GRAVESEND Coldharbour Road, Gravesend, Kent DA11 8AB Available STP from Q2 2020 Indicative image Indicative 6 new industrial warehouse and trade counter units Unit sizes range from 5,823 sq ft to 13,500 sq ft* * Units can be combined 400 NEW HOMES Sold STC to Bovis/Persimmon oad our R A227 harb Cold Exchanged STP with MEDWAY TOWNS A2 LONDON & M25 6 new light industrial warehousing trade counter units Available STP from Q2 2020 Accommodation sq m sq ft COLDHARBOUR ROAD UNIT GF FF Total GF FF Total Filling Station 1 471 70 541 5,070 753 5,823 UNDER 2 464 70 534 4,994 753 5,748 23.5m OFFER 3 495 70 565 5,328 753 6,082 Exchanged 4 495 70 565 5,328 753 6,082 UNIT 5 STP with 5 543 70 613 5,845 753 6,598 6 549 70 619 5,909 753 6,663 UNIT 4 3,017 420 3,473 32,475 4,521 36,996 11.5m All measurements are GEA UNIT 3 Specification UNIT 2 > B1(c), B2, B8 use > Prominent road side location UNDER OFFER > 6.5m Clear internal height > Electric loading doors > High quality exterior finish > Quick access to A2 Indicative Plan, Subject to planning trade-city.co.uk/gravesend M25 SUTEND-N-SEA A13 TURRCK DARTFRD A2 GRAVESEND A20 A2 RCESTER M20 A228 A249 RAMSGATE Approximate travel distances/times M25 M26 M2 Destination Miles Drive time SEVENOAKS CANTERBURY MAIDSTNE A26 A2 M25 SUTEND-N-SEA A2 A21 A229 A28 A13 0.5 miles 1 min M20 M25 Jct 2 6.0 miles 10 mins ROYAL ASFRD TURRCK Dartford Crossing 8.9 miles 14 mins TUNBRIDGE DOVER ELLS M20 DARTFRD M26 9.0 miles 21 mins A2 GRAVESEND A229 FLKESTNE A26 A21 M20 13.0 miles 21 mins A20 A2 RCESTER Central London 25 miles 54 mins M20 A249 M11 30 miles 50 mins A259 A228 RAMSGATE A21 M25 M26 A26 M2 SEVENOAKS CANTERBURY ASTINGS MAIDSTNE A26 LocationA2 A27 A21 A229 A28 M20 Trade City Gravesend is located on Coldharbour Road, EASTBURNE Gravesend, Kent leading to Wrotham Road which is the main road from Gravesend to the A2 and on to the M2 with access ROYAL ASFRD via the M20 to the port of Dover and the east coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Fastrack a 1 { Gravesend ^ "Fastrack B" 5 "Fastrack A" 2 & B" { Bluewater Temple Hill X80, 474, a 4 { Ingress Park "Fastrack B" 5 "Fastrack B" 1 475, 484
    Greenhithe Station (August 2020) i Onward Travel Information Buses Local area map Rail replacement buses depart from outside this station. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2020 & also map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC BY-SA Main destinations by bus (Data correct at August 2020) DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP Bean 474, 475 A 4 "fastrack B" 5 "fastrack B" 5 Ebbsfleet International { { Swanscombe ^ Station Betsham 474, 475 A 4 484 A 4 484 A 4 "fastrack A 1 { Gravesend ^ "fastrack B" 5 "fastrack A" 2 & B" { Bluewater Temple Hill X80, 474, A 4 { Ingress Park "fastrack B" 5 "fastrack B" 1 475, 484 The Bridge (Nucleus "fastrack A" 2 Lakeside Shopping Centre X80 4 Innovation Centre) Chafford Hundred Lakeside X80 4 Longfield 474, 475 A 4 Station [ Notes Crossways Business Park "fastrack A" 2 New Barn 474, 475 A 4 Bus route "fastrack A & B" and route X80 operate daily. Bus route 484 operates Mondays to Saturdays. Bus routes 474 & 475 operates Monday to Friday early morning and Northfleet Darent Valley Hospital "fastrack B" 1 { "fastrack B" 5 evening peak only from this station (additional buses operate from (High Street/Church) ^ Bluewater Mondays to Saturdays) For bus times and the latest bus service information, please contact Princes Park Stadium "fastrack A" 2 "fastrack B" 1 Traveline on 0871 200 22 33 or contact the bus operator (see below): (Dartford Football Club) Arriva Kent Thameside (for bus routes "fastrack A & B" & 484) call 0344 800 44 11; GO-Coach Hire (for bus routes 474 & 475) call 01732 469 800 or Ensign Bus (for route X80) call 01708 865 656.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Powers Ahead a Review of the Key Developments 2012/13
    BRT Handbook Ads_P01, 02,04,06,14,16,32,34-36 12/09/2012 13:20 Page 1 Bus Rapid Transit Powers Ahead A review of the key developments 2012/13 Reviewing key bus rapid transit developments I Hampshire’s Eclipse brightens things up I Time for the BRT trolleybus? I What Toronto teaches us I The buses from Brazil The Handbook Published by: Supported by: Sponsored by: BRT Handbook Ads_P01, 02,04,06,14,16,32,34-36 12/09/2012 13:20 Page 2 BRT-Contents_P03 12/09/2012 13:30 Page 3 Introduction. 3 Last year it was Cambridgeshire, this year it is Hampshire’s ‘Eclipse’ scheme that is winning all the plaudits; it looks like BRT is here to stay, says Rik Thomas ne universal problem faced by any that it can be a highly efficient and cost running. And both are producing passenger innovative new transport idea effective means of mass transit people have numbers that are very healthy indeed. O(although BRT, of course, is to be persuaded to build schemes, but it is So we now know that BRT works. anything but new) is that nobody wants to hard to do this unless there are already Well, actually, we knew this before, but now be first; no matter how good the idea looks successful schemes to use as exemplars. we have the hard evidence to convince even on paper people are, entirely Which, in turn, means that every the most sceptical. 14 new BRT schemes are understandably, very cautious about successful BRT scheme has an effect that in the pipeline in the UK, apparently – and spending significant amounts of money on a extends far beyond its immediate the term ‘critical mass’ springs to mind.
    [Show full text]