DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Australia Skr Issuing Authority Based on Indigenous Peoples of Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Australia Skr Issuing Authority Based on Indigenous Peoples of Western Australia WESTERN AUSTRALIA SKR ISSUING AUTHORITY BASED ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA 1. BE ADVISED that We, the Indigenous Tribal Peoples mentioned hereunder, as law-abiding Peoples, are invoking the Homestead principle and the Bill of Bracery (32 Hen. VIII, c.9) to stake lawful and legitimate claims upon all the gold and other precious metals present in the land and soil that we first occupied and owned for over 40,000 years prior to colonial settlements; 2. TAKE NOTICE that we did not invite European colonizers upon our land and soil. Europeans set foot upon our land and soil without valid visas and without our consent. They are yet to receive formal immigrant recognition from us as mentioned hereunder; 3. TAKE NOTICE that under customary international law and the disadvantages posed by Section 25 and Section 51(xxvi) of the Constitution of Australia, and despite the Act of Recognition of 13 February 2013 formally recognizing the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, our land and resources’ rights were pre-ordained prior to uninvited colonization; 4. TAKE NOTICE that there are 66 operating gold mines in Australia including 14 of the world's largest, 11 of which are in Western Australian making it the country's major gold producer, accounting for almost 70 per cent of Australia's total gold production. 5. TAKE NOTICE that the six biggest gold mines are Boddington (two million ounces have been mined and extracted since 2012) Fimiston, Jundee, Telfer, and Sunrise Dam. 6. TAKE NOTICE that none of us mentioned hereunder received one penny of the wealth that has been mined off our lands. 7. TAKE NOTICE that we wish and desire to issue Safe Keeping Receipts (SKR) based on the Coinage Act of 1909, and seek the aid and assistance of willing financial institutions to take cognizance of our in-ground wealth using the imperatives of cambistry in order for us to be economically independent. 8. TAKE NOTICE that we are still to be constitutionally recognized as the First Nations of Australia. WE, THE RIGHTFUL OWNERS: • Amangu • Koreng • Arnga • Kurajarra • Bardi • Kurrama • Badimaya • Madoitja • Bailgu • Maduwongga • Baiyungu • Maia • Ballardong • Malgana • Binigura • Malgaru • Bunuba • Malngin • Buruna • Mandara • Djaru • Mandi • Duulngari • Mandjildjara • Dyiwali • Mandjindja • Gija • Mangala • Gooniyandi • Mantjintjarra Ngalia • Gugadja • Mardudunera • Ildawongga • Martu • Inawongga • Mineng • Inggarda • Miriwung • Jaburara • Mirning • Jabirr Jabirr • Miwa • Jadira • Murunitja • Jawi • Nakako • Jukun • Nanda • Kalaako • Nangatadjara • Kalamaia • Nangatara • Kambure • Ngaanyatjarra • Kaneang • Ngaatjatjarra • Karajarri • Ngadjunmaia • Kariera • Ngalia • Kartudjara • Ngarinjin • Keiadjara • Ngarla • Koara • Ngarlawangga • Ngarluma • Tjurabalan • Ngolibardu • Tjuroro • Ngombal • Umiida • Ngurlu • Unggarranggu • Ngurrara • Unggumi • Niabali • Waljen • Nimanburu • Walmadjari • Ninanu • Wardal • Njakinjaki • Wariangga • Njunga • Warrwa • Nokaan • Watjarri • Noongar • Wangai • Nyamal • Wanman • Nyangumarta • Wenamba • Nyigina • Whadjuk • Nyulnyul • Widi • Panyjima • Wiilman • Perrakee? • Wilawila • Pibelmen • Wirdinya • Pindiini • Wirngir • Pindjarup • Worrorra • Pini • Wudjari • Pintupi • Wunambal • Pitjantjatjara • Wurla • Putidjara • Yamatji • Spinifex • Yawijibaya • Tedei • Yawuru • Tenma • Yeidji • Thalandji • Yindjibarndi • Tharrkari • Yingkarta • Tjalkadjara • Yinikutira • Tjeraridjal • Yued THIS CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE IS SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING TRIBAL MEMBERS. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010
    Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010 Appendix D-1 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VOLUME 1: Scope and Profile Government of Western Australia Department of State Development Browse LNG Precinct Strategic Social Impact Assessment Volume I: Scope and Profile August 2009 (updated December 2009) VOLUME 1 Contents Lists of Tables, Figures and Acronyms ......................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 6 List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 9 The Social Impact Assessment Overview .................................................................................. 9 Volume I: Social Impact Scoping and Profiling Report ............................................................. 9 Broome and the Kimberley: Population Now.............................................................. 10 Broome and the Kimberley: Population Projections .................................................. 10 The Population
    [Show full text]
  • Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics &A
    Online Appendix for Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue (2014) Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics & Change Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue The following document lists the languages of the world and their as- signment to the macro-areas described in the main body of the paper as well as the WALS macro-area for languages featured in the WALS 2005 edi- tion. 7160 languages are included, which represent all languages for which we had coordinates available1. Every language is given with its ISO-639-3 code (if it has one) for proper identification. The mapping between WALS languages and ISO-codes was done by using the mapping downloadable from the 2011 online WALS edition2 (because a number of errors in the mapping were corrected for the 2011 edition). 38 WALS languages are not given an ISO-code in the 2011 mapping, 36 of these have been assigned their appropri- ate iso-code based on the sources the WALS lists for the respective language. This was not possible for Tasmanian (WALS-code: tsm) because the WALS mixes data from very different Tasmanian languages and for Kualan (WALS- code: kua) because no source is given. 17 WALS-languages were assigned ISO-codes which have subsequently been retired { these have been assigned their appropriate updated ISO-code. In many cases, a WALS-language is mapped to several ISO-codes. As this has no bearing for the assignment to macro-areas, multiple mappings have been retained. 1There are another couple of hundred languages which are attested but for which our database currently lacks coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015
    Western Australia Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015 Contents Preamble 2 1. Short title 3 2. Commencement 3 3. Noongar lands 3 4. Purpose 3 5. Recognition of the Noongar people 3 6. Effect of this Act 4 Schedule 1 — Noongar recognition statement Schedule 2 — Noongar lands: description Schedule 3 — Noongar lands: map 112—1 page i Western Australia LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015 A Bill for An Act for the recognition of the Noongar people as the traditional owners of lands in the south-west of the State. page 1 Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Bill 2015 Preamble 1 Preamble 2 A. Since time immemorial, the Noongar people have 3 inhabited lands in the south-west of the State; these 4 lands the Noongar people call Noongar boodja (Noongar 5 earth). 6 B. Under Noongar law and custom, the Noongar people are 7 the traditional owners of, and have cultural 8 responsibilities and rights in relation to, Noongar 9 boodja. 10 C. The Noongar people continue to have a living cultural, 11 spiritual, familial and social relationship with Noongar 12 boodja. 13 D. The Noongar people have made, are making, and will 14 continue to make, a significant and unique contribution 15 to the heritage, cultural identity, community and 16 economy of the State. 17 E. The Noongar people describe in Schedule 1 their 18 relationship to Noongar boodja and the benefits that all 19 Western Australians derive from that relationship. 20 F. So it is appropriate, as part of a package of measures in 21 full and final settlement of all claims by the Noongar 22 people in pending and future applications under the 23 Native Title Act 1993 (Commonwealth) for the 24 determination of native title and for compensation 25 payable for acts affecting that native title, to recognise 26 the Noongar people as the traditional owners of the 27 lands described in this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Frontier Massacres in Australia 1788-1930: Sources
    Colonial Frontier Massacres in Australia 1788-1930: Sources © Ryan, Lyndall; Pascoe, William; Debenham, Jennifer; Gilbert, Stephanie; Richards, Jonathan; Smith, Robyn; Owen, Chris; ​ Anders, Robert J; Brown, Mark; Price, Daniel; Newley, Jack; Usher, Kaine, 2019. The information and data on this site may only ​ be re-used in accordance with the Terms Of Use. ​ ​ This research was funded by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council, PROJECT ID: ​ ​ DP140100399. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1340762 Colonial Frontier Massacres in Australia 1788-1930: Sources 0 Abbreviations 1 Unpublished Archival Sources 2 Battye Library, Perth, Western Australia 2 State Records of NSW (SRNSW) 2 Mitchell Library - State Library of New South Wales (MLSLNSW) 3 National Library of Australia (NLA) 3 Northern Territory Archives Service (NTAS) 4 Oxley Memorial Library, State Library Of Queensland 4 National Archives, London (PRO) 4 Queensland State Archives (QSA) 4 State Libary Of Victoria (SLV) - La Trobe Library, Melbourne 5 State Records Of Western Australia (SROWA) 5 Tasmanian Archives And Heritage Office (TAHO), Hobart 7 Colonial Secretary’s Office (CSO) 1/321, 16 June, 1829; 1/316, 24 August, 1831. 7 Victorian Public Records Series (VPRS), Melbourne 7 Manuscripts, Theses and Typescripts 8 Newspapers 9 Films and Artworks 12 Printed and Electronic Sources 13 Colonial Frontier Massacres In Australia, 1788-1930: Sources 1 Abbreviations AJCP Australian Joint Copying Project ANU Australian National University AOT Archives of Office of Tasmania
    [Show full text]
  • (Pristis Microdon) in the Fitzroy River Kimberley,, Westernn Australia
    Biology and cultural significance of the freshwater sawfish (Pristis microdon) in the Fitzroy River Kimberley, Western Australia Report to 2004 A collaboration between Kimberley Language Resource Centre Cover Artwork: Competition winner, freshwater sawfish painting by Joy Nuggett (Mangkaja Arts, Fitzroy Crossing, Western Australia) Report by Dean Thorburn, David Morgan and Howard Gill from the Freshwater Fish Group at the Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research Mel Johnson, Hugh Wallace-Smith, Tom Vigilante, Ari Gorring, Ishmal Croft and Jean Fenton Land + Sea Unit Numerous language experts and people of the west Kimberley in conjunction with the Kimberley Language Resource Centre Our sincere gratitude is extended to the Threatened Species Network and World Wide Fund For Nature for providing the funds for this project. Fishcare WA and Environment Australia also made a substantial financial contribution to the project . 2 Project Summary During a collaborative study involving researchers and members from Murdoch University, the Kimberley Land Council, the Kimberley Language Resource Centre and numerous communities of the west Kimberley, a total of 79 endangered freshwater sawfish Pristis microdon were captured (and released) from King Sound and the Fitzroy, May and Robinson rivers between 2002 and 2004. Forty of these individuals were tagged. This culturally significant species, is not only an important food source, but is included in a number of stories and beliefs of the peoples of the Fitzroy River, where it is referred to as ‘galwanyi’ in Bunuba and Gooniyandi, ‘wirridanyniny’ or ‘pial pial’ in Nyikina, and ‘wirrdani’ in Walmajarri (see Chapter 2). In relation to the biology and ecology of the species (Chapter 1), of the 73 individuals sexed, 43 were female, ranging in length from 832 to 2770 mm TL, and 30 were male, ranging in length from 815 to 2350 mm TL.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal Languages South of the Kimberley Region
    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series C - 124 HANDBOOK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES SOUTH OF THE KIMBERLEY REGION Nicholas Thieberger Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Thieberger, N. Handbook of Western Australian Aboriginal languages south of the Kimberley Region. C-124, viii + 416 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1993. DOI:10.15144/PL-C124.cover ©1993 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Pacific Linguistics is issued through the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES c: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES D: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: T.E. Dutton, A.K. Pawley, M.D. Ross, D.T. Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W.Bender KA. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics DavidBradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhausler Monash University University of Adelaide S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. KJ. Franklin KL. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W.Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W.Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K Halliday W.A.L. Stokhof University of Sydney University of Leiden E. Haugen B.K T' sou Harvard University City Polytechnic of Hong Kong A. Healey E.M. Uhlenbeck Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Leiden L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedures for Acknowledgment of Country and Welcome to Country
    PROCEDURES FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY AND WELCOME TO COUNTRY If you require any assistance in regards to the preparation of the Welcome to Country or Acknowledgement of Country, please contact Reverend Gary van Heerden, Director of Service and Citizenship ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY An Acknowledgement of Country is a way for all people to show awareness of and respect for Aboriginal cultures and heritage, and the ongoing relationship the traditional custodians have with their land or waters. Both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people can perform ‘Acknowledgement of Country’. It is a demonstration of respect dedicated to the traditional custodians of the land (or sea) where the event, meeting, school function or conference takes place. It can be formal or informal. Need to know o No set protocols or wording - we encourage you to personalise it o No elaborate ceremony, simply a few words o Offered at the beginning of a meeting, speech or fomal occasion o Minimum standard protocol for any meeting or gathering To do o Find out the name of the Abroginal group and nation (At Scotch, this is the Whadjuk people of the Noongar nation) o Find out how to properly pronounce them. Main criteria for an Acknowledgement of Country Custodians, not Use “traditional custodians” and not “traditional owners” as Aboriginal people owners don’t own the land. Include both groups Always use “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders” to include both distinct indigenous groups. Respect Elders Use capitalised “Elders” as a sign of respect. Include land Always include a reference to Aboriginal land.
    [Show full text]
  • AR Radcliffe-Brown]
    P129: The Personal Archives of Alfred Reginald RADCLIFFE-BROWN (1881- 1955), Professor of Anthropology 1926 – 1931 Contents Date Range: 1915-1951 Shelf Metre: 0.16 Accession: Series 2: Gift and deposit register p162 Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown was born on 17 January 1881 at Aston, Warwickshire, England, second son of Alfred Brown, manufacturer's clerk and his wife Hannah, nee Radcliffe. He was educated at King Edward's School, Birmingham, and Trinity College, Cambridge (B.A. 1905, M. A. 1909), graduating with first class honours in the moral sciences tripos. He studied psychology under W. H. R. Rivers, who, with A. C. Haddon, led him towards social anthropology. Elected Anthony Wilkin student in ethnology in 1906 (and 1909), he spent two years in the field in the Andaman Islands. A fellow of Trinity (1908 - 1914), he lectured twice a week on ethnology at the London School of Economics and visited Paris where he met Emily Durkheim. At Cambridge on 19 April 1910 he married Winifred Marie Lyon; they were divorced in 1938. Radcliffe-Brown (then known as AR Brown) joined E. L. Grant Watson and Daisy Bates in an expedition to the North-West of Western Australia studying the remnants of Aboriginal tribes for some two years from 1910, but friction developed between Brown and Mrs. Bates. Brown published his research from that time in an article titled “Three Tribes of Western Australia”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 43, (Jan. - Jun., 1913), pp. 143-194. At the 1914 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Melbourne, Daisy Bates accused Brown of gross plagiarism.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER JULY 2019 5 40 Years Walking the Long Road to Justice 5 Ngarrawanji, Yurrinyagem Taam and Malarngowem Native Title Determinations
    dfsf KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL NEWSLETTER 2019 JULY • GETTING BACK COUNTRY • CARING FOR COUNTRY • SECURING THE FUTURE PO •Box GETTING 2145 Broome BACK COUNTRYWA 6725 Ph:• CARING (08) 9194 FOR 0100 COUNTRY Fax: (08) • SECURING 9193 6279 THEwww.klc.org.au FUTURE Don’t miss pages 4 – 7 for all the latest on the Ngarrawanji, Yurriyangem Taam and Malarngowen native title determinations! 4 KLC supports Traditional Owners over unauthorised land clearing Nyikina Mangala Traditional owners have confirmed an international corporation is undertaking a land-clearing operation on Yakka Munga Station and has breached a registered Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) and destroyed important cultural sites. On the 5th of June 2019 Traditional Owners discovered at Yakka Munga Station and confirmed that the management company Shanghai Zenith has begun clearing land to make way for what we believe are irrigation channels and to harvest water. Aboriginal people are warned that this newsletter may contain images of deceased people. Mr Skinner addresses Tom Lyon, Noonkanbah Photo: Michael Gallagher Looking back on the KLC aspiration of Aboriginal people to protect 1999 - 20 years ago their sacred sites and their relationship Conservation Reserves to land. Mining companies want to deal with Aboriginal people on terms dictated CALM reserves cover 4 per cent of by the company and not as a result of the Kimberley. CALM has plans to turn paper negotiated agreements between another 6 per cent of the Kimberley land themselves and the appropriate groups. and sea country into national parks. All The practice of mining companies of it is within native title claim areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Innawonga and Bunjima People Native Title Application Wc96/61; Wad6096/98
    INNAWONGA AND BUNJIMA PEOPLE NATIVE TITLE APPLICATION WC96/61; WAD6096/98. MARTU IDJA BANYJIMA PEOPLE NATIVE TITLE APPLICATION WC98/62; WAD 6278/98 COMMENTS ON THE KINGSLEY PALMER ANTHROPOLOGIST’S REPORT 2010 by William B. Day PhD May, 2011 1 Introduction 1. The report by Kingsley Palmer presents a good case for a single Banyjima claim by arguing that rights to land in Banyjima society follow a cognative descent system through matrilineal and patrilineal descent. After presenting well-supported evidence of patrilineal descent of rights in Banyjima society (Paragraphs 205, 528, 530, 571), Palmer (Paragraph 496) speculates that it is possible that a preference for patrilineal descent may have become lessened as a result of demographic changes (see Paragraph Error: Reference source not found). Palmer then uses the historical evidence of descent of rights to support a supposed movement towards a cognative system as a legitimate extension of a customary system (Paragraph 206). However, it is suggested in a cognative system a person would have 16 choices of rights from great-great grandparents and 32 choices from another generation back. Such a system would be unworkable. 2. Similarly, Palmer (Paragraph 499) describes a change from defined estates to ‘coalesced estates’ as ‘radicular, since the contemporary way of defining country is developed from and based upon the customary system’ and therefore not a break with the past. The former analysis of continuity may be justified; however, as I will argue, within the Fortescue Banyjima there is evidence that the patrilineal descent of rights has continued through apical ancestors Pirripuri and Wirrilimarra, and putative descendants and that these male descendants continue to be keepers of ‘fundamental rights’ and esoteric ritual knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Countries of the North-West: Literature Review on Indigenous
    SEA COUNTRIES OF THE NORTH-WEST Literature review on Indigenous connection to and uses of the North West Marine Region Prepared by Dr Dermot Smyth Smyth and Bahrdt Consultants For the National Oceans Office Branch, Marine Division, Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources * July 2007 * The title of the Department was changed to Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts in late 2007. SEA COUNTRIES OF THE NORTH-WEST © Commonwealth of Australia 2007. This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts or the Minister for Climate Change and Water. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Texts and Other Sources
    7 Early texts and other sources Introduction In order to demonstrate that native title has survived, the court will require that the laws and customs of the claimant society be shown not only to have survived substantially uninterrupted but also to have remained ‘traditional’1 in their content. What exactly is to be understood by the use of the term ‘traditional’ has been subject to extensive debate.2 Most, if not all, of the ethnography relevant to a native title inquiry will demonstrate the fact of some form of change. This is unsurprising since few anthropologists would argue for an unchanging society. It is the degree and measure of the change against customary systems that is subject to contestation. In short, 1 ‘A traditional law or custom is one which has been passed from generation to generation of a society, usually by word of mouth and common practice. But in the context of the Native Title Act, “traditional” carries with it two other elements in its meaning. First, it conveys an understanding of the age of the traditions: the origins of the content of the law or custom concerned are to be found in the normative rules of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander societies that existed before the assertion of sovereignty by the British Crown. It is only those normative rules that are “traditional” laws and customs. Second, and no less important, the reference to rights or interests in land or waters being possessed under traditional laws acknowledged and traditional customs observed by the peoples concerned, requires that the normative system under which the rights and interests are possessed (the traditional laws and customs) is a system that has had a continuous existence and vitality since sovereignty.
    [Show full text]