Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 209/Wednesday, October 29, 2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 209/Wednesday, October 29, 2003 61714 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2003 / Notices Plainfield Public Library, 1120 Stafford comments received, and any final ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at Road, Plainfield, IN 46168, 317–839– disposition in person in the Dockets Federal Aviation Administration, 800 6602. Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Independence Avenue, SW., Federal Aviation Administration, Monday through Friday, except Federal Washington, DC 20591, 10th floor, Chicago Airports District Office, 2300 holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone McCracken Room. E. Devon, Suite 320, Des Plaines, IL 1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 60018. of the NASSIF Building at the Gerri Robinson, Federal Aviation Indianapolis Airport Authority, Department of Transportation at the Administration, 800 Independence Indianapolis International Airport, above address. Also, you may review Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, 2500 South High School Road, public dockets on the Internet at http:/ telephone (202) 267–9678; fax (202) Indianapolis, IN 46241. /dms.dot.gov. 267–5075; e-mail Questions may be directed to the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [email protected]. individual named above under the Caren Centorelli, Office of Rulemaking heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION (ARM–1), Federal Aviation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under CONTACT. Administration, 800 Independence section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463; 5 U.S.C. Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois, October 7, Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. 2003. Tel. (202) 267–8029. App. II), notice is therefore given of a meeting of the Executive Committee to Thomas E. Salaman, Petition for Authorization To Exceed be held on November 13, 2003, at the Acting Manager, Chicago Airports District Mach 1 Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Office, FAA Great Lakes Region. Docket No.: FAA–2003–16264. Independence Avenue SW., [FR Doc. 03–27275 Filed 10–28–03; 8:45 am] Petitioner: Scaled Composites. Washington, DC 20591. The agenda will BILLING CODE 4910–13–M Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR include: 91.817, Appendix B to Part 91. • New Executive Committee Leadership Description of Relief Sought: To allow • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION petitioner limited and conditional flight Air Traffic Issue Area • operations that exceed Mach 1. Title 14 Committee Schedule for 2004 Federal Aviation Administration • Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Future of ARAC [Summary Notice No. PE–2003–62] part 91, subpart I-Operating Noise Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Limits, addresses civil aircraft sonic Committee vs. Aviation Rulemaking Petition for Authorization To Exceed boom under § 91.817. An operator must Committees (ARCs) Mach 1; Summary of Petition Received comply with the flight conditions and FY 04 Full ARAC membership AGENCY: Federal Aviation limitations designated by the FAA in meeting Administration (FAA), DOT. any authorization to exceed Mach 1 • prescribed under appendix B of this Submission of electronic and paper ACTION: Notice of request for an recommendations to Federal Aviation authorization to exceed Mach 1. part. The petitioner is requesting that it be allowed to conduct developmental Administration • SUMMARY: This notice summarizes a flight operations of the supersonic Submission of working group meeting petition requesting use of a special flight SpaceShipOne aircraft over Edwards Air dates for ARAC calendar authorization procedure in FAA Force Base, known as the ‘‘R–2508 • Issue Area Status Reports from regulations. The purpose of this notice Complex,’’ located in Los Angeles and Assistant Chairs is to improve the public’s awareness of, Kern counties in California. • Remarks from other Executive and participation in, this aspect of Issued in Washington, DC, on October 23, Committee members FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither 2003. Attendance is open to the interested publication of this notice nor the Donald P. Byrne, public but is limited to the space inclusion or omission of information in Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. available. The FAA will arrange the summary is intended to affect the [FR Doc. 03–27274 Filed 10–28–03; 8:45 am] teleconference ability for individuals legal status of any petition or its final BILLING CODE 4910–13–P wishing to join in by teleconference if disposition. we receive that notice by November 7, DATES: Comments on petition received 2003. Arrangements to join in by must identify the petition docket DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION teleconference can be made by number involved and must be received contacting the person listed in the FOR on or before November 7, 2003. Federal Aviation Administration FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. ADDRESSES: Send comments on any Callers outside the Washington Executive Committee of the Aviation petition to the Docket Management metropolitan area will be responsible for Rulemaking Advisory Committee; System, U.S. Department of paying long-distance charges. Meeting Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 The public must arrange by November Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC AGENCY: Federal Aviation 7 to present verbal statements at the 20590–0001. You must identify the Administration (FAA), DOT. meeting. The public may present docket number FAA–2003–16264 at the ACTION: Notice of meeting. written statements to the executive beginning of your comments. If you committee by providing 25 copies to the wish to receive confirmation that FAA SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice Executive Director, or by bringing the received your comments, include a self- to advise the public of a meeting of the copies to the meeting. addressed, stamped postcard. Executive Committee of the Federal If you are in need of help or require You may also submit comments Aviation Administration Aviation a reasonable accommodation for this through the Internet to http:// Rulemaking Advisory Committee. meeting, please contact the person listed dms.dot.gov. You may review the public DATES: The meeting is scheduled for under the heading FOR FURTHER docket containing the petition, any November 13, 2003, at 10 a.m. INFORMATION CONTACT. VerDate jul<14>2003 15:44 Oct 28, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM 29OCN1 AVIATION RULEMAKING ADVISORY COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECORD OF MEETING MEETING DATE: November 13, 2003 MEETING TIME: 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. LOCATION: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., SW McCracken Room Washington, DC 20591 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) meeting in a Federal Register notice published October 29, 2003 (68 FR 61714). HTML ATTENDEES: Executive Committee Members John Swihart Helicopter Association International Rotorcraft Issues, Assistant Chair James Hurd National Air Disaster Alliance/Foundation Public Interest Representative Tony Fazio Federal Aviation Administration ARAC, Executive Director Ron Priddy National Air Carrier Association Chair Ian Redhead Airports Council International, NA Airport Certification Issues, Assistant Chair Bill Edmunds Air Line Pilots Association Air Carrier Operations Issues, Assistant Chair Craig Bolt Pratt & Whitney ARAC, Vice Chair Edmond Boullay Joint Aviation Authority David A. Hilton Gulfstream Noise Certification Issues, Assistant Chair W. C. Heath Boeing Alternate for Bill Schultz Aircraft Certification Procedures Issues Attendees Carolina Forrester Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking Brenda Courtney Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking Gerri Robinson Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking Caren Centorelli Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking Joe Singleton Inside FAA Dean A. Gissendanner GE Aircraft Engines Ida Klepper Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking Gary Christensen Airline Dispatchers Federation Norm Joseph Airline Dispatchers Federation Dave Cann Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards Service, Aircraft Maintenance Division Speaker Nicholas Sabatini Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Regulation and Certification COMMITTEE ADMINISTRATION (WORD) The Executive Director, Tony Fazio, called the meeting to order at 10:10 AM. He read the required Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) statement, explained that Glenn Rizner had stepped down as the Executive Committee Chair, and welcomed Mr. Ron Priddy (former Vice Chair) as the new Chair of the Executive Committee. (WORD) Mr. Priddy welcomed everyone to the meeting and introduced Craig Bolt as the new Vice Chair of ARAC’s Executive Committee. Mr. Priddy then introduced Associate Administrator for Regulation and Certification, Mr. Nicholas Sabatini. The Executive Committee members and those attending the meeting introduced themselves, and Mr. Sabatini shared his thoughts about the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) and Aviation Rulemaking Committees (ARC’s). Associate Administrator’s remarks: Mr. Sabatini thanked everyone and remarked that ARAC supports the work of the FAA. ARAC enables the agency to surround itself with the leaders and team members who have the talent to help the FAA move forward in the regulatory arena. He referred to ARAC as an innovative approach to leadership and complimented ARAC on the recently published ETOPS rule, calling it a challenging effort and major rule that was shared by the FAA and ARAC. Mr. Sabatini addressed the use of ARC’s by the agency. He explained the agency plans to use
Recommended publications
  • Modification No. 005 to Contract No. NRC-33-11-325
    US NRC - Ho ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIL STOP 3WFN-05-C64MP WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 DELL SERVICES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INC 8270 WILLOW OAKS CORPORATE DR FATRFAX VA 220314514 The abow ma tered so- I ", Manerided m set fat in Ieto 141 The hour an da* cqilledf McWs of Ofrs -j isaexied. jis no exisixid Oilers rrujaeanolivedge MeOWfof Iftharrniernta prior to Viaehour arid dabespecifed in tife solofajon of -s aryunded , by one of Stefojowbig me~oda: (a) By owaripleligi itemr 8arid 15.arid raftmn __ __ copon of Mtewm~enhnun (b) By adwinoviedgtogiaoWdp of Viis anandelefit on each copy ofte o~w taibiiftied; or (c) By seper letter or tetegm whch Incudkes a ref• n o owe imiaon d nwKkTmnbem FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDOGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PFRORTO THE HOUR AMD DATESPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER Ifby vfte of tis antendyient you desi to dvage an offer saready ab e. wih dmwte May be nsde by elefgramor letter. Provided each telegramof lefter makes refernce S1edueolialimto andUdarnardmenl, 00 to received pqw so tu opefta h" &Wdasecifed- 12.ýACCOUINTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (ff req~iad See Schedule I& THIlSITr ONLY APPLIES TO MOC1U1IATIOWOF CONTRACT1SOS. ITMOOIEZ lTEMCONTRACTM R NO. AS DOCRISMN InM 14. ChWCKO A- THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT T(Sp( sutojy)~ecify THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MAE IN THE CONTRACT OROER NO. IN ITEM 10A. B.THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS 1100011P* 7~1, EinUSTE01111dTRATI' CHANGES (&Midas dOites In pamwv ollt. AppmTonekn d3e, ef) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025
    Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025 Challenges and Opportunities The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) enters into its third decade with commitments for a renewed and deepened engagement between Asia and Europe. After 20 years, and with tremendous global and regional changes behind it, there is a consensus that ASEM must bring out a new road map of Asia–Europe connectivity and cooperation. It is commonly understood that improved connectivity and increased cooperation between Europe and Asia require plans that are both sustainable and that can be upscaled. Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities, a joint work of ERIA and the Government of Mongolia for the 11th ASEM Summit 2016 in Ulaanbaatar, provides the ideas for an ASEM connectivity road map for the next decade which can give ASEM a unity of purpose comparable to, if not more advanced than, the integration and cooperation efforts in other regional groups. ASEM has the platform to create a connectivity blueprint for Asia and Europe. This ASEM Connectivity Vision Document provides the template for this blueprint. About ERIA The Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) was established at the Third East Asia Summit (EAS) in Singapore on 21 November 2007. It is an international organisation providing research and policy support to the East Asia region, and the ASEAN and EAS summit process. The 16 member countries of EAS—Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Viet Nam, Australia, China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, and New Zealand—are members of ERIA. Anita Prakash is the Director General of Policy Department at ERIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    A quantitative figure-of-merit approach for optimization of an unmanned Mars Sample Return mission Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Preiss, Bruce Kenneth, 1964- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 06/10/2021 06:30:51 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/278010 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition
    1st IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition Bali, Indonesia November 17–19 , 2014 For Professionals. By Professionals. "Building the Trans-Asia Highway" Bali’s Mandara toll road Executive Summary International Road Federation Better Roads. Better World. 1 International Road Federation | Washington, D.C. ogether with the Ministry of Public Works Indonesia, we chose the theme “Building the Trans-Asia Highway” to bring new emphasis to a visionary project Tthat traces its roots back to 1959. This Congress brought the region’s stakeholders together to identify new and innovative resources to bridge the current financing gap, while also sharing case studies, best practices and new technologies that can all contribute to making the Trans-Asia Highway a reality. This Congress was a direct result of the IRF’s strategic vision to become the world’s leading industry knowledge platform to help countries everywhere progress towards safer, cleaner, more resilient and better connected transportation systems. The Congress was also a reflection of Indonesia’s rising global stature. Already the largest economy in Southeast Asia, Indonesia aims to be one of world’s leading economies, an achievement that will require the continued development of not just its own transportation network, but also that of its neighbors. Thank you for joining us in Bali for this landmark regional event. H.E. Eng. Abdullah A. Al-Mogbel IRF Chairman Minister of Transport, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Indonesia Hosts the Region’s Premier Transportation Meeting Indonesia was the proud host to the 1st IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition, a regional gathering of more than 700 transportation professionals from 52 countries — including Ministers, senior national and local government officials, academics, civil society organizations and industry leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Highway Handbook United Nations
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC ASIAN HIGHWAY HANDBOOK UNITED NATIONS New York, 2003 ST/ESCAP/2303 The Asian Highway Handbook was prepared under the direction of the Transport and Tourism Division of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. The team of staff members of the Transport and Tourism Division who prepared the Handbook comprised: Fuyo Jenny Yamamoto, Tetsuo Miyairi, Madan B. Regmi, John R. Moon and Barry Cable. Inputs for the tourism- related parts were provided by an external consultant: Imtiaz Muqbil. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has been issued without formal editing. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION TO THE ASIAN HIGHWAY………………. 1 1. Concept of the Asian Highway Network……………………………… 1 2. Identifying the Network………………………………………………. 2 3. Current status of the Asian Highway………………………………….. 3 4. Formalization of the Asian Highway Network……………………….. 7 5. Promotion of the Asian Highway……………………………………... 9 6. A Vision of the Future………………………………………………… 10 II. ASIAN HIGHWAY ROUTES IN MEMBER COUNTRIES…... 16 1. Afghanistan……………………………………………………………. 16 2. Armenia……………………………………………………………….. 19 3. Azerbaijan……………………………………………………………... 21 4. Bangladesh……………………………………………………………. 23 5. Bhutan…………………………………………………………………. 27 6. Cambodia……………………………………………………………… 29 7. China…………………………………………………………………... 32 8. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea……………………………… 36 9. Georgia………………………………………………………………... 38 10. India…………………………………………………………………… 41 11. Indonesia………………………………………………………………. 45 12. Islamic Republic of Iran………………………………………………. 49 13 Japan…………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • University of South Florida at Tampa Student Government Statutes
    University of South Florida at Tampa Student Government Statutes Statutes updated and certified accurate on 1/10/2018 Page 1 of 171 Pro Tempore Yusef Shafiq, YS Table of Contents Commented [AH1]: New University of South Florida at Tampa Student Government Statutes ................................................... 1 Title 1 System of SG Statutes ................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 100 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 101 Amendments ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 102 Symbols ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 103 Acronyms and Terms ........................................................................................................................... 10 Title 2 Membership Procedures ...........................................................................................................12 Chapter 200 Membership............................................................................................................................................ 13 Chapter 201 Code of Ethics ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Thousand Commandments
    Ten Thousand Commandments An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State by Clyde Wayne Crews Jr. Competitive Enterprise Institute Ten Thousand Commandments An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State 2010 Edition by Clyde Wayne Crews Jr. Executive Summary President Barack Obama’s federal budget for Regulation: A Hidden Tax fiscal year (FY) 2011 proposes $3.83 tril- lion in discretionary, entitlement, and inter- Those costs fully convey the federal govern- est spending.1 In the previous fiscal year, the ment’s on-budget scope, and they are so- president had proposed $3.552 trillion. For bering enough. Yet the government’s reach reference, George W. Bush had proposed The government’s the first-ever $3 trillion U.S. budget. In fact, extends well beyond the taxes that Washing- President Bush was also the first to propose a ton collects and the deficit spending and bor- reach extends well $2 trillion federal budget—in 2002, a scant rowing now surging. Federal environmental, beyond the taxes eight years ago.2 safety and health, and economic regulations cost hundreds of billions of dollars every year that Washington Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office over and above the costs of the official federal (CBO) projects FY 2010 spending will end outlays that now dominate the policy agenda. collects and the up at $3.524 trillion.3 The result: thanks to the bailout and “stimulus” frenzy, a projected Firms generally pass along to consumers the deficit spending FY 2010 deficit of a previously unthinkable costs of some taxes. Likewise, some regula- $1.349 trillion, down slightly from 2009.4 tory compliance costs that businesses face and borrowing will find their way into consumer prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction 14A Final Draft.Vp
    OUR STAFF Stephen Album Paul Montz Director of Islamic & Early Indian Numismatics Director of World Coins Steve has been serving the Paul joined the staff in January numismatic community since 2011. He attended UC Davis 1960. In 1976 he began dealing from 1975-80, earning bachelor's nearly exclusively in Islamic and and master's degrees in Indian coins. He has authored Agricultural Science & several books including the Management and Agronomy, Catalogue of California Trade respectively. He began working Tokens, Volumes I & II in 1972 in the numismatic field in the and 1974 respectively. 1977 saw 1970's. In 1981, he founded the release of his complete rewrite of Marsden's Olde World Numismatics in Chico, CA, a business he Numismata Orientalia Illustrata, a guide to Islamic ran for 30 years, focusing on A-Z world coins, before and Oriental coins with values. In 1993 he published merging with Stephen Album Rare Coins. He has put A Checklist of Islamic Coins, which now in its second out price lists for many years and has been a fixture edition is the standard for collectors of Islamic coins. at major shows since the 1980's. Paul is a life Mr. Album is currently a senior fellow at the member of the American Numismatic Association Worcester College, Oxford, England, and in this and is a member of other organizations. He has been position has authored three of the ten volumes of the a contributing editor for the Standard Catalog of Sylloge of Islamic Coins in the Ashmolean (Museum) World Coins since 1998. Paul brings experience in beginning in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (S.933)
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (S.933) SEPTEMBER 7, 1989 Mr. President: I speak today to urge Senate passage of S.933, The Americans with Disabilities Act. It was a long time in coming and many -- on both sides of the aisle -- have worked long and hard to get us here today. S. 933 is the product of bipartisan effort at each and every stage of its inception. The origin of the Americans with Disabilities Act is rooted in an initiative of the National Council on Disability, an independent federal entity c~prised of 15 members appointed by President Reagan and charged with reviewing all laws, programs, and policies of the Federal Government affecting individuals with disabilities, and making recommendations as appropriate to the President and Congress. In 1986, the Council issued a report which found that the major obstacles facing people with disabilities were not the disability characteristic of the person but rather those which arose from barriers imposed externally. The Report recommended that Congress "enact a comprehensive law requiring equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities, with broad coverage and setting clear, consistent, and enforceable standards prohibiting discrimination on the basis of handicap." Page 1 of 130 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu During the last Congress, my Republican colleague, Senator Lowell Weicker introduced a bill developed by the National Council, titled "The Americans with Disabilities Act." Although this bill was not considered by the Senate, it initiated a dialogue and became the basis for the current revised bill introduced by Senators Harkin, Kennedy and Durenberger earlier this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Together Articulates a Number of Proposals That Can Help the Region Exploit Its Huge Untapped Potential for Regional Economic Integration
    i Photo by Warren Field ii FOREWORD For the global economy, these are difficult times. The world is emerging from a crisis whose aftershocks continue to resonate – trapping some of the richest economies in recession and shaking the foundations of one of the world’s major currencies. Here at ESCAP, there are historical echoes. What is now the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific was founded more than 60 years ago – also in the aftermath of a global crisis. The countries of Asia and the Pacific established their new Commission partly to assist them in rebuilding their economies as they came out of the yoke of colonialism and the Second World War. The newly established ECAFE, as ESCAP was called then, held a ministerial conference on regional economic cooperation in 1963 that resolved to set up the Asian Development Bank with the aim of assisting the countries in the region in rebuilding their economies. Fifty years later, the Asia-Pacific region is again at a crossroads, on this occasion seeking ways and means to sustain its dynamism in a dramatically changed global context in the aftermath of a global financial and economic crisis. An important change is the fact that, burdened by huge debts and global imbalances, the advanced economies of the West are no longer able to play the role of engines of growth for the Asia-Pacific region that they played in the past. Hence, the Asia-Pacific region has to look for new engines of growth. The secretariat of ESCAP has argued over the past few years that regional developmental challenges, such as poverty and wide disparities in social and physical infrastructure, can be turned into opportunities for sustaining growth in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Minnesota Minutes
    Year 1958-59 No. 10 UNIVERSITYOF MINNESOTA BOARD OF REGENTS MINUTES February 13,1959 A meeting of the Board of Regents was held in the Regents' Room, Administration Building, on Friday, February 13, 1959, at 10 o'clock. Present: Chairman Quinlivan, presiding; Regents Griggs, Howard, Malkerson, Neumeier, Olson, Skyberg, and President Morrill. Voted to approve the minutes of the following meetings : Board of Regents of September 19-20, 1958 Board of Regents of October 3, 1958 Board of Regents of October 11, 1958 Board of Regents of October 18, 1958 Board of Regents of November 7-8, 1958 Board of Regents of November 15, 1958 Board of Regents of December 12, 1958 Voted to approve the following amendment to the minutes : July 2, 1958, Margery S Low Instructor School of Nursin continuation of appointment as Assistant Professor Seoul ~ationj University of Korea Cooperative Project July 1, 1958 to February 28, 1959 at the rate of $7,500 plus 25% overseas differential Term A to read July 1, 1958 to February 10, 1959 (returned early from Korean service) Voted to approve the following personnel changes: Retirements Henry G Zavoral as Professor Emeritus Extension Animal Husbandman Agricultural Extension Service to retire on Federal Retirement effective March 3, 1959 Carl F Schlotthauer as Professor Emeritus of Veterinary Medicine Experimental Medicine Mayo Foundation effective De- cember 31, 1958 William B Crickmer Building Caretaker Physical Plant to retire on Old Age and Survivors Insurance effective December 31, QXR A"-"1 Hulda M Olson Food Service
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
    Monday, December 22, 2003 Part LII Federal Communications Commission Semiannual Regulatory Agenda VerDate dec<05>2003 15:43 Dec 16, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 D:\UNIFIED\PRESSD~1\FALL20~1\UA031052.TXT apps41 PsN: UA031052 73884 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2003 / Unified Agenda FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS To help keep the public informed of comment period is specified during COMMISSION significant rulemaking proceedings, the which all interested parties may submit Commission has prepared a list of comments. 47 CFR Ch. I important proceedings now in progress. The General Services Administration Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory publishes the Unified Agenda in the (NPRM) — issued by the Commission and Deregulatory Actions#173;Spring Federal Register in the spring and fall when it is proposing a specific change 2003 of each year. to Commission rules and regulations. AGENCY Before any changes are actually made, : Federal Communications The following terms may be helpful in Commission. understanding the status of the interested parties may submit written ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda. proceedings included in this report: comments on the proposed revisions. Docket Number — assigned to a Further Notice of Proposed SUMMARY: Twice a year, in spring and proceeding if the Commission has Rulemaking (FNPRM) —issued by the fall, the Commission publishes in the issued either a Notice of Proposed Commission when additional comment Federal Register a list in the Unified Rulemaking or a Notice of Inquiry in the proceeding is sought. Agenda of those major items and other concerning the matter under significant proceedings under consideration.
    [Show full text]