DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, GALECRON 4 EC INSECTICIDE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, GALECRON 4 EC INSECTICIDE ( ") . ~------"-~---- -~-~------~----,4E Insecticide-Ovicide For control of certain Active Ingredients: Galecron 4E contains 4 Ibs. insects Oil cotton Chlordimeform: N"-( 4-chloro­ chlordimeform per gallon a-tolyl)-N.N-dimethyl- NOTE: This J:.roducl has been formamidine ......... 48.5% Keep Out of Reach of shown to cause cancer in labora­ Children. tory animals. The user must rC3d Xylene range aromatic and lollow all precautlQnary slate­ solvent .............. 43.4% ments and instructions lor use. WARNING Iner~!ngredients: 8.1% See additional precautionary Total: 100.0% statements left of container seam Five Gallons EPA Reg. No. 100-551 u.s. Standard Measure Control No. 52100 EPA Est. 100-AL-1 See directions for use on panel at right. elBA-GEIGY. A C' ,'" 'j '", ,; ;-rJ • ~". ~." " Tl "'-' . FEB 1 1 1986 ,.' .' Ii ,t. l .. ~",):~Ol J CG"- nO·'j.7sG l'f<A " • .;::~_,-,il",;i:_'::...:...~.J_ Galecron' 4E DIRECTIONS FOR USE AND CONDITIONS OF SALE Galecron 4E + Tank Mixtures: Add % of the required AND WARRANTY amount of water to the spray tank. With the agitator running if possible, add the desired amount of the IMPORTANT. Read the entire Direcllons for Use and other products recommended on this label. Then add the Conditions of Sale and Warranty before using the desired amount of Galecron 4E. Continue agitation this product. while adding the remainder of water. Note: Do not let spray m;xture stand overnight in the Conditions of Sale and Warranty spray tank. Rinse spray tank at the end of the day. The Dlrecllons for Use of this product reflect the To avoid spray drift, do not apply under windy condi­ opinion of experts based on field use and tests. The tions. Avoid spray overlap, as crop injury may result. directions are believed to be reliable and should be followed carefully. However, it is impossible to elimi­ DIRECTIONS FOR USE nate all risks inherently associated with use of this product. Crop injury, ineffectiveness, or other unin­ It is a violation of federal law to use this product in a tended consequences may result because ')f such manner inconsistent with its labeling. factors as weather conditions, wesence of other materials, or the manner of use or application all of FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS FOR USE which are beyond the control of CIBA-GEIGY or the AND PRECAUTIONS ON THIS LABEL MAY RESULT Seller. All such risks shall be assumed by the Buyer. IN CROP INJURY, POOR INSECT CONTROL, AND/OR ILLEGAL RESIDUES. CIBA-GEIGY warrants that this product conforms to the chemical description on the label and is reasonably Cotton fit for the purposes raferred to in the Directions for Apply the specified rate below in water in a minimum.;:>f Use subject to the inherent risks referred to above. 1 gal. of spray mixture per acre with ground or aertal CIBA-GEIGY makes no other express or application equipment using tow drtft nozzles. Apply on a 3-5 day schedule when moth flights begin and/or implied warranty of Fitness or Merchant­ when eggs appear. Continue applications as long as ability or any other express or implied egg laying occurs. Apply the lower rate when Insect warranty. In no case shall CIBA-GEIGY populations are low or egg depOSition IS Just starting. or the Seller be liable for consequential, If larvae reach economic levels, use a tank mix as special, or indirect damages resulting described below. from the use or handling of this product. Note: Do not apply just before a rain or poor control CIBA-GEIGY and the Seller offer this product, and the may result. Buyer and user accept it, subject to the foregoing Conditions of Sale and Warranty, which may be Galecron 4E Alone (All cotton growing states except varied only by agreement in writing signed by a duly CA and AZ) authorized representative of CIBA-GEIGY. Bollworm: Y.-¥2 pt./ A Tobacco budworm: ¥2 pt.l A General Information Galecron 4E + Tank Mixtures (All cotton growing Galecron 4E is an insecticide and ovicide. states) Galecron 4E acts primarily as an ovicide for control of Galecron 4E acts primarily as an ovicide for the control bollworm and/or tobacco budworm on cotton. Best of bollworm and tobacco budworm on cotton. Best results can be expected in fields under a regular scout­ results can be expected from fields under Pest Man­ ing program. In some cases it may be a(i',antageous agement /Scouting programs. to apply Galecron 4E in a tank mix with other insecti­ Galecron 4E used alolle will have little or no effect on cides; for example, when egg hatch occurs because bo;1 weevil (cotton) or on predators, beneficial insects, of delayed application or other causes, o~ when It IS and bees. necessary to begin application in a tiel a'where boll­ Mixing Instructions worm/tobacco budworm larvae or other insect ~MI~ : listed on the other product labels haile' Prepare no more spray mixture than is needed for the Jsached'~co:: nomic levels. Use the above rates of Galecroh , immediate operation. Thoroughly clean spray equip· II~ per acre except in CA and AZ where:Ih,e pt. ment before using this product. Agitate thoroughly 1'2 r~t.e I~ recommended. Mix Galecr?n 4E w:tti .ather before and during application. Good bypass agitation 1n~6?:. ticides recommended on thiS label according to the is suffiCient to keep Galecron 4E in emulsion. above mixing directions. Apply tank mixes immedi.a.t?!~ • Galecron 4E Alone: Add 2/3 of the required amount of after mixing. •• water to the spray tank with the agitator running, then add the desired amount of Galecron 4E. Continue "'". ., agitation while adding the remainder of the water. : ! - / Galecron· 4E Galecron 4E has been found to be effective and com­ Special Precautions to Prevent Exposure .oatible·in tank mixture with the listed products. When using Galecron 4E in tank mixture, observe alilimita­ Wear minimum protective clothing when wor~,"g in tions, precautions, and rate recommendations which the loading area. Wear special protective clotning as appear on the labels for these products. Under condi­ indicated below to ensure against possible expo­ tions of low to moderate bollworml budworm infesta­ sure dUI ing all operations associated with handling, tion levels and in closely scouted and supervised mixing, and application. fields, the pyrethroid products may be tank mixed at the lowest labeled rate. Minimum Protective Clothing and Equipment: Heavy-duty, long-sleeve, one-piece work suit; cloth Ambush" Dimethoate Methyl parathion cap; underwear including T-type undershirt; heavy­ Ammo" Dimilin" Methyl parathion duty fabric, rubber or neoprene-type gloves; socks; Azodrin® Elcar" + toxaphene heavy-duty work boots (waterproofed), and goggles or Baedlus EPN + Methyl Ortnene~ face shield. thuringiensis parathion Pay-Off" • Wear clean clothes each day and launder before Bolstar" Guthion® Pounce:5; reusing. Place contaminated clothing in a specially Bidrin® Imidan® Pydrin" designated container until laundering. Curacron" Lorsban~' Supracide" • Keep a complete clean change 01 clothes at the work Cymbush® Methomyl site for use if needed. Notes: To avoid illegal residues, (1) Do not apply within • Replace boots and gloves if contaminated. 21 days of picking. (2) Do not feed foliage from treated cotton plants or gin trash to livestock. (3) Do not allow Special Protective Clothing and Equipment livestock to graze treated areas. • Wear rubber boots (slip-on, knee-length, waterproof) Yield Enhancement (All Cotton Growing Areas) and heavy-duty rubber or neoprene gloves when Applications of Galecron at 5-7 day intervals have handling Galecron 4E during wet conditions, for lim­ resulted in cotton vie Ids above that expected from ited cleaning or adjustment of equipment, in the case insect control. For a yield enhancement effect, apply of a minor sp:lI, or when otherwise appropriate for Galecron 4E at %-'/2 pt.lA 4-6 times beginning at first added protection. pin head square formation (5-7 true leaf stage). • Wear a complete waterproof rubberized or plastic Note: Yield increase may not occur if plants are under rain suit with head covering when cleaning or han­ stress during treatment. Applications may be com­ dling application equipment or when in the operation bined with other insecticides as needed. area, in the case of a spill or accident, or when otherwise app, opriate for maximum protection. Storage and Disposal • Wear an approved pesticide respirator, such as Willson 1200 facepiece equipped with Willson R-21 Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or cartridges and R-15 filters, during application of disposal. Open dumping is prohibited. Galecron 4E, during cleanup operations, in the event Storage-Do not store at temperatures below 32°F, of spills or accidents, or when otherwise exposed to since crystals may form. If allowed to freeze, place in a vapors or spray mist. Clean mask after each use and ( warm room (50-80° F) and roll and shake the container change cartridges and filters daily not tt> exceed frequently for several days until crystals are dissolved. 8 hours of use, or if breathing becomes difficu:t. Pesticide Disposal-Pesticide wastes may be acutely • Clean all protective clothing and equipment before toxic. Improper disposal of unused pesticide, spray reuse. mixture, or rinse water is a violation of federal law. If these wastes cannot be used according to label Personal Precautions instructions, contact your State Pesticide or Environ­ • If Galecron 4E concentrate or sprav iets 00 clothing, fTIental Control Agency, or the Hazardous Waste repre­ remove contaminated clothing i"l'1leqiately:a~fl': sentative at the nearest EPA Regional Office for wash affected parts of body with sct'3P.ilJld water. ff • guidance in proper disposal methods. there is any question as to the extent ot contamiroJ": Container Disposal-Do not reuse this container.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances
    COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances revised 2/4/2021 IARC list 1 are Carcinogenic to humans list compiled by Hector Acuna, UCSB IARC list Group 2A Probably carcinogenic to humans IARC list Group 2B Possibly carcinogenic to humans If any of the chemicals listed below are used in your research then complete a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the product as described in the Chemical Hygiene Plan. Prop 65 known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity Material(s) not on the list does not preclude one from completing an SOP. Other extremely toxic chemicals KNOWN Carcinogens from National Toxicology Program (NTP) or other high hazards will require the development of an SOP. Red= added in 2020 or status change Reasonably Anticipated NTP EPA Haz list COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances CAS Source from where the material is listed. 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide Acutely Toxic Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- Acutely Toxic 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea (Methyl-CCNU) Prop 65 KNOWN Carcinogens NTP 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) IARC list Group 2A Reasonably Anticipated NTP 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) (Lomustine) Prop 65 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea Acutely Toxic 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane IARC list Group 2B 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Prop 65 IARC list Group 2B 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p -chloropheny)ethylene (DDE) Prop 65 1,1-Dichloroethane
    [Show full text]
  • Imidacloprid Does Not Enhance Growth and Yield of Muskmelon In
    HORTSCIENCE 30(5):997–999. 1995. plant growth and yield responses of muskmel- ons to imidacloprid in the presence and ab- Imidacloprid Does Not Enhance sence of whiteflies. Growth and Yield of Muskmelon in the Materials and Methods Greenhouse studies. All plants used in the Absence of Whitefly greenhouse tests were direct-seeded ‘Topmark’ muskmelons in a 3 soil : 3 perlite : 1 peat J.C. Palumbo and C.A. Sanchez mixture in 1.5-liter pots. Each pot contained 500 g of soil mixture and was planted with four University of Arizona, Yuma Valley Agricultural Center, 6425 West 8th Street, to five seeds. Seedlings were grown during Yuma, AZ 85364 Mar. and Apr. 1994 in a glasshouse under natural light with adequate water and nutrients Additional index words. Bemisia tabaci, Bemisia argentifolii, Cucumis melo, relative growth for maximum growth. Upon emergence, seed- rate, net assimilation rate ling plants were thinned to one per pot. Pots Abstract. Imidacloprid is a new, chloronicotinyl insecticide currently being used to control were then placed in wooden-frame exclusion × × sweetpotato whitefly [Bemisia tabaci Genn, also known as silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia cages (1.7 m width 1.2 m long 0.6 m high) argentifolii Bellows and Perring)]. Large growth and yield increases of muskmelon screened with fine organdy cloth to exclude (Cucumis melo L.) following the use of imidacloprid have caused some to speculate that this whitefly adults and other insects. The cages ± compound may enhance growth and yield above that expected from insect control alone. were maintained in the glasshouse at 28 4C. Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to evaluate the growth and yield response of Whitefly adults used in these studies were melons to imidacloprid in the presence and absence of whitefly pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibited and Restricted Pesticides List Fair Trade USA® Agricultural Production Standard Version 1.1.0
    Version 1.1.0 Prohibited and Restricted Pesticides List Fair Trade USA® Agricultural Production Standard Version 1.1.0 Introduction Through the implementation of our standards, Fair Trade USA aims to promote sustainable livelihoods and safe working conditions, protection of the environment, and strong, transparent supply chains.. Our standards work to limit negative impacts on communities and the environment. All pesticides can be potentially hazardous to human health and the environment, both on the farm and in the community. They can negatively affect the long-term sustainability of agricultural livelihoods. The Fair Trade USA Agricultural Production Standard (APS) seeks to minimize these risks from pesticides by restricting the use of highly hazardous pesticides and enhancing the implementation of risk mitigation practices for lower risk pesticides. This approach allows greater flexibility for producers, while balancing controls on impacts to human and environmental health. This document lists the pesticides that are prohibited or restricted in the production of Fair Trade CertifiedTM products, as required in Objective 4.4.2 of the APS. It also includes additional rules for the use of restricted pesticides. Purpose The purpose of this document is to outline the rules which prohibit or restrict the use of hazardous pesticides in the production of Fair Trade Certified agricultural products. Scope • The Prohibited and Restricted Pesticides List (PRPL) applies to all crops certified against the Fair Trade USA Agricultural Production Standard (APS). • Restrictions outlined in this list apply to active ingredients in any pesticide used by parties included in the scope of the Certificate while handling Fair Trade Certified products.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Toxaphene
    TOXAPHENE 199 9. REFERENCES ACGIH. 2009. Chlorinated camphene. In: 2009 TLVs and BEIs: Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Adams RS. 1967. The fate of pesticide residue in soil. J Minn Acad Sci 34:44-48. Adinolfi M. 1985. The development of the human blood-CSF-brain barrier. Dev Med Child Neurol 27(4):532-537. Adlercreutz H. 1995. Phytoestrogens: Epidemiology and a possible role in cancer protection. Environ Health Perspect Suppl 103(7):103-112. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1989. Decision guide for identifying substance- specific data needs related to toxicological profiles; Notice. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Division of Toxicology. Fed Regist 54(174):37618-37634. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1990. Biomarkers of organ damage or dysfunction for the renal, hepatobiliary, and immune systems. Subcommittee on Biomarkers of Organ Damage and Dysfunction. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2005. Health consultation. Organic chemical residue in schoolyard soils, Goodyear and Burroughs-Mollette Elementary Schools and Risley Middle School and Edo-Miller Park/Lanier Field, city of Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/pha/OrganicChemicalResidueInSchoolyardSoils/BWKSchoolHCFinal020 905.pdf. June 3, 2010. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2009. Health consultation. Technical support document for a toxaphene reference dose (RfD) as a basis for fish consumption screening values (FCSVs). State of Michigan. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. AIHA. 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Residues : Maximum Residue Limits
    THAI AGRICULTURAL STANDARD TAS 9002-2013 PESTICIDE RESIDUES : MAXIMUM RESIDUE LIMITS National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives ICS 67.040 ISBN UNOFFICAL TRANSLATION THAI AGRICULTURAL STANDARD TAS 9002-2013 PESTICIDE RESIDUES : MAXIMUM RESIDUE LIMITS National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives 50 Phaholyothin Road, Ladyao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900 Telephone (662) 561 2277 Fascimile: (662) 561 3357 www.acfs.go.th Published in the Royal Gazette, Announcement and General Publication Volume 131, Special Section 32ง (Ngo), Dated 13 February B.E. 2557 (2014) (2) Technical Committee on the Elaboration of the Thai Agricultural Standard on Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticide 1. Mrs. Manthana Milne Chairperson Department of Agriculture 2. Mrs. Thanida Harintharanon Member Department of Livestock Development 3. Mrs. Kanokporn Atisook Member Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health 4. Mrs. Chuensuke Methakulawat Member Office of the Consumer Protection Board, The Prime Minister’s Office 5. Ms. Warunee Sensupa Member Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Public Health 6. Mr. Thammanoon Kaewkhongkha Member Office of Agricultural Regulation, Department of Agriculture 7. Mr. Pisan Pongsapitch Member National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards 8. Ms. Wipa Thangnipon Member Office of Agricultural Production Science Research and Development, Department of Agriculture 9. Ms. Pojjanee Paniangvait Member Board of Trade of Thailand 10. Mr. Charoen Kaowsuksai Member Food Processing Industry Club, Federation of Thai Industries 11. Ms. Natchaya Chumsawat Member Thai Agro Business Association 12. Mr. Sinchai Swasdichai Member Thai Crop Protection Association 13. Mrs. Nuansri Tayaputch Member Expert on Method of Analysis 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Method Description
    Methods for Elements Method Method Description Analyte Calcium Copper Iron Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Magnesium EAM 4.4 Spectrometric Determination of Elements in Phosphorus Food Using Microwave Assisted Digestion Potassium Sodium Strontium Zinc Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Lead Spectrometric Determination of Arsenic, Manganese EAM 4.7 Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury and Mercury Other Elements in Food Using Microwave Molybdenum Assisted Digestion Nickel Selenium Uranium Vanadium Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Method for Analysis of Bottled water for 18 Iron EAM 4.12 Elements by ICPMS Lead Manganese Mercury Nickel Selenium Thallium Uranium Zinc High Performance Liquid Chromatography- Inorganic arsenic, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Dimethylarsinic acid (DMA), EAM 4.10 Spectrometric Determination of Four Arsenic Monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), Species in Fruit Juice Arsenobetaine (AsB) KAN-LAB-MET.95 Determination of Iodine in Foods Iodine Methods for Radionuclides Method Method Description Analyte Determination of Strontium-90 in Foods by WEAC.RN.METHOD.2.0 Strontium-90 Internal Gas-Flow Proportional Counting Americium-241 Cesium-134 Cesium-137 Determination of Gamma-Ray Emitting Cobalt-60 WEAC.RN.METHOD.3.0 Radionuclides in Foods by High-Purity Potassium-40 Germanium Spectrometry Radium-226 Ruthenium-103 Ruthenium-106 Thorium-232 Methods for Pesticides/Industrial Chemicals Method Method Description Analyte Extraction Method: Analysis of Pesticides KAN-LAB-PES.53 and
    [Show full text]
  • PAN International List of Highly Hazardous Pesticides
    PAN International List of Highly Hazardous Pesticides (PAN List of HHPs) December 2016 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Pesticide Action Network International Impressum © PAN International c/o PAN Germany, Nernstweg 32, 22765 Hamburg, Germany December, 2016 This 'PAN International List of Highly Hazardous Pesticides' was initially drafted by PAN Germany for PAN International. The 1st version was adopted by PAN International 2008 and published January 2009. Since then the list has been updated several times as classifications changed for numerous individual pesticides. In 2013/2014 the PAN International Working Group on “HHP criteria” revised the criteria used in this list to identify highly hazardous pesticides. This December 2016 version of the list is based on these hazard criteria adopted by PAN International in June 2014. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Contents Background and introduction ................................................................................................. 4 About this List ........................................................................................................................ 8 What is new in this List ........................................................................................................ 10 Work in progress ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature
    APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature Explanation of OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data Studies located and coded into ECOTOX must meet acceptability criteria, as established in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Studies that do not meet these criteria are designated in the bibliography as “Accepted for ECOTOX but not OPP.” The intent of the acceptability criteria is to ensure data quality and verifiability. The criteria parallel criteria used in evaluating registrant-submitted studies. Specific criteria are listed below, along with the corresponding rejection code. · The paper does not report toxicology information for a chemical of concern to OPP; (Rejection Code: NO COC) • The article is not published in English language; (Rejection Code: NO FOREIGN) • The study is not presented as a full article. Abstracts will not be considered; (Rejection Code: NO ABSTRACT) • The paper is not publicly available document; (Rejection Code: NO NOT PUBLIC (typically not used, as any paper acquired from the ECOTOX holding or through the literature search is considered public) • The paper is not the primary source of the data; (Rejection Code: NO REVIEW) • The paper does not report that treatment(s) were compared to an acceptable control; (Rejection Code: NO CONTROL) • The paper does not report an explicit duration of exposure; (Rejection Code: NO DURATION) • The paper does not report a concurrent environmental chemical concentration/dose or application rate; (Rejection Code: NO CONC) • The paper does not report the location of the study (e.g., laboratory vs.
    [Show full text]
  • SUGGESTIONS Jtj 10M
    1975 AY 2 0 l' 08 SUGGESTIONS JtJ 10M... for controlling Cotton Insects in the High Plains, Rolling Plains and Trans-Pecos Areas of Texas TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM JOHN E. HUTCHISON, DIRECTOR, COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Suggestions for Controlling Cotton Insects In the High Plains, Rolling Plains and Trans-Pecos Areas of Texas Suggestions in this publication are based on results of continuing research conducted throughout the state by the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Research results from other cotton producing states for some of the minor cotton pests have been evaluated carefully and utilized in devel­ oping these suggestions. A committee of state and federal re­ search personnel and specialists of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service meets annually to review research results and to develop suggestions for the safest, most profitable insect control practices for Texas producers. At least 12 insect and mite species attacking Texas cotton show some resistance to once-effective chemicals. Evidence indicates that the more extensively a material is used, the more rapidly resistance develops. Therefore, use of insecticides should be restricted to actual need, based on field inspections. For information on identification of major cotton insects, their life history and the kind of damage they cause, see Cotton Insects (B-933, Texas Agricultural Extension Service). INSECT CONTROL PROGRAM Precise timing and execution of each production operation is extremely important in reducing insect injury and maximizing profits. In planning an insect control program, the cotton pro­ ducer should consider effective use of both natural and cultural control.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardner-Webb University Chemical Hygiene Plan Contents
    Gardner‐Webb University Chemical Hygiene Plan Date Issued: Prepared by: Venita Totten, Ph.D. Department of Natural Sciences Approved By: David Wacaster, Director Environmental & Occupational Safety Approved By: Gardner-Webb University Chemical Hygiene Plan Contents Introduction Definitions Scope and Applications Responsibilities Safe Laboratory Practices Good Laboratory Practices Guidelines for Chemical Use in Teaching Laboratories Food, Beverages & Chemical/Biological Contamination Housekeeping Glassware Personal Protective Equipment Warning Signs/MSDS Unattended Operations Working Alone Hazardous Waste Management Guidelines Hazardous Material Handling and Storage General Guidelines Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals Procurement Transport Chemical Storage Labeling Inventory Control Compressed Gases Controlling Specific Chemical Hazards and Exposures Corrosives Flammable and Combustible Liquids Carcinogens, Reproductive Toxins, and Acutely Toxic Chemicals Controlling Potential Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals Inhalation Hazards Skin/Eye Contact Hazards Ingestion Hazards Injection Hazards Chemical Hygiene Plan Page 2 Gardner-Webb University Chemical Hygiene Plan Personal Safety Major Hazard Emergencies Minor Hazard Emergencies Chemical Spills Fume Hoods and Other Engineering Controls Biological Safety Training and Information Medical Consultation Planning for Emergencies Appendices Appendix A Laboratory Standard Appendix B List of Acutely Toxic Chemicals Appendix C List of Select and Suspected Carcinogens Appendix D List of Reproductive Hazards Appendix E P-Listed Chemicals Appendix F Chemical Use Planning Form Appendix G Hazard Assessment & PPE Chemical Hygiene Plan Page 3 Gardner-Webb University Chemical Hygiene Plan Introduction and Purpose The Department of Natural Sciences at Gardner-Webb University has developed this Chemical Hygiene Plan to define work practices and procedures to help ensure that all personnel are protected from health and safety hazards associated with the chemicals with which they work.
    [Show full text]
  • 57518 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 6, 1996 / Rules and Regulations
    57518 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 6, 1996 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION implement certain pollution prevention, (BPT), §§ 455.43 and 455.63 (BCT), and AGENCY recycle and reuse practices. Facilities §§ 455.44 and 455.64 (BAT) are choosing and implementing the established in the National Pollutant 40 CFR Part 455 pollution prevention alternative will Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) receive a discharge allowance. permits. [FRL±5630±9] The final rule will benefit the ADDRESSES: For additional technical RIN 2040±AC21 environment by removing toxic information write to Ms. Shari H. pollutants (pesticide active ingredients Zuskin, Engineering & Analysis Division Pesticide Chemicals Category, and priority pollutants) from water (4303), U.S. EPA, 401 M Street SW, Formulating, Packaging and discharges that have adverse effects on Washington, D.C. 20460 or send e-mail Repackaging Effluent Limitations human health and aquatic life. EPA has to: [email protected] or call Guidelines, Pretreatment Standards, estimated the compliance costs and at (202) 260±7130. For additional and New Source Performance economic impacts expected to result economic information contact Dr. Lynne Standards from the Zero Discharge/Pollution Tudor at the address above or by calling Prevention Alternative (i.e., Zero/P2 AGENCY: Environmental Protection (202) 260±5834. Agency. Alternative). The Agency has determined that the Zero/P2 Alternative The complete record (excluding ACTION: Final rule. will result in a similar removal of toxic confidential business information) for this rulemaking is available for review SUMMARY: This final regulation limits pound equivalents per year at EPA's Water Docket; 401 M Street, the discharge of pollutants into (approximately 7.6 million toxic pound SW, Washington, DC 20460.
    [Show full text]