DOCSLIB.ORG

The CTA in Motion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The CTA in Motion The CTA In Motion 2001 Annual Budget Departmental Detail and 2001-2005 Capital Plan Chicago Transit Authority Proposed he Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada T(GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the Chicago Transit Authority, Illinois for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2000. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communication device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to January 1, 2000 conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. LN200026H CCHHIICCAAGGOO TTRRAANNSSIITT AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET DEPARTMENT DETAIL & 2001-2005 CAPITAL PROGRAM Proposed October 2000 Merchandise Mart Plaza, P.O. Box 3555, Chicago, Illinois 60654 SUMMARY The purpose of this document is two-fold: to provide department budgetary detail and to delineate the five-year capital program. To best accomplish this task, this document is divided into four main sections. The first three sections comprise the three major reporting units of CTA. Each of these sections begins with a brief department description and is followed by the accompanying department detail, including both the 2001 budget by expense category and organizational chart. The final section, Capital Detail, is presented in two parts. The first section provides a description for each project in the 2001 – 2005 Capital Program and is followed by a forecast of expenditures for major projects or project groupings. 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET AND DEPARTMENT DETAIL TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary..................................................................................................................................................................................i INTRODUCTION Organization Chart ...................................................................................................................................................................O - 1 Total CTA Budget....................................................................................................................................................................O - 2 DEPARTMENT DETAIL EXECUTIVE Authority Governance...............................................................................................................................................................O - 5 Office of the President ..............................................................................................................................................................O - 7 Office of Inspector General .......................................................................................................................................................O - 9 General Counsel .......................................................................................................................................................................O - 11 TRANSIT OPERATIONS Department Descriptions ...........................................................................................................................................................O- 23 Transit Operations Total Budget................................................................................................................................................O- 25 EVP Transit Operations.............................................................................................................................................................O- 26 Customer Service .....................................................................................................................................................................O- 28 BUS OPERATIONS Bus Operations Total Budget.........................................................................................................................................O - 31 VP Bus Operations .......................................................................................................................................................O - 32 Bus Garages/STO .........................................................................................................................................................O - 34 Bus Heavy Maintenance ...............................................................................................................................................O - 38 Engineering & Technical Services - Bus ........................................................................................................................O - 40 RAIL OPERATIONS Rail Operations Total Budget ........................................................................................................................................O - 43 VP Rail Operations .......................................................................................................................................................O - 44 Rail Terminals/STO ......................................................................................................................................................O - 46 Rail Car Appearance .....................................................................................................................................................O - 50 Rail Heavy Maintenance ...............................................................................................................................................O - 52 Engineering & Technical Services - Rail ........................................................................................................................O - 54 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET AND DEPARTMENT DETAIL TABLE OF CONTENTS SAFETY, SECURITY, & TRAINING Safety, Security, & Training Total Budget ......................................................................................................................O - 57 VP Safety, Security, & Training .....................................................................................................................................O - 58 Security Services ..........................................................................................................................................................O - 60 System Safety & Environmental Affairs .........................................................................................................................O - 62 Communication/Power Control......................................................................................................................................O - 64 Training & Instruction...................................................................................................................................................O - 66 PLANNING Planning Total Budget .......................................................................................................................................................................................................O - 69 Sr. VP Planning ................................................................................................................................................................................................................O - 70 Planning ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................O - 72 Facility & ADA Planning ..............................................................................................................................................................................................O - 74 ADMINISTRATION & PARATRANSIT Administration & Paratransit Total Budget.....................................................................................................................O - 77 Administration & Paratransit .........................................................................................................................................O - 78 Operations Support Services..........................................................................................................................................O - 80 Paratransit Operations ...................................................................................................................................................O - 82 CONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING & FACILITIES Department Descriptions ...........................................................................................................................................................O - 85 Construction, Engineering & Facilities Tota l Budget...................................................................................................................O - 87 EVP Construction, Engineering, & Facilities ..............................................................................................................................O - 88 Real Estate ................................................................................................................................................................................O - 90 ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE Engineering , Construction & Maintenance Total Budget ................................................................................................O - 93 VP Engineering, Construction, & Maintenance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Station Tour October 20, 2002
    4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour October 20, 2002 Presented By: Chicago-L.org 4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour Guide Union Loop When the tour begins at Quincy station downtown, you will find yourself on the old Union Elevated Railroad, commonly known as "the Loop." The only man who could accomplish the difficult task of bringing a common downtown terminal to the Chicago elevated rapid transit system, which used to end at a separate terminal for each company, was Charles Tyson Yerkes. He had enough political deftness and power to convince store owners to sign consent forms allowing construction of the overhead structures on their streets (although alley routes were briefly contemplated). Though it was difficult — two segments had to be obtained under the names of existing "L" companies while for the two other legs, two companies, the Union Elevated Railroad and the Union Consolidated Elevated Railroad, had to be created — Yerkes managed to coordinate it all. As can be imagined from its piecemeal The construction of the Loop through downtown, seen here look- method of obtaining of leases, the Union Loop (referred ing west at Lake and Wabash circa 1894, was a major construction to simply as "the Loop" today) opened in pieces, starting project. In spite of the disruption, the project brought innumerous benefits to the central business district. (Photo from the Krambles- in 1895, with the Lake Street "L" making the first full Peterson Archive) circuit in 1897. North Side Main Line/Ravenswood Line After leaving the Loop through Tower 18 (at Lake & Wells), once the busiest railroad junction in the world, you will be on what is today the Brown (Ravenswood) Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project: Start of Stage a Construction
    Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project: Start of Stage A Construction Town Hall audience questions from March 2&4, 2021* meetings General questions Q. What does this project cost and how is it funded? A. The $2.1 billion RPM Phase One project is funded through a combination of federal and local funds including: $957 in federal Core Capacity funds (FTA); a federal $125 million Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) grant from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP); $622 million in Transit TIF (tax-increment financing) funds from the City of Chicago; and CTA financing. Q. Are updates and notices available in languages other than English? A. Yes. We regularly provide subtitled recordings of past community meetings in Chinese, Spanish and Vietnamese, as well as translated flyers distributed to local community organizations. Additionally, we offer live translation services for public meetings upon request. Q. When will the block-by-block meetings happen? A. They will be scheduled for April 2021. We will notify the public when the dates are finalized. Q. When will the project start? A. Stage A construction is expected to begin Spring 2021. Once construction schedules are finalized, we will notify the public in advance of important construction start dates. Station design/station and track construction Q. Why won’t you have temporary stations at Lawrence and Berwyn? A. There is not enough space available to build temporary stations at those locations, unfortunately. Passengers who normally board at Lawrence can use Wilson or Argyle stations, which are each a quarter mile away and connected via the #36 Broadway bus, and Berwyn customers can use the Bryn Mawr or Argyle stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Track Map [Pdf]
    Chicago Track Map Lehigh Ave To Waukegan & Kenosha, WI Wilmette To Antioch To Deerfield, Greyslake & Fox Lake Service Guide Amtrak to Milwaukee & All Points Northwest *27 *27 Glenview Greenleaf Ave *27 CTA Linden WILMETTE Green Bay Rd CTA Linden Yard Red Line Green Line Pink Line LAKE MICHIGAN Howard to 95th/Dan Ryan Harlem to Cottage Grove 54th/Cermak to Loop ‘L’ Glenayre Isabella All Times Weekdays: 4a to 12:50a Weekdays: 4a-1a GLENVIEW *27 Sat, Sun & Holidays: Sat, Sun & Holidays: 5a-1a Blue Line 5am to 12:50a O’Hare to Forest Park Harlem to Ashland/63rd Purple Line Central All Times Weekdays: 4:10a to 1:05a Linden to Howard Central St (Evanston) Sat, Sun & Holidays: Mon-Thu: 4:45a-1:30a Fri:4:50a-2:10a Brown Line 5:15a to 1:05a Sat: 5:30a-2:15a Sun & Holidays:6:30a-1:45a Kimball to Loop ‘L’ Linden to Loop ‘L’ Express Weekdays & Sat: 4a to 1a Orange Line Weekdays: 5:15a-9:15a, 2:25p-6:25p Golf Noyes Sun: 5a to 1a Midway to Loop ‘L’ Kimball to Belmont Weekdays: 3:30a-1:05a Yellow Line GOLF Weedays & Sat: 4a to 2a Harms Woods *26b Sat: 4a-1:05a Dempster-Skokie to Howard To Crystal Lake, McHenry & Harvard *26a Foster Holiday & Sun: 5a to 2a Green Bay Rd Sun & Holidays: 4:30a-1:05a Weekdays: 5a-11:15p Cumberland Sat, Sun & Holidays: 6:30a-11:15p East Northwest Hwy Emerson St Ave Benson Metra Lehigh Ave Davis Davis St Milwaukee Dist. North BNSF Railway Union Pacific Northwest (Evanston) Chicago Union Station to Fox Lake Chicago Union Station to Aurora Ogilvie T.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project Area
    TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION PROJECT AREA Purpose • Create a community-led vision for redevelopment in the neighborhood • Test specific concepts for CTA owned parcels • Expedite development post-construction Timing • Outgrowth of the community engagement process that began in 2009 • Planning Grant award from Federal Transit Administration • Coordination between transit project and development sites Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area Community Engagement 12 month process 22 stakeholder meetings including 3 open house meetings: • May 2017 – idea gathering • November 2017 – vision & goals; initial ideas • May 2018 – review of recommendations; next steps Aldermanic dialogue Website updates Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area TOD Planning Process TODAY Discovery Visioning Development Recommendations Implementation 2018 2020’s • Existing • Engagement • Concept • Public meeting • Select Conditions development developers • Vision • Final report • Market • Market testing • Zoning / Analysis • Principles and public review Goals • Engagement • Transit project • Construction coordination • Concept refinement • Aldermanic reviews Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area A Multi-Modal District Pedestrians • Enhanced pedestrian environment • Widened sidewalk on Hollywood Boulevard Transit • CTA Bryn Mawr, Berwyn, Argyle, and Lawrence stations • Increased transit service • #36, #81, #84,
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Ridership Report
    0 2012 Regional Ridership Report CONTENTS Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Regional Economic Outlook………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Regional Ridership Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………....11 CTA Ridership Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 Metra Ridership Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………32 Pace Ridership Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..40 Pace ADA Paratransit Ridership Results…………………………………………………………………………………..48 Fare History…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..49 1 2012 Regional Ridership Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides analysis of Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) system ridership over the five-year period between 2008 and 2012. This period was marked by a significant period of economic recession that began in 2008 and ended in mid-2009. Economic recovery since then has been modest and as of 2012, employment and job growth had yet to return to pre- recession levels. The recession negatively impacted transit operations on the RTA system and forced the Service Boards (CTA, Metra, and Pace) to consider fare increases and service cuts. CTA, Pace Suburban Service, and Pace ADA Paratransit implemented fare increases in 2009. Metra implemented fare adjustments in 2010 and a significant fare increase in 2012 to bring fares in line with inflationary cost increases. In addition, CTA and Pace both cut service in 2010, with CTA reducing service frequencies, shortening service hours, and eliminating nine express bus routes, and Pace eliminating $1.5 million worth of service. These fare increases and service cuts, together with significant job loss in the region, combined to produce negative ridership results on the RTA system in 2009 and 2010. After two years of ridership loss, the regional economy began to improve in 2011, along with ridership, and these positive trends continued into 2012. A complete history of Service Board fare increases from 2000 to 2012 is included in the final chapter of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • CTA: Managing Change
    CTA: Managing Change 2002 Annual Budget Department Detail and 2002-2006 Capital Plan Chicago Transit Authority he Government Finance Officers Association of the T United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the Chicago Transit Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2001. In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. This award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determining its eligibility for another award. LN2001033H CCHHIICCAAGGOO TTRRAANNSSIITT AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY 2002 ANNUAL BUDGET DEPARTMENT DETAIL & 2002-2006 CAPITAL PROGRAM Merchandise Mart Plaza, P.O. Box 3555, Chicago, Illinois 60654-0555 http://www.transitchicago.com SUMMARY The purpose of this document is two-fold: to provide department budgetary detail and to delineate the five-year capital program. To best accomplish this task, this document is divided into four main sections. The first three sections comprise the three major reporting units of CTA. Each of these sections begins with a brief department description and is followed by the accompanying department detail, including both the 2002 organizational chart and budget by expense category. The final section, Capital Detail, is presented in two parts. The first section provides a description for each project in the 2002 – 2006 Capital Program. This section is followed by a forecast of expenditures for major projects or project groupings.
    [Show full text]
  • Screen 1 Yellow Line AA Comments 111008
    Chicago Transit Authority Yellow Line Alternatives Analysis Study Screen One Public Involvement * Public Comments and Questions November 2008 No. Comment/Question Received Via* Topic Area(s) 1 How do you deal with pedestrians? STK 15 2 How do you coordinate with PACE? STK 11, 14 3 Do you brief surrounding communities? Ex. Morton Grove/Glenview STK 11 4 How do you deal with parking? STK 15 5 How many employees/residential STK 18 6 My concern is parking and getting from station via walking to my destination STK 15 7 Prefer rail to bus STK 7 One of the major economic development initiatives that my office is involved in is filling 3000 hotel rooms in our service region. A major draw is access to downtown Chicago. Visitors will take CTA & Metra to our areas (Evanston, Skokie, Glenview, Wilmette, Northbrook) But usually do not transfer to buses. They 8 would very much use expanded rail. STK 7 Switching modes of transportation would seem to a much less-preferred option. The assumption would be the rail line would continue north, making it a much more 9 viable option for those utilizing the system. STK 7 10 How will pedestrians bridge to major destinations such as the mall, Holocaust Museum, or the schools? STK 15 11 The estimated cost short term and long tern should be carefully elevated and considered. STK 12 12 What are the total costs for UP railway extension vs. bus option covering the next 20 years? STK 12 13 I prefer the heavy rail transit option using the UP railroad corridor NLU 5 14 For funding a heavy rail extension to Old Orchard why not put a 1 cent/gallon gas tax on all gasoline sold in Skokie for x number of years? NLU 12 15 Will there be Yellow line service on weekends with this extension (permanently) NLU 9 16 What about a subway extension running under Gross Point Road, Skokie Blvd, and Golf Rd to Old Orchard? NLU 5, 6, 7 17 Will the buses be hybrids like in NYC? NLU 7 I went through Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating the Benefits of TOD: the City of Evanston’S Transit-Oriented Redevelopment and the Hudson Bergen Light Rail Transit System
    Communicating the Benefits of TOD: The City of Evanston’s Transit-Oriented Redevelopment and the Hudson Bergen Light Rail Transit System Prepared for: Development, Community and Environment Division Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20460 Prepared by: Cali Gorewitz and Gloria Ohland Reconnecting America’s Center for Transit-Oriented Development Evanston Corridor Case Study Carrie Makarewicz, Albert Benedict, and ChaNell Marshall Center for Neighborhood Technology Hudson Bergen Light Rail Line Case Study Dr. Jan S. Wells and Martin Robins Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 2 THE CITY OF EVANSTON’S TRANSIT-ORIENTED REDEVELOPMENT ......... 3 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT..................................................................................... 3 The Players................................................................................................... 6 The Plans...................................................................................................... 7 Transit Investments....................................................................................... 8 MIXED-USE REDEVELOPMENT TAKES OFF IN EVANSTON ..................................... 10 Downtown Evanston Station Area............................................................... 12 Dempster Street Station Area ..................................................................... 14 Main Street Station
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr
    Red and Purple Modernization (RPM) Phase One Meet the Contractor Open House Walsh-Fluor Design-Build Team Lawrence to Bryn Mawr May 21-23, 2019 What is RPM? . Red and Purple Modernization (RPM) is a multi-phase program to rebuild all track structure and stations . 9.6-mile stretch of track structure that is about 100 years old + long-term ridership growth has resulted in overcrowding, less reliable service 2 What are the benefits? . Faster, smoother rides . Less crowding and more frequent service . Ability to add train service during rush periods, alleviating overcrowding on train . Modern, comfortable, fully ADA accessible stations 3 RPM Phase One 2018-2025 . Red-Purple Bypass: Construction of a rail bypass and track realignment to increase speed, reliability, and capacity . Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization: Reconstruction of four Red Line stations and six miles of track, associated structures and viaducts . Corridor Signal Improvements: New signal system covering 23 track miles, allowing for increased throughput of trains, more reliable train service 4 Why are we doing this? Bryn Mawr station Red Line viaduct, Winona Lawrence station Bryn Mawr station platform Red Line viaduct, Hollywood 5 Red Line Investments . $86M Red North Interim Station Improvement Project, 2012 (seven CTA stations) . Numerous track upgrades–slow zone reductions . Simply put: The time has come to rebuild this 100-year-old railroad Berwyn station, opened 1916 or 1917 6 RPM Utility Relocation Work: Update Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Area . We are currently doing advance utility relocation work . It is necessary to relocate utility lines and equipment to begin building new track structures .
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Annual Budget Summary
    PROPOSED 1999 Annual Budget Summary We deliver quality, affordable transit services that link people, jobs, and communities. Board of Directors Valerie B. Jarrett, Chairman Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Karen Dichiser Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago J.Douglas Donenfeld Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Don Jackson Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Susan A. Leonis Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Guadalupe A. Reyes Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Frank Kruesi President CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1999 PROPOSED BUDGET We deliver quality, affordable transit services Rebuilding that link people, jobs, and communities. Contents 1998 Operating Budget Performance 9 1999 Operating Budget 15 1999 Operating Budget 23 Department Data 2000 - 2001 Operating Financial Plan 31 1999 - 2003 Capital Improvement 37 Plan & Program Appendices 47 1 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT: I joined the CTA a year ago this month. My very first day of work was the day that service cuts went into effect. My job was to go out and explain why they were necessary. It forced me to think quickly about the decisions and events that had caused the CTA to get off track. But more importantly, it made me focus on the future and the steps necessary to rebuild this agency, inside and out, into the successful, respected transit system that it had been and had the potential to be again. Although 1998 presented its share of challenges, ultimately it has been a very rewarding year. The CTA has made tremendous gains. Much of the credit belongs to the many dedicated and talented employees who have worked so hard this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Calendar Chicago Transit Authority
    2011 Historical Calendar Chicago Transit Authority Expanded Historical Notes for each month now featured at the back! This circa 1906 view looking north at the intersection of Halsted, Blue Island and Harrison shows two Halsted streetcars with crush loads of workers and shoppers. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 G New Year’s Day 2 G 3 A 4 B 5 C 6 D 7 E 8 F 9 F 10 G 11 A 12 B 13 C 14 D 15 E 16 E 17 F 18 G 19 A 20 B 21 C 22 D Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 23 D 24 E 25 F 26 G 27 A 28 B 29 C C D 2011 January 30 31 2010 December 2011 February ABCDEFG: S M T W T F S S M T W T F S CTA Operations 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 Division 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Group Days Off 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 t Alternate day off 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 if you work on this day 26 27 28 29 30 31 27 28 l Central offices closed Three generations of rapid transit cars that served the Lake Street ‘L’ are seen lined up in Hamlin Yard on June 19, 1964 – 1964-built “New Look” High-Performance cars 2011-2012 (left), 1915-vintage “Baldie” car 4145 (center), and open platform wooden car 3146 (right).
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL CALENDAR Added Historical Notes Follow Calendar
    2020 HISTORICAL CALENDAR Added historical notes follow calendar Chicago Transit Authority JANUARY 2020 After a snow in December 1951, CTA streetcar #4231 is making its way down Halsted to its terminus at 79th Street. Built in 1948 by the Pullman Company in Chicago, car #4231 was part of a fleet of 600 Presidents Conference Committee (PCC) cars ordered by Chicago Surface Lines (CSL) just before its incorporation into the Chicago Transit Authority. At 48 feet, these were the longest streetcars used in any city. Their comfortable riding experience, along with their characteristic humming sound and color scheme, earned them being nicknamed “Green Hornets” after a well-known radio show of the time. These cars operated on Chicago streets until the end of streetcar service, June 21, 1958. Car #4391, the sole survivor, is preserved at the Illinois Railway Museum in Union, IL. SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT ABCDEFG: December 2019 February 2020 C D E F CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Group Days Off 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 t Alternate day off if 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 you work on this day 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 l Central offices closed 1 New Year’s Day 2 3 4 F G A B C D E 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 E F G A B C D 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 D E F G A B C Martin Luther 19 20 King, Jr.
    [Show full text]