Skokie Swift, a Cooperative Venture of the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Skokie Swift, a Cooperative Venture of the U.S

CTA WELCOMES GREYHOUND Chicago Transit Authority welcomes Greyhound to the transportation hub at the Dempster station SKOKIE of the Skokie Swift, a cooperative venture of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Village of Skokie and CT A. 5? Now, Greyhound-bound travelers destined for northwestem locations in the United States may board buses at Dempster without riding to the SWIFT busy Loop area. Greyhounds coming into Chicago will stop at Dempster on the way to the Loop. The Greyhound ti cket offi ce is located at the CT A bus termi nal, 5001 Dempster Street, Skokt e. Adult fare 60¢ Office hours are 7 AM to 7: 15 PM, Monday through Saturday, and Noon to 7: 15 PM, Sunday. Ch i Id, Student* or Senior Citizen" 45¢ 9-3-69 (* with valid identification card) For Information CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY CT A - Call 664-7220 Greyhound Call 675-9210 TIMET ABL E NO. 16 SOUTHBOUND 5 MILES IN 6)12MINUTES NeJRTHBOUND Leaves Dempster Station Leaves Howard Station 5001 Dempster St., Skokie 1647 Howard St., Chicago MONDAY thru FRIDAY MONDAY thru FRIDAY 5.58 AM First Train 5.40 AM First Train 6.22 AM 6.10 AM· 8.45 AM Every 2Ji2to 7Ji2minutes 6.30 AM· 8.50 AM Every 2Ji2to 7Ji2minutes 8.55 AM· 3.25 PM 10, 25, 40, 55 minutes 9.00 AM· 3.30 PM 00, 15, 30, 45 minutes after the hour after the hour 3.35 PM· 4.15 PM Every 10 minutes 3.40 PM· 4.30 PM Every 10 minutes 4.22 PM· 6.45 PM Every 2Ji2to 7 minutes 4.37 PM. 6.52 PM Every 2Ji2to 7 minutes 6.55 PM· 9.25 PM 10, 25, 40, 55 minutes 7.00 PM-l0.00 PM 00, 15, 30, 45 minutes after the hour after the hour 9.45 PM 10.30 PM 10.15 PM 11.00 PM Last Train 10.46 PM Last Train SATURDAY ONLY SA TURDA Y ONLY 7.00 AM First Train 6.40 AM First Train 7.15 AM 6.56 AM 7.27 AM· 9.15 AM 03, 15, 27, 39,51 min- 7.11 AM utes after the hour 7.26 AM· 9.26 AM 02, 14, 26, 38, 50 min- 9.30 AM· 4.00 PM 00, 15, 30, 45 minutes utes after the hour after the hour 9.40 AM· 4.25 PM 10, 25, 40, 55 minutes 4.13 PM· 6.01 PM 01, 13,25, 37, 49 rnln- after the hour utes after the hour 4.37 PM· 6.25 PM 01, 13, 25, 37, 49 rnin- 6.15 PM· 7.15 PM Every 15 minutes ute s after the haur 7.30 PM·ll.DO PM On the hour and hclf- 6.40 PM haur 6.55 PM 11.00 PM Last Train 7.15 PM· 10.45 PM 15, 45 minutes after the hour 10.45 PM Last Train SUNDAY • ONLY WHEN BEARS PLAY FOOTBALL AT HOME Trains every 7Ji2minutes before game 11:30 AM • 1:00 PM and 3:30 PM· 5:00 PM after game. Skokie Swift does not otherwise operate on Sunday. It does not aperate New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, or Christmas. Skokie #97 bus is available between Howard and Dempster Stations around the clock every day. Rapid transit connections ocrc s s-the-p lotforrn at Howard to Loop, Englewood and Jackson Park via subway; to Evanston and Wilmette via "L," and to Loop via Evanston Express "L" (Monday. Friday rush periods). Bus connections to Dempster with No. 97 Skokie route south to downtown Skokie and north to Old Orchard, United bus to DesPlaines and Greyhound to Milwaukee and beyond. Connections at Howard with CTA, Evanston and United buses..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Station Tour October 20, 2002
4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour October 20, 2002 Presented By: Chicago-L.org 4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour Guide Union Loop When the tour begins at Quincy station downtown, you will find yourself on the old Union Elevated Railroad, commonly known as "the Loop." The only man who could accomplish the difficult task of bringing a common downtown terminal to the Chicago elevated rapid transit system, which used to end at a separate terminal for each company, was Charles Tyson Yerkes. He had enough political deftness and power to convince store owners to sign consent forms allowing construction of the overhead structures on their streets (although alley routes were briefly contemplated). Though it was difficult — two segments had to be obtained under the names of existing "L" companies while for the two other legs, two companies, the Union Elevated Railroad and the Union Consolidated Elevated Railroad, had to be created — Yerkes managed to coordinate it all. As can be imagined from its piecemeal The construction of the Loop through downtown, seen here look- method of obtaining of leases, the Union Loop (referred ing west at Lake and Wabash circa 1894, was a major construction to simply as "the Loop" today) opened in pieces, starting project. In spite of the disruption, the project brought innumerous benefits to the central business district. (Photo from the Krambles- in 1895, with the Lake Street "L" making the first full Peterson Archive) circuit in 1897. North Side Main Line/Ravenswood Line After leaving the Loop through Tower 18 (at Lake & Wells), once the busiest railroad junction in the world, you will be on what is today the Brown (Ravenswood) Line.
[Show full text]
Regional Ridership Report
0 2012 Regional Ridership Report CONTENTS Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Regional Economic Outlook………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Regional Ridership Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………....11 CTA Ridership Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 Metra Ridership Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………32 Pace Ridership Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..40 Pace ADA Paratransit Ridership Results…………………………………………………………………………………..48 Fare History…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..49 1 2012 Regional Ridership Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides analysis of Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) system ridership over the five-year period between 2008 and 2012. This period was marked by a significant period of economic recession that began in 2008 and ended in mid-2009. Economic recovery since then has been modest and as of 2012, employment and job growth had yet to return to pre- recession levels. The recession negatively impacted transit operations on the RTA system and forced the Service Boards (CTA, Metra, and Pace) to consider fare increases and service cuts. CTA, Pace Suburban Service, and Pace ADA Paratransit implemented fare increases in 2009. Metra implemented fare adjustments in 2010 and a significant fare increase in 2012 to bring fares in line with inflationary cost increases. In addition, CTA and Pace both cut service in 2010, with CTA reducing service frequencies, shortening service hours, and eliminating nine express bus routes, and Pace eliminating $1.5 million worth of service. These fare increases and service cuts, together with significant job loss in the region, combined to produce negative ridership results on the RTA system in 2009 and 2010. After two years of ridership loss, the regional economy began to improve in 2011, along with ridership, and these positive trends continued into 2012. A complete history of Service Board fare increases from 2000 to 2012 is included in the final chapter of this report.
[Show full text]
CTA: Managing Change
CTA: Managing Change 2002 Annual Budget Department Detail and 2002-2006 Capital Plan Chicago Transit Authority he Government Finance Officers Association of the T United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the Chicago Transit Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2001. In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. This award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determining its eligibility for another award. LN2001033H CCHHIICCAAGGOO TTRRAANNSSIITT AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY 2002 ANNUAL BUDGET DEPARTMENT DETAIL & 2002-2006 CAPITAL PROGRAM Merchandise Mart Plaza, P.O. Box 3555, Chicago, Illinois 60654-0555 http://www.transitchicago.com SUMMARY The purpose of this document is two-fold: to provide department budgetary detail and to delineate the five-year capital program. To best accomplish this task, this document is divided into four main sections. The first three sections comprise the three major reporting units of CTA. Each of these sections begins with a brief department description and is followed by the accompanying department detail, including both the 2002 organizational chart and budget by expense category. The final section, Capital Detail, is presented in two parts. The first section provides a description for each project in the 2002 – 2006 Capital Program. This section is followed by a forecast of expenditures for major projects or project groupings.
[Show full text]
Screen 1 Yellow Line AA Comments 111008
Chicago Transit Authority Yellow Line Alternatives Analysis Study Screen One Public Involvement * Public Comments and Questions November 2008 No. Comment/Question Received Via* Topic Area(s) 1 How do you deal with pedestrians? STK 15 2 How do you coordinate with PACE? STK 11, 14 3 Do you brief surrounding communities? Ex. Morton Grove/Glenview STK 11 4 How do you deal with parking? STK 15 5 How many employees/residential STK 18 6 My concern is parking and getting from station via walking to my destination STK 15 7 Prefer rail to bus STK 7 One of the major economic development initiatives that my office is involved in is filling 3000 hotel rooms in our service region. A major draw is access to downtown Chicago. Visitors will take CTA & Metra to our areas (Evanston, Skokie, Glenview, Wilmette, Northbrook) But usually do not transfer to buses. They 8 would very much use expanded rail. STK 7 Switching modes of transportation would seem to a much less-preferred option. The assumption would be the rail line would continue north, making it a much more 9 viable option for those utilizing the system. STK 7 10 How will pedestrians bridge to major destinations such as the mall, Holocaust Museum, or the schools? STK 15 11 The estimated cost short term and long tern should be carefully elevated and considered. STK 12 12 What are the total costs for UP railway extension vs. bus option covering the next 20 years? STK 12 13 I prefer the heavy rail transit option using the UP railroad corridor NLU 5 14 For funding a heavy rail extension to Old Orchard why not put a 1 cent/gallon gas tax on all gasoline sold in Skokie for x number of years? NLU 12 15 Will there be Yellow line service on weekends with this extension (permanently) NLU 9 16 What about a subway extension running under Gross Point Road, Skokie Blvd, and Golf Rd to Old Orchard? NLU 5, 6, 7 17 Will the buses be hybrids like in NYC? NLU 7 I went through Jr.
[Show full text]
Communicating the Benefits of TOD: the City of Evanston’S Transit-Oriented Redevelopment and the Hudson Bergen Light Rail Transit System
Communicating the Benefits of TOD: The City of Evanston’s Transit-Oriented Redevelopment and the Hudson Bergen Light Rail Transit System Prepared for: Development, Community and Environment Division Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20460 Prepared by: Cali Gorewitz and Gloria Ohland Reconnecting America’s Center for Transit-Oriented Development Evanston Corridor Case Study Carrie Makarewicz, Albert Benedict, and ChaNell Marshall Center for Neighborhood Technology Hudson Bergen Light Rail Line Case Study Dr. Jan S. Wells and Martin Robins Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 2 THE CITY OF EVANSTON’S TRANSIT-ORIENTED REDEVELOPMENT ......... 3 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT..................................................................................... 3 The Players................................................................................................... 6 The Plans...................................................................................................... 7 Transit Investments....................................................................................... 8 MIXED-USE REDEVELOPMENT TAKES OFF IN EVANSTON ..................................... 10 Downtown Evanston Station Area............................................................... 12 Dempster Street Station Area ..................................................................... 14 Main Street Station
[Show full text]
IATF REPORT, FALL 2012 Attachment 13 13. UIC Student Presentation on Elements of Inaccessible Stations
IATF REPORT, FALL 2012 Attachment 13 13. UIC Student Presentation on Elements of Inaccessible Stations CTA RAIL STATION ACCESSIBILITY SURVEY April 29, 2011 AGENDA Background of Rail Station Accessibility Survey Methodology Survey Elements Individual Rail Lines Miscellaneous Issues Comparison with Top IATF Stations by Region Student Goals and Learning 2 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO (UIC) Urban and Public Affairs (UPA) Junior and Senior Cohorts Consisting of Students from UIC’s UPA program 3 PURPOSE Learn the role of accessibility in CTA’s rail stations Survey CTA’s inaccessible rail stations Determine individual station compliance with current accessibility requirements Contribute findings to an online network for future CTA planning 4 ADA This July 26 will mark 21st anniversary of ADA As of January 2011, 91 of 144 CTA rail stations accessible to wheelchairs by either elevator or ADA-compliant ramp 5 TRAINING AND MENTORING Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 – Mayor’s Office for People with Disabilities (MOPD) Deputy Commissioner of Compliance Joe Russo How to Survey – MOPD Staff Jerod Lockhart and Mansoor Khan, on site ProjectNet – Chicago Transit Partners’ Michael Goff Cheerleader and Architectural Drawing Procurer – CTA Architect Lee Rogulich Mother Hen and Slave Driver – CTA ADA Compliance Officer Cara Levinson 6 TEAMS Survey Groups SPICEWISE HSIENCE AMBJDH Students analyzed data collectively 7 METHODOLOGY Survey developed by CTA & MOPD using Federal Transit Administration and City of Chicago Requirements Photos and architectural
[Show full text]
Transportation Committee Agenda Friday, November 18, 2016 9:30 A.M
Transportation Committee Agenda Friday, November 18, 2016 9:30 a.m. Cook County Conference Room 233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 800 Chicago, Illinois The Transit Forum will begin at 8:00 a.m. in the DuPage room 1.0 Call to Order/Introductions 9:30 a.m. 2.0 Agenda Changes and Announcements 3.0 Approval of Minutes— Oct 21, 2016 4.0 Coordinating Committee Reports In October 2016, the MPO Policy Committee and the CMAP Board approved a revised Coordinating Committee structure. The revised Committees—the Planning and Programming Committees-- have not yet met and will meet in early 2017. 5.0 FFY 14-19 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 5.1 Federal Fiscal Year 2017-2021 State/Regional Resource Table and Update to Selected Years of the TIP (Russell Pietrowiak) The State/Regional Resources Table has been developed for use in determining fiscal constraint. Implementers are in the process of awarding, moving or removing all FFY 2016 line items from the TIP. To assure continuation in programming, the selected years of the TIP specified in Attachment A of the TIP Change Procedures will be updated to FFY17. Action Requested: Acceptance of the FFY 2017-2021 State/Regional Resources Table and concurrence with the update of Attachment A of the TIP Change Procedures. 5.2 TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications (LeRoy Kos) TIP Amendment 17-01 was published to the eTIP web site on November 9, 2016 for committee review and public comment. A memo summarizing the formal TIP amendment 17-01 and administrative amendment 17-01.01 is attached.
[Show full text]
The CTA in Motion
The CTA In Motion 2001 Annual Budget Departmental Detail and 2001-2005 Capital Plan Chicago Transit Authority Proposed he Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada T(GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the Chicago Transit Authority, Illinois for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2000. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communication device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to January 1, 2000 conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. LN200026H CCHHIICCAAGGOO TTRRAANNSSIITT AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET DEPARTMENT DETAIL & 2001-2005 CAPITAL PROGRAM Proposed October 2000 Merchandise Mart Plaza, P.O. Box 3555, Chicago, Illinois 60654 SUMMARY The purpose of this document is two-fold: to provide department budgetary detail and to delineate the five-year capital program. To best accomplish this task, this document is divided into four main sections. The first three sections comprise the three major reporting units of CTA. Each of these sections begins with a brief department description and is followed by the accompanying department detail, including both the 2001 budget by expense category and organizational chart. The final section, Capital Detail, is presented in two parts. The first section provides a description for each project in the 2001 – 2005 Capital Program and is followed by a forecast of expenditures for major projects or project groupings.
[Show full text]
Park Evanston Flyer.Indd
Noyes St Maple Ave NOYES STATION Ridge Ave Haven St Payne St Gaffield Pl Green Bay Rd METRA Garrett Pl Simpson St N CampusDr Pratt Ct UNION PACIFIC NORTH LINE Ashland Ave Hamlin St Leon Pl Library Pl Jackson Ave EVANSTON • ILLINOIS Foster St FOSTER STATION Garnett Pl 94 3.5 miles Emerson St Wesely Ave Wesely Asbury Ave Ashland Ave NorthwesternNoN rtthwhwe te n ResearchRessesearcheaarchh ParkPaarkk University Pl Arts Cir E Railr Maple Ave ve Lyons St oad Av e Clark St ve 1/2 Mile Chicago A Radius Benson Ave Elgin R d Hinman A EVANSTONANSTON CBD Church St DAVIS STATION ve DAVIS STATION LAKE Davis St Orrington A MICHIGAN Oak Ave Elmwood Av CTA PURPLE LINE Elinor Pl Judson Ave e Grove St Raymond Lake St Lake St Park She rman Pl Greenwood St Chicago City Limits 2 miles = Public Parking Garage Chicago CBD 10 miles Dawes Park Dempster St DEMPSTER STATION The Location Located just ten miles north of Chicago’s central business district (CBD), Evanston was founded in 1854 by the founders of Northwestern University and quickly grew as a distinct community, independent from Chicago. Today Evanston is a dynamic, urban community with a population of nearly 76,000. Evanston is bordered by the City of Chicago to the south, Lake Michigan to the east, Wilmette to the north and Skokie to the west. Residents are drawn to Evanston’s expansive lakefront, 24/7 central business district, historic tree-lined neighborhoods and proximity to Northwestern University and downtown Chicago. Evanston has a vibrant and growing economy with more than 2,200 businesses that employ more than 38,000.
[Show full text]
Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis
Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis final report prepared for City of Evanston in association with Village of Skokie Regional Transportation Authority prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in association with Valerie S. Kretchmer & Associates, Inc. Bernadette Schleis & Associates, Inc. July 2007 www.camsys.com final report Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis prepared for City of Evanston in association with Village of Skokie Regional Transportation Authority prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 in association with Valerie S. Kretchmer & Associates, Inc. Bernadette Schleis & Associates, Inc. July 2007 Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Study Approach ............................................................................................................ ES-1 Population, Employment, Land Use, and Demographics....................................... ES-2 Existing Transportation Network............................................................................... ES-4 Travel Patterns............................................................................................................... ES-6 Market Evaluation ........................................................................................................ ES-8 Station Alternatives .....................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Main Street TOD Plan and Study
Table of Contents List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms Used in this Document .................................................................................. 6 ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 7 ES.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 7 ES.2 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................... 8 ES.3 Public Involvement ................................................................................................ 11 ES.4 Recommended Improvements ............................................................................. 11 ES.5 Potential Revenue and Financing Techniques ................................................... 22 ES.6 Transit Oriented Development Potential ........................................................... 23 ES.7 Project Recommendations .................................................................................... 26 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 36 1.1 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................
[Show full text]
<AECOM Report>
FINAL DRAFT Des Plaines Station Feasibility Study Existing Conditions Technical Memorandum City of Des Plaines April 2, 2019 Des Plaines Station Feasibilty Study Prepared for: The City of Des Plaines Prepared by: AECOM 303 East Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 aecom.com In association with: The Lakota Group Prepared for: the City of Des Plaines AECOM Existing Conditions Tech Memo Des Plaines Station Feasibilty Study Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Background and Station Purpose ................................................................................................................ 6 3. Regional Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 7 4. Station Site Screening ................................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Station Spacing ................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Station Elements ............................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Des Plaines Oakton Street Station Layout Concept .......................................................................... 10 5. Definition of Station Market Sheds ............................................................................................................
[Show full text]