Flash Flooding ❑ Impervious Cover & Zoning Decisions ❑ Proposal – Wingohocking Overlay District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flash Flooding ❑ Impervious Cover & Zoning Decisions ❑ Proposal – Wingohocking Overlay District Why does E Mt Airy have so many “Road May Flood” signs? ❑ Wingohocking Watershed ❑ Flash Flooding ❑ Impervious Cover & Zoning Decisions ❑ Proposal – Wingohocking Overlay District Kelly O’Day, PE Retired BS Civil Engineering MS Environmental Engineering Mt Airy Watersheds Wissahickon Tookany – Tacony – Frankford (TTF) Gowen Source: 1843 Map of Philadelphia County - Charles Ellet, Jr Wingohocking What happened to Source: Philadelphia Water Dept. Wingohocking Creek? http://phillyh2o.org Wingohocking Creek Encased In Combined Sewer ❑ Early residents built private sewers to carry their raw sewage to Wingohocking Creek tributaries ❑ Raw sewage created local odor & potential health problems ❑ City viewed burying Wingohocking Creek as way to solve potential health hazards ❑ Burying Creek started in Germantown in 1880s, full creek burial completed in 1928 ❑ Progressed upstream and downstream as development increased ❑ Wingohocking Creek was encased in a combined sewer ❑ Carried original creek flow, residential sewage, stormwater runoff ❑ In 1928 discharged to Frankford Creek ❑ Later carried to treatment plant and then to Wingohocking Creek Combined Sewer under construction, 1909 the Delaware River. Wingohocking Sewer Outfall Frankford Creek – Juniata Park Wingohocking Creek Tacony Creek Frankford Creek Tacony Creek Drainage Areas Drains to Tacony Creek By Roosevelt Blvd Historic Wingohocking Drains to Frankford Creek By Juniata Park Hydraulic Capacity and Flooding Natural Rivers versus Combined Sewers ❑ Flooding occurs when upstream flows greater than downstream capacity ❑ Natural streams and rivers have flood plains that hold flood waters during extreme flow events 1. Natural Watershed Burying Wingohocking Changed Watershed Land Use Development & Flood Plain 2. Buried Wingohocking Creek 5. Continued Development, Impervious Cover Germantown Ave Stenton Ave 3. Built streets 4. Built houses 1. Encased Creek in Sewer 2. Filled Creek Channel Up to 48-feet ❑No visible creek ❑Development close to combined sewer ❑Developed area floods when combined sewer capacity exceeded ❑Flooding risk – not identified on FEMA maps Hydraulic Capacity and Flooding Natural Rivers versus Combined Sewers ❑ Flooding occurs when upstream flows greater than downstream capacity ❑ Natural streams and rivers have flood plains that hold flood waters during extreme flow events ❑ Combined sewers are rigid pipelines with fixed capacity, they do not have flood plains to hold flood waters during extreme flow events. Excess stormwater flow: o Overflows manholes o Backs up into plumbing systems o Inundates streets/ sidewalks o Floods adjacent houses/ businesses o Damages pipe, can lead to pipeline failure Belfield Ave & Haines Street Buried Wingohocking Sewer Under Belfield Ave. East Mt Airy Runoff and Deadly East Germantown Flash Flood Thursday, Sept. 8, 2011 “Pastor Todd Dunbar, who heads Praise, Power and Deliverance Church, was left looking for a place to house his congregation after more than six feet of water rushed through the building.” WHYY NewsWorks, 9/10/11 High Flood Water Line City Recognizes Wingohocking Flash Flooding Wingohocking Watershed RCOs Roles in Addressing Flash Flooding 1. Stormwater Regulations Review 2. Zoning Variance Review: address stormwater – flash flooding aspects of projects 3. Support Creation of Historic Wingohocking Overlay District along lines of Wissahickon Overlay District 4. Support PWD’s Germantown Storm Flash Relief Capital Improvement Plan 1. Stormwater Regulations Review The PWD Stormwater Regulations require on-site stormwater management for development projects that disturb 15,000 square feet (5,000 in certain watersheds) of earth disturbance. ❑ City-wide: projects > 15,000 square feet ▪ Water Quality – manage the first 1 inch ▪ Channel Protection – infiltrate or slow release 1-year, 24-hour storm (2.6 inches) ▪ Flood control – peak rate control of post to pre-development conditions ❑ Cobbs & Darby Creeks: projects > 5,000 square feet, Pa Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan ❑ Wissahickon: Overlay District Historic Wingohocking Watershed needs flooding protections Like those provided by Wissahickon Overlay District 2. Zoning Variance Review & Flash Flooding in Wingohocking Watershed Wingohocking Stormwater – Flash Flooding Education ❑ Zoning Committee ❑ Residents ❑ Developers 6. Increase danger of flooding? Flood Prone Wingohocking Zoning Review Questions Submitted to City Officials - 4/1/19 1. When in the City’s zoning review process does PWD review proposed site stormwater control plans for a site with disturbance greater than 15,000 square feet? Does this apply to both “by right” and “by variance” projects? 2. Can an RCO, neighbor or citizen raise flooding concerns about a proposed project less than 15,000 square feet on sites upstream of flash flood prone areas in Wingohocking Sewershed? If yes, when in the process and who should be contacted? 3. Can an RCO request the Water Department to prepare a hydraulic assessment/ flash flood assessment for a proposed project in the Wingohocking Sewershed prior to the RCO public meeting for a ZBA variance application? 4. Can developers voluntarily submit site plans for stormwater reviews for projects less than 15,000 square feet for sites upstream of flash flood prone areas in Wingohocking Sewershed? If yes, who should be contacted? 5. Are PWD stormwater regulation plan reviews in the Wingohocking Sewershed available for public review? 6. How does L&I, the Planning Commission and Water Department review the Variance Appeal question 6, “will the variance you seek …. increase the danger of flooding?” question? Is there any independent assessment of the accuracy of the applicant’s response? 7. The Planning Commission representative at the ZBA hearing is specifically asked if the Planning Commission has any comments on the variance application before the Board votes. Does Planning Commission staff, Flood Task Force or PWD staff advise the Planning Commission representative about any potential flooding issues of the variance application in the Wingohocking Sewershed prior to the ZBA hearing? 3. Support Historic Wingohocking Overlay District Wissahickon Overlay Provides Prototype Wissahickon Watershed Overlay (WWO) ❑ To help reduce flooding, erosion, siltation, and channel enlargement, additional stormwater management requirements and impervious coverage limits may apply to projects in Wissahickon watershed. ❑ Requirements depend on the location and amount of impervious cover proposed ❑ In the WWO District: ▪ Planning Commission determines if additional stormwater management requirements are applicable ▪ Depending on location, lot size, and change in impervious area, PCPC may restrict new impervious cover, or impose additional stormwater management requirements beyond PWD’s Stormwater Regulations ▪ PCPC does not use an earth disturbance threshold when determining whether stormwater management is required. Therefore, it is possible for development projects to trigger Stormwater Management Requirements under the WWO without triggering the Stormwater Regulations. ▪ Water Department reviews the Stormwater Management Plan Historic Wingohocking Watershed needs a Flash Flooding Overlay District 4. Support PWD’s Germantown Storm Flood Relief Capital Improvement Plan Germantown Storm Flood Relief Capital Improvement Plan PWD Long Term solution Likely Actions ❑ Reduce impervious cover ❑ Retain more stormwater in watershed ❑ Address high risk properties ❑ Increase hydraulic capacity ❑ RFP issued Nov., 2015 ❑ Draft Report – Nov., 2018 ❑ Report – Summer, 2019 How Can E Mt Airy Residents Help Reduce Wingohocking Flooding Risk? ❑ Understand that EMA runoff affects downstream EMA & E Germantown ❑ Reduce Impervious Cover to Reduce Stormwater Runoff & Flash Flood Risk o Rain Barrels, Rain Gardens o Redirect roof runoff to yard o Reduce impervious cover ❑ Review proposed land use changes for stormwater . Flash Flood impacts ❑ Encourage EMA BID, EMAN, Mt Airy USA to initiate/ expand/ support stormwater reduction programs ❑ Support Historic Wingohocking Zoning Overlay Now that we know why E Mt Airy has so many “Road May Flood” signs, it’s time to Act! Special Thanks WHYY NewsWorks– E Germantown Flooding Articles PWD - Wingohocking Combined Sewer Constructions Photos Adam Levine – PhillyH2O blog: Historical information on Wingohocking Creek OpenDataPhilly – incredible Philadelphia data resources available on-line.
Recommended publications
  • Continuing Education Fall 2013
    Morris Arboretum Continuing Education Fall 2013 GROWING MINDS Nature Sleuths CULINARY ADVENTURES Botany of Beer Chocolate & Wine Tasting BOTANY The World of Mosses CREATIVE EXPRESSIONS Digital Photography TRIPS From Creek to Sewer become a member and save All Membership Levels Include: Premier Memberships • FREE unlimited general admission for a year. Premier Memberships admit up to two named • Complimentary one-time use guest passes.* membership cardholders and their children • DISCOUNTS in the Shop, at the Café, and (or up to 4 grandchildren) 18 and under. on educational classes and excursions. • DISCOUNTS at local garden centers and Beech $115 4 free passes* other retailers. $220 (2 Year Membership ~ Save $10) 8 free passes* • FREE admission to special events. Members enjoy all the general benefits, plus • MEMBERS ONLY Plant Sale Day, plus • Invitation to the Holiday Garden Railway Evening. 1 FREE bonus plant. • RECIPROCAL ADMISSION privileges to over Chestnut $165 6 free passes* 200 gardens. Members enjoy all the benefits of Beech, plus • Seasons newsletter. • BRING 2 FRIENDS – Save your guest passes. Show • E-Newsletter, keeps you up-to-date on all our events. your membership card and get free admission for two • Morris Arboretum automobile decal. additional friends every time you visit the Arboretum. • Attend the Plant Sale Preview. General Memberships Holly $250 6 free passes* Individual Members enjoy all the benefits of Chestnut, plus • Beautiful full-color calendar. $60 (1 Year Membership) 2 free passes* • Invitations to exclusive Arboretum events for $115 (2 Year Membership ~ Save $5) 4 free passes* Premier members. • Admits one named member. • Additional bonus plant at the Plant Sale (2 total).
    [Show full text]
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]
    REFEI IENCE Ji ffi OOLLE( ]TIONS S-A 9"7 Y.<P H VCf Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun66unse as ... > . INDEX, Page B Page ft <H 4 • H 'p5 'i'T* ^ l I y,bV INDEX. 5age S '1 ' 3age Pag* "S i • s . *■ • • W T uv w IL . 1. , j ’■- w* W ■ : XYZ . I r—;-- Mb . ,_ tr_ .... »> '' mi - . ■ nothing? It is rather a new method to white- I “ nuts for future historians TO CRACK.” * wash one’s “great-grandfather” by blacken-P % ing another man’s “grandfather.” Is it to ' Immense and '(Overwhelming in importance j make money ? Alas! Mr. Editor, for the to future historians as Mr. Smith’s work is, j sake’ of decency I regret to say it is. t we confess after cracking his nuts we found! The long delay in the publication, the the kernels to be wretchedly shrivelled-up i frequent announcements in the newspapers affairs. They are, most of them, what Mr. 1 of what teas to appear, as though held Toots would say, “ decidedly of no conse- | I in terror en% over parties known to be j quence.” After investigating his labors we 1 ■ sensitive on the subject, conclusively show <; have arrived at this conclusion, that the:| Cr' this to be the object. But if more be author, notwithstanding his literary anteee-! wanting, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Green City, Clean Waters
    Amended Green City Clean Waters The City of Philadelphia’s Program for Combined Sewer Overflow Control Program Summary Amended by the Philadelphia Water Department June 1, 2011 The creation and implementation of The Philadelphia Water Department is pleased to announce the approval by the Commonwealth of our Green City, Clean Waters vision Pennsylvania of our Green City, Clean Waters plan as amended through negotiations with the Pennsylvania is made possible as a result of the Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) since its submission in September, 2009. This program contributions of our partner City represents the City of Philadelphia’s commitment towards meeting our regulatory obligations while help- agencies and departments that provided, and continue to share ing to revitalize our City. Our Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Long Term Control Plan Update (LTCPU) their expertise, guidance and support submitted in September, 2009 explains how this vision and the commitment to its implementation grew toward the realization of this plan. out of our history, built on our extensive watershed analysis and planning, and is continually informed by local and national policy trends. The full LTCPU document is available online for download at www.philly- Streets Department watersheds.org/ltcpu/. Mayor’s Office of Sustainability Through evaluation of a number of alternative implementation approaches, we determined that a green Philadelphia Parks & Recreation stormwater infrastructure-based approach would provide maximum return in environmental,
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement for Lower Northeast Planning District 2012
    ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH AND CULTURAL HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTING HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT 2012 HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT EMILY T. COOPERMAN, PH.D. Geographical Summary The Lower Northeast Planning District (figure 1) lies inland (northwest) of the Delaware River waterfront at the point where the northeast and northwest sections of the city branch off from north Philadelphia. The Lower Northeast Planning District is characterized by relatively flat topography that rises gradually from the southeast to the northwest, moving away from the river. The Planning District is bounded on the southwest by the Frankford and Tacony creeks, and abuts Montgomery County on the northwest just south of the Tacony Creek as it turns to the northeast. The Tacony Creek becomes the Frankford Creek at the point where it historically met the Wingohocking Creek, which flowed east from Germantown and is now culverted, near the intersection of Tabor Road and Garland Street. Historically, the Little Tacony Creek flowed in several branches through the heart of the Planning District, meeting the Frankford Creek below where Erie Avenue is now located. Figure 1. Lower Northeast Planning District, outlined in black, with the area previously studied shown in gray LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT HISTORIC CONTEXT – PAGE 1 ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH AND CULTURAL HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTING HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT 2012 Introduction The Lower Northeast Planning District can be divided into three general zones that developed at different rates. The settlement and industrial village of Frankford, which was studied in the Historic Context Statement for Neighborhood Cluster 1 (2008-2009), was the historic town center of the Planning District and was one of several such urban concentrations that developed in Philadelphia’s former county before the 1854 Consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Green2015-An-Action-Plan-For-The
    Green2015 Advisory Group Conveners and Participating Organizations Michael DiBerardinis, Department of Parks and Recreation Commissioner, co-convener Alan Greenberger, Deputy Mayor for Economic Development, co-convener Amtrak Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Fairmount Park Conservancy Fairmount Park Historic Preservation Trust Friends of the Wissahickon Greenspace Alliance Natural Land Trust Neighborhood Gardens Association Next Great City Coalition Office of City Councilman Darrell Clarke Office of Councilwoman Anna Verna Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Environmental Council Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Philadelphia Association of Community Development Corporations Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia Department of Commerce Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections Philadelphia Department of Public Health Philadelphia Department of Public Property Philadelphia Department of Revenue Philadelphia Housing Authority Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation Philadelphia Office of Housing and Community Development Philadelphia Office of Sustainability Philadelphia Office of Transportation and Utilities Philadelphia Orchard Project Philadelphia Parks Alliance Philadelphia Parks and Recreation Commission Philadelphia Water Department Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia School District of Philadelphia Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]
    •. «< '• . : ; ■TtA*-t4ww: P3PHI Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun38unse M^RK TWAIN’S SoRdr 6QG PATENT 281.657. TRADE MARKS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. Registered No. 5,896. Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTIONS. Use but little moisture, and only on the gummed lines. Press the scrap on without wetting it. DANIEL SLOTE & COMPANY, NEW YORK. 1 ‘ « CttCCC t t cc t * ‘ I t [I I i I* (t( ( c 4 « C t l t t C C C c c tc tc«cticc etc C C uv -W W XYZ If DOOOOOOOOq 0 0 ON lj 1 R 000000000000 ——-— In the Winter camp officers clubbed to; amusement, and ther billiard playing, glei not. The programme been complete witho wasn’t poker-playing fresh, crisp greenbac the plans for the new city, which, being approved, he immediately laid out.' Yet to-day when his beloved city is making its preparations for the greatest From, jubilee of peace in its history, this man’s name is almost unknown, and this man’s grave remains without a flower, unswept, without one glance of honor in its direc¬ tion. On the other side of the little monu¬ ment are the words:— Date frUF /Sff “He became proprietor of 1646. acres of land in one tract by grant of William Penn in 16S4, named it his ‘Well Spring Plantation,’ of which this spot is part.’’ THE GRAVE OF THE MAN WHO • • * PLANNED OUR CITY OF f LIES NEGLECTED IN ITS VERY V * • .
    [Show full text]
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]
    REFE1IENCE ff £ COLLEI MS i jT-/t 3tC/f V. ~?y < / e Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun74unse MARK TW^IISTS scftap moK. PA TENTS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. FRANCE. June 24TH, 1873. May i6th, 1877. May i8th, 1877. TRADE MARKS: UNITED STATES. ■ GREAT BRITAIN. Registered No. 5,896. Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTIONS. Use but little moisture, and only on the gummed lines. Press the scrap on without wetting it. DANIEL SLOTE & COMPANY, NEW YORK. INDEX. U V w • V t'wmm V. f , ‘ ■ ■ .. \ >: ' ■ . • . ‘ , ‘ . : . , . , / -*1 \ •: . « ; , > r w X YZ "owns a great portion of the"ground, most. • :> of it located on the Schuylkill river be¬ S From, . low Wharton street, which by the open¬ ing of streets, and the enterprise of the \y.C^yr.r. owner, is fast coming into demand for public uses. League Island is separated from Green¬ Date, ...iJ,.‘..‘.(?..i. ../4/vrfy. wich Island by the Back channel, which s forms a commodious and fresh-water an- ’’i chorage for the iron-clads of our navy. DOal^-TOWfl Extensive improvements are proposed to be carried out on the island. A perma¬ nent plant will be established for the Something of Its History and Biographical building and repairing of ships for the Sketches of Some of its Former navy. This island was granted in 1699 Leading Citizens to the London Company, which ten years afterwards conveyed it to Thomas Fair- man.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Towns and Districts of Philadelphia
    Old Towns and Districts of Philadelphia by WILLIAM BUCKE CAMPBELL, A.M, Philadelphia History Vol. IV, No. 5 City History Society of Philadelphia 1942 F158 .68 .Al C36 1942 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES THEGP S[-.1,./, ,i, ,, I, ,I, a, b ,,,, U t 1 I;',4 -) in1, d' i ' I i,|"r'), A;F'S Old Towns and Districts of Philadelphia An Address Delivered before the City History Society of Philadelphia February 26, 1941 by WILLIAM BUCKE CAMPBELL, A.M. City History Society of Philadelphia 1942 Copyright, 1942, by William Bucke Campbell POLITICAL DIVISIONS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ra, in Square Population, Mfles, in 1853 Census of 1850 A. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. 2.277= 1.8% 121,376= 29.7% B. DISTRICTS: 1. Southwark.............................. 1.050 38,799 2. Northern Liberties............ .556 47,223 3. Kensington .......................... 1.899 46,774 4. Spring Garden .................. 1.639 58,894 5. Moyamensing....................... 2.616 26,979 6. Penn ("South Penn")... 1.984 8,939 7. Richmond .............................. 2.226 5,750 8. West Philadelphia ............ 2.417 5,571 9. Belmont ................................ 5.097 19.484= 15.0% 238,929= 58.4% C. BOROUGHS: 1. Germantown ............. 3.152 6,209 2. Frankford ................. 1.468 5,346 3. Manayunk ................. .614 6,158 4. Bridesburg .................... 1.109 915 5. Whitehall ..............-- .471 6. Aramingo.......... ....... 1.700 8.514= 6.6% 18,628= 4.6% D. TOWNSHIPS: 1. Passyunk ----------------------- 9.927 1.607 2. Blockley .. .... 5.658 5,916 3. Kingsessing .... .. 8.923 1,778 4. Roxborough .. .... 6.804 2,660 5. Germantown ...... 7.564 2.127 6. B ristol .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tacony-Frankford Creek River Conservation Plan
    Final Report Tacony-Frankford Creek River Conservation Plan February 18, 2004 Final Report Tacony-Frankford Creek River Conservation Plan FGM Frankford Group Ministries Project was funded by a Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund Program grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and (215) 345-7020 Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. (215) 345-4328 Fax www.heritageconservancy.org Philadelphia Water Department Tacony/Frankford Creek River Conservation Plan Acknowledgements ......................................................................i List of Abbreviations ..................................................................iii Table of List of Maps ................................................................................iv List of Tables, Figures and Appendices .....................................v Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................1 Goals ............................................................................................2 II. Public Meetings ...........................................................................5 III. Resource Inventory .....................................................................7 Issues, Concerns, Constraints .....................................................7 Study Area Overview ..................................................................8 Topography, Geology, Soils .....................................................10 Demographics............................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Recommendations for the Upper Northwest Planning District
    PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE UPPER NORTHWEST PLANNING DISTRICT JON FARNHAM, KIM CHANTRY, LAURA DIPASQUALE, AND MEREDITH KELLER, STAFF OF THE PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION AND CORY KEGERISE, STAFF OF THE PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL & MUSEUM COMMISSION 2017 1 INTRODUCTION The Philadelphia City Planning Commission has requested that the Philadelphia Historical Commission review the historical development of Upper Northwest Planning District and ongoing historic preservation initiatives in the area and then offer recommendations for enhancing those initiatives that might be incorporated into the plan, one of the 18 district plans that will accompany the overall Comprehensive City Plan, Philadelphia2035. In response to the request, the staff of the Historical Commission offers the following informal recommendations that have not been vetted by the 14- member Historical Commission itself. THE UPPER NORTHWEST PLANNING DISTRICT The Upper Northwest Planning District encompasses the neighborhoods of Germantown, East Germantown, Blue Bell Hill, West Mount Airy, East Mount Airy, and Chestnut Hill. 2 BRIEF HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UPPER NORTHWEST PLANNING DISTRICT The area comprising the Upper Northwest Planning District was home to the Native Americans of the Lenni Lenape tribe long before the arrival of Europeans. The area is bounded at the southwest by the Wissahickon Creek, a corruption of the Lenape phrase meaning “catfish stream,” and at the northeast by the Wingohocking Creek, a corruption of “a favorite spot for planting.” German settlers, at first thirteen Quaker and Mennonite families from the Lower Rhineland town of Krefeld seeking religious freedom, began arriving in the area in 1683. The group was led by Francis Daniel Pastorius, who negotiated with William Penn for the 5700-acre tract.
    [Show full text]
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]
    p 3 to n ■ V. 1C- s § \ 1 I f i * \ 4 \ 1 3 ) > 3 i I . \ * « 4 : .• . \ / • a * - MARK T WAI UST’S Soiiar no ok. FATE NT S UNITED STATES. GREA T BRITAIN. FRANCE. June 24th, 1873. May 1 6th,''t&7 7. May i8th, 1877. TRADE MARKS UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. Registered No. 5,896. Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTIONS. Use but little moisture, and only on the gummed lines. Press the scrap on without wetting it. DANIEL SLOTE & COM: NY, SEW YORK. jg insrzDiEix: U V w 1f V D 11 i! w X Y Z From MOKE ABOUT BLOOKLLY. QL^FHITEHALL mansion BY MISS MARGARET B. HARVEY. A Pathetic Story of the Landmark from which that Section of Frankford Derives Its Name. An old decayed wooden mansion with pil- Read Before Merton fbajiler, Dangb- | 'ars *n front, which was considered impos¬ ters of tbe American Kevolnliou. ing1 and stately in its day, was an inter- - esting landmark of Frankford. It was lo- j cated in the Twenty-third Ward on the The first general tax-list for Philadelphia left of the railway near the track, looking eonnty was made in 1693. The origins! i toward Bridesburg. The old mansion was j called Whitehall. The neighborhood bears assessment list is in possession of the His- that name to this day and is supposed to : torical Society of Pennsylvania. It is have derived its title from the old land¬ mark. copied entire in the new “Memorial His¬ j _ Jesse Wain built the mansion and lived tory of Philadelphia,” by Howard M.
    [Show full text]
  • North Philadelphia
    ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH AND CULTURAL HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTING HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR NORTH PLANNING DISTRICT 2012 HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR NORTH PLANNING DISTRICT EMILY T. COOPERMAN, PH.D. Introduction The North Philadelphia Planning District is a zone that, in contrast to other portions of what is now the city, had no historic early concentration of population analogous to the growth in Frankford or Germantown before the nineteenth century, and it was not marked by settlement before the establishment of the Pennsylvania Colony at the end of the seventeenth century. The territory of the district was relatively remote from settlements and village developments in Germantown, Frankford, Center City, and along the Delaware, and there was no easy access to this river for the transportation of people and goods. The two historic inland waterways in the Planning District, Wingohocking and Penn creeks, were not the focus of significant amounts of early industrial use because of this relative remoteness and the fact that they were the upper limits of their watersheds and therefore provided relatively low potential power. The land of the Planning District lay in what were two townships within Philadelphia County. Most of the district was located in the Northern Liberties lands, whose northern limit was roughly at Wingohocking Street. A smaller portion of the district, the roughly triangular segment loosely bounded by Roosevelt Boulevard, Wingohocking Street, and Frankford Creek, lay in Bristol Township. In 1808, Penn Township was divided from Northern Liberties, with Germantown Avenue as the boundary, indicating growth between this road and the Schuylkill River. The development of the Planning District began, as did most of the area of Philadelphia County, as country seats.
    [Show full text]