Impact What Is It and How Do We Create It?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impact What Is It and How Do We Create It? Impact What is it and how do we create it? Joshua Knowles School of Computer Science The University of Manchester COMP80142 — Week 2 2.19, March 19 2014 COMP80142 — Impact 2 2.19, March 19 2014 How to make an impact (case 1) “Bouyed by the success of leaded petrol, Midgely now turned to another technological problem of the age. [...] With an instinct for the regrettable that was almost uncanny, he invented chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs.” Bill Bryson, A Short History of Nearly Everything COMP80142 — Impact 3 2.19, March 19 2014 Lecture Summary What is impact? How to have it, including some well-known cases Impact in EPSRC and REF terms (brief) Against impact COMP80142 — Impact 4 2.19, March 19 2014 What is impact? [ Discussion (5 mins) ] Make a list of measurable or concrete ways in which your work (specifically research papers) could have impact. COMP80142 — Impact 5 2.19, March 19 2014 What is impact? You get a patent. Careful: you shouldn’t publish a paper first Your idea is implemented in a small company Your idea becomes part of the standard C library, or is behind all internet security globally A technique many people use is due to you, even named after you You are on QI, Stargazing Live and used to be in a rock band You teach, inspire, and enthuse the general public via popular writing or other media COMP80142 — Impact 6 2.19, March 19 2014 Your review or survey is used by everyone in the introduction of papers Your paper gets many citations. Is that impact? You win a prize. Is that impact? Your paper is published in a prestigious journal. Is that impact? You are made professor of computer science at Stanford. Is that impact? COMP80142 — Impact 7 2.19, March 19 2014 What is impact? EPSRC carves it up like this COMP80142 — Impact 8 2.19, March 19 2014 How to make an impact (case 2) Invent The World Wide Web Tim Berners-Lee may not have fully appreciated the impact that the invention of the World Wide Web would have, but he did have an idea; he was driven by doing something that would help scientists at CERN (and more widely) share and organize data more readily. He was tool driven. The impact was from this . COMP80142 — Impact 9 2.19, March 19 2014 . to this COMP80142 — Impact 10 2.19, March 19 2014 How to make an impact: the hard route Do outstanding science, stupid. But that may be a hard trick to pull off, especially if you miss/missed any of Research Methods I, II or III. Good advice, however, can be found here: Advice to a Young Scientist (Peter Medawar) The Act of Creation (Arthur Koestler) Letters to a Young Scientist (Edward O Wilson) COMP80142 — Impact 11 2.19, March 19 2014 How to make an impact: the easier route Write well Use rhetoric to persuade Be generous to others in your field Be bold Tackle problems of wide interest Create tools or data Explain ways that your idea could be developed further. COMP80142 — Impact 12 2.19, March 19 2014 How to make an impact: the easier route Write well Use rhetoric to persuade Be generous to others in your field Be bold Tackle problems of wide interest Create tools or data Explain ways that your idea could be developed further. COMP80142 — Impact 13 2.19, March 19 2014 Be generous to others in your field The Young Upstart Scenario You are new to the field. You write a paper that states that some big- name professor is wrong about everything he’s published in his long and illustrious career. What is the chance you get it published? If you get it published, what is the chance you make friends? What is the chance you are highly cited? Don’t you think it would be wise to take a softly, softly approach? COMP80142 — Impact 14 2.19, March 19 2014 More generally, Don’t say: There have been some limited and isolated uses of hypertext (Berners-Lee, 89), but we here invent a groundbreaking revolution that eclipses previous achievements by allowing hyperlinks to appear pink when clicked. Do say: “I have stood on the shoulders of giants” [although probably not so dramatically] Do this because it is the right thing to do. Respect others’ work as much as you can. COMP80142 — Impact 15 2.19, March 19 2014 Be bold At the same time as being generous and humble, you do need to be bold. This means your paper should come down clearly on one side or the other of some question, challenge or technical mystery. COMP80142 — Impact 16 2.19, March 19 2014 Imagine after your paper is published. Will someone else be able to write of you (Jones): Jones presented evidence [or a well-argued case] in support of X. Peters [some other person] took the opposite view, arguing Z. Or will they have to write: Jones thought that the question as to whether X, or Y or Z is true is debatable. Most people would find the latter weak writing about weak science, and will cut Jones out of the story. COMP80142 — Impact 17 2.19, March 19 2014 Create tools or data Papers that provide tools (software), data (benchmark problems or results) or other useful resources to the community are cited more, as a group, than those that don’t. Example (from my field): Of all JE Beasley’s (∼ 100) papers, his most cited, and the one for which he is perhaps best known describes the OR-Library, a resource to distribute test optimization problems by email. COMP80142 — Impact 18 2.19, March 19 2014 Discussion point [5 minutes] Should science be pursued for its own sake, or only for its impact? Subsidiary questions: Is impact predictable or even measurable? How could you quantify the impact of Brian Cox? COMP80142 — Impact 19 2.19, March 19 2014 How to make an impact (case 3) No pun intended: Although obviously curious, Leonardo was a paid inventor for much of his life. COMP80142 — Impact 20 2.19, March 19 2014 Impact for the EPSRC Proposals for grants or fellowships are required (by EPSRC at least) to have an Impact Summary and a Pathways to Impact statement. More information on these can be found here http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/funding/guidance/preparing/Pages/economicimpact.aspx COMP80142 — Impact 21 2.19, March 19 2014 Impact and the Research Excellence Framework (REF) The research councils now attempt to measure research impact for each unit of assessment (e.g. Computer Science) within each University. Funding is based partly on this score. The REF definitions explain that impact is change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy, . So publishing in “high-impact” journals is not enough, and nor is being highly cited. See more details here http://www.thinkwrite.biz/pdfs/quick impact.pdf COMP80142 — Impact 22 2.19, March 19 2014 An extract from an ‘Impact Case’ for REF can be seen here http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/background/impact/physics.pdf COMP80142 — Impact 23 2.19, March 19 2014 COMP80142 — Impact 24 2.19, March 19 2014 Against impact Changes to EPSRC funding policy over the past two years [. ] are rapidly undermining the councils ability to fund the type of curiosity-driven research that won Geim and his colleague Konstantin Novoselov the 2010 Nobel Prize for Physics. These changes are driven to a large extent by the fact that all grant applicants are required to submit a two-page Pathways to impact statement. Philip Moriarty University of Nottingham, UK COMP80142 — Impact 25 2.19, March 19 2014 Against impact Several scientists have stated that science should be driven by curiosity. Examples of discoveries that resulted primarily from curiosity are the following:- Special and General Relativity Penicillin The Higgs Boson Green Fluorescent Protein Wireless LAN (resulting from radio astronomy) COMP80142 — Impact 26 2.19, March 19 2014 Against impact The Higgs Boson — small gravity, big impact “Today, I wouldn’t get an academic job” (Peter Higgs) ‘Higgs said he became “an embarrassment to the department when they did research assessment exercises”. A message would go around the department saying: “Please give a list of your recent publications.” Higgs said: “I would send back a statement: ‘None.’ ” ’ http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/06/peter-higgs-boson-academic-system COMP80142 — Impact 27 2.19, March 19 2014 Summary Impact is a buzz word in science and academia We are supposed to pursue it and predict it, yet it is clear the best science is done out of curiosity or for its own sake in many cases However, thinking about the impact of your work is still worthwhile as long as you don’t lose your curiosity, and don’t spend all your time checking whether your ideas made someone else wealthy or famous Impact is not new. Science has always needed funding, and funders tend to want results COMP80142 — Impact 28 2.19, March 19 2014.
Recommended publications
  • Fotonica Ed Elettronica Quantistica
    Fotonica ed elettronica quantistica http://www.dsf.unica.it/~fotonica/teaching/fotonica.html Fotonica ed elettronica quantistica Quantum optics - Quantization of electromagnetic field - Statistics of light, photon counting and noise; - HBT and correlation; g1 e g2 coherence; antibunching; single photons - Squeezing - Quantum cryptography - Quantum computer, entanglement and teleportation Light-matter Interaction - Two-level atom - Laser physics - Spectroscopy - Electronics and photonics at the nanometer scale - Cold atoms - Photodetectors - Solar cells http://www.dsf.unica.it/~fotonica/teaching/fotonica.html Energy Temperature LHC at CERN, Higgs, SUSY, ??? TeV 15 q q particle accelerators 10 K q GeV proton rest mass - quarks 1012K MeV electron rest mass / gamma rays 109K keV Nuclear Fusion, x rays, Sun center 106K Atoms ionize - visible light eV Sun surface fundamental components components fundamental room temperature 103K meV Liquid He, superconductors, space 1K dilution refrigerators, quantum Hall µeV laser-cooled atoms 10-3K neV Bose-Einstein condensates 10-6K peV low T record 480 picokelvin 10-9K -12 complexity, organization organization complexity, 10 K Nobel Prizes in Physics 2010 - Andre Geims, Konstantin Novoselov 2009 - Charles K. Kao, Willard S. Boyle, George E. Smith 2007 - Albert Fert, Peter Gruenberg 2005 - Roy J. Glauber, John L. Hall, Theodor W. Hänsch 2001 - Eric A. Cornell, Wolfgang Ketterle, Carl E. Wieman 1997 - Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, William D. Phillips 1989 - Norman F. Ramsey, Hans G. Dehmelt, Wolfgang Paul 1981 - Nicolaas Bloembergen, Arthur L. Schawlow, Kai M. Siegbahn 1966 - Alfred Kastler 1964 - Charles H. Townes, Nicolay G. Basov, Aleksandr M. Prokhorov 1944 - Isidor Isaac Rabi 1930 - Venkata Raman 1921 - Albert Einstein 1907 - Albert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Como Citar Este Artigo Número Completo Mais Informações Do
    Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação ISSN: 1518-2924 Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Informação - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina STANFORD, Jailiny Fernanda Silva; SILVA, Fábio Mascarenhas e Prêmio Nobel como fator de influência nas citações dos pesquisadores: uma análise dos laureados de Química e Física (2005 - 2015) Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, vol. 26, e73786, 2021, Janeiro-Abril Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Informação - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e73786 Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14768130002 Como citar este artigo Número completo Sistema de Informação Científica Redalyc Mais informações do artigo Rede de Revistas Científicas da América Latina e do Caribe, Espanha e Portugal Site da revista em redalyc.org Sem fins lucrativos acadêmica projeto, desenvolvido no âmbito da iniciativa acesso aberto Artigo Original Prêmio Nobel como fator de influência nas citações dos pesquisadores: uma análise dos laureados de Química e Física (2005 - 2015) Nobel Prize as an influencing factor in researchers' citations: an analysis of Chemistry and Physics laureates (2005 to 2015) Jailiny Fernanda Silva STANFORD Mestre em Ciência da Informação (PPGCI/UFPE) Bibliotecária-chefe Seminário Teológico Batista do Norte do Brasil (STBNB), Recife, Brasil [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-6561 Fábio Mascarenhas e SILVA Doutor em Ciência da Informação (USP), Professor Associado Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Ciência da Informação, Recife, Brasil [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5566-5120 A lista completa com informações dos autores está no final do artigo RESUMO Objetivo: Analisa a influência nos índices de citação por parte dos pesquisadores que foram contemplados pelo prêmio Nobel nas áreas da Física e Química no período de 2005 a 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Biggest General Science Conference Concludes Successfully
    SCIENCEScience PagesPAGES Special Report - ESOF 2016 Europe’s biggest generalSpecial Report science conference concludes successfully ESOF 2016, Europe's biggest general science conference concludes successfully in Manchester,in Manchester,UK UK Theme: Science as Revolution Theme: Science as Revolution - Veena Patwardhan rom 23rd to 27th July, 2016, FManchester flaunted its City of Science status as the host city of the seventh edition of EuroScience Open Forum (ESOF 2016). A bi- ennial event held in a different European city every two years, this time it was Manchester's turn to host this globally reputed science conference. Around 4500 delegates – scien- tists, innovators, academics, young researchers, journalists, policy makers, industry representatives and others – converged on the world's first industrial city to dis- cover and have discussions about the latest advancements in scien- rd th Manchester Central, venue of ESOF 2016 tific and technological researchFrom 23 to 27 July, 2016, Manchester flaunted its City of Science status as the host city of the across Europe and beyond. The seventhmain theme edition this of EuroScienceyear Laureates Open Forumand distinguished (ESOF 2016). Ascientists biennial inevent the held packed in a different was 'Science as Revolution', indicatingEuropean that city the every focus two of years,Exchange this time Hall it wasof Manchester Manchester's Central, turn to hostthe venuethis globally of the reputed the conference would be on how sciencescience andconference. technology conference. could transform life on the planet, revolutionise econo- The proceedings began with a string quartet render- mies, and help in overcoming challenges faced by global ing a piece of specially composed music.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Figures 2013
    Facts and Figures 201 3 Contents The University 2 World ranking 4 Academic pedigree 6 Areas of impact 8 Research power 10 Spin-outs 12 Income 14 Students 16 Graduate careers 18 Alumni 20 Faculties and Schools 22 Staff 24 Estates investment 26 Visitor attractions 28 Widening participation 30 At a glance 32 1 The University of Manchester Our Strategic Vision 2020 states our mission: “By 2020, The University of Manchester will be one of the top 25 research universities in the world, where all students enjoy a rewarding educational and wider experience; known worldwide as a place where the highest academic values and educational innovation are cherished; where research prospers and makes a real difference; and where the fruits of scholarship resonate throughout society.” Our core goals 1 World-class research 2 Outstanding learning and student experience 3 Social responsibility 2 3 World ranking The quality of our teaching and the impact of our research are the cornerstones of our success. 5 The Shanghai Jiao Tong University UK Academic Ranking of World ranking Universities assesses the best teaching and research universities, and in 2012 we were ranked 40th in the world. 7 World European UK European Year Ranking Ranking Ranking ranking 2012 40 7 5 2010 44 9 5 2005 53 12 6 2004* 78* 24* 9* 40 Source: 2012 Shanghai Jiao Tong University World Academic Ranking of World Universities ranking *2004 ranking refers to the Victoria University of Manchester prior to the merger with UMIST. 4 5 Academic pedigree Nobel laureates 1900 JJ Thomson , Physics (1906) We attract the highest calibre researchers and Ernest Rutherford , Chemistry (1908) teachers, boasting 25 Nobel Prize winners among 1910 William Lawrence Bragg , Physics (1915) current and former staff and students.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Reviving Russian Science and Academia
    TATIANA GOUNKO 9. REVIVING RUSSIAN SCIENCE AND ACADEMIA In October 2010, the Royal Swedish Academy of Science announced the laureates of the Nobel Prize in physics. Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov jointly received this award for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material called graphene, which, according to science experts, will have a wide range of practical applications in the future. The research duo has been working together for over a decade. Born in 1974, Dr. Novoselov is the youngest scientist to be awarded the prestigious Nobel Prize since 1973. He first worked as a Ph.D. student with Dr. Andre Geim in the Netherlands and subsequently joined him in the United Kingdom. Both scientists are currently conducting their research at the University of Manchester. Needless to say, the University of Manchester administration expressed its delight with the news by calling the prize “a truly tremendous achievement” and “a testimony to the quality of research that is being carried out in Physics and more broadly across the University” (University of Manchester, 2010, p. 1). Most of the press releases and on-line publications devoted to the prize-winning duo briefly mentioned that Drs. Geim and Novoselov were Russian-trained researchers. Dr. Geim, who had received his doctorate at the age of 29 and worked for a number of years as a researcher at the Institute for Microelectronics Technology in Chernogolovka (Russia), left the country in 1994 to continue his research career in the Netherlands and later in the United Kingdom. Dr. Novoselov graduated from the Moscow Physical-Technical University in 1997 and joined Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus
    ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 IARJSET ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 5, Issue 10, October 2018 The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus Dr.(Prof.) V.C.A NAIR* Educational Physicist, Research Guide for Physics at Shri J.J.T. University, Rajasthan-333001, India. *[email protected] Abstract: The Research Paper consists mainly of the birth dates of scientists and philosophers Before Christ (BC) and After Death (AD) starting from Thales of Miletus with a brief description of their work and contribution to the development of Physics. The author has taken up some 400 odd scientists and put them in a chronological order. Nobel laureates are considered separately in the same paper. Along with the names of researchers are included few of the scientific events of importance. The entire chain forms a cascade and a ready reference for the reader. The graph at the end shows the recession in the earlier centuries and its transition to renaissance after the 12th century to the present. Keywords: As the contents of the paper mainly consists of names of scientists, the key words are many and hence the same is not given I. INTRODUCTION As the material for the topic is not readily available, it is taken from various sources and the collection and compiling is a Herculean task running into some 20 pages. It is given in 3 parts, Part I, Part II and Part III. In Part I the years are given in Chronological order as per the year of birth of the scientist and accordingly the serial number.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Modern Physics and Astrophysics
    Highlights of Modern Physics and Astrophysics How to find the “Top Ten” in Physics & Astrophysics? - List of Nobel Laureates in Physics - Other prizes? Templeton prize, … - Top Citation Rankings of Publication Search Engines - Science News … - ... Nobel Laureates in Physics Year Names Achievement 2020 Sir Roger Penrose "for the discovery that black hole formation is a robust prediction of the general theory of relativity" Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez "for the discovery of a supermassive compact object at the centre of our galaxy" 2019 James Peebles "for theoretical discoveries in physical cosmology" Michel Mayor, Didier Queloz "for the discovery of an exoplanet orbiting a solar-type star" 2018 Arthur Ashkin "for groundbreaking inventions in the field of laser physics", in particular "for the optical tweezers and their application to Gerard Mourou, Donna Strickland biological systems" "for groundbreaking inventions in the field of laser physics", in particular "for their method of generating high-intensity, ultra-short optical pulses" Nobel Laureates in Physics Year Names Achievement 2017 Rainer Weiss "for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the Kip Thorne, Barry Barish observation of gravitational waves" 2016 David J. Thouless, "for theoretical discoveries of topological phase transitions F. Duncan M. Haldane, and topological phases of matter" John M. Kosterlitz 2015 Takaaki Kajita, "for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that Arthur B. MsDonald neutrinos have mass" 2014 Isamu Akasaki, "for the invention of
    [Show full text]
  • Graphene Is a Form of Carbon
    THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS 2010 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC – the perfect atomic lattice A thin fake of ordinary carbon, just one atom thick, lies behind this year’s Nobel Prize in Physics. Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov have shown that carbon in such a fat form has exceptional properties that originate from the remarkable world of quantum physics. Graphene is a form of carbon. As a material it is completely new – not only the thinnest ever but also the strongest. As a conductor of electricity it performs as well as copper. As a conductor of heat it outperforms all other known materials. It is almost completely transparent, yet so dense that not even helium, the smallest gas atom, can pass through it. Jannik Meyer, Science vol 324, 15 May 2009 vol Science Jannik Meyer, Figure 1. Graphene. The almost perfect web is only one atom thick. It consists of carbon atoms joined together in a hexagonal pattern similar to chicken wire. Consequently, the article on graphene published in Science in October 2004 stirred up a lot of commotion all around the world. On the one hand, graphene’s exotic properties enable scientists to test the theoretical foundations of physics. On the other hand, a vast variety of practical applications now appear to be possible including the creation of new materials and the manufacture of innovative electronics. Carbon, the basis of all known life on earth, has surprised us once again. Nobel Prize® is a registered trademark of the Nobel Foundation. of the Nobel Foundation. trademark Nobel Prize® is a registered Pencil, paper and sticky tape It could not have been easier to obtain graphene, the miraculous material that comes from ordinary graphite such as is found in pencils.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates Published In
    Nobel Laureates Published in Science has published the research of over 400 Laureates since the award’s inception in 1901! Award categories include Chemistry, Physics, and Medicine. Listed here are prize-winning authors from 1990 to the present, with the number of articles each Laureate published in Science. MEDICINE Articles CHEMISTRY Articles PHYSICS Articles 2015 2016 2014 William C. Campbell . 2 Ben Feringa —Netherlands........................5 Shuji Namakura—Japan .......................... 1 J. Fraser Stoddart—UK . 7 2014 2012 John O’Keefe—US...................................3 2015 Serge Haroche—France . 1 May-Britt Moser—Norway .......................11 Tomas Lindahl—US .................................4 David J. Wineland—US ............................12 Edvard I. Moser—Norway ........................11 Paul Modrich—US...................................4 Aziz Sancar—US.....................................7 2011 2013 Saul Perlmutter—US ............................... 1 2014 James E. Rothman—US ......................... 10 Brian P. Schmidt—US/Australia ................. 1 Eric Betzig—US ......................................9 Randy Schekman—US.............................5 Stefan W. Hell—Germany..........................6 2010 Thomas C. Südhof—Germany ..................13 William E. Moerner—US ...........................5 Andre Geim—Russia/UK..........................6 2012 Konstantin Novoselov—Russia/UK ............5 2013 Sir John B. Gurdon—UK . 1 Martin Karplas—Austria...........................4 2007 Shinya Yamanaka—Japan.........................3
    [Show full text]
  • On the 2011 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Awarded to Dan Shechtman
    DISTINGUISHED LECTURES CONTRIBUTIONS to SCIENCE 9 (2013) 17-23 Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona, Catalonia doi: 10.2436/20.7010.01.159 ISSN: 1575-6343 www.cat-science.cat OPENA ACCESS The Nobel Prizes of 2011 Crystallography and the Nobel Prizes: On the 2011 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, awarded to Dan Shechtman Joan F. Piniella Department of Geology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia Based on the lecture given by the Summary. Crystallography has a considerable presence among Nobel Prize laureates. In- author at the IEC, Barcelona, on 13 deed, 48 of them have close links to crystallography. The 2011 Nobel Prize in Chemistry December 2011 for the Nobel Prizes was awarded to Dan Shechtman for his discovery of quasicrystals. In addition to the scien- of 2011 Sessions. tific merit of the work, the Prize is a personal recognition of Dan Shechtman, whose ideas Correspondence: were initially rejected by the international scientific community. Yet, reason prevailed in the Departament de Geologia end, supported by arguments that arrived from seemingly unrelated directions, such as the Facultat de Ciències Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona study of Arab building tiles and the mathematical concept of tessellation. Concepts of a 08193 Bellaterra, Catalonia more crystallographic nature, such as twinned crystals and modulated and incommensu- Tel. +34-935813088 rate crystal structures, also played an important role. Finally, in 1992, the International Fax +34-935811263 Union of Crystallography modified the definition of “crystal” to include quasicrystals. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 24.10.13 Keywords: crystal structure · electron diffraction · quasicrystals · tessellations Accepted: 25.11.13 Resum.
    [Show full text]
  • Project 4.8-A Thin Films of Heusler Compounds with High Spin-Orbit Coupling
    Topology – from the materials perspective Claudia FELSER Co-workers in Dresden and elsewhere Andrei Bernevig, Princeton, CNR Rao, Bangalore, India Uli Zeitler, et al. HFML - EMFL, Nijmegen; J. Wosnitza et al., HFML Rossendorf Yulin Chen et al., Oxford; Günter Reiss, Bielfeld S.C.Zhang et al. and A. Kapitulnik, Stanford S. S. P. Parkin et al., IBM Almaden, MPI Halle Topological Insulators Topology Topology in Chemistry Molecules with different chiralities can have different physical and chemical properties π-electrons of aromatic molecules Hückel: Möbius 4n+2 aromatic 4n aromatic 4n antiaromatic 4n+2 antiaromatic Particles – Universe –Condensed matter Quantum field theory – Berry phase Dirac Higgs Weyl Majorana Cd3As2 YMnO3 TaAs YPtBi Guido Kreiner Lichtenberg Spaldin Vicky Süss, Marcus Schmidt Chandra Shekhar Family of quantum Hall effects 1985 S Oh Science 340 (2013) 153 Klaus von Klitzing 2016 1998 David Thouless, Duncan Haldane und Michael Kosterlitz Horst Ludwig Störmer and Daniel Tsui 2010 Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov Trivial and topological insulators Trivial semiconductor Topological Insulator Topological Insulator CdS Without spin orbit coupling Withspin orbit coupling M. C. Escher First success - - 3D: Dirac cone on the surface - 2D: Dirac cone in quantum well + Bernevig,et al., Science 314, 1757 (2006) Bernevig, S.C. Zhang, PRL 96, 106802 (2006) König, et al. Science 318, 766 (2007) Theory and experiment 3D topological insulators Bi-Sb alloy Bi2Se3 and relatives Moore and Balents, PRB 75, 121306(R) (2007) Fu and Kane, PRB 76, 045302 (2007) Murakami, New J. Phys. 9, 356 (2007) Hsieh, et al., Science 323, 919 (2009) Xia, et al., Nature Phys.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiral Anomaly Ky Kx
    Topological Materials Claudia Felser the revolution • Non-trivial Phenomena captured by Single-Particle Picture → predictive design of novel materials and functionalities • Novel Transport Phenomena determined by Global Properties • quantized transport from topological protection • giant responses … • Vision: • Quantum effects at room temperature, spintronics • Catalysis, energy conversion • … How does a materials scientist find topological materials? outline • Introduction • Topological insulators • Weyl semimetals – broken symmetry • Magnetic Weyl semimetals • New Fermions • Outlook – axion insultors and beyond outline • Introduction • Topological insulators • Weyl semimetals – broken symmetry • Magnetic Weyl semimetals • New Fermions • Outlook – axion insultors and beyond the predictions © Nature http://topologicalquantumchemistry.org/ the concept predictive materials Topological quantum chemistry design Bradlyn, et al., Nature 2017 1807.10271, 1807.08756 © Nature new concepts control/ for topological Lian, et al., PNAS 2018 synthesis functionality classes: magnetic correlated higher order … verification of emergent electronic phenomena structure Qi et al. Nat. Com. (2016) Liu et al. Nat. Mat. (2016) the materials •explorative search for new materials & predictive design •high quality single crystal growth •epitaxial growth of ultrathin films and heterostructures •2D materials and micro/nano structures Co2MnGa MgO the materials •explorative search for new materials & predictive design •high quality single crystal growth •epitaxial growth
    [Show full text]