DOCSLIB.ORG

Welcome Back, WHAP! Here's What You Need to Know

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Welcome Back, WHAP! Here's What You Need to Know Welcome back, WHAP! Here’s what you need to know. ● Your Ch. 12 Skills Activity is due TODAY. Have this on your desk. ● Your Period 3 Review is due THURSDAY. This will count as two daily grades. Give specific examples. Pick this up on the side table if you didn’t get it on Friday 11/17. ● The Period 3 Exam is on THURSDAY. This will consist of 30 stimulus-based multiple choice questions and one SAQ. Content will be from Chapters 7-12. ● You will have a Period 3 LEQ on FRIDAY. You will be expected to complete some brief planning prior to writing your LEQ in class. ● The Period 3 Maps are due NEXT MONDAY (December 4th). Note: This is a change from the original date. Instructions are on the website. Pick this up on the side table if you didn’t get it on Friday 11/17. *We will be reading through Ch. 13 next week. This will be the last chapter we will finish before Christmas break (we’ll start with Ch. 14 when we return) Today’s Agenda: ● Australia ● Oceania ● North American native societies ● Compare Aztec and Inca empires Australia ● Native groups (Aborigines) continued hunting and gathering lifestyle ● Native groups traded amongst each other ● Firestick farming- set fires to make hunting easier, encourage the growth of certain plants ● Dreamtime- oral tradition of storytelling Austronesian Migrations Polynesian Migrations ● Last major wave of human colonization of new areas ● Used outrigger canoes ● Used understanding of the stars and ocean currents to navigate (wayfinding) ● Established chiefdoms ● Brought crops and domesticated animals (including pigs, chickens, taro, and sweet potato) Outrigger canoe for oceanic voyaging Polynesian migrations sometimes resulted in deforestation and the extinction of large flightless birds, such as the moa of New Zealand (Aotearoa) Western North American native societies ● Unlike Mesoamerica and S. America- no empires ● Societies formed in response to their environments: ○ Pacific NW: Rich in resources (sea, forests)= settled villages. Social classes formed. Sometimes hunted whales in canoes. Used totems to identify ○ Southwest: Influence from Mesoamerica- used pottery instead of baskets; used irrigation to plant corn, squash, and beans. Anasazi had cliff dwellings- lived in pueblos (villages of apartment-style housing). Had partially underground ceremonial chambers called kivas. ○ Plains: Nomadic; hunted bison. Tribes included Kiowa, Comanche, Apache. Totems were used to identify tribes or groups. An Anasazi pueblo- Mesa Verde, Colorado An Anasazi kiva- underground ceremonial chamber Eastern North American native societies ● Unlike Mesoamerica and S. America- no empires ● Societies formed in response to their environments: ○ Eastern Woodlands (East of the Mississippi River): Mound building cultures- the latest of which was the Mississippian culture. Mounds were used for burials or other religious purposes. Created villages based on farming and trade. Cahokia was the most important city and center of trade. Rivers enabled long-distance trade. ○ Northeast: Woodland tribes clashed over land. Sometimes formed alliances, such as the Iroquois Confederation, to protect native lands. Iroquois were matrilineal, and women controlled the food supply. Cahokia: Then and now With your group, share what you found for the Aztec and Inca. How were they similar? How were they different? AZTEC INCA AZTEC AND INCA: SIMILARITIES ● Both were powerful empires ● Both were inspired by civilizations that came before them ● Both were polytheistic (gods mainly based on nature) ● Both had priests perform rituals ● Both made offerings (including sacrifices) to their gods ● Both had monumental architecture, public works, and infrastructure ● Both had absolute rulers (centralized government) and a way to consolidate the empire ● Both had a calendar system that was largely based on religion ● Both engaged in trade ● Both modified their environments ● Both were based on agriculture (including maize) ● Both had a magnificent capital city that housed the central government ● Both let local rulers maintain control of their local areas as long as they were loyal to the emperor ● Both had armies that helped expand territory ● Both took over other societies (conquered people) ● Both demanded tribute from conquered peoples ● Both had similar social structures (rulers/priests, then merchants/skilled workers, then peasants) ● Both were invaded and conquered by the Spanish in the 16th century when they were weakened AZTECS ● Mesoamerica- Valley of Mexico ● Preceded by Olmec, Zapotec, Teotihuacan, and Toltecs ● Toltecs were very warlike, worshipped a war god who demanded blood and human sacrifice. Later a Toltec ruler (Topiltzin) tried to convince people to stop human sacrifice- worship the feathered serpent god Quetzalcoatl instead. Worshippers of the war god rebelled- forced Topiltzin and his followers to the Yucatan Peninsula, where they influenced the late Mayan culture. Quetzalcoatl Fun Fact According to Aztec legend, the god of war and of the sun, Huitzilopochtli, said to establish a city where an eagle is found perched on a cactus holding a snake in its mouth. The Aztecs established their capital at Tenochtitlan. This is Mexico City today. AZTECS ● Started by the Mexica people, who entered the Valley of Mexico from the north around 1200 ● Allied with two other states- Texcoco and Tlacopan to form the Triple Alliance- established control over the Valley of Mexico ● Much more aggressive in conquest than the Inca- why? ● Performed human sacrifices at a much higher rate than Maya or Inca ● The Aztec state had looser control of the empire- allowed a private merchant class (pochteca) ● Very harsh treatment of conquered peoples ● Official language was Nahuatl- had a system of writing (glyphs) ● Interaction w/ the environment: Tenochtitlan built on an island in Lake Texcoco- built causeways (raised roads) over water and marshland; also had chinampas (floating gardens) used as farm plots Aztec chinampas Tenochtitlan (showing causeways and canoe transport) The Aztec performed human sacrifices on a massive scale. Why? INCA ● South America- Andes ● Capital was Cuzco ● Preceded by Chavin, Moche, Nazca, Huari, Tiahuanaco, and Chimu ● Ruler was seen as being descended from the sun god Inti ● 1438- Pachacuti began extending the empire throughout the Andes ● Used force only when necessary- allowed an “honorable surrender” before attacking; even if force was used, were careful to earn loyalty ● Much less human sacrifice than the Aztecs, though rituals still important ● Empire was highly centralized and consolidated- divided into 80 provinces reporting back to Cuzco ● Road network established with guest houses and chasquis (runners who would deliver messages) ● Modified the environment by creating terraces in the hillsides and also waru waru agriculture Cuzco- the capital of the Inca Empire Machu Picchu- the “lost city” of the Incas Inca roads Terracing Waru waru agriculture INCA ● The state had tight control over the economy- controlled the production and distribution of goods ● Incan society organized into a form of community cooperation called ayllu (extended family group)- did tasks too big for a family such as building irrigation canals and digging terraces- families organized into groups of 100, 1000, and 10,000- each had a chief that reported back to Cuzco ● Mit’a system- forced labor- every able-bodied citizen had to contribute a certain number of days of labor for the state. Did not have slavery, unlike the Aztec. In return, the state provided for the people in old age and provided food during shortages ● Unlike the Aztec, no system of writing- used the quipu (series of knotted cords primarily used for accounting). ● Official language was Quechua- established schools to teach Incan ways quipu INCA ● Full-time religious assistants called mamakuna (“Virgins of the Sun”)- women; yamacuna- young men- worked for the state and participated in religious activities. ● Practiced mummification to preserve the body in the afterlife- mummies were seen as sacred and were put on public display. Incan mummy Closing Activity How were the Aztecs and Inca similar to the Maya? How were they different from the Maya? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Diffusion of Maize to the Southwestern United States and Its Impact
    PERSPECTIVE The diffusion of maize to the southwestern United States and its impact William L. Merrilla, Robert J. Hardb,1, Jonathan B. Mabryc, Gayle J. Fritzd, Karen R. Adamse, John R. Roneyf, and A. C. MacWilliamsg aDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37102, Washington, DC 20013-7012; bDepartment of Anthropology, One UTSA Circle, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249; cHistoric Preservation Office, City of Tucson, P.O. Box 27210, Tucson, AZ 85726; dDepartment of Anthropology, Campus Box 1114, One Brookings Drive, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; eCrow Canyon Archaeological Center, 23390 Road K, Cortez, CO 81321; fColinas Cultural Resource Consulting, 6100 North 4th Street, Private Mailbox #300, Albuquerque, NM 87107; and gDepartment of Archaeology, 2500 University Drive Northwest, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 Edited by Linda S. Cordell, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, and approved October 30, 2009 (received for review June 22, 2009) Our understanding of the initial period of agriculture in the southwestern United States has been transformed by recent discoveries that establish the presence of maize there by 2100 cal. B.C. (calibrated calendrical years before the Christian era) and document the processes by which it was integrated into local foraging economies. Here we review archaeological, paleoecological, linguistic, and genetic data to evaluate the hypothesis that Proto-Uto-Aztecan (PUA) farmers migrating from a homeland in Mesoamerica intro- duced maize agriculture to the region. We conclude that this hypothesis is untenable and that the available data indicate instead a Great Basin homeland for the PUA, the breakup of this speech community into northern and southern divisions Ϸ6900 cal.
    [Show full text]
  • Inca Civilization 1425 A.D - 1532 A.D
    Inca Civilization 1425 A.D - 1532 A.D The Inca first appeared in the Andes region during the 12th century A.D. and gradually built a massive kingdom through the military strength of their emperors. Known as Tawantinsuyu, the Incan empire spanned the distance of northern Ecuador to central Chile and consisted of 12 million inhabitants from more than 100 different ethnic (cultural) groups at its peak. Well-devised agricultural and roadway systems, along with a centralized religion and language, helped maintain a cohesive (solid) state. Despite their power, the Inca were quickly overwhelmed by the diseases and superior weaponry of Spanish invaders, the last bastion of their immense empire overtaken in 1572. The Inca first appeared in what is today southeastern Peru during the 12th century A.D (1100’s). According to some versions of their origin myths, they were created by the sun god, Inti, who sent his son Manco Capac to Earth through the middle of three caves in the village of Paccari Tampu. After killing his brothers, Manco Capac led his sisters and their followers through the wilderness before settling in the fertile valley near Cusco circa 1200. The expanding reach of the Inca state, lead to the need for information and people to travel quickly throughout the empire. Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui is believed to have been the first Inca emperor to order forced resettlement to squash the possibility of an uprising from one ethnic (cultural) group. In addition, he established the practice in which rulers were prevented from inheriting the possessions of their fathers, thereby making sure that new leaders would conquer new lands and accumulate new wealth of their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Spanish Colonization—Latin America and the Philippines
    Title: Comparison of Spanish Colonization—Latin America and the Philippines Teacher: Anne Sharkey, Huntley High School Summary: This lesson took part as a comparison of the different aspects of the Spanish maritime empires with a comparison of Spanish colonization of Mexico & Cuba to that of the Philippines. The lessons in this unit begin with a basic understanding of each land based empire of the time period 1450-1750 (Russia, Ottomans, China) and then with a movement to the maritime transoceanic empires (Spain, Portugal, France, Britain). This lesson will come after the students already have been introduced to the Spanish colonial empire and the Spanish trade systems through the Atlantic and Pacific. Through this lesson the students will gain an understanding of Spanish systems of colonial rule and control of the peoples and the territories. The evaluation of causes of actions of the Spanish, reactions to native populations, and consequences of Spanish involvement will be discussed with the direct correlation between the social systems and structures created, the influence of the Christian missionaries, the rebellions and conflicts with native populations between the two locations in the Latin American Spanish colonies and the Philippines. Level: High School Content Area: AP World History, World History, Global Studies Duration: Lesson Objectives: Students will be able to: Compare the economic, political, social, and cultural structures of the Spanish involvement in Latin America with the Spanish involvement with the Philippines Compare the effects of mercantilism on Latin America and the Philippines Evaluate the role of the encomienda and hacienda system on both regions Evaluate the influence of the silver trade on the economies of both regions Analyze the creation of a colonial society through the development of social classes—Peninsulares, creoles, mestizos, mulattos, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle School Bee Final Round Regulation Questions
    IHBB European Championships Bee 2018-2019 Bee Final Round Middle School Bee Final Round Regulation Questions (1) One man who held this position was killed in the 10.26 incident by the director of the KCIA. That man’s daughter later became the first woman to hold this position until she was impeached in 2016. The first man to hold this position led his country through a conflict with a northern neighbor and was named Syngman Rhee. Park Chung Hee and Park Geun-Hye held, for the point, what position whose holders live in the Blue House in Seoul? ANSWER: President of South Korea (Accept President of the Republic of Korea, accept Daehan Minguk Daetongnyeong) (2) The state of Krajina [kry-ee-nah] failed to break away from this country, which secured its independence after winning the Battle of Drvar in Operation Storm. Franjo Tudman led this country to victory against Slobodan Milosevic’s forces, then pushed into Bosnia in 1995. For the point, name this country that gained its independence after the breakup of Yugoslavia and established its capital at Zagreb. ANSWER: Croatia (3) After the battle, the loser was given an alcoholic drink as a symbol that he would be spared, which he misinterpreted by passing the glass to his ally, Reynald of Chatillon. Five months after this battle, Baldwin IV routed the winner of this battle at Montgisard. This battle, which was named for an extinct volcano that had two peaks, allowed its winner to recapture Jerusalem later that year. For the point, name this 1187 battle where Saladin crushed the crusaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals and Sacred Mountains: How Ritualized Performances Materialized State-Ideologies at Teotihuacan, Mexico
    Animals and Sacred Mountains: How Ritualized Performances Materialized State-Ideologies at Teotihuacan, Mexico The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Sugiyama, Nawa. 2014. Animals and Sacred Mountains: How Citation Ritualized Performances Materialized State-Ideologies at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Accessed April 17, 2018 4:59:24 PM EDT Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12274541 This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH Terms of Use repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA (Article begins on next page) $QLPDOVDQG6DFUHG0RXQWDLQV +RZ5LWXDOL]HG3HUIRUPDQFHV0DWHULDOL]HG6WDWH,GHRORJLHVDW7HRWLKXDFDQ0H[LFR $'LVVHUWDWLRQ3UHVHQWHG %\ 1DZD6XJL\DPD WR 7KH'HSDUWPHQWRI$QWKURSRORJ\ LQSDUWLDOIXOILOOPHQWRIWKHUHTXLUHPHQWV IRUWKHGHJUHHRI 'RFWRURI3KLORVRSK\ LQWKHVXEMHFWRI $QWKURSRORJ\ +DUYDUG8QLYHUVLW\ &DPEULGJH0DVVDFKXVHWWV $SULO © 2014 Nawa Sugiyama $OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG 'LVVHUWDWLRQ$GYLVRUV3URIHVVRU:LOOLDP)DVKDQG5LFKDUG0HDGRZ 1DZD6XJL\DPD $QLPDOVDQG6DFUHG0RXQWDLQV +RZ5LWXDOL]HG3HUIRUPDQFHV0DWHULDOL]HG6WDWH,GHRORJLHVDW7HRWLKXDFDQ0H[LFR $%675$&7 +XPDQVKDYHDOZD\VEHHQIDVFLQDWHGE\ZLOGFDUQLYRUHV7KLVKDVOHGWRDXQLTXHLQWHUDFWLRQZLWK WKHVHEHDVWVRQHLQZKLFKWKHVHNH\ILJXUHVSOD\HGDQLPSRUWDQWUROHDVPDLQLFRQVLQVWDWHLPSHULDOLVP
    [Show full text]
  • Machc19-05.4
    19th Meeting of the MesoAmerica – Caribbean Sea Hydrographic Commission Regional Capacity Building Update of Brazil on its Regional Project International Hydrographic Organization Organisation Hydrographique Internationale Capacity Building in the Caribbean, South America and Africa - Hydrography Courses Brazil/DHN has been expanding its Capacity Building Project towards other countries in the Amazon region and in the Atlantic Ocean basin. COURSE DESCRIPTION DURATION C-Esp-HN Technician in Hydrography and Navigation (Basic Training) 42 weeks C-Ap-HN Technician in Hydrography and Navigation (IHO Cat. “B”) 35 weeks CAHO Hydrographic Surveyors (IHO Cat. “A”) 50 weeks 2018 – 1 Bolivian Navy Officer (IHO Cat “A”). 2019 – Confirmed: 2 students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (IHO Cat “A”). Confirmation in progress: Angola (6), Mozambique (4), Bolivia (1), Colombia (1) and Paraguay (1) (IHO Cat “A” and “B”). 2020 – In the near future, Fluminense Federal University (UFF) and other Brazilian universities and governmental institutions in cooperation with DHN will develop a Hydrography Program and a Nautical Cartography Program. International Hydrographic Organization Organisation Hydrographique Internationale 2 Capacity Building - IHO Sponsored Trainings/Courses Work Program Training/Course Date 2018 Maritime Safety Information (MSI) Training Course 16-18 October 18 participants from 12 different countries Argentina (2) Brazil (6) Bolivia (1) Colombia (1) Ecuador (1) El Salvador (1) Guyana (1) Liberia (1) Paraguay (1) Peru (1) Uruguay (1)
    [Show full text]
  • A Glance at Member Countries of the Mesoamerica Integration and Development Project, (LC/MEX/TS.2019/12), Mexico City, 2019
    Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Administration and Analysis of Programmes Hugo Eduardo Beteta Director ECLAC Subregional Headquarters in Mexico This document was prepared by Leda Peralta Quesada, Associate Economic Affairs Officer, International Trade and Industry Unit, ECLAC Subregional Headquarters in Mexico, under the supervision of Jorge Mario Martínez Piva, and with contributions from Martha Cordero Sánchez, Olaf de Groot, Elsa Gutiérrez, José Manuel Iraheta, Lauren Juskelis, Julie Lennox, Debora Ley, Jaime Olivares, Juan Pérez Gabriel, Diana Ramírez Soto, Manuel Eugenio Rojas Navarrete, Eugenio Torijano Navarro, Víctor Hugo Ventura Ruiz, officials of ECLAC Mexico, as well as Gabriel Pérez and Ricardo Sánchez, officials of ECLAC Santiago. The comments of the Presidential Commissioners-designate and the Executive Directorate of the Mesoamerica Integration and Development Project are gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and may not be those of the Organization. This document is an unofficial translation of an original that did not undergo formal editorial review. The boundaries and names shown on the maps in this document do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Explanatory notes: - The dot (.) is used to separate the decimals and the comma (,) to separate the thousands in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Presentación. 2.Fundamentación
    1 UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES HISTORICO-SOCIALES INTRODUCCION A MESOMERICA Y NUEVOS DESCUBRIMIENTOS PROFR. DR. PEDRO JIMENEZ LARA I.I.H-S 1. Presentación. El presente curso pretende ofrecer una visión de los elementos y períodos culturales que identifican al México Antiguo. Las regiones son: oasisamérica, aridoamérica y mesoamérica Los horizontes que la componen son: arqueolítico, cenolítico inferior, cenolítico superior, protoneolítico, oasisamérica, aridoamérica, mesoamérica y los primeros contactos en el s. XVI: Planteamiento que se hace de esta manera para una mejor comprensión del curso y entender la evolución de los grupos asentados en territorio mexicano. 2.Fundamentación. Las área culturales del México Antiguo no solo se reduce a Mesoamérica como el período de máximo florecimiento que le antecedió a la conquista. En otros tiempos, antes de conocerse esta macroárea cultural, llegaron diversos grupos de cazadores-recolectores nómadas. El proceso evolutivo de estos grupos fue largo y lento, permitiendo avanzar e ir tocando diferentes niveles de desarrollo y los conocimientos necesarios para el cultivo y domesticación de las plantas como uno de los descubrimientos mas importantes durante esta fase que cambio el curso de la historia. Otra de las regiones es la llamada Oasisamérica localizada al sw de E.U. y norte de México, compuesta por grupos sedentarios agrícolas pero con una complejidad similar a la Mesoamericana. El área denominada mesoamérica, espacio donde interactuaron y se desarrollaron diversos grupos culturales, fue la “…sede de la mas alta civilización de la América precolombina. (Niederbeger, 11, 1996), se desarrollo en la mayor parte del territorio mexicano. Mesoamérica, definida así por Kirchhoff en 1943, es punto de referencia no solo para estudiosos del período prehispánico, en el convergen diversos especialistas amparados en diferentes corrientes ideológicas y enfoques: antropólogos, geógrafos prehistoriadores, historiadores, sociólogos, arquitectos, biólogos, sociólogos, por mencionar a algunos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Americas and Oceania Ben06937.Ch21 538-563.Qxd 8/9/07 3:36 PM Page 539
    ben06937.Ch21_538-563.qxd 8/9/07 3:36 PM Page 538 Worlds Apart: 21 The Americas and Oceania ben06937.Ch21_538-563.qxd 8/9/07 3:36 PM Page 539 States and Empires in Mesoamerica States and Empires in South America and North America The Coming of the Incas The Toltecs and the Mexica Inca Society and Religion Mexica Society Mexica Religion The Societies of Oceania Peoples and Societies of the North The Nomadic Foragers of Australia The Development of Pacific Island Societies In November 1519 a small Spanish army entered Tenochtitlan, capital city of the Aztec empire. The Spanish forces came in search of gold, and they had heard many reports about the wealth of the Aztec empire. Yet none of those reports prepared them adequately for what they saw. Years after the conquest of the Aztec empire, Bernal Díaz del Castillo, a soldier in the Span- ish army, described Tenochtitlan at its high point. The city itself sat in the water of Lake Tex- coco, connected to the surrounding land by three broad causeways, and as in Venice, canals allowed canoes to navigate to all parts of the city. The imperial palace included many large rooms and apartments. Its armory, well stocked with swords, lances, knives, bows, arrows, slings, armor, and shields, attracted Bernal Díaz’s professional attention. The aviary of Tenochti- tlan included eagles, hawks, parrots, and smaller birds in its collection, and jaguars, mountain lions, wolves, foxes, and rattlesnakes were noteworthy residents of the zoo. To Bernal Díaz the two most impressive sights were the markets and the temples of Te- nochtitlan.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Dynamics of Human Empires
    Quantitative Dynamics of Human Empires Cesare Marchetti and Jesse H. Ausubel FOREWORD Humans are territorial animals, and most wars are squabbles over territory. become global. And, incidentally, once a month they have their top managers A basic territorial instinct is imprinted in the limbic brain—or our “snake meet somewhere to refresh the hierarchy, although the formal motives are brain” as it is sometimes dubbed. This basic instinct is central to our daily life. to coordinate business and exchange experiences. The political machinery is Only external constraints can limit the greedy desire to bring more territory more viscous, and we may have to wait a couple more generations to see a under control. With the encouragement of Andrew Marshall, we thought it global empire. might be instructive to dig into the mechanisms of territoriality and their role The fact that the growth of an empire follows a single logistic equation in human history and the future. for hundreds of years suggests that the whole process is under the control In this report, we analyze twenty extreme examples of territoriality, of automatic mechanisms, much more than the whims of Genghis Khan namely empires. The empires grow logistically with time constants of tens to or Napoleon. The intuitions of Menenius Agrippa in ancient Rome and of hundreds of years, following a single equation. We discovered that the size of Thomas Hobbes in his Leviathan may, after all, be scientifically true. empires corresponds to a couple of weeks of travel from the capital to the rim We are grateful to Prof. Brunetto Chiarelli for encouraging publication using the fastest transportation system available.
    [Show full text]
  • Texto Completo (Pdf)
    LA FRONTERA CULTURAL MESO-ARIDOAMERICANA: CONSTRUCCIÓN DE IMAGINARIOS NACIONALISTAS EN LA HISTORIA MEXICANA MESO-ARIDOAMERICAN CULTURAL FRONTIER: CONSTRUCTION OF NATIONALIST IMAGINARIES IN MEXICAN HISTORY Adriana Gómez Aíza PhD en Análisis de Discurso por la Universidad de Essex. Profesora investigadora adscrita al Área Académica de Historia y Antropología, Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. [email protected] Sergio Sánchez Vázquez Doctor en Antropología por la Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia. Profesor investigador adscrito al Área Académica de Historia y Antropología, Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. [email protected] Nota. Una primera versión de este trabajo se presentó en la Memoria del VI Congreso de la Gran Chichimeca: 1-13. Instituto de Investigaciones Humanísticas, UASLP. México. 2007 Resumen La noción de frontera valida ciertas interpretaciones sobre la historia de una nación: lugar donde se nace y comparte con los demás una identidad, un modo de entenderse a sí mismo en relación con otros, con los que pertenecen a ese entorno y los que son ajenos o viven más allá de los confines que los dividen y separan. Aquí se discute la pertinencia de aplicar el término frontera cultural a la presunta división regional entre grupos sedentarios agrícolas mesoamericanos y grupos chichimecas seminómadas de los desiertos del actual norte de México. Para ello se aborda el papel jugado por Mesoamérica y la Gran Chichimeca en la conformación de imaginarios étnicos y nacionalistas, especialmente el nahua-centrismo impuesto por la conquista española, y la reivindicación del pasado prehispánico como constitutivo de la historia de México, enfatizando el contraste entre la reivindicación oficial del mestizaje a partir de la derrota militar de Tenochtitlán y la exégesis chicana que invoca su pasado en Aztlán, tierra mítica de origen de los mexicanos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Unraveling of the Incan Empire: the Importance of Fibers and Textiles of the Past
    University of Wisconsin–Superior McNair Scholars Journal, volume 2, 2001 The Spanish Unraveling Of the Incan Empire: The Importance of Fibers and Textiles of the Past Rhonda R. Dass, Art History William Morgan, M.F.A. Department of Visual Arts ABSTRACT Steeped in ancient traditions, modern day Peru can boast the continuation of cultural heritage dating back before 1000 BC. The coastal desert climate is perfect for the preservation of textiles long buried in the sacred graves of past peoples. From these artifacts we can see how important the textiles of the Incan culture were to its people. Some argue that internal strife was the main factor for the ease with which the Spaniards were able to conquer the advanced civilization of the Incas. Others argue that the empire was already in decline. Perhaps the textile– based economy of the Incan empire was the prime factor. History of the Incan Empire: Geographical and Political The area of South America, which once sustained the mighty Incan empire during the early half of the 10th millennium, is a diverse, breathtaking and often inhospitable land. As the Incans, led by Manco Capac, spread their empire across the South American continent they conquered numerous small tribes scattered throughout an awesome array of nature's wonders. They started their reign in the area surrounding Lake Titicaca, still considered a sacred place by their modern day ancestors, taking control of the local Tiwanaku peoples. From this region nestled in the Andes Mountains they battled their way across mountain ridges that draw a line down the coastal areas of South America.
    [Show full text]