Full Page Fax Print

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Full Page Fax Print ETHOS A Journal of research articles in management science and allied areas (refereed) Volume: 3 Number: 2 July-December 2010 Contents Research Articles NPVI and IRR : Criteria for Project Choice 1 Satya Prakash Singh, Puja Bhardwaj Implications of Trends in Expenditure of Government of 6 Maharashtra Prakash S. Kamble Assessment of Effectiveness of Customer Relationship 18 Management Tools for Supply Chain Management Of Auto-Comp Industries Yogesh D. Kulkarni , Anil R. Keskar A Critical Study of Human Resource Practices in Selected 27 Sugar Factories Annasaheb M. Gurav, Pralhad K. Mudalkar Students Absenteeism of B-School in Pune City : An 43 Empirical Study Manisha N. Paliwal Farmers Views on the Implementation of Environment - 54 Friendly for Grapes Production - A Survey Study in Sangli District Sunil S. Patil Investor's Preference for Mutual Fund Investment in 62 Kolhapur City Vaibhav J. Dhere, Bajirao R. Patil Case Study Together We Grow Better and Faster! 73 Girish P. Jakhotiya Bibliography Psychographic Segmentation 78 Priyanka S. Zanvar From the desk of editor It is a matter of sheer pleasure to place before you the second issue of third volume of Ethos, a refereed biannual Journal of research articles in management science and allied areas. In fact we are enjoying the growth and overwhelming response received from authors, contributors and subscribers. The journal is an effort to provide a platform for exploration and articulation of knowledge of academicians, researchers, students, entrepreneurs, executives and consultants. At ETHOS, we publish original papers in the form of research articles and case studies.. From last issue of Ethos two new sections had been introduced. One is of book review and another is of selected bibliography. Let me share one aspect very humbly that the quality of research papers is very poor as it is seen from rejection ratio. There is dire need of training to researchers for enriching the quality. The present issue of ETHOS carries seven research papers, one case study and one bibliography. Research papers are a blend of empirical research in the functional areas of management like Agricultural Management, Business Economics, Human Resource Development, and Financial Management. The paper of Satya Prakash Singh and Puja Bhardwaj peep into conflicting issue of using NPVI and IRR for project choice. The paper has examined issues of NPVI and IRR of 22 companies on which analysis is based on. The assessment of reforms led down by Government is also a responsibility of researcher. Prakash Kamble has contributed handsomely to this area of research. The article titled, ‘Implications of Trends in Expenditure of Government of Maharashtra’ concludes that expenditure of Government of Maharashtra has mainly concentrated on short term development and mainly social welfare promoting rather than economic development promoting aspect. Today’s scenario is of e-organization. The business models are changing at faster pace. Anil Keskar and Yogesh Kulkarni have focused on Supply Chain Management and Customer Relationship Management as their area of research to explore more applications of these two concepts in e-organization especially related to auto component industry. Annasaheb Gurav and Pralhad Mudalkar probe in critically of HRM practices in sugar factories. In an empirical study by Manisha Paliwal, reasons of student’s absenteeism in B- School have been explored. Sunil Patil has nicely come out with a survey article on grape growers in Sangli District of Maharashtra. The last technical paper of this issue talks on Investors Preference for Mutual Fund Investment in Kolhapur which may facilitates few tips to portfolio industry to advance on decision making by Vaibhav J. Dhere, Bajirao R. Patil. This issue of ETHOS carries Case Study titled, ‘Together We Grow Better and Faster!’ by Dr. Girish Jakhotia. Priyanka Zanvar has contributed bibliography on Psychographic Segmentation. I believe that the articles and case study contributed by esteemed academicians and scholars for this issue would be immensely readable and beneficial to academicians, research scholars and industrialists. I look forward to your valuable feedback to enable us enthrall readers and ensure kaizen. I also take this opportunity to wish you Happy New Year to all our subscribers, contributors, readers, scholars and authors and continue to seek your wholehearted support. Dr. B.S. Sawant Editor-in-Chief NPVI and IRR : Criteria for Project Choice Satya Prakash Singh, Puja Bhardwaj Abstract Do IRR (internal rate of return) and NPVI (net present value of Investment Criteria? lead to conflicting decisions in capital budgeting? Hypothetical examples have been constructed show that they might. A more relevant question is what happens in the case of real life projects. Do the two criteria give conflicting signals in case of accept/reject decision? Does the ranking of projects change when NPVI rather than IRR is used as a criterion for ranking? This paper tries to examine these issues in a real life setting of 22 projects of an Indian SIDC. The two yield identical conclusions in case of 'accept/reject' choice for all the projects. They rank the projects differently, however. The correlation between the ranks is found to be significantly high. , NPVI being absolute value and IRR a proportion, the comparison between the rankings is not quite appropriate. Therefore, benefit/cost (B/C) ratio is derived as an equivalent of NPVI criterion for accept/reject choice, and ranking on IRR is compared with that on B/C the correlation improves to almost unity Keywords: NPVI, IRR, Project, Cost Benefit Ratio. Introduction : There exist extensive empirical studies on use of One of the open issues in the theory of investment the capital budgeting criteria in practice: Which decision making has been the possibility of conflict criterion is more popular. Which criterion do users of ranking of projects based on IRR (internal rate and experts consider better. [See for example, of return) and NPVI (net present value of Brigham (1975), Gitman and Forrester (1977), investment) criteria. Hypothetical examples of Moore and Reichart (1983), Stanley and Block projects where IRR and NPVI yield conflicting (1984), Pandey (1989), Bierman(1993), Drury, rankings have been given. The conflict may arise due to size disparity, time disparity of cash flows, Braund and Tayles (1993), Petry and Sprow life disparity of projects, etc. [See for example, (1993), Gilbert and Reichart (1995), Jog and Van Horne (2000) , Brealey and Myres (2009)]. Srivastava (1995), Babu and Sharma (1995), It is pertinent, and of course more important than Cherukuri (1996), Chadwell-Hatfield, Goitein, showing logical possibilities of conflict of ranking Horvath and Webster (1997), Kester and Chang through hypothetical examples, to know what (1999), Parashar (1999), Graham and Harvey really happens to ranking of projects in practice (2001), and Anand (2002)].Yet, to the best of our when ranked on IRR and NPVI criteria. knowledge nobody has examined if the two Satya Prakash Singh criteria, NPVI and IRR would give conflicting ( Ph.D. ) ranking of projects in real life. Professor The present paper attempts to answer this question University Business School Panjab University on the basis of the real life data of 22 projects of a Chandigarh development financial institution of a state in India Puja Bhardwaj (SIDC). Section 1 sets the theoretical framework ( Ph.D.) for the empirical study. Section 1.1 defines the Assistant Professor NPVI and IRR criteria for choice in a compact Dr Vikhe Patil Foundation's Pravara Centre for fashion [See Singh and Deshpande (1995)]. One Management Research Development Pune of the problems of ranking on IRR and NPVI Identifying the Importance of Supply Chain Management... 1 E:ethos\5th issue\6\fp 26-12-2010 criteria highlighted in the literature is that IRR is t a proportion while NPVI is an absolute value. IRR Σ ( Bt - Ct ) = 0 ( 1 + p )t being a proportion is considered better criterion t = 0 for comparison across projects. For accept/reject ● See Appendix A decision, generally NPVI is most preferred. [See for example, Brealey and Myers (2009), Chapter Transforming NPVI into a Ratio: 5, UNIDO Guidelines (1972)]. It is appropriate NPVI can be easily transformed to a proportion to transform NPVI to a proportion to compare as is shown below: ranking on this criterion with the ranking on the t NPVI is greater than Σ ( Bt - Ct ) > 0. IRR criterion. Section 1.2 derives this proportion t zero if and only if t = 0 ( 1 + r ) named as Benefit/Cost (B/C) ratio. Also it is noted that although NPVI and B/C lead to same tt( B ) C ) conclusions as regards the 'yes-no' choice about a Or if and only if Σt >Σ t ( 1 + r )t ( 1 + r )t project, yet may lead to conflicting conclusions t = 0 t = 0 as regards ranking of projects. Section 2 is devoted tt Σ( Bt ) /Σ Ct ) to the empirical study. Section 2.1 describes the Or if and only if t t t = 0 ( 1 + r ) t = 0 ( 1 + r ) sample. Section 2.2 presents the analysis. Section tt 3 concludes the paper. Σ( Bt ) /Σ (Ct ) Expression ( 1 + r )t ( 1 + r )t The Theoretical Framework t = 0 t = 0 Definitions : is generally called benefit/cost (B/C) ratio. Consider a project. Define an expression It must be noted that although in case of 'yes-no' choice of a single project (B/C) and NPVI are t ( B - C ) Σ t t (1) equivalent criteria, the two criteria may not be ( 1 + r )t t = 0 equivalent in case of ranking across projects. The where point can be illustrated by an example. Suppose the present value of benefits of project X Bt is the benefit and Ct is the cost due to the project in period t, is 500, and of costs is 300. Suppose the present r is the appropriate uniform rate of discount for value of benefits of Y is 1000, and of costs is 700.
Recommended publications
  • JUNE 20, 2020 Vol LV No 25 ` 110
    JUNE 20, 2020 Vol LV No 25 ` 110 A SAMEEKSHA TRUST PUBLICATION www.epw.in EDITORIALS The Policymaker and Uncertainty NEET Undermines Constitutional Provisions An examination of why the response to COVID-19 Sensitivity, Not Sensationalism has been dramatically different across different countries when they all face the same level of FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK virologic uncertainty page 13 Critique Caught in a Deadlock LAW & SOCIETY Gandhi and the ‘Flu Pandemic’ Lawless Lawmaking in a COVID-19 World Why did Gandhi show such indifference to the pandemic when, given what is known about him, the opposite would COMMENTARY be expected? An analysis of his letters and statements Procedural Rationality in the Time of COVID-19 from that time tries to find the answer. page 34 Towards More Inclusive Water Management The Overseer of the Plague: Reading Oedipus Rex during COVID-19 Democratic Water Systems Neo-liberal Restoration at the Barrel of a Gun: Dissecting the Racist Coup in Bolivia A look at how the ideas of some critical sociological thinkers can contribute to a more inclusive management of Remembering A Vaidyanathan (1931–2020) our water resources and truly ensure water for all page 16 BOOK REVIEWS Experience, Caste and the Everyday Social A True Social Scientist War over Words: Censorship in India, 1930–1960 A Vaidyanathan’s research work in top institutions and PERSPECTIVES the Planning Commission was marked by attempts to seek answers to the question of development beyond Gandhi and the Pandemic ECONOMIC & POLITICAL WEEKLY disciplinary boundaries. page 25 SPECIAL ARTICLES Decoding Ayushman Bharat: A Political Economy Perspective Neo-liberalism Plays Out in Bolivia Farmer Suicides in Maharashtra, 2001–2018: The 2019 coup in the country confirms the common Trends across Marathwada and Vidarbha patterns of the instrumental use of religion in politics, racism and the aggressive implementation of neo-liberal CURRENT STATISTICS policies in the route to the right.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Development in Maharashtra Problems and Prospects
    Occasional Paper—7 Agricultural Development in Maharashtra Problems and Prospects Ms. S.D. SAWANT B.N. KULKARNI C.V. ACHUTHAN K.J.S . SATYASAI National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Mumbai Occasional Paper—7 Agricultural Development in Maharashtra Problems and Prospects Ms. S.D. SAWANT B.N. KULKARNI C.V. ACHUTHAN K.J.S . SATYASAI } \T/ National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Mumbai 1999 ( Published by National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Department of Economic Analysis and Research, Jeevan Seva Complex (Annexe), S.V. Road, Santacruz (W), Mumbai - 400 054 and Printed at Karnatak Orion Press, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001. Acknowledgement This occasional paper has been carved out of the research project untertaken by National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), Mumbai, in collaboration with the Department of Economics, University of Mumbai, Mumbai. In its completion we owe a deep debt of gratitude to officials of NABARD and University of Mumbai who were instrumental in initiating this first collaborative study between NABARD and Department of Economics. We must put on record our special gratitude to Shri N.T. Jadhav and Ms. Sandhya Mhatre of Mumbai University who assisted us sincerely and devotedly and also through excellent management of field work at the village level. We owe a special debt to Shri N.T. Patil (retired Manager, Central Bank of India, Mumbai) who agreed to participate in the project field survey. We are specially indebted to late Prof. M.L. Dantwala for his comments and suggestions on the crucial chapters of the study. We also appreciate valuable support extended by our colleagues from University of Mumbai and NABARD, Mumbai.
    [Show full text]
  • Maharashtra Economic Development Council
    VOL. II NO. : 2 October 2019 Pages 36 ` 80 ISSN 2581-995X POLITICAL ECONOMY OF MAHARASHTRA 24.97 CAGR=14.3% 22.57 19.87 17.81 16.5 14.6 12.8 GSDP of Maharashtra( Rs. Trillion) Source: Central Statistic Office, Socio Economic Survey of Maharashtra. 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 Because your love for your loved ones, is forever... MEDC Digest - Cover_FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY Inner Pages.indd 1 27-Apr-19 12:13:30 PM 2 October 2019 MEDC Economic Digest MEDC Governing Board MEDC President: From the President’s Desk Mr. Ravindra Boratkar Managing Director, MM Activ Sci - Tech Communications Dear Members, Pvt. Ltd. In many fields of socioeconomic endeavour, Maharashtra remains the undisputed torchbearer MEDC Vice Presidents : of the country. Many government initiatives like Mrs. Meenal Mohadikar Make in India and Magnetic Maharashtra have CEO, Anand Trade had a deep impact to the industrial growth of Development Service the state. Maharashtra has shown continuous and sustained increments in industrial production Mr. Chandrakant Sadadekar since independence. The state is also blessed Chairman, Sadadekar Global with a 720 km coastline which makes the harnessing of the blue economy Group Export-Import a viable proposition in the overall growth and development strategy of Maharashtra. Mr. Mukund Kulkarni Director, Expert Global Maharashtra plans to grow into a trillion dollar economy by 2024- Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 25, which will likely make it the first state economy of the country to achieve this distinction. That is eminently doable considering that much MEDC Immediate Past- of the policymaking by Maharashtra’s visionary leaders has largely laid Presidents: the groundwork for this transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Survey of Maharashtra 1998-99
    ECONOMIC SURVEY OF MAHARASHTRA 1998-99 ai«J ? (itiwHWJi, ECONOMIC SURVEY OF MAHARASHTRA 1998-99 NIEPA DC D10222 udiAiY i wmmmkrm mm- lostACtite of Sducatioo*) nail A4auistrati«n. i7*% Sri Aiitr*btii4o Matf, •••'•"rrrjii2jr=v . 5[T^rfW ^. W W 9R qr^n^f^TR T^^irrift^^T^ cT^ cb<«i^ld ^ 3T^ ^ qr ^ c m ^ 3TTt. H^ICF^ < l^ ^ l >3T2fcqci#^ tf^T ^ 5[^§HT^2TT w m H F M ^ ^ 07T^WcIT W ^ ^ J ^i^fer !?"ch7U|id ^ '3TTt. ^ O T ilf^ tTtM 5PT?^ ^ tooft 3T^m4t ^TTcfjtcnft < s ^ ant. 'Stf^ jttM ^§tt # jG r ^ $TTOfT '3#. Hl.RT.’TRl^ ^s{ ^ ^tlHcb f^*5H f^mPT f^HTGj *n^, 'i'K'K'K Hlc 4231—Aa PREFACE The Directorate of Economics and Statistics brinGs out a publication “ Economic Survey of Maharashtra ” every year. The present publication for the year 1998-99 is the 38th issue in the series and is prepared in combined form in Marathi and EnGlish. 2. The salient features of the State’s economy are given in Part-I and statistical tables are presented in Part-II of this issue. Graphs and charts are Given in respective chapters. 3. In attemptinG to Give up-to-date data in this publication, provisional fiGures have been included at some places and those are likely to be revised after final data become available. B.M.NaGrale Director of Economics & Statistics PlanninG Department Mumbai Mumbai, Dated 15th March, 1999 V CONTENTS PaGe No. SUBJECT |fe#TT?r ix Maharashtra at a glance xii Maharashtra’ s comparison with India HKdl^H TT^i^ ^ b1lf^<ib \^hv<^ xiv Selected socio-economic indicators of States in India ^ — ^w ^ PART I—SURVEY 1.
    [Show full text]
  • District-Driven Growth a Pilot Study for Making India
    FINAL DISTRICT-DRIVEN GROWTH A PILOT STUDY FOR MAKING INDIA A $5 TRILLION ECONOMY REPORT FOR RATNAGIRI DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY: NATIONAL COUNCIL OF APPLIED ECONOMIC RESEARCH JANUARY, 2019 NCAER DIPP District Driven Growth Pilot Study Ratnagiri ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The NCAER study team would like to thank the officials of DIPP and MoCI for their support and guidance through the course of the study. At DIPP, we are thankful to Mr. Anand S. Bhal, Senior Economic Adviser for his suggestions and cooperation. Our special thanks to his team members, particularly Mr. Sandip Kote, Ms. Kokila Jayaram and Ms. Supriya Malik for their support and for connecting us with the district officials. At MoCI, the team had a privilege to interact with the Hon. Minister, Mr. Suresh Prabhu and get his valuable insights on the scope of the study. His officials, particularly Mr. Digvijay Sujlana and Mr. Abheet Dwivedi, have been a wonderful support in all aspects of the study, especially in arranging meetings with the officials from the district and state capital departments. The team benefitted immensely from the insightful meetings with the district stakeholders. The team would like to express its gratitude to the District Collector and District Magistrate, Mr. Sunil Chavan, IAS, for having discussions with us on the district potential areas. We had rounds of extensive discussions – with Chief Executive Officer, Additional Chief Executive Officer, District Statistical Office, Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board, Ratnagiri Zonal office: Bank of India (Lead Bank of the district), Associate Dean of College of Fisheries, Assistant Commissioner of Fisheries Department, District Industries Center, District Superintendent Agriculture Officer and District Planning Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover New.Pmd
    C M Y K Red Herring Prospectus Dated September 20, 2006 Please read Section 60B of the Companies Act, 1956 100% Book Building Issue Development Credit Bank Limited (Being a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and a banking company within the meaning of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 pursuant to its conversion from Development Co-operative Bank Limited, a co-operative bank, to a joint stock banking company on May 31, 1995.) Registered Office: 154, S.V.Patel Road (East), Dongri. Mumbai – 400 009, Telephone: 91-22-2289 9999; Fax: 91-22-2287 6112 Corporate Office: 204, Raheja Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021, Telephone: 91-22- 2287 2465, Fax: 91-22- 2287 6112 Contact Person: Mr H.V Barve, Email: [email protected], Website: www.dcbl.com PUBLIC ISSUE OF 71,500,000 EQUITY SHARES OF RS. 10 EACH FOR CASH AT A PRICE OF RS. [] PER EQUITY SHARE AGGREGATING RS. [] MILLION BY DEVELOPMENT CREDIT BANK LIMITED (THE “BANK” OR “ISSUER”) (THE “ISSUE”). THE ISSUE COMPRISES A NET ISSUE TO THE PUBLIC OF UP TO 68,997,500 EQUITY SHARES OF RS. 10 EACH (THE “NET ISSUE”) AGGREGATING RS. [] MILLION AND A RESERVATION FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF 2,502,500 EQUITY SHARES OF RS. 10 EACH AGGREGATING RS. [] MILLION, AT THE ISSUE PRICE. THE ISSUE WOULD CONSTITUTE 48.43% OF THE FULLY DILUTED POST ISSUE PAID-UP CAPITAL OF THE BANK. PRICE BAND: RS. 22 TO RS. 26 PER EQUITY SHARE OF FACE VALUE RS. 10 THE FACE VALUE OF THE SHARE IS RS. 10 AND THE FLOOR PRICE IS 2.2 TIMES OF THE FACE VALUE AND THE CAP PRICE IS 2.6 TIMES OF THE FACE VALUE.
    [Show full text]
  • Pune Cdap.Pdf
    PREFACE The process of planned economic development in India began with the launching of the First Five Year Plan in 1951 and currently India is in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-13 to 2016- 2017). The main objective of policy makers is to promote growth with social justice. During the Eleventh Plan period, the agricultural sector experienced a miniscule growth rate of 3.64 per cent per annum. Indian agriculture is presently at cross roads and one of the major challenges is to reverse deceleration in agricultural growth rates so as to successfully achieve a higher broad based growth. In view of the above, a special Additional Central Assistance Scheme -Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojna (RKVY) which is a State Plan scheme administered by the Union Ministry of Agriculture was conceived. The main purpose of the scheme is to supplement state specific strategies with a view to rejuvenate agriculture. The pattern of funding under this scheme is 100 percent Central grant. In order to avail of funds under RKVY, each district is entrusted with the task of preparing a comprehensive district agricultural plan. Accordingly, this plan was prepared for Pune district. The Plan revealed that the city has suitable infrastructure and conducive climate for high value agriculture. Floriculture is also coming up in a big way. Similarly dairy development and poultry have huge potential in the district. As the city is close to Mumbai and well connected by road, rail and air to other major cities there is a ready market available for consumption of agricultural goods, processed goods, dairy and poultry products.
    [Show full text]
  • Bollywood – Maharashtra and India's Film Cluster (Pdf)
    Bollywood – Maharashtra and India’s Film Cluster Final Paper for Microeconomics of Competitiveness May 2nd 2008 Christina Kukenshoner Meritxell Martinez Martin Mbaya Caroline Schmutte Yuko Watanabe Contents 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................3 2. Overall Economic Performance of India and Maharashtra ....................................................3 2.1. Economic Growth.............................................................................................................3 2.2. Historical Perspective of India and Maharashtra ...............................................................5 India’s political leadership and economic evolution.............................................................5 Maharashtra’s political leadership and economic impact......................................................6 2.3. Structure of the economy..................................................................................................7 India National Economy......................................................................................................7 Maharashtra State economy.................................................................................................9 3. Assessment of National Business Environment .....................................................................10 3.1. Human Development Indicators......................................................................................10 3.2. FDI
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Economics Inequality, Income
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS INEQUALITY, INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND GROWTH IN MAHARASHTRA IN THE 2000s Neeraj Hatekar Swati Raju WORKING PAPER UDE 43/2/2013 FEBRUARY 2013 ISSN 2230-8334 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI Vidyanagari, Mumbai 400 098 Documentation Sheet Title: Inequality, Income Distribution and Growth in Maharashtra in the 2000s Author: External Participation: Neeraj Hatekar ------ Swati Raju WP. No.: UDE 43/2/2013 Contents: 20 p, 7 T, 3 F, 15 R Date of Issue: February 2013 No. of Copies: 100 Abstract The paper analyses the inter-district inequality of per capita incomes in Maharashtra for the period 2001-2009 and finds that inter-district inequality rose for the period 2001-05 and subsequently declined. Though it has been rising, it is at a lower level than that observed for 2001-05. This has been accompanied by shifts in the relative ranking of different districts across the income distribution. Data does not point to the convergence of per capita incomes across districts. The historical composition of incomes, in particular the share of the tertiary sector in GDP, is an important predictor of divergence in district per capita incomes. Keywords: Inequality, Income Distribution, Convergence, Maharashtra JEL Code(s): O47 Inequality, Income Distribution and Growth in Maharashtra in the 2000s I Introduction Maharashtra’s economy has witnessed an annual average growth rate of 8.13% during the decade 2001-10. This is the third highest growth rate after Haryana and Gujarat which saw an annual average growth rate of 8.95% and 8.68% respectively among the non-special category States.
    [Show full text]
  • Q R? ^ ECONOMIC SURVEY of MAHARASHTRA 1992-93
    \ -’S3 q r ? ^ ECONOMIC SURVEY OF MAHARASHTRA 1992-93 .5?, 5T #mFRT^,iT^rnes DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMICS & STATISTICS, ‘ GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA, BOMBAY ECONOMIC SURVEY OF MAHARASHTRA 1992-93 N IEPA DC D0788/' UBRARY DOCUMENTATiON CEPiiHfc ‘si 'tion i! t.iscitute of Educatiou.»f Pla nO)w,5i and Administraticru I7-B, Sri Aurobindo Marg, N<^w Oelhi-110016 r o c . No ........... ...................c ^ -— m ^ STTfqqr” I 5r^7r?T m i T ^rr 5ET^ qW r5r|sR ?R H ^r t t stt% st^ | t ^ s i ^ 3tt| . s m 'O 3TTW 3TT|. I 5T^W?r ^>T WFTW 3T^ q% ^ TT^3TT=EJfT ^ 355^ tfw '# 3!r^ 3TT|^ ^ WFTRT f^nf^RTSSm 3TT^^ ^i^TT 3TT|^. srcfTVT?^T=5qT TTSTf^^TS# 3TT^=^T ^HTTt^r %^T 3 n | TT^ 'TT^ft^^T ^ 6 5ITT ^Tret ( ^ ^ ^ ^ TTTf^^l' ^lo5T 3?T|. ^155T ^ ^ 2|T T{Tf|^=siiT snmr ^ iT^rm% f?rsw st^-jtt^t ” ^tt stt^ sTT|G-. | f?rw^ sr^^mt ^^T T % ^n%r>5^rT 3Tifq^- ^mr jrmT sit^ . ^ 3tt% ^ smnfT^ ?TfT^T% 3TT ^^^OTTTTS^ t^q-RT 3TT^ 3 fr|^ . Y. qr SRTT^Rm STRii^Rt ^T^FTT fs^T^ ST^qT^ft SIT^t^ft ^TTrrf^c 3TT|. ^ Trrf|cfV %5T^^rm arwr 3tt| . Rc 4280— Ifl PREFACE The Directorate of Economics and Statistics brings out a publication titled “ Econorciic Survey of Maharashtra ” every year. The present publication for the year 1992-93 is the 32md issue in the series and is published both in Marathi and English (combined). 2. The publication is divided in two parts.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Modern Maharashtra
    1 F.Y.B.A. History Paper - I History of the Modern Maharashtra (1848-1960) SYLLABUS Module I... Maharashtra on the Eve of 1848 a) Historical Background of Maharashtra b) Historical Background of Mumbai Module II... Emergence and growth of Mumbai as a Port City a) Cotton and Opium Trade b) Modes of Transportation Module III…Trends in Reform Movements a) Prarthana Samaj and Satyashodhak Samaj b) Indian Social Conference and Efforts Towards Emancipation of Women Module IV…Origin and Growth of National Movement in Maharashtra a) Foundation of Indian National Congress and its growth till 1919 b) Revolutionary Nationalism and Gandhian Era Module V… Mumbai - the Financial Capital a) Textile Mills, Stock Market and Banking b) Labour Movements Module VI… Rise of New Forces a) Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Dalit Movement b) Tribal Uprisings and Peasants Movements Module VII… Integration and Reorganization a) Hydrabad Mukti Sangram b) Sanyukta Maharashtra Movement Module VIII …Education and Culture a) Progress in Education and Press b) Development in Theatre and Cinema, Architectural development in Mumbai 2 1 MAHARASHTRA ON THE EVE OF 1848 Unit Structure: 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Historical Background of Maharashtra 1.3 Social and Economic conditions of Maharashtra 1.4 Historical Background of Mumbai 1.5 Conclusion 1.6 Questions 1.0 OBJECTIVES After the study of this unit the student will be able to • Understand the origin of Maharashtra. • Explain the opinions of various historians about the origin of Maharashtra. • Grasp the historical background of Maharashtra upto 1848. • Comprehend historical background of Mumbai. • Perceive the development of Mumbai under various rulers.
    [Show full text]
  • Maharashtra-India’S Power House (Industrialization Heat Map)
    #MadeForBusiness Maharashtra-India’s Power House (Industrialization Heat Map) Population: 1250 million Population: 114 million India Geographical Area: 3,287,263 sq. kms. Maharashtra Geographical Area: 308,000 sq. kms. Nandurbar Jammu & Kashmir Gondiya Dhule Nagpur Jalgaon Amravati Bhandara Himachal Pradesh Akola Buldana Wardha Punjab Uttarakhand Nashik Washim Chandrapur Haryana Sikkim Arunanchal Pradesh Yavatmal Delhi Aurangabad Nagaland Thane Jalna Hingoli Gadchiroli Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh Assam Bihar Ahmednagar Meghalaya Manipur Tripura Mumbai Parbhani Jharkhand Beed Gujarat West Bengal Mizoram Nanded Madhya Pradesh Pune Raigad Latur Odisha Industrial Development Maharashtra Osmanabad Index Satara Solapur Telangana 1 Ratnagiri Highly Developed 2 Sangli Goa 3 Andhra Pradesh 4 Karnataka Andaman and Nicobar Kolhapur 5 Sindhudurg 6 Tamil Nadu Kerala 7 8 Highly 9 Note: The maps are for the purpose of information and not recommendation Underdeveloped • Data for Industrialization of India from DPIIT • Data for Industrialization of Maharashtra: Economic Survey of Maharashtra 2018-19 10 India - Maharashtra (Comparative Advantages) Comparative Advantages for Maharashtra State FDI Investments Highest Industrial Output Economy India • Total cumulative FDI • India’s total industrial • The size of the Indian Inflows in India from output by value increased economy is USD 2.72 April 2000 to June 5.87% by value to ~USD trillion. 2019 stood at USD 436 104 billion billion Maharashtra • Maharashtra is only state • Maharashtra attracts a • Maharashtra contributed which contributes more lion’s share (30%) of of ~15% of the total than 15% of the Indian the FDI Inflows. Total industrial output by value. economy. Total size of the FDI cumulative in The total contribution of economy of Maharashtra Maharashtra is USD Maharashtra stood at is USD 484 bilion 128 billion ~USD 15 billion Note: The maps and the comparatives information is for the purpose of information and not recommendation.
    [Show full text]