Star Fleet Battles Table of Contents R2.0 Federation
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Surya Class Frigate
SURYA CLASS FRIGATE A trailblazing design, the Surya class takes its place with the Constitution, Saladin and Fed- It wasn’t until 2248 that the Surya—along with the Coventry, Loknar, Saladin and Larson eration as one of the most important ship classes of the Class I era. classes—was able to free up the larger heavy cruisers and assume primary responsibility for defensive/offensive operations. It was from this point forward that these ships began to Originally, the Anton class was set to be produced to uprated specifications—the design build an impressive and fearsome reputation. itself being altered to correct a number of flaws. However, the changes compounded what was already a complicated and complex design. After review, the decision was sub- sequently reversed and existing ships were gradually withdrawn from service. In 2249, the Pralaya (FF 1855), Avenger (FF 1860) and Illustrious (FF 1863) were present with the 8th Fleet at the Battle of Thranstor. The introduction of Phaser weaponry that year and Instead, the ASDB revisited an earlier proposal, the Hunt class Light Cruiser. Little more than its presence on the majority of the Starfleet vessels present at the battle helped ensure a a Ptolemy class transport/tug with more comprehensive armament, Hunt was an intriguing swift and overwhelming Federation victory. The Pralaya was lost with all hands not long af- modification of an already proven design, though it was eventually dropped in favor of the ter, being drawn into an ambush outside the Beta Aurigae star system. Kearsarge class. Throughout the war though, a favored tactic of fleet commanders was to disguise these The potential of a fully armed Ptolemy was not lost on designers though and from this point, vessels as Ptolemy class transport/tugs and use them (usually in groups of 2 or more) as they continued to study various proposals based around it. -
The Economic Consequences of Investing in Shipbuilding Case Studies in the United States and Sweden
The Economic Consequences of Investing in Shipbuilding Case Studies in the United States and Sweden Edward G. Keating, Irina Danescu, Dan Jenkins, James Black, Robert Murphy, Deborah Peetz, Sarah H. Bana C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1036 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9036-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Littoral Combat Ship 6 (Jackson) and 8 (Montgomery) under construction in the Mobile River at Austal USA’s site in Mobile, Alabama (photo by Irina Danescu). Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. -
GAO-08-418 Force Structure: Ship Rotational Crewing Initiatives Would Benefit from Top-Level Leadership, Navy-Wide Guidance
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees GAO May 2008 FORCE STRUCTURE Ship Rotational Crewing Initiatives Would Benefit from Top-Level Leadership, Navy-wide Guidance, Comprehensive Analysis, and Improved Lessons- Learned Sharing GAO-08-418 May 2008 FORCE STRUCTURE Accountability Integrity Reliability Ship Rotational Crewing Initiatives Would Benefit Highlights from Top-Level Leadership, Navy-wide Guidance, Highlights of GAO-08-418, a report to Comprehensive Analysis, and Improved Lessons- congressional committees Learned Sharing Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Navy faces affordability Rotational crewing represents a transformational cultural change for the challenges as it supports a high Navy. While the Navy has provided leadership in some rotational crewing pace of operations and increasing programs, the Navy has not fully established a comprehensive management ship procurement costs. The Navy approach to coordinate and integrate rotational crewing efforts across the has used multiple crews on some department and among various types of ships. GAO’s prior work showed that submarines and surface ships and has shown it to increase a ship’s sound management practices for implementing transformational programs operational availability. GAO was include ensuring top leadership drives the change and dedicating an asked to evaluate the extent to implementation team. The Navy has not assigned clear leadership and which the Navy, for ship rotational accountability for rotational crewing or designated an implementation team to crewing, has (1) employed a ensure that rotational crewing receives the attention necessary to be effective. comprehensive management Without a comprehensive management approach, the Navy may not be able to approach, (2) developed and lead a successful transformation of its crewing culture. -
NSIAD-91-158 Navy Homeports
United States Gmeral Account;ing Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters ~JUIW 1991 NAVY HOMEPORTS Expanded Structure Unnecessary and Costly 111MIlll Ill1 144161 -- National Security and International Affairs Division B-239699 June 14,199l The Honorable Charles E. Bennett Chairman, Subcommittee on Seapower and Strategic and Critical Materials Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives The Honorable Patricia Schroeder Chair, Subcommittee on Military Installations and Facilities Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives As requested, we reviewed the Navy’s strategic homeporting program. Our analysis included berthing capacity of existing homeports, the strategic considerations that would be affected if the new homeports were not opened, and the costs to develop and operate each new homeport. We are sending copies of this report to the Chairmen, Senate and House Committees on Armed Services and on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, and House Committee on Government Operations; the Director of the Office of Management and Budget; the Secretaries of Defense and the Navy; and the Chairman, Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. We will make copies available to others upon request. This report was prepared under the direction of Martin Ferber, Director, Navy Issues, who may be reached on (202) 276-6604 if you or your staff have any questions. Other major contributors are listed in appendix II. Frank C. Conahan Assistant Comptroller General Ekecutive Summq During the early 198Os, in conjunction with the goal to expand its fleet Purpose to 600 ships, the Navy planned to expand the number of homeports. Since then, the international situation has changed, the defense budget has decreased, and a smaller fleet is planned. -
MARCOM Personal Letter Template
NATO UNCLASSIFIED .0 HEADQUARTERS, ALLIED MARITIME COMMAND Atlantic Building, Northwood Headquarters, Sandy Lane Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 3HP United Kingdom Our Ref: Tel: +44 (0)1923 956577 NCN: 57+ 56577 Date: 9 April 2019 Email: [email protected] IAW distribution MONTHLY NEWSLETTER NATO MARCOM APRIL 2019 NATO MARCOM continues training and operational activities with Exercise DYNAMIC MANTA 2019, an antisubmarine exercise in the Mediterranean Sea, and the second Focused Operation of the year (FOCOPS 19-2) under Operation Sea Guardian (OSG). Maritime Security Operations During March, 73 warships from France, Turkey, Spain, Greece, Portugal, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and Albania took part in OSG, providing support in various roles in the Mediterranean. Additionally, NATO Airborne Early Warning (AEW) and Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) conducted 217 flights in support of OSG. AEW flights were provided by NATO’s own assets while the MPA flights were provided by Greece, Spain, Italy, Turkey, France and USA. Submarines under NATO and national operational command also provided critical support to OSG. Commencing 30 March, FOCOPS 19-2 has been taking place in the Eastern and Central Mediterranean led by the Turkish Navy onboard TCG Kemalreis, and supported by various submarine and air assets. Overall, OSG is enhancing NATO Maritime Situational Awareness (MSA) in the Mediterranean, increasing the Alliance’s knowledge of the Maritime Pattern of Life (MPoL), and detecting anomalies to counter terrorism. A total of 339 MV were hailed by NATO during March. Standing NATO Maritime Groups New units have joined Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 (SNMG-1) led by USS Gravely (DDG 107): the Polish frigate ORP General Kazimerz Pulaski, the German auxiliary ship FGS Spessart, the British frigate HMS Westminster, the Danish frigate HDMS Absalon, the Spanish frigate ESPS Almirante Juan De Borbón, the German Auxiliary FGS Rhön and the Turkish frigate TCG Gokova. -
The Good Frigate Reeves
U S S R EEVES (DLG - 2 4 / C G - 2 4 ) A SSOCIATION May 2009 Volume 2, Issue 3 The Ironman—A Double Ender’s Newsletter Membership Scorebox The Good Frigate Reeves Current 57 Many of us, especially in the early was the USS Chesapeake from the War of years of Reeves life, have heard her de- 1812, shown here before capture by HMS Past Due 30 scribed as a frigate. Indeed, that was a Leopold. The most famous frigate from characterization of her relative size and this era was the USS Constitution. Snail Mail Ad- 227 significance to the fleet. She was a really dresses I had the privilege in 1974 of escort- either big destroyer or a small cruiser. Of ing my father and mother onboard Reeves Email Address 258 course, it all depended upon where you when she was starboard side to Bravo Only stood on the pier when you looked up at Piers. My father‘s first observation from her. the pier, looking bow on, was ―she‘s a Now in the olden days, frigates con- pocket cruiser.‖ Of course, he was a jured up the image of medium-sized sail- WWII veteran and cruisers were a skochie Dues Notice! ing ships. They were somewhere between bit smaller than our ―modern‖ destroy- Please be sure to check ers—although Reeves was a whole lot your mailing label. bigger than my first Fletcher. If it doesn’t say Current It turns out that a modern ―pocket‖ (plus year) above your cruiser is really a light cruiser, of the name at the top of the Brooklyn Class. -
Diary of Leading Stoker Victor Bethell HMS Gloucester 1916
Diary of Leading Stoker Victor Bethell, HMS Gloucester, 26th April – 5th June 1916 HMS Gloucester was a Town-class light cruiser that took part in the first naval encounter of the war, the chase of the German battlecruiser SMS Goeben and the light cruiser SMS Breslau in the Mediterranean, during which she engaged and hit Breslau. In May 1916, she was back in home waters with the 3rd Light Cruiser Squadron, part of the Grand Fleet’s Battlecruiser fleet. The extract below covers the Irish Easter Rising and the Battle of Jutland. A Leading Stoker was in charge of a group of stokers, whose job was to shovel coal into the furnaces of a ship’s boilers. Known as the ‘Black Gang’, they did hot, hard work in the bowels of the ship. Wednesday 26th April: At Queenstown. We take onboard 100 Royal Marines and proceed to Galway Bay, on the west coast of Ireland. Thursday 27th April: We arrive at Galway and land the soldiers to stop the Sinn Féin rising. The Irish Police bring aboard five leaders and we held them prisoners. Friday 28th April: Troopship arrives and they land more soldiers. Wednesday 10th May: Still at Galway. HMS Adventure relieves us and we proceed to Queensferry in the Firth of Forth. Friday 12th May: Arrived at Queensferry. Tuesday 30th May: Left Queensferry with the fleet and go full speed for Germany. Wednesday 31st May: At four pm, enemy sighted and our battlecruisers open fire. We were alongside the battlecruisers (HMS Lion flagship) about the moment that HMS Invincible was blown up and sank in a few minutes (she was off the port side of us). -
Ship Hull Classification Codes
Ship Hull Classification Codes Warships USS Constitution, Maine, and Texas MSO Minesweeper, Ocean AKA Attack Cargo Ship MSS Minesweeper, Special (Device) APA Attack Transport PC Patrol Coastal APD High Speed Transport PCE Patrol Escort BB Battleship PCG Patrol Chaser Missile CA Gun Cruiser PCH Patrol Craft (Hydrofoil) CC Command Ship PF Patrol Frigate CG Guided Missile Cruiser PG Patrol Combatant CGN Guided Missile Cruiser (Nuclear Propulsion) PGG Patrol Gunboat (Missile) CL Light Cruiser PGH Patrol Gunboat (Hydrofoil) CLG Guided Missile Light Cruiser PHM Patrol Combatant Missile (Hydrofoil) CV Multipurpose Aircraft Carrier PTF Fast Patrol Craft CVA Attack Aircraft Carrier SS Submarine CVE Escort Aircraft Carrier SSAG Auxiliary Submarine CVHE Escort Helicopter Aircraft Carrier SSBN Ballistic Missile Submarine (Nuclear Powered) CVL Light Carrier SSG Guided Missile Submarine CVN Multipurpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear Propulsion) SSN Submarine (Nuclear Powered) CVS ASW Support Aircraft Carrier DD Destroyer DDG Guided Missile Destroyer DE Escort Ship DER Radar Picket Escort Ship DL Frigate EDDG Self Defense Test Ship FF Frigate FFG Guided Missile Frigate FFR Radar Picket Frigate FFT Frigate (Reserve Training) IX Unclassified Miscellaneous LCC Amphibious Command Ship LFR Inshore Fire Support Ship LHA Amphibious Assault Ship (General Purpose) LHD Amphibious Assault Ship (Multi-purpose) LKA Amphibious Cargo Ship LPA Amphibious Transport LPD Amphibious Transport Dock LPH Amphibious Assault Ship (Helicopter) LPR Amphibious Transport, Small LPSS Amphibious Transport Submarine LSD Dock Landing Ship LSM Medium Landing Ship LST Tank Landing Ship MCM Mine Countermeasure Ship MCS Mine Countermeasure Support Ship MHC Mine Hunter, Coastal MMD Mine Layer, Fast MSC Minesweeper, Coastal (Nonmagnetic) MSCO Minesweeper, Coastal (Old) MSF Minesweeper, Fleet Steel Hulled 10/17/03 Copyright (C) 2003. -
Patrol Torpedo Boats During World War II
University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall 12-15-2012 Firing Point: Patrol Torpedo Boats during World War II Joshua J. Schick University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Schick, Joshua J., "Firing Point: Patrol Torpedo Boats during World War II" (2012). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 1602. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1602 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Firing Point: Patrol Torpedo Boats during World War II A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By Joshua James Schick B.A. Louisiana State University, 2010 December, 2012 Acknowledgement I would like to thank my thesis committee comprised of Dr. -
Littoral Combat Ship an Examination of Its Possible Concepts of Operation
Center for Strategi C and Budgetary a S S e ssm e n t S Littoral Combat Ship An Examination of its Possible Concepts of Operation By Martin n. Murphy littoral combat ship: an examination of its possible concepts of operation By Martin N. Murphy 2010 © 2010 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. about the center for strategic and budgetary assessments The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy and resource allocation. CSBA provides timely, impartial and insightful analyses to senior decision mak- ers in the executive and legislative branches, as well as to the media and the broader national security community. CSBA encourages thoughtful participation in the de- velopment of national security strategy and policy, and in the allocation of scarce human and capital resources. CSBA’s analysis and outreach focus on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to US national security. Meeting these challenges will require transforming the national security establishment, and we are devoted to helping achieve this end. about the author Dr. Martin Murphy joined CSBA in fall 2008 bringing with him a research focus on naval warfare, maritime irregular warfare, mari- time security, piracy and transnational criminal threats. He is the author of Small Boats, Weak States, Dirty Money, a major study of criminal and political disorder at sea published by Columbia University Press in Spring 2009, and Contemporary Piracy and Maritime Terrorism, an Adelphi Paper published by the London- based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in 2007. -
South Pacific Destroyers: the United States Navy and the Challenges of Night Surface Combat
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2009 South Pacific esD troyers: The nitU ed States Navy and the Challenges of Night Surface Combat in the Solomons Islands during World War II. Johnny Hampton Spence East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Spence, Johnny Hampton, "South Pacific eD stroyers: The nitU ed States Navy and the Challenges of Night Surface Combat in the Solomons Islands during World War II." (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1865. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1865 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. South Pacific Destroyers: The United States Navy and the Challenges of Night Surface Combat in the Solomons Islands During World War II ____________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ____________________________ by Johnny H. Spence, II August 2009 ____________________________ Dr. Ronnie Day, Chair Dr. Emmett Essin Dr. Stephen Fritz Keywords: Destroyers, World War II, Pacific, United States Navy, Solomon Islands ABSTRACT South Pacific Destroyers: The United States Navy and the Challenges of Night Surface Combat in the Solomons Islands during World War II by Johnny H. -
Wreck of HMS Falmouth, Off Bridlington Statement Of
www.fjordr.com v. 100816 Wreck of HMS Falmouth, off Bridlington Statement of Significance with supporting narrative Introduction This Statement of Significance has been prepared by Fjordr Limited on behalf of Historic England as part of the HMS Falmouth project (HE 7025). HMS Falmouth was a Town Class light cruiser laid down February 1910 at Beardmores at Dalmuir on the River Clyde. HMS Falmouth was based in home waters during the First World War and was engaged in numerous operations, including several major engagements (Heligoland Bight, 28th August 1914; Raid on Scarborough, Whitby and Hartlepool, 16th December 1914; Jutland, 31st May – 1st June 1916). HMS Falmouth sank as a result of being repeatedly torpedoed by U-boats in the fleet action of 19-20th August 1916.The identification and position of the wreck of HMS Falmouth are firmly established. The wreck of HMS Falmouth is important in terms of its period and rarity. As an isolated wreck it does not have group value as such, but it has a clear association with the landscape of the North Sea in the First World War. These aspects of its significance arise from the narratives manifest in Falmouth’s physical remains relating to its construction, motive power, armament, operational history and life on board. HMS Falmouth also exhibits several key aspects of England’s history immediately prior to the First World War and in the first two years of the conflict. The importance of the wreck of HMS Falmouth is elaborated below in respect of the ship’s build, use, loss, survival and investigation.