DOCSLIB.ORG

Judging in the Public Realm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judging in the Public Realm JUDGING IN THE PUBLIC REALM A Kantian Approach to the Deliberative Concept of Ethico-Political Judgment and an Inquiry into Public Discourse on Prenatal Diagnosis Cornelis Dekker Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, No. 466 Department of Technology and Social Change, Linköping University Linköping 2009 Linköping Studies in Arts and Science • No 466 At the Faculty of Arts and Science at Linköpings universitet, research and doctoral studies are carried out within broad problem areas. Research is organized in interdisciplinary research environments and doctoral studies mainly in graduate schools. Jointly, they publish the series Linköping Studies in Arts and Science. This thesis comes from the Department of Technology and Social Change at the Tema Institute. Distributed by : Department of Technology and Social Change Linköping University SE- 581 83 Linköping, Sweden http://www.tema.liu.se/tema-t/ Edition 1:1 ISBN: 978-91-7393-739-9 ISSN: 0282-9800 © Cornelis Dekker Print: Liu Tryck. Linköping 2009. Cover design: Tomas Hägg CONTENTS 1. PUBLIC DELIBERATION AND ETHICO-POLITICAL JUDGMENT 9 1.1 An inquiry into public deliberation 10 1.2 The deliberative concept of ethico-political judgment 17 1.3 Outline 30 Φ PART 1 THE IDEAL OF ETHICO-POLITICAL JUDGMENT: HOW TO DELIBERATE 2. JUSTIFYING JUDGINGS 33 2.1 Kantian normative reasons 34 2.2 Intersubjectivity from Kant to Habermas 49 2.3 The unforced force of normative reasons 62 3. THE CAPACITY TO JUDGE 69 3.1 Arendt on the power of judgment 69 3.2 ‘Enlarged thought’ and the law 87 3.3 Impartiality of judgment and the other 98 4. DELIBERATING IN A PLURALIST WORLD 103 4.1 Too different to deliberate? 104 4.2 The deliberative justification of judgments 114 4.3 From sensus communis to consensus? 119 Φ Φ PART 2 JUDGING IN PUBLIC DISCOURSE: HOW WE DO DELIBERATE 5. THE INQUIRY OF JUDGING IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE 125 5.1 Public discourses considered 125 5.2 Inquiring into judging 128 5.3 On the inquiry into public discourse 137 6. JUDGING IN DUTCH PUBLIC DISCOURSE 143 6.1 ‘The unborn life’: the protection and quality of life 143 6.2 ‘Attitudes towards the disabled’: the valuation of the disabled 149 6.3 ‘Implications of new choices’: medicalization and autonomy 155 6.4 ‘The limits of medicine’: distinguishing ‘severe’ and ‘less severe’ afflictions? 163 7. JUDGING IN SWEDISH PUBLIC DISCOURSE 171 7.1 ‘The unborn life’: human dignity and suffering 171 7.2 ‘Attitudes towards the disabled’: grading human dignity? 177 7.3 ‘Implications of new choices’: can autonomy be realized? 183 7.4 ‘The limits of medicine’: Heading toward liberal eugenics? 191 8. JUDGING CONSIDERED 199 8.1 ‘The unborn life’: irreconcilable disagreement? 200 8.2 ‘Attitudes towards the disabled’: a role for experience? 204 8.3 ‘Implications of new choices’: agreement about autonomy? 207 8.4 ‘The limits of medicine’: justifying limits? 210 8.5 Judging and deliberation 212 Φ Φ Φ PART 3 JUDGING IN THE PUBLIC REALM: ENHANCING DELIBERATION 9. ENHANCING PUBLIC DELIBERATION 215 9.1 Shaping deliberative practices 216 9.2 The contribution of ethics to public deliberation 222 9.3 Judging and deliberating: the ideal of ethico-political judgment 228 LITERATURE 235 SOURCES 250 ABBREVIATIONS OF WORKS OF KANT A Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. by Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006). AQE ‘Beantwortung der Frage. Was ist Aufklärung?’ (1784). ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment’’, in Political Writings, trans. by H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007). CJ/KrU Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790. In Werke, Band 8. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1975). Critique of Judgement, trans. by James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1952). CPR Kritik der Reinen Vernunft (1781/1787). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007). CPrR Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788). Critique of Practical Reason, trans. by Thomas K. Abbott. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books (1996). EP ‘Untersuchung über die Deutlichkeit der Grundsätze der natürlichen Theologie und Moral’ (1763). ‘Enquiry concerning the clarity of the principles of natural theology and ethics’, in Selected Pre-Critical Writings and Correspondence with Beck, trans. by G.B. Kerferd and D.E. Walford. Manchester (1962). FI Erste Einleitung in die Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790). First Introduction to the Critique of Judgement, trans. by James Haden. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill (1965) Gr Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. by Thomas K. Abott. Toronto: Broadview (2005). LE Vorlesungen über Ethik. Lectures on Ethics, trans. by Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2001). LL Vorlesungen über Logik. Lectures on Logic, trans. by Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2004). MM Die Metaphysik der Sitten (1797). The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006). OBS Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen (1764). Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, trans. by John T. Goldthwait. Berkeley: University of California Press (1960). OT ‘Was heiβt: Sich im Denken orientieren?’ (1786). ‘What is Orientation in Thinking?’, in Political Writings, trans. by H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007). PP ‘Zum ewigen Frieden’ (1795). ‘Perpetual Peace’, in Political Writings, trans. by H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007). Prol Prolegomena zur einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können (1783). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to present itself as a science, trans. by Peter G. Lucas. Manchester: Manchester University Press (1953). TP ’Über den Gemeinspruch: ‘Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis’’ (1793). ‘On the common saying: ‘This may be true in theory but it does not apply in practice’’ (‘Theory and Practice’), in Political Writings, trans. by H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007). There is something to be said, my lord, for his point of view, And for yours as well, there is much to be said on both sides. Sophocles, Antigone Judging is one, if not the most, important activity in which the sharing-the-world-with-others comes to pass Hannah Arendt Everything valuable is vulnerable Lucebert ACKNOWLEDGMENT Gratitude is a duty that is relevant when writing an acknowledgment. Gratitude consists of honouring a person because of the benefit he or she has rendered. I should start with Anders Nordgren. His constructive comments, suggestions, and ideas have been invaluable. I am very grateful to him. Göran Collste has provided very valuable comments which I have appreciated. I am, furthermore, indebted to the following people for their valuable comments: Martin Andersson, Mats G. Hansson, Lennart Nordenfelt, Anders Persson, Bo Pettersson, Johanna Romare, Tsjalling Swierstra, Jan Willner, Sven Widmalm, and Kristin Zeiler. I am very grateful to Peter-Paul Verbeek, who has commented on several versions of the thesis. Technological mediation made it possible to stay in touch. Hans Achterhuis and I have discussed texts over several dinners, of which I have pleasant memories. Henk Procee and I reflected upon reflective judgment, which I also have appreciated. I am grateful to Erik Malmqvist with whom I have discussed texts, also in the pub. I am indebted to the participants in the Technology, Practice, Identity Seminar at Tema Technology and Social Change and the Ethics Seminar at the Centre for Applied Ethics. I am also grateful to Boel Berner. Furthermore, I am indebted to Eva Danielsson, Agnese Grisle, and Christina Lärkner. I have discussed life as a doctoral student, as well as many other questions with Ulrika Engdahl and Anders Johansson and have pleasant memories of the numerous lunches, pub visits, dinners, and coffee breaks. The thesis is dedicated to Simon and Elsa. 7 8 CHAPTER 1 Public deliberation and ethico-political judgment The point of this inquiry is that we should enhance discussions about moral and political questions. We should, in other words, deliberate. I shall speak of deliberation in two senses: as a public discussion in the various arenas of the public sphere, in the sense of giving and asking for reasons, and as the weighing up of matters in the mind by thinking on the basis of the standpoints of others. As a matter of fact, we do deliberate. We wish to voice our concerns and to exert influence. Still, we may aim to enhance the way we deliberate. In this inquiry, a deliberative concept of ethico-political judgment will, to this end, be elaborated on. An argument for public deliberation is that it may ensure the legitimacy of democratic decisions. From this perspective, deliberation is closely connected with our understanding of democracy. Understandings of democracy can differ. Representative democracy can take different shapes. Many argue that we should enhance our representative democracy by conversing more at different levels. John Dewey captured the essence of what is now called ‘deliberative democracy’, a democracy whereby citizens are increasingly involved in discussions concerning a public course of action. If we are dissatisfied with democratic institutions, the remedy is not simply to extend or refine aggregating individual interests or preferences but to have more and better democratic deliberation: The essential need, in other words, is the improvement of methods and conditions of debate, discussion, and persuasion. That is the problem of the public.1 What if we are not dissatisfied with our institutions? Perhaps we do not have a problem with legitimacy? Given the plurality of viewpoints in society, for instance with regard to prenatal diagnosis, my hypothesis is that we need and can also enhance the legitimacy of decisions. There are proponents and opponents, and even those who lie in between; and choices have to made.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Inquiry As Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______
    ______________________________________________________________________________ Critical Inquiry as Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______________________________________________________________________________ Austin Pickup, Aurora University Abstract This article examines critical inquiry and truth-telling from the perspective of two comple- mentary theoretical frameworks. First, Aristotelian phronesis, or practical wisdom, offers a framework for truth that is oriented toward ethical deliberation while recognizing the contingency of practical application. Second, Foucauldian parrhesia calls for an engaged sense of truth-telling that requires risk from the inquirer while grounding truth in the com- plexity of human discourse. Taken together, phronesis and parrhesia orient inquirers to- ward intentional truth-telling practices that resist simplistic renderings of criticality and overly technical understandings of research. This article argues that truly critical inquiry must spring from the perspectives of phronesis and parrhesia, providing research projects that aim at virtuous truth-telling over technical veracity with the hope of contributing to ethical discourse and social praxis. Keywords: phronesis, praxis, parrhesia, critical inquiry, truth-telling Introduction The theme of this special issue considers the nature of critical inquiry, specifically methodological work that remains committed to explicit goals of social justice and the good. One of the central concerns of this issue is that critical studies have lost much of their meaning due to a proliferation of the term critical in educational scholarship. As noted in the introduction to this issue, much contemporary work in education research that claims to be critical may be so in name only, offering but methodological techniques to engage in critical work; techniques that are incapable of inter- vening in both the epistemological and ontological formations of normative practices in education.
    [Show full text]
  • Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice
    Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice Richard Halverson University of Wisconsin - Madison Abstract This paper develops Aristotle’s idea of phronesis, or practical wisdom, as a framework to access, represent and communicate the complexity of successful instructional leadership practice in schools. The design and use of artifacts, the tools leaders develop and implement in their practice, provide a window into the patterns of problem-setting and problem-solving that guide the expression of phronesis in school leadership. Introduction It has long been recognized that where you find good schools, you also often find the legacy of strong leadership. Prior research has defined many of the characteristics of schools with strong instructional programs, such as professional community grounded in instruction among teachers and leaders, a shared sense of instructional vision, group ownership of the instructional process and links between supervisory, assessment and instructional practices. 1 School leaders are responsible for the design and maintenance of these essential conditions in existing school systems.2 However, while we know quite a bit about the characteristics of such school communities, we know quite a bit less about how these characteristics develop together to become distinctive features of the school community. A strong professional community among teachers, for example, can either presuppose or help create group ownership of instructional process, which in turn may Submitted for publication: Please to not cite without the author’s permission 1 2 depend upon or generate the need for stronger internal linkages between assessment and instruction. The implementation and coordination of these conditions is an important aspect of improving student learning in schools.3 Accessing how school leaders understand and manage schools calls for a new approach to understanding the leadership practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review F
    Book Review F. J. Mootz III and G. H. Taylor, eds. Gadamer and Ricoeur: Critical Horizons for Contemporary Hermeneutics (New York/London: Continuum, 2011), 297 pp. Marc-Antoine Vallée EHESS (Paris) Études Ricœuriennes / Ricœur Studies, Vol 3, No 2 (2012), pp. 171-173 ISSN 2155-1162 (online) DOI 10.5195/errs.2012.153 http://ricoeur.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. Book Review F. J. Mootz III and G. H. Taylor, eds. Gadamer and Ricoeur: Critical Horizons for Contemporary Hermeneutics (New York/London: Continuum, 2011), 297 pp. Five years ago, it was totally impossible to find a book entirely dedicated to a systematic study of the complex relations between the hermeneutics of Gadamer and Ricoeur. This was quite surprising if we consider the importance of these two philosophers to the development of a hermeneutical philosophy over the last century. Fortunately, it seems that the relevance of a critical discussion on Gadamer’s and Ricoeur’s hermeneutics has recently become more obvious, first with the publication of Daniel Frey’s book on L’interprétation et la lecture chez Ricoeur et Gadamer (2008), and now with this initiative of Francis J. Mootz III and George H. Taylor to bring into conversation "Gadamerian and Ricoeurian scholars" in one volume. The result of this well- inspired idea is a book containing twelve chapters studying, from different perspectives, the agreements and disagreements between Gadamer’s and Ricoeur’s philosophies, not without significant convergences and divergences between the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Methods for the Modern Lawyer
    CLASSICAL METHODS FOR THE MODERN LAWYER: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN ETHICS, MORALITY AND EFFICACY IN THE TRANSACTIONAL CONTEXT Gerald T. Nowak, P.C. PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE: DRAFTING AND NEGOTIATING CORPORATE AGREEMENTS 2011 Chicago, Illinois -- February 10, 2011 K&E 14501746.2 Gerald T. ("Jerry") Nowak is a corporate partner in the Chicago office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. He has a broad transactional practice, including capital markets transactions, M&A transactions and corporate governance matters. His capital markets practice focuses on complex securities matters, including initial public offerings, high yield offerings, spin-offs, tender offers and investment grade debt offerings. His M&A practice includes public and private acquisitions for private equity funds and public companies. He holds a B.A. from Michigan State University, an M.B.A from Auburn University and a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School, none of which are in philosophy. ii K&E 14501746.2 I. INTRODUCTION A. Ethics, Morality and Efficacy As lawyers, we are bound by a code of ethics that regulates both what we do and how we do it. There are any number of technical rules that govern a lawyer’s behavior, from rules limiting lawyer advertising to rules regulating conflicts of interest, and, apropos to this article, rules regulating how we conduct ourselves in transactional negotiations. Much of the substance of the ethical rules can be summed up by the Cub Scout’s exhortation to “do your best” and “tell the truth.” The rules that govern a lawyer’s behavior are commonly referred to as “legal ethics” or the “ethical rules.” This nomenclature can be confusing to those of us who, prior to being taught otherwise, tended to conflate “ethics” with “morality.” At least in the legal arena, the two bear only a passing resemblance to one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Education from Episteme to Phronesis: the Contribution of French Didactic Theory Corinne Hahn, Christophe Vignon
    Management education from episteme to phronesis: The contribution of French didactic theory Corinne Hahn, Christophe Vignon To cite this version: Corinne Hahn, Christophe Vignon. Management education from episteme to phronesis: The contribu- tion of French didactic theory. Management Learning, SAGE Publications, 2019, 50 (3), pp.337-354. 10.1177/1350507619831118. halshs-02068936 HAL Id: halshs-02068936 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02068936 Submitted on 25 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Management education from episteme to phronesis: The contribution of French didactic theory Corinne Hahn ESCP Europe Christophe Vignon University of Rennes 1, France Abstract In this article, we review some of the criticisms levelled at current management education provided by business schools and the recommendations made by critical management studies scholars. These authors generally recommend placing greater emphasis on phronesis, that is, the manager’s practical wisdom. We investigated this path and formulated a practical solution, rooted in the operational framework provided by French didactic theory. It takes the form of a specific pedagogical device, the aim of which is to foster closer connections between experience acquired in professional settings and theoretical knowledge derived from management sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009
    International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009 Editorial Werner Fricke, Øyvind Pålshaugen 5 Popular Education and Participatory Research: Facing Inequalities in Latin America Danilo R. Streck 13 Organizing – A Strategic Option for Trade Union Renewal? Klaus Dörre, Hajo Holst, Oliver Nachtwey 33 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby 68 Opening to the World through the Lived Body: Relating Theory and Practice in Organisation Consulting Robert Farrands 114 Book review Olav Eikeland (2008): The Ways of Aristotle. Aristotelian phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research reviewed by Ole Fogh Kirkeby 144 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby In this article, the Greek concept of phronesis is analyzed on the basis of its philosophical roots, and the indispensability of its strong normative content is emphasized. This creates a distance to most of the recent under- standing of phronesis as prudence, and hence as practical wisdom with a pragmatic and strategic content. The strong dilemmas created by the nor- mative background of real phronesis present management and leadership as a choice in every situation. From this foundation, phronesis is inter- preted as primarily the sense of the event, and an alternative concept of the event is developed. The presentation of the event also demands a theory of the relation of mind and matter, and hence of the body in the event. This is achieved under inspiration from Stoic philosophy. With this in mind, the more serious approaches to practical wisdom: phronesis as determinant of meta-concepts of research; phronesis as a liberating organizational strategy of learning; phronesis as a strategy of knowledge management; phronesis as a narrative strategy; and phronesis as the capacity of the leader, are presented and analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2021 PAULA LOUISE GOTTLIEB Department of Philosophy 5185 Helen C
    May 2021 PAULA LOUISE GOTTLIEB Department of Philosophy 5185 Helen C. White Hall 600 North Park Street University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263 0253 (office) (608) 265 3701 (fax) [email protected] (e-mail) gottlieb.philosophy.wisc.edu (web site) Present Position: Full Professor of Philosophy and Affiliate Professor of Classical and Near Eastern Studies Education: St. Hilda’s College, Oxford University, England 1977-83: B.A. Hons. in Literae Humaniores (Ancient Greek and Latin Literature; Philosophy and Ancient Greek and Roman History) 1981 B.Phil. in Philosophy (Moral and Political Philosophy, Philosophical Logic and Aristotle) 1983 M.A. 1986 Cornell University 1983-88: M.A. in Philosophy 1986 Ph.D. in Philosophy 1988 Areas of Specialization: Ancient Greek Philosophy; Ethics B.Phil. Thesis: “Some Problems of Akrasia in Aristotle and Modern Writers” Main Supervisor: M. J. Woods; also Susan Hurley Doctoral Dissertation: “Aristotle and the Measure of All Things” Committee: T. H. Irwin (main supervisor), Gail Fine, David Lyons and Sydney Shoemaker Employment: Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Fall 1988-Spring 1994 Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Summer 1994-Fall 1999 Full Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, from Fall 1999 1 Honors and Awards: Oxford: Open Exhibition, 1977-81 Christina Keith Travel Prize (awarded by the college), 1979 Postgraduate College Scholarship, 1981-83 Cornell: Sage Graduate Fellowship, 1983-84 Martin McVoy Trust Fellowship, 1987-88 Messenger-Chalmers prize for “the doctoral dissertation giving evidence of the best research and most fruitful thought” in the Humanities (University-wide, Cornell University, 1989) Honorable mention in the Guilford Prize for the best-written dissertation (University- wide, Cornell University, 1989) University nomination for a National Endowment for the Humanities summer stipend, 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • An Aristotelian Interpretation of Practical Wisdom: the Case of Retirees
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Business - Papers Faculty of Business January 2019 An Aristotelian interpretation of practical wisdom: the case of retirees Peter R. Massingham University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/buspapers Recommended Citation Massingham, Peter R., "An Aristotelian interpretation of practical wisdom: the case of retirees" (2019). Faculty of Business - Papers. 1640. https://ro.uow.edu.au/buspapers/1640 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] An Aristotelian interpretation of practical wisdom: the case of retirees Abstract This paper aims to improve understanding of the concept of practical wisdom. The theoretical lens used is Aristotle's practical rationality or 'phronesis'. Researchers argue that practical wisdom should be used as an organising framework for professional knowledge. Aristotle believed that practical wisdom as the highest intellectual virtue. Phronesis is the complicated interactions between general (theory) and practical (judgement). The contribution of this paper is to discuss the properties of practical wisdom and how they interact based on an interpretation of retirees' knowledge. The paper summarises in-depth face- to-face interviews with nine retirees, i.e., nine separate case studies. A structured interview guideline based on a conceptual framework derived from literature was used to examine the nature of retirees' practical wisdom. People with wisdom make better decisions. Whereas episteme's technical knowledge may address complicated tasks, techne's wisdom enables people to resolve truly complex tasks. Techne provides personal judgement which enables the professional to judge their actions from an external and internal perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Phronesis: Putting Some Meat on The
    ARISTOTLE’S PHRONESIS: PUTTING SOME MEAT ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF INNOVATION Gabriel J. Costello 1. Introduction Dante in the Divine Comedy describes his encounter with Aristotle as follows: “I saw the master sage of those who know” Inferno Canto IV, 131 (Dante, 1984 translation) . Dante considered Aristotle as epitomizing the pinnacle of human reason and his references to Aristotle came second only to that of the Bible. Without doubt, Aristotle is one of the most influential thinkers in the history of western civilisation. His works have covered an eclectic range of subjects such as logic ethics, metaphysics, politics, natural science and physics (ODE, 2006). Aristotle’s science was not superseded until the scientific revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries (ODS, 1999). Crithcley (2001) points out that among other things, ancient philosophy endeavoured to amalgamate knowledge and wisdom: “namely, that knowledge of how things were the way they were would lead to wisdom in the conduct of one’s life. The assumption that ties knowledge and wisdom together is the idea that the cosmos as such expresses a human purpose. This is called the “teleological view of the universe” (p. 7). This paper will focus on Aristotle’s ethical writings, especially examining his synthesis of the ideas of knowledge and wisdom and their application in practice. This he achieved through the concept of phronesis (phronēsis) variously described as practical wisdom. Taylor (2005) explains phronesis as having, in ancient Greece, connotations of intelligence and soundness of judgement. In his deliberations on ethics, Aristotle used the term to represent the complete excellence of the practical intellect.
    [Show full text]
  • Krisanna M. Scheiter
    Krisanna M. Scheiter 308 Lamont Building | Union College | 807 Union Street | Schenectady, NY 12308 Email: [email protected] | Phone: (518) 388-6380 Website: http://muse.union.edu/scheitek/ Current and Past Positions 2012-Present Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Union College 2014-2015 John D. MacArthur Assistant Professorship, Union College 2010- 2012 Fay Sawyier Predoctoral Fellow, Illinois Institute of Technology Areas of Specialization Ancient Philosophy, Philosophy of Emotion Areas of Competence Moral Psychology, Early Modern Philosophy Education 2005-2012 PhD Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania Dissertation: Emotion, Imagination, and Feeling in Aristotle Committee: Susan Sauvé Meyer (supervisor), Charles Kahn, Gary Hatfield, Elisabeth Camp Abstract: I argue that the emotions, for Aristotle, belong to the faculty of imagination (phantasia) and are best described as pleasurable or painful images (phantasmata). As such, an emotion is a cognivitive appraisal of something as good or bad, without reaching the level of intellect (nous) and so without requiring belief (doxa). 2003-2005 MA Philosophy, University of Missouri-St. Louis Thesis: Aristotle’s Active Intellect and the Primary Mover Committee: Jon McGinnis (supervisor), James Buickerood, Eric Wiland 1999-2002 BA English, University of Missouri-St. Louis, cum laude 1 Awards and Fellowships March 11, 2015 Loeb Classical Library Foundation Fellowship (2015-2016) (Award: $35,000) “The Loeb Classical Library Foundation awards fellowships to qualified scholars to support research,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Michael J. White Fall, 2011 Academic Addresses Sandra Day O'connor College of Law Box 877906 Arizona State
    CURRICULUM VITAE Michael J. White Fall, 2011 Academic Addresses Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Box 877906 Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287-7906, USA and. School of Life Sciences Box 874501 Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501, USA Telephones: law (480) 965-0105; SoLS (480) 965-0219 Fax numbers: law (480) 965-2427 E-mail: [email protected] Education B.A. Anthropology, Arizona State University, 1970 M.A. Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, 1972 C.Phil. Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, 1973 Ph.D. Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, 1974 Academic Appointments, Fellowships, and Grants Teaching Assistant, Philosophy Department, University of California San Diego, 1971-1974 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Arizona State University, 1974-1979 Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, 1976-1977 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Arizona State University, 1979-1985 Visiting Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Arizona, Fall, 1981 Professor of Philosophy, Arizona State University, 1985-present Fellow, National Humanities Center, 1988-1989 National Science Foundation Grant, “The Archaeology of Non-Archimedean Analysis,” 1997-1998 Professor of Law, Arizona State University, 2004-present Visiting Professor, University of Arizona, Spring 2009 1 Teaching Areas Ancient Philosophy, Science, and Mathematics Jurisprudence, Historical Jurisprudence, Social-Political Philosophy Formal Logic, including Modal and Tense Logic; Model Theory History and Philosophy of Mathematics and Physical Science History of Renaissance and Modern Philosophy, through Eighteenth Century Publications Books: Political Philosophy: A Historical Perspective. [Forthcoming: this will be revised edition of the Oneworld volume, listed immediately below, which is now out of print.] Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, Fall 2011 or Spring 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotelian Phronesis As a Key Factor for Leadership in the Knowledge-Creating Company According to Ikujiro Nonaka* Germán Scalzo** Guillermo Fariñas***
    ARISTOTELIAN PHRONESIS AS A KEY FACTOR FOR LEADERSHIP IN THE KNOWLEDGE-CREATING COMPANY ACCORDING TO IKUJIRO NONAKA* Germán Scalzo** Guillermo Fariñas*** * doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.cao31-57.apkfl. Reflection paper. Received: 28/04/2018 and accepted: 14/11/2018. Cite as: Scalzo, G., & Fariñas, G. (2018). Aristotelian phronesis as a key factor for leadership in the knowledge-creating company according to Ikujiro Nonaka. Cuadernos de Administración, 31(57), 19-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao31-57.apkfl. ** Universidad Panamericana, Mexico. E-mail: [email protected] *** Universidad Monteávila, Venezuela. E-mail: [email protected] Cuad. admon.ser.organ. Bogotá (Colombia), 31 (57): 19-44, julio-diciembre de 2018 | issn 0120-3592 / e-issn 1900-7205 19 Germán Scalzo, Guillermo Fariñas Aristotelian phronesis ABSTRACT. In the last decades, there has been an increasing interest on knowledge as a key factor for in the business realm. Japanese scholar Ikujiro Nonaka was among the main theoretical and practical contributors to knowledge creation in organizations, leadership in the as well as a promoter of including practical reason in the research of business knowledge-creating topics such as decision-making, knowledge management, ethics and leadership. company according to In his theory, a Western classical tradition, namely the virtue of phronesis, is Ikujiro Nonaka combined with the Japanese notion of Ba (context-based learning), to explain the way people engage in communities of practice as opportunities for learning. This paper describes his theory of knowledge creation, pointing to phronetic leadership skills as essential drivers of knowledge creation in organizations, in light of the Western classical tradition.
    [Show full text]