DOCSLIB.ORG

Krisanna M. Scheiter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Krisanna M. Scheiter 308 Lamont Building | Union College | 807 Union Street | Schenectady, NY 12308 Email: [email protected] | Phone: (518) 388-6380 Website: http://muse.union.edu/scheitek/ Current and Past Positions 2012-Present Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Union College 2014-2015 John D. MacArthur Assistant Professorship, Union College 2010- 2012 Fay Sawyier Predoctoral Fellow, Illinois Institute of Technology Areas of Specialization Ancient Philosophy, Philosophy of Emotion Areas of Competence Moral Psychology, Early Modern Philosophy Education 2005-2012 PhD Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania Dissertation: Emotion, Imagination, and Feeling in Aristotle Committee: Susan Sauvé Meyer (supervisor), Charles Kahn, Gary Hatfield, Elisabeth Camp Abstract: I argue that the emotions, for Aristotle, belong to the faculty of imagination (phantasia) and are best described as pleasurable or painful images (phantasmata). As such, an emotion is a cognivitive appraisal of something as good or bad, without reaching the level of intellect (nous) and so without requiring belief (doxa). 2003-2005 MA Philosophy, University of Missouri-St. Louis Thesis: Aristotle’s Active Intellect and the Primary Mover Committee: Jon McGinnis (supervisor), James Buickerood, Eric Wiland 1999-2002 BA English, University of Missouri-St. Louis, cum laude 1 Awards and Fellowships March 11, 2015 Loeb Classical Library Foundation Fellowship (2015-2016) (Award: $35,000) “The Loeb Classical Library Foundation awards fellowships to qualified scholars to support research, publication, and other projects in the area of classical studies.” 2014-2015 John D. MacArthur Assistant Professorship, Union College (Award: $3,000) “This appointment is awarded on a competitive basis to new and promising faculty who demonstrate talent and strength in teaching and scholarship” 2014 Faculty Resource Network Summer Scholar-in-Residence, New York University 2010 Fay Sawyier Pre-doctoral Teaching Fellowship, Illinois Institute of Technology 2010 Bacon Fellowship, University of Pennsylvania 2007 Bacon Fellowship, University of Pennsylvania 2005 Benjamin Franklin Fellowship, University of Pennsylvania Publications (2016) Ethics of Forgiveness and Revenge, Special issue of Philosophia, as guest editor. doi:10.1007/s11406-016-9720-0 (2013) Review of Aristotle on Desire by Giles Pearson, Notre Dame Philosophical Review 2013.04.32 (2012) “Images, Appearances, and Phantasia in Aristotle” Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, 57/3, pp. 251-278 (2010) “Aristotle on the Purpose of Revenge” in Sheila C. Bibb and Daniel Escandell Montiel (eds.) Best Served Cold: Studies on Revenge. Inter-Disciplinary Press (ebook). Works in Progress Emotion and Imagination in Plato and Aristotle (manuscript) Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment, Co-edited volume with Paula Satne, University of Manchester. Solicited by Springer. (proposal under review) “Does Aristotle have a Mathematical Model of Mind?” (under review) 2 “Honor, Worth, and Justified Revenge in Aristotle” (under review) “What is so Novel about Nous? Plato and Aristotle on Anaxagoras” “Why Anger is not a Tragic Emotion in Aristotle’s Poetics” Invited Talks and Presentations •“ Honor, Worth, and Justified Revenge in Aristotle.” Speaker Series. Marist College. Poughkeepsie, NY. February 2, 2018. (Scheduled) •“The Evils of Injustice: EN 5.11” Invited presentation to International Workshop on Justice in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics V.6-11. The Catholic University of America. Washington, D.C. October 13-14, 2017. •“Aristotle on Why Nous Cannot be a Magnitude: De Anima 1.3, 406b26-407b26”. Invited presentation for workshop on Aristotle's De Anima, Book I at the Anargyrios & Korgialenios School of Spetses. Isle of Spetses, Greece. August 2-6, 2017. •“Does Aristotle have a Mathematical Model of Mind?” Ancient Philosophy Workshop at Dartmouth College. June 18-19, 2017. •“ The Straight and the Sphere: A Point about Nous in DA 3.4.” 2017 CNY Ancient Philosophy Spring Workshop at Syracuse University. May 6, 2017. •“The Point of Nous in Aristotle (and What Plato Missed).” Invited Symposium session, Connections Between Late Plato and Aristotle, at the American Philosophical Association Central Division, Kansas City, MO, March 1-4, 2017. • “Aristotle’s Non-Sadistic, Non-Retributive Justification for Revenge.” Philosophy Colloquium at The State University of New York at Albany. October 28, 2016. • “Aristotle and Plato on Belief, Reason, and Desire.” Two talks presented to the Department of Philosophy at Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. May 24 and 27, 2016. • “Aristotle on Anger (Orge) and Revenge (Timoria).” Invited presentation for Aristotle on the Emotions Workshop hosted by the Institute for the History of Philosophy (IHP), Emory University, June 14-26, 2015. • “Political Friendship and Virtuous Vengeance in Aristotle” Joint Presentation with Cigdem Cidam, Assistant Professor in Political Science, Junior Faculty Works-in-Progress at Union College, April 29, 2015. • “The Significance of Anaxagoras’ Mind.” Penn Ancient Workshop on Anaxagoras. University of Pennsylvania. April 18, 2015. • “Nous Pathêtikos in Aristotle’s De Anima 3.5.” UCR Ancient Philosophy Conference on Ancient ethics, psychology, and epistemology. UC Riverside. April 10-11, 2015. • Comments on Symposium on Dhananjay Jagannathan’s “Aristotle on Practical Wisdom”, Pacific APA Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada. April 2-4, 2015. • Participant in “Seneca on Cruelty, Tyranny, and Liberty.” Liberty Fund. Mary J. Sirridge, Conference Director. The Grande Colonial, La Jolla, California. March 5 - 8, 2015 • “Greatness of Soul: Vices of Deficiency and Excess: EN IV.3 1125a16-35.” Presentation for International Workshop on Liberality and Magnanimity in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve. December 18-19, 2014. 3 • “Images, Appearances, and Phantasia in Aristotle.” Keynote address for the Louisiana State University Graduate Philosophy Conference. March 7-8, 2014 • “Fourth and Fifth Types of Seeming Courage: EN III. 8, 1117a9-28.” Invited presentation for Aristotle on the Virtues: Courage and Moderation: Reading Workshop on Nicomachean Ethics III.6-12. February 28-March 1, 2014 • “Aristotle’s Platonic Account of Emotion.” Queen’s University Philosophy Colloquium Series. January 23, 2014 • “Rethinking Nous Poiêtikos in Aristotle’s De Anima 3.5.” Central New York Humanities Corridor Working Group in Ancient Philosophy: Workshop on The Power and Objects of Knowledge. Syracuse University. October 26, 2013 • “Why Anger is not a Tragic Emotion for Aristotle.” Aristotle Symposium. The Ohio State University. April 7-8, 2012 Peer-Reviewed Conference Presentations • “Honor, Worth, and Justified Revenge in Aristotle.” Symposium Session at the American Philosophical Association Pacific Division, San Diego, CA, March 28-April 1, 2018. (Scheduled) • “Rethinking Nous Poiêtikos in Aristotle’s De Anima 3.5.” 37th Annual Ancient Philosophy Workshop. Temple University and University of Pennsylvania. April 5-6, 2014 • “Emotion, Imagination, and Belief in Aristotle.” Colloquium. Illinois Institute of Technology. October 28, 2011 • “Aristotle on the Faculty of Phantasia.” 29th Annual Joint Meeting of the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy and the Society for the Study of Islamic Philosophy, Fordham University, New York City, NY. October 21-23, 2011 • “Aristotle on Epithumia and Emotion.” APA Central Division, Minneapolis, MI. Commentator: George Rudebusch, Northern Arizona University. March 30-April 2, 2011 • “Aristotle on Classifying the Emotions.” Colloquium. Illinois Institute of Technology. November 12, 2010 • “A Theory of Pathos.” 28th Annual Joint Meeting of the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy and the Society for the Study of Islamic Philosophy, Fordham University, New York City, NY. October 15-17, 2010 • “Aristotle on the Purpose of Revenge.” The 1st Global Conference on Revenge Mansfield College, Oxford, UK. July 15-17, 2010 • “An Aristotelian Theory of Emotion.” 102nd Annual Meeting of the Southern Society of Philosophy and Psychology, Atlanta, GA. Commentator: Andrea Scarantino, Georgia State University. April 15-17, 2010 • “Aristotle on Pleasure, Pain and Emotion.” 61st Annual Northwest Philosophy Conference, Pacific University, Forest Grove, OR. October 23-24, 2009 • “Aristotle on Anger and Revenge.” 27th Annual Joint Meeting of the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy and the Society for the Study of Islamic Philosophy, Fordham University, New York City, NY. October 16-18, 2009 4 • “Aristotle and the Nous Poiêtikos.” 26th Annual Joint Meeting of the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy and the Society for the Study of Islamic Philosophy. Fordham University, New York City, NY. October 24-26, 2008 • “Aristotle on the Role of Phantasia in Memory.” Joint Session of the Aristotelian Society and the Mind Association, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland. July 11-13, 2008 • “Velleman on the Selectivity of Love.” 9th Annual Marquette Philosophy Graduate Student Association Conference The Philosophy of Love and Affectivity, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI. March 29, 2008 • “Shedding Light on Aristotle’s Light Analogy.” Athens Institute for Education and Research, 2nd International Conference on Philosophy, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. June 4-7, 2007 Campus and Departmental Service October 16-17, 2015 Organized International Reading Workshop on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics IV.5-9 2016-2017 Search
Recommended publications
  • The Philosophy of Happiness: an Interdisciplinary Introduction

    The Philosophy of Happiness: an Interdisciplinary Introduction

    “This outstanding book is the introduction to happiness many of us have been waiting for: Clear and accessible, engaging, and remarkably comprehensive. It covers not just the philosophy of happiness but also the science, economics, and policy side of happiness, as well as practical issues about how to be happier, and includes non-Western approaches as well. It is the single best overview of research on happiness, and I strongly recommend it both for the classroom and for researchers wanting to learn more about the field, as well as anyone wishing to understand the state of the art in thinking about happiness.” Daniel M. Haybron, Saint Louis University “An engaging and wide-ranging introduction to the study of happiness. The book’s perspective is philosophical, and it would be an excellent choice for philosophy courses in ethics or happiness itself. The philosophy here is enriched by well-informed discussions of research in psychology, neuroscience, and economics, which makes it a very fine choice for courses in any field where there is an interest in a philosopher’s take on happiness. Indeed, anyone with an interest in happiness—whether or not they are teaching or taking a course—would profit from reading this book. Highly recommended!” Valerie Tiberius, University of Minnesota THE PHILOSOPHY OF HAPPINESS Emerging research on the subject of happiness—in psychology, economics, and public policy—reawakens and breathes new life into long-standing philosophi- cal questions about happiness (e.g., What is it? Can it really be measured or pursued? What is its relationship to morality?). By analyzing this research from a philosophical perspective, Lorraine L.
  • Critical Inquiry As Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______

    Critical Inquiry As Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______

    ______________________________________________________________________________ Critical Inquiry as Virtuous Truth-Telling: Implications of Phronesis and Parrhesia ______________________________________________________________________________ Austin Pickup, Aurora University Abstract This article examines critical inquiry and truth-telling from the perspective of two comple- mentary theoretical frameworks. First, Aristotelian phronesis, or practical wisdom, offers a framework for truth that is oriented toward ethical deliberation while recognizing the contingency of practical application. Second, Foucauldian parrhesia calls for an engaged sense of truth-telling that requires risk from the inquirer while grounding truth in the com- plexity of human discourse. Taken together, phronesis and parrhesia orient inquirers to- ward intentional truth-telling practices that resist simplistic renderings of criticality and overly technical understandings of research. This article argues that truly critical inquiry must spring from the perspectives of phronesis and parrhesia, providing research projects that aim at virtuous truth-telling over technical veracity with the hope of contributing to ethical discourse and social praxis. Keywords: phronesis, praxis, parrhesia, critical inquiry, truth-telling Introduction The theme of this special issue considers the nature of critical inquiry, specifically methodological work that remains committed to explicit goals of social justice and the good. One of the central concerns of this issue is that critical studies have lost much of their meaning due to a proliferation of the term critical in educational scholarship. As noted in the introduction to this issue, much contemporary work in education research that claims to be critical may be so in name only, offering but methodological techniques to engage in critical work; techniques that are incapable of inter- vening in both the epistemological and ontological formations of normative practices in education.
  • Cultural Values and Happiness: an East–West Dialogue

    Cultural Values and Happiness: an East–West Dialogue

    The Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 141(4), 477–493 Cultural Values and Happiness: An East–West Dialogue LUO LU Graduate Institute of Behavioural Sciences Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan ROBIN GILMOUR Department of Psychology University of Lancaster, United Kingdom SHU-FANG KAO Graduate Institute of Behavioural Sciences Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan ABSTRACT. Happiness as a state of mind may be universal, but its meaning is complex and ambiguous. The authors directly examined the relationships between cultural values and experiences of happiness in 2 samples, by using a measurement of values derived from Chinese culture and a measurement of subjective well-being balanced for sources of happiness salient in both the East and the West. The participants were university stu- dents—439 from an Eastern culture (Taiwan) and 344 from a Western culture (the United Kingdom). Although general patterns were similar in the 2 samples, the relationships between values and happiness were stronger in the Taiwanese sample than in the British sample. The values social integration and human-heartedness had culture-dependent effects on happiness, whereas the value Confucian work dynamism had a culture-general effect on happiness. Key words: British university students, Eastern cultural values, happiness, Taiwanese uni- versity students, Western cultural values FOR CENTURIES, scholars in many disciplines have studied happiness, or sub- jective well-being (SWB), and have defined it in ethical, theological, political, economic, and psychological terms (Diener, 1984; Veenhoven, 1984). Happiness is currently defined (a) as a predominance of positive over negative affect and (b) as satisfaction with life as a whole (Argyle, Martin, & Crossland, 1989; Diener).
  • Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice

    Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice

    Phronesis, Artifacts and Leadership Practice Richard Halverson University of Wisconsin - Madison Abstract This paper develops Aristotle’s idea of phronesis, or practical wisdom, as a framework to access, represent and communicate the complexity of successful instructional leadership practice in schools. The design and use of artifacts, the tools leaders develop and implement in their practice, provide a window into the patterns of problem-setting and problem-solving that guide the expression of phronesis in school leadership. Introduction It has long been recognized that where you find good schools, you also often find the legacy of strong leadership. Prior research has defined many of the characteristics of schools with strong instructional programs, such as professional community grounded in instruction among teachers and leaders, a shared sense of instructional vision, group ownership of the instructional process and links between supervisory, assessment and instructional practices. 1 School leaders are responsible for the design and maintenance of these essential conditions in existing school systems.2 However, while we know quite a bit about the characteristics of such school communities, we know quite a bit less about how these characteristics develop together to become distinctive features of the school community. A strong professional community among teachers, for example, can either presuppose or help create group ownership of instructional process, which in turn may Submitted for publication: Please to not cite without the author’s permission 1 2 depend upon or generate the need for stronger internal linkages between assessment and instruction. The implementation and coordination of these conditions is an important aspect of improving student learning in schools.3 Accessing how school leaders understand and manage schools calls for a new approach to understanding the leadership practice.
  • Book Review F

    Book Review F

    Book Review F. J. Mootz III and G. H. Taylor, eds. Gadamer and Ricoeur: Critical Horizons for Contemporary Hermeneutics (New York/London: Continuum, 2011), 297 pp. Marc-Antoine Vallée EHESS (Paris) Études Ricœuriennes / Ricœur Studies, Vol 3, No 2 (2012), pp. 171-173 ISSN 2155-1162 (online) DOI 10.5195/errs.2012.153 http://ricoeur.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. Book Review F. J. Mootz III and G. H. Taylor, eds. Gadamer and Ricoeur: Critical Horizons for Contemporary Hermeneutics (New York/London: Continuum, 2011), 297 pp. Five years ago, it was totally impossible to find a book entirely dedicated to a systematic study of the complex relations between the hermeneutics of Gadamer and Ricoeur. This was quite surprising if we consider the importance of these two philosophers to the development of a hermeneutical philosophy over the last century. Fortunately, it seems that the relevance of a critical discussion on Gadamer’s and Ricoeur’s hermeneutics has recently become more obvious, first with the publication of Daniel Frey’s book on L’interprétation et la lecture chez Ricoeur et Gadamer (2008), and now with this initiative of Francis J. Mootz III and George H. Taylor to bring into conversation "Gadamerian and Ricoeurian scholars" in one volume. The result of this well- inspired idea is a book containing twelve chapters studying, from different perspectives, the agreements and disagreements between Gadamer’s and Ricoeur’s philosophies, not without significant convergences and divergences between the authors.
  • Classical Methods for the Modern Lawyer

    Classical Methods for the Modern Lawyer

    CLASSICAL METHODS FOR THE MODERN LAWYER: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN ETHICS, MORALITY AND EFFICACY IN THE TRANSACTIONAL CONTEXT Gerald T. Nowak, P.C. PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE: DRAFTING AND NEGOTIATING CORPORATE AGREEMENTS 2011 Chicago, Illinois -- February 10, 2011 K&E 14501746.2 Gerald T. ("Jerry") Nowak is a corporate partner in the Chicago office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. He has a broad transactional practice, including capital markets transactions, M&A transactions and corporate governance matters. His capital markets practice focuses on complex securities matters, including initial public offerings, high yield offerings, spin-offs, tender offers and investment grade debt offerings. His M&A practice includes public and private acquisitions for private equity funds and public companies. He holds a B.A. from Michigan State University, an M.B.A from Auburn University and a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School, none of which are in philosophy. ii K&E 14501746.2 I. INTRODUCTION A. Ethics, Morality and Efficacy As lawyers, we are bound by a code of ethics that regulates both what we do and how we do it. There are any number of technical rules that govern a lawyer’s behavior, from rules limiting lawyer advertising to rules regulating conflicts of interest, and, apropos to this article, rules regulating how we conduct ourselves in transactional negotiations. Much of the substance of the ethical rules can be summed up by the Cub Scout’s exhortation to “do your best” and “tell the truth.” The rules that govern a lawyer’s behavior are commonly referred to as “legal ethics” or the “ethical rules.” This nomenclature can be confusing to those of us who, prior to being taught otherwise, tended to conflate “ethics” with “morality.” At least in the legal arena, the two bear only a passing resemblance to one another.
  • Management Education from Episteme to Phronesis: the Contribution of French Didactic Theory Corinne Hahn, Christophe Vignon

    Management Education from Episteme to Phronesis: the Contribution of French Didactic Theory Corinne Hahn, Christophe Vignon

    Management education from episteme to phronesis: The contribution of French didactic theory Corinne Hahn, Christophe Vignon To cite this version: Corinne Hahn, Christophe Vignon. Management education from episteme to phronesis: The contribu- tion of French didactic theory. Management Learning, SAGE Publications, 2019, 50 (3), pp.337-354. 10.1177/1350507619831118. halshs-02068936 HAL Id: halshs-02068936 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02068936 Submitted on 25 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Management education from episteme to phronesis: The contribution of French didactic theory Corinne Hahn ESCP Europe Christophe Vignon University of Rennes 1, France Abstract In this article, we review some of the criticisms levelled at current management education provided by business schools and the recommendations made by critical management studies scholars. These authors generally recommend placing greater emphasis on phronesis, that is, the manager’s practical wisdom. We investigated this path and formulated a practical solution, rooted in the operational framework provided by French didactic theory. It takes the form of a specific pedagogical device, the aim of which is to foster closer connections between experience acquired in professional settings and theoretical knowledge derived from management sciences.
  • Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Quarter 2 - Module 8: the Meaning of His/Her Own Life

    Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Quarter 2 - Module 8: the Meaning of His/Her Own Life

    Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Regional Office IX, Zamboanga Peninsula 12 Zest for Progress Zeal of Partnership Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Quarter 2 - Module 8: The Meaning of His/Her Own Life Name of Learner: ___________________________ Grade & Section: ___________________________ Name of School: ___________________________ WHAT I NEED TO KNOW? An unexamined life is a life not worth living (Plato). Man alone of all creatures is a moral being. He is endowed with the great gift of freedom of choice in his actions, yet because of this, he is responsible for his own freely chosen acts, his conduct. He distinguishes between right and wrong, good and bad in human behavior. He can control his own passions. He is the master of himself, the sculptor of his own life and destiny. (Montemayor) In the new normal that we are facing right now, we can never stop our determination to learn from life. ―Kung gusto nating matuto maraming paraan, kung ayaw naman, sa anong dahilan?‖ I shall present to you different philosophers who advocated their age in solving ethical problems and issues, besides, even imparted their age on how wonderful and meaningful life can be. Truly, philosophy may not teach us how to earn a living yet, it can show to us that life is worth existing. It is evident that even now their legacy continues to create impact as far as philosophy and ethics is concerned. This topic: Reflect on the meaning of his/her own life, will help you understand the value and meaning of life since it contains activities that may help you reflect the true meaning and value of one’s living in a critical and philosophical way.
  • International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009

    International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009

    International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009 Editorial Werner Fricke, Øyvind Pålshaugen 5 Popular Education and Participatory Research: Facing Inequalities in Latin America Danilo R. Streck 13 Organizing – A Strategic Option for Trade Union Renewal? Klaus Dörre, Hajo Holst, Oliver Nachtwey 33 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby 68 Opening to the World through the Lived Body: Relating Theory and Practice in Organisation Consulting Robert Farrands 114 Book review Olav Eikeland (2008): The Ways of Aristotle. Aristotelian phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research reviewed by Ole Fogh Kirkeby 144 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby In this article, the Greek concept of phronesis is analyzed on the basis of its philosophical roots, and the indispensability of its strong normative content is emphasized. This creates a distance to most of the recent under- standing of phronesis as prudence, and hence as practical wisdom with a pragmatic and strategic content. The strong dilemmas created by the nor- mative background of real phronesis present management and leadership as a choice in every situation. From this foundation, phronesis is inter- preted as primarily the sense of the event, and an alternative concept of the event is developed. The presentation of the event also demands a theory of the relation of mind and matter, and hence of the body in the event. This is achieved under inspiration from Stoic philosophy. With this in mind, the more serious approaches to practical wisdom: phronesis as determinant of meta-concepts of research; phronesis as a liberating organizational strategy of learning; phronesis as a strategy of knowledge management; phronesis as a narrative strategy; and phronesis as the capacity of the leader, are presented and analyzed.
  • Philosophy of Happiness Regents Professor Julia Annas

    Philosophy of Happiness Regents Professor Julia Annas

    Philosophy 220: Philosophy of Happiness Regents Professor Julia Annas. MWF 1 – 1.50 pm. Chavez 301. The course has a D2L website, where all the readings are to be found. My office is Social Science Building 123. Office hours TBA. The Philosophy Department office is Social Sciences Building 213. Why happiness? Happiness matters!. There are large numbers of self-help books telling us how to be happy. Some nations are planning to measure the happiness of their citizens to find out how it can be increased. There is a huge field of ‘happiness studies’, and focus on happiness in positive psychology as well as politics and law. Much of this is confusing, since it’s often not clear what the authors think happiness is. Is it feeling good? Is it having a positive attitude to the way you are now? Is it having a positive attitude to your life as a whole? Is it having a happy life? How can some people advise others on how to be happy? Philosophers have explored happiness, and our search for happiness, for two thousand years. They have asked what happiness is, and have developed different answers, including some now being rediscovered. In this course we will ask what happiness is, and look at major answers. We’ll look at rich philosophical traditions of thinking about happiness, and also at some recent work in the social sciences. We’ll examine the contributions being made to the ongoing search to find out what happiness is, and how we can live happy lives. Course Readings Course readings will be available on the D2L site.
  • May 2021 PAULA LOUISE GOTTLIEB Department of Philosophy 5185 Helen C

    May 2021 PAULA LOUISE GOTTLIEB Department of Philosophy 5185 Helen C

    May 2021 PAULA LOUISE GOTTLIEB Department of Philosophy 5185 Helen C. White Hall 600 North Park Street University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263 0253 (office) (608) 265 3701 (fax) [email protected] (e-mail) gottlieb.philosophy.wisc.edu (web site) Present Position: Full Professor of Philosophy and Affiliate Professor of Classical and Near Eastern Studies Education: St. Hilda’s College, Oxford University, England 1977-83: B.A. Hons. in Literae Humaniores (Ancient Greek and Latin Literature; Philosophy and Ancient Greek and Roman History) 1981 B.Phil. in Philosophy (Moral and Political Philosophy, Philosophical Logic and Aristotle) 1983 M.A. 1986 Cornell University 1983-88: M.A. in Philosophy 1986 Ph.D. in Philosophy 1988 Areas of Specialization: Ancient Greek Philosophy; Ethics B.Phil. Thesis: “Some Problems of Akrasia in Aristotle and Modern Writers” Main Supervisor: M. J. Woods; also Susan Hurley Doctoral Dissertation: “Aristotle and the Measure of All Things” Committee: T. H. Irwin (main supervisor), Gail Fine, David Lyons and Sydney Shoemaker Employment: Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Fall 1988-Spring 1994 Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Summer 1994-Fall 1999 Full Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, from Fall 1999 1 Honors and Awards: Oxford: Open Exhibition, 1977-81 Christina Keith Travel Prize (awarded by the college), 1979 Postgraduate College Scholarship, 1981-83 Cornell: Sage Graduate Fellowship, 1983-84 Martin McVoy Trust Fellowship, 1987-88 Messenger-Chalmers prize for “the doctoral dissertation giving evidence of the best research and most fruitful thought” in the Humanities (University-wide, Cornell University, 1989) Honorable mention in the Guilford Prize for the best-written dissertation (University- wide, Cornell University, 1989) University nomination for a National Endowment for the Humanities summer stipend, 1991.
  • An Aristotelian Interpretation of Practical Wisdom: the Case of Retirees

    An Aristotelian Interpretation of Practical Wisdom: the Case of Retirees

    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Business - Papers Faculty of Business January 2019 An Aristotelian interpretation of practical wisdom: the case of retirees Peter R. Massingham University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/buspapers Recommended Citation Massingham, Peter R., "An Aristotelian interpretation of practical wisdom: the case of retirees" (2019). Faculty of Business - Papers. 1640. https://ro.uow.edu.au/buspapers/1640 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] An Aristotelian interpretation of practical wisdom: the case of retirees Abstract This paper aims to improve understanding of the concept of practical wisdom. The theoretical lens used is Aristotle's practical rationality or 'phronesis'. Researchers argue that practical wisdom should be used as an organising framework for professional knowledge. Aristotle believed that practical wisdom as the highest intellectual virtue. Phronesis is the complicated interactions between general (theory) and practical (judgement). The contribution of this paper is to discuss the properties of practical wisdom and how they interact based on an interpretation of retirees' knowledge. The paper summarises in-depth face- to-face interviews with nine retirees, i.e., nine separate case studies. A structured interview guideline based on a conceptual framework derived from literature was used to examine the nature of retirees' practical wisdom. People with wisdom make better decisions. Whereas episteme's technical knowledge may address complicated tasks, techne's wisdom enables people to resolve truly complex tasks. Techne provides personal judgement which enables the professional to judge their actions from an external and internal perspective.