Preliminary Existing Conditions (Draft)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Existing Conditions (Draft) Kaysville General Plan Update PRELIMINARY EXISTING CONDITIONS (DRAFT) 20 July 2020 Kaysville General Plan Update Preliminary Land Use, Housing and Demographic Conditions/Projections MAP X.X - EXISTING LAND USE Single Family Residential Multifamily Residential Manufactured Homes Industrial/Business Park Mutton Hollow Road Commercial Civic/Institutional Education Religious Utilities Agriculture Parks Open Space Cemetery Crestwood Road Open/Vacant/Agricultural Land City Boundary U.S. 89 U.S. 200 North Lakes/Ponds Flint Street Flint Streams/Canals Wetlands Main Street Main Trails Railroads 50 West 50 Main Street Sunset Drive Sunset Burton Lane Western Drive Shepard Lane 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles ± Preliminary Demographic Conditions and Projections Population Projections: Four sources provide population projections for 2050 in Kaysville. The population difference between the high and low projections is 4,081. Determining which population projection to use will assist in determining how many housing units are needed and their mix. The June 2019 financial report indices a build-out population would be reached in the next 20 years and would be about 42,000. 2050 Population Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Households 1. TAZ DATA (WFRC) 32,238 33,800 36,263 39,133 13,287 2. Governor’s Office of Management & Budget 27,300 32,500 35,465 37,261 40,623 10,649 3. Water System IFFP (LYRB) 27,708 32,103 35,416 39,121 43,214 11,328 4. Kaysville City Financial Report, June 2019 42,000 42,000 11,010 AVERAGE 27,504 32,280 34,894 38,661 41,242 10,812 • Following discussions with city staff, a future population size of 42,000 was determined for use in projections. Persons per Household: The 2019 TAZ person per household estimate was 3.39. According to the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS), Kaysville currently has an average household size of 3.81. The TAZ 2050 population projections estimate that there will be 13,287 households, which is 2.95 persons per household. These household counts include TAZ at their published household projection and the other population sources at the 2019 ACS persons per household amount (3.81). • Following discussions with city staff, a future household size of 3.65 persons per household was determined. Densities and Agricultural Land Projections: Based on census data and building permits, it is estimated that there are 8,039 single family homes and 623 multi-family units in Kaysville at present, for a total of 8,662 housing units. There is a total of 5,878 acres of land in the city at present, of which 467-520 acres are undeveloped/vacant. Datasets that were generated indicate a disparity in the amount of vacant land and the division of land based on use and/or zoning. An additional 4,625 units is required to meet the 2050 TAZ household projection (SF: 4,144.71 and MF: 480 with the current housing mix). Aligning existing housing units according to the existing single family to multi-family mix and present density levels per acre will not accommodate the projected number of households by TAZ to be realized on land that is currently vacant and zoned for such uses. Based on Davis County land use data - but not including common area spaces - there are an average of 2.58 units/acre for single family homes and approximately 8.11 multi- family units/acre. It is likely that the agriculture residential lots skew the single-family ratio lower. • In order to meet housing demands, it is likely that land zoned agricultural will be rezoned residential. Determining the long-term land use and density of existing agricultural land will be determined during the next stage of assessment (development of alternatives/ selection of a preferred alternatives). • In order to meet long-term projections, density levels will likely need to be increased, especially near transit, arterial roads and in re-development areas. Determining the densities for future development areas will be determined during the next stage of assessment (development of alternatives/selection of a preferred alternative). Kaysville Land Use Total Total % % Net Undeveloped (Davis County Land Total Area Total Acres Developed Undeveloped Developed Undeveloped Acres (80%) Use Data) Acres Acres Single Family 152,085,384 3,491 89.39% 10.61% 3,121 370 296 Multi Family 15,168,028 348 82.47% 17.53% 287 61 49 Commercial 10,497,524 241 85.34% 14.66% 206 35 28 Industrial 5,315,627 122 100.00% 0.00% 122 - - Agriculture 20,651,796 474 100.00% 0.00% 474 - Other (church, government, school, hospital) 52,339,518 1,202 100.00% 0.00% 1,202 - Total Acreage 5,878 5,878 5,412 467 373 Kaysville Land Use Total Total % % Net Undeveloped (Landmark Design Total Area Total Acres Developed Undeveloped Developed Undeveloped Acres (80%) Zoning Data) Acres Acres Single Family 128,021,098 2,939 99.66% 0.34% 2,929 10 8 Multi Family 70,121,146 1,610 81.67% 18.33% 1,315 295 236 Commercial 15,494,292 356 95.72% 4.28% 340 15 12 Industrial 2,243,340 52 79.79% 20.21% 41 10 8 Agriculture 38,329,315 880 78.79% 21.21% 693 187 149 Other (church, government, school, hospital) 1,848,686 42 93.28% 6.72% 40 3 2 Total Acreage 5,878 5,878 5,358 520 416 Kaysville General Plan Update Preliminary Transportation Existing Conditions Preliminary Transportation Existing Conditions This existing transportation conditions report is comprised of three sections: the various “layered” transportation mode networks; analysis of communitywide street and pathway connectivity; and analysis of the multimodal accessibility and characteristics of Kaysville’s activity centers. Networks Major streets The Kaysville Major Streets Plan designates a network of major streets by functional classification. Streets designated as “Principal Arterial” include I-15, US 89; streets designated as “Minor Arterial” include Main Street and 200 North; and streets designated as “Collector” include Fairfield Drive, Burton Lane, Flint/Sunset, Angel Street, and Shepard Lane. In addition, several streets designated “Significant Local:” Webb Lane, Smith Lane, Old Mill, Deseret Drive, Western Drive, Seabiscuit Drive, 600 W. Street, 300 W./600 N. Street, Mutton Hollow, Laurelwood Drive, 50 W. Street, Frontage Road, Crestwood Road, Thornfield Road, and 500 E. Street. Figure X shows the major streets throughout Kaysville. Kaysville is bisected by existing and planned regionally significant corridors. Existing corridors managed by the Utah Department of Transportation include: • Interstate 15, which runs through the middle of the city and divides it east-west; • US-89, which only runs through a small corner of the city in the east but serves the city’s eastern neighborhoods; and 1 • SR 273 (Main Street), which is one of the city’s only major surface streets and its main downtown north- south corridor. The West Davis Corridor is a planned freeway at the western edge of Kaysville. Two exits are planned in/near Kaysville, at the end of 200 North/Schick Lane and at the far southern tip of the city near the end of Sunset Drive. In addition, UDOT is constructing a new U.S. 89 interchange at 200 North, which is in Fruit Heights but will serve Kaysville. Figures X through X show typical existing cross sections for the two most important surface streets in Kaysville: Main Street and 200 North. These corridors run the length of the city from north to south (Main Street) and east to west (200 North). In particular, 200 North provides the only street connection across town from east to west, and one of the only crossings of I-15. As such, their design helps to “set the tone” of the city. These corridors, especially 200 North, change significantly over the course of their length, adding lanes as they approach downtown and the I-15 interchange and narrowing as they reach the edges of town. However, they don’t always respond to their context. In downtown, for example, both Main Street and 200 North have more of a highway design than a walkable downtown street, with the vast majority of their width devoted to moving traffic and not people space. For example, on Main Street, only 21 percent or about one-fifth, of the total street right-of-way is devoted to person space. Meanwhile 60 percent of the right-of-way is devoted to moving traffic. And, in general, for the unique citywide connection they provide, these corridors do not serve all modes to enough of a degree. Outside of the historic downtown area, the pedestrian realm is only 6 to 7 feet, even though these are still mixed-use activity centers in Kaysville. 2 3 4 Auto There are a few key points and corridors for traffic in Kaysville. These include 1) the regional highways that provide access to and from Kaysville to the Wasatch Front; 2) the interchanges that are the access points to these regional highways; and 3) major surface streets that are a mix of UDOT and locally managed. The regional highways move people north and south. The primary regional highway is I-15, which bisects Kaysville, with US 89 at the community’s far eastern end and the West Davis Corridor planned for the far western end. The key interchanges are at I-15 and 200 North; US 89 and 200 North (even though it is just outside Kaysville, in Fruit Heights); and the two planned West Davis Corridor interchanges at 200 North and near Sunset Lane. For the surface streets, the primary traffic corridor is 200 North, which provides a rare east-west connection and links three of the highway interchanges.
Recommended publications
  • The Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market
    THE GREATER SALT LAKE AREA MULTIFAMILY MARKET THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE MULTIFAMILY REPORT | 2019 REVIEW + 2020 OUTLOOK PREFACE TABLE OF CBRE is pleased to release the 2020 Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market Report, the most current and comprehensive CONTENTS multifamily data available for the Salt Lake Area/Wasatch Front market. Produced by Eli Mills and Patrick Bodnar of CBRE, this report has been assembled to empower the decision making of multifamily professionals active in the Utah market. This report has been prepared with current data sourced from a survey of over half the multifamily market (60,000+ units) along the Wasatch Front Area inclusive of Salt Lake, Utah, Davis and Weber Counties. Minimum reporting requirements were identified for each city and county by class, type and size. Data contributions and validations to this publication were made by: • CBRE Research • Utah Department of Economics • CBRE Econometric Advisors • University of Utah Bureau of Economics and Business Research • Yardi Matrix • Construction Monitor • Axiometrics • CoStar • Western States Multifamily Whatever your multifamily needs may be, please reach out to us. CBRE has the most comprehensive data on the market and can provide information on a macro or micro level based on class, city, submarket, zip code, location, age, size, proximity to rail stops, and many other variations. CBRE consistently leads the market, with national multifamily investment sales totaling over $33.3 billion in 2019 (Source: Real Capital Analytics). As the leader in multifamily sales every year since 2001, the exposure of CBRE is second-to-none. With 65 locations and over 300 multifamily professionals, including direct lending services, CBRE’s unparalleled multifamily platform has a competitive presence in Utah and an enhanced investment reach into the multifamily space, providing our clients with the greatest market exposure available.
    [Show full text]
  • Meadow View Phase 2, Farmington, Utah
    Meadow View Phase 2, Farmington, Utah Built for the Way You Want to Live! www.MeadowViewUtah.com Great Farmington Location Meadow View Phase 2 is conveniently located in Farmington within 1 mile of the new Station Park shopping district and the Farmington UTA Frontrunner station. Leave your car at home and enjoy a comfortable trip into downtown Salt Lake City for work or play. Enjoy the open air living of Meadow View with panoramic views on large basement lots with the amenities of Station Park—shopping, restaurants, parks and schools all less than two miles away. For more information, or a personal tour contact: Sarah Mayer 801.218.2885 [email protected] Model Home coming soon! Get news and updates Watch video tours on Facebook on YouTube Information is subject to change without notice. © ClearWater Homes. All rights reserved. Front Porch Lighting Front Porch Get More For Your Dollar Panoramic 2-Tone Paint Window Walls Expansive Low-E Energy Efficient Windows 6 Inch Wooden Base Boards Window Sills Pendant Lighting * Energy Efficient Lighting 6 Inch Trim Shaker Panel Beech Cabinets 8 Foot Doors On Main Floor 42” Upper Cabinets Moen Fixtures With Crown Molding Transom Window * Stainless Steel Sink Kwikset Satin Nickel Hardware Luxury Laminate Wood Floors 3cm Granite Countertops Stainless Steel Appliances Trash Pull Out “*” Optional Upgrade Items 42” Shower with Cultured Marble Surround Oversized Kohler Soaker Bathtub Generous 5-Piece Master Baths 3cm Granite Counters Moen Fixtures Tile Floors Shaker Panel Beech Cabinets Built to Conserve Energy An energy efficient home is a more comfortable home. Insulation is a critical component to an energy efficient home and Clearwater Homes implements several techniques into our building process to ensure maximum insulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's 2011-2040 Unified Transportation Plan
    2011 - 2040 udot.utah.gov 131949.indd 1 7/31/13 2:23 PM UTah’S UNifieD PLaN ParTNerS CaChe MPO 179 North Main, Suite 305 Logan, UT 84321 (435) 716-7154 www.cachempo.org Dixie MPO 1070 West 1600 South, Bldg. B St. George, UT 84770 (435) 673-3548 www.dixiempo.org MOUNTaiNLaND aSSOCiaTiON Of GOverNMeNTS 586 east 800 North Orem, UT 84097 (801) 229-3800 www.mountainland.org UTah DeParTMeNT Of TraNSPOrTaTiON Systems Planning and Programming 4501 South 2700 West – Box 143600 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 (801) 965-4129 www.udot.utah.gov UTah TraNSiT aUThOriTy 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 262-5626 www.rideuta.com WaSaTCh frONT reGiONaL COUNCiL 295 North Jimmy Doolittle road Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (801) 363-4250 www.wfrc.org 131949.indd 2 7/31/13 2:23 PM TaBLe Of CONTeNTS introduction 2 - Letter from the Chairs of the Utah Transportation Commission and Utah’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) - Letter from the Directors of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and Utah’s MPOs - Purpose of Unified Transportation Planning UDOT’s Long range Plan 8 Utah MPO Long range Plans 12 - Wasatch Choices 2040 (Weber, Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties) - envision Cache valley (Cache County) - vision Dixie (Washington County) Utah’s Population Growth Challenge 16 Utah’s Project Planning & funding Process 20 - Project Development Process - Utah’s Transportation Needs and Preferences - financial Plan and assumptions - Continuous, Cooperative and Comprehensive Planning highway Projects by region 34 regionally important Transportation Projects 34 Utah highway Projects Map 35 highway Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 36- 41 highway Projects Phase Two (2021-2030) 42-46 highway Projects Phase Three (2031-2040) 47-50 highway Projects Unfunded 51 -52 Cache valley highway Projects Map 53 Wasatch front Ogden/Layton area highway Projects Map 54 Wasatch front Salt Lake valley highway Projects Map 55 Utah valley area highway Projects Map 56 Dixie area highway Projects Map 57 Transit Projects by region 58 Transit Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 59.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Solar Home Tours Begin This Weekend in Davis County Memorial Day Events Bulk Purchase Makes Solar
    L OCAL N EWS • P EOPLE • B USINESS • S CHOOLS • S PORTS • E VENTS See Inside DavisThe Clipper 75 cents THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2015 ADVERTISMENT Utah Solar Home Tours begin this weekend in Davis County Memorial Day events Bulk purchase makes solar BECKY GINOS LOUISE R. SHAW, A1 affordable for homeowners Last year, over 24 million solar panels were installed in the United States. Still, many Race unites homeowners are still wondering if solar really works, if it makes families fi nancial sense, and how those who’ve put solar panels to work Annual 5K offers in their homes and businesses support for grieving feel about it. Now, Davis County residents families, friends. can fi nd out from their neigh- LOUISE R. SHAW, C1 bors and peers. The Utah Solar Home Tour, featuring locations about Davis, Weber and Cache Counties, runs this Friday and “We can match any home and Saturday. Friday hours are 4 to 8 any budget to make solar work for Tour of p.m., with Saturday tour hours 10 everyone,” Shipley said. a.m. to 4 p.m. The tour is hosted There is a deadline, as bulk by the Intermountain Community purchasing ends on June 30. Utah coming Shipley said solar is an investment The federal incentives for solar is hosting a solar workshop to Solar Initiative. power conversion are currently 30 provide answers to basic ques- “This is a great opportunity for “better than any stock or mutual Cycling event stage fund you could put your money percent, and there are state incen- tions and educate attendees about people to go and see real homes tives as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments from Draft 2015-2040 Scenario – Summer 2013
    6/11/2014 Comments from Draft 2015-2040 Scenario – Summer 2013 Comment WFRC Process Category Key: Key - (1)Highway Comment Comment Meeting Name of Commenter Comment Comment Date (2)Transit Was: WFRC Response Number Location (3)Bike (7)Accepted (4)Land Use (8)Not (5)Other Accepted Weber UDOT Region I Planning How do we rectify existing and currently WFRC takes the existing zoning and tries to fit it into the various 1 County Office planned zoning with what we think it will be 5/3/2013 4 7 scenarios. Open House Weber UDOT West Davis Is there any measure of delay for transit WFRC looks for what people can access within 20 minutes using 2 County Highway EIS Team users? How much time is spent waiting on 5/3/2013 2 7 transit. Open House connections? Weber Davis County Planning What are the average minutes of delay per The minutes of delay per person are about the same in each ‘Vision’ 3 County person in the scenarios? That would be a 5/3/2013 5 7 scenario and less so in the current trend scenario. Open House better measure of performance. Weber UTA Planning Office Why did the most dense land use in Scenario Seventy percent of the land use is already set with existing 4 County T only save 4 million miles per day of VMT 5/3/2013 4 7 development. Open House compared to baseline? Weber UDOT West Davis What is the shift in mode share between The mode split for transit rises from 4% to 6%.
    [Show full text]
  • Weber, Davis Box Elder & County System Map Legend
    630 I 84 Highway 89 Weber, Davis& Box Elder County System Map 2000 West St August 2019 Pleasant View Pleasant View Dr North Ogden Highway 89 Plain City Ogden Cyn 616 612 630 2600 N State Hwy 134 2550 N 1050 E 2200 N 613 I 84 I Farr 612 616 400 E Route 645 uses 30th West Street between Monroe 1500 N Harrisville Blvd. and Harrison Blvd. and Harrison Blvd. 4650 W between 30th and 36th Street Pioneer Rd 2000 W 630 645 1900 W 612 613 Ogden Marriott-slaterville F618 2nd St 608 608 625 Downtown Ogden Transfer Location 616 F618 26th Street and Grant Avenue 12th St 473 603 612 1200 South St State Hwy 39 Wall Ave 608 613 Washington Blvd Ogden Station 606 630 F618 606 616 455 470 473 645 20th St 625 601 603 604 State Hwy 104 455 613 613 616 630 24th St Route 455 uses 603 28th Street between Route 650 only stops at theWSU O gden 650 F618 606 606 473 Wall Avenue and Campus and the Ogden Station Washington Blvd FrontRunner 645 WSU is only serviced by select Route 473 1900 W FrontRunner 30th St 625 Trips when WSU is in Regular Fall and Winter 650 455 Semester Class Session. West Haven 612 604 3300 S 603 Hooper State Hwy 53 630 Roy Station 650 650 630 604 FrontRunner State Hwy 79 Parker Dr Midland4000 Dr S Weber State University 640 Harrison Blvd Airport Rd 630 455 473 603 625 604 640 470 645 Us Hwy 89 South 630 640 645 650 603 Ogden Harrison Blvd 5900 W 5900 Roy Riverdale Rd 612 Washington 455 5500 S St West 3500 Riverdale 625 5600 S 604 1900 St West Terrace 626 FrontRunner Riverdale 625 472 Park & Ride Lot Clinton 626 472 Uintah 473 Sunset South Weber
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Case Studies of Orenco Station TOD and Station Park
    Final report Comparative Case Studies: Trip and Parking Generation at Orenco Station TOD, Portland Region and Station Park TAD, Salt Lake City Region Reid Ewing, Guang Tian, and Keunhyun Park College of Architecture + Planning, University of Utah Preston Stinger Fehr & Peers Associates John Southgate John Southgate LLC Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge financial support for this study from the Utah Department of Transportation and logistical support from the main developers of Orenco Station and Station Park, the Holland Property Group and CenterCal Properties. We also wish to acknowledge review comments and approval of this report by the Metropolitan Research Center’s Technical Advisory Committee: Diego Carroll – WSP Jeff Harris – Utah Department of Transportation Ted Knowlton – Wasatch Front Regional Council G.J. LaBonty – Utah Transit Authority Sarah Munro – University Neighborhood Partners Andrea Olson – Parametrix Christine Richman – GSBS Consultants Jack Robinson – Sorenson Impact Center Preston Stinger – Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultant Wilf Sommerkorn – Salt Lake County 2 Chapter 1. Introduction This report presents comparative case studies, defined as “the analysis and synthesis of the similarities, differences and patterns across two or more cases that share a common focus or goal in a way that produces knowledge that is easier to generalize about causal questions” (Goodrick, 2014: 1). This follows earlier case studies by the authors at five exemplary transit-oriented developments (TODs) across the U.S.: Redmond TOD in Seattle; Rhode Island Row in Washington D.C.; Fruitvale Village in San Francisco-Oakland; Englewood TOD in Denver; and Wilshire/Vermont in Los Angeles (Ewing et al. 2016). The subject of this sixth case study is Orenco Station, on the west side of the Portland metropolitan area in the suburban city of Hillsboro, OR.
    [Show full text]
  • October 4, 2016 CONFIDENTIAL Submitted Pursuant to Rule 408 Federal Rules of Evidence Mr. Mark Y. Hirata Assistant Attorney Gene
    I l I I I ill I lour ),111 I Cite. I ,tdr.,1 I I Ilan? NH/ 1900(1 \\ 21' coil] October 4, 2016 k Cal 1q0,1 Scinnicl CONFIDENTIAL Dial/ II" Submitted pursuant to Rule 408 S114111'111, 1)1,1,1,1' 1&,,incy I'm 4,7 Federal Rules of Evidence Kichar I. 111(1101 ;II 111,,I,2 1),1111CI 11 11111 Mr. Mark Y. Hirata Mr. Stewart Young ( rum111,.. A. .Inhnsan Assistant Attorney General Assistant Attorney General 111170h:1111 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Sc'011 A 01 185 South State Street, Suite 300 185 South State Street, Suite 300 ncr L. Iit,t)11C1 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 ,I111 1)1111.101? flali,1 I Mr. Stewart C. Walz /'thin 11ill,,1- Senior Litigation Counsel .111,1111] 1,) . 1 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 1 ,1,,,I,J11 1 85 South State Street, Suite 300 S ho bc II" Thmnp,m1 Gentlemen: 11 .11\711111 . 11 1:111 /1‘11 A Cillh1111 I. 16'1, In August 2014, the State of Utah's Office of Legislative Auditor released its audit Ri11,11C1' IIIR.1110P1 ("Legislative Audit") of the Utah Transit Authority ("UTA" or the "Authority"). The Audit identified several areas where the lack of adequate institutional controls .1 and oversight led to problematic actions taken by the Authority. I' ( I WI )1111g In the past several years, UTA has taken many steps to address its previous ,V,111hIll .1 I 1;HW organizational weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 455 Snow Routing
    Ogden Ogden 17th St Station & Ave Wall Garage Ave Wall Transit 23rd Center Route 455 !( Ogden Station!H & Transit Center !( 24th WSU/Davis Co/U of U T - RT 456, 470, 473, 603, 604, 613, 616, 630, 28th St 650, F618, FrontRunner 30th St T - RT 645 T - RT 470, 612 Snow Routing T - RT 625 Washington Monroe Harrison Blvd Ogden North Map Snow Route - Snow Route - No service on Edvalson or 36th Street east of Birch during snow routing Harrison Blvd 36th St Sky lin e P k w Birch Ave Birch H Edvalson St y a r r i s Pkwy Dixon o T - Rt 473, 603, 625, n 3850 S B 640, 645, 650 l v d Weber State US-89 3950 S University T - Rt 625 US-89 South Weber US-89 Exit 405 South Weber Dr Antelope Drive Park & Ride South Weber Park & Ride NB - 3rd light after US-89 Fruit Heights SB - 1st light after South Weber Dr South Weber 2700 E 2700 Antelope Dr SR-193 Hobbs Creek Dr !H NB !( SB US-89 Antelope Dr Cherry Ln Legend Layton SB - 3rd light after Fruit Heights US-89 Antelope Dr Park Park & Ride Route US-89 Selected Route Oak Hills Dr Snow Route !H 200 N Rail !( Country Way Transfer Mountain Rd T - Rt 473 Landmark Fruit Heights TRAX Station FrontRunner Station Snow - Stay on Hwy 89 M o u n Effective Date November 29, 2020 t a i n Snow - Stay on Hwy 89 R d 0 0.75 1.52 4 Miles Miles Mountain Road (Dashed) Select trips(Dashed) bypass M o FarmingtonSelect trips bypass u nt FarmingtonStation & Station & Route 455 ain Rd Station StationPark Park !H WSU/Davis Co/U of U Main St !( (SR-106) T - Rt 470 Snow Routing Main St (SR-106) St Main Farmington Station & South Map US-89
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Transit List
    DRAFT 2015-2040 Preferred Scenario 12/20/2013 Transit Project List WEBER COUNTY PROJECTS 1. Pleasant View – Brigham City Corridor -- Mode Undetermined Downtown Ogden - Box Elder County Line 2. Ogden - Pleasant View Corridor -- Commuter Rail Improvements Downtown Ogden - Pleasant View FrontRunner Station 3. Ogden - Weber State University Corridor -- Streetcar Ogden Intermodal Center - Ogden CBD - 30th St. - Harrision - WSU Transitway - McKay Dee Hospital 4. West Weber - WSU Corridor -- Enhanced Bus & Various BRT W. Haven - Roy FrontRunner Station - Ogden Airport - Riverdale - Newgate Mall - WSU Transitway - McKay Dee Hospital 5. Ogden Valley Park and Ride SR-39 near Pineview Dam DAVIS COUNTY PROJECTS 6. Falcon Hill - Hill AFB West Transit Center Falcon Hill - Hill AFB West Gate 7. Hill AFB South Transit Center Hill AFB South Gate 8. US-89 Park and Ride US-89 near Antelope Drive, Layton INTERCOUNTY PROJECTS 9. Harrisville - Salt Lake Corridor (North) -- Enhanced Bus & Various BRT Harrisville - Ogden Intermodal Ctr - Downtown Ogden - Newgate Mall - Riverdale - Ogden Airport - Falcon Hill Transitway - Hill South Gate - Clearfield FrontRunner Station - Layton Main Street - Layton FrontRunner Station - Kaysville - Fruit Heights - Farmington Station 10. Harrisville - Salt Lake Corridor (South) -- Enhanced Bus & Various BRT Farmington Station - Downtown Farmington - Centerville - Bountiful Main Street - Woods Cross - North Salt Lake - Salt Lake Central - 200 South Transit Center 11. West Weber - West Davis Corridor -- Enhanced Bus & Various BRT Ogden Intermodal Center - Ogden CBD - Newgate Mall - Riverdale - Ogden Airport - Roy FrontRunner Station - West Haven - Clinton - West Point - Syracuse - Clearfield FrontRunner Station - Hill AFB South Gate Transit Hub - Layton Hills - Layton FrontRunner Station 1 of 4 DRAFT 2015-2040 Preferred Scenario 12/20/2013 Transit Project List 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 455 - Weber State/Davis Co./Uofu Hwy 89 17Th St
    Route 455 - Weber State/Davis Co./UofU Hwy 89 17th St W Rt 470 Center St d Dr all A T char UDOT Fruit Heights Or v W 200 N Park & Ride Lot roundabout all A Ogden Station Mountain R Eagle Ridge Dr v T Rts. 601, 603, 604, 613, North 17th St northbound 630, 650,F618, F620, 470, Salt 26th St T Rts.604 473, FrontRunner d 1800S Lake Ogden 23rd St 28th St Ogden Harrison Station Ogden Station Rts.612 T 30th St Harrison Hwy 89 28th St W ashingt W 30th St Sk ashingt 2350 S yline Pk 24th St on Farmington M 36th St a W on Station in wy Ogden Transit all A Rts. 603, 625, WSU southbound T Center 640, 645, 650 Univ 600 N ark Ln Main v Edvalson P Beck St 3950 S WSU ersit Hwy 89 Dee Event Center 100 N y A State T Rt 470 Rts 3, 6, 200, 209, v 454, 455, 460, 462, e 1 Davis County 41 E 470, 471, 472, 473, Justice Complex 200 E 300 W Southbound Hwy 89 -Route Transfer point Enter Farmington T Station from Park Ln T N Temple Main Stat Salt Lake City W T e South Weber Dr exit Exit 405 emple South Weber Dr Park & Ride Lot d 400 S Hwy 89 Chase Ln (1000 N) 400 E rontage R Rt 470 T Highway 89 and Antelope Drive Park & Ride East F University of Utah Mario Capec Hwy 89 Hwy Stadium Station University of Utah Rts 2X, 3, 4, 9, 213, 220 Business Loop Northbound 473, red line eek Dr chi Dr Chipeta W Hwy 89 T S Campus Dr Hobbs Cr T y Antelope Dr a W y 500 S Rts 17, 213, 223, ar ak Highway 89 and 1300 E Red line Ar W apeen Antelope Drive Park & Ride VA Hospital Foothill Dr Komas Fruit T Heights Rts 3 Blackhawk , 473 For Information Call 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) Farmington Station outside Salt Lake County 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743-3882) Lagoon www.rideuta.com 455 Rts.
    [Show full text]
  • 750 Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    750 train time schedule & line map To North Temple View In Website Mode The 750 train line (To North Temple) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To North Temple: 7:16 AM - 7:16 PM (2) To Ogden: 4:53 AM - 9:53 PM (3) To Provo: 5:03 AM - 10:08 PM (4) To Salt Lake Central: 7:38 PM - 8:38 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 750 train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 750 train arriving. Direction: To North Temple 750 train Time Schedule 9 stops To North Temple Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:23 AM Monday 10:53 PM - 11:53 PM Provo Central Station 690 University Avenue, Provo Tuesday 12:23 AM - 7:16 PM Orem Central Station Wednesday 7:16 AM - 7:16 PM American Fork Station Thursday 7:16 AM - 7:16 PM 782 West 200 South, Utah County Friday 7:16 AM - 11:16 PM Lehi Station Saturday 12:16 AM - 11:53 PM 3101 North Ashton Boulevard, Lehi Draper Station 12997 South Frontrunner Boulevard, Draper 750 train Info South Jordan Station Direction: To North Temple 10351 South Jordan Gateway, South Jordan Stops: 9 Trip Duration: 70 min Murray Central Station Line Summary: Provo Central Station, Orem Central 127 West Vine Street, Murray Station, American Fork Station, Lehi Station, Draper Station, South Jordan Station, Murray Central Salt Lake Central Station Station, Salt Lake Central Station, North Temple 250 South 600 West, Salt Lake City Station North Temple Station Direction: To Ogden 750 train Time Schedule 16 stops To Ogden Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:56
    [Show full text]