Weber, Davis Box Elder & County System Map Legend
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market
THE GREATER SALT LAKE AREA MULTIFAMILY MARKET THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE MULTIFAMILY REPORT | 2019 REVIEW + 2020 OUTLOOK PREFACE TABLE OF CBRE is pleased to release the 2020 Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market Report, the most current and comprehensive CONTENTS multifamily data available for the Salt Lake Area/Wasatch Front market. Produced by Eli Mills and Patrick Bodnar of CBRE, this report has been assembled to empower the decision making of multifamily professionals active in the Utah market. This report has been prepared with current data sourced from a survey of over half the multifamily market (60,000+ units) along the Wasatch Front Area inclusive of Salt Lake, Utah, Davis and Weber Counties. Minimum reporting requirements were identified for each city and county by class, type and size. Data contributions and validations to this publication were made by: • CBRE Research • Utah Department of Economics • CBRE Econometric Advisors • University of Utah Bureau of Economics and Business Research • Yardi Matrix • Construction Monitor • Axiometrics • CoStar • Western States Multifamily Whatever your multifamily needs may be, please reach out to us. CBRE has the most comprehensive data on the market and can provide information on a macro or micro level based on class, city, submarket, zip code, location, age, size, proximity to rail stops, and many other variations. CBRE consistently leads the market, with national multifamily investment sales totaling over $33.3 billion in 2019 (Source: Real Capital Analytics). As the leader in multifamily sales every year since 2001, the exposure of CBRE is second-to-none. With 65 locations and over 300 multifamily professionals, including direct lending services, CBRE’s unparalleled multifamily platform has a competitive presence in Utah and an enhanced investment reach into the multifamily space, providing our clients with the greatest market exposure available. -
Clearfield City 3 Millcreek 5 North Ogden 8 North Salt Lake 11 Perry City 14 West Valley City 17 March 2021 Local Progress Case Studies
LOCAL PROGRESS CASE STUDIES MARCH 2021 CONTENTS LOCAL PROGRESS CASE STUDIES. 2 CLEARFIELD CITY 3 MILLCREEK 5 NORTH OGDEN 8 NORTH SALT LAKE 11 PERRY CITY 14 WEST VALLEY CITY 17 MARCH 2021 LOCAL PROGRESS CASE STUDIES. The case studies in this document highlight a cross section of communities in their efforts to address the challenges of a growing Utah. As you will see, these stories demonstrate the time and complexity it takes to work with the broader community to change planning and zoning. Change takes some time and yet progress is being made. The case studies should be useful to communities to get ideas about how to address growth. • How are communities working with their residents? • What are the technical approaches used? • Ultimately, what are some of the key lessons learned? This information should serve as a springboard to further dive into the plans and policies that are emerging across the greater Wasatch Front. The Growth Challenge: For the past decade, Utah has been the fastest growing state in the nation. This creates challenges for housing, transportation, air quality, etc.. The local process to address these issues starts with a community’s general plan. The general plan is the opportunity to coordinate a variety of physical changes to a community. You will see general plan updates highlighted in most of these progress stories. Wasatch Choice Regional Vision: As communities update their plans, they are exploring implementation of the Wasatch Choice Regional Vision, which focuses on coordinating the planning and location of land use, housing, transportation, economic development, and open space to achieve a higher quality of life. -
Meadow View Phase 2, Farmington, Utah
Meadow View Phase 2, Farmington, Utah Built for the Way You Want to Live! www.MeadowViewUtah.com Great Farmington Location Meadow View Phase 2 is conveniently located in Farmington within 1 mile of the new Station Park shopping district and the Farmington UTA Frontrunner station. Leave your car at home and enjoy a comfortable trip into downtown Salt Lake City for work or play. Enjoy the open air living of Meadow View with panoramic views on large basement lots with the amenities of Station Park—shopping, restaurants, parks and schools all less than two miles away. For more information, or a personal tour contact: Sarah Mayer 801.218.2885 [email protected] Model Home coming soon! Get news and updates Watch video tours on Facebook on YouTube Information is subject to change without notice. © ClearWater Homes. All rights reserved. Front Porch Lighting Front Porch Get More For Your Dollar Panoramic 2-Tone Paint Window Walls Expansive Low-E Energy Efficient Windows 6 Inch Wooden Base Boards Window Sills Pendant Lighting * Energy Efficient Lighting 6 Inch Trim Shaker Panel Beech Cabinets 8 Foot Doors On Main Floor 42” Upper Cabinets Moen Fixtures With Crown Molding Transom Window * Stainless Steel Sink Kwikset Satin Nickel Hardware Luxury Laminate Wood Floors 3cm Granite Countertops Stainless Steel Appliances Trash Pull Out “*” Optional Upgrade Items 42” Shower with Cultured Marble Surround Oversized Kohler Soaker Bathtub Generous 5-Piece Master Baths 3cm Granite Counters Moen Fixtures Tile Floors Shaker Panel Beech Cabinets Built to Conserve Energy An energy efficient home is a more comfortable home. Insulation is a critical component to an energy efficient home and Clearwater Homes implements several techniques into our building process to ensure maximum insulation. -
Utah's 2011-2040 Unified Transportation Plan
2011 - 2040 udot.utah.gov 131949.indd 1 7/31/13 2:23 PM UTah’S UNifieD PLaN ParTNerS CaChe MPO 179 North Main, Suite 305 Logan, UT 84321 (435) 716-7154 www.cachempo.org Dixie MPO 1070 West 1600 South, Bldg. B St. George, UT 84770 (435) 673-3548 www.dixiempo.org MOUNTaiNLaND aSSOCiaTiON Of GOverNMeNTS 586 east 800 North Orem, UT 84097 (801) 229-3800 www.mountainland.org UTah DeParTMeNT Of TraNSPOrTaTiON Systems Planning and Programming 4501 South 2700 West – Box 143600 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 (801) 965-4129 www.udot.utah.gov UTah TraNSiT aUThOriTy 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 262-5626 www.rideuta.com WaSaTCh frONT reGiONaL COUNCiL 295 North Jimmy Doolittle road Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (801) 363-4250 www.wfrc.org 131949.indd 2 7/31/13 2:23 PM TaBLe Of CONTeNTS introduction 2 - Letter from the Chairs of the Utah Transportation Commission and Utah’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) - Letter from the Directors of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and Utah’s MPOs - Purpose of Unified Transportation Planning UDOT’s Long range Plan 8 Utah MPO Long range Plans 12 - Wasatch Choices 2040 (Weber, Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties) - envision Cache valley (Cache County) - vision Dixie (Washington County) Utah’s Population Growth Challenge 16 Utah’s Project Planning & funding Process 20 - Project Development Process - Utah’s Transportation Needs and Preferences - financial Plan and assumptions - Continuous, Cooperative and Comprehensive Planning highway Projects by region 34 regionally important Transportation Projects 34 Utah highway Projects Map 35 highway Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 36- 41 highway Projects Phase Two (2021-2030) 42-46 highway Projects Phase Three (2031-2040) 47-50 highway Projects Unfunded 51 -52 Cache valley highway Projects Map 53 Wasatch front Ogden/Layton area highway Projects Map 54 Wasatch front Salt Lake valley highway Projects Map 55 Utah valley area highway Projects Map 56 Dixie area highway Projects Map 57 Transit Projects by region 58 Transit Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 59. -
Utah Solar Home Tours Begin This Weekend in Davis County Memorial Day Events Bulk Purchase Makes Solar
L OCAL N EWS • P EOPLE • B USINESS • S CHOOLS • S PORTS • E VENTS See Inside DavisThe Clipper 75 cents THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2015 ADVERTISMENT Utah Solar Home Tours begin this weekend in Davis County Memorial Day events Bulk purchase makes solar BECKY GINOS LOUISE R. SHAW, A1 affordable for homeowners Last year, over 24 million solar panels were installed in the United States. Still, many Race unites homeowners are still wondering if solar really works, if it makes families fi nancial sense, and how those who’ve put solar panels to work Annual 5K offers in their homes and businesses support for grieving feel about it. Now, Davis County residents families, friends. can fi nd out from their neigh- LOUISE R. SHAW, C1 bors and peers. The Utah Solar Home Tour, featuring locations about Davis, Weber and Cache Counties, runs this Friday and “We can match any home and Saturday. Friday hours are 4 to 8 any budget to make solar work for Tour of p.m., with Saturday tour hours 10 everyone,” Shipley said. a.m. to 4 p.m. The tour is hosted There is a deadline, as bulk by the Intermountain Community purchasing ends on June 30. Utah coming Shipley said solar is an investment The federal incentives for solar is hosting a solar workshop to Solar Initiative. power conversion are currently 30 provide answers to basic ques- “This is a great opportunity for “better than any stock or mutual Cycling event stage fund you could put your money percent, and there are state incen- tions and educate attendees about people to go and see real homes tives as well. -
Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Local Advisory Council REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
669 West 200 South Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Local Advisory Council REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, June 2, 2021 1:00 PM Frontlines Headquarters NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC: In accordance with the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, (Utah Code § 52-4-207.4), the UTA Local Advisory Council will make the following adjustments to our normal meeting procedures. • All members of the Local Advisory Council and meeting presenters will participate electronically. • Meeting proceedings may be viewed remotely through the WebEx meeting platform (see below) or by following the instructions and link on the UTA Board Meetings page - https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees/Meetings • Public Comment may be given live during the meeting. See instructions below. o Use this WebEx link and follow the instructions to register for the meeting (you will need to provide your name and email address) https://rideuta.webex.com/rideuta/onstage/g.php?MTID=ed2f6fab6a382e44c85991cd71728f914 o Sign on to the WebEx meeting portal through the “join event” link provided in your email following approval of your registration. o Sign on 5 minutes prior to the meeting start time o Comments are limited to 3 minutes per commenter. • Public Comment may also be given through alternate means. See instructions below. o Comment via email at [email protected] o Comment by telephone at 801-743-3882 option 5 (801-RideUTA option 5) – specify that your comment is for the Local Advisory Council meeting. o Comments submitted before 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 1st will be distributed to council members prior to the meeting. -
Comments from Draft 2015-2040 Scenario – Summer 2013
6/11/2014 Comments from Draft 2015-2040 Scenario – Summer 2013 Comment WFRC Process Category Key: Key - (1)Highway Comment Comment Meeting Name of Commenter Comment Comment Date (2)Transit Was: WFRC Response Number Location (3)Bike (7)Accepted (4)Land Use (8)Not (5)Other Accepted Weber UDOT Region I Planning How do we rectify existing and currently WFRC takes the existing zoning and tries to fit it into the various 1 County Office planned zoning with what we think it will be 5/3/2013 4 7 scenarios. Open House Weber UDOT West Davis Is there any measure of delay for transit WFRC looks for what people can access within 20 minutes using 2 County Highway EIS Team users? How much time is spent waiting on 5/3/2013 2 7 transit. Open House connections? Weber Davis County Planning What are the average minutes of delay per The minutes of delay per person are about the same in each ‘Vision’ 3 County person in the scenarios? That would be a 5/3/2013 5 7 scenario and less so in the current trend scenario. Open House better measure of performance. Weber UTA Planning Office Why did the most dense land use in Scenario Seventy percent of the land use is already set with existing 4 County T only save 4 million miles per day of VMT 5/3/2013 4 7 development. Open House compared to baseline? Weber UDOT West Davis What is the shift in mode share between The mode split for transit rises from 4% to 6%. -
Comparative Case Studies of Orenco Station TOD and Station Park
Final report Comparative Case Studies: Trip and Parking Generation at Orenco Station TOD, Portland Region and Station Park TAD, Salt Lake City Region Reid Ewing, Guang Tian, and Keunhyun Park College of Architecture + Planning, University of Utah Preston Stinger Fehr & Peers Associates John Southgate John Southgate LLC Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge financial support for this study from the Utah Department of Transportation and logistical support from the main developers of Orenco Station and Station Park, the Holland Property Group and CenterCal Properties. We also wish to acknowledge review comments and approval of this report by the Metropolitan Research Center’s Technical Advisory Committee: Diego Carroll – WSP Jeff Harris – Utah Department of Transportation Ted Knowlton – Wasatch Front Regional Council G.J. LaBonty – Utah Transit Authority Sarah Munro – University Neighborhood Partners Andrea Olson – Parametrix Christine Richman – GSBS Consultants Jack Robinson – Sorenson Impact Center Preston Stinger – Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultant Wilf Sommerkorn – Salt Lake County 2 Chapter 1. Introduction This report presents comparative case studies, defined as “the analysis and synthesis of the similarities, differences and patterns across two or more cases that share a common focus or goal in a way that produces knowledge that is easier to generalize about causal questions” (Goodrick, 2014: 1). This follows earlier case studies by the authors at five exemplary transit-oriented developments (TODs) across the U.S.: Redmond TOD in Seattle; Rhode Island Row in Washington D.C.; Fruitvale Village in San Francisco-Oakland; Englewood TOD in Denver; and Wilshire/Vermont in Los Angeles (Ewing et al. 2016). The subject of this sixth case study is Orenco Station, on the west side of the Portland metropolitan area in the suburban city of Hillsboro, OR. -
MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CLEARFIELD STATION THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“MDA”) Is Made and Entered Into As Of
09.29.2020 10.23.2020 10.29.2020 MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CLEARFIELD STATION THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“MDA”) is made and entered into as of the ____ day of ______________, 2020 (“Effective Date”), by and between Clearfield City, a Utah municipal corporation (“City”), and Clearfield Station Partners, LLC a Utah limited liability company (“Master Developer”), and Utah Transit Authority, a large public transit district of the State of Utah (“UTA”). This MDA concerns a long term, mixed use, master planned transit- oriented development (“TOD”) known as Clearfield Station (“Project”). RECITALS WHEREAS, UTA is the owner of that certain real property located generally between State Street and the Frontrunner commuter rail corridor, and approximately between 1100 South and 1450 South, in Clearfield, Davis County, Utah, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” (“Property”), and as generally depicted in the Master Development Plan (“MDP”), attached hereto as Exhibit “B”; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to develop, design and construct Property in accordance with this MDA in a manner that is in harmony with the long-range policies, goals, and objectives of the City’s general plan, the Clearfield Connected Station Area Plan, and the MDP, as well as any applicable zoning and development regulations; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to grant Master Developer vested rights in and to the development and use of Property as more fully set forth in this MDA in order to promote the City’s goals and objectives and to ensure that Property -
October 4, 2016 CONFIDENTIAL Submitted Pursuant to Rule 408 Federal Rules of Evidence Mr. Mark Y. Hirata Assistant Attorney Gene
I l I I I ill I lour ),111 I Cite. I ,tdr.,1 I I Ilan? NH/ 1900(1 \\ 21' coil] October 4, 2016 k Cal 1q0,1 Scinnicl CONFIDENTIAL Dial/ II" Submitted pursuant to Rule 408 S114111'111, 1)1,1,1,1' 1&,,incy I'm 4,7 Federal Rules of Evidence Kichar I. 111(1101 ;II 111,,I,2 1),1111CI 11 11111 Mr. Mark Y. Hirata Mr. Stewart Young ( rum111,.. A. .Inhnsan Assistant Attorney General Assistant Attorney General 111170h:1111 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Sc'011 A 01 185 South State Street, Suite 300 185 South State Street, Suite 300 ncr L. Iit,t)11C1 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 ,I111 1)1111.101? flali,1 I Mr. Stewart C. Walz /'thin 11ill,,1- Senior Litigation Counsel .111,1111] 1,) . 1 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 1 ,1,,,I,J11 1 85 South State Street, Suite 300 S ho bc II" Thmnp,m1 Gentlemen: 11 .11\711111 . 11 1:111 /1‘11 A Cillh1111 I. 16'1, In August 2014, the State of Utah's Office of Legislative Auditor released its audit Ri11,11C1' IIIR.1110P1 ("Legislative Audit") of the Utah Transit Authority ("UTA" or the "Authority"). The Audit identified several areas where the lack of adequate institutional controls .1 and oversight led to problematic actions taken by the Authority. I' ( I WI )1111g In the past several years, UTA has taken many steps to address its previous ,V,111hIll .1 I 1;HW organizational weaknesses. -
Route 455 Snow Routing
Ogden Ogden 17th St Station & Ave Wall Garage Ave Wall Transit 23rd Center Route 455 !( Ogden Station!H & Transit Center !( 24th WSU/Davis Co/U of U T - RT 456, 470, 473, 603, 604, 613, 616, 630, 28th St 650, F618, FrontRunner 30th St T - RT 645 T - RT 470, 612 Snow Routing T - RT 625 Washington Monroe Harrison Blvd Ogden North Map Snow Route - Snow Route - No service on Edvalson or 36th Street east of Birch during snow routing Harrison Blvd 36th St Sky lin e P k w Birch Ave Birch H Edvalson St y a r r i s Pkwy Dixon o T - Rt 473, 603, 625, n 3850 S B 640, 645, 650 l v d Weber State US-89 3950 S University T - Rt 625 US-89 South Weber US-89 Exit 405 South Weber Dr Antelope Drive Park & Ride South Weber Park & Ride NB - 3rd light after US-89 Fruit Heights SB - 1st light after South Weber Dr South Weber 2700 E 2700 Antelope Dr SR-193 Hobbs Creek Dr !H NB !( SB US-89 Antelope Dr Cherry Ln Legend Layton SB - 3rd light after Fruit Heights US-89 Antelope Dr Park Park & Ride Route US-89 Selected Route Oak Hills Dr Snow Route !H 200 N Rail !( Country Way Transfer Mountain Rd T - Rt 473 Landmark Fruit Heights TRAX Station FrontRunner Station Snow - Stay on Hwy 89 M o u n Effective Date November 29, 2020 t a i n Snow - Stay on Hwy 89 R d 0 0.75 1.52 4 Miles Miles Mountain Road (Dashed) Select trips(Dashed) bypass M o FarmingtonSelect trips bypass u nt FarmingtonStation & Station & Route 455 ain Rd Station StationPark Park !H WSU/Davis Co/U of U Main St !( (SR-106) T - Rt 470 Snow Routing Main St (SR-106) St Main Farmington Station & South Map US-89 -
Preliminary Existing Conditions (Draft)
Kaysville General Plan Update PRELIMINARY EXISTING CONDITIONS (DRAFT) 20 July 2020 Kaysville General Plan Update Preliminary Land Use, Housing and Demographic Conditions/Projections MAP X.X - EXISTING LAND USE Single Family Residential Multifamily Residential Manufactured Homes Industrial/Business Park Mutton Hollow Road Commercial Civic/Institutional Education Religious Utilities Agriculture Parks Open Space Cemetery Crestwood Road Open/Vacant/Agricultural Land City Boundary U.S. 89 U.S. 200 North Lakes/Ponds Flint Street Flint Streams/Canals Wetlands Main Street Main Trails Railroads 50 West 50 Main Street Sunset Drive Sunset Burton Lane Western Drive Shepard Lane 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles ± Preliminary Demographic Conditions and Projections Population Projections: Four sources provide population projections for 2050 in Kaysville. The population difference between the high and low projections is 4,081. Determining which population projection to use will assist in determining how many housing units are needed and their mix. The June 2019 financial report indices a build-out population would be reached in the next 20 years and would be about 42,000. 2050 Population Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Households 1. TAZ DATA (WFRC) 32,238 33,800 36,263 39,133 13,287 2. Governor’s Office of Management & Budget 27,300 32,500 35,465 37,261 40,623 10,649 3. Water System IFFP (LYRB) 27,708 32,103 35,416 39,121 43,214 11,328 4. Kaysville City Financial Report, June 2019 42,000 42,000 11,010 AVERAGE 27,504 32,280 34,894 38,661 41,242 10,812 • Following discussions with city staff, a future population size of 42,000 was determined for use in projections.