DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION House of Representatives E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 143 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1997 No. 4 The House met at 12 noon and was Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- The Chair has often reiterated that called to order by the Speaker pro tem- nal stands approved. Members should refrain from ref- pore [Mr. BEREUTER]. f erences in debate to the conduct of f other Members where such conduct is PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE not the question actually pending be- DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER fore the House, either by way of a re- PRO TEMPORE The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. TRAFICANT] port from the Committee on Standards The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- come forward and lead the House in the of Official Conduct or by way of an- fore the House the following commu- Pledge of Allegiance. other question of the privileges of the nication from the Speaker: Mr. TRAFICANT led the Pledge of House. January 21, 1997. Allegiance as follows: I hereby designate the Honorable DOUG BE- This principle is documented on I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the REUTER to act as Speaker pro tempore on pages 168 and 526 of the House Rules this day. United States of America, and to the Repub- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, and Manual and reflects the consistent NEWT GINGRICH, rulings of the Chair in this and in prior Speaker of the House of Representatives. indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Congresses. It derives its force pri- f f marily from clause 1 of rule XIV which PRAYER MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT broadly prohibits engaging in personal- The Chaplain, Rev. James David Sundry messages in writing from the ity in debate. It has been part of the Ford, D.D., offered the following pray- President of the United States were rules of the House since 1789. er: communicated to the House by Mr. On the other hand, the calling up of We join in the words of the Psalmist Sherman Williams, one of his secretar- a resolution reported by the Commit- who wrote: ``Behold how good and ies. tee on Standards of Official Conduct, or pleasant it is when God's people dwell f the offering of a resolution as a similar in unity. It is like the precious oil upon question of the privileges of the House, the head, running down upon the beard, IN THE MATTER OF embarks the House on consideration of upon the beard of Aaron, running down REPRESENTATIVE NEWT GINGRICH a proposition that admits references in on the collar of his robes. It is like the Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut. Mr. debate to a Member's conduct. Discipli- dew of Hermon, which falls on the Speaker, pursuant to rule IX and by di- nary matters by their very nature in- mountains of Zion. For there the Lord rection of the Select Committee on volve personalities. has commanded the blessing, life for- Ethics, I send to the desk a privileged Still, this exception to the general evermore.'' resolution (H. Res. 31) in the matter of Among all Your bountiful favors to rule against engaging in personalityÐ Representative NEWT GINGRICH, and us, O gracious God, is the knowledge admitting references to a Member's ask for its immediate consideration. that You have created every person in conduct when that conduct is the very The Clerk read the resolution, as fol- Your image and You have blessed every lows: question under consideration by the person with those gifts that make us HouseÐis closely limited. This point HOUSE RESOLUTION 31 truly human: the gifts of justice and was well stated on July 31, 1979, as fol- mercy, the gifts of peace and good will, IN THE MATTER OF REPRESENTATIVE NEWT lows: While a wide range of discussion GINGRICH the gifts of unity and common purpose. is permitted during debate on a dis- Resolved, That the House adopt the report May all Your blessings, O God, that ciplinary resolution, clause 1 of rule of the Select Committee on Ethics dated flow from the early morn to the last XIV still prohibits the use of language light, be with each of us and remain January 17, 1997, In the Matter of Represent- ative Newt Gingrich. which is personally abusive. This is re- with us all our days. corded in the Deschler-Brown Proce- In Your name we pray. Amen. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The res- dure in the House of Representatives in f olution constitutes a question of privi- lege and may be called up at any time. chapter 12, at section 2.11. THE JOURNAL ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE On the question now pending before The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The SPEAKER pro tempore. Before the House, the resolution offered by Chair has examined the Journal of the we proceed, the Chair will have a state- the gentlewoman from Connecticut, last day's proceedings and announces ment about the decorum expected of Members should confine their remarks to the House his approval thereof. the Members. in debate to the merits of that precise b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H171 H172 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE January 21, 1997 question. Members should refrain from Each Member of Congress, especially b 1215 remarks that constitute personalities those in positions of leadership, shoul- Despite the pressures, we bring you with respect to members of the Com- ders the responsibility of avoiding even today a bipartisan recommendation re- mittee on Standards of Official Con- the appearance of impropriety. Rep- solving the most complex charge duct or the Select Committee on Eth- resentative GINGRICH failed to exercise against Representative NEWT GINGRICH. ics or with respect to other sitting the discipline and caution of his office I ask for both my colleagues' rejection Members whose conduct is not the sub- and so is subject to penalty today. ject of the pending report. Finally, As I have said, the penalty rec- of the partisanship and animosity that Members should exercise care to main- ommended by the committee is tough has so deeply permeated the work of tain an atmosphere of mutual respect. and unprecedented. In past cases of the House and for their support of the On January 27, 1909, the House adopt- this nature, the House has reprimanded committee's resolution. ed a report that stated the following: It a Member only where the Member was Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of is the duty of the House to require its found to have intentionally made false my time. Members in speech or debate to pre- statements to the Ethics Committee. Mr. CARDIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield serve that proper restraint which will In this case, the committee rec- myself such time as I may consume. permit the House to conduct its busi- ommended a reprimand of Representa- ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE ness in an orderly manner and without tive GINGRICH even though the state- unnecessarily and unduly exciting ani- ment of alleged violations did not as- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gen- mosity among its Members. sert that he intentionally misled the tleman will suspend. This is recorded in Cannon's Prece- committee. Likewise in past cases The Chair notes a disturbance in the dents in volume 8 at section 2497. where the committee imposed mone- visitors' gallery in contravention of The report adopted on that occasion tary sanctions on a Member, the com- the laws and the rules of the House. responded to improper references in de- mittee found that the Member had The Doorkeepers and police, the Chair bate to the President, but it articu- been personally enriched by the mis- believes, have already acted, but shall lated a principle that occupants of the conduct. The committee made no such act to remove from the gallery those Chair over many Congresses have held finding against Representative GING- persons participating in a disturbance. equally applicable to Members' re- RICH, yet recommends that a cost reim- If there is an outburst from the visi- marks toward each other. bursement of $300,000 be paid to the tors' gallery, the Chair will make this The Chair asks and expects the co- House by him. statement but will insist on order. operation of all Members in maintain- The report before us contains several ing a level of decorum that properly The Chair recognizes the gentleman hundred pages of exhibits and a de- dignifies the proceedings of the House. from Maryland [Mr. CARDIN]. The gentlewoman from Connecticut tailed analysis of the subcommittee's Mr. CARDIN. Mr. Speaker, as I have findings. The allegations and the key [Mrs. JOHNSON] is recognized for 1 hour. said, this is a sad moment for the Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut. Mr. facts supporting them were laid out by House of Representatives. One of our Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the special counsel during a public Members has admitted to a serious vio- debate on the resolution be extended hearing on January 17. The commit- lation of the House rules. This process for a half an hour. tee's recommendations before you and this admission affects not only The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there today end 2 long years of work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
    Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House).
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Guide 2021-2022
    Faculty Administration JUDITH KELLEY: Dean, Sanford School of Public Policy; ITT/Terry Sanford Professor of Public Policy; Professor of Political Science, Bass Fellow PhD (Public Policy), Harvard University, 2001 Pronouns: She/her/hers Faculty Guide 2021-2022 Research: International relations and institutions; international law and norms; international election mon- itoring; democracy promotion; human rights; human This academic year, the Sanford School of trafficking; the role of external actors in domestic political reforms Public Policy celebrates 50 years since the CORINNE M. KRUPP: Associate Dean for Academic founding of the public policy program Programs; Professor of the Practice of Public Policy at Duke University in 1971. The Sanford PhD (Economics), University of Pennsylvania, 1990 Pronouns: She/her/hers School faculty have earned national and inter- Research: International trade policy; antidumping law national recognition for excellence in research, and firm behavior; competition policy; European Union policy engagement and teaching. The school has a diverse mix trade and finance issues; economic development of academic scholars and professors of the practice whose prac- PHILIP M. NAPOLI: Senior Associate Dean for tical experience in top leadership roles enhances the classroom Faculty and Research; James R. Shepley Professor of experience. Faculty members collaborate across disciplines to Public Policy; Director, DeWitt Wallace Center for explore questions relating to income inequality, obesity and Media & Democracy PhD (Mass
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three Southern Business and Public Accommodations: an Economic-Historical Paradox
    Chapter Three Southern Business and Public Accommodations: An Economic-Historical Paradox 2 With the aid of hindsight, the landmark Civil Rights legislation of 1964 and 1965, which shattered the system of racial segregation dating back to the nineteenth century in the southern states, is clearly identifiable as a positive stimulus to regional economic development. Although the South’s convergence toward national per capita income levels began earlier, any number of economic indicators – personal income, business investment, retail sales – show a positive acceleration from the mid 1960s onward, after a hiatus during the previous decade. Surveying the record, journalist Peter Applebome marveled at “the utterly unexpected way the Civil Rights revolution turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to the white South, paving the way for the region’s newfound prosperity.”1 But this observation poses a paradox for business and economic history. Normally we presume that business groups take political positions in order to promote their own economic interests, albeit at times shortsightedly. But here we have a case in which regional businesses and businessmen, with few exceptions, supported segregation and opposed state and national efforts at racial integration, a policy that subsequently emerged as “the best thing that ever happened to the white South.” In effect southern business had to be coerced by the federal government to act in its own economic self interest! Such a paradox in business behavior surely calls for explanation, yet the case has yet to be analyzed explicitly by business and economic historians. This chapter concentrates on public accommodations, a surprisingly neglected topic in Civil Rights history.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Handout As an Adobe Acrobat
    AEI Election Watch 2006 October 11, 2006 Bush’s Ratings Congress’s Ratings Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 39 56 CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 28 63 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 37 59 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 24 68 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 39 60 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 32 66 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 34 60 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 27 64 Newsweek Oct. 5-6 33 59 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 31 57 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 36 57 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 27 69 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 38 59 Diag.-Hotline Sep. 24-26 28 65 PSRA/Pew Sep. 21-Oct. 4 37 53 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 30 57 NBC/WSJ Sep. 30-Oct. 2 39 56 Fox/OD Sep. 12-13 29 53 Fox/OD Sep. 26-27 42 54 NBC/WSJ (RV) Sep. 8-11 20 65 Diag-Hotline Sep. 24-26 42 56 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 45 52 Final October approval rating for the president and Final October approval rating for Congress and number of House seats won/lost by the president’s number of House seats won/lost by the president’s party party Gallup/CNN/USA Today Gallup/CNN/USA Today Number Number Approve of seats Approve of seats Oct. 2002 67 +8 Oct. 2002 50 +8 Oct. 1998 65 +5 Oct. 1998 44 +5 Oct. 1994 48 -52 Oct. 1994 23 -52 Oct. 1990 48 -9 Oct. 1990 24 -9 Oct. 1986 62 -5 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadiums of Status: Civic Development, Race, and the Business of Sports in Atlanta, Georgia, 1966-2019
    i Stadiums of Status: Civic Development, Race, and the Business of Sports in Atlanta, Georgia, 1966-2019 By Joseph Loughran Senior Honors Thesis History University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill May 1, 2020 Approved: ___________________________________ Dr. Matthew Andrews, Thesis Advisor Dr. William Sturkey, Reader i Acknowledgements I could not have completed this thesis without the overwhelming support from my mother and father. Ever since I broached the idea of writing a thesis in spring 2019, they not only supported me, but guided me through the tough times in order to create this project. From bouncing ideas off you to using your encouragement to keep pushing forward, I cannot thank the both of you enough. I would also like to thank my advisor, Dr. Matthew Andrews, for his constant support, guidance, and advice over the last year. Rather than simply giving feedback or instructions on different parts of my thesis, our meetings would turn into conversations, feeding off a mutual love for learning about how sports impact history. While Dr. Andrews was an advisor for this past year, he will be a friend for life. Thank you to Dr. Michelle King as well, as her guidance throughout the year as the teacher for our thesis class was invaluable. Thank you for putting up with our nonsense and shepherding us throughout this process, Dr. King. This project was supported by the Tom and Elizabeth Long Excellence Fund for Honors administered by Honors Carolina, as well as The Michel L. and Matthew L. Boyatt Award for Research in History administered by the Department of History at UNC-Chapel Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Advisory Boards, Commissions, and Groups
    CONGRESSIONAL ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND GROUPS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY BOARD OF VISITORS [Title 10, U.S.C., Section 9355(a)] Board Member Year Appointed Appointed by the President: Susan C. Schwab, (Chair) 2009 Robin Hayes 2009 Marcelite Harris 2010 Arlen Jameson 2010 Sue C. Ross 2008 Appointed by the Vice President or the Senate President Pro Tempore: Senator Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina 2011 Senator John Hoeven, of North Dakota 2011 Senator Ben Nelson, of Nebraska 2007 Appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives: Representative Jared Polis, of Colorado 2009 Representative Doug Lamborn, of Colorado 2007 Representative Loretta Sanchez, of California 2007 Alfredo Sandoval 2010 Appointed by the Chairman, Senate Armed Services Committee: Senator Michael F. Bennet, of Colorado 2011 Appointed by the Chairman, House Armed Services Committee: Representative Niki Tsongas, of Massachusetts 2008 UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY BOARD OF VISITORS [Title 10, U.S.C., Section 4355(a)] Jack Reed, of Rhode Island. Maurice D. Hinchey, of New York. Mary L. Landrieu, of Louisiana. Jerry Lewis, of California. Kay Bailey Hutchison, of Texas. John Shimkus, of Illinois. Richard Burr, of North Carolina. UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY BOARD OF VISITORS [Title 10, U.S.C., Section 6968(a)] Appointed by the President: Hon. Nancy Johnson, (Vice Chair) Senior Public Policy Advisor, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC. Albert Hawkins III, Former Executive Commissioner, Texas HHS Commission. ADM John Nathman, USN (Ret.) Former Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces. Lt. Gen. Frank Petersen, USMC (Ret.) Chairman Emeritus, National Marrow Donor Program. RADM Michelle Howard, USN, Chief of Staff, J–5, Joint Staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Conflict Are U.S
    Published by CQ Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc. www.cqresearcher.com Racial Conflict Are U.S. policies discriminatory? ac e-centered conflicts in several U.S. cities have led to the strongest calls for policy reforms since the turbulent civil rights era of the 1960s. Propelled R largely by videos of violent police confrontations with African-Americans, protesters have taken to the streets in Chicago, New York and other cities demanding changes in police tactics. meanwhile, students — black and white — at several major universities have pressured school presidents to deal aggressively Demonstrators on Christmas Eve protest an alleged with racist incidents on campus. And activists in the emerging cover-up of a video showing a white Chicago police officer shooting 17-year-old African-American Laquan Black Lives matter movement are charging that “institutional racism” McDonald 16 times. The shooting — and others in which white police officers killed black suspects, often unarmed — has added fuel to a persists in public institutions and laws a half century after legally nationwide debate about systemic racism. sanctioned discrimination was banned. Critics of that view argue that moral failings in the black community — and not institutional racism — e xplain why many African-Americans lack parity with whites in such areas as wealth, employment, housing and educa - I tional attainment. B ut those who cite institutional racism say enor - THIS REPORT N THE ISSUES ......................27 mous socioeconomic gaps and entrenched housing and school S BACKGROUND ..................33 segregation patterns stem from societal decisions that far outweigh I CHRONOLOGY ..................35 individuals’ life choices. D CURRENT SITUATION ..........40 E CQ Researcher • Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 State Register and Manual Dedication
    Connecticut Congresswomen: A Legacy of Leadership and Public Service Six women have shared the distinction of representing the people of Connecticut in the United States Congress. These outstanding women—Clare Boothe Luce, Chase Going Woodhouse, Ella Tambussi Grasso, Barbara Bailey Kennelly, Nancy Lee Johnson, and Rosa L. DeLauro—not only served in the United States House of Representatives but also distinguished themselves as mothers and successful career women. Three of them—Woodhouse, Grasso, and Kennelly—gained political experience by holding the constitutional office of the Secretary of the State of Connecticut. Through their dedication to public service and the struggle for equal rights for all they have left an indelible mark in the history of our state and our country. Clare Boothe Luce—Clare Boothe Luce was Connecticut’s first woman in Congress and one of the Republican Party’s leading spokespersons during World War II and the immediate post-war years. Born in New York City on April 10, 1903, Boothe Luce was a successful magazine writer, managing editor and playwright before entering politics in 1942. In Congress, where she served from 1943 until 1947, she stood against isolationism by calling for a strong, post-war international organization. She would later support American participation in and oversight of the United Nations Refugee Relief Agency’s post-war programs. On the domestic front, she endorsed the development of the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps, called for heavy taxation of the rich to finance the war, supported the Equal Rights Amendment in 1943, and championed the creation of a bureau in the Labor Department to ensure equal pay for equal work for women and minority workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization
    REPORT ON THE APPELLATE BODY OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Office of the United States Trade Representative Ambassador Robert E. Lighthizer February 2020 INTRODUCTION For more than 20 years, the United States has expressed concerns that the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization – and in particular its Appellate Body – has not functioned according to the rules agreed by the United States and other WTO Members. This Report details those concerns and assesses the repeated failure of the Appellate Body to apply the rules of the WTO agreements in a manner that adheres to the text of those agreements. Specifically, the Appellate Body has added to U.S. obligations and diminished U.S. rights by failing to comply with WTO rules, addressing issues it has no authority to address, taking actions it has no authority to take, and interpreting WTO agreements in ways not envisioned by the WTO Members who entered into those agreements. This persistent overreaching is plainly contrary to the Appellate Body’s limited mandate, as set out in WTO rules. On a more fundamental level, this overreaching also violates the basic principles of the United States Government. There is no legitimacy under our democratic, constitutional system for the nation to submit to a rule imposed by three individuals sitting in Geneva, with neither agreement by the United States nor approval by the United States Congress. The Appellate Body has consistently acted to increase its own authority while decreasing the authority of the United States and other WTO Members, which, unlike the individuals on the Appellate Body, are accountable to the citizens in their countries – citizens whose lives and livelihoods are affected by the WTO’s decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hernandez Tcu 0229M 10692.Pdf
    ¡JUSTICIA FOR SANTOS!: MEXICAN AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS AND THE SANTOS RODRÍGUEZ AFFAIR IN DALLAS, TEXAS, 1969-1978 By OSMÍN RODRÍGO HERNÁNDEZ Bachelor of Arts, 2012 University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of AddRan College of Liberal Arts Texas Christian University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Masters of Arts May 2016 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis represents the highest academic achievement accomplished in my family. I want to first dedicate this work to mis padres and the rest of mi familia. Without your continual encouragement to further my education and challenge myself academically, I would not have arrived to this stage of my scholarly journey. This project would not have been possible without the accordance, guidance and patience of my advisor Dr. Max Krochmal. I am indebted to Dr. Krochmal; thank you for your insights, recommendations, and resources in helping me formulate in what began as a curious research seminar paper into a Master’s thesis. To my committee, Dr. Rebecca Sharpless and Dr. Gregg Cantrell, I am grateful to you both for being an essential part of my academic voyage and providing me with critical feedback and support with this project. To Dr. Todd Kerstetter, Dr. Peter Worthing, and the rest of the history department faculty and staff, thank you for your support in completing the program. I am grateful for the help of the staff and skilled librarians at the libraries I visited, particularly the Dallas Public Library’s Archives Division who helped me find alternative routes and materials with my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Elections: a Political Turning Point? Social Education Staff
    Social Education 70(6), pp. 382–386 ©2006 National Council for the Social Studies Congressional Elections: A Political Turning Point? Social Education Staff The Democrats have their best chance in 10 years to when national issues are on everybody’s mind. During the summer, make major gains in the congressional elections on November the approval rating of President Bush ranged between 33% and 7, while Republicans are striving to retain control of both the 42% in the different opinion polls. One of the issues identified by House and the Senate. For Republicans to lose control of both Americans as especially important was the war in Iraq, closely houses of the legislature, the Democrats need net gains of 15 identified with Bush, which the majority of Americans believe House seats and 6 Senate seats. was a mistake to start. The elections are taking place against a backdrop of dimin- In general, when a president’s approval rating is below 50%, that ishing confidence in the performance of Congress. Corruption spells potential trouble for his party in congressional elections. scandals, pork barrel politics, perceptions that politicians are The fact that the U.S. economy has grown at a good pace too beholden to lobbies and political donors, and a widespread would normally be positive for an incumbent party. Despite public belief that the country is heading in the wrong direction, economic growth, however, most Americans do not seem combined to give Congress unusually high disapproval rat- to believe that the economy is heading in the right direc- ings in polls taken this summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideson and Preservation
    Volume 6 • Number 2 • Spring 2009 IDESON AND PRESERVATION UNIVERSITY of H O U S T O N CENTER FOR PUBLIC HISTORY LETTER FROM THE EDITOR Preserving the Past (If Possible) The groundbreaking for Center, and to pursue other civic endeavors. This time, their the new archival wing of efforts were in the interest of historic preservation, a quality of the Julia Ideson Building life issue whose time has come. was something to be- The articles on Julia Ideson and the preservation of the library hold. On a picture perfect building bearing her name celebrate this triumph. What a place Houston spring day in the restored, refurbished, and expanded Ideson building will January, several hundred be. This issue also includes an article on a successful case of people gathered to hear adaptive reuse, the transformation of the M&M Building into the the speeches and watch the main campus building for UH Downtown. It also has an article groundbreaking for the new on one of the most notable failures in historic preservation in wing. Mayor White spoke our city’s history—the demolition of the Shamrock Hilton. As is with enthusiasm about the often true, in this case failure triggered success; the unsuccessful impact of the preservation efforts to save the Shamrock fostered the growth of a stronger and expansion of the Ideson preservationist movement in Houston. Building on future genera- (Old editor’s cranky aside: I acknowledge that the Shamrock tions of Houstonians. was historically significant. But I also spent the night there I left the ceremony convinced that he was not exaggerating.
    [Show full text]