Annual Report of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network Annual Report of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network 10 month period March 1, 2010 through Dec 31, 2010 “Year 7” Cooperative Agreement: ECS-0335765 March. 2011 Participating Institutions: Arizona State University, Cornell University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Howard University, Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University, University of California at Santa Barbara, University of Colorado, University of Michigan, University of Minnesota, University of Texas at Austin, University of Washington, and Washington University in St. Louis 1 National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network 2010‐11 Annual Report Executive Summary Introduction: The National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) is a collective of fourteen university‐based nanotechnology facilities with the mission to enable rapid advancements in nanoscale science, technology and engineering through open and efficient access to advanced processes, equipment, and expertise. Completing its 7th year of operation, NNIN provides a distributed facilities‐ based infrastructure resource that is openly accessible to the nation’s students, scientists and engineers from academe, small and large companies, and national laboratories. It enables the reduction of nanotechnology based ideas to practice by providing the capacity to explore materials, structures, devices and systems through access to tools, training and specialized staff support– all at affordable cost, with minimum administrative barriers and with only a few weeks of preparation following initial contact. NNIN also provides computational resources with an emphasis on advanced scientific computing and modeling at the nanoscale, Figure 1: Institutions of NNIN and the experimental research & particularly in support of experimental efforts, development usage of NNIN during 2010‐11. and in building repositories of trusted critical scientific information, e.g., interatomic and pseudopotentials. NNIN also leverages its infrastructure resources and its geographic and institutional diversity to conduct broader impact activities: in education, in enhancing diversity in technical disciplines, in societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology and in health and environment studies Three new universities were added to NNIN in 2008, expanding NNIN’s expertise in inorganic‐ NNIN Users by Institution Type March 2010‐Dec. 2010 state and fed gov pre‐college organic interfaces through Arizona State 1% 0% University, energy and precision sciences large company foreign 2 year college 3% 1% through University of Colorado and public 0% health and environment through Washington 4 year college small company 1% 12% University in St. Louis. The universities are now other university thoroughly integrated and operating as a 15% networked resource. local site academic 67% Approach and Usage: NNIN supports research by providing extensive equipment and process resources together with strong technical staff support. NNIN’s staff, made possible by the 5405 Unique Users in 10 months leverage of NSF funding, provides the training, process, and project support that are necessary for effective user access to the large instrument set of NNIN sites. Technology resources are optimized by connecting specific technical leadership offerings at a site to the intellectual strengths of the individual institutions, thus offering the most advanced knowledge and instrumentation to the user cost‐effectively. When coupled with geographic diversity, this distributed approach enables balanced NNIN FY10 Annual Report [Type text] Executive Summary 2 and broad support to the nanotechnology community with maximum efficiency and for maximum impact. Through its user program, NNIN directly impacts a significant portion of the nanotechnology research in the US. During the 10 months of operation ending December 2010, 5405 unique users performed a significant part of their experimental work at NNIN facilities. Of these, 4490 were academic users, mostly graduate students, 822 industrial users, 63 users from State and Federal laboratories, and 30 users from foreign institutions. More than 330 small companies used NNIN facilities during this period. Over 2500 publications, several of them the significant scientific and engineering highlights of the year, resulted from the work of the user community. A major task of staff of NNIN is in training of this user community, particularly graduate students from across United States, where there is a continuous and significant turnover. During the 10 month period, 1897 new users were trained across the vast instrument set, large and small, of the facilities. Figure 2: NNIN's major educational activities. Education and Outreach: NNIN has a broad portfolio of education and outreach activities, drawing on its nanotechnology strengths, its geographic and technical diversity, and its ability through this breadth and diversity to make an impact on a national scale. A broad range of National programs (Figure 2) forms the base of the NNIN education program, with those efforts supplemented by local activities reflecting the interests and individuality of the NNIN sites. NNIN, as a network and as individual sites, cooperates significantly with other national and center based nanotechnology education programs. NNIN national education programs include: (a) Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) for a thorough exposure to graduate‐level research to undergraduate students across the breadth of nanosciences and engineering, (b) International Research Experience for Undergraduates (iREU) for an international laboratory exposure mentored by a senior research scientist to a select exceptional group of prior year REU students, (c) Laboratory Experience for Faculty (LEF) that brings research experience opportunity to faculty from under‐represented communities or institutions devoted to under‐represented communities, (c) Showcase for Students, which is a day‐long showcase of nanotechnology at major conferences devoted to underrepresented science and engineering students featuring hands‐on table‐top laboratory demonstrations with short lectures presented at major conferences, (d) international Winter School for Graduate Students (iWSG), which teaches an advanced emerging nanotechnology subject area to a select group of US graduate students at a 3rd world institution combined with a rural field experience to appreciate the context in which technology impacts a large portion of the world’s population, (e) Symposia ‐ four times a year on major technical themes that bring together leaders for talks and discussions with users/participants to define challenges of critical/emerging/changing areas and possible NNIN contributions to them, (f) Nanooze, a web and print science magazine for middle school children, featuring interesting content delivered in an engaging manner, in support of curriculum and enrichment activity, (f) Open Textbook, a web‐based senior/graduate level text that grows and changes with learning of the field, and ( g) Technical Workshops, which are topical and hands‐on workshops connected to research. Nearly 34,000 people NNIN FY10 Annual Report [Type text] Executive Summary 3 have participated in these events during the year, including nearly a thousand in the technically rigorous workshops and symposia. During 2010, NNIN’s symposia included two: Synergies in Nanoscale Manufacturing and Research and Interdisciplinary Challenges Beyond Moore’s Law that had a significant impact vector on federally supported research. Each brought together an invited group of leading academic and industrial researchers to examine the future of nanotechnology in these critical areas. Proceedings from both symposia are available on the NNIN web site. Local activities from NNIN include day and longer camps for middle and high school students, local outreach through workshops for teachers, school and community‐connected activities, and from Howard University, a laboratory on wheels that brings nanotechnology activities to high schools in eastern part of the country. Figure 3: Selections from two issues of Nanooze. Up to 100 thousand Computation and Modeling: As a copies of each issue of the print edition are distributed to classrooms complement to its laboratory support around the country, free of charge. resources, NNIN provides extensive computational and modeling resources in support of interdisciplinary problems that bring together theory and experiment. NNIN computational scientists (Ph.D. level, “Domain Experts”) are available to support both experienced computational scientist as well as to experimentalists new to the computational area. In such cases, a domain expert staff member can help with selecting appropriate codes and modifying open source codes to extract new or novel information. Domain experts are in residence at Harvard and Cornell for science and engineering of problems evolving from condensed matter, at Stanford for problems evolving from interfaces, molecular dynamics and materials science, and at Michigan for problems evolving from fluidics and mechanics. In addition, NNIN has been expanding its initiative of providing a repository and archive of trusted the pseudo‐potentials, interatomic potentials, input structure files, etc. This archive preserves and distributes vetted resources to computational scientists, providing a significant boost to both experienced and novice users. Nearly 300 scientific research users, most of whom are graduate students, employ NNIN computational resources.
Recommended publications
  • A Course in Micro and Nanoscale Mechanics
    Session 1168 A Course in Micro- and Nanoscale Mechanics Wendy C. Crone, Robert W. Carpick, Kenneth W. Lux, Buck D. Johnson Department of Engineering Physics, Engineering Mechanics Program, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Materials Research Science and Engineering Center on Nanostructured Materials and Interfaces, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA Abstract At small scales, mechanics enters a new regime where the role of surfaces, interfaces, defects, material property variations, and quantum effects play more dominant roles. A new course in nanoscale mechanics for engineering students was recently taught at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. This course provided an introduction to nanoscale engineering with a direct focus on the critical role that mechanics needs to play in this developing area. The limits of continuum mechanics were presented as well as newly developed mechanics theories and experiments tailored to study and describe micro- and nano-scale phenomena. Numerous demonstrations and experiments were used throughout the course, including synthesis and fabrication techniques for creating nanostructured materials, bubble raft models to demonstrate size scale effects in thin film structures, and a laboratory project to construct a nanofilter device. A primary focus of this paper is the laboratory content of this course, which includes an integrated series of laboratory modules utilizing atomic force microscopy, self-assembled monolayer deposition, and microfluidic technology. Introduction Nanoscale science and technology are inspiring a new industrial revolution that some predict will rival the development of the automobile and the introduction of the personal computer.1 By observing and manipulating materials at the nanoscale, researchers have been able to develop new materials with novel and extreme properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Online Nanoeducation Resources
    Chapter 6 Online Nanoeducation Resources Sidney R. Cohen, Ron Blonder, Shelley Rap, and Jack Barokas Abstract The internet has influenced all aspects of modern society, yet likely none more than education—opening new possibilities for how, where, and when we learn. Nanoscience and nanotechnology have developed over a similar time frame as the rapid growth of the internet and thus the use of the internet for nanoscience education serves as an interesting paradigm for internet-enabled education in general. In this chapter we give an overview of use of internet in nanoeducation, first in terms of available resources, then by describing the technological, philo- sophical, and pedagogical approaches. In order to illustrate the concepts, we describe as example a for-credit nanoscience curriculum which the authors devel- oped recently as part of an international team. 6.1 Introduction and Background The nature and emphasis of education in formal pedagogical frameworks as well as informal learning has been irreversibly impacted by the world-wide web and other rapidly changing technologies. Online resources have become a major source of information and knowledge, replacing texts and face-to-face (F2F) traditional courses. In the past decade, complete course materials have been made public, ranging from uploaded lecture notes to full video recorded class presentations. Various degrees of interactivity have been implemented in the different formats [1]. Whether it is medical assays, materials, or devices, nanotechnology has firmly rooted itself in our modern lives. In order to meet the growing need for scientists, engineers, and technicians to service and further develop this trend, the educational system must provide suitable training [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book
    Plenary Lecture 1 Nanotechnology Path to Sustainable Society Mihail Roco (National Science Foundation and National Nanotechnology Initiative) Abstract: Nanoscale science and engineering supports a foundational technology with implications on sustainability of economy, environment and overall societal development. Special challenges are balanced, equitable and safe affirmation of the technology. By establishing controlled synthesis and processing of matter at the nanoscale, nanotechnology would require fewer amounts of materials, water, and energy; and with the high degree of precision in nanomanufacturing we are generating less pollution for the same functionality. This presentation will focus on evolution of priorities since 2000. The long-view of nanotechnology development has three stages, each dominated by a different focus: phenomenological basics and synthesis of nanocomponents (2000-2010), nanosystem integration by design for fundamentally new products (2010-2020), and creation of new technology platforms based on new nanosystem architectures (2020-2030)(www.wtec.org/nano2/). Such development raises significant sustainability opportunities and challenges. Nanoscale science and engineering is expected to converge with biotechnology, information technology, cognitive technologies and other knowledge and technology domains resulting in an increase of the complexity and uncertainty of the secondary effects (“Converging Knowledge, Technology and Society: Beyond Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies”, Springer 2013, www.wtec.org/NBIC2-Report/).
    [Show full text]
  • Nanotechnology in New South Wales
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Standing Committee on State Development Nanotechnology in New South Wales Ordered to be printed 29 October 2008 Report 33 - October 2008 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Nanotechnology in New South Wales New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Nanotechnology in NSW : [report] / Standing Committee on State Development. [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2008. – 180 p. ; 30 cm. (Report / Standing Committee on State Development ; no.33) Chair: Tony Catanzariti, MLC. “October 2008”. ISBN 9781920788209) 1. Nanotechnology—New South Wales. I. Title II. Title: Nanotechnology in New South Wales. III. Catanzariti, Tony. IV. New South Wales. Parliament. Standing Committee on State Development. Report ; no. 33 620.5 (DDC22) ii Report 33 - October 2008 STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT How to contact the Committee Members of the Standing Committee on State Development can be contacted through the Committee Secretariat. Written correspondence and enquiries should be directed to: The Director Standing Committee on State Development Legislative Council Parliament House, Macquarie Street Sydney New South Wales 2000 Internet www.parliament.nsw.gov.au Email [email protected] Telephone 02 9230 3504 Facsimile 02 9230 2981 Report 33 - October 2008 iii LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Nanotechnology in New South Wales Terms of reference 1. That the Standing Committee on State Development inquire into and report on nanotechnology in New South Wales, in particular: a. current and future applications of nanotechnology for New South Wales industry and the New South Wales community b. the health, safety and environmental risks and benefits of nanotechnology c.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    Annual Report 2007 ANNUAL REPORT 2007 MISSION STATEMENT AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................. 3 Mission Statement....................................................................................................................... 3 Year 3 in Review ........................................................................................................................ 4 Structure and Management ......................................................................................................... 5 ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN BY ARCNN................................................................................. 9 DISTINGUISHED LECTURER TOURS ................................................................................ 11 Prof Jacob Israelachvili........................................................................................................ 11 Prof E.G. Wang.................................................................................................................... 12 Prof Selim Ünlü ................................................................................................................... 13 Dr H C Liu ........................................................................................................................... 15 SPECIAL LECTURES ............................................................................................................. 16 Prof Hiroaki Misawa...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual 2016-2017
    ANNUAL 2016-2017 REPORT UCSB MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE | UC SANTA BARBARA Table of Contents Director’s Statement 3 Organizational Charts 5 Administrative Staff 6 Centers and Units 7 Other Projects & Activities 8 Seminars, Workshops, Conferences, and Meetings 9 Coastal Research Center 11 Marine Biotechnology Center 13 Ocean and Coastal Policy Center 20 UC Natural Reserve System 21 Analytical Laboratory 23 Education and Outreach 24 Awards Administered 25 Awards 26 Research Summaries 36 Space 129 Statistical Summary 135 Research Support Summary 136 Statistical Summary 2015-2016 138 Five-Year Research Support Summary 140 Funding Agencies 143 MSI Advisory Committee, 145 Administrative & Technical Staff Principal Investigators 148 2 DIRECTor’s STATEMENT 3 Director’s Statement As we move towards MSI’s 50th anniversary in 2019 the Marine Science Institute our scientists continue on a trajectory of engaging in cutting edge research and of solving pressing problems in ocean science. Our research portfolio continues to diversify with an ever growing set of funders representing a very large array of government agencies, private industry, non-profit foundations and individuals. Discoveries by MSI researchers are revealing wondrous new aspects of ocean systems from new insights into the ecology of coral reefs to the effects of ocean acidification. This new knowledge continues to improve our basic understanding of the seas and the wide range of services that they provide to society. I am proud of the contribution that our scientist make to society’s knowledge as these discoveries continually teach us how to be better stewards of the ocean realm. While ocean discovery is key to our mission, MSI researchers also act on this knowledge to solve pressing issues associated with the constructive use of ocean resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Marinemarine Science Science Institute Institute |• UC UC Santa Santa Barbara Barbara 2013 2014
    ANNUAL REPORT MarineMarine Science Science Institute Institute |• UC UC Santa Santa Barbara Barbara 2013 2014 ANNUAL REPORT | 2013-2014 1 ANNUAL REPORT | 2013-2014 Table of Contents Director’s Statement 3 Organizational Charts 5 Administrative Staff 6 Centers and Units 7 Other Projects and Activities 8 Seminars, Workshops, Conferences, and Meetings 9 Coastal Research Center 17 EcoInformatics Center 19 Marine Biotechnology Center 21 National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis 23 Ocean and Coastal Policy Center 25 UC Natural Reserve System 26 Analytical Laboratory 28 REEF/Outreach 29 Awards Administered 30 Awards 31 Research Summaries 39 Space 142 Statistical Summary 148 Research Support Summary 149 Statistical Summary 2013-2014 151 Five-Year Research Support Summary 153 Funding Agencies 156 MSI Advisory Committee, 158 Administrative and Technical Staff Principal Investigators 161 2 ANNUAL REPORT | 2013-2014 Director’s Statement 3 ANNUAL REPORT | 2013-2014 Director’s Statement This year marks the 10th anniversary of the opening of the Marine Science Institute’s Marine Science Research Building, a state-of-the-art facility located on the bluff overlooking the Pacific Ocean on the eastern edge of the University of California, Santa Barbara’s campus. It is an inspiring facility and location, and it has taken the hard work of many individuals to make it a reality. At UCSB in the 1980’s and 1990’s, Marine Science facilities could be described as dispersed, inadequate, and not up to the standards of a world class research institution. Long-standing efforts to get a facility approved and built had met with no success. However, things began to change with the identification of a State of California program that provided a financing mechanism for research facilities dedicated to long-term scientific activities.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT Marine Science Institute UC SANTA BARBARA Table of Contents
    2018–2019 ANNUAL REPORT Marine Science Institute UC SANTA BARBARA Table of Contents 3 Mission Statement 4 From the Director Overview 5 Executive Summary 7 10 Organizational Charts Administrative Staff 11 Centers and Units 12 13 MSI Advisory Committee, Administrative & Technical Staff 16 Statistical Summary Research Support Summary 17 Statistical Summary 2018–2019 19 Five-Year Research Support 21 Summary Funding Agencies 22 24 Principal Investigators 30 Postdoctoral Researchers, Graduate and Undergraduate Students 33 Space 39 Other Projects & Activities Coastal Research Center 40 Marine Biotechnology Center 42 Ocean & Coastal Policy Center 52 Analytical Laboratory 54 Education and Outreach 55 56 Awards Administered Awards 57 Research Summaries 66 2 Mission Statement The Marine Science Institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara, is committed to fostering innovative and significant research, to promoting effective stewardship, and to sharing exciting discoveries of the world’s oceans. 3 From the Director 4 Overview The Marine Science Institute (MSI) provides an intellectual and physical environment at UCSB that fosters world-renowned marine research. The institute brings together marine researchers from across the UCSB campus and supports multi-investigator collaborative projects and individual research efforts. The scientific membership at MSI consists of both ladder faculty and professional researchers. In 2018-2019 MSI membership included 25 ladder faculty and 32 professional researchers with 228 additional participants distributed across postdoctoral scholars, graduate students and undergraduates. Beyond research, MSI’s Research Experience and Education Facility (REEF) educates UCSB students and the general public about MSI science. MSI is housed in the marine science research building (MSRB) on the UCSB campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Tradeoffs Among Ecosystem Services to Inform Marine Spatial Planning
    Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning Lester, S. E., Costello, C., Halpern, B. S., Gaines, S. D., White, C., & Barth, J. A. (2013). Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 38, 80-89. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.022 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.022 Elsevier Accepted Manuscript http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse 1 Title: Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning 2 3 Sarah E. Lestera, Christopher Costellob, Benjamin S. Halpernc, Steven D. Gainesd, Crow Whitee, 4 John A. Barthf 5 6 a Marine Science Institute and Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, 7 University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150, USA. [email protected] 8 b Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, 4410 Bren Hall, University of 9 California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. [email protected] 10 c National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State Street, Suite 300, Santa 11 Barbara, CA 93101, USA. [email protected] 12 d Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, 4410 Bren Hall, University of 13 California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. [email protected] 14 e Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, 4410 Bren Hall, University of 15 California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. [email protected] 16 f College of Oceanic & Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 COAS Admin Bldg, 17 Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. [email protected] 18 19 Corresponding author: 20 Sarah E. Lester 21 Marine Science Institute / Bren School of Environmental Science & Management 22 University of California 23 Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150, USA 24 Ph: 805.893.5175 25 Fax: 805.893.8062 26 Email: [email protected] 27 28 Running Title: Ecosystem service tradeoffs 1 Ecosystem service tradeoffs 1 Abstract 2 A central challenge for natural resource management is developing rigorous yet practical 3 approaches for balancing the costs and benefits of diverse human uses of ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Enriching the Health of Physics Education
    Enriching the Health of Physics Education 2008 AAPT Winter Welcome to Baltimore .............. 3 Meeting Acknowledgments .................... 4 Meeting Information ................. 6 Baltimore, MD Contact Information ................. 6 Bus Schedule ............................ 7 About Baltimore ....................... 8 Special Events ......................... 10 January 19–23 Exhibitors ............................... 12 Baltimore Marriott Award Winners & Plenaries ..... 16 Committee Meetings .............. 23 Waterfront Hotel Meeting at a Glance ............... 24 Workshop Abstracts ................ 28 Commercial Workshops .......... 34 SUNDAY Poster Sessions ......... 38 MONDAY Sessions ................. .40 TUESDAY Sessions .................. 66 WEDNESDAY Sessions ............. 84 Index of Participants ................ 90 Index of Advertisers ................ 92 Donors .................................... 93 Maps ...................................... 94 Future Meetings ...................... 96 American Association of Physics Teachers One Physics Ellipse College Park, MD USA 20740-3845 301-209-3300, fax: 301-209-0845 [email protected], www.aapt.org InterActions Makes Its Official Debut at the 2008 Winter Meeting What Is InterActions? – The people, places, programs and policies defining physics teaching and learning – A glimpse Inside the physics education community openforum Synopsis iAmonitor QandA Focal Point ilearn Insight causeeffect endpoint Inside InterActions – human interest in physics Welcome to Baltimore Welcome to the
    [Show full text]
  • (ATMAE) Accreditation Report for Industrial Technology
    2019 Self-Study Accreditation Report for the Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology at Prepared by: Department of Technology March 14, 2019 2 Table of Contents I. The On-Site Visit ........................................................................................................ 6 A. Date of Visit ...................................................................................................... 6 B. Visiting Team Members ................................................................................... 6 C. Proposed On-Site Visit Agenda ....................................................................... 6 D. Current Accreditation Status of Program ......................................................... 8 II. General Information ................................................................................................. 8 A. The Institution ................................................................................................... 8 1. Name and Address. .................................................................................... 8 2. Number of Students Enrolled. ..................................................................... 8 a. Total. ....................................................................................................... 8 b. Full-time. ................................................................................................. 8 c. Part-time. ................................................................................................. 8 d. Full-time Equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • A University-Community College Partnership Model for Meaningful
    CENTER FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AND UTILIZATION A University‐Community College Partnership Model for Meaningful Advanced Manufacturing Workforce Education Osama O. Awadelkarim Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics Associate Director, Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization & the NSF National Nanotechnology Applications and Career Knowledge (NACK) Network CENTER FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AND UTILIZATION Presentation Outline 1) Historical 2) CNEU/NACK Approach 3) Resource Sharing and the Pennsylvania Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology Partnership 4) NACK Partnership and How it Works 5) What the Community Colleges Find Helpful 6) What the Community Colleges Utilize 7) Advantages to Research University in Partnering with Local Community Colleges, Colleges, and Small Universities 8) How to Implement Model for Other Advanced Manufacturing Fields 9) Conclusion Historical • Penn State’s Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization (CNEU) established in 1998. Focused on education across all aspects of micro‐ and nanofabrication • With PA state support PA Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology (PA NMT) Partnership for nanofabrication workforce development established at CNEU in 1998 • National Science Foundation (NSF) Advanced Technology Education (ATE) Regional Center for nanotechnology workforce development at CNEU from 2001 to 2008 (National role since 2005) • NSF ATE National Nanotechnology Applications and Career Knowledge (NACK) Center created at CNEU in 2008 and funded through 2012 • Renewed by
    [Show full text]