DOCSLIB.ORG

(ATMAE) Accreditation Report for Industrial Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(ATMAE) Accreditation Report for Industrial Technology 2019 Self-Study Accreditation Report for the Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology at Prepared by: Department of Technology March 14, 2019 2 Table of Contents I. The On-Site Visit ........................................................................................................ 6 A. Date of Visit ...................................................................................................... 6 B. Visiting Team Members ................................................................................... 6 C. Proposed On-Site Visit Agenda ....................................................................... 6 D. Current Accreditation Status of Program ......................................................... 8 II. General Information ................................................................................................. 8 A. The Institution ................................................................................................... 8 1. Name and Address. .................................................................................... 8 2. Number of Students Enrolled. ..................................................................... 8 a. Total. ....................................................................................................... 8 b. Full-time. ................................................................................................. 8 c. Part-time. ................................................................................................. 8 d. Full-time Equivalent. ................................................................................ 8 3. Total Full-time Equivalent Funding. ............................................................. 9 4. Operating Budget. ....................................................................................... 9 a. Current. ................................................................................................... 9 b. Five-Year History. ................................................................................... 9 5. Institutional Accreditation Organizations and Dates of Accreditation. ....... 10 6. History of Accreditation by ATMAE. .......................................................... 11 7. Administration of the Institution. ................................................................ 11 a. Chief Executive Officer. ......................................................................... 11 b. Chief Academic Officer. ........................................................................ 11 8. Major Academic Units Within the Institution. ............................................. 11 9. Institution Mission and Goals. ................................................................... 11 10. Relationship of Institution to Superior Governing Body. .......................... 34 B. Administrative Unit Information ...................................................................... 35 1. Name and Address of Institution and/or Department Administrative Unit. 35 2. Name of Dean and Department Head. ...................................................... 36 3. Names of Other Departments in Administrative Unit. ................................ 36 4. Name and Titles of Others with Program Administration Responsibility. ... 36 5. Title of Programs for Which Accreditation is Being Requested. ................ 36 6. Operating Budget for Administrative Unit in Which the Program Resides. 36 a. Current. ................................................................................................. 36 b. Five-Year History. ................................................................................. 37 Standard 1 - Preparation of Self-Study and Campus Visit ....................................... 38 Standard 2 - Program Definition ............................................................................... 39 Standard 3 - Program Title, Mission, and Program Outcomes ............................... 40 3.1 - Program Title, Mission is Compatible with ATMAE Definition ....... 40 3.2 - General Program Outcomes Shall Be Established ........................ 41 Standard 4 - Program Goals ...................................................................................... 41 Standard 5 – Program Learning Outcomes Identification & Validation .................. 46 3 Standard 6 - Program Structure & Course Sequencing .......................................... 47 6.1 - Program Minimum Curriculum Foundation .................................... 47 6.2 - Appropriate Laboratory Acivities .................................................... 48 6.3 - Appropriate Sequencing of Courses .............................................. 49 6.4 - Advanced Level Course Sequencing ............................................ 50 Standard 7 – Student Admission & Retention Standards ........................................ 50 Standard 8 - Transfer Course Work .......................................................................... 57 Standard 9 – Student Enrollment ............................................................................... 57 Standard 10 - Administrative Support & Faculty Qualifications ............................. 59 10.1 - Qualified Administrators Assigned to Program ............................ 59 10.2 - Adequate Number of Qualified Full-time Faculty ......................... 61 10.3 - Faculty Qualifications .................................................................. 61 10.4 - Policies and Procedures for Selecting and Retaining Faculty ..... 62 10.5 - Faculty Teaching Loads .............................................................. 64 10.6 - Faculty Qualifications for Part-time & Non-tenure Track Faculty . 64 Standard 11 – Facilities, Equipment & Technical Support ...................................... 64 11.1 - Appropriate Technical Support .................................................... 65 11.2 - Adequate Computer Equipment and Software ............................ 65 11.3 - Facility and Equipment Needs Included in Long-range Goals ..... 66 Standard 12 - Program Operation ............................................................................. 74 12.1 - Scheduling of Instruction ............................................................. 74 12.2 - Quality of Instruction .................................................................... 75 12.3 - Observance of Safety Standards ................................................. 75 12.4 - Availability of Resource Materials ................................................ 76 12.5 - Teaching and Measurement of Competencies ............................ 77 12.6 - Supervision of Instruction ............................................................ 83 12.7 - Placement Services Available to Graduates ............................... 84 12.8 - Syllabi Must Clearly Describe Appropriate Course Objectives .... 84 12.9 - Student Learning Comp. Mapped with Program Outcomes ........ 85 12.10 - Quality of Distance Learning Course Work................................. 86 Standard 13 – Graduate Satisfaction with Program ................................................. 86 Standard 14 - Employment of Graduates ................................................................. 87 Standard 15 - Job Advancement of Graduates ........................................................ 89 Standard 16 – Employer Satisfaction with Job Performance .................................. 90 Standard 17 - Advisory Committee Approval of Overall Program ......................... 90 17.1 - Policies for Advisory Committee .................................................. 91 4 17.2 - Roster and Minutes of Advisory Committee Meetings ................. 92 17.3 - Evidence of Advisory Committee Program Outcome Validation .. 94 Standard 18 – Outcome Measures Used to Improve Program ................................ 94 Standard 19 - Program Responsibility to Provide Information to the Public ...... 101 List of Tables Table 1 - Fall 2018 Student FTE .................................................................................... 8 Table 2 - Total University Enrollment AY 2014-2018...................................................... 8 Table 3 - Total Number of Faculty by Tenure, Rank, and Gender .................................. 9 Table 4 - The University Budget for FY 2019 and the Previous Five Years ................... 9 Table 5 - University Operating Expenditures FY 2013-2015 ........................................ 10 Table 6 - Industrial Technology Program Prerequisites................................................ 50 Table 7 - ACT and SAT Scores – UT Tyler and State Means ...................................... 55 Table 8 - The University of Texas at Tyler GPA by Academic Plan – Fall 2018 ........... 55 Table 9 - Department of Technology – Retention by Major .......................................... 57 Table 10 - Industrial Technology Program Enrollment from 2013-2018 ....................... 58 Table 11 - Number of Industrial Technology Graduates from 2014-2018 ..................... 59 Table 12 - Academic Preparation of Full-time Faculty Teaching Ind. Tech. Courses. .. 62 Table 13 - 2012-2019 Equipment & Materials Expenditures for the Dept. of Tech. ...... 66 Table 14 - Assessment Method for Core, Technology, & Mgmt. Competencies .......... 79 Table 15 - Core Comptencies Mapped with Courses ................................................... 80 Table 16 - Technology & Mgmt. Competencies Mapped with Courses ........................ 82 Table 17
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Course in Micro and Nanoscale Mechanics
    Session 1168 A Course in Micro- and Nanoscale Mechanics Wendy C. Crone, Robert W. Carpick, Kenneth W. Lux, Buck D. Johnson Department of Engineering Physics, Engineering Mechanics Program, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Materials Research Science and Engineering Center on Nanostructured Materials and Interfaces, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA Abstract At small scales, mechanics enters a new regime where the role of surfaces, interfaces, defects, material property variations, and quantum effects play more dominant roles. A new course in nanoscale mechanics for engineering students was recently taught at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. This course provided an introduction to nanoscale engineering with a direct focus on the critical role that mechanics needs to play in this developing area. The limits of continuum mechanics were presented as well as newly developed mechanics theories and experiments tailored to study and describe micro- and nano-scale phenomena. Numerous demonstrations and experiments were used throughout the course, including synthesis and fabrication techniques for creating nanostructured materials, bubble raft models to demonstrate size scale effects in thin film structures, and a laboratory project to construct a nanofilter device. A primary focus of this paper is the laboratory content of this course, which includes an integrated series of laboratory modules utilizing atomic force microscopy, self-assembled monolayer deposition, and microfluidic technology. Introduction Nanoscale science and technology are inspiring a new industrial revolution that some predict will rival the development of the automobile and the introduction of the personal computer.1 By observing and manipulating materials at the nanoscale, researchers have been able to develop new materials with novel and extreme properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Online Nanoeducation Resources
    Chapter 6 Online Nanoeducation Resources Sidney R. Cohen, Ron Blonder, Shelley Rap, and Jack Barokas Abstract The internet has influenced all aspects of modern society, yet likely none more than education—opening new possibilities for how, where, and when we learn. Nanoscience and nanotechnology have developed over a similar time frame as the rapid growth of the internet and thus the use of the internet for nanoscience education serves as an interesting paradigm for internet-enabled education in general. In this chapter we give an overview of use of internet in nanoeducation, first in terms of available resources, then by describing the technological, philo- sophical, and pedagogical approaches. In order to illustrate the concepts, we describe as example a for-credit nanoscience curriculum which the authors devel- oped recently as part of an international team. 6.1 Introduction and Background The nature and emphasis of education in formal pedagogical frameworks as well as informal learning has been irreversibly impacted by the world-wide web and other rapidly changing technologies. Online resources have become a major source of information and knowledge, replacing texts and face-to-face (F2F) traditional courses. In the past decade, complete course materials have been made public, ranging from uploaded lecture notes to full video recorded class presentations. Various degrees of interactivity have been implemented in the different formats [1]. Whether it is medical assays, materials, or devices, nanotechnology has firmly rooted itself in our modern lives. In order to meet the growing need for scientists, engineers, and technicians to service and further develop this trend, the educational system must provide suitable training [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book
    Plenary Lecture 1 Nanotechnology Path to Sustainable Society Mihail Roco (National Science Foundation and National Nanotechnology Initiative) Abstract: Nanoscale science and engineering supports a foundational technology with implications on sustainability of economy, environment and overall societal development. Special challenges are balanced, equitable and safe affirmation of the technology. By establishing controlled synthesis and processing of matter at the nanoscale, nanotechnology would require fewer amounts of materials, water, and energy; and with the high degree of precision in nanomanufacturing we are generating less pollution for the same functionality. This presentation will focus on evolution of priorities since 2000. The long-view of nanotechnology development has three stages, each dominated by a different focus: phenomenological basics and synthesis of nanocomponents (2000-2010), nanosystem integration by design for fundamentally new products (2010-2020), and creation of new technology platforms based on new nanosystem architectures (2020-2030)(www.wtec.org/nano2/). Such development raises significant sustainability opportunities and challenges. Nanoscale science and engineering is expected to converge with biotechnology, information technology, cognitive technologies and other knowledge and technology domains resulting in an increase of the complexity and uncertainty of the secondary effects (“Converging Knowledge, Technology and Society: Beyond Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies”, Springer 2013, www.wtec.org/NBIC2-Report/).
    [Show full text]
  • Nanotechnology in New South Wales
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Standing Committee on State Development Nanotechnology in New South Wales Ordered to be printed 29 October 2008 Report 33 - October 2008 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Nanotechnology in New South Wales New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Nanotechnology in NSW : [report] / Standing Committee on State Development. [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2008. – 180 p. ; 30 cm. (Report / Standing Committee on State Development ; no.33) Chair: Tony Catanzariti, MLC. “October 2008”. ISBN 9781920788209) 1. Nanotechnology—New South Wales. I. Title II. Title: Nanotechnology in New South Wales. III. Catanzariti, Tony. IV. New South Wales. Parliament. Standing Committee on State Development. Report ; no. 33 620.5 (DDC22) ii Report 33 - October 2008 STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT How to contact the Committee Members of the Standing Committee on State Development can be contacted through the Committee Secretariat. Written correspondence and enquiries should be directed to: The Director Standing Committee on State Development Legislative Council Parliament House, Macquarie Street Sydney New South Wales 2000 Internet www.parliament.nsw.gov.au Email [email protected] Telephone 02 9230 3504 Facsimile 02 9230 2981 Report 33 - October 2008 iii LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Nanotechnology in New South Wales Terms of reference 1. That the Standing Committee on State Development inquire into and report on nanotechnology in New South Wales, in particular: a. current and future applications of nanotechnology for New South Wales industry and the New South Wales community b. the health, safety and environmental risks and benefits of nanotechnology c.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    Annual Report 2007 ANNUAL REPORT 2007 MISSION STATEMENT AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................. 3 Mission Statement....................................................................................................................... 3 Year 3 in Review ........................................................................................................................ 4 Structure and Management ......................................................................................................... 5 ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN BY ARCNN................................................................................. 9 DISTINGUISHED LECTURER TOURS ................................................................................ 11 Prof Jacob Israelachvili........................................................................................................ 11 Prof E.G. Wang.................................................................................................................... 12 Prof Selim Ünlü ................................................................................................................... 13 Dr H C Liu ........................................................................................................................... 15 SPECIAL LECTURES ............................................................................................................. 16 Prof Hiroaki Misawa...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A University-Community College Partnership Model for Meaningful
    CENTER FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AND UTILIZATION A University‐Community College Partnership Model for Meaningful Advanced Manufacturing Workforce Education Osama O. Awadelkarim Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics Associate Director, Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization & the NSF National Nanotechnology Applications and Career Knowledge (NACK) Network CENTER FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AND UTILIZATION Presentation Outline 1) Historical 2) CNEU/NACK Approach 3) Resource Sharing and the Pennsylvania Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology Partnership 4) NACK Partnership and How it Works 5) What the Community Colleges Find Helpful 6) What the Community Colleges Utilize 7) Advantages to Research University in Partnering with Local Community Colleges, Colleges, and Small Universities 8) How to Implement Model for Other Advanced Manufacturing Fields 9) Conclusion Historical • Penn State’s Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization (CNEU) established in 1998. Focused on education across all aspects of micro‐ and nanofabrication • With PA state support PA Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology (PA NMT) Partnership for nanofabrication workforce development established at CNEU in 1998 • National Science Foundation (NSF) Advanced Technology Education (ATE) Regional Center for nanotechnology workforce development at CNEU from 2001 to 2008 (National role since 2005) • NSF ATE National Nanotechnology Applications and Career Knowledge (NACK) Center created at CNEU in 2008 and funded through 2012 • Renewed by
    [Show full text]
  • A Profile of Nanotechnology Degree Programs in the United States
    CNS-ASU Report #R09-0001 Heldrich Center’s Education Report May 2009 A Profile of Nanotechnology Degree Programs in the United States Carl Van Horn Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Jennifer Cleary Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Leela Hebbar Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey and Aaron Fichtner Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development Edward J. Bloustein School for Planning and Public Policy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey The Center for Nanotechnology in Society Arizona State University This research was conducted as part of the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (CNS‐ASU). CNS‐ASU research, education and outreach activities are supported by the National Science Foundation under cooperative agreement #0531194. Education Report May 2009 CNS‐ASU Report #R09‐0001 This report is the third in a three-part workforce assessment study series that explores the emerging effects of nanotechnology on the demand for, and educational preparation of, skilled workers. The series was designed to build policy-relevant knowledge of the labor market dynamics of nanotechnology-enabled industries and to foster better alignment of nanotechnology education with the skill needs of employers. The first report, The Workforce Needs of Companies Engaged in Nanotechnology Research in Arizona, used interviews, focus groups, and an on-line questionnaire to profile a single labor market - identifying the skill needs of high-tech companies in Arizona and the types of nanotechnology educational programs being developed at post-secondary institutions in the region. In the second report, The Workforce Needs of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Companies in New Jersey That Use Nanotechnology, researchers used interviews of representatives from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to understand nanotechnology employer needs in New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management of ENM-Containing Solid Waste in Europe
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 06, 2021 Waste management of ENM-containing solid waste in Europe Heggelund, Laura Roverskov; Boldrin, Alessio; Hansen, Steffen Foss Published in: Sustainable Nanotechnology Conference 2015 Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Heggelund, L. R., Boldrin, A., & Hansen, S. F. (2015). Waste management of ENM-containing solid waste in Europe. In Sustainable Nanotechnology Conference 2015: Conference abstracts General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Plenary Lecture 1 Nanotechnology Path to Sustainable Society Mihail Roco (National Science Foundation and National Nanotechnology Initiative) Abstract: Nanoscale science and engineering supports a foundational technology with implications on sustainability of economy, environment and overall societal development. Special challenges are balanced, equitable and safe affirmation of the technology. By establishing controlled synthesis and processing of matter at the nanoscale, nanotechnology would require fewer amounts of materials, water, and energy; and with the high degree of precision in nanomanufacturing we are generating less pollution for the same functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) – the Next Steps
    Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) – the Next Steps Workshop Report December 11-12, 2014 Arlington, Virginia Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Award Number: EEC-144807 Dr. James Murday University of Southern California Acknowledgements Organizing Committee Dr. James Murday, University of Southern California, Chair Dr. Lisa Friedersdorf, National Nanotechnology Coordination Office Dr. Christopher Cannizzaro, Department of State, NSET liaison to OECD Mr. Larry Bell, Boston Museum of Science Ms. Deb Newberry, Dakota County Technical College (DCTC) and Nano-Link Dr. Patricia Simmons, NC State Univ. and National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Dr. Celia Merzbacher, Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) Dr. Lars Montelius, Univ. of Lund, Sweden and International Nanotechnology Laboratory, PT Dr. Ana-Rita Mayol, University of Pennsylvania (formerly University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras) Sponsors The workshop was sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF): Dr. Mihail Roco Senior Advisor for Nanotechnology National Science Foundation Dr. Mary Poats Engineering Education and Human Resource Development Division of Engineering Education and Centers National Science Foundation 1 Contributing Authors The author wishes to acknowledge the important contributions of Dr. Lisa Friedersdorf, Dr. Quinn Spadola, and Daniel Suzuki in improving the content, style and presentation of this report. The author would like to thank the note takers during the breakout sessions: Amber Gray, Jay Goodwin, Shelah Morita, Ashley
    [Show full text]
  • The Seventh Annual Emerging Information and Technology Conference
    The Seventh Annual Emerging Information And Technology Conference Nanotechnology, System-on-Chip, Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, C4I, Emerging Energy Technology, AABF Workshops August 9 – August 10 (Thursday, Friday), 2007 Friend Center, Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A. In Memoriam EITC/AABF (Asian American Business Forum) advisory board member, the conference co-organizer of EITC-2007, and founding partner for PBI Tech Partners, Mr. Pao-Chien (Daniel) Di, passed away unexpectedly on Thursday, July 12, 2007 at his home in Monroe, New Jersey. He was 49. Born and raised in Taiwan, Daniel received his graduate degree in electric engineering in US in 1984. During the early part of his career, he worked for many prestigious information technology companies. His keen sense of business advanced him to VP of operation and business development for Foxconn in 2001-the turning point of his late career toward business, finance and investments. He was an amazing person and loved learning new things. After obtaining his EMBA degree from Wharton School at U. Penn, he enrolled himself into Stern Business School at NYU. Daniel enjoyed assisting others through his personal connections. Born with great leadership, he used his influential power to help change the world around him. Much of his spare time was dedicated to the Chinese community services. He was the principal of a Chinese school and board member and chairman for many non-profit organizations. This, however, was only the prologue to his great vision: he wished to see more of the Chinese community to get involved in the public service and infuse more political influence at the state and federal levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network
    Annual Report of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network 10 month period March 1, 2010 through Dec 31, 2010 “Year 7” Cooperative Agreement: ECS-0335765 March. 2011 Participating Institutions: Arizona State University, Cornell University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Howard University, Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University, University of California at Santa Barbara, University of Colorado, University of Michigan, University of Minnesota, University of Texas at Austin, University of Washington, and Washington University in St. Louis 1 National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network 2010‐11 Annual Report Executive Summary Introduction: The National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) is a collective of fourteen university‐based nanotechnology facilities with the mission to enable rapid advancements in nanoscale science, technology and engineering through open and efficient access to advanced processes, equipment, and expertise. Completing its 7th year of operation, NNIN provides a distributed facilities‐ based infrastructure resource that is openly accessible to the nation’s students, scientists and engineers from academe, small and large companies, and national laboratories. It enables the reduction of nanotechnology based ideas to practice by providing the capacity to explore materials, structures, devices and systems through access to tools, training and specialized staff support– all at affordable cost, with minimum administrative barriers and with only a few weeks of preparation following initial contact. NNIN also provides computational resources with an emphasis on advanced scientific computing and modeling at the nanoscale, Figure 1: Institutions of NNIN and the experimental research & particularly in support of experimental efforts, development usage of NNIN during 2010‐11. and in building repositories of trusted critical scientific information, e.g., interatomic and pseudopotentials.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials Science and Engineering”
    Materials Oceania 2019: Conference Report International Conference on Materials Science PRISM and Engineering September 16-18, 2019 Event Venue Pullman Melbourne Albert Park 65 Queens Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 Australia Our Supporters Acknowledgements The conference was headed by Prof. Manijeh Razeghi (Northwestern University, USA) and the sessions were governed by Prof. Osama O. Awadelkarim (Pennsylvania State University, USA), Prof. Yoshimine Kato (Kyushu University, Japan), Dr. Barbara Szpunar (University of Saskatchewan, Canada), Prof. Hiromitsu Takaba (Kogakuin University), Dr. Kun Qian (Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China), Dr. Katsumi Yoshida (Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan), Dr. Shalini Bahel (Guru Nanak Dev University, India), Prof. Ivan Nemec (Charles University, Czech Republic), Dr. Frank Czerwinski (CanmetMATERIALS, Canada). The poster session was judged by Prof. Yusuke Yamauchi (The University of Queensland, Australia), Dr. Rajender Varma (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USA) and Prof. C. K. Jayasankar (Sri Venkateswara University, India). Sincerest thanks to Lord Mayor Sally Capp (City of Melbourne) for her inspirational speech and inquisitive participation in the panel discussion on Women in Materials Science along with Prof. Jiazhao Wang (University of Wollongong, Australia), Prof. Manijeh Razeghi (Northwestern University, USA), Prof. Jing Li (Rutgers University, USA). The congregation was generously supported by Across International Australia, Royal Society of Chemistry, Materials Today, Engineers without Borders Australia, Nanotechnology World Network, Innovation Leadership Forum, Medgate Today Magazine, Lanka Lion, Bio Based Press, EIN news and Bus Charter. Revered members of organising committee were: Dr. Huijun Li (University of Wollongong, Australia), Dr. Almantas Pivrikas (Murdoch University, Australia), Dr. Tong Lin (Deakin University, Australia), Dr. Dusan Losic (The University of Adelaide, Australia), Dr.
    [Show full text]