DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of the Interior United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 134 Union Blvd Lakewood, Colorado 80228 In Reply Refer to: FWS/IR05/IR07 TAILS: 06E24000-2019-F-1099 March 19, 2020 Richard Myers Deputy Regional Environmental Officer U.S. Department of Homeland Security, FEMA Region VIII Denver Federal Center, Building 710 P.O. Box 25267 Denver, Colorado 80225-0267 Dear Mr. Myers: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received your request for formal consultation on July 29, 2019, regarding the repair and reconstruction of Larimer County Road (LCR) 44H along Buckhorn Creek in Larimer County, Colorado, which was damaged by severe flooding in September 2013. The project is receiving funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and part of the corridor is on the Arapahoe-Roosevelt National Forest. The purpose of the project is to permanently repair approximately 10 miles of LCR 44H and bring the roadway up to current Larimer County codes and standards to reduce the risk of damage from future flood events. Your letter initiated formal consultation for the federally threatened Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) and determined that the proposed project is likely to adversely affect the species and its designated critical habitat. This letter transmits our biological opinion regarding the proposed project in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the Interagency Cooperative Regulations (50 CFR 402). In this biological opinion, we find that the proposed project may affect the Preble’s mouse and its designated critical habitat, and that the actions carried out pursuant to the proposed project are not expected to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or adversely modify its designated critical habitat. We base this biological opinion on the July 12, 2019, biological assessment and March 3, 2020, addendum, both prepared by Pinyon Environmental, Inc., as well as any additional clarifying correspondence. INTERIOR REGION 5 INTERIOR REGION 7 Missouri Basin Upper Colorado River Basin Kansas, Montana*, Nebraska, North Dakota, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming South Dakota *PARTIAL 2019-F-1099: FEMA, Larimer County Road 44H 2 CONSULTATION HISTORY • In response to the September 2013 flooding, Larimer County conducted emergency repairs on LCR 44H. • Beginning in 2014, Larimer County coordinated site visits and discussions among FEMA, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), the Service, the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM), as well as Pinyon Environmental and AVI Professional Corporation (AVI), the design engineers. • On December 10, 2014, a field visit was conducted to observe and discuss habitat for threatened and endangered species. Representatives from FEMA, the Service, and Larimer County attended. • On February 16, 2016, a meeting to discuss strategies for minimizing impacts was held, with representatives from FEMA, the Service, the USFS, and Larimer County in attendance. • On August 10, 2017, FEMA submitted a biological assessment to initiate formal consultation for the project. The project design included several roadway alignment shifts and larger, upgraded culverts to increase resiliency against future flooding. • On September 20, 2017, a meeting was held among the USFS, FEMA, the Service, and the County to discuss design criteria, mitigation measures, and the section 7 consultation process. At this meeting, we requested additional information that was not included in the biological assessment; therefore, Pinyon began preparing a supplemental biological assessment to include the requested information. • In December 2017, FEMA determined that key elements of the project design (including the roadway alignment shifts and upgraded culverts) were not eligible for federal funding. The project was put on hold as the County re-evaluated funding sources and the project design. • On July 29, 2019, we received your request for formal consultation. • On December 2, 2019, we sent a request for more information regarding the project’s conceptual mitigation plan. We received that information on January 17, 2020. • On February 12, 2020, changes in project impacts and mitigation were discussed on a conference call among FEMA, the Service, Larimer County, and others. Mitigation was further discussed and finalized via email on February 25, 2020. An addendum to the biological assessment was received March 3, 2020. 2019-F-1099: FEMA, Larimer County Road 44H 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSULTATION HISTORY ................................................................................................... 2 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................... 4 1.1. Conservation Measures .................................................................................................... 6 2. ACTION AREA ...................................................................................................................... 7 3. STATUS OF THE PREBLE’S MEADOW JUMPING MOUSE ........................................... 8 3.1. Taxonomy ......................................................................................................................... 8 3.2. Physical Description ......................................................................................................... 9 3.3. Preble’s meadow jumping mouse Life History ................................................................ 9 3.4. Preble’s Abundance and Trends ..................................................................................... 12 3.5. Preble’s Status and Distribution ..................................................................................... 13 3.6. Threats to the Preble’s Mouse ........................................................................................ 15 3.7. Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse Critical Habitat ....................................................... 18 4. ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ........................................................................................ 20 4.1. Status of the Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse within the Action Areas ..................... 22 4.2. Regulatory Actions under the ESA Completed by the Service for the Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse ......................................................................................................................... 22 4.3. Status of the Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse Critical Habitat within the Action Area 24 5. EFFECTS OF THE ACTION ............................................................................................... 24 5.1. Effects to the Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse ........................................................... 25 5.2. Effects to Critical Habitat ............................................................................................... 25 5.3. Cumulative Effects ......................................................................................................... 26 6. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 26 INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT .......................................................................................... 27 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 27 2. AMOUNT OR EXTENT OF TAKE ..................................................................................... 28 2.1. Reasonable and Prudent Measures ................................................................................. 28 2.2. Terms and Conditions .................................................................................................... 28 3. CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 29 4. REINITIATION NOTICE ..................................................................................................... 29 REFERENCES CITED ................................................................................................................. 31 2019-F-1099: FEMA, Larimer County Road 44H 4 BIOLOGICAL OPINION 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION The project corridor spans 10.1 miles westward along LCR 44H from its intersection with LCR 27. Approximately 7.5 miles of the project corridor is within habitat for the Preble’s mouse, all of which is designated critical habitat. The purpose of the project is to permanently repair the roadway to its pre-flood condition, install larger culverts to reduce the risk of additional damage from future flooding events, and improve environmental conditions. Damage incurred from the 2013 flood included the removal of the existing roadway, removal or severe damage to existing drainage culverts, relocation of the Buckhorn Creek channel, removal of roadway armoring, removal of roadway surfacing, and severe slope erosion. Reconstruction includes replacing or improving roadway embankment, roadway surfacing, drainage structures at six locations, minor bank armoring, and revegetation. Construction is expected to begin in late summer/fall 2020 and last until late fall 2022 or early 2023, and will occur during daylight hours only. Staging areas for temporary storage of equipment and materials during construction will be mostly located on previously disturbed ground. Approximately 7.8 miles of roadway will be reconstructed by raising it to pre-flood elevations using imported
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species Status Assessment Report New Mexico Meadow Jumping Mouse (Zapus Hudsonius Luteus)
    Species Status Assessment Report New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) (photo courtesy of J. Frey) Prepared by the Listing Review Team U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico May 27, 2014 New Mexico Meadow Jumping Mouse SSA May 27, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) (jumping mouse) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and, conversely, extinction risk. The jumping mouse is a small mammal whose historical distribution likely included riparian areas and wetlands along streams in the Sangre de Cristo and San Juan Mountains from southern Colorado to central New Mexico, including the Jemez and Sacramento Mountains and the Rio Grande Valley from Española to Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, and into parts of the White Mountains in eastern Arizona. In conducting our status assessment we first considered what the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse needs to ensure viability. We generally define viability as the ability of the species to persist over the long-term and, conversely, to avoid extinction. We next evaluated whether the identified needs of the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse are currently available and the repercussions to the subspecies when provision of those needs are missing or diminished. We then consider the factors that are causing the species to lack what it needs, including historical, current, and future factors. Finally, considering the information reviewed, we evaluate the current status and future viability of the species in terms of resiliency, redundancy, and representation.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File Containing Table of Lengths and Thicknesses of Turtle Shells And
    Source Species Common name length (cm) thickness (cm) L t TURTLES AMNH 1 Sternotherus odoratus common musk turtle 2.30 0.089 AMNH 2 Clemmys muhlenbergi bug turtle 3.80 0.069 AMNH 3 Chersina angulata Angulate tortoise 3.90 0.050 AMNH 4 Testudo carbonera 6.97 0.130 AMNH 5 Sternotherus oderatus 6.99 0.160 AMNH 6 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 7 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 8 Homopus areolatus Common padloper 7.95 0.100 AMNH 9 Homopus signatus Speckled tortoise 7.98 0.231 AMNH 10 Kinosternon subrabum steinochneri Florida mud turtle 8.90 0.178 AMNH 11 Sternotherus oderatus Common musk turtle 8.98 0.290 AMNH 12 Chelydra serpentina Snapping turtle 8.98 0.076 AMNH 13 Sternotherus oderatus 9.00 0.168 AMNH 14 Hardella thurgi Crowned River Turtle 9.04 0.263 AMNH 15 Clemmys muhlenbergii Bog turtle 9.09 0.231 AMNH 16 Kinosternon subrubrum The Eastern Mud Turtle 9.10 0.253 AMNH 17 Kinixys crosa hinged-back tortoise 9.34 0.160 AMNH 18 Peamobates oculifers 10.17 0.140 AMNH 19 Peammobates oculifera 10.27 0.140 AMNH 20 Kinixys spekii Speke's hinged tortoise 10.30 0.201 AMNH 21 Terrapene ornata ornate box turtle 10.30 0.406 AMNH 22 Terrapene ornata North American box turtle 10.76 0.257 AMNH 23 Geochelone radiata radiated tortoise (Madagascar) 10.80 0.155 AMNH 24 Malaclemys terrapin diamondback terrapin 11.40 0.295 AMNH 25 Malaclemys terrapin Diamondback terrapin 11.58 0.264 AMNH 26 Terrapene carolina eastern box turtle 11.80 0.259 AMNH 27 Chrysemys picta Painted turtle 12.21 0.267 AMNH 28 Chrysemys picta painted turtle 12.70 0.168 AMNH 29
    [Show full text]
  • Zapus Hudsonius Luteus) Jennifer K
    Variation in phenology of hibernation and reproduction in the endangered New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) Jennifer K. Frey Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America Frey Biological Research, Radium Springs, NM, United States of America ABSTRACT Hibernation is a key life history feature that can impact many other crucial aspects of a species’ biology, such as its survival and reproduction. I examined the timing of hibernation and reproduction in the federally endangered New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus), which occurs across a broad range of latitudes and elevations in the American Southwest. Data from museum specimens and field studies supported predictions for later emergence and shorter active intervals in montane populations relative to lower elevation valley populations. A low-elevation population located at Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge (BANWR) in the Rio Grande valley was most similar to other subspecies of Z. hudsonius: the first emergence date was in mid-May and there was an active interval of 162 days. In montane populations of Z. h. luteus, the date of first emergence was delayed until mid-June and the active interval was reduced to ca 124–135 days, similar to some populations of the western jumping mouse (Z. princeps). Last date of immergence into hibernation occurred at about the same time in all populations (mid to late October). In montane populations pregnant females are known from July to late August and evidence suggests that they have a single litter per year. At BANWR two peaks in reproduction were expected based Submitted 6 May 2015 on similarity of active season to Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Diets and Foraging Behavior of Northern Spotted Owls in Oregon
    The Journal of Raptor Research Volume 38 Number3 September2004 *.-. d--- , - \\Ci . / * - -- ",, Published by , . i r, ' .,.. :J' The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. ,+-, ,+-, .$"<; , , . , , 3% I -1 * * ,, THE RAPTOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. (FOUNDED1966) http:/biology. boisestate.edu/raptor/ OFFICERS PRESIDENT: BwA. MILLSAP SECRETARY:JUDITH HENCKEL VICEPRESIDENT: DAVIDM. BIRD TREASURER: JIMFITZPATRICK BOARD OF DIRECTORS NORTH AMERICAN DIRECTOR #1: INTERNATIONAL DIRECTOR #3: JEFFSMITH STEVEREDPATH NORTH AMERICAN DIRECTOR #2: DIRECTOR AT LARGE #1: JEMIMA PARRY~ONES GARYSANTOLO DIRECTOR AT LARGE #2: EDWARDOINIGO-ELLAS NORTH AMERICAN DIRECTOR #3: DIRECTOR AT LARGE #3: MICHAELW. COLLOW TEDSWEM DIRECTOR AT LARGE #4: CAROLMcIm INTERNATIONAL DIRECTOR #1: DIRECTOR AT LARGE #5: JOHNA. SMALLWOOD BEATRIZARROYO DIRECTOR AT LARGE #6: DANIELE. VARLAND INTERNATIONAL DIRECTOR #2: RUTHTINGAY .................... EDITORIAL STAFF EDITOR: JAMESC. BEDNARZ,Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 599, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467 U.S.A. ASSOCIATE EDITORS JAMES R. BELTHOFF JUANJOSENEGRO CLINTW. BOAL MARco RESTANI CHERYLR. DIXSTRA FABRIZIOSERGIO MICHAELI. GOLDSTEIN IAN G. WARKENTIN JOAN L. MORRISON JAMESW. WATSON BOOK REVIEW EDITOR: JEFFREYS. IMARKS, Montana Cooperative Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 U.S.A. SPANISH EDITOR: CisAR h4k~mzREYES, Instituto Humboldt, Colombia, AA. 094766, Bogoti 8, Colombia EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS: JENNIFER L. NORRIS,JOAN CLARK The Journal of Ruptor Research is distributed quarterly to all current members. Original manuscripts dealing with the biology and conservation of diurnal and nocturnal birds of prey are welcomed from throughout the world, but must be written in English. Submissions can be in the form of research articles, short communications, letters to the editor, and book reviews. Contributors should submit a typewritten original and three copies to the Editor.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Value of Dihydrogen Monoxide to a Jumping Mouse: Habitat Use
    The value of dihydrogen monoxide to a jumping mouse: habitat use and preference in Zapus princeps. Student: Jennifer B. Smith Mentor: Rosemary J. Smith Advanced Independent Research/REU Summer 2012 1 ABSTRACT The western jumping mouse, Zapus princeps is common in riparian habitat. There are multiple hypotheses (need for water, food type, or anti-predator/cover) for why this is. The objective of this project was to determine the use of mesic and adjacent drier habitats by Zapus using both a live-trapping study and a historical study using records of Zapus captures at three sites in the East River Valley, Gunnison, CO. I also conducted a test to determine if the presence of water vs. cover had a greater influence on Zapus habitat selection. I live-trapped individuals of Z. princeps in three different habitats: riparian, intermediate, and dry, replicated at three sites. I marked the mice uniquely to indicate the habitat in which they were first trapped. This allowed me to study frequency of recaptures both within and among habitat types. I also compared trapping success between two different microhabitats (wet/cover vs. dry/cover). The third study used historical trapping records on permanent grids to determine long-term patterns of Zapus captures with vegetation and proximity to water. Zapus princeps was captured more frequently in riparian areas. Zapus preferred to move within and between wetter habitats than the dry. The historical study showed a negative relationship between trap success and distance from water. The microhabitat experiment showed a trend but no overall significant difference in capture of mice between microhabitats of wet/cover and dry/cover.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review and the Conservation Implications of Aquatic Behaviour and Drowning in Jumping Mice (Dipodidae: Zapodinae)
    Note A Review and the Conservation Implications of Aquatic Behaviour and Drowning in Jumping Mice (Dipodidae: Zapodinae) JENNIFER K. F REY Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003 USA; email: [email protected] Frey, Jennifer K. 2017. A review and the conservation implications of aquatic behaviour and drowning in jumping mice (Dipodidae: Zapodinae). Canadian Field-Naturalist 131(2): 141–143. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v131i2.1869 Jumping mice (Dipodidae: Zapodinae) have a generalized terrestrial quadrupedal locomotion with specializations for saltatory and scansorial locomotion. I reviewed first-hand accounts of aquatic behaviour in the literature and confirmed that jumping mice are semi-aquatic, using both primitive quadrupedal paddling on the surface as well as the more derived simultaneous bipedal pelvic paddling while swimming underwater. Although proficient swimmers, jumping mice are also prone to drowning, especially in human-made pools. Management of populations of jumping mice with conservation concern should consider potential hazards faced by jumping mice in an aquatic environment. Key Words: Endangered species; jumping mouse; Eozapus ; Zapus ; Napaeozapus ; pitfall trap Introduction mice have been assessed by the Committee on the Sta - The jumping mice (Dipodidae: Zapodinae) include tus of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (SARA Public four North American species, Meadow Jumping Mouse Registry 2017), it is important to understand more clear - (Zapus hudsonius
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Nederlandse Namen Van De Overige Knaagdieren, Waaronder Alle Muizen
    Blad1 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P 1 Klasse Orde Suborde Superfamilie Familie Subfamilie Tak Geslacht Soort Ondersoort Betekenis Engels Frans Duits Spaans Nederlands 2 Mammalia met melkklier Mammals Mammifères Säugetiere Mamiféros Zoogdieren 3 Rodentia knagers Rodents Rongeurs Nagetiere Roedores Knaagdieren 4 Myomorpha muis + vorm Mouse-like rodents Myomorphs Mauseverwandten Miomorfos Muisachtigen 5 Dipodoidea tweepoot + idea Jerboa-like rodents Berken-, Huppel- & Springmuizen 6 Sminthidae Grieks sminthos = muis + idae Birch mice Berkenmuizen 7 Sicista Berkenmuizen 8 S. caudata met staart Long-tailed birch mouseSiciste à longue queue Langschwanzbirkenmaus Ratón listado de cola largo Langstaartberkenmuis 9 S. concolor eenkleurig Chinese birch mouse Siciste de Chine China-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de China Chinese berkenmuis 10 S.c. concolor eenkleurig Gansu birch mouse Gansuberkenmuis 11 S.c. leathemi Leathem ??? Kashmir birch mouse Kasjmirberkenmuis 12 S.c. weigoldi Hugo Weigold Sichuan birch mouse Sichuanberkenmuis 13 S. tianshanica Tiensjangebergte, Azië Tian Shan birch mouse Siciste du Tian Shan Tienschan-BirkenmausRatón listado de Tien Shan Tiensjanberkenmuis 14 S. caucasica Kaukassisch Caucasian birch mouse Siciste du Caucase Kaukasus-BirkenmausRatón listado del Cáucaso Kaukasusberkenmuis 15 S. kluchorica Klukhorrivier, Kaukasus Kluchor birch mouse Siciste du Klukhor Kluchor-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Kluchor Klukhorberkenmuis 16 S. kazbegica Kazbegi-district, Georgië Kazbeg birch mouse Siciste du Kazbegi Kazbeg-BirkenmausRatón listado de Kazbegi Kazbekberkenmuis 17 S. armenica Armeens Armenian birch mouseSiciste d'Arménie Armenien-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Armenia Armeense berkenmuis 18 S. napaea een weidenimf Altai birch mouseSiciste de l'Altaï Nördliche Altai-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Altái Altaiberkenmuis 19 S.n.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertebrates of British Columbia: Scientific and English Names
    The Vertebrates of British Columbia: Scientific and English Names Standards for Components of British Columbia's Biodiversity No. 2 Prepared by Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management Terrestrial Information Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force Resources Inventory Committee Year 2002 Version 3.0 © The Province of British Columbia Published by the Resources Inventory Committee National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: The vertebrates of British Columbia [electronic resource] -- Version 3.0 (Standards for components of British Columbia’s biodiversity ; no. 2) Previously issued by Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Resources Inventory Branch. Issued also in printed format on demand. Available through the Internet. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-4687-2 1. Vertebrates - British Columbia - Nomenclature. 2. Vertebrates - Nomenclature. I. British Columbia. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management. Terrestrial Information Branch. II. Resources Inventory Committee (Canada). Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force. III. British Columbia. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. Resources Inventory Branch. IV. Series. QL606.52.C3V47 2002 596'.09711 C2002-960000-6 Additional Copies of this publication can be purchased from: Government Publication Services Phone: (250) 387-6409 or Toll free: 1-800-663-6105 Fax: (250) 387-1120 www.publications.gov.bc.ca Digital Copies are available on the Internet at: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/ric ii Preface This version of The Vertebrates of British Columbia: Scientific and Common Names contains current lists as of September 2001 of the scientific and common names for the vertebrates of British Columbia, as well as scientific names for subspecies. These lists are intended to reach a wide readership and to stimulate co-operation among those interested in British Columbia's biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vertebrate Animals of the Cascade Head Experimental Forest. USDA For
    Chris Maser is Associate Curator of Mammals, Puget Sound Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington, and Jerry F. Franklin is Chief Plant Ecologist, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Corvallis, Oregon. ABSTRACT Three months, April and August 1971 and August 1972, were spent studying the vertebrate fauna of Cascade Head Experimental Forest. The resulting annotated checklist includes 9 amphibians, 2 reptiles, 35 birds, and 40 mammals. A standardized animal habitat classification is presented in an effort to correlate the vertebrates in some meaningful way to their environment. Keywords: Vertebrates, Cascade Head Experimental Forest. Cascade Head ~x~edimentalForest is a facility established by the U.S. Forest Service for research on the distinctive and very productive coastal "fogbelt" Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophy ZZa) forests of Oregon and Washington. Since its estab- lishment in 1934, this 4,750-hectare (11,890-acre) tract has been jointly administered by the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station and Siuslaw National Forest as a site for basic biological research, experimentation in various forest management practices, and education. Accumulating information makes Cascade Head increasingly valuable as a resource for scientists and educators concerned with coastal forests. Chris and Rita Maser spent 3 months (April 1971, August 1971, and August 1972) studying the fauna of the Experimental Forest as part of a larger study of the natural history of the entire Oregon coast. Data were collected 'on the abundance of various animals and their habitat preferences and food habits. This checklist has been developed from those data plus some addi- tional research on correlation of animal distributions with major plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • IB 104 Lab Manual 2021
    VERTEBRATE NATURAL HISTORY LABORATORY AND FIELD SYLLABUS INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY 104LF Rauri C. K. Bowie, Jimmy A. McGuire, Andrew Rush, & Alan B. Shabel This manual for Integrative Biology 104L is based in part on material contained in earlier versions prepared by Seth B. Benson, Ned K. Johnson, William Z. Lidicker, Meredith J. Mahoney, Alden H. Miller, James L. Patton, Oliver P. Pearson, and Robert C. Stebbins. We are indebted also to numerous other staff colleagues, associates, and graduate student instructors for the improvements they have suggested over the many years this course has been offered. University of California, Berkeley (Revised January 2021) Table of Contents Introduction 3 Materials 5 Instructions of use of laboratory specimens 6 Maps 7 Laboratory exercises on birds 12 Total species list for bird labs 20 Birds of the San Francisco Bay Area: natural history notes 28 Vertebrate vocalizations 46 Laboratory exercises on amphibians 55 Laboratory I 56 Amphibians of California: natural history notes 57 Laboratory II 62 Key to amphibians 68 Laboratory exercises on mammals 75 Major features of the mammalian skull 77 List of local mammal species 82 Mammals: natural history notes 86 Laboratory exercises on reptiles 103 Laboratory I 103 Laboratory II 109 Laboratory III 113 Notes on field notes 118 Field project proposal guidelines 129 FIELD BIOLOGY OF THE VERTEBRATES Integrative Biology 104L Introduction The primary objective of the laboratory and field work in this course is to aid the student in making personal, first-hand observations on the biology of living vertebrate animals in their natural environments. Semi-wild and wild lands in local Regional Parks (e.g., Briones, Coyote Hills, Sunol, Pt.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodentia Knagers Rodents Rongeurs Nagetiere Roedores Knaagdieren
    Blad1 ABCDEFGHIJK L M N O P Q 2 Mammalia met melkklier Mammals Mammifères Säugetiere Mamiféros Zoogdieren 3 Rodentia knagers Rodents Rongeurs Nagetiere Roedores Knaagdieren 4 Myomorpha muis + vorm Mouse-like rodents Myomorphs Mauseverwandten Miomorfos Muisachtigen 5 Dipodoidea tweepoot + idea Jerboa-like rodents Berken-, Huppel- & Springmuizen 6 Sminthidae Grieks sminthos = muis + idae Birch mice Berkenmuizen 7 Sicista Berkenmuizen 8 S. caudata met staart Long-tailed birch mouse Siciste à longue queue Langschwanzbirkenmaus Ratón listado de cola largo Langstaartberkenmuis 9 S. concolor eenkleurig Chinese birch mouse Siciste de Chine China-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de China Chinese berkenmuis 10 S.c. concolor eenkleurig Gansu birch mouse Gansuberkenmuis 11 S.c. leathemi Leathem ??? Kashmir birch mouse Kasjmirberkenmuis 12 S.c. weigoldi Hugo Weigold Sichuan birch mouse Sichuanberkenmuis 13 S. tianshanica Tiensjangebergte, Azië Tian Shan birch mouse Siciste du Tian Shan Tienschan-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Tien Shan Tiensjanberkenmuis 14 S. caucasica Kaukassisch Caucasian birch mouse Siciste du Caucase Kaukasus-Birkenmaus Ratón listado del Cáucaso Kaukasusberkenmuis 15 S. kluchorica Klukhorrivier, Kaukasus Kluchor birch mouse Siciste du Klukhor Kluchor-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Kluchor Klukhorberkenmuis 16 S. kazbegica Kazbegi-district, Georgië Kazbeg birch mouse Siciste du Kazbegi Kazbeg-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Kazbegi Kazbekberkenmuis 17 S. armenica Armeens Armenian birch mouse Siciste d'Arménie Armenien-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Armenia Armeense berkenmuis 18 S. napaea een weidenimf Altai birch mouse Siciste de l'Altaï Nördliche Altai-Birkenmaus Ratón listado de Altái Altaiberkenmuis 19 S.n. napaea weidenimf West-Altaiberkenmuis 20 S.n. tschingistauca Tsjingiz-Tau-bergen, Kazachstan Kazachberkenmuis 21 S. pseudonapaea lijkend op napaea Gray birch mouse Siciste grise Südliche Altai-Birkenmaus Ratón listado gris Grijze berkenmuis 22 S.
    [Show full text]