DOCSLIB.ORG

ANSI UASSC Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems – V2 Page 3 of 410

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANSI UASSC Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems – V2 Page 3 of 410 STANDARDIZATION ROADMAP For Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 2.0 Prepared by the ANSI Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization Collaborative (UASSC): June 2020 ©2020 American National Standards Institute (ANSI). All rights reserved. Published by ANSI. Printed in the United States of America. Limited License: This material may be copied without permission from ANSI only for non- commercial and non-promotional purposes and if and to the extent that text is not altered or deleted in any fashion and the ANSI copyright is clearly noted as set forth immediately above. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, except as permitted by the Limited License or under Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act, without prior written permission of the publisher. Material in this publication is for educational purposes. Neither the publisher nor the authors assume any liability for any errors or omissions or for how this publication or its contents are used or interpreted or for any consequences resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this publication. For legal or other advice, please consult your personal lawyer or the appropriate professional. The views expressed by the individuals in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views shared by the companies they are employed by (or the companies mentioned in this publication). The employment status and affiliations of authors with the companies referenced are subject to change. Table of Contents Table of Contents …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Summary of Major Changes from Version 1.0 ………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Breakdown of the High, Medium, and Low Priority Open Gaps …………………………………………………………27 Summary Table of Gaps and Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………….… 31 1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 57 1.1. Situational Assessment for UAS ....................................................................................... 57 1.2. Roadmap Background, Objectives, and Audience ............................................................. 58 1.3. Roadmap Structure ......................................................................................................... 60 1.4. Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 62 2. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and International Cooperation 65 2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 65 2.2. Rules and Measures to Enable UAS Operations and Integration into the NAS.................... 65 2.3. International Outreach and Engagement ......................................................................... 66 2.3.1. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) ............................................................... 66 2.3.2. Joint Authorities for Rulemaking on Unmanned Systems (JARUS) ..................................... 67 3. Overviews of Other Selected U.S. Federal Government Agency Activities and Intergovernmental Cooperation …………………………………………………………………………………….. 69 3.1. Department of Defense (DOD) ......................................................................................... 69 3.1.1. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ...................................................................... 70 3.2. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ......................................................................... 71 3.3. Department of the Interior (DOI) ..................................................................................... 72 3.4. International Trade Administration (ITA) ......................................................................... 73 3.5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) ................................................... 74 3.6. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) ......................................... 80 3.7. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ..................................................... 81 3.8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) .............................................. 83 3.9. USDA Forest Service ........................................................................................................ 84 ANSI UASSC Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems – V2 Page 3 of 410 4. Overviews of Private-Sector Standards Development Organization Activities ………………….87 4.1. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) ....................................................................... 87 4.2. Airborne Public Safety Accreditation Commission (APSAC) ............................................... 88 4.3. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) .......................................................... 89 4.4. American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP) .............................................................. 90 4.5. ASTM International (ASTM) ............................................................................................. 90 4.6. Consumer Technology Association (CTA) .......................................................................... 94 4.7. European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment (EUROCAE) ...................................... 94 4.8. Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ..................................................... 98 4.9. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ...................................................... 102 4.10. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) ........................................................................... 104 4.11. NACE International (NACE) ............................................................................................ 106 4.12. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) ................................................................... 107 4.13. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) ............................................................................... 107 4.14. RTCA, Inc. (RTCA) .......................................................................................................... 109 4.15. SAE International (SAE) ................................................................................................. 111 4.16. SAE Industry Technologies Consortia (SAE ITC) ............................................................... 116 4.17. Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) ............................................................. 120 4.18. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL) .............................................................................. 121 5. Overviews of Selected UAS Industry Stakeholder Activities 123 5.1. Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) .......................................................................... 123 5.2. Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) .......................................................................... 124 5.3. Alliance for Drone Innovation (ADI) ............................................................................... 124 5.4. Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) ............................................. 125 5.5. Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI).................................. 126 5.6. Aviators Code Initiative (ACI) ......................................................................................... 127 5.7. AW-Drones ................................................................................................................... 128 5.8. Commercial Drone Alliance ........................................................................................... 132 5.9. CTIA .............................................................................................................................. 132 5.10. General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA) .................................................... 133 5.11. Global UTM Association (GUTMA) ................................................................................. 135 5.12. Helicopter Association International (HAI) ..................................................................... 136 ANSI UASSC Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems – V2 Page 4 of 410 5.13. National Agricultural Aviation Association (NAAA) ......................................................... 137 5.14. National Council on Public Safety UAS (NCPSU) .............................................................. 138 5.15. National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) .......................................... 139 5.16. Performance Review Institute® (PRI) ............................................................................. 140 5.17. Security Industry Association (SIA) ................................................................................. 142 5.18. Small UAV Coalition ...................................................................................................... 143 5.19. Vertical Flight Society (VFS) ........................................................................................... 144 6. Airworthiness Standards – WG1 …………………………………………………………………………………… 145 6.1. Design and Construction ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before You Continue
    NASA/CR–2015-218982 Application of SAE ARP4754A to Flight Critical Systems Eric M. Peterson Electron International II, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona November 2015 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. advancement of aeronautics and space science. The Collected papers from scientific and technical NASA scientific and technical information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the auspices SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It collects, technical, or historical information from NASA organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates programs, projects, and missions, often NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access concerned with subjects having substantial to the NTRS Registered and its public interface, the public interest. NASA Technical Reports Server, thus providing one of the largest collections of aeronautical and space TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. science STI in the world. Results are published in both English-language translations of foreign non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI scientific and technical material pertinent to Report Series, which includes the following report NASA’s mission. types: Specialized services also include organizing TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of and publishing research results, distributing completed research or a major significant phase of specialized research announcements and feeds, research that present the results of NASA providing information desk and personal search Programs and include extensive data or theoretical support, and enabling data exchange services. analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and technical data and information For more information about the NASA STI program, deemed to be of continuing reference value.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance, Process Engineer
    THOMMEN AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT Renowned Swiss manufacturer of high precision Aviation Instruments, Air Data Computers, Digital Chronometers and Mission Equipment Established in 1853 under Revue Thommen AG, Thommen Aircraft Equipment Ltd is a renowned Swiss manufacturer of high precision aviation instruments, avionics and mission equipment. The company has celebrated its 100 years anniversary of supplying aviation products to its customers. Thommen Aircraft Equipment AG is currently in the phase of introducing several innovative and exciting products to the market and will gradually increase the general product offering in the course of 2018/2019. To sustain the new company plans, product development, we are looking to hire a skilled and experienced Quality Assurance / Process Engineer – Avionics 100% (m/f) The person will be responsible for leading activities involving Product Lifecycle Management processes. Focused on improving processes and tools, the position is ideal for a candidate seeking a broad technical and business process career. The position offers the opportunity to work as part of a global team which will require flexibility to support activities across multiple time zones for following process development activities. Our culture is to hire only the finest talent and to uphold our values of teamwork, accountability, humor, efficiency, candor and continual improvement. Responsibilities & Tasks • Develop DO-178C and DO-254 process compliance and quality plan, (QAP, SQAP HQAP) • Responsible for reporting assessment and evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • Annuaire Directory
    ANNUAIRE DIRECTORY MOBILISATION. CROISSANCE. RAYONNEMENT. MOT DE LA PRÉSIDENTE-DIRECTRICE GÉNÉRALE PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Aéro Montréal fête en 2016 ses 10 ans. Tout au long de Aéro Montréal is celebrating its 10th anniversary in 2016. cette décennie, nous avons poursuivi sans relâche et avec Throughout this past decade, we have relentlessly and passion notre mission de mobiliser la grappe aérospatiale passionately pursued our mission to mobilize Québec’s du Québec en vue de soutenir sa croissance et son aerospace cluster and support its growth and influence on rayonnement sur la scène mondiale. Dans un tel contexte, the world stage. In this context, the publication of the fourth edition of the directory of Québec’s aerospace cluster is la publication de la quatrième édition de l’annuaire de la especially significant. grappe aérospatiale du Québec prend une signification tout particulière. We are very proud to offer this reference tool to our members and partners, as well as industry players Nous sommes très fiers de présenter cet outil de référence worldwide. It enables everyone to learn about the strengths à nos membres et à nos partenaires, ainsi qu’aux acteurs de of our ecosystem, which has been developed over nearly l’industrie à l’échelle mondiale. Il permet de faire connaître a decade. This ecosystem makes the Québec aerospace à tous la force de notre écosystème bâti depuis près d’un industry a world leader and a key driver of the Québec and siècle et qui fait de l’industrie aérospatiale québécoise Canadian economy. un des leaders mondiaux et un des Benefiting from the presence of fleurons de l’économie du Québec world leaders, the Québec aerospace et du Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Assurance Approaches, Considerations, and Limitations
    DOT/FAA/TC-15/57 Software Assurance Approaches, Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Considerations, and Limitations: Aviation Research Division Atlantic City International Airport Final Report New Jersey 08405 October 2016 Final Report This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Services (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161. This document is also available from the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center at actlibrary.tc.faa.gov. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agency. This document does not constitute FAA policy. Consult the FAA sponsoring organization listed on the Technical Documentation page as to its use. This report is available at the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center’s Full-Text Technical Reports page: actlibrary.tc.faa.gov in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF). Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/TC-15/57 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date SOFTWARE ASSURANCE APPROACHES, CONSIDERATIONS, AND LIMITATIONS FINAL REPORT October 2016 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Standard
    AEROSPACE AS5498 STANDARD Issued 2001-10 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 Minimum Operational Performance Specification for Inflight Icing Detection Systems FOREWORD 1. The development of these guidelines was jointly accomplished by EUROCAE Working Group 54 and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) AC-9C through a consensus process. It was accepted by the Council of EUROCAE on June 2001 and SAE on September 2001. 2. SAE, Inc. and EUROCAE are, respectively, US and international not-for-profit making organizations, formed to advance the art and science of aviation and aviation electronic systems for the benefit of the public. 3. Since SAE or EUROCAE are not official agencies of any US or European government, their recommendations may not be regarded as statements of official government policy unless so enunciated by the appropriate government organization, conference of governments, or agency having statutory jurisdiction over any matters to which the recommendations relate. SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user.” SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be reaffirmed, revised, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions. Copyright 2001 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER: (724) 776-4970 FAX: (724) 776-0790 SAE WEB ADDRESS: http://www.sae.org SAE AS5498 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Process Model for the Development of Airborne Electronic Equipment
    A Process Model for the Development of Airborne Electronic Equipment A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL FOR COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING NORTH-WEST UNIVERSITY POTCHEFSTROOM CAMPUS As part of the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Ingeneriae in Computer and Electronic Engineering by D.A. Viljoen supervised by Prof. J.E.W. (Johann) Holm November 2008 Acknowledgements The author wishes to acknowledge contributions in terms of understanding and refining concepts described in this dissertation from the following persons: from Denel Aviation, messrs. Abhi Raghu, Andrew Douglas, Andries Jansen Van Rensburg, Anton Jacobs, Bernhard Meier, Chris Versluis, Danie Dreyer, Dewald Steyn, Dougie Lawson, Garth Tolmie, Jan van Niekerk, Johan (JC) Botha, Johan Zietsman, Jorge Pinto, Jimmy Nel, Justin Shulman, Kevin Ward, Kobus Pieters, Luke Sibisi, Nic du Plessis, Phil Smalman, Philip van Rooyen, Pieter Gerber, and Pieter Booyse; from Saab AB (Sweden), messrs. Carl Stocklassa, Rikard Johanssen, Lars-Olof Ohberg, Kjell Alm, and Anders Petterson; from Armscor, Mr Andre Kok and Mrs Madalein Young and from the South African Air Force, Mr. Philip Nell, Lt Col Hannes Oosthuizen and Lt Col Willie Möller. Other mentors with whom I have had the privilege to discuss topics addressed in this study are Dr Jerry Lake, Prof Johann Kruger, and Prof Ad Sparrius. I am indebted to my study leader, Prof Johann Holm for his guidance, enthusiasm, patience and motivation. And finally, thank you to my wife Thelma and my family for their support in more ways that can be listed here. ii Summary Developments in systems engineering concepts and in the regulatory environment necessitated improvements to the processes used by Denel Aviation for the development of electronic equipment and software for use on board aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Assessment Processes of ARP4761: Major Revision
    Safety Assessment Processes of ARP4761: Major Revision Jim Marko Manager, Aircraft Integration & Safety Assessment 14 November 2018 Presentation Outline • What is changing • ARP4761 Relationship to ARP4754A Development Assurance • New methods • Changes to existing methods • Safety methods other than ARP4761A 14 November 2018 2 ARP4761A Safety Assessment Process What’s happening to ARP 4761? • Revision commenced in early 2012 within the SAE S18 Aircraft & Systems Development and Safety Assessment Committee. • Essentially a near complete revision of the document that is nearing publication. • New processes and analytical methods being added to reflect the trend towards more highly integrated and increasingly complex system designs. • Introduces the concept of Aircraft-Level safety assessment to complement the traditional system-level safety assessment approach. 14 November 2018 3 Current ARP 4761 Rev- New Appendices for ARP 4761 Other Appendices Rev A Developments Functional Hazard Aircraft Functional Hazard Assessment Single Event Effects Assessment AIR 6218 Preliminary System Safety Preliminary Aircraft Safety Assessment Assessment System Functional Hazard Assessment In-Service Safety System Safety Assessment Aircraft Safety Assessment Assessment ARP 5150/5151 FTA, DD, FMEA, Markov Cascading Effects Analysis Common Mode Analysis Development Assurance Assignment Particular Risk Analysis Model Based Safety Assessment Zonal Safety Analysis Contiguous Example Contiguous Example 14 November 2018 4 ARP4761A Safety Assessment Process Interactions ARP 4754A Development Assurance Processes 14 November 2018 5 ARP4761 Relationship to ARP4754A Development Assurance • Modern aircraft architecture is increasingly becoming a “system-of-systems”, where many systems interact with and are dependent upon each other to perform aircraft functional objectives. • The era of having federated systems that can be correctly and completely assessed in silos, independent from other systems, is rapidly closing.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of DO-178C
    Table of Contents Overview of Section 450.141 ................................................................................2 Overview of Section AC 450.141-1 ........................................................................2 Overview of DO-178C ............................................................................................3 Implementing AC 450.141-1 Using DO-178C.........................................................4 Identification of Computing System Safety Items ................................................... 5 Levels of Criticality ........................................................................................................... 7 Safety Requirements ................................................................................................ 9 Development Processes ........................................................................................ 12 Application Materials ............................................................................................. 21 AC 450.141-1 Process Summary ........................................................................ 22 References ......................................................................................................... 23 List of Tables Table 1 Identification of Computing System Safety Items ......................................... 6 Table 2 Levels of Criticality .......................................................................................... 7 Table 3 Safety Requirements ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Course Material on Maintenance Engineering by Mr. ERSIVAKUMAR
    A Course Material on Maintenance Engineering By Mr. E.R.SIVAKUMAR.M.E,(Ph.D), HEAD & ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SASURIE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING VIJAYAMANGALAM – 638 056 QUALITY CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the e-course material Subject Code : ME2037 Scubject : Maintenance Engineering Class : IV Year being prepared by me and it meets the knowledge requirement of the university curriculum. Signature of the Author Name: Mr.E.R.SIVAKUMAR.M.E,(Ph.D) Designation: This is to certify that the course material being prepared by Mr.E.R.Sivakumar M.E,(Ph.D) is of adequate quality. He has referred more than five books among them minimum one is from abroad author. Signature of HD Name:Mr.E.R.SIVAKUMAR.M.E,(Ph.D), SEAL CONTENTS SL. PAGE TOPICS NO. NO. SYLLABUS UNIT – I PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF MAINTENANCE PLANNING 1.1 Maintenance Engineering 1 1.1.1.Introduction 1 1.1.2. Maintenance Manager 2 1.1.3.Maintenance Engineering Jobs 2 1.1.4.Definition of Maintenance 2 1.1.5.Purpose of Maintenance 2 1.1.6.Principle Objectives in Maintenance 2 1.1.7.Problems in Maintenance 2 1.2 Basic Principles of maintenance planning 3 1.2.1.Maintenance Planning 3 1.2.2. Planning Objectives 3 1.2.3. Planning Procedures 3 1.2.4.Basic Levels of Planning Process (Depend on The Planning 4 Horizon) 1.2.4.1.Long Range Planning 4 1.2.4.2. Medium-Range Planning 4 1.2.4.3. Short-Range Planning 4 1.3 Objectives and Principles of Planned Maintenance Activity 4 1.4 Importance and benefits of sound Maintenance systems 5 1.5 1.5.1.Maintenance organization 5 1.5.2.Maintenance Organization Objectives and Responsibility 5 1.5.3.Determinants of a Maintenance Organization 6 1.5.4.Maintenance Capacity Planning 6 1.5.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Intro to ARP4754A 140723
    Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems Introduction to ARP4754A 23 July, 2014 Avionics Systems Evolution • Early Aviation: mainly mechanical equipment • 1960’s: increased electronic controls • 1970’s: analog equipment supported by low level, simple software DO-178 • 1980’s: integrated digital systems ARP4754 • 1990’s: PLDs, ASICs, FPGAs and other CEH ARP4761 • 2000’s: highly integrated & complex DO-254 ARP4754A systems Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754 Background • During preparation of DO178B, it was determined that system level information was needed as input to Software Development process. • FAA requested SAE to prepare an ARP for demonstrating regulatory compliance for highly-integrated or complex avionics systems. • A Systems Integration Requirements Task group (SIRT) was formed to draft the ARP, which became ARP4754. Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754 Background • Since harmonization was deemed highly desirable, representatives of both the FAA and JAA were engaged. • Working group WG-42 was formed to coordinate European input to the SIRT group. • The SIRT group members included those with direct design & support experience in: – Large commercial aircraft – Commuter aircraft – Commercial & general aviation avionics – Jet engines, and – Engine controls Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754 Background • Formal & informal links with RTCA & SAE committees SC-167, SC-180 and S-18. • 14CFR/CS 25.1309 harmonization working group was involved. • Decision to focus on fundamental principles of certification Vs providing a “very specific list of certification steps” • ARP4754 published in 1996 Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754A Background • Written / published in Dec 2010 by S-18 & WG- 63 committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 1.0
    Standardization roadmap For Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 1.0 Prepared by the ANSI Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization Collaborative (UASSC) December 2018 ©2018 American National Standards Institute (ANSI). All rights reserved. Published by ANSI. Printed in the United States of America. Limited License: This material may be copied without permission from ANSI only for non-commercial and non-promotional purposes and if and to the extent that text is not altered or deleted in any fashion and the ANSI copyright is clearly noted as set forth immediately above. No part of this publication may be re- produced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, except as permitted by the Limited License or under Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act, without prior written permission of the publisher. Material in this publication is for educational purposes. Neither the publisher nor the authors assume any liability for any errors or omissions or for how this publication or its contents are used or interpreted or for any consequences resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this publication. For legal or other advice, please consult your personal lawyer or the appropriate professional. The views expressed by the individuals in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views shared by the companies they are employed by (or the companies mentioned in this publication). The employment status and affiliations of authors with the companies referenced are subject to change. Table of Contents Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Acknowledgments …..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 15 Summary Table of Gaps and Recommendations……………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture-Led Safety Process
    Architecture-Led Safety Process Peter H. Feiler Julien Delange David P. Gluch John D. McGregor December 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT CMU/SEI-2016-TR-012 Software Solutions Division Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited http://www.sei.cmu.edu Copyright 2016 Carnegie Mellon University This material is based upon work funded and supported by the Department of Defense under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineer- ing Institute, a federally funded research and development center. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Defense. This report was prepared for the SEI Administrative Agent AFLCMC/PZM 20 Schilling Circle, Bldg 1305, 3rd floor Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-2125 NO WARRANTY. THIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS” BASIS. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. [Distribution Statement A] This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribu- tion. Please see Copyright notice for non-US Government use and distribution. Internal use:* Permission to reproduce this material and to prepare derivative works from this material for internal use is granted, provided the copyright and “No Warranty” statements are included with all reproductions and derivative works.
    [Show full text]