DOCSLIB.ORG

A Course Material on Maintenance Engineering by Mr. ERSIVAKUMAR

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Course Material on Maintenance Engineering by Mr. ERSIVAKUMAR A Course Material on Maintenance Engineering By Mr. E.R.SIVAKUMAR.M.E,(Ph.D), HEAD & ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SASURIE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING VIJAYAMANGALAM – 638 056 QUALITY CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the e-course material Subject Code : ME2037 Scubject : Maintenance Engineering Class : IV Year being prepared by me and it meets the knowledge requirement of the university curriculum. Signature of the Author Name: Mr.E.R.SIVAKUMAR.M.E,(Ph.D) Designation: This is to certify that the course material being prepared by Mr.E.R.Sivakumar M.E,(Ph.D) is of adequate quality. He has referred more than five books among them minimum one is from abroad author. Signature of HD Name:Mr.E.R.SIVAKUMAR.M.E,(Ph.D), SEAL CONTENTS SL. PAGE TOPICS NO. NO. SYLLABUS UNIT – I PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF MAINTENANCE PLANNING 1.1 Maintenance Engineering 1 1.1.1.Introduction 1 1.1.2. Maintenance Manager 2 1.1.3.Maintenance Engineering Jobs 2 1.1.4.Definition of Maintenance 2 1.1.5.Purpose of Maintenance 2 1.1.6.Principle Objectives in Maintenance 2 1.1.7.Problems in Maintenance 2 1.2 Basic Principles of maintenance planning 3 1.2.1.Maintenance Planning 3 1.2.2. Planning Objectives 3 1.2.3. Planning Procedures 3 1.2.4.Basic Levels of Planning Process (Depend on The Planning 4 Horizon) 1.2.4.1.Long Range Planning 4 1.2.4.2. Medium-Range Planning 4 1.2.4.3. Short-Range Planning 4 1.3 Objectives and Principles of Planned Maintenance Activity 4 1.4 Importance and benefits of sound Maintenance systems 5 1.5 1.5.1.Maintenance organization 5 1.5.2.Maintenance Organization Objectives and Responsibility 5 1.5.3.Determinants of a Maintenance Organization 6 1.5.4.Maintenance Capacity Planning 6 1.5.5. Centralization vs Decentralization 6 1.5.6 In-house vs Outsourcing 7 7 1.5.7.Design of the Maintenance Organization 7 1.5.8 Current Criteria for Organizational Change 8 1.5.9 Criteria to Assess Organizational Effectiveness 8 1.5.10. Basic Types of Organizational Models 9 1.5.11.Material and Spare Parts Management 12 1.5.12. Establishment of Authority and Reporting 12 1.5.13. Quality of Leadership and Supervision 12 1.5.14. Incentives 12 1.5.15. Education and Training 12 1.5.16. Management and Labor Relations 13 1.5.17. Summary 13 1.6 Maintenance economics 13 1.7 Reliability 17 UNIT II MAINTENANCE POLICIES – PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 2.1 Maintenance Catagories 22 2.2 Total Productive Maintenance 23 2.3 Stakeholders 25 2.4 Maintenance Scheduling 32 2.5 Elements of Sound Scheduling 34 2.6 Maintenance Job Priority System 35 2.7 Scheduling Techniques 35 2.7.1 Gantt Charts and Scheduling Theory 36 2.7.2 Project Scheduling 39 2.7.3 Critical Path Method 43 2.7.4 Program Evaluation Review Techniques (PERT) 45 2.8 Scheduling Using Computers 47 2.9 Summary 47 2.10 Lubrication 48 UNIT III CONDITION MONITORING 3.1 Condition Monitoring 52 3.2 Methods Of Cm 53 3.3 Benefits 54 3.4 Load Testing 55 3.5 Types of Condition Monitoring Systems 55 3.6 Establishing a Condition Monitoring Program 57 3.7 Condition Monitoring Of Machinery 58 3.8 Principles and Methods 61 3.9 Vibration Monitoring System (VMS) Specification 63 3.10 Thermistors 64 3.11 Wear Debris Analysis 75 UNIT IV REPAIR METHODS FOR BASIC MACHINE ELEMENTS 4.1 Repair Methods For Beds 76 4.2 Repair methods for slideways 88 4.3 FMEA - Failure Modes and Effects Analysis 96 4.4 Gears 98 4.5 Bearings 111 4.6 Factors Influencing the Performance of Ball and Rolling Bearing 116 UNIT V REPAIR METHODS FOR MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 5.1 Material-handling equipment 141 5.2 Maintenance Strategies for Overhead Cranes and Lifting Equipment 142 5.3 A systems approach for maintenance and renewal efficiency 145 5.4 The Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) 147 5.5 Work Order System 157 QUESTION BANK 160 UNIVERSITY QUESTION PAPERS 204 ME1012 – MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING L T P C 3 0 0 3 UNIT I PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF MAINTENANCE PLANNING 10 Basic principles of maintenance planning – Objectives and principles of planned maintenance activity – Importance and benefits of sound maintenance systems – Reliability and machine availability – MTBF, MTTR and MWT – Factors of availability – Maintenance organization – Maintenance economics. UNIT II MAINTENANCE POLICIES – PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 9 Maintenance categories – Comparative merits of each category – Preventive maintenance, maintenance schedules and repair cycle – Principles and methods of lubrication – TPM. UNIT III CONDITION MONITORING 9 Condition monitoring – Cost comparison with and without CM – On-load testing and off-load testing – Methods and instruments for CM – Temperature sensitive tapes – Pistol thermometers – Wear-debris analysis. UNIT IV REPAIR METHODS FOR BASIC MACHINE ELEMENTS 10 Repair methods for beds, slide-ways, spindles, gears, lead screws and bearings – Failure analysis – Failures and their development – Logical fault location methods – Sequential fault location. UNIT V REPAIR METHODS FOR MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 8 Repair methods for material handling equipment – Equipment records – Job order systems –Use of computers in maintenance. Total: 45 TEXT BOOKS 1. Srivastava, S.K., “Industrial Maintenance Management”, S. Chand and Co., 1981. 2. Bhattacharya, S.N., “Installation, Servicing and Maintenance”, S. Chand and Co., 1995. REFERENCES 1. Garg, M.R., “Industrial Maintenance”, S. Chand and Co., 1986. 2. Higgins, L.R., “Maintenance Engineering Handbook”, 5th Edition, McGraw Hill, 1988. 3. Davies, “Handbook of Condition Monitoring”, Chapman and Hall, 1996. ME2037 Maintenance Engineering UNIT-1 PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF MAINTENANCE PLANNING 1.1.Maintenance Engineering 1.1.1.Introduction Maintenance Engineering is the discipline and profession of applying engineering concepts to the optimization of equipment, procedures, and departmental budgets to achieve better maintainability, reliability, and availability of equipment. Maintenance engineering is the occupation that uses engineering theories and practices to plan and implement routine maintenance of equipment and machinery. This must be done in conjunction with optimizing operating procedures and budgets to attain and sustain the highest levels of reliability and profit. Maintenance engineers are often required to have knowledge of many types of equipment and machinery. A person working in the field of maintenance engineering must have in-depth knowledge of or experience in basic equipment operation, logistics, probability, and statistics. Experience in the operation and maintenance of machinery specific to a company's particular business is also frequently required. Since the position normally requires oral and written communications with various levels of personnel, excellent interpersonal communication and participatory management skills are also desirable. Maintenance engineering positions require planning and implementing routine and preventive maintenance programs. In addition, regular monitoring of equipment is required to visually detect faults and impending equipment or production failures before they occur. These positions may also require observing and overseeing repairs and maintenance performed by outside vendors and contractors. In a production or manufacturing environment, good maintenance engineering is necessary for smooth and safe daily plant operations. Maintenance engineers not only monitor the existing systems and equipment, they also recommend improved systems and help decide when systems are outdated and in need of replacement. Such a position often involves exchanging ideas and information with other maintenance engineers, production managers, and manufacturing systems engineers. Maintenance engineering not only requires engineers to monitor large production machine operations and heavy duty equipment, but also often requires involvement with computer operations. Maintenance engineers may have to deal with everything from PCs, routers, servers, and software to more complex issues like local and off-site networks, configuration systems, end user support, and scheduled upgrades. Supervision of technical personnel may also be required. Good maintenance engineering is vital to the success of any manufacturing or processing operation, regardless of size. The maintenance engineer is responsible for the efficiency of daily operations and for discovering and solving any operational problems in the plant. A company's success may depend on a quality maintenance engineering department that can be depended upon to discover systematic flaws and recommend solid, practical solutions. SCE 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering ME2037 Maintenance Engineering 1.1.2. Maintenance Manager If you choose to take an entry-level position in order to become a facilities maintenancemanager, you can expect to spend several years working maintenance positions as you learn the skills necessary to become a manager. Larger employers with greater maintenance needs generally look for a facilities maintenancemanager who can perform these tasks when needed, but is more focused on managing an in-house staff responsible for the majority of the actual work. 1.1.3.Maintenance Engineering Jobs Typically, maintenance engineers need to possess knowledge of the principles of building or mechanical engineering. Maintenance engineer jobs generally require the person to maintain the plant or manage a crew who maintains it. They also set schedules, hand out paychecks, assign job duties, and monitor daily progress. Most construction engineeringjobs require at least a bachelor's
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before You Continue
    NASA/CR–2015-218982 Application of SAE ARP4754A to Flight Critical Systems Eric M. Peterson Electron International II, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona November 2015 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. advancement of aeronautics and space science. The Collected papers from scientific and technical NASA scientific and technical information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the auspices SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It collects, technical, or historical information from NASA organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates programs, projects, and missions, often NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access concerned with subjects having substantial to the NTRS Registered and its public interface, the public interest. NASA Technical Reports Server, thus providing one of the largest collections of aeronautical and space TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. science STI in the world. Results are published in both English-language translations of foreign non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI scientific and technical material pertinent to Report Series, which includes the following report NASA’s mission. types: Specialized services also include organizing TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of and publishing research results, distributing completed research or a major significant phase of specialized research announcements and feeds, research that present the results of NASA providing information desk and personal search Programs and include extensive data or theoretical support, and enabling data exchange services. analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and technical data and information For more information about the NASA STI program, deemed to be of continuing reference value.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance, Process Engineer
    THOMMEN AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT Renowned Swiss manufacturer of high precision Aviation Instruments, Air Data Computers, Digital Chronometers and Mission Equipment Established in 1853 under Revue Thommen AG, Thommen Aircraft Equipment Ltd is a renowned Swiss manufacturer of high precision aviation instruments, avionics and mission equipment. The company has celebrated its 100 years anniversary of supplying aviation products to its customers. Thommen Aircraft Equipment AG is currently in the phase of introducing several innovative and exciting products to the market and will gradually increase the general product offering in the course of 2018/2019. To sustain the new company plans, product development, we are looking to hire a skilled and experienced Quality Assurance / Process Engineer – Avionics 100% (m/f) The person will be responsible for leading activities involving Product Lifecycle Management processes. Focused on improving processes and tools, the position is ideal for a candidate seeking a broad technical and business process career. The position offers the opportunity to work as part of a global team which will require flexibility to support activities across multiple time zones for following process development activities. Our culture is to hire only the finest talent and to uphold our values of teamwork, accountability, humor, efficiency, candor and continual improvement. Responsibilities & Tasks • Develop DO-178C and DO-254 process compliance and quality plan, (QAP, SQAP HQAP) • Responsible for reporting assessment and evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Assessment Processes of ARP4761: Major Revision
    Safety Assessment Processes of ARP4761: Major Revision Jim Marko Manager, Aircraft Integration & Safety Assessment 14 November 2018 Presentation Outline • What is changing • ARP4761 Relationship to ARP4754A Development Assurance • New methods • Changes to existing methods • Safety methods other than ARP4761A 14 November 2018 2 ARP4761A Safety Assessment Process What’s happening to ARP 4761? • Revision commenced in early 2012 within the SAE S18 Aircraft & Systems Development and Safety Assessment Committee. • Essentially a near complete revision of the document that is nearing publication. • New processes and analytical methods being added to reflect the trend towards more highly integrated and increasingly complex system designs. • Introduces the concept of Aircraft-Level safety assessment to complement the traditional system-level safety assessment approach. 14 November 2018 3 Current ARP 4761 Rev- New Appendices for ARP 4761 Other Appendices Rev A Developments Functional Hazard Aircraft Functional Hazard Assessment Single Event Effects Assessment AIR 6218 Preliminary System Safety Preliminary Aircraft Safety Assessment Assessment System Functional Hazard Assessment In-Service Safety System Safety Assessment Aircraft Safety Assessment Assessment ARP 5150/5151 FTA, DD, FMEA, Markov Cascading Effects Analysis Common Mode Analysis Development Assurance Assignment Particular Risk Analysis Model Based Safety Assessment Zonal Safety Analysis Contiguous Example Contiguous Example 14 November 2018 4 ARP4761A Safety Assessment Process Interactions ARP 4754A Development Assurance Processes 14 November 2018 5 ARP4761 Relationship to ARP4754A Development Assurance • Modern aircraft architecture is increasingly becoming a “system-of-systems”, where many systems interact with and are dependent upon each other to perform aircraft functional objectives. • The era of having federated systems that can be correctly and completely assessed in silos, independent from other systems, is rapidly closing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering Student Handbook
    Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering Student Handbook Table of Contents Welcome ......................................................................................................................... 1 From the Undergraduate Program Chair .................................................................................................. 1 About the Profession & Program ..................................................................................... 2 Faculty ............................................................................................................................. 5 Admission Requirements ................................................................................................ 6 Degree Requirements ..................................................................................................... 7 Curriculum ..................................................................................................................... 10 IE Course Descriptions .................................................................................................. 11 Technical Electives........................................................................................................ 13 Non-IE Engineering Electives (Engineering Science Breadth) ...................................... 16 Directed Electives.......................................................................................................... 16 Academic Policies ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Product Support (IPS) Elements Guidebook Has Now Also Been Extensively Updated to Reflect Current Policy and Guidance
    Product Support Management IPS Elements Guidebook Forward In October 2009, Section 805 of Public Law 111-84 established the key leadership position of Product Support Manager (PSM) and reiterated DoD’s commitment to life cycle product support management. By 2010, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (ASD) Logistics and Materiel Readiness (L&MR) concluded the seminal work to develop and implement a Product Support Business Model (PSBM) and published a series of Guidebooks to assist the Product Support Manager (PSM) in the execution of his or her duties. These Guidebooks included the “DoD Product Support Manager Guidebook”, the “DoD Product Support Business Case Assessment (BCA) Guidebook” and the “DoD Logistics Assessment (LA) Guidebook”. Since 2010, the existing Product Support Guidebooks have been updated and a few new ones have been developed to fill information gaps. This Integrated Product Support (IPS) Elements Guidebook has now also been extensively updated to reflect current policy and guidance. It picks up where the Product Support Manager Guidebook Appendix A left off in describing the 12 IPS Elements. Program Managers, Product Support Managers and Life Cycle Logisticians should use this Guidebook as a reference source and training aid supporting their responsibilities, tailored to the needs of each program. The term “Integrated” in the term “Integrated Product Support Element” is critical. The Product Support Manager must understand how each element is affected by and linked with the others and should employ all
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of DO-178C
    Table of Contents Overview of Section 450.141 ................................................................................2 Overview of Section AC 450.141-1 ........................................................................2 Overview of DO-178C ............................................................................................3 Implementing AC 450.141-1 Using DO-178C.........................................................4 Identification of Computing System Safety Items ................................................... 5 Levels of Criticality ........................................................................................................... 7 Safety Requirements ................................................................................................ 9 Development Processes ........................................................................................ 12 Application Materials ............................................................................................. 21 AC 450.141-1 Process Summary ........................................................................ 22 References ......................................................................................................... 23 List of Tables Table 1 Identification of Computing System Safety Items ......................................... 6 Table 2 Levels of Criticality .......................................................................................... 7 Table 3 Safety Requirements ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Total Productive Maintenance: a Case Study in Manufacturing Industry
    Global Journal of researches in engineering Industrial engineering Volume 12 Issue 1 Version 1.0 February 2012 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA) Online ISSN: 2249-4596 Print ISSN:0975-5861 Total Productive Maintenance: A Case Study in Manufacturing Industry By Melesse Workneh Wakjira, Ajit Pal Singh Adama Science & Technology University Abstract - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the contributions of total productive maintenance (TPM) initiatives towards improving manufacturing performance in Ethiopian malt manufacturing industry. The correlations between various TPM implementation dimensions and manufacturing performance improvements have been evaluated and validated by employing overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) in boiler plant. The research focuses upon the significant contributions of TPM implementation success factors like top management leadership and involvement, traditional maintenance practices and holistic TPM implementation initiatives, towards affecting improvements in manufacturing performance in the Ethiopian industry. The study establishes that focused TPM implementation over a reasonable time period can strategically contribute towards realization of significant manufacturing performance enhancements. The study highlights the strong potential of TPM implementation initiatives in affecting organizational performance improvements. The achievements of Ethiopian manufacturing organizations through proactive TPM initiatives have been evaluated and
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs and Benefits of Advanced Maintenance in Manufacturing
    NIST AMS 100-18 The Costs and Benefits of Advanced Maintenance in Manufacturing Douglas S. Thomas This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-18 NIST AMS 100-18 The Costs and Benefits of Advanced Maintenance in Manufacturing Douglas S. Thomas Applied Economics Office Engineering Laboratory This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-18 April 2018 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Photo Credit: The Chrysler 200 Factory Tour, an interactive online experience using Google Maps Business View technology, takes consumers inside the new 5-million-square-foot Sterling Heights Assembly Plant for a behind-the-scenes peek at how the 2015 Chrysler 200 is built. http://media.fcanorthamerica.com/homepage.do?mid=1 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... iii Introduction ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intro to ARP4754A 140723
    Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems Introduction to ARP4754A 23 July, 2014 Avionics Systems Evolution • Early Aviation: mainly mechanical equipment • 1960’s: increased electronic controls • 1970’s: analog equipment supported by low level, simple software DO-178 • 1980’s: integrated digital systems ARP4754 • 1990’s: PLDs, ASICs, FPGAs and other CEH ARP4761 • 2000’s: highly integrated & complex DO-254 ARP4754A systems Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754 Background • During preparation of DO178B, it was determined that system level information was needed as input to Software Development process. • FAA requested SAE to prepare an ARP for demonstrating regulatory compliance for highly-integrated or complex avionics systems. • A Systems Integration Requirements Task group (SIRT) was formed to draft the ARP, which became ARP4754. Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754 Background • Since harmonization was deemed highly desirable, representatives of both the FAA and JAA were engaged. • Working group WG-42 was formed to coordinate European input to the SIRT group. • The SIRT group members included those with direct design & support experience in: – Large commercial aircraft – Commuter aircraft – Commercial & general aviation avionics – Jet engines, and – Engine controls Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754 Background • Formal & informal links with RTCA & SAE committees SC-167, SC-180 and S-18. • 14CFR/CS 25.1309 harmonization working group was involved. • Decision to focus on fundamental principles of certification Vs providing a “very specific list of certification steps” • ARP4754 published in 1996 Esterline Control Systems Introduction to ARP4754A SAE ARP4754A Background • Written / published in Dec 2010 by S-18 & WG- 63 committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 1.0
    Standardization roadmap For Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 1.0 Prepared by the ANSI Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization Collaborative (UASSC) December 2018 ©2018 American National Standards Institute (ANSI). All rights reserved. Published by ANSI. Printed in the United States of America. Limited License: This material may be copied without permission from ANSI only for non-commercial and non-promotional purposes and if and to the extent that text is not altered or deleted in any fashion and the ANSI copyright is clearly noted as set forth immediately above. No part of this publication may be re- produced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, except as permitted by the Limited License or under Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act, without prior written permission of the publisher. Material in this publication is for educational purposes. Neither the publisher nor the authors assume any liability for any errors or omissions or for how this publication or its contents are used or interpreted or for any consequences resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this publication. For legal or other advice, please consult your personal lawyer or the appropriate professional. The views expressed by the individuals in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views shared by the companies they are employed by (or the companies mentioned in this publication). The employment status and affiliations of authors with the companies referenced are subject to change. Table of Contents Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Acknowledgments …..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 15 Summary Table of Gaps and Recommendations……………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • ANSI UASSC Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems – V2 Page 3 of 410
    STANDARDIZATION ROADMAP For Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 2.0 Prepared by the ANSI Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization Collaborative (UASSC): June 2020 ©2020 American National Standards Institute (ANSI). All rights reserved. Published by ANSI. Printed in the United States of America. Limited License: This material may be copied without permission from ANSI only for non- commercial and non-promotional purposes and if and to the extent that text is not altered or deleted in any fashion and the ANSI copyright is clearly noted as set forth immediately above. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, except as permitted by the Limited License or under Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act, without prior written permission of the publisher. Material in this publication is for educational purposes. Neither the publisher nor the authors assume any liability for any errors or omissions or for how this publication or its contents are used or interpreted or for any consequences resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this publication. For legal or other advice, please consult your personal lawyer or the appropriate professional. The views expressed by the individuals in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views shared by the companies they are employed by (or the companies mentioned in this publication). The employment status and affiliations of authors with the companies referenced are subject to change. Table of Contents Table of Contents …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Summary of Major Changes from Version 1.0 ………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture-Led Safety Process
    Architecture-Led Safety Process Peter H. Feiler Julien Delange David P. Gluch John D. McGregor December 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT CMU/SEI-2016-TR-012 Software Solutions Division Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited http://www.sei.cmu.edu Copyright 2016 Carnegie Mellon University This material is based upon work funded and supported by the Department of Defense under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineer- ing Institute, a federally funded research and development center. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Defense. This report was prepared for the SEI Administrative Agent AFLCMC/PZM 20 Schilling Circle, Bldg 1305, 3rd floor Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-2125 NO WARRANTY. THIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS” BASIS. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. [Distribution Statement A] This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribu- tion. Please see Copyright notice for non-US Government use and distribution. Internal use:* Permission to reproduce this material and to prepare derivative works from this material for internal use is granted, provided the copyright and “No Warranty” statements are included with all reproductions and derivative works.
    [Show full text]