DOCSLIB.ORG

HS2 Appendix 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Agenda Item No: 08 – Appendix 1 Freepost RTEL-YAZX-HAZT Phase Two Route Consultation PO Box 1152 HARROW HA1 9LH Dear Sir/ Madam, High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future – Consultation on the route from the West Midlands to Manchester, Leeds and beyond Northamptonshire County Council welcomes the opportunity to respond to the above consultation. HS2 is an important issue to this Council, and despite the impact of the route on parts of the county, we support the proposals on the basis of the supposed benefits that we will receive from released capacity from both Phase 1 on the West Coast Main Line and Phase 2 on the Midland Main Line. On this basis, I have taken the view to concentrate our response to the consultation based on our main area of interest in relation to Phase 2; the opportunities for released capacity on the Midland Main Line and the connections to High Speed Rail at both the proposed Birmingham Interchange and East Midlands Hub stations. North Northamptonshire is a rapidly growing area of the County, with 12,973, 5,544 and 9,975 new houses planned and an equivalent level of new jobs in Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough between 2011 and 2021. Therefore securing a high service frequency is critical to the future economic wellbeing and economic competitiveness of the area. As outlined in our response, we have been disappointed to date to not have been involved in detailed discussions regarding the opportunities for released capacity on the Midland Main Line as we are keen to do so. If you require any further clarification of the issues raised in our response or a contact for setting up a supplementary meeting then please contact my office who will provide details of the most appropriate contact. Yours faithfully, Tony Ciaburro etc Agenda Item No: 08 – Appendix 1 High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Consultation on the route from the West Midlands to Manchester, Leeds and beyond Northamptonshire County Council Consultation Response i) Do you agree or disagree with the Government’s proposed route between the West Midlands and Manchester as described in Chapter 7? This includes the proposed route alignment, the location of tunnels, ventilation shafts, cuttings, viaducts and depots as well as how the high speed line will connect to the West Coast Main Line. No comment ii) Do you agree or disagree with the Government’s proposals for: a) A Manchester station at Manchester Piccadilly as described in Chapter 7 (sections 7.8.1 – 7.8.7)? We welcome the proposal for a station at Manchester Piccadilly as its location at a key existing rail interchange should facilitate easy access to the city centre and ready interchange with other rail and public transport services for onward travel. b) An additional station near Manchester Airport as described in Chapter 7 (sections 7.6.1 – 7.6.6)? We welcome the proposal for a station at Manchester Airport which will help to increase the range of airports that can be readily accessed by Northamptonshire travellers. iii) Do you think that there should be any additional stations on the western leg between the West Midlands and Manchester? No comment. iv) Do you agree or disagree with the Government’s proposed route between West Midlands and Leeds as described in Chapter 8? This includes the proposed route alignment, the location of tunnels, ventilation shafts, cuttings, viaducts and depots as well as how the high speed line will connect to the East Coast Main Line. No comment v) Do you agree or disagree with the Government’s proposals for: a) A Leeds station at Leeds New Lane as described in Chapter 8 (sections 8.8.1 – 8.8.5)? Agenda Item No: 08 – Appendix 1 While would ideally wish to see a station closer to the existing one, we believe that the proposed station at Leeds New Lane would be acceptable in terms of access to the city centre and interchange with National Rail services. b) A South Yorkshire station to be located at Sheffield Meadowhall as described in Chapter 8 (sections 8.5.1 – 8.5.8)? While we think that a South Yorkshire station should be ideally located in Sheffield city centre, adjacent to the existing National Rail station, we recognise that constraints prevent this. We believe that the proposal for a station at Meadowhall is an acceptable alternative, permitting access to wide of destinations both in South Yorkshire and further afield (eg Hull and Cleethorpes). c) An East Midlands station to be located at Toton as described in Chapter 8 (sections 8.3.1 – 8.3.6)? As currently proposed East Midlands station will be the nearest connection for those in North Northamptonshire to access the High Speed Rail network for onward connections to Sheffield Meadowhall, Leeds and destinations further north. By locating the East Midlands station at Toton, journey times to Derby and Nottingham on the Midland Main Line (MML) from Kettering and Wellingborough are set to increase due to services having to reverse at Toton to go on to serve Derby and Nottingham, which represents a significant disbenefit to North Northamptonshire. Furthermore, it is recognised in Network Rail’s Better Connections: Options for the integration of High Speed 2 that the benefits of released capacity on the MML from High Speed Rail is limited because unlike the WCML, which parallels much of the HS2 Phase Two line, the HS2 service pattern does not directly replicate existing MML intermediate services. To some extent this is a product of choosing to locate the stations serving Nottingham, Derby and Sheffield on the High Speed network outside of the city centres, as the time penalty for accessing the stations means that in some instances the MML will remain more competitive and therefore demand will exist to provide a similar level of long distance services, and thus the demand released for the regional and local lines is not as great. Analysis undertaken by HS2 Ltd does however indicate that a Hub Station at Toton (serving both HS2 and classic rail access) is capable of serving a much larger population than any single city centre station location in the East Midlands and therefore has the strongest business case. In light of this, Northamptonshire County Council would urge that maximum access to the new Hub station by national rail, tram, bus, walking and cycling from all areas of Derby and Nottingham is achieved to the maximise the accessibility of the site, and in doing so, minimise the time penalty of using it and therefore increase its attractiveness to maximise the amount of released capacity that can be achieved. Agenda Item No: 08 – Appendix 1 Whilst North Northamptonshire is set to lose out in terms of journey times, we believe that there are opportunities to increase the benefits of a station at Toton by improving connectivity via the East Midlands Station. For example, by running classic-compatible services from St Pancras calling at Wellingborough, Kettering and Leicester to East Midlands Station and on to the High Speed lines, connectivity could be achieved to Sheffield, Leeds and other destinations further north, much greater benefits for North Northamptonshire. *Insert link to study that East Midlands Councils have commissioned?* vi) Do you think that there should be any additional stations on the eastern leg between the West Midlands and Leeds? No comment vii) Please let us know your comments on the Appraisal of Sustainability (as reported in the Sustainability Statement) of the Government’s proposed Phase Two route, including the alternatives to the proposed route as described in Chapter 9. No comment viii) Please let us know your comments on how the capacity that would be freed up on the existing rail network by the introduction of the proposed Phase Two route could be used as described in Chapter 10. HS2 is an important issue to this council, and despite the impact of the route on parts of the county, we support the proposals on the basis of the supposed benefits that we will receive from released capacity from both Phase 1 on the West Coast Main Line (WCML) and Phase 2 on the Midland Main Line (MML). To inform our response we have considered not just the commentary provided in the Chapter 10 of the Phase 2 Consultation Document, and the associated Better Connections: Options for the integration of High Speed 2 (Network Rail, July 2013), but also the following documents which have also been published by HS2 Ltd and Network Rail in recent years which are also relevant: The Strategic Economic Case – PFM v4.3 assumptions report (HS2 Ltd, October 2013) The Regional Urban Market Study (Network Rail, October 2013) HS2 Regional Economic Impacts (HS2 Ltd, September 2013) Updated Economic Case for HS2 (August 2012): Explanation of the Service Patterns (HS2 Ltd, January 2013) West Coast Main Line services The key priority for Northamptonshire County Council in terms of the use of released capacity on the West Coast Main Line is ensuring that there is good connectivity between Northampton, Long Buckby, and other WCML stations Agenda Item No: 08 – Appendix 1 such as Milton Keynes Central and Rugby used by Northamptonshire residents to key destinations on the West Coast Main Line. Our adopted Rail Strategy (January 2013) has an aspiration for an hourly service opportunity to Chester, Liverpool, Manchester, Preston, Lancaster, Carlisle and Glasgow with no more than one change and with a journey time less than the current journey times from London Euston to each of those destinations. This could be achieved in future services specifications by a number of means, including the restoration of a direct service from Northampton to Trent Valley stations and Crewe, additional calls by long-distance services at Rugby, or by interchange between Birmingham International and Birmingham Interchange stations.
Recommended publications
  • Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport

    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport

    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport 30 August 2017 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Department for Transport’s information and use in relation to Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Business Case. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 108 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5159267 Document ref: v4.0 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Interim draft for client Rev 1.0 - 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft for client Rev 2.0 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft addressing Rev 3.0 - 22/08/2017 client comment Rev 4.0 Final 30/08/2017 Client signoff Client Department for Transport Project Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Document title Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme: KO1 Final Business Case Job no. 5159267 Copy no. Document reference Atkins Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme | Version 4.0 | 30 August 2017 | 5159267 2 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 12 1.1. Background 12 1.2. Report Structure 13 2. Scope of the Appraisal 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Scenario Development 14 3. Timetable Development 18 3.1. Overview 18 4. Demand & Revenue Forecasting 26 4.1. Introduction 26 4.2. Forecasting methodology 26 4.3. Appraisal of Benefits 29 4.4.
  • High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead?

    High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead?

    High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead? The UK government has given the “green light” to the High Speed Two (HS2) rail project in its entirety, following the outcome of the Oakervee Review, ending months of speculation over the future of the scheme. Phase 2b of the project, linking Crewe to Manchester and Birmingham to Leeds via Sheffield, is subject to further review. It now forms part of an ambitious “High Speed North” integrated masterplan, including Northern Powerhouse Rail and other local rail improvements. What will this mean for landowners, occupiers and others who are directly affected by the HS2 scheme? Time will tell. However, the announcement is likely to be welcomed, as it provides certainty that the project will now proceed, although concerns over the long-term plans for delivery of Phase 2b will persist. HS2 Limited’s remit will be to “…focus solely on getting On all fronts, the government’s announcement gives phases 1 and 2A built on something approaching on time grounds for optimism. The government has pledged to learn and on budget” and, in respect of Phase 2b, new “delivery lessons from Phase 1 and improve how the project is being arrangements” will be put in place, but not before “…an delivered, highlighting the need for better communication and integrated plan for rail in the north” has been introduced. engagement with local communities impacted by the scheme. Grand plans no doubt, but close attention will be paid to the detail, including the enabling legislation required to deliver Major concerns will also remain over the delivery of the Phase 2a of the project and future plans for the design and scheme, including timescales for completion of each phase, delivery arrangements for Phase 2b.
  • Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015

    Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015

    Crossrail 2 factsheet: Services between Berrylands and Hampton Court New Crossrail 2 services are proposed to serve all stations between Berrylands and Hampton Court, with 4 trains per hour in each direction operating directly to, and across central London. What is Crossrail 2? Crossrail 2 in this area Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway serving London and the wider South East that could be open by 2030. It would connect the existing National Rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire with trains running through a new tunnel from Wimbledon to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate. Crossrail 2 will connect directly with National Rail, London Underground, London Overground, Crossrail 1, High Speed 1 international and domestic and High Speed 2 services, meaning passengers will be one change away from over 800 destinations nationwide. Why do we need Crossrail 2? The South West Main Line is one of the busiest and most congested routes in the country. It already faces capacity constraints and demand for National Rail services into Waterloo is forecast to increase by at least 40% by 2043. This means the severe crowding on the network will nearly double, and would likely lead to passengers being unable to board trains at some stations. Crossrail 2 provides a solution. It would free up space on the railway helping to reduce congestion, and would enable us to run more local services to central London that bypass the most congested stations. Transport improvements already underway will help offset the pressure in the short term. But we need Crossrail 2 to cope with longer term growth.
  • Management Case for High Speed 2

    Management Case for High Speed 2

    Management Case for High Speed 2 1 Contents Introduction 4 Timetable to an operational railway 5 Governance 7 Planning 16 Risk Management 17 Issue Management 18 Change Control 19 Assurance 24 Benefit Realisation and Evaluation 25 Communication and Stakeholder Management 26 Building Capability and Capacity 28 Document Control 30 Annex A – Governance Framework for High Speed 2 31 Annex B – Remit letter 32 Annex C – DfT High Speed Rail Organogram 36 Annex D – HS2 Ltd Organogram 37 Annex E – Risk and Issue Management Strategy 38 Annex F - Integrated Assurance and Approvals Plan 53 Annex G – Benefit Realisation and Evaluation Strategy 73 Annex H - Communications Plan 84 Annex I – Resource Management Plan 111 2 Purpose 1. The purpose of the Management Case is to provide confidence that credible and robust arrangements are in place to deliver the High Speed 2 (HS2) programme to time, cost and quality. It includes: . an outline of the HS2 programme and how it will be delivered; . governance arrangements for the programme, including the role of the High Speed Rail Programme Board, the separate Project Boards and HS2 Ltd’s own governance; . details on the programme of work planned and how key milestones are tracked; . evidence on how risks and issues are managed and escalated; . detail on how change is and will be managed within the programme; . arrangements for programme and project assurance; . our communication plan for the programme, including how we engage with stakeholders; . how we plan to manage and record the benefits from the programme; . contingency and resource planning arrangements; and . document control arrangements. 2.
  • High Speed Two Limited

    High Speed Two Limited

    High Speed Two Limited High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) High Speed Two Limited H igh Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) March 2011 This r eport t akes i nto a ccount t he particular instructions and requirements of our client. It i s not i ntended f or a nd s hould n ot be relied u pon b y any third p arty a nd no responsibility i s u ndertaken to any t hird Ove Arup & Partners Ltd party The Arup Campus, Blythe Gate, Blythe Valley Park, Solihull, West Midlands. B90 8AE Tel +44 (0)121 213 3000 Fax +44 (0)121 213 3001 www.arup.com Job number High Speed Two (HS2) High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The December 2009 Report 1 1.2 Layout of this Report 1 2 Scope of Work, Methodology and Deliverables 2 2.1 Scope of Work 2 2.2 Meeting 1 2 2.3 Intermediate instructions 3 2.4 Meeting 2 3 3 Current Rail Operations and Future Developments 4 3.1 Context 4 3.2 Oxford - Bletchley 4 3.3 Aylesbury – Claydon Line 4 3.4 High Speed 2 5 3.5 Evergreen 3 5 3.6 East West Project 5 4 Functional Requirements 6 5 Site Location Options 7 5.1 Introduction 7 5.2 Quadrant 1 9 5.3 Quadrant 2 11 5.4 Quadrant 3 15 5.5 Quadrant 4 17 5.6 Sites on HS2 (north) 18 6 Cost Estimates 20 6.1 Matrix table for all Site options 20 7 Conclusion 21 8 Selected Option Development 23 8.1 General layout 23 8.2 Specific site details 27 8.3 Site operation 28 8.4 West end connections 29 9 Calvert Waste Plant 30 9.1 Rail Access 30 9.2 Heat and power generation 32 10 Use of site as a potential construction depot 33
  • Delivering High Speed 2 Major Project Report

    Delivering High Speed 2 Major Project Report

    DELIVERING HIGH SPEED 2 MAJOR PROJECT REPORT New rail reality Developing a £33bn rail network to transform Uk’s north-soUth 03|2012 CONNECTIONS Special report | High Speed 2 03 | 2012 Foreword 04 infrastructure specialists who supply the rail Introduction industry. Many of them are already helping HS2 Ltd chief executive Alison Munro us deliver Crossrail, Thameslink, electrifica- updates on the project’s progress tion, and upgrades to major stations like Reading and Birmingham. But even the 08 largest of these schemes will be dwarfed in Technical challenge size by HS2. So the challenge is for British Why the current London to West firms to develop the expertise to compete Midlands route is the best for key high speed contracts, and help deliver Britain’s Victorian engineering HS2 on time and on budget. 12 pioneers built a railway that was the The government’s National Infrastructure Euston envy of the world. Such was their Plan makes clear the importance of a predict- vision and singular focus that able and transparent pipeline of infrastruc- Expanding the station presents a ❝ following the opening of the first intercity line regeneration opportunity ture projects that will help the private sector between Manchester and Liverpool in 1830, it invest and plan for the future. HS2 will form 14 took just a little over two decades to construct a a key element of that long-term pipeline, Euston masterplan national rail network which linked all our major providing certainty about future contracting cities, and transformed our economy. Designs for Euston station opportunities following the Yet the modern reality is that since the terminus are vital to the project completion of Crossrail in 2017.
  • Prologis Park Birmingham Interchange Goes Above and Beyond What You’Ve Come to Expect from Traditional Industrial & Distribution Property

    Prologis Park Birmingham Interchange Goes Above and Beyond What You’Ve Come to Expect from Traditional Industrial & Distribution Property

    THE OPPORTUNITY DESIGNED TO REDEFINE Redefining the everyday, Prologis Park Birmingham Interchange goes above and beyond what you’ve come to expect from traditional industrial & distribution property. In addition to stunning, sophisticated working environments with carefully considered and highly crafted details, these landmark buildings take effortless to the next level, providing added excellent local amenities and outstanding connectivity to both UK and international locations. Pushing boundaries and exceeding expectations, this is where form and function works. FEATURES & BENEFITS ALL THINGS CONSIDERED Prologis Park Birmingham Interchange is a speculative development of 310,000 sq ft on 16 acres in an established commercial location, providing the very best industrial & distribution opportunities in the West Midlands. New Grade ‘A’ industrial & An established location, Flexible space available from distribution space with with local occupiers that include 76,975 sq ft – 233,025 sq ft headquarters style specification. Jaguar Land Rover and Rolls-Royce. (7,151 sq m – 21,648 sq m). Rare availability in a Only a 3 minute drive to Outstanding, modern highly sought after east Birmingham Airport. headquarters style office Birmingham location. accommodation. A superb work / life balance Innovation brought to you by the Fully funded with buildings with an abundance of amenities UK’s leading developer and owner of available autumn 2018. available on your doorstep. logistics property – Prologis. Up to 15m Major catchment area with In close proximity
  • High Speed Rail 2 (Phase Two) in Staffordshire Response to The

    High Speed Rail 2 (Phase Two) in Staffordshire Response to The

    High Speed Rail 2 (Phase Two) in Staffordshire Response to the Phase Two Route Consultation CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 QUESTION ONE ......................................................................................................................... 2 QUESTION TWO ...................................................................................................................... 17 QUESTION THREE .................................................................................................................. 19 QUESTION FOUR .................................................................................................................... 23 QUESTION FIVE ....................................................................................................................... 24 QUESTION SIX ......................................................................................................................... 25 QUESTION SEVEN .................................................................................................................. 26 QUESTION EIGHT .................................................................................................................... 33 QUESTION NINE ...................................................................................................................... 36 High Speed Rail 2 in Staffordshire Route Consultation Response Phase Two INTRODUCTION This is a joint response
  • High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update

    High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update

    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts High Speed 2: Spring 2020 update Third Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 May 2020 HC 84 Published on 17 May 2020 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Dame Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Sir Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham, Ladywood) Gagan Mohindra MP (Conservative, South West Hertfordshire) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020.
  • Proposed Local Area Plan for the Hs2 Interchange

    Proposed Local Area Plan for the Hs2 Interchange

    PROPOSED LOCAL AREA PLAN FOR THE HS2 INTERCHANGE & ADJOINING AREA INITIAL (REGULATION 18) CONSULTATION November 2014 This page is left intentionally blank CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 DUTY TO COOPERATE 4 3 FOCUS ON THE HS2 INTERCHANGE AND ADJOINING AREA 5 4 VISION 7 5 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 10 6 EVIDENCE 14 7 DELIVERY 16 8 PROGRAMME FOR THE LOCAL AREA PLAN 17 9 CONSULTATION QUESTIONS 18 This page is left intentionally blank 1. Introduction 1.1 Solihull Local Plan 2013 1.1.1 The Council has a statutory duty to prepare and review a local plan for its area, to address the spatial implications of economic, social and environmental change. A local plan can be reviewed in whole or in part to enable the Council to respond flexibly to changing circumstances. It must be prepared with the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable development. 1.1.2 The Solihull Local Plan was adopted in December 2013 and covers the period 2011 to 2028. Since the Local Plan was adopted a legal challenge has been heard and the judgment handed down in May 2014 requiring the parts of the Local Plan relating to the overall housing requirement and the safeguarded land in Tidbury Green to be remitted to the Planning Inspectorate for re-examination. In July 2014, the Council was given leave to appeal this judgment and the appeal is likely to be heard in November 2014. In the interim, the Council has agreed a policy position statement relating to the housing requirement for the Borough. 1.1.3 The remainder of the Local Plan 2013 is unaffected by this legal challenge and appeal and remains the adopted plan for Solihull.
  • Data Label: Public Development and Transport Policy Development & Scrutiny Panel Rail Developments in West Lothian Report By

    Data Label: Public Development and Transport Policy Development & Scrutiny Panel Rail Developments in West Lothian Report By

    DATA LABEL: PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORT POLICY DEVELOPMENT & SCRUTINY PANEL RAIL DEVELOPMENTS IN WEST LOTHIAN REPORT BY HEAD OF OPERATION SERVICES A. PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to advise the Panel of future railway developments in West Lothian and beyond including a new Winchburgh Station, the Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Project (EGIP) and High Speed Rail. B. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Panel notes the: - 1) rephasing of the Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Project to defer some of the previously announced interventions until later in Network Rail’s Control Period Five (2014 – 2019); 2) progress made towards developing a business case for a new Winchburgh station; and 3) opportunities that future High Speed Rail developments may provide for new services and connections in West Lothian. C. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS I Council Values Focusing on our customers' needs; Making best use of our resources; and Working in partnership. II Policy and Legal (including Strategic Environmental Assessment, Equality None Issues, Health or Risk Assessment) III Implications for Scheme of None Delegations to Officers IV Impact on performance and None performance Indicators V Relevance to Single We make West Lothian an attractive place for Outcome Agreement doing business. 1 DATA LABEL: PUBLIC We realise our full economic potential with more and better employment. VI Resources - (Financial, None Staffing and Property) VII Consideration at PDSP Not applicable VIII Other consultations Consultation has taken place with Economic Development, Planning Services and SEStran D. TERMS OF REPORT Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Project (EGIP) The EGIP project was designed by Transport Scotland to increase capacity, reduce journey times and reduce the carbon footprint on the flagship Edinburgh – Glasgow via Falkirk High route.
  • High Speed Two: Engine for Growth Clinton Leeks Director of External and Parliamentary Relations, HS2 Ltd the Vision for HS2: the Catalyst for High‐Speed Britain

    High Speed Two: Engine for Growth Clinton Leeks Director of External and Parliamentary Relations, HS2 Ltd the Vision for HS2: the Catalyst for High‐Speed Britain

    High Speed Two: Engine for Growth Clinton Leeks Director of External and Parliamentary Relations, HS2 Ltd The vision for HS2: the catalyst for high‐speed Britain •A 21st century high speed rail backbone, integrated with existing network •Direct, high capacity, rail links between our major cities •Foundation for future growth and prosperity • Investment in infrastructure that will deliver a lasting dividend • Delivered in two phases • Study to reduce journey times to Scotland The need for HS2 •Over recent years rail travel has been experiencing “The Government's plans for High Speed a massive growth –spare capacity is being used up Two will significantly •In 2011/12 passengers made around 1.5 billion improve rail services at journeys, a figure which has almost doubled since Milton Keynes –one of the busiest stations on 1994/95 the West Coast Main •125 million long distance journeys were made in Line.” 2011/12, more than double the 54 million made in 1994/95 ‐ Network Rail •By mid 2020’s key routes will be severely crowded Addressing the capacity crunch •The HS2 network will provide high frequency and high capacity services for passengers. •Up to 18 trains per hour, each carrying up to 1,100 passengers. • Capacity will be freed up on the existing network, key commuter stations such as Milton Keynes and Northampton could see twice as many direct services to central London •HS2 will see up to 5.4 million passengers every year to transfer from air travel, as well as seeing up to 9.8 million passengers transfer from the road networks •More freight