DOCSLIB.ORG

Delivering High Speed 2 Major Project Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delivering High Speed 2 Major Project Report DELIVERING HIGH SPEED 2 MAJOR PROJECT REPORT New rail reality Developing a £33bn rail network to transform Uk’s north-soUth 03|2012 CONNECTIONS Special report | High Speed 2 03 | 2012 Foreword 04 infrastructure specialists who supply the rail Introduction industry. Many of them are already helping HS2 Ltd chief executive Alison Munro us deliver Crossrail, Thameslink, electrifica- updates on the project’s progress tion, and upgrades to major stations like Reading and Birmingham. But even the 08 largest of these schemes will be dwarfed in Technical challenge size by HS2. So the challenge is for British Why the current London to West firms to develop the expertise to compete Midlands route is the best for key high speed contracts, and help deliver Britain’s Victorian engineering HS2 on time and on budget. 12 pioneers built a railway that was the The government’s National Infrastructure Euston envy of the world. Such was their Plan makes clear the importance of a predict- vision and singular focus that able and transparent pipeline of infrastruc- Expanding the station presents a ❝ following the opening of the first intercity line regeneration opportunity ture projects that will help the private sector between Manchester and Liverpool in 1830, it invest and plan for the future. HS2 will form 14 took just a little over two decades to construct a a key element of that long-term pipeline, Euston masterplan national rail network which linked all our major providing certainty about future contracting cities, and transformed our economy. Designs for Euston station opportunities following the Yet the modern reality is that since the terminus are vital to the project completion of Crossrail in 2017. coming of the motorways more than 50 To ensure that the UK-based supply chain 16 years ago, we have failed to grasp the nettle is in a position to benefit as far as possible London Metropolitan on decisions that will help us achieve our from this project, the government will open long term aspirations. We can’t simply hope Taking the route out of the capital a dialogue with potential suppliers to ensure for a better and more prosperous future – through a twin bore tunnel they are well-placed to bid competitively. I this Government passionately believes we want to put our best minds to work on high 20 will have to build it, just as the Victorians did. speed, and to find uniquely British solu- Country South If we want our economy to flourish once tions to the challenges we face. I also want again, I strongly believe that we need an The route through Buckinghamshire Britain to become a centre of excellence innovative and ambitious response to the and the Chilterns for high speed technologies and services, transport problems we face. In particular, we with a world-class R&D capability. Although 22 must tackle overcrowding on our railway, and at times we will have to collaborate with Country North meet rapidly growing demand for intercity companies from other countries, from the rail travel. Overground across the very start our priority must be to develop Investing in our current railway network is South Midlands the home-grown skills that will not only help vital, but the scope for squeezing ever more build HS2 – but that can be used in other 26 capacity out of our ageing network is dimin- markets as high speed rail is increasingly ishing. That is why in January, after analys- adopted by countries around the globe. Birmingham ing almost 55,000 responses to our public This is an exciting time for everyone in the Route into the second city and consultation, I announced the go-ahead for railway industry. After decades of decline, the connection to the North High Speed 2 (HS2): a new national high it is time to raise our sights, and show that 28 speed railway that will transform links across Britain has the ambition and capability to the country, and provide a legacy of jobs and deliver a world class railway programme for Profile growth for generations to come. the 21st century. HS2 Ltd chairman Sir Brian Briscoe on HS2 will also offer an historic opportu- Rt Hon Justine Greening MP, the role of public consultation design nity for the engineering, technology and Secretary of State for Transport NCE March 2012 3 Special report | High Speed 2 3 | 2012 Getting ECONOMIC BENEFITS £47-59bn 60% 40,000 ready Expected return to the Expected proportion of Estimated number of jobs NEEDS WRITE TO FIT. economy from the full HS2 overall HS2 benefits from that phase 1 of HS2 could BOX 1 and TIMELINE network as calculated by the trips that start outside support in the areas served for take off government London by the new line Introduction Interchange with Leeds Interchange with HS2 phase 1 routes North routes North HS2 phase 2 South by Antony Oliver to Glasgow to Newcastle HS1 Yorkshire and Edinburgh Existing track Liverpool East Midlands Crossrail Manchester station High Speed two Ltd And while the speed of getting the (HS2 Ltd) chief High Speed 2 (HS2) project to this stage may be somewhat surreal, the Birmingham Birmingham Int. executive alison Munro scale of the challenge facing Munro Curzon Street has been leading the and her team as they guide the fi rst London Birmingham St. Pancras team since 2009 and is London to West Midlands section Interchange HS1 links with through planning and towards start of now reshaping the Old Oak Common Ashford Europe: Amsterdam, construction in 2017 is very much a Interchange with Brussells, Paris Heathrow £33bn project ready for daunting reality. Crossrail and HS1 “The role is changing from advising its next phase following London Folkestone government to having a more specifi c the government’s Euston brief to promote the project,” she decision to press ahead explains. “Now that we have the in January. go-ahead, we can now go out and make the case for HS2. But the scale of what we’re currently doing is of a TIME SAVINGS When experienced senior civil servant diff erent magnitude.” Journey Time with HS2 Current Saving Alison Munro was asked in 2009 to As will be the breadth of skills Birmingham to London 45 mins 1 hr 24 mins 39 mins lead a small team on a one year required. As a result, Munro’s fi rst task project to prepare a report into the has been to reorganise project Manchester to London 1 hr 08 mins 2 hrs 8 mins 1 hr feasibility of new high speed rail lines promoter HS2 Ltd and bring on board Leeds to London 1 hr 24 mins 2 hrs 20 mins 56 mins in the UK, the subject was barely on new individuals and teams capable of the political landscape. driving the project through the hybrid Glasgow/Edinburgh to London approx. 3 hrs 30 mins 4 hrs 30 mins 1 hr Just over three years later the Birmingham to Leeds 57 mins 2 hrs 1 hr 3 mins programme is not only still running but now has morphed into a realistic “now that we have the Birmingham to Manchester 41 mins 1 hr 30 mins 49 mins proposition with cross party political go-ahead, we can now make Birmingham to Brussels/Paris approx. 3 hrs 4 hrs 1 hr support and a positive decision by the the case for High Speed two” Leeds/Manchester to Brussels/Paris 3 hs 30 mins 4 hrs 30 mins 1 hr secretary of state to proceed. It is, she Alison Munro, HS2 Ltd says, a really satisfying achievement. infographic: © www.paulweston.info TIMELINEHS2 - PHASE 1 PROGRAMME HS2 - PHASE 2 PROGRAMME January 2012 Spring 2012 Spring 2013 2015 Spring 2012 Early 2014 Go ahead for London to Engagement programme on phase 1 Consultation on Environmental Target for Royal Assent for the hybrid Government receives HS2 Ltd Consultation on preferred route West Midlands hybrid bill on Environmental Impact Assessment Statement for phase 1 bill, legal powers to build HS2 advice on phase 2 route options 2025 and Y network to Leeds and Autumn 2012 End of 2013 2017-2025 Construction Autumn 2012 Manchester Construction starts New blight scheme and Introduction of a hybrid bill to provide 2026 Preferred route published Spring 2012 2032 safeguarding zone in place powers to construct and operate phase 1 Line opens to passengers Public consultation on blight Complete HS2 opens to passengers 04 NCE March 2012 Special report | High Speed 2 3 | 2012 ECONOMIC BENEFITS WHat’s HappeNiNG WHeN High Speed 2 will be planned and constructed in two This phase will include four high speed rail stations – initial phases as part of an overall long-term plan to in central London at Euston, Old Oak Common in West £47-59bn 60% 40,000 create a so-called “Y-shaped” high speed rail network London, Birmingham Airport Interchange and central Expected return to the Expected proportion of Estimated number of jobs across the entire country. Birmingham at Curzon Street. economy from the full HS2 overall HS2 benefits from that phase 1 of HS2 could NEEDS WRITE TO FIT. Government approval to proceed toward with the Y PHASE 2: Expected to open 2032/33 and providing network as calculated by the trips that start outside support in the areas served BOX 1 and TIMELINE network extension from London to Birmingham and on dedicated high speed services beyond the West government London by the new line to Manchester and Leeds was given in January 2012. Midlands to Manchester and Leeds with direct high speed services to Heathrow Airport. High speed PHASE 1: Expected to open in 2026 with dedicated high trains will also continue onto the existing network at speed services between London and the West Midlands.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport
    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport 30 August 2017 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Department for Transport’s information and use in relation to Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Business Case. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 108 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5159267 Document ref: v4.0 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Interim draft for client Rev 1.0 - 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft for client Rev 2.0 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft addressing Rev 3.0 - 22/08/2017 client comment Rev 4.0 Final 30/08/2017 Client signoff Client Department for Transport Project Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Document title Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme: KO1 Final Business Case Job no. 5159267 Copy no. Document reference Atkins Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme | Version 4.0 | 30 August 2017 | 5159267 2 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 12 1.1. Background 12 1.2. Report Structure 13 2. Scope of the Appraisal 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Scenario Development 14 3. Timetable Development 18 3.1. Overview 18 4. Demand & Revenue Forecasting 26 4.1. Introduction 26 4.2. Forecasting methodology 26 4.3. Appraisal of Benefits 29 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead?
    High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead? The UK government has given the “green light” to the High Speed Two (HS2) rail project in its entirety, following the outcome of the Oakervee Review, ending months of speculation over the future of the scheme. Phase 2b of the project, linking Crewe to Manchester and Birmingham to Leeds via Sheffield, is subject to further review. It now forms part of an ambitious “High Speed North” integrated masterplan, including Northern Powerhouse Rail and other local rail improvements. What will this mean for landowners, occupiers and others who are directly affected by the HS2 scheme? Time will tell. However, the announcement is likely to be welcomed, as it provides certainty that the project will now proceed, although concerns over the long-term plans for delivery of Phase 2b will persist. HS2 Limited’s remit will be to “…focus solely on getting On all fronts, the government’s announcement gives phases 1 and 2A built on something approaching on time grounds for optimism. The government has pledged to learn and on budget” and, in respect of Phase 2b, new “delivery lessons from Phase 1 and improve how the project is being arrangements” will be put in place, but not before “…an delivered, highlighting the need for better communication and integrated plan for rail in the north” has been introduced. engagement with local communities impacted by the scheme. Grand plans no doubt, but close attention will be paid to the detail, including the enabling legislation required to deliver Major concerns will also remain over the delivery of the Phase 2a of the project and future plans for the design and scheme, including timescales for completion of each phase, delivery arrangements for Phase 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015
    Crossrail 2 factsheet: Services between Berrylands and Hampton Court New Crossrail 2 services are proposed to serve all stations between Berrylands and Hampton Court, with 4 trains per hour in each direction operating directly to, and across central London. What is Crossrail 2? Crossrail 2 in this area Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway serving London and the wider South East that could be open by 2030. It would connect the existing National Rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire with trains running through a new tunnel from Wimbledon to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate. Crossrail 2 will connect directly with National Rail, London Underground, London Overground, Crossrail 1, High Speed 1 international and domestic and High Speed 2 services, meaning passengers will be one change away from over 800 destinations nationwide. Why do we need Crossrail 2? The South West Main Line is one of the busiest and most congested routes in the country. It already faces capacity constraints and demand for National Rail services into Waterloo is forecast to increase by at least 40% by 2043. This means the severe crowding on the network will nearly double, and would likely lead to passengers being unable to board trains at some stations. Crossrail 2 provides a solution. It would free up space on the railway helping to reduce congestion, and would enable us to run more local services to central London that bypass the most congested stations. Transport improvements already underway will help offset the pressure in the short term. But we need Crossrail 2 to cope with longer term growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Case for High Speed 2
    Management Case for High Speed 2 1 Contents Introduction 4 Timetable to an operational railway 5 Governance 7 Planning 16 Risk Management 17 Issue Management 18 Change Control 19 Assurance 24 Benefit Realisation and Evaluation 25 Communication and Stakeholder Management 26 Building Capability and Capacity 28 Document Control 30 Annex A – Governance Framework for High Speed 2 31 Annex B – Remit letter 32 Annex C – DfT High Speed Rail Organogram 36 Annex D – HS2 Ltd Organogram 37 Annex E – Risk and Issue Management Strategy 38 Annex F - Integrated Assurance and Approvals Plan 53 Annex G – Benefit Realisation and Evaluation Strategy 73 Annex H - Communications Plan 84 Annex I – Resource Management Plan 111 2 Purpose 1. The purpose of the Management Case is to provide confidence that credible and robust arrangements are in place to deliver the High Speed 2 (HS2) programme to time, cost and quality. It includes: . an outline of the HS2 programme and how it will be delivered; . governance arrangements for the programme, including the role of the High Speed Rail Programme Board, the separate Project Boards and HS2 Ltd’s own governance; . details on the programme of work planned and how key milestones are tracked; . evidence on how risks and issues are managed and escalated; . detail on how change is and will be managed within the programme; . arrangements for programme and project assurance; . our communication plan for the programme, including how we engage with stakeholders; . how we plan to manage and record the benefits from the programme; . contingency and resource planning arrangements; and . document control arrangements. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Two Limited
    High Speed Two Limited High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) High Speed Two Limited H igh Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) March 2011 This r eport t akes i nto a ccount t he particular instructions and requirements of our client. It i s not i ntended f or a nd s hould n ot be relied u pon b y any third p arty a nd no responsibility i s u ndertaken to any t hird Ove Arup & Partners Ltd party The Arup Campus, Blythe Gate, Blythe Valley Park, Solihull, West Midlands. B90 8AE Tel +44 (0)121 213 3000 Fax +44 (0)121 213 3001 www.arup.com Job number High Speed Two (HS2) High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The December 2009 Report 1 1.2 Layout of this Report 1 2 Scope of Work, Methodology and Deliverables 2 2.1 Scope of Work 2 2.2 Meeting 1 2 2.3 Intermediate instructions 3 2.4 Meeting 2 3 3 Current Rail Operations and Future Developments 4 3.1 Context 4 3.2 Oxford - Bletchley 4 3.3 Aylesbury – Claydon Line 4 3.4 High Speed 2 5 3.5 Evergreen 3 5 3.6 East West Project 5 4 Functional Requirements 6 5 Site Location Options 7 5.1 Introduction 7 5.2 Quadrant 1 9 5.3 Quadrant 2 11 5.4 Quadrant 3 15 5.5 Quadrant 4 17 5.6 Sites on HS2 (north) 18 6 Cost Estimates 20 6.1 Matrix table for all Site options 20 7 Conclusion 21 8 Selected Option Development 23 8.1 General layout 23 8.2 Specific site details 27 8.3 Site operation 28 8.4 West end connections 29 9 Calvert Waste Plant 30 9.1 Rail Access 30 9.2 Heat and power generation 32 10 Use of site as a potential construction depot 33
    [Show full text]
  • Silvertown Crossrail Station
    Challenges Lessons Learned Policy. Ensuring that the message, delivery of the The project is still at an early stage and stakeholder station post Crossrail and demonstrating that the support and momentum will be the key. The impacts on the operational railway line, is clear stakeholder support will come in the form of to ensure that the support of the policy makers placing the station in the upcoming policy docu- and provide the project with a strong supporting ments, the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, London position. Plan and London Borough of Newham’s local plans Silvertown crossrail and polies update. To ensure that the station can Design. Incorporating the station into the local be supported in policy the momentum of dialogue area and demonstrating how it enables it to thrive and supporting technical work is essential. station and create an interchange for passengers to ensure the local residential and business can see the To become a Major East London transport hub London City Airport needs to create an interchange for benefits the station could bring. international, national and local travel for people in London and the South-East. The Silvertown Crossrail station supports the airport travellers through the creation of new Mayor’s vision for strategic growth by maximising visitor destinations, providing retail and leisure the regeneration potential of the Royal Docks Area opportunities, particularly at Royal Victoria and as well as providing faster links to key London at Silvertown Quays. The introduction of a station employment areas, and unlocking more land for close to the airport would achieve similar results homes and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Euston Stations Masterplan December 2017
    Euston Stations Masterplan December 2017 Euston Stations Masterplan 1DC03-WSP-AR-REP-SS06_SL09-000016 P04 Contents Executive Summary 10 Part C - Constraints and Considerations 5 Surface Transport and Interchange Sub-Variables Study 86 5.1 Overview 86 1 Introduction 24 1 Planning Policy and London Plan 68 5.2 Concourse and People Movement 86 1.1 Masterplan Overview 24 1.1 Planning Policy Summary 68 5.3 Crossrail 2 / London Underground 87 1.2 Purpose of Report 25 1.2 High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Act 2017 68 5.4 Bus Strategy 88 1.3 Definitions 26 2 Constraints and Considerations 69 5.5 Taxi Strategy 89 Part A - Brief and Context 2.1 Overview 69 5.6 Cycle Strategy 89 1 Brief 30 2.2 Below Ground Constraints 69 5.7 Summary and Next Steps 89 1.1 Overview 30 2.3 Above Ground Constraints 70 Part E - The Masterplan 1.2 Landowners 30 2.4 Intermodal Considerations 71 1.3 Stakeholder Engagement 30 1 The Masterplan 92 Part D - Masterplan Process 1.4 Five Key Principles 31 1.1 Overview 92 1.5 Euston OSD enabling Outline Business Case 31 1 Opportunities 76 1.2 A Flexible Masterplan 97 1.1 Overview 76 2 Context 32 1.2 The Opportunities 76 2 Development 98 2.1 Overview 32 1.3 Public Realm 78 2.1 Overview 98 2.2 Site Context 32 1.4 Linkages and Connections 78 2.2 Land Uses 98 2.3 Surrounding Neighbourhoods 37 1.5 Heritage and Culture 78 2.3 Area provision 98 2.4 History of Euston 38 1.6 Development Opportunities 79 2.4 Development Massing 99 2.5 Current Proposals 40 1.7 Intermodal Interchange and Surface Strategies 79 Part B - Masterplan Vision
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity on North-South Main Lines
    Capacity on North-South Main Lines Technical Report Report October 2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: Department for Transport Steer Davies Gleave Click here to enter text. 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Technical Report CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... I 1 CREATING THE TIMETABLES THAT DETERMINE CAPACITY PROVISION IS A COMPLEX ISSUE .................................................................................................. 1 2 EUROPEAN COMPARISONS ........................................................................ 5 3 HOW CAPACITY CAN BE MEASURED ............................................................ 7 4 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES ..................................................................... 9 5 CAPACITY AND THE NORTH-SOUTH ROUTES ................................................ 11 West Coast Main Line .............................................................................. 11 Midland Main Line .................................................................................. 13 East Coast Main Line ............................................................................... 14 Route section categorisation: green/orange/red ............................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 5.1 Assessed post-2019 Capacity Pressures on North-South Main Lines 19 Contents Technical Report Summary 1. This note assesses the capacity of the North-South Rail Lines in the UK from the perspective
    [Show full text]
  • Prologis Park Birmingham Interchange Goes Above and Beyond What You’Ve Come to Expect from Traditional Industrial & Distribution Property
    THE OPPORTUNITY DESIGNED TO REDEFINE Redefining the everyday, Prologis Park Birmingham Interchange goes above and beyond what you’ve come to expect from traditional industrial & distribution property. In addition to stunning, sophisticated working environments with carefully considered and highly crafted details, these landmark buildings take effortless to the next level, providing added excellent local amenities and outstanding connectivity to both UK and international locations. Pushing boundaries and exceeding expectations, this is where form and function works. FEATURES & BENEFITS ALL THINGS CONSIDERED Prologis Park Birmingham Interchange is a speculative development of 310,000 sq ft on 16 acres in an established commercial location, providing the very best industrial & distribution opportunities in the West Midlands. New Grade ‘A’ industrial & An established location, Flexible space available from distribution space with with local occupiers that include 76,975 sq ft – 233,025 sq ft headquarters style specification. Jaguar Land Rover and Rolls-Royce. (7,151 sq m – 21,648 sq m). Rare availability in a Only a 3 minute drive to Outstanding, modern highly sought after east Birmingham Airport. headquarters style office Birmingham location. accommodation. A superb work / life balance Innovation brought to you by the Fully funded with buildings with an abundance of amenities UK’s leading developer and owner of available autumn 2018. available on your doorstep. logistics property – Prologis. Up to 15m Major catchment area with In close proximity
    [Show full text]
  • Going, Going … Urban Geology at the End of an Era at Euston Station
    Urban Geology in London No. 27 Going, going … Urban Geology at the end of an era at Euston Station In the next few years, Euston Station will be, in planning strategy parlance, ‘regenerated’, and already the hoardings are going up. This will update the current, tired old 1960s buildings and make space for the coming of the locally much-despised HS2 link to the north of England. In the meantime, this guide is an opportunity to look at the surprisingly interesting urban geology of the area around the station. Catch it quick, it won’t be there for long. The original Euston Station was built in the late 1830s by railway engineer Robert Stevenson along with architects William Cubitt, Philip Hardwick and his son, P.C. Hardwick. This station was demolished in 1961- 2, to make way for a much larger building, serving trains to Scotland, north-west England and North Wales. This was not without protest; the infamous Euston Arch was also destroyed at the time and many fought for the preservation of this icon of early Victorian architecture. Its destruction heightened debate on the edifices of Britain’s industrial past that were being swept away in the name of modernism. The current station, which opened in 1968 was constructed by Taylor Woodrow Construction, with the plaza and surrounding offices designed by Seifert & Partners were built during the 1970s. The architecture, both past and present is described in Pevsner (Cherry & Pevsner, 1998) and in Stamp (2010). The latter book also contains restored photographs of the old station’s exteriors and interiors.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into the Department for Transport's Decision to Cancel Three
    A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Transport Investigation into the Department for Transport’s decision to cancel three rail electrification projects HC 835 SESSION 2017–2019 29 MARCH 2018 4 What this investigation is about Investigation into the Department for Transport’s decision to cancel three rail electrification projects What this investigation is about 1 In July 2017 the Secretary of State for Transport announced the cancellation of three electrification projects serving different parts of the UK: the Midland Main Line north of Kettering (to Nottingham and Sheffield); the Great Western Main Line between Cardiff and Swansea; and the Lakes Line between Oxenholme and Windermere. Electrification of the Midland Main Line to Sheffield was a 2015 Conservative party manifesto commitment. The 2015 manifesto also stated that work was underway to electrify the railway in South Wales. These three projects are part of wider electrification projects for which works are either ongoing or already complete for large sections of these lines (Figure 1). 2 This investigation sets out the decision-making process, leading to the July 2017 announcement. It covers: • the original case for electrification; • why the Department for Transport (the Department) chose to cancel projects; • how it selected which projects to cancel; and • the Department’s assessment on the impact that cancelling the projects would have on promised benefits. 3 This investigation focuses on the three electrification projects the Secretary of State announced as cancelled in July 2017. Our investigation does not seek to evaluate the value for money of the projects or the decision to cancel.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts High Speed 2: Spring 2020 update Third Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 May 2020 HC 84 Published on 17 May 2020 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Dame Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Sir Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham, Ladywood) Gagan Mohindra MP (Conservative, South West Hertfordshire) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020.
    [Show full text]