DOCSLIB.ORG

Peel Sustainable Transportation Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peel Sustainable Transportation Strategy Background Documents Sustainable Transportation Strategy February 2018 Region of Peel Sustainable Transportation Strategy Online Consultation Survey Summary Shaping the Vision for Sustainable Transportation in the Region of Peel Prepared for Region of Peel by IBI Group May 19, 2017 IBI GROUP REGION OF PEEL SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY ONLINE CONSULTATION SURVEY SUMMARY Prepared for Region of Peel Table of Contents List of Exhibits .............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Survey Objective and Design ............................................................................................ 2 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Design ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Promotion ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Survey Responses .............................................................................................................. 3 3 Respondent Demographics ............................................................................................... 4 3.1 Priority Ranking ........................................................................................................ 8 4 Strategy Rating ................................................................................................................... 9 4.1.1 Transit ....................................................................................................... 11 4.1.2 Cycling ...................................................................................................... 12 4.1.3 Travel Efficiency ........................................................................................ 13 4.1.4 Flexible Work Options ............................................................................... 14 4.1.5 Walking ..................................................................................................... 15 4.1.6 Travel Innovations ..................................................................................... 16 4.1.7 Carpooling ................................................................................................. 17 5 Map Markers: Existing Problems and Opportunities .................................................... 18 6 Key Findings and Conclusion ......................................................................................... 27 Appendix A – Survey Questions and Layout ........................................................................... 28 Appendix B – Map Marker Comments ........................................................................................ 1 May 19, 2017 i IBI GROUP REGION OF PEEL SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY ONLINE CONSULTATION SURVEY SUMMARY Prepared for Region of Peel List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Online survey visitors by date ............................................................................... 4 Exhibit 2: Respondent area of residence ............................................................................. 4 Exhibit 3: Respondent age split ........................................................................................... 5 Exhibit 4: Primary mode of travel ......................................................................................... 5 Exhibit 5: Reasons for primary mode choice ....................................................................... 6 Exhibit 6: Other regular travel modes of respondents ......................................................... 7 Exhibit 7: Priority ranking results .......................................................................................... 8 Exhibit 8 Strategy Rating and Score .............................................................................. 10 Exhibit 9: Transit Strategy Rating Results ......................................................................... 11 Exhibit 10: Cycling – Strategy rating results ...................................................................... 12 Exhibit 11: Travel Efficiency – Strategy rating results........................................................ 13 Exhibit 12: Flexible Work Options – Strategy rating results ............................................... 14 Exhibit 13: Walking – Strategy rating results ..................................................................... 15 Exhibit 14: Travel Innovations – Strategy rating results..................................................... 16 Exhibit 15: Carpooling – Strategy rating results ................................................................. 17 Exhibit 16: Problems and Improvements for all map markers ........................................... 18 Exhibit 17: Count of Map Markers by Mode and Category ................................................ 19 Exhibit 18: Walking Map Marker Comments ...................................................................... 21 Exhibit 19: Cycling Map Marker Comments ....................................................................... 22 Exhibit 20: Local Transit Map Marker Comments .............................................................. 23 Exhibit 21: GO Transit Map Marker Comments ................................................................. 24 Exhibit 22: Carpooling Map Marker Comments ................................................................. 25 Exhibit 23: Other Map Marker Comments ......................................................................... 26 May 19, 2017 1 IBI GROUP REGION OF PEEL SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY ONLINE CONSULTATION SURVEY SUMMARY Prepared for Region of Peel 1 Survey Objective and Design 1.1 Objectives The Region of Peel is engaging residents to consider and support a greater adoption of more sustainable options for mobility, such as walking, cycling, transit, carpooling and teleworking. The Region is developing a Sustainable Transportation Strategy that will outline a vision and key themes and strategies to reduce the negative impacts of auto- dependency and congestion and increase the availability of safe and convenient travel choices for all member of the community. A key tool for gathering public input in the development of the STS is the online survey - delivered in conjunction with public information centres held in January 2017. The survey is meant to supplement in-person consultation for a broader reach of community input. The survey also allows for more detailed feedback on the proposed priorities and strategies in the STS. Survey participants have provided meaningful feedback that will inform the development of the priorities and implementation strategies in the STS. 1.2 Design The online survey is designed to present STS vision and themes and solicit feedback on the public’ preferred strategies for increasing sustainable modes of transportation in Peel. It is also an opportunity to collect detailed feedback on the obstacles and potential remedies that will make sustainable travel choices more convenient and accessible. After briefly introducing the STS, the survey presents seven priorities and a set of key strategies for each priority. The priorities and strategies were developed by the Region of Peel project team and IBI Group, and included feedback from stakeholder meetings with staff from the Region, area municipalities and transit agencies. The surveys is divided into three successive exercises designed to gain meaningful insight into the priorities, preferred strategies and needs of Peel residents. The three main survey components consist of exercises that ask: • Survey participants to rank their top 3-4 issues from a list of 7 priorities; • Rate their preference for potential strategies related to these priorities; and, • Add marker on a map to comment on specific problems and opportunities in their daily activities that could lead to improvement in sustainable travel modes in the Region. The survey concludes with a few questions about the participant’s demographics and travel behaviour. While the survey is not a representative sample of Peel residents, the high volume of responses provides a better understanding of challenges faced by residents of each Peel municipalities from a range of age groups and travel habits. The survey was implemented using the MetroQuest platform, an interactive public engagement tool that is web and mobile friendly. The visual interface makes it easy for users to complete the survey either on a desktop or mobile device. The tool is widely used for transportation engagement programs including recent projects in York Region, Mississauga and London, Ontario. A description of the survey questions and layout is included in Appendix A. May 19, 2017 2 IBI GROUP REGION OF PEEL SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY ONLINE CONSULTATION SURVEY SUMMARY Prepared for Region of Peel 1.3 Promotion The survey was promoted through a number of channels including: • A direct link to the MetroQuest survey was included on Letsmovepeel.ca, the Region’s website for the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), and the Sustainable Transportation Strategy; • On-site opportunities to complete the survey using iPads at 3 Public Information Centres (1 each in Brampton, Caledon, and Mississauga) in January 2017; • “Intercept’ surveys at MiWay City Centre Transit Terminal and Bramalea Transit Terminal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX 5 February 2013
    APPENDIX 5 February 2013 APPENDIX 5 APPENDIX 5-A Paper #5a Transit Service and Infrastructure Paper #5a TRANSIT SERVICE AND INFRASTRUCTURE This paper outlines public transit service within the Town of Oakville, identifies the role of public transit within the objectives of the Livable Oakville Plan and the North Oakville Secondary Plans, outlines the current transit initiatives and identifies future transit strategies and alternatives. This report provides an assessment of target transit modal share, the level of investment required to achieve these targets and the anticipated effectiveness of alternative transit investment strategies. This paper will provide strategic direction and recommendations for Oakville Transit, GO Transit and VIA Rail service, and identify opportunities to better integrate transit with other modes of transportation, such as walking and cycling, as well as providing for accessible services. 1.0 The Role of Transit in Oakville 1.1. Provincial Policy The Province of Ontario has provided direction to municipalities regarding growth and the relationship between growth and sustainable forms of travel including public transit. Transit is seen to play a key role in addressing the growth pressures faced by municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, including the Town of Oakville. In June 2006, the Province of Ontario released a Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The plan is a framework for implementing the Province’s vision for building stronger, prosperous communities by better managing growth in the region to 2031. The plan outlines strategies for managing growth with emphasis on reducing dependence on the automobile and “promotes transit, cycling and walking”. In addition, the plan establishes “urban growth centres” as locations for accommodating a significant share of population and employment growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 ONTARIO Budget for General Inquiries Regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, Please Call
    2018 ONTARIO BUDGE 2018 ONTARIO A PLAN FOR CARE AND OPPORTUNITY RX C. Lee RX T THE HONOURABLE CHARLES SOUSA MINISTER OF FINANCE 2018 ONTARIO BUDGET BUDGET PAPERS For general inquiries regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, please call: Toll-free English and French inquiries: 1-800-337-7222 Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-800-263-7776 For electronic copies of this document, visit our website at www.ontario.ca/budget A printed copy of this publication can be ordered: Online: www.serviceontario.ca/publications By phone: ServiceOntario Contact Centre (Monday to Friday, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) Telephone: 416-326-5300 TTY: 416-325-3408 Toll-free across Canada: 1-800-668-9938 TTY Toll-free across Ontario: 1-800-268-7095 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ISBN 978-1-4868-1883-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4868-1884-6 (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4868-1885-3 (PDF) Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre : Budget de l’Ontario 2018 – Documents budgétaires Foreword A Plan for Care and Opportunity Ontario’s economy is performing well. This is largely due to the businesses and entrepreneurs who create jobs and to the women and men who get up each morning to go to the plant, or the office, or another place of work to make Ontario a more prosperous province. At the same time, the government has made strategic investments to support growth. Enhanced education, skills and training, new infrastructure, a competitive business environment and support for startups and small businesses are helping create good jobs. On the surface, the numbers tell a positive story: Our economy has outperformed those of all G7 nations since 2014; Our unemployment rate, at 5.5 per cent, is the lowest it has been in almost 20 years; and Last year alone, 500 net new jobs were created, on average, each day in Ontario, and they were mostly full‐time.
    [Show full text]
  • Miway Service Changes Effective December 9, 2013: Date Posted: November 22, 2013
    MiWay Service Changes Effective December 9, 2013: Date Posted: November 22, 2013. Route 14 Lorne Park Weekday: The 5:43 am and 6:53 am westbound trips from Port Credit GO Station (STOP #0 3 1 4) will now depart at 5:40 am and 6:49 am, respectively. All westbound trips departing after 7:10 pm from Port Credit GO Station (STOP #0 3 1 4) will now depart five minutes later. The 6:26 am and 7:36 am eastbound trips from Clarkson GO Station (STOP #0 2 9 7) will now depart at 6:23 am and 7:32 am, respectively. All eastbound trips departing after 6:40 pm from Clarkson GO Station (STOP #0 2 9 7) will now depart five minutes later. Route 20 Rathburn Weekday: The 1:59 pm westbound trip from Islington Subway Station (STOP #1 6 3 2) will now depart at 2:00 pm. Route 24 Explorer Monday to Sunday: This route will now service the Airport Monorail Link Station. Visit miway.ca/terminalmaps for details. Route 38A Creditview-Argentia Sunday: Buses will depart stops every 45 minutes to match customer demand. Please visit miway.ca/schedules for new departure times. Route 39 Britannia Sunday: Buses will depart stops every 45 minutes to match customer demand. Please visit miway.ca/schedules for new departure times. Route 42 Derry Monday to Sunday: Weekday service frequencies have been improved. Buses will now depart stops every 13 minutes during the AM and PM rush hours and every 24 minutes during the midday. The 5:46 am Saturday eastbound trip from Meadowvale Town Centre (STOP #2 2 4 4) will now depart at 5:43 am to improve connections with Route 5 Dixie at Derry Road and Columbus Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority to Waive the City's Right to a Hearing of Necessity in Connection
    12.12 Date: July 16, 2020 Originator’s files: To: Chair and Members of Council From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works July 22, 2020 Subject Authority to Waive the City’s Right to a Hearing of Necessity in Connection with Metrolinx’s Expropriation of City Interests in Land for the Purpose of the Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Project (Ward 5) Recommendations 1. That the Corporate Report titled “Authority to Waive the City’s Right to a Hearing of Necessity in Connection with Metrolinx’s Expropriation of City Interests in Land for the Purpose of the Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Project (Ward 5)” dated July 16, 2020 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works, be received. 2. That the Legal Services Section of the City Manager’s Office be given authority to waive the City’s right to a Hearing of Necessity as provided pursuant to Section 6 (2) of the Expropriations Act, RSO. Background Under cover of letters dated April 21, 2020, the City of Mississauga received four (4) Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate (the “Notices”) from Metrolinx for the following interests in property required in connection with Metrolinx’s Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Project: 1. City’s easement interest in PIN132970628 2. City’s easement interest in PIN132970627 3. Fee simple interest in the City-owned lands identified as PIN74240245 4. Fee simple interest in the City-owned lands identified as PIN132970624. The location of these properties is illustrated in Appendix 1. 12.12 Council
    [Show full text]
  • Responsive Buildingsiwb INTERNATIONAL CHARRETTE Address 230 Richmond Street East, Toronto on M5A 1P4 Canada
    FEBRUARY 2014 RESPONSIVE BUILDINGSIwB INTERNATIONAL CHARRETTE ADDRESS 230 Richmond Street East, Toronto ON M5A 1P4 Canada MAILING ADDRESS Institute without Boundaries, School of Design, George Brown College P.O. Box 1015, Station B, Toronto ON M5T 2T9 Canada Tel.: +1.416.415.5000 x 2029 © 2014 THE INSTITUTE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES No part of this work may be produced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the publisher except for a brief quotation (not exceeding 200 words) in a review or professional work. WaRRANTIES The information in this document is for informational purposes only. While efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy and veracity of the informa- tion in this document, and, although the Institute without Boundaries at George Brown College relies on reputable sources and believes the informa- tion posted in this document is correct, the Institute without Boundaries at George Brown College does not warrant the quality, accuracy or complete- ness of any information in this document. Such information is provided “as is” without warranty or condition of any kind, either express or implied (including, but not limited to implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose), the Institute without Boundaries is not respon- sible in any way for damages (including but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special, or exemplary damages) arising out of the use of this document nor are liable for any inaccurate, delayed or incomplete information, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • 5700 Cancross Court Mississauga, Ontario
    5700 CANCROSS COURT MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO FOR LEASE Parking Ratio: OFFICE & WAREHOUSE SPACE 4.0 per 1,000 sq. ft. For More Information, Please Contact: Gary L. Williamson* Carley Williamson CBRE Limited Senior Vice President Sales Representative 2005 Sheppard Ave E T +1 416 495 6247 T +1 416 798 6276 Suite 800 [email protected] [email protected] Toronto, ON M2J 5B4 www.cbre.ca 5700 CANCROSS COURT MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO OFFICE & WAREHOUSE SPACE FOR LEASE AVAILABILITY (AVAILABLE MAY 2020) SUITE 1 3,305 sq. ft. SUITE 2 3,580 sq. ft. WAREHOUSE 3,574 sq. ft. SUITE 1 & WAREHOUSE 6,879 sq. ft. SUITE 2 & WAREHOUSE 7,154 sq. ft. SUITES 1 & 2 & WAREHOUSE 10,459 sq. ft. PROPERTY DETAILS NET RENT $11.00 per sq. ft. per annum ADDITIONAL RENT $13.11 per sq. ft. per annum (2020 estimate)1 Warehouse Space Has 1 Dock Door Bell, Rogers, Telus Available in Building 1Taxes are estimated based on 2020 assessment and 2020 Mississauga CT rates FLOOR PLAN SUITE 1 WAREHOUSE SUITE 2 3,305 sq. ft. 3,574 sq. ft. 3,3580 sq. ft. 5700 CANCROSS COURT MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO PROPERTYPROPERTY LOCATION LOCATION Route 19: Hurontario & 407 Park & Ride Platform (NB) to Port Credit Go Station Platform (SB) Route 43: Commerce Blvd at Renforth Station (EB) to Meadowvale Town Centre Drop Off (WB) Route 70: Islington Subway Bus Terminal Platform (EB) to Matheson Blvd W of Hurontario St (WB) Gary L. Williamson* Carley Williamson CBRE Limited Senior Vice President Sales Representative 2005 Sheppard Ave E T +1 416 495 6247 T +1 416 798 6276 Suite 800 [email protected] [email protected] Toronto, ON M2J 5B4 www.cbre.ca *Sales Representative February 2020.This disclaimer shall apply to CBRE Limited, Real Estate Brokerage, and to all other divisions of the Corporation; to include all employees and independent contractors (“CBRE”).
    [Show full text]
  • Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020
    Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Contents Executive Summary 1 Scope 1 Method of Analysis 1 Findings 3 Strategic Case 3 Economic Case 3 Financial Case 4 Deliverability and Operations Case 4 Summary 4 Introduction 7 Background 8 Business Case Overview 10 Problem Statement 13 Case for Change 14 Problem Statement 14 Opportunity for Change 15 Key Drivers 16 Strategic Value 18 iv Investment Options 24 Introduction 25 Study Area 25 Options Development 25 Options for Analysis 27 Assumptions for Analysis and Travel Demand Modelling 33 Strategic Case 34 Introduction 35 Strategic Objective 1 – Connect More Places with Better Frequent Rapid Transit 38 Criterion 1: To provide high quality transit to more people in more places 38 Criterion 2: To address the connectivity gap between Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Transitway BRT 40 Strategic Objective 2 – Improve Transit’s Convenience and Attractiveness 42 Criterion 2: To provide more reliable, safe and enjoyable travel experience 42 Criterion 2: To boost transit use and attractiveness among local residents and workers 45 Strategic Objective 3 – Promote Healthier and More Sustainable Travel Behaviours 52 Criterion 1: To improve liveability through reduction in traffic delays, auto dependency and air pollution 52 Criterion 2: To encourage use of active modes to access stations 53 v Strategic Objective 4 – Encourage Transit-Supportive Development 57 Criterion 1: Compatibility with Existing Neighbourhood
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Line South Environmental Project Report, Section 5 Existing and Future Conditions
    Relief Line South Environmental Project Report Section 5 - Existing and Future Conditions The study area is unique in that it is served by most transit modes that make up the Greater 5 Existing and Future Conditions Toronto Area’s (GTA’s) transit network, including: The description of the existing and future environment within the study area is presented in this • TTC Subway – High-speed, high-capacity rapid transit serving both long distance and local section to establish an inventory of the baseline conditions against which the potential impacts travel. of the project are being considered as part of the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP). • TTC Streetcar – Low-speed surface routes operating on fixed rail in mixed traffic lanes (with Existing transportation, natural, social-economic, cultural, and utility conditions are outlined some exceptions), mostly serving shorter-distance trips into the downtown core and feeding within this section. More detailed findings for each of the disciplines have been documented in to / from the subway system. the corresponding memoranda provided in the appendices. • TTC Conventional Bus – Low-speed surface routes operating in mixed traffic, mostly 5.1 Transportation serving local travel and feeding subway and GO stations. • TTC Express Bus – Higher-speed surface routes with less-frequent stops operating in An inventory of the existing local and regional transit, vehicular, cycling and pedestrian mixed traffic on high-capacity arterial roads, connecting neighbourhoods with poor access transportation networks in the study area is outlined below. to rapid transit to downtown. 5.1.1 Existing Transit Network • GO Rail - Interregional rapid transit primarily serving long-distance commuter travel to the downtown core (converging at Union Station).
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report 2016
    Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the efforts of former Metrolinx Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) members Mr. Sean Henry and Mr. Brian Moore, both of whom stepped down from the AAC in 2016. They provided valuable input into our accessibility planning efforts. We would like to welcome Mr. Gordon Ryall and Ms. Heather Willis, who both joined the Metrolinx AAC in 2015. Lastly, we would like to thank all of the Metrolinx AAC members for the important work they do as volunteers to improve the accessibility of our services. Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report: 2016 1. Introduction The 2016 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report provides an annual update of the Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan published in December 2012, as well as the 2015 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report. Metrolinx, a Crown agency of the Province of Ontario under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation, has three operating divisions: GO Transit, PRESTO and Union Pearson Express. This Status Report, in conjunction with the December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, fulfills Metrolinx’s legal obligations for 2016 under the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (ODA), to publish an annual accessibility plan; and also under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), to publish an annual status report on its multi-year plan. The December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and other accessibility planning documents can be referenced on the Metrolinx website at the following link: www.metrolinx.com/en/aboutus/accessibility/default.aspx. In accordance with the AODA, it must be updated every five years. Metrolinx, including its operating divisions, remains committed to proceeding with plans to ensure AODA compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • GO Transit Fare Increase
    Memorandum To: Metrolinx Board of Directors From: Greg Percy President, GO Transit Date: December 3, 2015 Re: Proposed GO Transit Fare Increase Executive Summary As part of the annual business plan process, an extensive review is undertaken of both operating expenses as well as other revenue opportunities to determine if a fare increase is warranted. Effective February 1, 2016, a GO Transit fare increase of approximately 5% is being recommended to meet the needs of our growing customer base and to ensure long term financial sustainability for the corporation. Staff are proposing to continue with a tiered fare increase approach, based on a four-tier system that exemplifies the fare-by-distance approach. Fares for short-distance trips would be frozen under this proposal. Base adult single fares would be increased as follows: Base Adult Single Fares Current Fare Increase Range $5.30 - $5.69 $0.00 $5.70 - $6.50 $0.40 $6.51 - $8.25 $0.50 > $8.25 $0.60 The discounts for the initial Adult PRESTO card fare would be increased from 10% to 11.15%. The discount on the initial PRESTO card fare for a student would increase from 17.25% to 18.40% while the discount on a senior fare would increase from 51.50% to 52.65%. The net result would be an approximate 5% effective rate of increase for the majority of our customers who use the PRESTO card. Additionally, PRESTO users will now pay less for short-distance trips due to the fact that the fares for these trips are not increasing while the initial discount for using PRESTO is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Strategy
    Town of Oakville Planning Department Town of Oakville - Transit Strategy Oakville, Ontario January 2010 Town of Oakville Planning Department Town of Oakville - Transit Strategy Oakville, Ontario January 2010 iTRANS Consulting Inc. 100 York Blvd., Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 Tel: (905) 882-4100 Fax: (905) 882-1557 www.itransconsulting.com Project # 5173 Town of Oakville Town of Oakville - Transit Strategy Client Project Team Project Manager Tricia Collingwood Project Team Joanne Phoenix iTRANS Project Team Principal / Project Manager Ray Bacquie, P.Eng., AVS. Technical Team Mark Mis, MBA Andrew Evans, MSc. Sherwin Gumbs, M.Eng., P.Eng. Tavia Chow Quality Control Wally Beck, C.E.T. January 2010 iTRANS Project # 5173 Town of Oakville Town of Oakville - Transit Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Existing Transit Mode Shares................................................................................ 3 2.1.1 Home-Work Transit Trips............................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Home-School Transit Trips........................................................................ 10 2.1.3 Home-Other Transit Trips.......................................................................... 15 2.2 Existing Population and Employment Density...................................................
    [Show full text]