DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrox: Hydrogen in Liquid Xenon Tpcs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrox: Hydrogen in Liquid Xenon Tpcs HydroX: Hydrogen in Liquid Xenon TPCs Maria Elena Monzani Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology Snowmass CF1 Meeting August 21, 2020 Dark Matter rates: low-mass vs high-mass To enhance low-mass sensitivity, we want: 1. lighter target for better kinematic matching to DM mass 2. lower the threshold as much as possible M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 2 Hydrogen doping in Liquid Xenon 1. Dissolve H2 in LXe 2. Look for recoiling proton Advantages: established low Advantages: kinematic matching background, plus Xe shielding. to light DM, lower threshold. M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 3 what are the expected S1 and S2 yields for He/Ne recoils in LXe? As described above, electrons deposit their energy into electronic excitations (electronic stopping) while xenon recoils in LXe deposit their energy into both electronic excitations and elastic collisions with nuclei (nuclear stopping). All the electronic energy is eventually collected as signal, but some of the energy given to nuclear recoils is lost as heat. Calculating the final electronic energy deposition from a xenon recoil is more complicated than simply taking the amount given directly from the primary recoil to Signalelectronic enhancement excitations, in H2 as+Xe secondary nuclei from the nuclear collisions in turn partition their energy into electronic and nuclear stopping. Lindhard theory [40] gives an approximation for the “Lindhard WIMP recoil off Xe: mfactor”,Xe = mXe → or energy the total lost to electronic heat (Lindhard energy) deposition from nuclear recoils relative to electronic recoils of • at low energies, <20%the sameobservable…and energy. Figurefalling! 7 shows a plot of the Lindhard factor vs. energy for xenon, and the signal produced by low energy xenon recoils is less than 20% that produced by ER of the same energy. Observable energy fraction after heat loss 0.25 Recoil Lindhard SRIM Xenon 0.02 0.02 0.2 Neon 0.20 0.09 Lindhard factor 0.15 Helium 0.68 0.69 0.1 0 1 10 10 Recoil energy [keV] Table 1: Estimated fraction of energy given to electronic stopping for nuclear recoils (not ac- Figure 7: Fraction of energy going into ob- counting for secondary cascades) from Xe, He, servable signal (Lindhard factor) vs. recoil and Ne recoils in LXe, calculated using Lindhard M.E. Monzani – HydroX energyCF1 Meeting, for August xenon 21, 2020 recoils in LXe. 4 theory [41] or the SRIM simulation package [42]. Because helium and neon are so much lighter than xenon, they will not lose as much energy in elastic collisions with xenon atoms, leaving more energy for electronic excitation and a corre- spondingly larger signal. Simple approximations for the Lindhard factor do not exist for nuclei moving through fluids composed of a di↵erent element, but one can estimate the raw stopping powers (before accounting for the secondary cascades) using either Lindhard theory [41] or the SRIM simulation package [42]. Table 1 shows the predicted amount of energy going directly from the primary recoil into electronic stopping from 5 keV Xe, He, and Ne recoils in LXe calculated via both methods. Neon and especially helium have a much larger fraction of energy deposited directly to electrons, i.e. directly into signal, without accounting for the secondary cascades that can only increase these fractions. It should be noted that the e↵ect of the cascades will be reduced for neon and helium because they will not efficiently transfer energy to the predominantly xenon atoms around them, leading to more sub-ionization energy depositions. Even so, one can expect larger signals (both charge and light) from helium and neon recoils in LXe than from xenon recoils, and a correspondingly lower energy threshold. The second key question is how will that increased signal be partitioned into S1 and S2; what happens to the S2/S1 ratio that is so important for rejecting electron recoil backgrounds in LZ? Given that the ratio is determined by track structures, and recoiling electrons will still be interacting with xenon atoms, the S2/S1 ratio for electrons should be unchanged. As it is not fully understood what drives the partitioning between S1 and S2 for xenon recoils in LXe, the most that can be said here is that He/Ne recoils will likely lie below the electron band shown in Fig. 4. As one example, in scintillating CaWO4 crystals operated by the CRESST dark matter experiment, oxygen recoils produce a light/heat ratio that lies between the electron and tungsten recoil bands [43]. One can 9 Signal enhancement in H2+Xe WIMP recoil off Xe: mXe = mXe → energy lost to heat (Lindhard) • at low energies, <20% observable…and falling! WIMP recoil off H2: mp ≪ mXe → all electronic excitations • ~100% of energy is observable M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 5 Xenon shielding in a large detector • Retain (self-) shielding properties of (a large mass of) LXe • Suppress external backgrounds like in a large-scale TPC • Plus: vetoes, water tank, intensive radio-cleanliness of LZ A kg-scale DM detector “embedded” in a ton-scale one! 103 102 101 0 Liquid H 10 2 Liquid xenon Interaction length [cm] 10-1 10-1 100 101 Gamma energy [MeV] M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 6 Feasibility Questions and Assumptions Can we get H2 in LXe? And how much? Is H2 safe for PMTs? • Originally considered He as dopant • 5% H2 fraction seems achievable • He can diffuse through PMT glass • Assume: 1% mol fraction, 1 kg in LZ • Larger H2 molecule slows diffusion • Can run safely for ~106 days M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 7 More Feasibility Questions, R&D Circulation and cryogenics questions: • establish solubility of H2 in Xe • operations: Xe purification removes H2 Effect of doping on signal generation: • measure charge (and light?) losses • estimate effect on discrimination • calibrate ultra-low energy recoils on H2 M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 8 HydroX Sensitivity Estimates Sensitivity assumptions: • Yields from SRIM + LZ modeling • 1 kg of H2 in LZ (1% mol fraction) • S2/S1 for NR recoils on proton is ER-like (i.e. no discrimination) • 500 live-days exposure SI SD M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 9 HydroX “Collaboration” and Timeline Collaboration is under construction! • Current team: SLAC, LBL, FNAL, UCSB, Northwestern, Penn State, University of Michigan, SURF, Imperial College (UK) • ECA funding at UCSb, LDRD at SLAC, “Xenon Futures” (STFC) at Imperial • Growing interest from LZ collaboration • Please reach out if you are interested! Hypothetical HydroX timeline: • 2020-21: R&D at FNAL/SLAC/UCSb/IC • 2022-23: cryogenics demonstration • 2025-26: possible upgrade to LZ? • 2027-30: HydroX science run M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 10 Conclusions and Outlook H-doping gives new capabilities to existing and upcoming LXe TPCs (LZ, XENON, PandaX, ...) • Favorable kinematic matching to low-mass DM, plus signal enhancement • Xe shielding, not available in a conventional low-mass experiment • Probe additional 100 MeV – 5 GeV DM mass range, with SI and SD sensitivity Even more interesting for a G3 experiment: • Planning for H2 doping from scratch would simplify and optimize detector design • If SiPM readout, He is back on the table (potentially easier cryogenics/purification) • Global mass reach: 100 MeV - 10 TeV! M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 11 Thank you! Slides https://and smu.zoom.usplots credits:/j/93594661518?pwd= UmlGdG1ZeDlpL1RxUy9FSFQwTmhqZz0 • H. Lippincott/A.9 Monte (UCSB) • A. Fan/M.E. Monzani/T. Shutt (SLAC) M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 12 Signal enhancement in H2+Xe Nuclear recoil off Xe: mXe = mXe → energy lost to heat (Lindhard) • at low energies, <20% observable…and falling! Nuclear recoil off H2: mp ≪ mXe → all electronic excitations • ~100% of energy is observable M.E. Monzani – HydroX CF1 Meeting, August 21, 2020 13.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Alternate Graphical Representation of Periodic Table of Chemical Elements Mohd Abubakr1, Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt
    An Alternate Graphical Representation of Periodic table of Chemical Elements Mohd Abubakr1, Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India. [email protected] Abstract Periodic table of chemical elements symbolizes an elegant graphical representation of symmetry at atomic level and provides an overview on arrangement of electrons. It started merely as tabular representation of chemical elements, later got strengthened with quantum mechanical description of atomic structure and recent studies have revealed that periodic table can be formulated using SO(4,2) SU(2) group. IUPAC, the governing body in Chemistry, doesn‟t approve any periodic table as a standard periodic table. The only specific recommendation provided by IUPAC is that the periodic table should follow the 1 to 18 group numbering. In this technical paper, we describe a new graphical representation of periodic table, referred as „Circular form of Periodic table‟. The advantages of circular form of periodic table over other representations are discussed along with a brief discussion on history of periodic tables. 1. Introduction The profoundness of inherent symmetry in nature can be seen at different depths of atomic scales. Periodic table symbolizes one such elegant symmetry existing within the atomic structure of chemical elements. This so called „symmetry‟ within the atomic structures has been widely studied from different prospects and over the last hundreds years more than 700 different graphical representations of Periodic tables have emerged [1]. Each graphical representation of chemical elements attempted to portray certain symmetries in form of columns, rows, spirals, dimensions etc. Out of all the graphical representations, the rectangular form of periodic table (also referred as Long form of periodic table or Modern periodic table) has gained wide acceptance.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Sources Challenge
    POWER SOURCES CHALLENGE FUSION PHYSICS! A CLEAN ENERGY Summary: What if we could harness the power of the Sun for energy here on Fusion reactions occur when two nuclei come together to form one Earth? What would it take to accomplish this feat? Is it possible? atom. The reaction that happens in the sun fuses two Hydrogen atoms together to produce Helium. It looks like this in a very simplified way: Many researchers including our Department of Energy scientists and H + H He + ENERGY. This energy can be calculated by the famous engineers are taking on this challenge! In fact, there is one DOE Laboratory Einstein equation, E = mc2. devoted to fusion physics and is committed to being at the forefront of the science of magnetic fusion energy. Each of the colliding hydrogen atoms is a different isotope of In order to understand a little more about fusion energy, you will learn about hydrogen, one deuterium and one the atom and how reactions at the atomic level produce energy. tritium. The difference in these isotopes is simply one neutron. Background: It all starts with plasma! If you need to learn more about plasma Deuterium has one proton and one physics, visit the Power Sources Challenge plasma activities. neutron, tritium has one proton and two neutrons. Look at the The Fusion Reaction that happens in the SUN looks like this: illustration—do you see how the mass of the products is less than the mass of the reactants? That is called a mass deficit and that difference in mass is converted into energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Properties of Water!
    Name: _______ANSWER KEY_______________ Class: _____ Date: _______________ Unique Properties of Water! Word Bank: Adhesion Evaporation Polar Surface tension Cohesion Freezing Positive Universal solvent Condensation Melting Sublimation Dissolve Negative 1. The electrons are not shared equally between the hydrogen and oxygen atoms of water creating a Polar molecule. 2. The polarity of water allows it to dissolve most substances. Because of this it is referred to as the universal solvent 3. Water molecules stick to other water molecules. This property is called cohesion. 4. Hydrogen bonds form between adjacent water molecules because the positive charged hydrogen end of one water molecule attracts the negative charged oxygen end of another water molecule. 5. Water molecules stick to other materials due to its polar nature. This property is called adhesion. 6. Hydrogen bonds hold water molecules closely together which causes water to have high surface tension. This is why water tends to clump together to form drops rather than spread out into a thin film. 7. Condensation is when water changes from a gas to a liquid. 8. Sublimation is when water changes from a solid directly to a gas. 9. Freezing is when water changes from a liquid to a solid. 10. Melting is when water changes from a solid to a liquid. 11. Evaporation is when water changes from a liquid to a gas. 12. Why does ice float? Water expands as it freezes, so it is LESS DENSE AS A SOLID. 13. What property refers to water molecules resembling magnets? How are these alike? Polar bonds create positive and negative ends of the molecule.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithium Hydride Powered PEM Fuel Cells for Long-Duration Small Mobile Robotic Missions
    Lithium Hydride Powered PEM Fuel Cells for Long-Duration Small Mobile Robotic Missions Jekanthan Thangavelautham, Daniel Strawser, Mei Yi Cheung Steven Dubowsky Abstract— This paper reports on a study to develop power supplies for small mobile robots performing long duration missions. It investigates the use of fuel cells to achieve this objective, and in particular Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells. It is shown through a representative case study that, in theory, fuel cell based power supplies will provide much longer range than the best current rechargeable battery technology. It also briefly discusses an important limitation that prevents fuel cells from achieving their ideal performance, namely a practical method to store their fuel (hydrogen) in a form that is compatible with small mobile field robots. A very efficient Fig. 1. Example of small robots (Left) A ball shaped hopping robot concept fuel storage concept based on water activated lithium hydride for exploration of extreme terrains and caves developed for NASA. (Right) (LiH) is proposed that releases hydrogen on demand. This iRobot 110 Firstlook used for observation, security and search and rescue. concept is very attractive because water vapor from the air is passively extracted or waste water from the fuel cell is recycled and transferred to the lithium hydride where the hydrogen is the near future. Hence, new means for powering field robots “stripped” from water and is returned to the fuel cell to form more water. This results in higher hydrogen storage efficiencies need to be considered. than conventional storage methods. Experimental results are This paper explores the use of fuel cells, and in particular presented that demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen, Nitrogen and Argon Chemistry
    Hydrogen, Nitrogen and Argon Chemistry Author: Brittland K. DeKorver Institute for Chemical Education and Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Purpose: To learn about 3 of the gases that are in Earth’s atmosphere. Learning Objectives: 1. Understand that the atmosphere is made up of many gases. 2. Learn about the differences in flammability of nitrogen and hydrogen. 3. Learn what is produced during electrolysis. Next Generation Science Standards (est. 2013): PS1.A: Structure and Properties of Matter PS1.B: Chemical Reactions PS3.D: Energy in Chemical Processes and Everyday Life (partial) ETS1.A: Defining Engineering Problems ETS1.B: Designing Solutions to Engineering Problems ETS1.C: Optimizing the Design Solution National Science Education Standards (valid 1996-2013): Physical Science Standards: Properties and changes of properties in matter Earth and Space Science Standards: Structure of the earth system Suggested Previous Activities: Oxygen Investigation and Carbon Dioxide Chemistry Grade Level: 2-8 Time: 1 hour Materials: Safety glasses Manganese dioxide Work gloves (for handling Tea-light candles steel wool) Matches Test tubes Spatulas Beakers Wooden splints 100mL graduated cylinders Waste bucket for burnt 15mL graduated cylinders materials 3% hydrogen peroxide Vinegar Baking soda Safety: 1. Students should wear safety glasses during all activities. 2. Students should not be allowed to use matches or candle. 3. Students should be cautioned to only mix the chemicals as directed. Introduction: Air refers to the mixture of gases that make up the Earth’s atmosphere. In this lesson, students will learn about hydrogen (present in very, very small amounts in our atmosphere), nitrogen (the most prevalent gas), and argon (third behind nitrogen and oxygen.) Procedures: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • MODULE 11: GLOSSARY and CONVERSIONS Cell Engines
    Hydrogen Fuel MODULE 11: GLOSSARY AND CONVERSIONS Cell Engines CONTENTS 11.1 GLOSSARY.......................................................................................................... 11-1 11.2 MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 11-31 11.3 CONVERSION TABLE .......................................................................................... 11-33 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Engines and Related Technologies: Rev 0, December 2001 Hydrogen Fuel MODULE 11: GLOSSARY AND CONVERSIONS Cell Engines OBJECTIVES This module is for reference only. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Engines and Related Technologies: Rev 0, December 2001 PAGE 11-1 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Engines MODULE 11: GLOSSARY AND CONVERSIONS 11.1 Glossary This glossary covers words, phrases, and acronyms that are used with fuel cell engines and hydrogen fueled vehicles. Some words may have different meanings when used in other contexts. There are variations in the use of periods and capitalization for abbrevia- tions, acronyms and standard measures. The terms in this glossary are pre- sented without periods. ABNORMAL COMBUSTION – Combustion in which knock, pre-ignition, run- on or surface ignition occurs; combustion that does not proceed in the nor- mal way (where the flame front is initiated by the spark and proceeds throughout the combustion chamber smoothly and without detonation). ABSOLUTE PRESSURE – Pressure shown on the pressure gauge plus at- mospheric pressure (psia). At sea level atmospheric pressure is 14.7 psia. Use absolute pressure in compressor calculations and when using the ideal gas law. See also psi and psig. ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE – Temperature scale with absolute zero as the zero of the scale. In standard, the absolute temperature is the temperature in ºF plus 460, or in metric it is the temperature in ºC plus 273. Absolute zero is referred to as Rankine or r, and in metric as Kelvin or K.
    [Show full text]
  • Xenon in Earth's Atmosphere Is Severely Mass Fractionated and Depleted Compared to Any Plausible Solar System Source Material, Yet Kr Is Unfractionated
    Xenon Fractionation, Hydrogen Escape, and the Oxidation of the Earth Xenon in Earth's atmosphere is severely mass fractionated and depleted compared to any plausible solar system source material, yet Kr is unfractionated. These observations seem to imply that Xe has escaped from Earth. But to date no process has been identified that can cause Xe, which is heavier than Kr, to escape while Kr does not. Vigorous hydrodynamic hydrogen escape can produce mass fractionation in heavy gases (Hunten et al. 1987, Sasaki & Nakazawa 1988, Pepin 1991). The required hydrogen flux is very high but within the possible range permitted by solar Extreme Ultraviolet radiation (EUV, which here means radiation at wavelengths short enough to be absorbed efficiently by hydrogen) heating when Earth was on the order of 100 Myrs old or younger. However this model cannot explain why Xe escapes but Kr does not. Recently, what appears to be ancient atmospheric xenon has been recovered from several very ancient (3-3.5 Ga) terrestrial hydrothermal barites and cherts (Pujol 2011, 2013). What is eye-catching about this ancient Xe is that it is less fractionated that Xe in modern air. In other words, it appears that a process was active on Earth some 3 to 3.5 billion years ago that caused xenon to fractionate. By this time the Sun was no longer the EUV source that it used to. If xenon was being fractionated by escape — currently the only viable hypothesis — it had to be in the less unfamiliar context of Earth’s Archean atmosphere and under rather modest levels of EUV forcing.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Molecules and Surface Tension Water Holds Unique Properties Which Makes It "Sticky" at the Surface
    Water Molecules and Surface Tension Water holds unique properties which makes it "sticky" at the surface. Each individual water molecule has one large oxygen atom and two smaller hydrogen atoms. The hydrogen atoms hold a slightly positive charge, making the entire water molecule polar. Like tiny magnets, the hydrogen atoms attract the oxygen atoms from other water molecules, creating temporary hydrogen bonds within the water. Each water molecule experiences a pull from other water molecules from every direction, but water molecules at the surface do not have molecules above the surface to pull at them. These water molecules have more pull from the water below than the surface above. This difference in force packs the water molecules at the surface closer together than they are inside the liquid. The thin, dense layer of molecules produces the phenomenon called surface tension. VARIABLE: SOAP Detergent and Water Detergent and soap are similar chemically, except for the oil in them. Many soaps use natural fats. Soap and detergent molecules have two ends which act as a bridge between water molecules and grease (fat) molecules. One end is called hydrophilic- water loving which is the head of the molecule; the other end is hydrophobic- water fearing, which is the tail part of the molecule. This allows the soap or detergent to grab onto the grease from a dirty dish and use the other end of the detergent molecule to latch on to water to be washed away. When the grease and dirt is collected in the soap, a micelle is created. Detergent and Soap Break Surface Tension Detergent molecules' two ends make it able to break through the surface tension of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen and Nitrogen Cosmochemistry
    Ge 232 term paper, 1/7/13 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 HYDROGEN AND NITROGEN COSMOCHEMISTRY: A REVIEW Adam Waszczak Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Ge 232 term paper, 1/7/13 ABSTRACT Hydrogen and nitrogen are both unique elements, showing substantial variation relative to each other and to their only secondary isotopes (deuterium and nitrogen-15). Yet compared to other elemental and isotopic systems|oxygen in particular|hydrogen and nitrogen are less-often examined in a comprehensive cosmochemical context. We review the cosmochemistry of these elements, starting with their cosmic and interstellar abundances, then the protosolar nebula and primitive (cometary and carbonaceous) bodies, and finally the planets of the solar system. We summarize the major observations which have thusfar provided key constraints on the cosmochemical evolution of H and N, and emphasize areas which would benefit from future investigation. 1. COSMIC ORIGINS AND ABUNDANCES from spectroscopic lines). However, neutral N2|the To first order, the universe consists primarily of hydro- long-assumed (and model-predicted) predominant form gen atoms formed during the Big Bang. Nucleosynthesis of nitrogen in the ISM (Herbst and Klemperer 1976)|is set a primordial isotopic ratio of ∼25 deuterium atoms notoriously difficult to measure directly due to a lack of 2 1 observable rotational and vibrational lines. The usual (D = H) per million H atoms. A basic description of + most interstellar material is the state of its hydrogen: ei- work-around is to observe N2H and infer the N2 ra- + tio from chemical modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Producing Low-Carbon Hydrogen at Scale
    Options for producing low-carbon hydrogen at scale POLICY BRIEFING POLICY BRIEFING Politics and science frequently move on vastly different timescales. A policymaker seeking evidence on a new policy will often need the answer in weeks or months, while it takes years to design and undertake the research to rigorously address a new policy question. The value of an extended investigation into a topic cannot be understated, but when this is not possible good evidence is better than none. The Royal Society’s series of policy briefings is a new mechanism aiming to bridge that divide. Drawing on the expertise of Fellows of the Royal Society and the wider scientific community, these policy briefings provide rapid and authoritative syntheses of current evidence. These briefings lay out the current state of knowledge and the questions that remain to be answered around a policy question often defined alongside a partner. Options for producing low-carbon hydrogen at scale Issued: January 2018 DES4801_2 ISBN: 978-1-78252-318-5 The text of this work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. The license is available at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Images are not covered by this license. This report can be viewed online at royalsociety.org/low-carbon-energy-programme Cover image: © science photo / Shutterstock CONTENTS Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Why hydrogen? 6 1.1 Additional considerations for deployment 6 2. Thermochemical routes to hydrogen 10 2.1 Alternative thermochemical processes for hydrogen production 10 2.2 Thermochemical challenges and research needs 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elements.Pdf
    A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division Presents Periodic Table of the Elements A Resource for Elementary, Middle School, and High School Students Click an element for more information: Group** Period 1 18 IA VIIIA 1A 8A 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 2 1 H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIAVIIA He 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 Li Be B C N O F Ne 6.941 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3 Na Mg IIIB IVB VB VIB VIIB ------- VIII IB IIB Al Si P S Cl Ar 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B ------- 1B 2B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.07 35.45 39.95 ------- 8 ------- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 4 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.47 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.59 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.80 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5 Rb Sr Y Zr NbMo Tc Ru Rh PdAgCd In Sn Sb Te I Xe 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.94 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 57 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 6 Cs Ba La* Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt AuHg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 132.9 137.3 138.9 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 190.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (210) (210) (222) 87 88 89 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 116 118 7 Fr Ra Ac~RfDb Sg Bh Hs Mt --- --- --- --- --- --- (223) (226) (227) (257) (260) (263) (262) (265) (266) () () () () () () http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/ (1 of 3) [5/17/2001 4:06:20 PM] A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Lanthanide Series* Ce Pr NdPmSm Eu Gd TbDyHo Er TmYbLu 140.1 140.9 144.2 (147) 150.4 152.0 157.3 158.9 162.5 164.9 167.3 168.9 173.0 175.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Actinide Series~ Th Pa U Np Pu AmCmBk Cf Es FmMdNo Lr 232.0 (231) (238) (237) (242) (243) (247) (247) (249) (254) (253) (256) (254) (257) ** Groups are noted by 3 notation conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Hydrogen and Helium from Their Mixtures Using Metal Hydrides
    RECOVERY OF HYDROGEN AND HELIUM FROM THEIR MIXTURES USING METAL HYDRIDES by MUZAFFER TONGUC OZTEK B.S. Middle East Technical University, 1999 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Chemistry in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2005 © 2005 Muzaffer Tonguc Oztek ii ABSTRACT Waste streams of hydrogen and helium mixtures are produced at the Kennedy Space Center during purging of the hydrogen systems and supply lines. This process is done prior to and after hydrogen servicing. The purged waste gases are lost to the atmosphere, resulting in an annual loss of 2 million and 0.1 million standard cubic meters of helium and hydrogen, respectively. Recovery of these gases will have an economic benefit. Metals, alloys, and intermetallics are known to react with hydrogen in favorable conditions; therefore, they have the possibility of serving as separating and recovery agents. In this study, Mg2Ni, VTiNi and LaNi5 were studied for the separation of H2 from He, using differential scanning calorimetry and thermal volumetric analysis. The ability of LaNi5 to react with hydrogen reversibly at room temperature was verified, and further analysis focused on this compound. Size reduction and activation of LaNi5 by mechanical milling was investigated using different milling parameters for the purpose of activating the material for hydrogen absorption. Because it has been shown that addition of aluminum to LaNi5 resulted in improved hydriding and dehydriding properties, that system was studied further here. In this study, aluminum was added to LaNi5 by mechanical milling.
    [Show full text]