DOCSLIB.ORG

The Preliminary Results of Contemporary Investigations of Fish Diversity in the Amur Basin: Species Structure on the Boundary of XX-XXI Centuries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Preliminary Results of Contemporary Investigations of Fish Diversity in the Amur Basin: Species Structure on the Boundary of XX-XXI Centuries The preliminary results of contemporary investigations of fish diversity in the Amur Basin: species structure on the boundary of XX-XXI centuries Novomodnyy G.V. Khabarovsk Branch Pacific Research Fisheries Centre. [email protected], [email protected] In 2001 the author begun the phonographic (Digital-Photo) and museum collection of the Amur River fishes. Current findings on the species diversity of the Amur River underlie in this work (foremost Annotated Check-List of Cyclostomata and Fishes of the Continental Waters of Russia (1998); Fauna Sinica Osteichthys: Cypriniformes (1998 end 2000), Siluriformes (1999); Description of species inhabiting the Heilongjiang Province (1995); revision of loaches made by Vasili’eva (2001). Results of expeditions carried by author in 2001-2002: • discovery of Rhodeus ocellatus in waters of the Amur River (the Kiya River belonging to the Ussuri and the Bira River belonging to the Middle Amur basin). • discovery of twin species, hiding under taxons Acanthorhodeus asmussii and Acanthorhodeus chankaensis (species derived from the group “chankaensis”= A. gracilis (Korea), second species in the group “asmussii” is possibly A.macropterus. • discovery of Lefua costata in the Khor River (the Ussuri Basin) Ladislavia taczanowskii the Kiya, Khor, Bolshaya Ussurka, Anuy (The Lower Amur); Micropercops cinctus and Paramisgurnus dabrianus near Khabarovsk city; Misgurnus anguillicaudatus in the Sungari basin (these fishes bought alive on the market in Harbin with other species of loach); • information: where? when? and what fishing gear? to catch species • new data about some species abundance that were be consider as rare. • collection of own digital photos of 88 species from the Amur River made in vital staining Own investigations, analysis of scientific sources, help of colleagues allowed to count 133 species in the Amur basin (including brackish waters of the Amur Estuary) (Table 1). With this 26 species were included to «Annotated Check-List…», one species Sarcocheilichthys soldatovi was deleted from this list. Approximately 18 species were introduced in the Amur by man: the introduction of 6 species was intentional; 13 species from 18 were acclimatized, 7 species were distributed outside waters of allocation. The development of artificial propagation in the Ussuri basin changes the list of species introduced in the Amur River. The list of the Amur River species includes also 7 marine and 1 euryhaline species. 7 anadromous species run occasionally in the Amur River. 8 species from the list don’t exist in Russian waters. The existence of 4 species is disputable. Now the Khabarovsk Branch of Pacific Research Fisheries Center intensified the faunal investigations. Almost all scientists working on rivers of the Khabarovsk Territory are brought to collect the Amur Basin species. Thanks to Sergey Zolotukhin for constant help to catch this collection. We thanks also Alexander Antonov (Institute of Water Problems, Khabarovsk), Mikhail Skopets (Wild Salmon Center, Portland), Igor Frolov (Department of Fisheries of the Khabarovsk Territory), Sergei Mokrov (Fish Conservation Inspection of Birobizhan) for investigation of mountainous rivers of the Khabarovsk Territory. We offer special thanks to university-fellow Sergey Shedko (Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Vladivostok) as a high professional opponent of author's too fast deductions. 1 Table 1. List of 133 species inhabiting or probably inhabiting fresh and brackish waters of the Amur basin in 2002 (including introduced, brackish water, marine and occasionally migrating anadromous species) Families – num- Species Comment Megalobrama skolkovii (Dybowsky, 1872) D ber of species Parabramis pekinensis (Basilewsky, 1855) D Acipenseridae – 5 Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869 +Ii(-) Phoxinus czekanowskii Dybowski, 1869 ?D Acipenser medirostris Ayres, 1854 A(-) Phoxinus lagowskii Dybowski, 1869 D Acipenser ruthenus Linnaeus, 1758 +I(-) Phoxinus oxycephalus Sauvage et Dabry de D Acipenser schrenckii Brandt, 1869 D Thiersant, 1874 Huso dauricus (Georgi, 1775) D Phoxinus perenurus (Pallas, 1814) D Bagridae – 5 Leiocassis argentivittatus (Regan, 1905) D Phoxinus phoxinus (Linnaeus, 1758) D Pelteobagrus fulvidraco (Richardson, 1846) D Pseudaspius leptocephalus (Pallas, 1776) D Pelteobagrus nitidus (Sauvage et Dabry, D Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758) +Isi(+)CD 1874) Tribolodon hakuensis (Guenther, 1877) A(-)D ?Pseudobagrus herzensteini (Berg, 1907) D Cyprinidae – Aphyocypris chinensis Guenther, 1868 C Pseudobagrus ussuriensis (Dybowski, 1872) D Rasborinae – 4 Ochetobius elongatus (Kner, 1867) I(-)K Balitoridae – 2 Barbatula toni (Dybowski, 1869) D Opsariichthys uncirostris (Temminck et D Lefua costata (Kessler, 1876) D Schlegel, 1846) Belontiidae – 1 Macropodus chinensis (Bloch, 1790) +?I(+)CR Zacco platypus (Temmick et Schlegel, 1846) +C Channidae – 1 Channa argus (Cantor, 1842) D Cyprinidae – Plagiognathops microlepis (Bleeker, 1871) KC Cobitidae – 8 Cobitis choii Kim et Son, 1984 D Xenocyprininae – Pseudobrama simioni (Bleeker, 1864) +C Cobitis lutheri Rendahl, 1935 D 3 Xenocypris argentea (Basilewsky, 1855) D Cobitis melanoleuca Nichols, 1925 D Eleotrididae – 2 Micropercops cinctus (Dabry de Thiersant, CRD Leptobotia mantschurica Berg, 1907 D 1872) Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cantor, 1842) +Ii(+)CD Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 D Misgurnus mohoity (Dybowski, 1868) D Esocidae –1 Esox reichertii Dybowski, 1869 D Misgurnus nikolskyi Vasilieva, 2001 +D Gadidae – 1 Eleginus gracilis (Tilesius, 1910) SeaD Paramisgurnus dabrianus Sauvage, 1878 +I(+)CRD Gasterosteidae – Gasterosteus sp. Шедько, 2001 D Coregonidae – 4 Coregonus autumnalis migratorius (Georgi, +Isi(+) 4 Pungitius bussei (Warpachowski, 1887) + 1775) Pungitius pungitius (Linnaeus, 1758) D Coregonus chadary Dybowski, 1869 D Pungitius sinensis (Guichenot, 1869) D Coregonus peled (Gmelin, 1789) +Isi(+) Gobiidae –3 Gymnogobius urotaenia (Hilgendorf, 1879) D Coregonus ussuriensis Berg, 1906 D Rhinogobius brunneus (Temminck et D Cottidae – 3 Cottus poecilopus Heckel, 1837 D Schlegel, 1845) Megalocottus platycephalus (Pallas, 1814) Sea Tridentiger bifasciatus (Steindachner, 1881) Evr Mesocottus haitej (Dybowski, 1869) D Ictaluridae – 1 Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818) +Ii(-) Cyprinidae – Acanthorhodeus asmussii (Dybowski, 1872) D Lotidae – 1 Lota lota (Linnaeus, 1758) D Acheilognathinae Acanthorhodeus chankaensis (Dybowski, D Mugilidae – 1 Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758 SeaD – 7 1872) Oryziatidae – 1 Oryzias latipes (Temminck et Schlegel, 1846) +?I(+)C Acanthorhodeus gracilis Regan, 1908 +D Osmeridae – 3 Hypomesus nipponensis (McAllister, 1963) D Acanthorhodeus macropterus Bleeker, 1871 +D Hypomesus olidus (Pallas, 1814) D Rhodeus fangi (Miao, 1934) ?I(+)D Osmerus mordax (Mitchill, 1814) D Rhodeus ocellatus (Kner, 1867) +I(+)D Percichthidae – 1 Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky, 1855) D Rhodeus sericeus (Pallas, 1776) D Percidae – 2 Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758 Isi(+)D Cyprinidae – Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, D Stizostedion lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) I(+)D Barbinae – 3 1844) Petromyzontidae Lethenteron camtschaticum (Tilesius, 1811) D Mylopharyngodon piceus (Richardson, 1846) – 2 Lethenteron reissneri (Dybowski, 1869) D Squaliobarbus curriculus (Richardson, 1846) CR Pholidae – 1 Pholis pictus (Kner, 1868) Sea Cyprinidae – Chanodichthys dabryi (Bleeker, 1871) KC Pleuronectidae – Liopsetta pinnifasciata (Kner, 1870) Sea Cultrinae – 6 Chanodichthys erythropterus (Basilewsky, D 2 Platichthys stellatus (Pallas, 1787) SeaD 1855) Salangidae – 1 Salangichthys microdon Bleeker, 1860 Sea Chanodichthys mongolicus (Basilewsky, D Salmonidae – 12 Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773) D 1855) Brachymystax tumensis Mori, 1931 D Culter alburnus Basilewsky, 1855 D Hucho taimen (Pallas, 1773) D Hemiculter leucisculus (Basilewsky, 1855) D Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walbaum, 1792) D Hemiculter lucidus (Dybowski, 1872) D Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum, 1792) D Cyprinidae – Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) D Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum, 1792) A(-)D Cyprininae – 2 Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 D Oncorhynchus masou (Brevoort, 1856) D Cyprinidae – ?Abbottina lalinensis Huang et Li, 1995 +C Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum, 1792) Is(-)A(-) Gobioninae – 18 Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky, 1855) D Oncorhynchus tschawytscha (Walbaum, A(-)D Gnathopogon strigatus (Regan, 1908) D 1792) Gobio gobio cynocephalus Dybowski, 1869 D Parasalmo mykiss Walbaum, 1792 A(-)D Gobio soldatovi Berg, 1914 D Salvelinus leucomaenis (Pallas, 1814) A(-)D Gobiobotia pappenheimi Kreyenberg, 1911 D Salvelinus malma curilus (Pallas, 1814) D ?Gobiobotia sp. Крыжановский, Смирнов, + Siluridae – 2 Silurus asotus (Linnaeus, 1758) D Соин, 1951 Silurus soldatovi Nikolsky et Soin, 1948 Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas, 1776) D Thymallidae – 5 Thymallus grubii Dybowski, 1869 Hemibarbus maculatus Bleeker, 1871 D Thymallus sp.1 Шедько, 2001 +D Ladislavia taczanowskii Dybowski, 1869 D Thymallus sp.2 Шедько, 2001 +D Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck et D Thymallus pallasi Vallenciennes, 1848 (?ssp.) +D Schlegel, 1846) ?Thymallus sp.3 Антонов (фото)+D Romanogobio tenuicorpus (Mori, 1934) D Conventions: Rostrogobio amurensis Taranetz, 1937 D + -not noted in “Annotated Check-List of Cyclostomata and Fishes of the Sarcocheilichthys nigripinnis czerskii (Berg, D continental waters of Russia. 1998”; 1914) I(+) – introduced occasionally of specially (s) , occurred abundantly, spawn Sarcocheilichthys sinensis Bleeker, 1871 D in waters of allocation and outside ( i – probably only in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chanodichthys Recurviceps (A Fish, No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Chanodichthys recurviceps (a fish, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, June 2012 Revised, November 2016 Web Version, 6/18/2018 Photo: H. T. Cheng. Licensed under CC BY-NC. Available: http://naturewatch.org.nz/taxa/187285-Culter-recurviceps. (November 2016). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Zhao and Cui (2011): “Known from Zhu Jiang River (Pearl River) in Guangdong and Guanxi Provinces, and Hainan Province in China.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. 1 Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2016): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Culter Basilewsky, 1855 Species Culter recurviceps (Richardson, 1846)” From Eschmeyer et al. (2016): “recurviceps, Leuciscus Richardson [J.] 1846:295 [Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 15th meeting [1845] […]] Canton, China. No types known. Based solely on an illustration by Reeves (see Whitehead 1970:210, Pl. 17a […]). •Valid as Erythroculter recurviceps (Richardson 1846) -- (Lu in Pan et al. 1991:93 […]). •Questionably the same as Culter alburnus Basilewsky 1855 -- (Bogutskaya & Naseka 1996:24 […], Naseka 1998:75 […]). •Valid as Culter recurviceps (Richardson 1846) -- (Luo & Chen in Chen et al. 1998:188 […], Zhang et al. 2016:59 […]). •Valid as Chanodichthys recurviceps (Richardson 1846) -- (Kottelat 2013:87 […]).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Monogenoidea of Freshwater Fish of Palaeartic and Amur Regions
    GUIDE TO MONOGENOIDEA OF FRESHWATER FISH OF PALAEARTIC AND AMUR REGIONS O.N. PUGACHEV, P.I. GERASEV, A.V. GUSSEV, R. ERGENS, I. KHOTENOWSKY Scientific Editors P. GALLI O.N. PUGACHEV D. C. KRITSKY LEDIZIONI-LEDIPUBLISHING © Copyright 2009 Edizioni Ledizioni LediPublishing Via Alamanni 11 Milano http://www.ledipublishing.com e-mail: [email protected] First printed: January 2010 Cover by Ledizioni-Ledipublishing ISBN 978-88-95994-06-2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or utilized in any form or by any means, electonical, mechanical, photocopying or oth- erwise, without permission in writing from the publisher. Front cover: /Dactylogyrus extensus,/ three dimensional image by G. Strona and P. Galli. 3 Introduction; 6 Class Monogenoidea A.V. Gussev; 8 Subclass Polyonchoinea; 15 Order Dactylogyridea A.V. Gussev, P.I. Gerasev, O.N. Pugachev; 15 Suborder Dactylogyrinea: 13 Family Dactylogyridae; 17 Subfamily Dactylogyrinae; 13 Genus Dactylogyrus; 20 Genus Pellucidhaptor; 265 Genus Dogielius; 269 Genus Bivaginogyrus; 274 Genus Markewitschiana; 275 Genus Acolpenteron; 277 Genus Pseudacolpenteron; 280 Family Ancyrocephalidae; 280 Subfamily Ancyrocephalinae; 282 Genus Ancyrocephalus; 282 Subfamily Ancylodiscoidinae; 306 Genus Ancylodiscoides; 307 Genus Thaparocleidus; 308 Genus Pseudancylodiscoides; 331 Genus Bychowskyella; 332 Order Capsalidea A.V. Gussev; 338 Family Capsalidae; 338 Genus Nitzschia; 338 Order Tetraonchidea O.N. Pugachev; 340 Family Tetraonchidae; 341 Genus Tetraonchus; 341 Genus Salmonchus; 345 Family Bothitrematidae; 359 Genus Bothitrema; 359 Order Gyrodactylidea R. Ergens, O.N. Pugachev, P.I. Gerasev; 359 Family Gyrodactylidae; 361 Subfamily Gyrodactylinae; 361 Genus Gyrodactylus; 362 Genus Paragyrodactylus; 456 Genus Gyrodactyloides; 456 Genus Laminiscus; 457 Subclass Oligonchoinea A.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Amur Fish: Wealth and Crisis
    Amur Fish: Wealth and Crisis ББК 28.693.32 Н 74 Amur Fish: Wealth and Crisis ISBN 5-98137-006-8 Authors: German Novomodny, Petr Sharov, Sergei Zolotukhin Translators: Sibyl Diver, Petr Sharov Editors: Xanthippe Augerot, Dave Martin, Petr Sharov Maps: Petr Sharov Photographs: German Novomodny, Sergei Zolotukhin Cover photographs: Petr Sharov, Igor Uchuev Design: Aleksey Ognev, Vladislav Sereda Reviewed by: Nikolai Romanov, Anatoly Semenchenko Published in 2004 by WWF RFE, Vladivostok, Russia Printed by: Publishing house Apelsin Co. Ltd. Any full or partial reproduction of this publication must include the title and give credit to the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright holder. No photographs from this publication may be reproduced without prior authorization from WWF Russia or authors of the photographs. © WWF, 2004 All rights reserved Distributed for free, no selling allowed Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 5 Amur Fish Diversity and Research History ............................................................................. 6 Species Listed In Red Data Book of Russia ......................................................................... 13 Yellowcheek ................................................................................................................................... 13 Black Carp (Amur) ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyprinid Fish
    DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliotheque 01005886 c.i FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. Circular No. 65 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B0C. Circular No. 65 9^ RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS ^5, Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FOREWORD This short Russian-English glossary is meant to be of assistance in translating scientific articles in the fields of aquatic biology and the study of fishes and fisheries. j^ Definitions have been obtained from a variety of sources. For the names of fishes, the text volume of "Commercial Fishes of the USSR" provided English equivalents of many Russian names. Others were found in Berg's "Freshwater Fishes", and in works by Nikolsky (1954), Galkin (1958), Borisov and Ovsiannikov (1958), Martinsen (1959), and others. The kinds of fishes most emphasized are the larger species, especially those which are of importance as food fishes in the USSR, hence likely to be encountered in routine translating. However, names of a number of important commercial species in other parts of the world have been taken from Martinsen's list. For species for which no recognized English name was discovered, I have usually given either a transliteration or a translation of the Russian name; these are put in quotation marks to distinguish them from recognized English names.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Trends of the Pharyngeal Dentition in Cypriniformes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi)
    Evolutionary trends of the pharyngeal dentition in Cypriniformes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi). Emmanuel Pasco-Viel, Cyril Charles, Pascale Chevret, Marie Semon, Paul Tafforeau, Laurent Viriot, Vincent Laudet To cite this version: Emmanuel Pasco-Viel, Cyril Charles, Pascale Chevret, Marie Semon, Paul Tafforeau, et al.. Evolution- ary trends of the pharyngeal dentition in Cypriniformes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi).. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2010, 5 (6), pp.e11293. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011293. hal-00591939 HAL Id: hal-00591939 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00591939 Submitted on 31 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Evolutionary Trends of the Pharyngeal Dentition in Cypriniformes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi) Emmanuel Pasco-Viel1, Cyril Charles3¤, Pascale Chevret2, Marie Semon2, Paul Tafforeau4, Laurent Viriot1,3*., Vincent Laudet2*. 1 Evo-devo of Vertebrate Dentition, Institut de Ge´nomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Universite´ de Lyon, CNRS, INRA, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure de Lyon, Lyon, France, 2 Molecular Zoology, Institut de Ge´nomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Universite´ de Lyon, CNRS, INRA, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure de Lyon, Lyon, France, 3 iPHEP, CNRS UMR 6046, Universite´ de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, 4 European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France Abstract Background: The fish order Cypriniformes is one of the most diverse ray-finned fish groups in the world with more than 3000 recognized species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudokabatana Alburnus N. Gen. N. Sp., (Microsporidia) from the Liver of Topmouth Culter Culter Alburnus (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) from China
    Parasitology Research (2019) 118:1689–1699 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06303-z FISH PARASITOLOGY - REVIEW Pseudokabatana alburnus n. gen. n. sp., (Microsporidia) from the liver of topmouth culter Culter alburnus (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) from China X. H. Liu1,2 & G. D. Stentiford3,4 & V. N. Voronin5 & H. Sato6 & A. H. Li1,2 & J. Y. Zhang1,2 Received: 13 September 2018 /Accepted: 25 March 2019 /Published online: 11 April 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract We describe the type species of a novel genus of microsporidian parasite, Pseudokabatana alburnus n. gen. n. sp., infecting the liver of topmouth culter, Culter alburnus Basilewsky, 1855, from Lake Poyang off Xingzi county, Jiangxi Province, China. The parasite elicits formation of spherical xenomas of up to 1.2 mm in diameter containing all observed life stages from early merogonal plasmodia to mature spores contained within the cytoplasm of host hepatocytes. Merogonal plasmodia existed in direct contact with the host cytoplasm and contained up to 20 visible nuclei. Plasmotomy of the multinucleate plasmodium led to formation of uninucleate cells in which the nucleus underwent further division to form bi-nucleate presporonts, sporonts (defined by cells with a thickened endospore) and eventually sporoblasts (containing pre-cursors of the spore extrusion apparatus). Mature spores were pyriform and monokaryotic, measuring 2.3 ± 0.19 μm long and 1.3 ± 0.10 μm wide. Spores possessed a bipartite polaroplast and 5– 6 coils of a polar filament, in a single rank. The obtained partial SSU rRNA gene sequence, 1383 bp in length, did not match any of microsporidia available in GenBank.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Regulation of Food Intake in Fish: an Evolutionary Perspective
    60 4 Journal of Molecular J L Soengas et al. Review on food intake 60:4 R171–R199 Endocrinology regulation in fish REVIEW Central regulation of food intake in fish: an evolutionary perspective José Luis Soengas1, José Miguel Cerdá-Reverter2 and María Jesús Delgado3 1Departamento de Bioloxía Funcional e Ciencias da Saúde, Laboratorio de Fisioloxía Animal, Facultade de Bioloxía and Centro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain 2Departamento de Fisiología de Peces y Biotecnología, Instituto de Acuicultura Torre de la Sal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Castellón, Spain 3Departamento de Fisiología (Fisiología Animal II), Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to J L Soengas: [email protected] Abstract Evidence indicates that central regulation of food intake is well conserved along the Key Words vertebrate lineage, at least between teleost fish and mammals. However, several f feeding differences arise in the comparison between both groups. In this review, we describe f fish similarities and differences between teleost fish and mammals on an evolutionary f review perspective. We focussed on the existing knowledge of specific fish features conditioning f nutrient signalling food intake, anatomical homologies and analogies between both groups as well as f endocrine signalling the main signalling pathways of neuroendocrine and metabolic nature involved in the homeostatic and hedonic central regulation of food intake. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2018) 60, R171–R199 Introduction Fish are the most diversified group of vertebrates with which information is available. Evidence indicates that 33,700 species identified so far www.fi( shbase.org), of the regulation of food intake is well conserved along which 95% are teleosts comprising half of all known the vertebrate lineage, at least between teleosts and vertebrate species (Nelson 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the East Tiaoxi River in Zhejiang Province, China
    327 Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 327-343, 9 figs., 1 tab., March 2013 © 2013 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISSN 0936-9902 Fishes of the East Tiaoxi River in Zhejiang Province, China Jun Nakajima*, **, Tatsuro Sato*, Yuichi Kano*, Liangliang Huang***, Jyun-ichi Kitamura****, Jianhua Li*** and Yukihiro Shimatani* We conducted fish sampling at 90 sites in the East Tiaoxi River, Yangtze River basin, China. Seventy-seven species belonging to 19 families were recorded, and photographs of live specimens are provided for all species. Three exotic species were recorded: Cirrhinus cirrhosus, C. molitorella, Gambusia affinis. The top 3 species-rich families were Cyprinidae (46 %), Cobitidae (5 %) and Gobiidae (5 %). The species composition in the East Tiaoxi River is similar to that of the Yangtze River Basin; however, the East Tiaoxi River has quite a diverse fish fauna for a small river system. Introduction the fish fauna is said to be closely related to that of the Yangtze River (Fu et al., 2003). Although The Yangtze River basin is known to support a there has been fragmentary information on the diverse freshwater fish fauna, and this river basin fish fauna of the East Tiaoxi River (Mao et al., is very important in terms of formative history 1991; Kano et al., 2011; Sato et al., 2011; Li et al., of the East Asian freshwater fish fauna (Fu et al., 2012), these studies have some taxonomic prob- 2003; Yu et al., 2005). The Yangtze River and its lems and the fish fauna of the East Tiaoxi River lakes were listed in the “Global 200” by World remains to be completely elucidated.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Mongolia a Check-List of the fi Shes Known to Occur in Mongolia with Comments on Systematics and Nomenclature
    37797 Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Environment and Social Development East Asia and Pacific Region THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, USA Telephone: 202 473 1000 Facsimile: 202 522 1666 E-mail: worldbank.org/eapenvironment worldbank.org/eapsocial Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Fishes of Mongolia A check-list of the fi shes known to occur in Mongolia with comments on systematics and nomenclature Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized MAURICE KOTTELAT Fishes of Mongolia A check-list of the fi shes known to occur in Mongolia with comments on systematics and nomenclature Maurice Kottelat September 2006 ©2006 Th e International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 USA September 2006 All rights reserved. Th is report has been funded by Th e World Bank’s Netherlands-Mongolia Trust Fund for Environmental Reform (NEMO). Some photographs were obtained during diff erent activities and the author retains all rights over all photographs included in this report. Environment and Social Development Unit East Asia and Pacifi c Region World Bank Washington D.C. Contact details for author: Maurice Kottelat Route de la Baroche 12, Case Postale 57, CH-2952 Cornol, Switzerland. Email: [email protected] Th is volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/Th e World Bank. Th e fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of Th e World Bank or the governments they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue Distribution and Elimination of Florfenicol in Topmouth Culter (Culter Alburnus) After Oral Administration
    Vol. 27, 2009, No. 3: 316–221 Czech J. Food Sci. Tissue Distribution and Elimination of Florfenicol in Topmouth Culter (Culter alburnus) after Oral Administration Weifen WANG1, Xianjun DAI1, Zhiqiang LI2 and Qingli MENG1 1College of Life Science, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; 2Xiaoshan School of Science and Technology, Zhejiang Ocean University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China Abstract Wang W., Dai X., Li Z., Meng Q. (2009): Tissue distribution and elimination of florfenicol in topmouth culter (Culter alburnus) after oral administration. Czech J. Food Sci., 27: 216–221. The serum concentration and muscle residue of florfenicol following oral administration were evaluated in topmouth culter (Culter alburnus) under field conditions. Fishes were cultured in tanks and fed a commercial medicated diet containing 2000 mg/kg florfenicol in a single dose. The sampling was conducted at different intervals (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 h) after the cessation of medication. Drug analysis was carried out by HPLC. The maximum concentration (Cmax) of 10.8 μg/g in serum and 4.2 μg/g in muscle were reached at the same time (tmax) of 8 hours. If the EU MRL value of 1.0 μg/g is quoted for the topmouth culter tissue, the extrapolation of the data indicated that it will be passed after a 40.6 h withdrawal period for florfenicol in topmouth culter muscle. Keywords: serum; elimination; florfenicol; topmouth culter (Culter alburnus) Florfenicol is a fluorinated analogue of thiam- pounds, could become a major drug in veterinary phenicol and its structure also resembles that medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding for the Identification of Common Economic Aquatic
    Food Control 61 (2016) 79e91 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodcont DNA barcoding for the identification of common economic aquatic products in Central China and its application for the supervision of the market trade * Yanjun Shen a, b, Jingliang Kang a, b, Weitao Chen a, b, Shunping He a, a The Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, PR China b University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, PR China article info abstract Article history: Common economic aquatic products are important contributors to the human food supply. However, Received 30 May 2015 with the rapid globalization of the aquatic products industry, aquatic products market has become Received in revised form increasingly disordered. Therefore, an accurate and convenient method for identifying common eco- 4 August 2015 nomic aquatic products is important and necessary in many areas. DNA barcoding, which constitutes the Accepted 26 August 2015 analysis of a short fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequence, has Available online 21 September 2015 been widely used in species identification. To discriminate common economic aquatic species using DNA barcoding, we collected 534 COI barcode sequences of 66 common species consisting of 39 fish, 9 Keywords: fi DNA barcoding crustaceans and 18 mollusks. The intraspeci c genetic distances based on the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) fi Aquatic products model were less than 1.37% for sh, 7.32% for crustaceans and 3.40% for mollusks, whereas the intragenus Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I distances ranged from 3.91% to 13.82% for fish, 14.99%e16.17% for crustaceans and 14.82%e16.36% for K2P distance mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Limits and Phylogenetic Relationships of East Asian Fishes in the Subfamily Oxygastrinae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)
    Zootaxa 3681 (2): 101–135 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:64984E2C-1A9E-4086-9D47-74C5D31A4087 Limits and phylogenetic relationships of East Asian fishes in the subfamily Oxygastrinae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) KEVIN L. TANG1,14, MARY K. AGNEW2, M. VINCENT HIRT3,4, DANIEL N. LUMBANTOBING5,6, MORGAN E. RALEY7, TETSUYA SADO8, VIEW-HUNE TEOH9, LEI YANG2, HENRY L. BART10, PHILLIP M. HARRIS9, SHUNPING HE11, MASAKI MIYA8, KENJI SAITOH12, ANDREW M. SIMONS3,13, ROBERT M. WOOD2 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN2 1Department of Biology, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI 48502, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mails: [email protected] (MKA), [email protected] (LY), [email protected] (RMW), [email protected] (RLM) 3Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. E-mails: [email protected] (MVH), [email protected] (AMS) 4Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. 5Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 6Division of Fishes, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., 20013, USA. 7Nature Research Center, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27603, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 8Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, Chiba 260-8682, Japan. E-mails: [email protected] (TS), [email protected] (MM) 9Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
    [Show full text]