DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of South Sudan National Dialogue Steering Committee Sub-Committee for Upper Nile State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republic of South Sudan National Dialogue Steering Committee Sub-Committee for Upper Nile State REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN NATIONAL DIALOGUE STEERING COMMITTEE SUB-COMMITTEE FOR UPPER NILE STATE GRASS-ROOTS CONSULTATIONS FINAL REPORT DETAILS FOR UPPER NILE STATE December 2018 Report By: Sub-committee For Upper Nile State www.ssnationaldialogue.org National Dialogue is the Key to Peace, Stability and Economic Prosperity Healing Negotiation Reconciliation Mediation National Dialogue ACRONYMS CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement IDPs Internally displaced persons ND National Dialogue POC Protection of civilians UNMISS United Nations Mission in South Sudan UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Program 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 3 PART ONE ................................................................................................................................................... 6 THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 6 1.0 Introduction and background ............................................................................................................ 6 1.1 National Dialogue structure ................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Successes and challenges .................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Attendance List ................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Summary of the emerging Issues ...................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 13 PART TWO ............................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. DETAILED MINUTES OF THE ND SUB-COMMITEE MEETINGS ................................................ 15 2.1 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE, MALAKAL ....................................................................... 15 2.1.1 Consultative meeting with cabinet and legislature......................................................................... 15 2.1.2 Opening remarks ............................................................................................................................ 15 2.1.3 Open session: Cabinet and legislature meeting (Malakal) ............................................................. 16 2.1.4 Summary of emerging issues: Cabinet and legislature meeting (Malakal) .................................... 20 2.1.5 Recommendations: Cabinet and legislature meeting (Malakal) .................................................... 21 2.2 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE, MALAKAL ....................................................................... 21 2.2.1 Grass-root consultations with youth and women ........................................................................... 21 2.2.2 Opening Remarks ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.3 Open session: Women and youth (Malakal) .................................................................................. 22 2.2.4 Summary of emerging Issues: Women and youth (Malakal) ......................................................... 26 2.2.5 Recommendations: Women and youth (Malakal) .......................................................................... 27 2.3 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE, MALAKAL ....................................................................... 27 2.3.1 Consultative meeting with UNMISS leadership and other UN organs based in Malakal ............. 27 2.3.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 27 2.3.3 Open session: UNMISS leadership and other UN organs based in Malakal ................................. 28 2.3.4 Summary of emerging Issues: UNMISS leadership and other UN organs (Malakal) ................... 29 2.3.5 Recommendations: UNMISS leadership and other UN organs (Malakal) .................................... 29 3 2.4 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE, MALAKAL ....................................................................... 30 2.4.1 Consultative meeting with chiefs and elders .................................................................................. 30 2.4.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 30 2..4.3 Open session: Chiefs and elders meeting (Malakal) ..................................................................... 30 2.4.4 Summary of emerging Issues: Chiefs and elders meeting (Malakal) ............................................. 33 2.4.5 Recommendations: Chiefs and elders meeting (Malakal) ............................................................. 34 2.5 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE, MALAKAL ....................................................................... 34 2.5.1 Consultative meeting with the with UNMISS IDPS leadership .................................................... 34 2.5.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 34 2.5.3 Open session: UNMISS IDPs leaders meeting (Malakal) ............................................................. 35 2.5. 4 Summary of emerging Issues: UNMISS IDPs leaders meeting (Malakal) ................................... 37 2.5.5 Recommendations: UNMISS IDPs leaders meeting (Malakal) ..................................................... 38 2.6 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE, MALAKAL ....................................................................... 38 2. 6.1 Consultative meeting with Political parties .................................................................................. 38 2.6.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 38 2.6. 3 Open session: political parties’ meeting (Malakal) ....................................................................... 39 2.6.4 Summary of emerging issues: political parties meeting (Malakal) ................................................ 42 2.6.5 Recommendations: political parties’ meeting (Malakal) ............................................................... 42 2.7 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE-MALAKAL TOWN, SOUTHERN SECTOR.................... 43 2.7.1 Consultative meeting with the army and organized forces ..................................................... 43 2.7.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 43 2.7.3 Open session: Armed and organized forces meeting (Malakal Town, Southern Sector) ............... 44 2.7.4 Emerging issues: Armed and organized forces meeting (Malakal Town, Southern Sector) ......... 48 2.7.5 Recommendations: Armed and organized forces meeting (Malakal Town, Southern Sector) ...... 48 2. 8 CENTRAL UPPER NILE STATE, OGOT COUNTY .................................................................... 49 2.8.1 Consultative meeting with Chollo community .............................................................................. 49 2.8.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 49 2.8.3 Open session: Chollo community meeting (Ogot County) ............................................................ 50 2.8.4 Emerging Issues: Chollo community meeting (Ogot County) ....................................................... 54 2.8.5 Recommendations: Chollo community meeting (Ogot County) ................................................... 54 2.9 NORTHERN UPPER NILE STATE (NUNS) ................................................................................. 54 2.9.1 Consultative meeting with government officials and chiefs .......................................................... 55 2.9.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 55 2.9.3 Open session: Renk government officials meeting (Nuns) ............................................................ 55 4 2.9.4 Emerging Issues: Government officials and chiefs (Nuns) ............................................................ 57 2.9.5 Recommendations: Government officials and chiefs meeting (Nuns)........................................... 57 2.10 FASHODA STATE, MANYO COUNTY ...................................................................................... 58 2.10.1 Consultative meeting with Chollo community and state leadership ............................................ 58 2.10.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 58 2.10.3 Open session: Chollo community (Fashoda State, Manyo County) ...........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017
    Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017 SUDAN Introduction previous REACH assessments of hard-to- presence returned to the averages from April reach areas of Upper Nile State. (22% June, 42% May, 28% April).1 This may Despite a potential respite in fighting in lower MANYO be indicative of the slowing of movement due This Situation Overview outlines displacement counties along the western bank, dispersed to the rainy season. Although fighting that took RENK and access to basic services in Upper Nile fighting and widespread displacements trends place in Panyikang and Fashoda appeared to in June 2017. The first section analyses continued into June and impeded the provision subside, clashes between armed groups armed displacement trends in Upper Nile State. of primary needs and access to basic services groups reportedly commenced in Manyo and The second section outlines the population for assessed settlements. Only 45% of assessed Renk Counties, causing the local population to MELUT dynamics in the assessed settlements, as well settlements reported adequate access to food flee across the border as well as to Renk Town.2 and half reported access to healthcare facilities as access to food and basic services for both FASHODA These clashes may have also contributed to across Upper Nile State, while the malnutrition, MABAN IDP and non-displaced communities. MALAKAL a lack of IDPs, with no assessed settlement malaria and cholera concerns reported in May PANYIKANG BALIET Baliet, Maban, Melut and Renk Counties had in Manyo reporting an IDP presence in June, continued into June. LONGOCHUK less than 5% settlement coverage (Map 1), compared to 50% in May.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis in South Sudan
    Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Lauren Ploch Blanchard Specialist in African Affairs September 22, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43344 Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Summary South Sudan, which separated from Sudan in 2011 after almost 40 years of civil war, was drawn into a devastating new conflict in late 2013, when a political dispute that overlapped with preexisting ethnic and political fault lines turned violent. Civilians have been routinely targeted in the conflict, often along ethnic lines, and the warring parties have been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The war and resulting humanitarian crisis have displaced more than 2.7 million people, including roughly 200,000 who are sheltering at U.N. peacekeeping bases in the country. Over 1 million South Sudanese have fled as refugees to neighboring countries. No reliable death count exists. U.N. agencies report that the humanitarian situation, already dire with over 40% of the population facing life-threatening hunger, is worsening, as continued conflict spurs a sharp increase in food prices. Famine may be on the horizon. Aid workers, among them hundreds of U.S. citizens, are increasingly under threat—South Sudan overtook Afghanistan as the country with the highest reported number of major attacks on humanitarians in 2015. At least 62 aid workers have been killed during the conflict, and U.N. experts warn that threats are increasing in scope and brutality. In August 2015, the international community welcomed a peace agreement signed by the warring parties, but it did not end the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Pibor Administrative Area
    35 Real but Fragile: The Greater Pibor Administrative Area By Claudio Todisco Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2015 First published in March 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2E, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Emile LeBrun Copy-edited by Alex Potter ([email protected]) Proofread by Donald Strachan ([email protected]) Cartography by Jillian Luff (www.mapgrafix.com) Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Rick Jones ([email protected]) Printed by nbmedia in Geneva, Switzerland ISBN 978-2-940548-09-5 2 Small Arms Survey HSBA Working Paper 35 Contents List of abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR OPERATIONAL UPDATE 01/2017 01-15 January 2017
    UNHCR OPERATIONAL UPDATE 01/2017 01-15 January 2017 HIGHLIGHTS KEY FIGURES Maban IDP assessment undertaken after December Unrest: In Maban, UNHCR, and partners Humanitarian Development Consortium (HDC), WFP and South Sudan Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (RRC) forged a multi-functional team and INSIDE SOUTH SUDAN conducted a rapid need assessment to the areas hosting IDPs. On the riverbank site, the team identified 1,207 households consisting of 6,053 individuals displaced from two different communities from Doro and Tweji living in the open. The team visited the 262,560 second IDP site Haj Stipta which is hosting 348 households consisting of 1,923 Refugees in South Sudan individuals. Main priority findings included food, NFIs, and shelters. UNHCR extends relief support to vulnerable groups in Upper Nile: In 1.853 M Malakal’s Protection of Civilians site (PoC), UNHCR and its partners Humanitarian Development Consortium (HDC) and Danish Refugee Council (DRC) distributed IDPs in South Sudan, including hygiene kits including soaps and towels to 1,360 Persons with Specific Needs (PSNs). 204,370 people in UNMISS UNHCR and its partners HDC and Samaritan’s Purse also distributed NFIs to 2,464 Protection of Civilians site IDPs, including blankets, plastic sheets, mosquito nest, kitchen sets and sleeping mats for the newly displaced population from Tweji. US $172 million UNHCR distributes Fuel-Efficient Stoves to refugees in Unity: In Ajuong Thok, UNHCR distributed 1,500 Fuel Efficient Stoves (FES) to refugee 730 households. These Funding requested for comprehensive stoves will reduce the frequency of firewood collection thereby enabling refugees to do needs in 2017 other domestic duties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]
  • National Education Statistics
    2016 NATIONAL EDUCATION STATISTICS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FEBRUARY 2017 www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education & Instruction 2017 Photo Courtesy of UNICEF This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. The map used in this document is not the official maps of the Republic of South Sudan and are for illustrative purposes only. This publication has been produced with financial assistance from the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) and technical assistance from Altai Consulting. Soft copies of the complete National and State Education Statistic Booklets, along with the EMIS baseline list of schools and related documents, can be accessed and downloaded at: www.southsudanemis.org. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director of Planning and Budgeting / MoGEI [email protected] Giir Mabior Cyerdit / EMIS Manager / MoGEI [email protected] Data & Statistics Unit / MoGEI [email protected] Nor Shirin Md. Mokhtar / Chief of Education / UNICEF [email protected] Akshay Sinha / Education Officer / UNICEF [email protected] Daniel Skillings / Project Director / Altai Consulting [email protected] Philibert de Mercey / Senior Methodologist / Altai Consulting [email protected] FOREWORD On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am delighted to present The National Education Statistics Booklet, 2016, of the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). It is the 9th in a series of publications initiated in 2006, with only one interruption in 2014, a significant achievement for a new nation like South Sudan. The purpose of the booklet is to provide a detailed compilation of statistical information covering key indicators of South Sudan’s education sector, from ECDE to Higher Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Vistas) Q3 Fy 2017 Quarterly Report April 1– June 30, 2017
    VIABLE SUPPORT TO TRANSITION AND STABILITY (VISTAS) Q3 FY 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 1– JUNE 30, 2017 JUNE 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by AECOM. VIABLE SUPPORT TO TRANSITION AND STABILITY (VISTAS) Q2 FY 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 1 – JUNE 30, 2017 Contract No. AID-668-C-13-00004 Submitted to: USAID South Sudan Prepared by: AECOM International Development Prepared for: Office of Transition and Conflict Mitigation (OTCM) USAID South Sudan Mission American Embassy Juba, South Sudan DISCLAIMER: The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Q3 FY 2017 Quarterly Report | Viable Support to Transition and Stability (VISTAS) i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1 II. Political And Security Landscape .................................................................................... 2 National Political and Security Landscape ..................................................................................................... 2 Political & Security Landscape in VISTAS Regional Offices ...................................................................... 3 III. Program Strategy.............................................................................................................. 6 IV. Program Highlights ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan 2015 Human Rights Report
    SOUTH SUDAN 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY South Sudan is a republic operating under a transitional constitution signed into law upon declaration of independence from Sudan in 2011. President Salva Kiir Mayardit, whose authority derives from his 2010 election as president of what was then the semiautonomous region of Southern Sudan within the Republic of Sudan, led the country. While the 2010 Sudan-wide elections did not wholly meet international standards, international observers believed Kiir’s election reflected the will of a large majority of Southern Sudanese. International observers considered the 2011 referendum on South Sudanese self-determination, in which 98 percent of voters chose to separate from Sudan, to be free and fair. President Kiir is a founding member of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) political party, the political wing of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA). Of the 27 ministries, only 21 had appointed ministers in charge, of which 19 are SPLM representatives. The bicameral legislature consists of 332 seats in the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), of which 296 were filled, and 50 seats in the Council of States. SPLM representatives controlled the vast majority of seats in the legislature. Through presidential decrees Kiir replaced eight of the 10 state governors elected since 2010. The constitution states that an election must be held within 60 days if an elected governor has been relieved by presidential decree. This has not happened. The legislature lacked independence, and the ruling party dominated it. Civilian authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over the security forces. In 2013 armed conflict between government and opposition forces began after violence erupted within the Presidential Guard Force (PG) of the SPLA, also known as the Tiger Division.
    [Show full text]
  • C the Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan
    C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their gratitude to the following persons (from State Ministries of Livestock and Fishery Industries and FAO South Sudan Office) for collecting field data from the sample counties in nine of the ten States of South Sudan: Angelo Kom Agoth; Makuak Chol; Andrea Adup Algoc; Isaac Malak Mading; Tongu James Mark; Sebit Taroyalla Moris; Isaac Odiho; James Chatt Moa; Samuel Ajiing Uguak; Samuel Dook; Rogina Acwil; Raja Awad; Simon Mayar; Deu Lueth Ader; Mayok Dau Wal and John Memur. The authors also extend their special thanks to Erminio Sacco, Chief Technical Advisor and Dr Abdal Monium Osman, Senior Programme Officer, at FAO South Sudan for initiating this study and providing the necessary support during the preparatory and field deployment phases. DISCLAIMER FAO South Sudan mobilized a team of independent consultants to conduct this study. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. COMPOSITION OF STUDY TEAM Yacob Aklilu Gebreyes (Team Leader) Gezu Bekele Lemma Luka Biong Deng Shaif Abdullahi i C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...I ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... VI NOTES ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp By
    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT PEACE IS THE NAME OF OUR CATTLE-CAMP LOCAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT IN EASTERN LAKES STATE, SOUTH SUDAN SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES PROJECT Peace is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp Local responses to conflict in Eastern Lakes State, South Sudan JOHN RYLE AND MACHOT AMUOM Authors John Ryle (co-author), Legrand Ramsey Professor of Anthropology at Bard College, New York, was born and educated in the United Kingdom. He is lead researcher on the RVI South Sudan Customary Authorities Project. Machot Amuom Malou (co-author) grew up in Yirol during Sudan’s second civil war. He is a graduate of St. Lawrence University, Uganda, and a member of The Greater Yirol Youth Union that organised the 2010 Yirol Peace Conference. Abraham Mou Magok (research consultant) is a graduate of the Nile Institute of Management Studies in Uganda. Born in Aluakluak, he has worked in local government and the NGO sector in Greater Yirol. Aya piŋ ëë kͻcc ἅ luël toc ku wεl Ɣͻk Ɣͻk kuek jieŋ ku Atuot akec kaŋ thör wal yic Yeŋu ye köc röt nͻk wεt toc ku wal Mith thii nhiar tͻͻŋ ku ran wut pεεc Yin aci pεεc tik riεl Acin ke cam riεlic Kͻcdit nyiar tͻͻŋ Ku cͻk ran nͻk aci yͻk thin Acin ke cam riεlic Wut jiëŋ ci riͻc Wut Atuot ci riͻc Yok Ɣen Apaak ci riͻc Yen ya wutdie Acin kee cam riεlic ëëë I hear people are fighting over grazing land. Cattle don’t fight—neither Jieŋ cattle nor Atuot cattle. Why do we fight in the name of grass? Young men who raid cattle-camps— You won’t get a wife that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentiu and Malakal Poc Sites’
    Conflict Sensitivity Analysis: United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) Protection of Civilian (PoC) Sites Transition: Bentiu, Unity State, and Malakal, Upper Nile State Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility March 2021 This Conflict Sensitivity Analysis (CSA) was requested by the Inter-Cluster Coordination Group in October 2020 and examines the conflict sensitivity implications of the transition of UN Protection of Civilian sites in Bentiu, Unity State, and Malakal, Upper Nile State, from sites under the protection of United Nations Mission in South Sudan to camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs) under the jurisdiction of the Government of the Republic of South Sudan. The Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility is intended to support conflict-sensitive aid programming in South Sudan. The Facility is funded by the UK, Swiss, Dutch and Canadian donor missions in South Sudan and is implemented by a consortium of NGOs including Saferworld and swisspeace. Conflict Sensitivity Analysis: Malakal and Bentiu PoC sites Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Overview .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]