DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan July-August 2017 Introduction SUDAN SUDAN at the time, mainly in the south-eastern portion of the state (Maiwut, Longochuk, Nasir, Ulang), Between July and August 2017, the revival of MANYO MANYO which facilitates the provision of information conflict and increased insecurity has disrupted RENK RENK from these areas which are known to have livelihoods, access to services and humanitarian access difficulties and information gaps at assistance in Upper Nile state. Moreover, the moment. However, the central part of the insecurity has caused further displacement MELUT MELUT state (Maban, Melut, Baliet, Renk) was not into Ethiopia and Sudan with continued internal assessed and the western bank had only FASHODA MABAN FASHODA MABAN displacement inside Upper Nile State. one county where over 5% of all settlements MALAKAL MALAKAL To inform the response of humanitarian actors PANYIKANG BALIET PANYIKANG BALIET were assessed (Fashoda). In August, REACH working outside of formal displacement sites, LONGOCHUK LONGOCHUK interviewed KIs from all 12 counties. However, LUAKPINY/ LUAKPINY/ only three counties exceeded a 5% settlement REACH has been conducting an ongoing NASIR NASIR assessment of hard-to-reach areas in South ULANG MAIWUT ULANG MAIWUT coverage in the western bank of the Nile Sudan since 2015, for which data on settlements (Manyo, Fashoda and Panyikang) and one across Greater Upper Nile, Greater Equatoria county in the south-eastern part of the state and Western Bahr el Ghazal region is collected Assessed settlements (Maiwut). Given this geographical shift in areas on a monthly basis. ettlement covered between July and August this report Cover ercentage of assessed settlements relative to the CHA (CD) total dataset: does not purport to study trends between July Between July and August 2017, REACH Map 1:0 REACH assessment coverage of Upper Nile State, July 2017 (left), August (right). and August. However, as July coverage was interviewed 190 Key Informants (KIs) from 01 - 491 relatively similar to June coverage, observations 126 settlements in all 12 counties in Upper - 10 on state-level trends between June and July Nile State. In order to ensure an accurate hard-to-reach101 - 20 areas of Upper Nile State. collection sites between July and August, the 201 - 0 coverage of counties where REACH has have been included in this report. understanding of current displacement and This Situation Overview outlines displacement 0 been able to assess over 5% of known population dynamics, all selected KIs had up- and access to basic services in Upper Nile in Population Movement and settlements differed considerably between to-date information about the village from which July and August 2017. The first section analyses July and August (Map 1). Counties where Displacement they had been displaced, whether because they displacement trends in Upper Nile State. the proportion of total settlements assessed had reportedly visited the Area of Knowledge The second section outlines the population Displacement within the state of Upper Nile has is below 5% are not analysed at the county (AoK) within the last month or had been in dynamics in the assessed communities, as well been dynamic in July and August (see Map 2) level, but the settlement data is still included contact with someone livng in the AoK within as access to food and basic services for both as illustrated by 51% of assessed settlements in the state-level analysis. For July, settlement the last month. Findings have been triangulated IDP and non-displaced communities. reporting an IDP presence in their area in using KIs with humanitarian actors, secondary coverage included areas where fighting was August. A large proportion of IDPs reportedly Due to changes in the selection of data data, and previous REACH assessments of more intense and displacement was ongoing crossed the border to Ethiopia during the period : following clashes in the south-eastern part of Simultaneously, insecurity also reportedly METHODOLOGY the state in July, and others fled to Sudan due flared up at the end of July in Kaka, Manyo To provide an overview of the situation in to insecurity along the western bank in August.1 County, which reportedly led even more largely inaccessible areas of Upper Nile 2 Displacement largely affected populations people to move toward Sudan as well as State, REACH uses primary data provided that were already displaced (e.g. Aburoc toward neighbouring Malakal.5 Apart from this by key informants who have recently arrived, displacement site), which illustrates that as movement, however, the entries and exits from or receive regular information, from their pre- insecurity continues there has been a relative the Malakal Protection of Civilians (PoC site) displacement location or “Area of Knowledge”. shrinking of safe spaces for IDPs within Upper largely stabilised following an outbound trend Information for this report was collected from Nile as insecurity progresses. that lasted from February 2017 to June 2017, key informants in Renk County, Upper Nile, Displacement in and out of Upper Nile when the population of the site had decreased Akobo, Jonglei State, and Juba Protection of from approximately 30,000 people to 24,000.6 7 Civilians (PoC) site in July and August 2017. Displacement from Longochuk and Maiwut Displacement around Maban The first phase of the assessment Following clashes along the Mathiang-Pagak Through July and August a dispute between methodology comprised a participatory corridor in Longochuk and Maiwut in July, IDPs different communities began to build up in the mapping exercise to map the relevant and local communities were displaced and Maban area, which resulted in the evacuation settlements in Upper Nile State. In-depth moved toward Pagak, with an estimated 5000 Map 2: Displacement from Longochuk County, of 27 humanitarian personnel from the interviews were then conducted with selected people crossing the border with Ethiopia in the July 2017, and from Aburoc and Kaka, August area.8 Driven by insecurity in Maban, a small participants using a standardised survey early stages of the armed clashes in the area.3 2017. proportion of the population appeared to be tool comprising questions on displacement Most crossed the border due to the combined leaving towards Sudan, as REACH recorded a was insecurity, as 38% of assessed settlements trends, population needs, and access to effect of persisting insecurity and the lack of few arrivals from the Kilo 10 area in Renk town without adequate access to food reported that basic services. humanitarian assistance in Pagak following the in August. it was too unsafe to access land for cultivation After data collection was completed, all evacuation of most relocatable humanitarian in their area in July. Destruction of crops data was examined at the settlement level, workers in early July. In Maiwut County, where Situation in Assessed by fighting was the second most frequently and settlements were assigned the modal Pagak is located, 61% of assessed settlements Settlements cited reason (36%) for the lack of food in the response. When no consensus could be reported that 50% or more of the population settlements that reported inadequate access found for a settlement, that settlement had left their settlement in July, with the figure Food security to food, which reinforces the hypothesis that was not included in reporting. Descriptive increasing to 80% in August, suggesting that Ongoing insecurity, coupled with the peak persisting insecurity in Upper Nile was the statistics and geospatial analysis were then continued fighting in and around Pagak through of lean season in July, led to an increasing main factor preventing households (HHs) from used to analyse the data. that month has forced more populations to proportion of assessed settlements accessing food over the period. Please note that REACH is in the process leave their area. reporting inadequate access to food. While of establishing sustained data collection in Displacement along the western bank 46% of assessed settlements had reported Access to food in south-eastern counties Upper Nile State. As a result, the current having adequate access to food in June, this Indicative of a lack of normal sources of food coverage is limited. The conclusions drawn Renewed insecurity in Aburoc resulted in figure dropped to 27% in July. due to disruption of livelihoods by insecurity, are therefore indicative of likely trends in the further displacement from Fashoda toward the majority of settlements in both Maiwut and state. Manyo County and Sudan in July and August.4 The most frequently cited reason for low levels of adequate access to food across Upper Nile Longuchuk were reporting reliance on foraging 2 1. OCHA. Flash Update. 7 July 2017. 5. OCHA. Humanitarian bulletin. Issue 11. 15 September 2017. 2. OCHA. Humanitarian snapshot. July, August 2017. 6. IOM. DTM Malakal PoC. August 2017. 3. OCHA. Humanitarian bulletin. Issue 11. 15 September 2017. 7. Ibid. 4. OCHA. Humanitarian snapshot. August 2017. 8. WHO. Upper Nile Weekly Update. 7-16 August. as their main source of food (71% and 57% of Figure 1: Top three reported reasons for lack following a trend of decline in adequate size portions. Moreover, 49% of assessed assessed settlements respectively). While the of food in settlements that reported inadequate food access over the previous months. The settlements with inadequate access to food consumption of wild fruits is indeed seasonal food access, August 2017 insecurity that was prevalent in this area reported that households were purchasing less between February and May likely led to the expensive food at the market as opposed to during the lean season in the area, such high Unsafe to plant 47% reliance on foraging as a primary source of depletion of food reserves through frequent only 23% of assessed settlements reporting the Crops destroyed by fighting 33% food is indicative of a depletion of alternative displacement and looting and halted cultivation same coping strategy in June, thus suggesting food sources, likely as a result of continued Food distribution stopped 7% in many areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 18 June 2018
    SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 18 June 2018 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; Abyei Area: SSNBS, 1 December 2008; Ilemi triangle status and South Sudan/Sudan border status: UN Cartographic Section, October 2011; incident data: ACLED, June 2018; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 18 JUNE 2018 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Battles 604 300 3351 Conflict incidents by category 2 Violence against civilians 404 299 1348 Development of conflict incidents from 2012 to 2017 2 Strategic developments 120 0 0 Riots/protests 46 1 3 Methodology 3 Remote violence 25 3 17 Conflict incidents per province 4 Non-violent activities 1 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 1200 603 4719 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, June 2018). Disclaimer 5 Development of conflict incidents from 2012 to 2017 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, June 2018). 2 SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 18 JUNE 2018 Methodology an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province is known.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017
    Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017 SUDAN Introduction previous REACH assessments of hard-to- presence returned to the averages from April reach areas of Upper Nile State. (22% June, 42% May, 28% April).1 This may Despite a potential respite in fighting in lower MANYO be indicative of the slowing of movement due This Situation Overview outlines displacement counties along the western bank, dispersed to the rainy season. Although fighting that took RENK and access to basic services in Upper Nile fighting and widespread displacements trends place in Panyikang and Fashoda appeared to in June 2017. The first section analyses continued into June and impeded the provision subside, clashes between armed groups armed displacement trends in Upper Nile State. of primary needs and access to basic services groups reportedly commenced in Manyo and The second section outlines the population for assessed settlements. Only 45% of assessed Renk Counties, causing the local population to MELUT dynamics in the assessed settlements, as well settlements reported adequate access to food flee across the border as well as to Renk Town.2 and half reported access to healthcare facilities as access to food and basic services for both FASHODA These clashes may have also contributed to across Upper Nile State, while the malnutrition, MABAN IDP and non-displaced communities. MALAKAL a lack of IDPs, with no assessed settlement malaria and cholera concerns reported in May PANYIKANG BALIET Baliet, Maban, Melut and Renk Counties had in Manyo reporting an IDP presence in June, continued into June. LONGOCHUK less than 5% settlement coverage (Map 1), compared to 50% in May.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis in South Sudan
    Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Lauren Ploch Blanchard Specialist in African Affairs September 22, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43344 Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Summary South Sudan, which separated from Sudan in 2011 after almost 40 years of civil war, was drawn into a devastating new conflict in late 2013, when a political dispute that overlapped with preexisting ethnic and political fault lines turned violent. Civilians have been routinely targeted in the conflict, often along ethnic lines, and the warring parties have been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The war and resulting humanitarian crisis have displaced more than 2.7 million people, including roughly 200,000 who are sheltering at U.N. peacekeeping bases in the country. Over 1 million South Sudanese have fled as refugees to neighboring countries. No reliable death count exists. U.N. agencies report that the humanitarian situation, already dire with over 40% of the population facing life-threatening hunger, is worsening, as continued conflict spurs a sharp increase in food prices. Famine may be on the horizon. Aid workers, among them hundreds of U.S. citizens, are increasingly under threat—South Sudan overtook Afghanistan as the country with the highest reported number of major attacks on humanitarians in 2015. At least 62 aid workers have been killed during the conflict, and U.N. experts warn that threats are increasing in scope and brutality. In August 2015, the international community welcomed a peace agreement signed by the warring parties, but it did not end the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Force Protection Map As of October 2018 White Nile Sennar
    South Sudan: Force Protection map as of October 2018 White Nile Sennar The map is shown where the road require force protection for convoy and access denied. Girbanat ! Renk Manyo ! Dakona! SUDAN ! El-galhak Renk ! Kaka Melut ! ! Paloich ! Melut ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wuntau ! ! ! ! ! ! Yida ! ! ! o Adar Bunj ! ! ! ! ! Fashoda o ! Rom ! Pariang ! ! ! ! ! Guel Guk an ! Kodok! Mab ! Malakal ! ! ! ! Akoka ! ! ! ! ! ! Biu Panyikang ! ! ! Agarak ! ! Malual ! Abiemnhom Tonga ! P ! ! o ! Malakal Baliet ! ! ! ! ! Abiemnom ! Wath Wang! Kech ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Banglai ! Aweil North ! Pul Luthni Pakoi ! Baliet Aweil ! ! !! ! Udier Bentiu Keew ! Nyinthok Gok-machar ! East Twic ! P Longochuk ! Mayom o ! Guit ! Chotbora Raga ! Wanyjok Akoc Rubkona Paguir Canal/Pigi ! Chuei ! ! Mayom ny ! Turalei ! Luakpi Warweng Chelkou Yargot ! Guit Kuon ! ! Pakor Wunrok Nhialdu ! Toch ! Aweil West ! ! Mayenjur k igi Mutthiang Fanga Canal/P ! Dome ! Nasir ! ! Ying Juong Aweil Gogrial Gogrial ! ! Nyadin ! Aroyo P ! Dindin Duar Pagil West East ! ! Ulang Maiwut Gossinga ! ! Buaw Nyirol ! Aweil Koch ! ! ! Nasser ! Gabir ! ! Liet-nhom ! Kandag! ! South ! Nyirol ! Haat ! Lankien ! ! Gogrial Ulang ! Raja Elok ! Koch Kosho ! Pagak ! ! Kull Bukteng ! AweilC entre Bar Mayen PKuajok Akop !o!Leer ! ! Ghanna Lunyaker Mayendit ! Walgak Thonyor ! Adok Ayod Pulchuol ! ! Ayod Tanyang ! Rualbet Mayendit! Jwong ! Pathai ! ! Yieth-liet Warrap ! ! ! ! Kaikuiny ! ! Sopo ! Thar-kueng ! Leer Wanding Pabuong ETHIOPIA Tonj ! Romich ! Kier Madol ! ! North !
    [Show full text]
  • RVI Local Peace Processes in Sudan.Pdf
    Rift Valley Institute ﻤﻌﻬﺪ اﻷﺨدود اﻟﻌﻇﻴم Taasisi ya Bonde Kuu ySMU vlˆ yU¬T tí Machadka Dooxada Rift 东非大裂谷研究院 Institut de la Vallée du Rift Local Peace Processes in Sudan A BASELINE STUDY Mark Bradbury John Ryle Michael Medley Kwesi Sansculotte-Greenidge Commissioned by the UK Government Department for International Development “Our sons are deceiving us... … Our soldiers are confusing us” Chief Gaga Riak Machar at Wunlit Dinka-Nuer Reconciliation Conference 1999 “You, translators, take my words... It seems we are deviating from our agenda. What I expected was that the Chiefs of our land, Dinka and Nuer, would sit on one side and address our grievances against the soldiers. I differ from previous speakers… I believe this is not like a traditional war using spears. In my view, our discussion should not concentrate on the chiefs of Dinka and Nuer, but on the soldiers, who are the ones who are responsible for beginning this conflict. “When John Garang and Riek Machar [leaders of rival SPLA factions] began fighting did we understand the reasons for their fighting? When people went to Bilpam [in Ethiopia] to get arms, we thought they would fight against the Government. We were not expecting to fight against ourselves. I would like to ask Commanders Salva Mathok & Salva Kiir & Commander Parjak [Senior SPLA Commanders] if they have concluded the fight against each other. I would ask if they have ended their conflict. Only then would we begin discussions between the chiefs of Dinka and Nuer. “The soldiers are like snakes. When a snake comes to your house day after day, one day he will bite you.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA-BASED ASSESSMENT in AREAS of RETURN OCTOBER 2019 Renk Town, Renk County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan
    AREA-BASED ASSESSMENT IN AREAS OF RETURN OCTOBER 2019 Renk Town, Renk County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan CONTEXT ASSESSED LOCATION Renk Town is located in Renk County, Upper Nile State, near South Sudan’s border SUDAN Girbanat with Sudan. Since the formation of South Sudan in 2011, Renk Town has been a major Gerger ± MANYO Renk transit point for returnees from Sudan and, since the beginning of the current conflict in Wadakona 1 2013, for internally displaced people (IDPs) fleeing conflict in Upper Nile State. RENK Renk was classified by the Integrated Phase Classification (IPC) Analysis Workshop El-Galhak Kurdit Umm Brabit in August 2019 as Phase 4 ‘Emergency’ with 50% of the population in either Phase 3 Nyik Marabat II 2 Kaka ‘Crisis’ (65,997 individuals) or Phase ‘4’ Emergency’ (28,284 individuals). Additionally, MELUT Renk was classified as Phase 5 ‘Extremely Critical’ for Global Acute Malnutrition MABAN (GAM),3 suggesting the prevalence of acute malnutrition was above the World Health Kumchuer Organisation (WHO) recommended emergency threshold with a recent REACH Multi- Suraya Hai Sector Needs Assessment (MSNA) establishing a GAM of above 30%.4 A measles Soma outbreak was declared in June 2019 and access to clean water was reportedly limited, as flagged by the Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) and by international NGOs 4 working on the ground. Hai Marabat I Based on the convergence of these factors causing high levels of humanitarian Emtitad Jedit Musefin need and the possibility for larger-scale returns coming to Renk County from Sudan, REACH conducted this Area-Based Assessment (ABA) in order to better understand White Hai Shati the humanitarian conditions in, and population movement dynamics to and from, Renk N e l Town.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Pibor Administrative Area
    35 Real but Fragile: The Greater Pibor Administrative Area By Claudio Todisco Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2015 First published in March 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2E, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Emile LeBrun Copy-edited by Alex Potter ([email protected]) Proofread by Donald Strachan ([email protected]) Cartography by Jillian Luff (www.mapgrafix.com) Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Rick Jones ([email protected]) Printed by nbmedia in Geneva, Switzerland ISBN 978-2-940548-09-5 2 Small Arms Survey HSBA Working Paper 35 Contents List of abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision South Sudan ECHO FOOD VOUCHER RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT
    1 | P a g e World Vision South Sudan ECHO FOOD VOUCHER RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT JUNE 2014 By: Bernard D. Togba Jr. Francis Thomas Mogga World Vision South Sudan 2 | P a g e Table of Contents Topic Page List of Tables……………………………………………………………………….………………….. 3 List of Acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………… 4 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………..……………… 5 2. Objectives……………………………………………………………………………….…………. 6 3. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………….………. 6 3.1. Sample………………………………………………………………………………………….7 3.2. Data Management & Analysis………………………………………………………………….. 7 3.3. Limitations……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 4. Overview of Towns…………………………………………………………………………………. 8 4.1. Overview of Malakal…………………………………………………………………………… 8 4.2. Overview of Renk………………………………………………………………………………. 8 4.3. Overview of Kodok…………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.4. Overview of Lul……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.5. Food Availability……………..…………………………………………………………………. 11 5. Summary Results………………………………………………………………………………………11 5.1. Key Informants……………………..……………………………………………………………..11 5.2. Traders…………………………………………………………………………………………….12 5.2.1. Business & Supply………………………………………………………………………. 13 5.2.2. Payment & Transport…………………………….……………………………………. 17 5.3. Beneficiaries………………………………………………………..…………………………….. 19 5.3.1. IDPs Perception…………………………….……..…………………………………… 19 5.3.2. General Characteristics………………………………………………………………….19 5.3.3. Household Welfare & Vulnerability………………………………..…………………… 19 6. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………… 22 World Vision South Sudan 3 | P
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS UPDATE September 2014
    SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS UPDATE September 2014 SUDAN Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Melut Borders (MSF) has more than 3,300 local Yida Upper Maban staff and 350 international staff working in Abyei Nile Pamat Agok Malakal State Northern ETHIOPIA South Sudan and the neighbouring countries Bentiu Bahr Unity El Ghazal as part of its response to the humanitarian Aweil Leer Gogrial Jikmir Pagak Lankien Kuacjok crisis. Letchuor Mayendit Yuai Itang Warrap Tiergol Western Wau Bahr Nyal El Ghazal Jonglei At present, MSF operates 25 projects in 8 Lakes Rumbek states of South Sudan, including Unity, Upper CENTRAL Lekuongole Pibor AFRICAN Bor Gumuruk Nile and Jonglei states where the conflict REPUBLIC Western Awerial Equatoria has taken a particularly heavy toll on the Eastern population. Teams are responding to various Equatoria health needs including surgery, obstetrics, Yambio Juba Torit Central Equatoria Nadapal malaria, kala azar, vaccinations against- Existing intervention Nimule preventable diseases and malnutrition. Barutuku KENYA Dzaipi New intervention Nyumanzi DEMOCRATIC Ayilo Refugee Camps MSF calls on all parties to respect medical REPUBLIC UGANDA Violence in hospitals OF CONGO facilities, to allow aid organisations access to Directly aected by violence affected communities and to allow patients Indirectly aected by violence 0 100 200 km to receive medical treatment irrespective of Population migration 0 100 mi their origin or ethnicity. MSF in Numbers 15 December 2013–September 2014 498,495 29,919 2,888 12,702 11,587 Outpatient Consultations Inpatient Admissions War Wounded Treated Deliveries Children Received Nutrition of which of which and treatment as Outpatients 202,187 15,101 3,378 6,170 2,468 Children admitted to Inpatient Surgeries Performed Vaccinations Children Under 5 years Children Under 5 years Therapeutic Feeding Centres Nutrition Data in the above table from March 2014 to August 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Affairs Summary Action Report (01 March-20 April 2018)
    Civil Affairs Division Reporting Period: 01 March– 20 April 2018 Greater Bahr el Ghazal Actions Sports for peace, Raja, Lol State, 14-16 April Context: The creation of Lol State under the 28 state model, carved out of the areas that were formerly part of Northern and Western Bahr el Ghazal states, has been a source of polarized relations between Fertit and Dinka Malual communities. The Fertit opposed the formation of the new state on the basis that they would be marginalized by the larger Dinka Ma- 7 lual population. 4 Action: Recognizing the significant role youth play in communal con- flict and the importance of leveraging their role toward improved social relations, CAD Aweil FO in partnership with the Lol State Ministry of Information, Culture, Youth and Sports, organised a two-day football tour- nament in Raja, Lol State, to facilitate communal linkages and promote 2 coexistence between Fertit and Dinka Malual. The event featured the par- ticipation of over 60 Fertit youth from Raja, and Dinka Malual youth from Aweil North County (10 women participated). The Acting Governor, Speaker of State Legislative Assembly, Minister of Information, Culture community of NBeG held separate pre-migration conferences with Misser- and Youth, Minister of Education and SPLM commander of the area also iya and Rezeigat pastoralists from Sudan in Wanyjok, Aweil East, and attended the event and urged peaceful coexistence. Nymlal, Lol State, respectively. In both conferences, they reached a num- Impact: The participants expressed hope that the event will open ave- ber of resolutions, which are recognized as binding on the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]