DOCSLIB.ORG

National Education Statistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Education Statistics 2016 NATIONAL EDUCATION STATISTICS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FEBRUARY 2017 www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education & Instruction 2017 Photo Courtesy of UNICEF This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. The map used in this document is not the official maps of the Republic of South Sudan and are for illustrative purposes only. This publication has been produced with financial assistance from the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) and technical assistance from Altai Consulting. Soft copies of the complete National and State Education Statistic Booklets, along with the EMIS baseline list of schools and related documents, can be accessed and downloaded at: www.southsudanemis.org. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director of Planning and Budgeting / MoGEI [email protected] Giir Mabior Cyerdit / EMIS Manager / MoGEI [email protected] Data & Statistics Unit / MoGEI [email protected] Nor Shirin Md. Mokhtar / Chief of Education / UNICEF [email protected] Akshay Sinha / Education Officer / UNICEF [email protected] Daniel Skillings / Project Director / Altai Consulting [email protected] Philibert de Mercey / Senior Methodologist / Altai Consulting [email protected] FOREWORD On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am delighted to present The National Education Statistics Booklet, 2016, of the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). It is the 9th in a series of publications initiated in 2006, with only one interruption in 2014, a significant achievement for a new nation like South Sudan. The purpose of the booklet is to provide a detailed compilation of statistical information covering key indicators of South Sudan’s education sector, from ECDE to Higher Education. It reports the results of the data gathered from the Annual Education Census (AEC) carried out by the Data and Statistics Unit (DSU) of the Directorate of Planning and Budgeting of the MoGEI, which operates the Education Management Information System (EMIS), in collaboration with State Ministries of Education (SMoE). In order to plan and manage our education system effectively, South Sudan needs reliable and credible data. We need information about how the system is developing and changing over time, how learning outcomes and gender disparities vary across the country and how South Sudan compares vis-à-vis its neighbours or countries facing similar socio-economic situations. The General Education Act, 2012, makes specific provisions in this regard: Section 8 (1): The National Ministry of General Education shall exercise and carry out the following roles and functions: (O) Conduct educational research to determine the quality of education system in South Sudan and use the results of such research findings for planning purposes. EMIS provides systematic and quality knowledge to education stakeholders about the status of the education system as a whole and the learning outcomes in the country and, in so doing, assists the Government of South Sudan (GoSS) to identify education needs and priorities, and to design appropriate interventions. EMIS also assists the Ministry and other relevant agencies by providing critical information to monitor our performance against the key indicators of the Education for All (EFA) and the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Enrolment and intake rates, student-teacher ratios, gender parity, and access to learning materials, among other data, can help the government and development agencies to identify where to most effectively allocate limited resources in the face of competing priorities. This publication would not have been possible without the cooperation and support from the SMoE, County and Payam Education Offices, and all the schools, centres, institutions, colleges, and universities across the RSS. I want to seize this opportunity to commend the dedication, hard work and professionalism of the EMIS team and State Focal Points, County Education Directors, Payam Supervisors, and Head Teachers, which were crucial in increasing the education census coverage and in assuring the quality of the information gathered. We also thank our partners, especially the Global Partnership for Education (GPE), UNICEF and Altai Consulting for their continuous support in improving South Sudan’s EMIS. Sincerely, Deng Deng Hoc Yai Minister of General Education and Instruction TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 What is EMIS ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Relevance ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 2016 Annual Education Census ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. About the MoGEI ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. History of EMIS ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3. EMIS Process................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.4. Limitations of the National Education Statistics Booklet ..................................................................................... 9 1.5. How to Read the Data in this National Education Statistics Booklet ................................................................... 10 1.6. About the 2016 State Booklets ...................................................................................................................... 11 2. DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Indicator Used to Measure Coverage ............................................................................................................. 12 2.2. Indicators Used to Measure Access ................................................................................................................ 12 2.3. Indicators Used to Measure Student Flow....................................................................................................... 13 2.4. Indicator Used to Measure Gender Parity ....................................................................................................... 14 2.5. Indicators Used to Measure Resource ............................................................................................................ 14 3. 2016 DATA .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1. Schools ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1. Number and % of schools per school type and ownership type, 2016 ....................................................... 15 3.1.2. Number and % of AES schools by programme and ownership type, 2016 ................................................. 16 3.1.3. Number and % of Primary and Secondary schools by state and ownership, 2016 ...................................... 17 3.2. Access ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 3.2.1. Number and % of students per school type and gender, 2016 ................................................................. 18 3.2.2. Number and % of students by gender and state, 2016 ............................................................................ 19 3.2.3. Enrolment rates for Primary and Secondary school, 2015 and 2016 .......................................................... 20 3.2.4. Enrolment rates for Primary schools by former state, 2016 ...................................................................... 20 3.2.5. Enrolment rates for Secondary schools by former state, 2016 .................................................................. 20 3.3. Student Flow ............................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.1. Number of repeaters and repetition rate by class and gender, 2015 ......................................................... 21 3.3.2. Number and dropout rate per class and gender, 2015 ............................................................................. 22 3.3.3. Number and dropout rate by state and gender, 2015 .............................................................................. 23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of South Sudan "Establishment Order
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN "ESTABLISHMENT ORDER NUMBER 36/2015 FOR THE CREATION OF 28 STATES" IN THE DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE SYSTEM IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN Order 1 Preliminary Citation, commencement and interpretation 1. This order shall be cited as "the Establishment Order number 36/2015 AD" for the creation of new South Sudan states. 2. The Establishment Order shall come into force in thirty (30) working days from the date of signature by the President of the Republic. 3. Interpretation as per this Order: 3.1. "Establishment Order", means this Republican Order number 36/2015 AD under which the states of South Sudan are created. 3.2. "President" means the President of the Republic of South Sudan 3.3. "States" means the 28 states in the decentralized South Sudan as per the attached Map herewith which are established by this Order. 3.4. "Governor" means a governor of a state, for the time being, who shall be appointed by the President of the Republic until the permanent constitution is promulgated and elections are conducted. 3.5. "State constitution", means constitution of each state promulgated by an appointed state legislative assembly which shall conform to the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011, amended 2015 until the permanent Constitution is promulgated under which the state constitutions shall conform to. 3.6. "State Legislative Assembly", means a legislative body, which for the time being, shall be appointed by the President and the same shall constitute itself into transitional state legislative assembly in the first sitting presided over by the most eldest person amongst the members and elect its speaker and deputy speaker among its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Peacebuilding- the Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan
    SPECIAL REPORT Strategic Peacebuilding The Role of Civilians and Civil Society in Preventing Mass Atrocities in South Sudan The Cases of the SPLM Leadership Crisis (2013), the Military Standoff at General Malong’s House (2017), and the Wau Crisis (2016–17) NYATHON H. MAI JULY 2020 WEEKLY REVIEW June 7, 2020 The Boiling Frustrations in South Sudan Abraham A. Awolich outh Sudan’s 2018 peace agreement that ended the deadly 6-year civil war is in jeopardy, both because the parties to it are back to brinkmanship over a number S of mildly contentious issues in the agreement and because the implementation process has skipped over fundamental st eps in a rush to form a unity government. It seems that the parties, the mediators and guarantors of the agreement wereof the mind that a quick formation of the Revitalized Government of National Unity (RTGoNU) would start to build trust between the leaders and to procure a public buy-in. Unfortunately, a unity government that is devoid of capacity and political will is unable to address the fundamentals of peace, namely, security, basic services, and justice and accountability. The result is that the citizens at all levels of society are disappointed in RTGoNU, with many taking the law, order, security, and survival into their own hands due to the ubiquitous absence of government in their everyday lives. The country is now at more risk of becoming undone at its seams than any other time since the liberation war ended in 2005. The current st ate of affairs in the country has been long in the making.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017
    Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017 SUDAN Introduction previous REACH assessments of hard-to- presence returned to the averages from April reach areas of Upper Nile State. (22% June, 42% May, 28% April).1 This may Despite a potential respite in fighting in lower MANYO be indicative of the slowing of movement due This Situation Overview outlines displacement counties along the western bank, dispersed to the rainy season. Although fighting that took RENK and access to basic services in Upper Nile fighting and widespread displacements trends place in Panyikang and Fashoda appeared to in June 2017. The first section analyses continued into June and impeded the provision subside, clashes between armed groups armed displacement trends in Upper Nile State. of primary needs and access to basic services groups reportedly commenced in Manyo and The second section outlines the population for assessed settlements. Only 45% of assessed Renk Counties, causing the local population to MELUT dynamics in the assessed settlements, as well settlements reported adequate access to food flee across the border as well as to Renk Town.2 and half reported access to healthcare facilities as access to food and basic services for both FASHODA These clashes may have also contributed to across Upper Nile State, while the malnutrition, MABAN IDP and non-displaced communities. MALAKAL a lack of IDPs, with no assessed settlement malaria and cholera concerns reported in May PANYIKANG BALIET Baliet, Maban, Melut and Renk Counties had in Manyo reporting an IDP presence in June, continued into June. LONGOCHUK less than 5% settlement coverage (Map 1), compared to 50% in May.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis in South Sudan
    Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Lauren Ploch Blanchard Specialist in African Affairs September 22, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43344 Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Summary South Sudan, which separated from Sudan in 2011 after almost 40 years of civil war, was drawn into a devastating new conflict in late 2013, when a political dispute that overlapped with preexisting ethnic and political fault lines turned violent. Civilians have been routinely targeted in the conflict, often along ethnic lines, and the warring parties have been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The war and resulting humanitarian crisis have displaced more than 2.7 million people, including roughly 200,000 who are sheltering at U.N. peacekeeping bases in the country. Over 1 million South Sudanese have fled as refugees to neighboring countries. No reliable death count exists. U.N. agencies report that the humanitarian situation, already dire with over 40% of the population facing life-threatening hunger, is worsening, as continued conflict spurs a sharp increase in food prices. Famine may be on the horizon. Aid workers, among them hundreds of U.S. citizens, are increasingly under threat—South Sudan overtook Afghanistan as the country with the highest reported number of major attacks on humanitarians in 2015. At least 62 aid workers have been killed during the conflict, and U.N. experts warn that threats are increasing in scope and brutality. In August 2015, the international community welcomed a peace agreement signed by the warring parties, but it did not end the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector
    The Criminalization of South Sudan’s Gold Sector Kleptocratic Networks and the Gold Trade in Kapoeta By the Enough Project April 2020* A Precious Resource in an Arid Land Within the area historically known as the state of Eastern Equatoria, Kapoeta is a semi-arid rangeland of clay soil dotted with short, thorny shrubs and other vegetation.1 Precious resources lie below this desolate landscape. Eastern Equatoria, along with the region historically known as Central Equatoria, contains some of the most important and best-known sites for artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASM). Some estimates put the number of miners at 60,000 working at 80 different locations in the area, including Nanaknak, Lauro (Didinga Hills), Napotpot, and Namurnyang. Locals primarily use traditional mining techniques, panning for gold from seasonal streams in various villages. The work provides miners’ families resources to support their basic needs.2 Kapoeta’s increasingly coveted gold resources are being smuggled across the border into Kenya with the active complicity of local and national governments. This smuggling network, which involves international mining interests, has contributed to increased militarization.3 Armed actors and corrupt networks are fueling low-intensity conflicts over land, particularly over the ownership of mining sites, and causing the militarization of gold mining in the area. Poor oversight and conflicts over the control of resources between the Kapoeta government and the national government in Juba enrich opportunistic actors both inside and outside South Sudan. Inefficient regulation and poor gold outflows have helped make ASM an ideal target for capture by those who seek to finance armed groups, perpetrate violence, exploit mining communities, and exacerbate divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report Issue # 23
    Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency type: Humanitarian crises Issue #: 23 Reporting Weeks: 26 & 27 Dr. Guracha, WHO OIC giving remarks during official launch of MDA by MOH in Juba Date: 24 June – 7 July 2019 .Photo: WHO JuPhoto information & photo credit Humanitarian Situation Update in South Sudan 7.1 M Need 1.9 M Internally 2.3M South Sudanese in Humanitarian Displaced Persons other countries Assistance with 0.2M living in PoC’s 6.96 M 860K 596K Malnourished Severely Food Malnourished Women Insecure Children Key Bi-Weekly Highlights Acute malnutrition 860,000 Acutely Malnourished 1 case of EVD was confirmed in Ariwara in Ituri Province of the DRC, 70 Kms from South 57 Stabilization Centers Sudan’s Kaya border in Yei River State. Cumulative vaccination WHO Rapid Response Team deployed to 182, 223 vaccinated with OPV Vaccine Nimule & Yei to strengthen EVD 167, 363 Vaccinated with Measles preparedness following confirmation of EVD case, 70 KMs from South Sudan’s Border. 7, 783 vaccinated against meningitis MOH & WHO in collaboration with the Ministry of Education jointly launched Public health threats country wide Mass Drug Administration in Juba targeting 1.5 million children. 02 EVD Alerts reported in Yei on 5 & 6 July 2019. MOH, WHO & partners conduct Training of Trainers on Severe Acute Malnutrition with 01 Suspected Cholera case reported in Juba Medical Complication. Protection of Civilians Site (POC3). PCR machine installed at the National Public Health Laboratory in Juba. Sample tested invalid -sent to UVRI for confirmation. 1 Virus Disease Overview of the Humanitarian Situation: humanitarian crises Almost 7 million people facing critical lack of food: 6.96 million (61% of population) people face acute food insecurity in South Sudan– according to UN sources.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan's
    Untapped and Unprepared Dirty Deals Threaten South Sudan’s Mining Sector April 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Invitation to Exploitation 4 Beneath the Battlefield: Mineral Development During Conflict 12 Indications of Possible Money Laundering 19 Recommendations 20 We are grateful for the support we receive from our donors who have helped make our work possible. To learn more about The Sentry’s funders, please visit The Sentry website at www.thesentry.org/about/. UNTAPPED AND UNPREPARED: DIRTY DEALS THREATEN SOUTH SUDAN’S MINING SECTOR TheSentry.org Executive Summary South Sudan’s mining sector has seen rapid development in recent years, and preliminary reports suggest that the industry could become an engine for major economic growth. However, ineffective accountability mechanisms, an opaque corporate landscape, and inadequate due diligence have exposed the sector to abuse by bad actors within South Sudan’s ruling clique. The Sentry has found that existing laws have proven insufficient bulwarks against abuse, raising concerns that the country’s mineral wealth could do little more than spur the kind of violent competition that has ravaged the oil sector. Although South Sudan took welcome steps to reform the mining sector in 2012, some government officials, their relatives, and their close associates have fostered a weak regulatory environment susceptible to exploitation. In one example of how the privileged few have apparently exploited kleptocratic arrangements, President Salva Kiir’s daughter partly owns a company with three active licenses, while another company with three licenses lists former Vice President James Wani Igga’s son as a shareholder. Ashraf Seed Ahmed Hussein Ali, a businessman commonly known as Al-Cardinal who was placed under Global Magnitsky sanctions in October 2019, reportedly owns the company currently holding the greatest number of licenses.1 In the gold-rich region of Kapoeta, state government officials have begun issuing licenses independently of the central government.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Final Evaluation for “'I Love My Country': Strategic
    Combined Final Evaluation for “‘I Love My Country’: Strategic Communications for Peace Building in South Sudan” & Baseline Evaluation for “‘I Love My Country’: Promoting Localized Understanding and Peaceful Coexistence in South Sudan May 2017 Legal Notice and Disclaimer Photo courtesy of Search for Common Ground, https://www.sfcg.org/communicating-for-peace-in-south-sudan/ This report is not a legally binding document. It is a collaborative informational and assessment document and does not necessarily reflect the views of any of the contributing partners or funding agencies in all of its contents. Any errors are the sole responsibility of the authors. Copyright 2017 Forcier and Search for Common Ground. Forcier thanks our colleagues at Search for Common Ground for their cooperation and support with the Acknowledgments baseline evaluation of “‘I Love My Country’: Promoting Localized Understanding for Peaceful Coexistence” and the final evaluation of “‘I Love My Country’: Strategic Communications for Peace Building in South Sudan” as well as local residents from Bor, Juba and Mingkaman who took part in the research as survey enumerators and participants. 2| SFCG: Strategic Communications for Peace Building in South Sudan Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera Response Updates RSS 30May17
    Republic of South Sudan CHOLERA RESPONSE UPDATES AS OF 30 MAY 2017 Overall coordination of the cholera response at the national level is coordinated by the National cholera taskforce to review outbreak trends and progress of implementation activities. Sub-national cholera taskforce committees are coordinating the cholera response in locations with active transmission including Yirol East and Yirol West, Bor, Duk, Kapoeta South, Kapoeta North, and Kapoeta East. Surveillance and case management updates As part of the ongoing surveillance, new cholera alerts have been detected and reported from Tonj East and Rumbek North. The Ministry of Health with support from WHO and other Health and WASH cluster agencies have under taken the following activities in the newly affected areas and in other locations with active transmission: • The Ministry of Health with support from WHO and partners has deployed cholera response teams that are coordinating the Health and WASH response in Mingkaman, Duk, Tonj East, Kapoeta South, Kapoeta North, and Kapoeta East; and Rumbek North. • Cholera case investigation and sample collection kits continue to be deployed by WHO to support the investigation and response activities in newly affected areas and locations with active cholera transmission. • Cholera case management kits have been deployed by WHO and Unicef to support the response in Ayod, Tonj East, Kapoeta South, Kapoeta North, and Kapoeta East. Oral cholera vaccination As part of the ongoing cholera response, cholera vaccines have been deployed in Leer, Bor PoC, Malakal Town, Bentiu PoC, Mingkaman IDP settlement, and Aburoc IDPs. All these sites are not reporting cholera cases with the exception of Aburoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Affairs Summary Action Report (01 March-20 April 2018)
    Civil Affairs Division Reporting Period: 01 March– 20 April 2018 Greater Bahr el Ghazal Actions Sports for peace, Raja, Lol State, 14-16 April Context: The creation of Lol State under the 28 state model, carved out of the areas that were formerly part of Northern and Western Bahr el Ghazal states, has been a source of polarized relations between Fertit and Dinka Malual communities. The Fertit opposed the formation of the new state on the basis that they would be marginalized by the larger Dinka Ma- 7 lual population. 4 Action: Recognizing the significant role youth play in communal con- flict and the importance of leveraging their role toward improved social relations, CAD Aweil FO in partnership with the Lol State Ministry of Information, Culture, Youth and Sports, organised a two-day football tour- nament in Raja, Lol State, to facilitate communal linkages and promote 2 coexistence between Fertit and Dinka Malual. The event featured the par- ticipation of over 60 Fertit youth from Raja, and Dinka Malual youth from Aweil North County (10 women participated). The Acting Governor, Speaker of State Legislative Assembly, Minister of Information, Culture community of NBeG held separate pre-migration conferences with Misser- and Youth, Minister of Education and SPLM commander of the area also iya and Rezeigat pastoralists from Sudan in Wanyjok, Aweil East, and attended the event and urged peaceful coexistence. Nymlal, Lol State, respectively. In both conferences, they reached a num- Impact: The participants expressed hope that the event will open ave- ber of resolutions, which are recognized as binding on the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Response Plan Humanitarian
    HUMANITARIAN 2019 RESPONSE PLAN MONITORING REPORT JANUARY-MARCH 2019 AFGHANISTAN SOUTH SUDAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGES IN CONTEXT Key developments 02 Rising food insecurity 02 Fluid population movements 02 Improving humanitarian access 03 Evolving health risks 03 Timeline 04 01 REVIEW OF NEEDS People in need 05 Intersectoral severity of needs ������������������������������������������������������������������ 06 REVIEW OF RESPONSE People targeted and reached by state 07 Highlight of achievements 08 ACHIEVEMENTS AGAINST THE PLAN People reached 09 Funding received 09 Progress towards strategic objectives 10 ChanGES IN ConteXT CHANGES IN CONTEXT Key developments In January, 6.2 million people – 54 per cent of the population – were estimated to face ‘Crisis’ food insecurity (IPC Phase 3) or As anticipated, South Sudan remained in the grip of a serious worse, even in the presence of humanitarian food assistance. humanitarian crisis through the first quarter of 2019. The Out of these, 1.4 million people faced ‘Emergency’ (IPC Phase effects of years of conflict, displacement and lack of basic 4) food insecurity and 30,000 faced ‘Catastrophe’ (IPC Phase services continued to be felt throughout the country. Some 7.2 5). These 30,000 most vulnerable people were found in four million people needed assistance, up from 7.1 million estimated counties: Canal/Pigi and Pibor in Jonglei, Panyikang in Upper in the 2019 Humanitarian Needs Overview. Nile, and Cueibet in Lakes. The number of severely food The prolonged disruptions to food production meant that insecure people in January was nearly a million people more than hunger continued to rise across South Sudan. Health risks the 5.3 million living in the same conditions in January 2018.
    [Show full text]