Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport Into a Three-Runway System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report on the 2007 Village Representative Election
111 Appendix XI(A) (Page 1/20) 2007 Village Representative Election Results for RR Elections Number of Votes District/ Candidate Number received Result of Rural Name of Village and as Election Committee Candidate Name Declared by RO ISLANDS Lamma Island Ko Long ─ LAU CHI YUEN ─ Uncontested (North) Lo Tik Wan ─ NG CHONG YIP ─ Uncontested Pak Kok Kau Tsuen ─ CHAN KWOK KIN ─ Uncontested Pak Kok San Tsuen ─ CHOW CHEUNG YAU ─ Uncontested Sha Po ─ MA CHING WAH ─ Uncontested Tai Peng Tsuen ─ WONG KING CHEE ─ Uncontested Tai Wan Kau Tsuen ─ CHAN KAM PANG ─ Uncontested Tai Wan San Tsuen ─ CHAN WAI LUN ALAN ─ Uncontested Tai Yuen ─ CHOW WING CHUNG ALAN ─ Uncontested Wang Long ─ CHOW KWOK KWONG ─ Uncontested Yung Shue Long ─ WONG KING CHUEN ─ Uncontested Yung Shue Wan 1 YU LAI FAN 153 Elected 2 FONG MAN SANG 26 3 NG TAM HING 82 Lamma Island Lo So Shing (South) Luk Chau Mo Tat ─ CHAN KAM WAH ─ Uncontested Mo Tat Wan Po Toi Sok Kwu Wan 1 WONG MING TAT 21 2 LAI MUN MING 42 Elected Tung O Yung Shue Ha Mui Wo Chung Hau (North) 1 WONG FUK KAN 151 Elected 2 YUEN YUK KAU 140 Chung Hau (South) 1 CHUI PUI MAN WENDY 252 Elected 2 HO KAM HO 100 Luk Tei Tong 1 LI KWOK KEUNG 99 Elected 2 KAM CHI SHING 84 Man Kok Tsui Ngau Kwu Long Pak Mong ─ KWOK SHU YUNG ─ Uncontested Pak Ngan Heung ─ WONG WAI KIT ─ Uncontested Tai Ho ─ HO TIN SHUNG ─ Uncontested Tai Tei Tong ─ WONG CHAU FUK ─ Uncontested Wo Tin 1 TANG KA HUNG 12 Elected 2 HO HUNG CHAN 10 Peng Chau Nim Shu Wan ─ WONG SIU NGOK ─ Uncontested 112 Appendix XI(A) (Page 2/20) Number of Votes District/ Candidate Number -
Legco Letter 22 April
CB(1)1429/08-09(01) Hon Cheung Hok-ming, SBS, JP Chairman Panel on Transport Legislative Council Legislative Council Building 8 Jackson Road, Central Hong Kong Dear Mr. Cheung, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge (‘HZMB’) and public opposition to the Hong Kong Link Road (‘HKLR’) route The purpose of this letter is to urgently bring to the attention of the Panel on Transport the extent of public opposition to the proposed route of the HKLR of the HZMB after the bridge ‘lands’ in Hong Kong territory. Tung Chung Sustainable Development and other local organisations working to promote sustainable development have voiced concerns to the Highways Department regarding the impact of the proposed HKLR route and made counter proposals for a viable alternative. We request the Legislative Council Panel on Transport to urgently review the counter proposal and take account of the public opposition to the road route proposed by the Highways Department. Details of the negative impact of the HD / Arup proposed route for the HKLR for the HZMB are in the attached documents. Most importantly, the proposed route will have a huge negative impact on the health of local residents because of the proximity of vehicle emissions from a major highway. As management professionals we favour sustainable development and do not appose the construction of the HZMB, but we do object to the proposed route. We urge you to table the details of the no pollution solution to the Panel on Transport during your meeting on Friday 24th April. Yours sincerely, (Martin Purbrick) for Tung Chung Sustainable Development Alliance c.c. -
The Conservation Programme for the Chinese White Dolphin in Hong Kong
The Conservation Programme for the Chinese White Dolphin in Hong Kong Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................2 II. SPECIES OVERVIEW ...................................................................................4 1. DISTRIBUTION .....................................................................................................4 2. ABUNDANCE .......................................................................................................4 3. HOME RANGE AND GROUP SIZE..........................................................................4 4. BEHAVIOUR ........................................................................................................5 5. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................5 6. FEEDING AND REPRODUCTION ............................................................................5 7. THREATS.............................................................................................................5 III. HUMAN IMPACTS.........................................................................................7 1. HABITAT LOSS AND DISTURBANCE .....................................................................7 2. POLLUTION .........................................................................................................7 3. DEPLETION OF FOOD RESOURCES .......................................................................8 -
Fisheries – Survey Results
Annex 10C Fisheries – Survey Results 10C.1 SURVEY RESULTS 10C.1.1 INTRODUCTION This Annex presents the results of the adult fish production survey, ichthyoplankton and fish post-larvae survey, and vessel survey conducted to characterize the existing conditions of fisheries resources at selected locations within the Assessment Area. The methodology for the surveys is described in detail in Annex 10B. 10C.1.2 SURVEY SCHEDULE In accordance with the agreed methodology, fisheries surveys were carried out from October 2016 to July 2017 and the survey schedule is summarized in Table 10C.1.1. All surveys were conducted during daytime at each of the selected locations. During the course of the survey, sea conditions were mild to moderate and weather conditions were fine in general. Table 10C.1.1 Marine Fisheries Baseline Surveys Survey Frequency Date Wet Season Dry Season Adult fish production Monthly over a 20, 24 & 28 Oct 2016 16, 17 & 21 Nov 2016 survey duration of 9 months, 3, 5 & 6 Apr 2017 12, 13 & 14 Dec 2016 from October 2016 to 17, 18 & 19 May 2017 4, 5 & 6 Jan 2017 June 2017 (inclusive) 15, 19 & 20 Jun 2017 8, 10 & 13 Feb 2017 8, 9 & 10 Mar 2017 Ichthyoplankton and Monthly over a 19, 20 & 21 Apr 2017 18, 22 & 23 Nov 2016 Fish Post-larvae duration of 9 months, 24, 25 & 26 May 2017 19, 21 & 23 Dec 2016 Survey from November 2016 21, 22 & 23 Jun 2017 16, 17 & 18 Jan 2017 to July 2017 18, 19, & 20 Jul 2017 20, 21 & 22 Feb 2017 (inclusive) 20, 21 & 22 Mar 2017 Vessel Survey Monthly over a 20, 24 & 28 Oct 2016 16, 17 & 21 Nov 2016 duration of -
Temporal and Spatial Characterization of Acoustic Activity Patterns of Indo-Pacific Humpback
Temporal and spatial characterization of acoustic activity patterns of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis chinensis) in Hong Kong waters By Erin K. Schormans A Thesis Submitted to Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Applied Science. Halifax, Nova Scotia © Erin K. Schormans, 2021 Approved: Dr. Timothy Frasier Supervisor Approved: Dr. Colleen Barber Committee member Approved: Dr. Hal Whitehead Committee member Approved: Dr. Sofie Van Parijs External examiner Date: January 28, 2021 1 Temporal and spatial characterization of acoustic activity patterns of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis chinensis) in Hong Kong waters by Erin K. Schormans Abstract Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins face a number of serious anthropogenic pressures in Hong Kong waters. Since the late 1990’s, data has shown both a decline in their abundance and shift in their distribution, therefore obtaining a better understanding of their habitat use through passive acoustic monitoring is important. Twelve C-PODs deployed throughout their habitat from June 2018-July 2019 were able to provide data on diel, seasonal and geographical patterns in their acoustic activity; and location had the largest effect on the probability of detections. When acoustic and visual data were compared to characterize the ability of the C-PODs to detect dolphins and assess the relative efficacy of each detection method, little overlap was found between methods. Despite these limitations, the C-PODs are able to survey continuously and simultaneously over many areas and represent a valuable tool for long-term monitoring. January 28, 2021 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my supervisor Tim Frasier. -
Paper No. 03/2014 8 March 2014
(Translated Version) For discussion on LanDAC Paper No. 03/2014 8 March 2014 First Meeting of Lantau Development Advisory Committee Agenda Item 4: Development Potentials and Constraints of Lantau 1. Purpose This paper aims at introducing the development potentials and constraints of Lantau. 2. Present Situation 2.1 Lantau is the largest island in Hong Kong covering a land area of about 147 km2 (excluding its nearby islands and the airport), of which about 102 km2 (about 70%) is country parks. Lantau comprises mainly undeveloped, natural coastal areas and inland mountainous terrains. At present, Lantau has a population of about 105 000 (based on the 2011 Census), mainly in Tung Chung New Town, Discovery Bay, Mui Wo, the rural township of Tai O and the rural settlements in South Lantau. 2.2 There are a number of strategic economic and urban infrastructure developments in northern Lantau including the Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA), AsiaWorld-Expo and Tung Chung New Town as well as the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) and the Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLKL) under construction. 2.3 Eastern Lantau is a tourist, leisure and recreation hub with facilities including the Hong Kong Disneyland Theme Park, the Inspiration Lake and hotels. On the other hand, the southern and western Lantau mainly consist of rural areas and rural townships such as Mui Wo, Tai O, traditional villages etc. as well as diversified tourist attractions including Ngong Ping (Translated Version) 2 360, Po Lin Monastery, Big Buddha, Wisdom Path, country parks, country trails, beaches at the coast of southern Lantau etc. -
Drawing No. MCL/P132/EIA/13-012
Tsing Shan Siu On Sha Po Kong LUNG KWU TAN Tsuen Court 583 CASTLE PEAK Tuk Mei Chi Lok Chung San Shek Wan Fa Yuen San Tsuen Lung Tsai 517 Lung Mun 268 Oasis Sw P Tsui Ning Garden Siu Lun Court Glorious Garden Golf Course Henford Garden SAM SHING HUI Sam Shing Estate San Shek Wan San Tsuen Phase ll Wu Shan Tap Shek Kok Recreation Playground Shek Kok CASTLE PEAK BEACH Tsui Tuen Mun So Kwun Wat Ser Res Siu Shan Court Typhoon Shelter Tsuen s“ LUNG KWU CHAU Coal Depot 249 Butterfly Estate Power Station Wu King Estate Yuet Wu Melody Siu Hei Villa Garden Butterfly Beach Park Court Coal Depot 5 68 Cement Works So Kwun » Tan Ferry Pier ¶“ SIU LANG SHUI Ser Res Hong Kong Gold Coast Tai Lam Chung Tsuen PILLAR POINT Sewage Treatment (MONG HAU SHEK) Works Siu Lam San Tsuen HKSAR BOUNDARY F¤w‹˛⁄s“„ SHA CHAU AND LUNG KWU CHAU MARINE PARK ¥ PAK CHAU 55 LEGEND: PROPOSED LAND FORMATION FOOTPRINT OBSERVATION RANGE (1km) OBSERVATION RANGE (2km) F¨ SHA CHAU OBSERVATION RANGE (3km) 17 A D LAND BASED SURVEY LOCATION p¤i SIU MO TO 6 øªÁ Cheung Sok Tsui 30 øª 6 CHEUNG SOK U¤¤ Ha Kok Tsui j¤p¤ LUK KENG BAY j¤i THE BROTHERS TAI MO TO ‡ 6 Luk Keng YAM TSAI WAN YAN O WAN ±³ Yam Tsai ˝… 67 TSZ KAN CHAU ·¥ Ta Pang Po YªD YAN O TUK Fª t A ¨¤w‹Œ Tung Yip Hang Ser Res AsiaWorld-Expo ‘† j¤ Sham Shui Kok TAI SHAN |¥ B SZE PAK AU È«B¹ SKYCITY Ferry Terminal 263 p† LAI PIK SHAN »›·Œ “‚” T⁄ Golf Course SAM PAK AU Hong Kong International Airport j¤| È«B¹ TAI CHE TUNG Passenger Terminal o´ 302 Water Treatment Works ˆƒ⁄B Sewage Treatment SZE PAK WAN –– Works T¤ Control Tower -
Proposed Comprehensive Residential and Commercial Development Atop Siu Ho Wan Depot VISUAL SENSITIVE RECEIVERS PLAN
y r a ound N B IO T D T R C A E e A S O C S R K E ng R - I a · U R EET N T P Tuen Mun North ° U 00 A 579 K « N M 3 IN O HO Fresh Water Ser Res I I Ø T N G on T SEC K- O 100 « ª µ K C i ng » KIN WONG L e «Ø© T C F ³ A N - i S A T A ª R I R W N ¥ E g e r T T F ¬ T 00 ¥ US ± T 5 T e i µ U T AT S © UNG µ S I S T e ú Á L s S KIN WONG « à E S 400 F Ø© T E E T ¥ R S C t N O R R ST Û R T T ª ¸ I F T ONG IL EET C RA I O S M K Ò T A P RE A L ON A TU n ¹ NA L I I F M V S A ¦ A ON I L I 2 O m TA R L T A a I ± R 00 KIN FAT L H T T A «Øµ L A ¤ « M ¶ E Æ M a E V S h N T R ¶ P A I L HO L I ¬ E i Ø F S K § L j C I e ³ ¤¸¥ C O Æ I l N À P Ë ¹ A C N ù Y A M R « I E ¤ E A A A A ¤ Ð v «Øº K 54 R j TS K T ª M N ± T i · T § ® AR L « UNG Ä ng ¢ M T I V 251 F Æ ¤ C OUSE i i O R j µ K OK C t º ¤ ¤ T ¨ Ù A Å LO ION D N Æ - n « I s ¸ KI Ø j FIRE OSEH N K T N Ô ¨ WI º U ¤ 40 R e ´ T ® a N G I ¤ · A T Ø LE I S - K ¤jÆV¥ 0 T L O M C © r M N A « ¥ ° S M « ¤ G Ø ¯ N D KIN KWAN AN t S º  ¤ ¬ OA T YE I N G R ¯¬ µ U K E NG C K s YAN U I N CH 200 IN R H i ¦ G T ¨ S U T U 3 432 I 00 Ø M N n ® z O I i « N TAI LAM COUNTRY PARK T Ø ² C ª E 300 m M ³ ´ ³ E « U Á ¼w Á S T d PUI e ¬ ± ³ 3 ¹ TO ¯ HAN S R S A OAD ª µ E m AN N · ® AI L Ù F ½ Y ¯ D I ROA - l C O ¤ s K ¨ T I T K 200 a U P N S ¤ L ·s C i ¥ YA A R · 0 c C · 0 s N 300 T S ¤ L 4 D s ¦ ¸ I · A ª E ACLEHO e « ´ M S RA T N T R E U Ù R T ¤ S ¨ O p T ¤ÙªùªF•¹ ¤ E P U G ¶ F I Ù « « ¤ ¤ Tuen Mun East S L NG N E ST ¤ P G M T Ù Fresh Water Ser Res UN U N L N UE U ¶ A ¶ HO T E S Ù C E ³ ê N L A N I N A ¼ S S RC H I S µ A HUN -
1. INTRODUCTION Background to the Study 1.1 a Doppler VHF Omni
1. INTRODUCTION Background To The Study 1.1 A Doppler VHF Omni-directional Range and Distance Measuring Equipment (DVOR/DME) Station is being operated on Lung Kwu Chau to provide bearing and distance information to the approaching/departing aircrafts to and from the Chek Lap Kok Airport. The existing jetty at Lung Kwu Chau, which is ruined and abandoned for use, is too small and of too shallow water depth to accommodate the Civil Aviation Department’s (CAD) vessels for transporting equipment and personnel for servicing and maintaining the DVOR/DME. Currently, the transportation has to rely on helicopters, which is however prohibited during night times and adverse weather conditions. In order that emergency repair work can be undertaken during such periods, CAD has proposed to construct a proper jetty for berthing of marine vessels. The construction work will be implemented under the project, namely “Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty” (hereinafter referred to as “ the Project”). 1.2 Maunsell Consultants Asia Ltd have been commissioned by the Civil Engineering Department (CED) of the Hong Kong SAR Government to undertake the EIA Study of the Project. In accordance with the EIA Study Brief, an initial assessment of the environmental impacts arising from the Project was firstly undertaken to identify those environmental issues of key concern during the construction and operation phases of the Project that require further more detailed assessment. The findings of the initial assessment were presented in the Final Initial Assessment Report (IAR) submitted on 16 May 2001. A detailed assessment of all the key issues identified in the IAR has followed after the consultation exercise with the Lung Kwu Tan villagers, relevant government departments and the Marine Parks Committee, and confirmation of the preferred jetty location. -
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Location and Scale of Project 2.1 the Proposed Site of the Project Is Located on the Eastern Coast Of
Agreement No. CE 55/2000 EIA Study For Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty Civil Engineering Department Final EIA Report 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Location and Scale of Project 2.1 The proposed site of the Project is located on the eastern coast of Lung Kwu Chau as shown in Figure 2.1. Lung Kwu Chau is situated within the gazetted Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park. Due to the remoteness of the site, the island is uninhabited with no infrastructure other than the existing jetty and the Doppler VHF Omni-directional Range and Distance Measuring Equipment (DVOR/DME) Station. The location of the existing jetty is also shown on Figure 2.1. 2.2 The scope of this project comprises the construction of a precast concrete blockwork jetty and a concrete catwalk, dredging of an approach channel, installation of miscellaneous facilities and demolition of the existing jetty. 2.3 A jetty was constructed at nearby Sha Chau to serve the radar station set up by CAD on the island for the new airport at Chek Lap Kok. To date it appears that no environmental concerns have been raised in connection with the operation of this radar station and the assoc iated jetty, which is also located within the Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park. The structural form of the Sha Chau jetty is similar to that proposed under the preliminary design of the jetty at Lung Kwu Chau, although the jetty at Sha Chau is larger in size. A jetty has also been provided at Siu Mo To to serve the DVOR/DME station located there. -
RECLAMATION OUTSIDE VICTORIA HARBOUR and ROCK CAVERN DEVELOPMENT
Enhancing Land Supply Strategy RECLAMATION OUTSIDE VICTORIA HARBOUR and ROCK CAVERN DEVELOPMENT Strategic Environmental Assessment Report - Reclamation Sites Executive Summary Civil Engineering Development Department Agreement No. 9/2011 Increasing Land Supply by Reclamation and Rock Cavern Development cum Public Engagement - Feasibility Study SEA Report - Reclamation Sites (Executive Summary) Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Project Background 3 1.2 Objectives of Assignment 3 1.3 SEA and Objectives of SEA 4 1.4 Disclaimer 4 2 Overall Site Selection Methodology 5 3 Review of Previous Studies and Constraints 6 3.1 Constraints and Considerations 6 3.2 SEA/Environmental Considerations in the Identification of Pre-longlisted Reclamation Sites 8 4 Stage 1 Public Engagement and Formulation of Site Selection Criteria (SSC) 11 4.1 Stage 1 Public Engagement 11 4.2 Site Selection Criteria 11 4.3 SEA/Environmental Comments 12 4.4 Other Comments 12 4.5 SEA/Environmental Observations 13 5 Selection of Longlisted Sites 14 5.1 Site Longlisting Methodology 14 5.2 Initial Site Selection Criteria 14 5.3 SEA/Environmental Findings in the Longlisting Process for Reclamation 16 6 Broad Environmental Assessments 19 6.1 Broad Environmental Assessments 19 6.2 Key Environmental Issues of Longlisted Sites 19 6.3 Overall Strategic Environmental Findings of the Longlisted Reclamation Sites 27 7 Site Shortlisting and Key Environmental Issues and Opportunities of the Shortlisted Sites and Artificial Islands 30 7.1 Site Shortlisting Methodology 30 7.2 Site Shortlisting with SEA/Environmental Considerations 30 7.3 Shortlisted Sites, Artificial Islands and Key Environmental Issues and Opportunities 31 REP/98/01 | Rev 11 | SEA REPORT - RECLAMATION (EXECUTIVE SUMMARY) V11 WITH CEDD MARKED UP.DOCX Civil Engineering Development Department Agreement No. -
CHAPTER 2 Environment Bureau Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Environmental Protection Department Food and En
CHAPTER 2 Environment Bureau Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Environmental Protection Department Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Leisure and Cultural Services Department Government’s efforts in tackling shoreline refuse Audit Commission Hong Kong 28 October 2020 This audit review was carried out under a set of guidelines tabled in the Provisional Legislative Council by the Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee on 11 February 1998. The guidelines were agreed between the Public Accounts Committee and the Director of Audit and accepted by the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Report No. 75 of the Director of Audit contains 10 Chapters which are available on our website at https://www.aud.gov.hk Audit Commission 26th floor, Immigration Tower 7 Gloucester Road Wan Chai Hong Kong Tel : (852) 2829 4210 Fax : (852) 2824 2087 E-mail : [email protected] GOVERNMENT’S EFFORTS IN TACKLING SHORELINE REFUSE Contents Paragraph EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 – 1.12 Audit review 1.13 General response from the Government 1.14 Acknowledgement 1.15 PART 2: MONITORING OF SHORELINE CLEANLINESS 2.1 – 2.3 BY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT Inspection of coastal sites 2.4 – 2.18 Audit recommendations 2.19 Response from the Government 2.20 Protocol for handling surge of marine refuse 2.21 – 2.25 Audit recommendation 2.26 Response from the Government 2.27 PART 3: CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS BY AGRICULTURE, 3.1 FISHERIES AND CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT Monitoring of clean-up operations 3.2 – 3.7 — i —