3 WATER QUALITY IMPACT Introduction 3.1 Lung Kwu Chau Is

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3 WATER QUALITY IMPACT Introduction 3.1 Lung Kwu Chau Is Agreement No. CE 55/2000 EIA Study For Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty Civil Engineering Department Final EIA Report 3 WATER QUALITY IMPACT Introduction 3.1 Lung Kwu Chau is located within the Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park. Water quality is one of the key environmental issues. This chapter presents an assessment of the potential impacts on water quality associated with the construction and operation of the proposed jetty at Lung Kwu Chau. The environmental acceptability of these potential water quality impacts is assessed, with a view to identifying appropriate mitigation measures to reduce any identified adverse impacts to acceptable levels. A morphological impact assessment has also been undertaken for the Project to address any potential impacts on the beach located to the immediate north of the proposed jetty. Environmental Legislation and Standards 3.2 The criteria for evaluating water quality impacts in this EIA Study include: · Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance) (EIAO TM); · Water Pollution Control Ordinance (WPCO); · Technical Memorandum on Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters (TM-DSS); · Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG); and · Practice Note for Professional Persons (ProPECC), Construction Site Drainage (PN 1/94). Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), Cap. 499, S.16 3.3 This Project is a Designated Project under Schedule 2 of the EIAO. The EIAO TM was issued by the EPD under Section 16 of the EIAO. It specified the assessment method and criteria that was followed in this Study. Reference sections in the EIAO TM provide the details of assessment criteria and guidelines that are relevant to the water quality assessment, including: · Annex 6 – Criteria for Evaluating Water Pollution; and · Annex 14 – Guidelines for Assessment of Water Pollution. Water Quality Objectives 3.4 The Water Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap. 358) provides the major statutory framework for the protection and control of water quality in Hong Kong. According to the Ordinance and its subsidiary legislation, Hong Kong waters are divided into ten Water Control Zones (WCZs). Corresponding statements of Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) are stipulated for different water regimes (marine waters, inland waters, bathing beaches subzones, secondary conta ct recreation subzones and fish culture subzones) in the WCZs based on their F:\PROJECTS\A15500\reports\Final EIA\Sect_3.doc 3-1 MAUNSELL Agreement No. CE 55/2000 EIA Study For Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty Final EIA Report Civil Engineering Department beneficial uses. The proposed jetty is located within the North Western Water Control Zone and the corresponding WQOs are listed in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Summary of Water Quality Objectives for the North Western WCZ Parameter Objective Part(s) of Zone Aesthetic Discharge shall not cause objectionable Whole Zone Appearance odour or discolouration No tarry residue, floating wood, articles Whole Zone made of grass, plastic, rubber or any other substance Mineral oil not visible on the surface. Whole Zone Surfactants shall not give rise to a lasting foam No recognizable sewage-derived debris Whole Zone No floating, submerged or semi- Whole Zone submerged subjects likely to interfere with the free movement or damage of material Not to contain substances which settle to Whole Zone form objectionable deposits E. coli Annual geometric mean not to exceed Secondary contact recreation 610/100 mL subzones Geometric mean not to exceed 180/100 Bathing beach subzones mL during March to October inclusive in 1 year; sample should be taken at least 3 times in 1 calendar month at intervals of between 3 to 14 days Geometric mean of the most recent 5 Tuen Mun (A) and Tuen Mun (B) consecutive samples taken at intervals of Subzones and Water gathering between 7 and 21 days not to be less than ground subzones 1/100 mL Geometric mean of the most recent 5 Tuen Mun (C) Subzone and other consecutive samples taken at intervals of inland waters between 7 and 21 days not to exceed 1000/100 mL Colour Not to exceed 30 Hazen units Tuen Mun (A) and Tuen Mun (B) Subzones and Water gathering ground subzones Not to exceed 50 Hazen units Tuen Mun (C) Subzone and other inland waters Dissolved Not less than 2 mg/L for 90% samples Marine waters Oxygen within 2 m of seabed MAUNSELL 3-2 F:\PROJECTS\A15500\reports\Final EIA\Sect_3.doc Agreement No. CE 55/2000 EIA Study For Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty Civil Engineering Department Final EIA Report Parameter Objective Part(s) of Zone Depth averaged Not less than 4 mg/L for 90% samples Marine waters Dissolved Oxygen Not less than 4 mg/L Tuen Mun (A), Tuen Mun (B) and Tuen Mun (c) Subzones, Water gathering ground subzones and other inland waters pH value Within the range 6.5 to 8.5 units; change Marine waters excepting Bathing due to human activity not to exceed 0.2 Beach Subzones unit Within the range 6.5 – 8.5 units Tuen Mun (A), Tuen Mun (B) and Tuen Mun (c) Subzones, Water gathering ground subzones Within the range 6.0 - 9.0 units Other inland waters Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 units for 95% Bathing Beach Subzones of samples collected during the year; change due to waste discharge not to exceed 0.5 unit Temperature Change due to waste discharge not to Whole zone exceed 2oC Salinity Change due to waste discharge not to Whole zone exceed 10% of natural ambient level Suspended Waste discharge not to raise the natural Marine waters solids ambient level by more than 30%, nor cause the accumulation of suspended solids which may adversely affect aquatic communities Tuen Mun (A), Tuen Mun (B) and Annual median not to exceed 20 mg/L Tuen Mun (C) Subzones, Water gathering ground subzones Annual median not to exceed 25 mg/L Other Inland waters Un -ionized Annual mean not to exceed 0.021 mg/L Whole zone ammonia Nutrients Not to be present in quantities that cause Marine waters excessive growth of algae or other aquatic plants Annual mean depth-average inorganic Castle Peak Bay Subzone nitrogen not to exceed 0.3 mg/L Annual mean depth-average inorganic Marine waters excepting Castle nitrogen not to exceed 0.5 mg/L Peak Bay Subzone 5-Day Not to exceed 3 mg/L Tuen Mun (A), Tuen Mun (B) and Biochemical Tuen Mun (C) Subzones, Water Oxygen gathering ground subzones Demand Not to exceed 5 mg/L Other Inland waters F:\PROJECTS\A15500\reports\Final EIA\Sect_3.doc 3-3 MAUNSELL Agreement No. CE 55/2000 EIA Study For Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty Final EIA Report Civil Engineering Department Parameter Objective Part(s) of Zone Chemical Not to exceed 15 mg/L Tuen Mun (A), Tuen Mun (B) and Oxygen Tuen Mun (C) Subzones, Water Demand gathering ground subzones Not to exceed 30 mg/L Other Inland waters Toxic Not to be present at levels producing Whole zone Substances significant toxic effect, carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic effects in humans, fish or any other aquatic organisms, with due regard to biologically cumulative effects in food chains and to interactions of toxic substances with each other Not to cause a risk to any beneficial use of Whole zone the aquatic environment Phenol Not to be present in such quantities as to Bathing beach subzones produce a specific odour, nor to exceed 0.05 mg/L as C6H5OH Turbidity Not reduce light transmission substantially Bathing Beach Subzones from the normal level Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG) 3.5 The Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG), Chapter 9 (Environment), provides additional information on regulatory guidelines against water pollution for sensitive uses such as aquaculture and fisheries zones, bathing waters and other contact recreational waters. Technical Memorandum 3.6 Besides setting the WQOs, the WPCO controls effluent discharging into the WCZ through a licensing system. A Technical Memorandum on Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters (TM-DSS) was issued under Section 21 of the WPCO that gives guidance on the permissible effluent discharges based on the type of receiving waters (foul sewers, storm water drains, inland and coastal waters). The limits control the physical, chemical and microbial quality of effluents. Any effluent discharges from the proposed construction activities should comply with the standards for effluents discharged into the inshore waters or marine waters of the North Western WCZ, as shown in Table 10a and Table 10b, respectively, of the TM-DSS. Practice Note 3.7 A practice note for professional persons was issued by the EPD to provide guidelines for handling and disposal of construction site discharges. The ProPECC PN 1/94 “Construction Site Drainage” provides good practice guidelines for dealing with ten types of discharge from a construction site. These include surface runoff, groundwater, boring and drilling water, bentonite slurry, water for testing and sterilisation of water retaining structures and MAUNSELL 3-4 F:\PROJECTS\A15500\reports\Final EIA\Sect_3.doc Agreement No. CE 55/2000 EIA Study For Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty Civil Engineering Department Final EIA Report water pipes, wastewater from building constructions, acid cleaning, etching and pickling wastewater, and wastewater from site facilities. Practices given in the ProPECC PN 1/94 should be followed as far as possible during construction to minimise the water quality impact due to construction site drainage. Sediment Quality 3.8 Dredged sediments destined for marine disposal are classified according to a set of regulatory guidelines for designation of sediments (Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediment, WBTC No. 3/2000) issued by the Works Bureau and Planning, Environment and Lands Bureau in April 2000.
Recommended publications
  • Report on the 2007 Village Representative Election
    111 Appendix XI(A) (Page 1/20) 2007 Village Representative Election Results for RR Elections Number of Votes District/ Candidate Number received Result of Rural Name of Village and as Election Committee Candidate Name Declared by RO ISLANDS Lamma Island Ko Long ─ LAU CHI YUEN ─ Uncontested (North) Lo Tik Wan ─ NG CHONG YIP ─ Uncontested Pak Kok Kau Tsuen ─ CHAN KWOK KIN ─ Uncontested Pak Kok San Tsuen ─ CHOW CHEUNG YAU ─ Uncontested Sha Po ─ MA CHING WAH ─ Uncontested Tai Peng Tsuen ─ WONG KING CHEE ─ Uncontested Tai Wan Kau Tsuen ─ CHAN KAM PANG ─ Uncontested Tai Wan San Tsuen ─ CHAN WAI LUN ALAN ─ Uncontested Tai Yuen ─ CHOW WING CHUNG ALAN ─ Uncontested Wang Long ─ CHOW KWOK KWONG ─ Uncontested Yung Shue Long ─ WONG KING CHUEN ─ Uncontested Yung Shue Wan 1 YU LAI FAN 153 Elected 2 FONG MAN SANG 26 3 NG TAM HING 82 Lamma Island Lo So Shing (South) Luk Chau Mo Tat ─ CHAN KAM WAH ─ Uncontested Mo Tat Wan Po Toi Sok Kwu Wan 1 WONG MING TAT 21 2 LAI MUN MING 42 Elected Tung O Yung Shue Ha Mui Wo Chung Hau (North) 1 WONG FUK KAN 151 Elected 2 YUEN YUK KAU 140 Chung Hau (South) 1 CHUI PUI MAN WENDY 252 Elected 2 HO KAM HO 100 Luk Tei Tong 1 LI KWOK KEUNG 99 Elected 2 KAM CHI SHING 84 Man Kok Tsui Ngau Kwu Long Pak Mong ─ KWOK SHU YUNG ─ Uncontested Pak Ngan Heung ─ WONG WAI KIT ─ Uncontested Tai Ho ─ HO TIN SHUNG ─ Uncontested Tai Tei Tong ─ WONG CHAU FUK ─ Uncontested Wo Tin 1 TANG KA HUNG 12 Elected 2 HO HUNG CHAN 10 Peng Chau Nim Shu Wan ─ WONG SIU NGOK ─ Uncontested 112 Appendix XI(A) (Page 2/20) Number of Votes District/ Candidate Number
    [Show full text]
  • Legco Letter 22 April
    CB(1)1429/08-09(01) Hon Cheung Hok-ming, SBS, JP Chairman Panel on Transport Legislative Council Legislative Council Building 8 Jackson Road, Central Hong Kong Dear Mr. Cheung, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge (‘HZMB’) and public opposition to the Hong Kong Link Road (‘HKLR’) route The purpose of this letter is to urgently bring to the attention of the Panel on Transport the extent of public opposition to the proposed route of the HKLR of the HZMB after the bridge ‘lands’ in Hong Kong territory. Tung Chung Sustainable Development and other local organisations working to promote sustainable development have voiced concerns to the Highways Department regarding the impact of the proposed HKLR route and made counter proposals for a viable alternative. We request the Legislative Council Panel on Transport to urgently review the counter proposal and take account of the public opposition to the road route proposed by the Highways Department. Details of the negative impact of the HD / Arup proposed route for the HKLR for the HZMB are in the attached documents. Most importantly, the proposed route will have a huge negative impact on the health of local residents because of the proximity of vehicle emissions from a major highway. As management professionals we favour sustainable development and do not appose the construction of the HZMB, but we do object to the proposed route. We urge you to table the details of the no pollution solution to the Panel on Transport during your meeting on Friday 24th April. Yours sincerely, (Martin Purbrick) for Tung Chung Sustainable Development Alliance c.c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Programme for the Chinese White Dolphin in Hong Kong
    The Conservation Programme for the Chinese White Dolphin in Hong Kong Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................2 II. SPECIES OVERVIEW ...................................................................................4 1. DISTRIBUTION .....................................................................................................4 2. ABUNDANCE .......................................................................................................4 3. HOME RANGE AND GROUP SIZE..........................................................................4 4. BEHAVIOUR ........................................................................................................5 5. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................5 6. FEEDING AND REPRODUCTION ............................................................................5 7. THREATS.............................................................................................................5 III. HUMAN IMPACTS.........................................................................................7 1. HABITAT LOSS AND DISTURBANCE .....................................................................7 2. POLLUTION .........................................................................................................7 3. DEPLETION OF FOOD RESOURCES .......................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Paper No. 03/2014 8 March 2014
    (Translated Version) For discussion on LanDAC Paper No. 03/2014 8 March 2014 First Meeting of Lantau Development Advisory Committee Agenda Item 4: Development Potentials and Constraints of Lantau 1. Purpose This paper aims at introducing the development potentials and constraints of Lantau. 2. Present Situation 2.1 Lantau is the largest island in Hong Kong covering a land area of about 147 km2 (excluding its nearby islands and the airport), of which about 102 km2 (about 70%) is country parks. Lantau comprises mainly undeveloped, natural coastal areas and inland mountainous terrains. At present, Lantau has a population of about 105 000 (based on the 2011 Census), mainly in Tung Chung New Town, Discovery Bay, Mui Wo, the rural township of Tai O and the rural settlements in South Lantau. 2.2 There are a number of strategic economic and urban infrastructure developments in northern Lantau including the Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA), AsiaWorld-Expo and Tung Chung New Town as well as the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) and the Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLKL) under construction. 2.3 Eastern Lantau is a tourist, leisure and recreation hub with facilities including the Hong Kong Disneyland Theme Park, the Inspiration Lake and hotels. On the other hand, the southern and western Lantau mainly consist of rural areas and rural townships such as Mui Wo, Tai O, traditional villages etc. as well as diversified tourist attractions including Ngong Ping (Translated Version) 2 360, Po Lin Monastery, Big Buddha, Wisdom Path, country parks, country trails, beaches at the coast of southern Lantau etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawing No. MCL/P132/EIA/13-012
    Tsing Shan Siu On Sha Po Kong LUNG KWU TAN Tsuen Court 583 CASTLE PEAK Tuk Mei Chi Lok Chung San Shek Wan Fa Yuen San Tsuen Lung Tsai 517 Lung Mun 268 Oasis Sw P Tsui Ning Garden Siu Lun Court Glorious Garden Golf Course Henford Garden SAM SHING HUI Sam Shing Estate San Shek Wan San Tsuen Phase ll Wu Shan Tap Shek Kok Recreation Playground Shek Kok CASTLE PEAK BEACH Tsui Tuen Mun So Kwun Wat Ser Res Siu Shan Court Typhoon Shelter Tsuen s“ LUNG KWU CHAU Coal Depot 249 Butterfly Estate Power Station Wu King Estate Yuet Wu Melody Siu Hei Villa Garden Butterfly Beach Park Court Coal Depot 5 68 Cement Works So Kwun »­ Tan Ferry Pier ¶“ SIU LANG SHUI Ser Res Hong Kong Gold Coast Tai Lam Chung Tsuen PILLAR POINT Sewage Treatment (MONG HAU SHEK) Works Siu Lam San Tsuen HKSAR BOUNDARY F¤w‹˛⁄s“„ SHA CHAU AND LUNG KWU CHAU MARINE PARK ¥ PAK CHAU 55 LEGEND: PROPOSED LAND FORMATION FOOTPRINT OBSERVATION RANGE (1km) OBSERVATION RANGE (2km) F¨ SHA CHAU OBSERVATION RANGE (3km) 17 A D LAND BASED SURVEY LOCATION p¤i SIU MO TO 6 øªÁ Cheung Sok Tsui 30 øª 6 CHEUNG SOK U¤¤ Ha Kok Tsui j¤p¤ LUK KENG BAY j¤i THE BROTHERS TAI MO TO ‡ 6 Luk Keng YAM TSAI WAN YAN O WAN ±³ Yam Tsai ˝… 67 TSZ KAN CHAU ·¥ Ta Pang Po YªD YAN O TUK Fª­ t A ¨¤w‹Œ Tung Yip Hang Ser Res AsiaWorld-Expo ‘† j¤ Sham Shui Kok TAI SHAN |¥ B SZE PAK AU È«B¹ SKYCITY Ferry Terminal 263 p† LAI PIK SHAN »›·Œ “‚” T⁄ Golf Course SAM PAK AU Hong Kong International Airport j¤| È«B¹ TAI CHE TUNG Passenger Terminal o´ 302 Water Treatment Works ˆƒ⁄B Sewage Treatment SZE PAK WAN –– Works T¤ Control Tower
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Comprehensive Residential and Commercial Development Atop Siu Ho Wan Depot VISUAL SENSITIVE RECEIVERS PLAN
    y r a ound N B IO T D T R C A E e A S O C S R K E ng R - I a · U R EET N T P Tuen Mun North ° U 00 A 579 K « N M 3 IN O HO Fresh Water Ser Res I I Ø T N G on T SEC K- O 100 « ª µ K C i ng » KIN WONG L e «Ø© T C F ³ A N - i S A T A ª R I R W N ¥ E g e r T T F ¬ T 00 ¥ US ± T 5 T e i µ U T AT S © UNG µ S I S T e ú Á L s S KIN WONG « à E S 400 F Ø© T E E T ¥ R S C t N O R R ST Û R T T ª ¸ I F T ONG IL EET C RA I O S M K Ò T A P RE A L ON A TU n ¹ NA L I I F M V S A ¦ A ON I L I 2 O m TA R L T A a I ± R 00 KIN FAT L H T T A «Øµ L A ¤ « M ¶ E Æ M a E V S h N T R ¶ P A I L HO L I ¬ E i Ø F S K § L j C I e ³ ¤¸¥ C O Æ I l N À P Ë ¹ A C N ù ­ Y A M R « I E ¤ E A A A A ¤ Ð v «Øº K 54 R j TS K T ª M N ± T i · T § ® AR L « UNG Ä ng ¢ M T I V 251 F Æ ¤ C OUSE i i O R j µ K OK C t º ¤ ¤ T ¨ Ù A Å LO ION D N Æ - n « I s ¸ KI Ø j FIRE OSEH N K T N Ô ¨ WI º U ¤ 40 R e ´ T ® a N G I ¤ · A T Ø LE I S - K ¤jÆV­¥ 0 T L O M C © r M N A « ¥ ° S M « ¤ G Ø ¯ N D KIN KWAN AN t S º  ¤ ¬ OA T YE I N G R ¯¬ µ U K E NG C K s YAN U I N CH 200 IN R H i ¦ G T ¨ S U T U 3 432 I 00 Ø M N n ® z O I i « N TAI LAM COUNTRY PARK T Ø ² C ª E 300 m M ³ ´ ³ E « U Á ¼w Á S T d PUI e ¬ ± ³ 3 ¹ TO ¯ HAN S R S A OAD ª µ E m AN N · ® AI L Ù F ½ Y ¯ D I ROA - l C O ¤ s K ¨ T I T K 200 a U P N S ¤ L ·s C i ¥ YA A R · 0 c C · 0 s N 300 T S ¤ L 4 D s ¦ ¸ I · A ª E ACLEHO e « ´ M S RA T N T R E U Ù R T ¤ S ¨ O p T ¤ÙªùªF•¹ ¤ E P U G ¶ F I Ù « « ¤ ¤ Tuen Mun East S L NG N E ST ¤ P G M T Ù Fresh Water Ser Res UN U N L N UE U ¶ A ¶ HO T E S Ù C E ³ ê N L A N I N A ¼ S S RC H I S µ A HUN
    [Show full text]
  • 1. INTRODUCTION Background to the Study 1.1 a Doppler VHF Omni
    1. INTRODUCTION Background To The Study 1.1 A Doppler VHF Omni-directional Range and Distance Measuring Equipment (DVOR/DME) Station is being operated on Lung Kwu Chau to provide bearing and distance information to the approaching/departing aircrafts to and from the Chek Lap Kok Airport. The existing jetty at Lung Kwu Chau, which is ruined and abandoned for use, is too small and of too shallow water depth to accommodate the Civil Aviation Department’s (CAD) vessels for transporting equipment and personnel for servicing and maintaining the DVOR/DME. Currently, the transportation has to rely on helicopters, which is however prohibited during night times and adverse weather conditions. In order that emergency repair work can be undertaken during such periods, CAD has proposed to construct a proper jetty for berthing of marine vessels. The construction work will be implemented under the project, namely “Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty” (hereinafter referred to as “ the Project”). 1.2 Maunsell Consultants Asia Ltd have been commissioned by the Civil Engineering Department (CED) of the Hong Kong SAR Government to undertake the EIA Study of the Project. In accordance with the EIA Study Brief, an initial assessment of the environmental impacts arising from the Project was firstly undertaken to identify those environmental issues of key concern during the construction and operation phases of the Project that require further more detailed assessment. The findings of the initial assessment were presented in the Final Initial Assessment Report (IAR) submitted on 16 May 2001. A detailed assessment of all the key issues identified in the IAR has followed after the consultation exercise with the Lung Kwu Tan villagers, relevant government departments and the Marine Parks Committee, and confirmation of the preferred jetty location.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Location and Scale of Project 2.1 the Proposed Site of the Project Is Located on the Eastern Coast Of
    Agreement No. CE 55/2000 EIA Study For Construction of Lung Kwu Chau Jetty Civil Engineering Department Final EIA Report 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Location and Scale of Project 2.1 The proposed site of the Project is located on the eastern coast of Lung Kwu Chau as shown in Figure 2.1. Lung Kwu Chau is situated within the gazetted Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park. Due to the remoteness of the site, the island is uninhabited with no infrastructure other than the existing jetty and the Doppler VHF Omni-directional Range and Distance Measuring Equipment (DVOR/DME) Station. The location of the existing jetty is also shown on Figure 2.1. 2.2 The scope of this project comprises the construction of a precast concrete blockwork jetty and a concrete catwalk, dredging of an approach channel, installation of miscellaneous facilities and demolition of the existing jetty. 2.3 A jetty was constructed at nearby Sha Chau to serve the radar station set up by CAD on the island for the new airport at Chek Lap Kok. To date it appears that no environmental concerns have been raised in connection with the operation of this radar station and the assoc iated jetty, which is also located within the Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park. The structural form of the Sha Chau jetty is similar to that proposed under the preliminary design of the jetty at Lung Kwu Chau, although the jetty at Sha Chau is larger in size. A jetty has also been provided at Siu Mo To to serve the DVOR/DME station located there.
    [Show full text]
  • RECLAMATION OUTSIDE VICTORIA HARBOUR and ROCK CAVERN DEVELOPMENT
    Enhancing Land Supply Strategy RECLAMATION OUTSIDE VICTORIA HARBOUR and ROCK CAVERN DEVELOPMENT Strategic Environmental Assessment Report - Reclamation Sites Executive Summary Civil Engineering Development Department Agreement No. 9/2011 Increasing Land Supply by Reclamation and Rock Cavern Development cum Public Engagement - Feasibility Study SEA Report - Reclamation Sites (Executive Summary) Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Project Background 3 1.2 Objectives of Assignment 3 1.3 SEA and Objectives of SEA 4 1.4 Disclaimer 4 2 Overall Site Selection Methodology 5 3 Review of Previous Studies and Constraints 6 3.1 Constraints and Considerations 6 3.2 SEA/Environmental Considerations in the Identification of Pre-longlisted Reclamation Sites 8 4 Stage 1 Public Engagement and Formulation of Site Selection Criteria (SSC) 11 4.1 Stage 1 Public Engagement 11 4.2 Site Selection Criteria 11 4.3 SEA/Environmental Comments 12 4.4 Other Comments 12 4.5 SEA/Environmental Observations 13 5 Selection of Longlisted Sites 14 5.1 Site Longlisting Methodology 14 5.2 Initial Site Selection Criteria 14 5.3 SEA/Environmental Findings in the Longlisting Process for Reclamation 16 6 Broad Environmental Assessments 19 6.1 Broad Environmental Assessments 19 6.2 Key Environmental Issues of Longlisted Sites 19 6.3 Overall Strategic Environmental Findings of the Longlisted Reclamation Sites 27 7 Site Shortlisting and Key Environmental Issues and Opportunities of the Shortlisted Sites and Artificial Islands 30 7.1 Site Shortlisting Methodology 30 7.2 Site Shortlisting with SEA/Environmental Considerations 30 7.3 Shortlisted Sites, Artificial Islands and Key Environmental Issues and Opportunities 31 REP/98/01 | Rev 11 | SEA REPORT - RECLAMATION (EXECUTIVE SUMMARY) V11 WITH CEDD MARKED UP.DOCX Civil Engineering Development Department Agreement No.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 Environment Bureau Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Environmental Protection Department Food and En
    CHAPTER 2 Environment Bureau Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Environmental Protection Department Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Leisure and Cultural Services Department Government’s efforts in tackling shoreline refuse Audit Commission Hong Kong 28 October 2020 This audit review was carried out under a set of guidelines tabled in the Provisional Legislative Council by the Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee on 11 February 1998. The guidelines were agreed between the Public Accounts Committee and the Director of Audit and accepted by the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Report No. 75 of the Director of Audit contains 10 Chapters which are available on our website at https://www.aud.gov.hk Audit Commission 26th floor, Immigration Tower 7 Gloucester Road Wan Chai Hong Kong Tel : (852) 2829 4210 Fax : (852) 2824 2087 E-mail : [email protected] GOVERNMENT’S EFFORTS IN TACKLING SHORELINE REFUSE Contents Paragraph EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 – 1.12 Audit review 1.13 General response from the Government 1.14 Acknowledgement 1.15 PART 2: MONITORING OF SHORELINE CLEANLINESS 2.1 – 2.3 BY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT Inspection of coastal sites 2.4 – 2.18 Audit recommendations 2.19 Response from the Government 2.20 Protocol for handling surge of marine refuse 2.21 – 2.25 Audit recommendation 2.26 Response from the Government 2.27 PART 3: CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS BY AGRICULTURE, 3.1 FISHERIES AND CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT Monitoring of clean-up operations 3.2 – 3.7 — i —
    [Show full text]
  • Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport Into a Three-Runway System
    Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System Project Profile May 2012 Airport Authority Hong Kong Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a 249855 ENL ENL 10 A Three-RunwayP:\Hong Kong\INF\Projects2\ System249855 HKIA Contract P132 \Deliverables \D1.10 Project Profile \Rev2 \Project Profile RevA.doc 23 December 2011 Project Profile May 2012 Airport Authority Hong Kong Mott MacDonald, 20/F Two Landmark East, 100 How Ming Street, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong T +852 2828 5757 F +852 2827 1823, W www.mottmac.com Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System Project Profile Content Chapter Title Page 1. Basic Information 1 1.1 Project Title________________________________________________________________________ 1 1.2 Purpose and Nature of the Project ______________________________________________________ 1 1.3 Name of Project Proponent ___________________________________________________________ 7 1.4 Location and Scale of the Project _______________________________________________________ 7 1.5 Number and Types of Designated Projects _______________________________________________ 8 1.6 Name and Telephone Number of Contact Person(s) ________________________________________ 9 2. Outline of Planning and Implementation Programme 10 2.1 Project Planning and Implementation ___________________________________________________ 10 2.2 Project Programme_________________________________________________________________ 10 2.3 Interactions with Broader Programme Requirements or Other Projects
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Minor Triangulation Network
    深 圳 424 河 沙 頭 吉澳 角 河 香園 圍 Sha Tau R CROOKED ISLAND Heung Yuen Kok i 長排頭 Wai ve 東澳 48 蓮麻 坑 沙頭角 r Ledge Point 鴨洲 雞公 嶺 雞公頭 Lin Ma Hang Tung O 439 SHA TAU 山咀 AP CHAU KAI KUNG LENG Kai Kung Tau 斬頸洲 37 平洲 KOK 長石咀 122 Shan Tsui y 三角咀 431 r Cham Keng a CHEUNG d Sam Kok Chau PING CHAU n 521 SHEK TSUI 簡頭 圍 u 榕 樹 凹 Tsui 60 o B 61 紅花嶺 吉澳 海 Kan Tau Wai a Yung Shue Au 更樓石 e 白沙洲 ROBIN'S NEST 492 r 538 A 洋洲 週田 村 打鼓嶺 CROOKED HARBOUR 64 ROUND ISLAND 536 Kang Lau 400 d 文錦渡 422 Chow Tin 沙頭角海 e YEUNG Shek TA KWU LING 300 s o Tsuen l CHAU C 墳洲 MAN KAM TO 坪洋 STARLING INLET r e er 426 Ping Yeung 200 麻雀 嶺 ti FUN CHAU iv 平 on Fr TSING CHAU LEK R 100 Ma Tseuk Leng 原 青洲瀝 n R 50 iv 谷埔 娥眉洲 e e 河 235 h r z 羅湖 en G h 沙嶺 a KUK PO CRESCENT ISLAND S 梧 n LO WU g 萬屋 邊 鳳坑 Sha Ling e 荔枝 窩 桐 s 深 圳 河 50 坪輋 Man Uk Fung Hang 河 423 Pin 10097 Lai Chi Wo 馬草壟 183 下山 雞乙 Ping Che 印洲塘 517 523 鹿頸 MA TSO Ha Shan 萊洞 255 DOUBLE HAVEN 大 鵬 灣 大石磨 Kai Wat dus 南涌 539 427 上水 華山 In LUK KENG 三椏 村 LUNG er Loi Tung CREST HILL 72 iv 50 Sheung Shui R NAM CHUNG 梅子 林 Sam A Tsuen 虎王洲 Indus 簡頭 村 520 er Wa Shan 50 往灣洲 MIRS BAY iv 50 Mui Tsz FU WONG R 丹 Kan Tau Tsuen Lam 200 后 海 灣 落馬洲 河上 鄉 山 河 CHAU DOUBLE ISLAND 黃竹角咀 421 100 ( Dapeng Wan ) LOK MA Ho Sheung 上 水 534 300 416 Wong Chuk ( 深 圳 灣 ) CHAU Heung Kok Tsui 50 s a 軍地 e 塱原 小坑 村 烏蛟騰 SHEUNG SHUI R 下七 木橋 黃竹 角海 B 200 428 iv 519 537 Kwan Tei r 石湖墟 梧桐河 Siu Hang e 486 Ha Tsat Muk Kiu e LONG r 542 WU KAU TANG 三椏 涌 v i Tsuen J DEEP BAY VALLEY h R SHEK WU 龜頭嶺 Sam A Chung WONG CHUK KOK HOI e l 62 新田 HUI u 聯和墟 m KWAI TAU LENG ( Shenzhen Bay ) 古洞 419 50 131 SAN TIN
    [Show full text]