DOCSLIB.ORG

IEG ICR Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IEG ICR Review Report Number ::: ICRRICRR1389813898 ICR Review IEG Independent Evaluation Group Public Disclosure Authorized 1. Project Data: Date Posted ::: 05/01/2014 Country::: Uruguay Project ID ::: P057481 Appraisal Actual Project Name ::: Transport Project Costs (((US$M(US$MUS$M):):):): 100 104.4 Infrastructure Maintenance And Rural Access LLL/L///CC Number::: L7303 LoanLoan////CreditCredit (((US$M(US$MUS$M):):):): 70 68.1 Sector Board ::: Transport Cofinancing (((US$M(US$MUS$M):):):): 0 0 Cofinanciers ::: GTZ Board Approval Date ::: 06/09/2005 Public Disclosure Authorized Closing Date ::: 07/31/2011 07/31/2011 SectorSector((((ssss):):):): Roads and highways (92%); Central government administration (3%); Ports waterways and shipping (3%); Sub-national government administration (2%) ThemeTheme((((ssss):):):): Trade facilitation and market access (33% - P); Rural services and infrastructure (17% - S); Regional integration (17% - S); Infrastructure services for private sector development (17% - S); Injuries and non-communicable diseases (16% - S) Prepared by ::: Reviewed by ::: ICR Review GroupGroup:::: Coordinator ::: Kavita Mathur Roy Gilbert Christopher David IEGPS1 Nelson 2. Project Objectives and Components: Public Disclosure Authorized a. Objectives: The project's development objective was to upgrade the country's transport infrastructure to a condition that facilitates the transportation of freight and passengers at a cost-efficient level of service (Loan Agreement Schedule 2, p 26 and PAD, p. 11). b.Were the project objectives/key associated outcome targets revised during implementation? No c. Components: The cost table by components in Annex 1 of the ICR is incomplete. Its figures refer to the Bank Loan amount per components. Actual full cost by component is not presented in the ICR. The project team provided IEG with the cost data. Component 1: Transport Infrastructure Rehabilitation (appraisal estimate US$ 44.6 million; actual cost US$61.0 million). This component entailed carrying out reinforcement, replacement, and Public Disclosure Authorized rehabilitation works of strategic transport infrastructure, including international Mercosur corridors, linking economic poles with export markets or providing transfer terminals for key economic activities. This component was subdivided into three sub-components: Road department Direccion Nacional de Vialidad (DNV) managed routes consisting of: (a) reinforcing the pavement structure of about 35 km of roads on national Route 3 and Route 8; and (b) 20 km between Rio Tacuari-Cafiada Santos on national Route 18. Corporacion Vial del Uruguay (CVU) managed routes and bridges consisting of: reinforcing the pavement structure of 24 km on National Routes 1, 2 and 3 and carrying out reconditioning works consisting of strengthening, widening or replacing existing structures of 20 bridges located on routes 1,5, 6, 7, 8, 21, 26, 28, 30 and 200 (Interbalnearia route) and the access to Montevideo. Transfer terminal rehabilitation, involving minor infrastructure rehabilitation works on eligible terminals, playing an important role in industrial and traditional fishing, tourism and freight and passenger transfers. Component 2: Road rehabilitation and maintenance (CREMA) contracts (appraisal estimate US$ 24.85 million; actual cost US$18.0 million). This component entailed carrying out the rehabilitation and maintenance of six road sub-networks covering an estimated 981 km of national roads through performance based CREMA contracts. Component 3: Departmental road rehabilitation and maintenance (appraisal estimate US$ 20.6 million; actual cost US$23.0 million). This component entailed carrying out the rehabilitation and maintenance of eligible annual departmental sub-projects executed by participating Departmental Governments and partially funded by the DNV through an annual performance based agreement. The departmental road maintenance program considered under the project included the yearly routine maintenance of approximately 9,000 km of gravel roads, during at least two years. Component 4: Transport Infrastructure and safety program (appraisal estimate US$ 3.8 million; actual cost US$1.9 million). This component included low-cost measures and investments to increase road safety, including roads passing through urban areas and the acquisition of road safety elements. Component 5: Transport sector management and institutional building (appraisal estimate US$ 5.8 million; actual cost US$0.15 million). This component included technical assistance support to enhance transport infrastructure management, involving: (i) assisting Ministry of Transport and Public Works (MTOP) in the preparation of its transport infrastructure plan for 2005-2009; (ii) training for capacity building and provision of new tools; (iii) strengthening infrastructure management at departmental level; (iv) assisting MTOP in the preparation of an urban transport program for Montevideo; and (v) feasibility studies of the Montevideo ring road and access roads project. d. Comments on Project Cost, Financing, Borrower Contribution, and Dates: Project Cost. As previously noted the cost table by components in Annex 1 of the ICR is incomplete, the figures refer to the Bank Loan amount. Therefore, the actual project cost at completion is unavailable. The project team provided IEG with the cost data which was US$104.4 million. The overall cost overrun is about US$4.4 million was covered by Uruguay’s own resources. Financing. The actual loan disbursed was US$68.1 million compared to the appraisal estimate of US$70 million. Borrower Contribution: The Borrower's actual contribution was US$30 million. Dates . The project closed on time. 3. Relevance of Objectives & Design: a. Relevance of Objectives: Rated high . The project objectives are in line with the recently approved Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) for the period 2010 - 2015. The second pillar of the CPS called "Competitiveness and Infrastructure" focuses on the improvement of the condition of key land transport infrastructure as well as improvement in the institutional capacity in the MTOP to carry out transport planning. The project objective remains highly relevant to current country priorities as Uruguay is aiming to become a regional logistics hub for South America. By reducing transportation costs, removing infrastructure bottlenecks to improve regional integration and trade, modernizing MTOP and promoting participation of the private sector in road maintenance, the project objectives were directly aligned to Bank and country priorities. b. Relevance of Design: Rated substantial . The results framework linked inputs to expected outputs and outcomes in a logical causal chain. The project's components focusing on the transport infrastructure rehabilitation are fundamental in restoring the service levels of strategic transport infrastructure, whose condition constrain the efficient provision of transport services, in particular, the transit of heavier and larger trucks. The project components including reinforcement, replacement, and rehabilitation of strategic transport infrastructure, including international Mercosur corridors; rehabilitation and widening of bridges; improving the access to Montevideo are critical for linking economic poles with export markets. These improvements would result in cost-efficient level of service through vehicle operating cost savings and reduction in travel time. 4. Achievement of Objectives (Efficacy): To upgrade the country's transport infrastructure to a condition that facilitates the transportation of freight and passengers at a cost -efficient level of servic e: rated substantial . Outputs About 130 km of national highways were rehabilitated; About 430 km of paved national roads were maintained; On the Road rehabilitation and maintenance (CREMA) contracts, only half of the six contracts foreseen by the PAD were actually undertaken under the project. Many of the other envisaged works were carried out through other sources of financing; All 19 departments fully implemented the roads maintenance program. Approximately 9,000 km of departmental roads were maintained yearly. Around 6% to 13% of these roads are still in poor condition (compared to the 10% target); The number of kilometers of national roads compliant with Mercosur standards has remained constant since the 2005 baseline at 1287 km compared to the target of increasing it to 1400 km.; 5 bridges on Mercosur corridors were upgraded; and Institutional strengthening activities, focusing on transport planning and road management were carried out. The strategic planning tool and the financial management system were updated. Outcome As discussed in Section 10a below, the outcome indicators measured the condition of the entire 8,700 km of the Uruguay’s national road network, although the project supported only fractions of the national road network through the rehabilitation of 130 km and maintenance of 430 km. Therefore, changes in the condition of the entire network will have other non-project causes and the overall results cannot be exclusively attributed to this operation. The ICR nevertheless reports (p. 13) that the percentage of the national road network in bad condition as determined by the Road Condition Index declined from baseline 29.5% in 2005 to 22.3% in 2010 better than the 25% targeted by the project. The opening of National Route 8 to international traffic (trucks loaded to Mercosur standards) required the upgrading of 3 bridges. Two of these bridges (Arroyo Corrales
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 28235 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT (SCL-43950) ON A LOAN Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 64.5 MILLION TO THE ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY FOR A SECOND TRANSPORT PROJECT May 10, 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized Finance, Private Sector and Infrastructure Sector Management Unit (SMU) Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay Country Management Unit (CMU) Latin America and the Caribbean Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective March 16, 2004) Currency Unit = Peso Uruguayo 29.6 = US$ 1 US$ 0.034 = 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ANCAP National Fuel Administration, Alcohol and Portland (Administración Nacional de Combustibles Alcohol y Portland) BMS Bridge Management System CAS ountry Assistance Strategy CEPRE Executive Commission for the Reform of State CND National Corporation for Development (Corporación Nacional de Desarollo) CVU Uruguay Road Corporation (Corporación Vial de Uruguay) CREMA Contracts for Rehabilitation and Maintenance Departments Intendencias DIVD Entity responsible for Departmental Road Maintenance within DNV DNV National Directorate of Highways EEq Energy Equivalent GOU Government of Uruguay HDM Highway Design and Maintenance Standards Model IDB Inter-American Development Bank IERR Internal Economic Rate of Return Departments Intendencias IVA Value Added Tax IRI International Roughness Index ITPI Institute for Transport and Investment Planning LACI Loan Administration
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Road Network of the Study Area
    Feasibility Study for the Improvement of the National Route 2 and Route 7 Final Report CHAPTER 6 ROAD NETWORK OF THE STUDY AREA Feasibility Study for the Improvement of the National Route 2 and Route 7 Final Report 6 ROAD NETWORK OF THE STUDY AREA 6.1 Transportation System (1) Main Ports Inland water transport uses the Parana River and its tributary, the Paraguay River, connecting to the La Plata River on the downstream side. These rivers are the boundaries with Brazil and Argentina and most of the waterways are under joint management. This inland water transport is mainly used for international trade cargo. Principal export/import ports are described below: – Concepción Port: Located 1,940 km from Buenos Aires and in the independent management section of the Paraguay River running through Paraguay. This port is mainly used to load beans on vessels. – Asuncion Port: Located 1,630 km from Buenos Aires, this port is used for cotton export and principal everyday commodities, such as general cargoes and automobiles, are imported in containers via the Paraguay River. – Villeta Port: Located 37km to the south of Asuncion Port and used for export of beans and cotton. – Villa Hayes Port: Located near Asuncion and used for the import of steel making raw materials. – Villa Elisa Port: Located near Asuncion and used for the import of oils. – San Antonio Port: Located near Asuncion and used for the export of beans. – Vallemi Port: Port to import cement raw materials. – Encarnación: Located on the Parana River, 1,583km from Buenos Aires, and used for the export of beans.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeografía Histórica Y Diversidad De Arañas Mygalomorphae De Argentina, Uruguay Y Brasil: Énfasis En El Arco Peripampásico
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MUSEO Biogeografía histórica y diversidad de arañas Mygalomorphae de Argentina, Uruguay y Brasil: énfasis en el arco peripampásico Trabajo de tesis doctoral TOMO II Lic. Nelson E. Ferretti Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores CEPAVE (CCT- CONICET- La Plata) (UNLP) Directora: Dra. Alda González Codirector: Dr. Fernando Pérez-Miles Argentina Año 2012 ÍNDICE DE CONTENIDOS TOMO II Referencias bibliográficas. 244 ANEXOS. 299 Anexo I. Distribución de las especies analizadas. 300 Anexo II. Mapas con la distribución geográfica de las especies de Mygalomorphae utilizadas en los análisis y sus respectivos trazos individuales. 324 Anexo III. Tablas. 359 Publicaciones generadas a partir de la presente tesis. 393 Referencias bibliográficas Aagesen, L., Szumik, C.A., Zuloaga, F.O. & Morrone, O. 2009. Quantitative biogeography in the South America highlands–recognizing the Altoandina, Puna and Prepuna through the study of Poaceae. Cladistics, 25: 295–310. Abrahamovich, A.H., Díaz, N.B. & Morrone, J.J. 2004. Distributional patterns of the Neotropical and Andean species of the genus Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie), 20(1): 99–117. Acosta, L. E. 1989. La fauna de escorpiones y opiliones (Arachnida) de la provincia de Córdoba. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Acosta, L. E. 1993. Escorpiones y opiliones de la provincia de Córdoba (Argentina): Diversidad y zoogeografía. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles, 116(1): 11–17. Acosta, L.E. 2002. Patrones zoogeográficos de los opiliones argentinos (Arachnida: Opiliones). Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 6: 69–84.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeografía Histórica Y Diversidad De Arañas Mygalomorphae De Argentina, Uruguay Y Brasil: Énfasis En El Arco Peripampásico
    i UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MUSEO Biogeografía histórica y diversidad de arañas Mygalomorphae de Argentina, Uruguay y Brasil: énfasis en el arco peripampásico Trabajo de tesis doctoral TOMO I Lic. Nelson E. Ferretti Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores CEPAVE (CCT- CONICET- La Plata) (UNLP) Directora: Dra. Alda González Codirector: Dr. Fernando Pérez-Miles Argentina Año 2012 “La tierra y la vida evolucionan juntas”… León Croizat (Botánico y Biogeógrafo italiano) “Hora tras hora… otra de forma de vida desaparecerá para siempre de la faz del planeta… y la tasa se está acelerando” Dave Mustaine (Músico Estadounidense) A la memoria de mi padre, Edgardo Ferretti ÍNDICE DE CONTENIDOS TOMO I Agradecimientos v Resumen vii Abstract xi Capítulo I: Introducción general. I. Biogeografía. 2 II. Biogeografía histórica. 5 III. Áreas de endemismo. 11 IV. Marco geológico. 14 IV.1- Evolución geológica de América del Sur. 15 IV.2- Arco peripampásico. 23 V. Arañas Mygalomorphae. 30 VI. Objetivos generales. 34 Capítulo II: Diversidad, abundancia, distribución espacial y fenología de la comunidad de Mygalomorphae de Isla Martín García, Ventania y Tandilia. I. INTRODUCCIÓN. 36 I.1- Isla Martín García. 36 I.2- El sistema serrano de Ventania. 37 I.3- El sistema serrano de Tandilia. 38 I.4- Las comunidades de arañas en áreas naturales. 39 I.5- ¿Porqué estudiar las comunidades de arañas migalomorfas? 40 II. OBJETIVOS. 42 II.1- Objetivos específicos. 42 III. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS. 43 III.1- Áreas de estudio. 43 III.1.1- Isla Martín García. 43 III.1.2- Sistema de Ventania.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport Services
    Air Transport Services Agreement signed at Madrid February 20, 1973 ; Entered into force provisionally February 20, 1973 ; Entered into force definitively August 3, 1973 . AIR TRANSPORT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF SPAIN TIAS 7725 (2102) 2104 U .S . Treaties and Other International Agreements [24 UST F . "International air service" shall mean an air service which passes through the air space over the territory of more than one State . G . "Stop for non-traffic purposes" shall mean a landing for any purpose other than taking on or discharging passengers, cargo or mail . ARTICLE 2 Each Contracting Party grants to the other Contracting Party rights for the conduct of air services by the designated airline or airlines, as follows : (1) To fly across the territory of the other Contracting Party without landing ; (2) To land in the territory of the other Contracting Party for non-traffic purposes ; and (3) To make stops at the points in the territory of the other Contracting Party named on each of the routes specified in the appropriate paragraph of the Schedule of this Agreement for the purpose of taking on and discharging international traffic in passengers, cargo, and mail, separately or in combination . ARTICLE 3 Air service on a route specified in the Schedule to this agreement may be inaugurated by an airline or airlines of one Contracting Party at any time after that Contracting Party has designated such airline or airlines for that route and the other Contracting Party has granted the appropriate operating permission . Such other Contracting Party shall, subject to Article 4, grant this permission, provided that the designated airline or airlines may be required to qualify before the competent aeronautical authorities of that Contracting Party, under the laws and regulations applied by those authorities, before being permitted to engage in the operations contemplated in this Agreement .
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) APPRAISAL STAGE Report No.: AB1435 UY Transport Infrastructure Maintenance and Rural Access Project Name Public Disclosure Authorized Region LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Sector Roads and highways (60%);Sub-national government administration (15%);Ports, waterways and shipping (15%);Central government administration (10%) Project ID P057481 Borrower(s) REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY Implementing Agency Ministry of Transport and Civil Works (MTOP) Uruguay Environment Category [ ] A [X] B [ ] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) Date PID Prepared April 19, 2005 Date of Appraisal March 14, 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized Authorization Date of Board Approval June 7, 2005 1. Country and sector issues General Economic Context Between 1999 and 2001 Uruguay endured a prolonged economic recession that ended in a deep crisis in 2002. The slowdown was prompted by several external shocks: Brazilian devaluation (1999), foot and mouth disease outbreak (2001), and weak commodity prices and oil price increases. However, it was the Argentine debt, currency and financial crisis of 2002 that Public Disclosure Authorized triggered the crisis and output collapse in Uruguay. As a result, income inequality and unemployment rose (the latter increased from 11.4 percent in 1999 to 19.7. percent in late 2002), and the fiscal situation deteriorated (fiscal deficit increased from 1 percent of GDP in the 1990s to 4 percent in 2001). 1 Furthermore, a sharp devaluation of the peso in 2002 worsened public debt indicators because a large share of both domestic and foreign debt was held in dollars. The fiscal pressures exerted by the crisis together with a traditionally large participation of the public sector in the provision of infrastructure services, adversely affected their delivery and consequently, the competitiveness of the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 331101 to 331140—Continued 331110
    JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1968 229 331101 to 331140—Continued 331110. Col. No. 31. Fourteen km. northwest of Colonia, 100 m. from Rio de la Plata. Shrub 1.0 m. high; branches many, spreading. 331111. LEPTOCORYPHIUM LANATUM Nees Gramineae. Col. No. 49. Six km. east of Route 3 on Route 26. Plants 1.2 m. high; bunch type. 331112 and 331113. PASPALUM DILATATUM Poir. Gramineae. Dallisgrass. 331112. Col. No. 63. Route 5, south of Peralta. Km. 281. 331113. Col. No. 66. Km. 314 marker on Route 5 near Pampa. Small type. 331114 to 331123. PASPALUM NOTATUM Fluegge. Bahiagrass. 331114. Col. No. 30. Playa Arenisca, 8 km. northwest of Colonia, on beach of Rio de la Plata. 331115. Col. No. 38. Plants growing along Route 2, 6.5 km. east of Mercedes, Soriano Department, at Km. 269.5 marker. 331116. Col. No. 42. Guaviya arroya on Route 3, south of Salto. Robust ecotype with long racemes. 331117. Col. No. 45. Twelve km. south of Sato on Route 3. 331118. Col. No. 46. One km. south of confluence of Arroya San Antonio and Rio Uruguay, in heavily grazed area, near Salto. 331119. Col. No. 52. Arroya Aranjo on Route 26. 331120. Col. No. 61. Football field, Rivera. Small form of bahiagrass. 331121. Col. No. 65. Km. 314 on Route 5. 331122. Col. No. 67. Near Pampa, Km. 314 marker on Route 5. 331123. Col. No. 68. Km. 314 on Route 5. 331124. PASPALUM PAUCICILIATUM (Parodi) Herter Col. No. 53. Route 26, 6 km. east of Route 3. Prostrate type of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB977 Project Name UY Road Maintenance and Rural Access Region LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Sector Roads and highways (75%); Sub-national government administration Public Disclosure Authorized (15%);Central government administration (10%); Project ID P057481 Borrower(s) REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY Implementing Agency Ministry of Transport and Civil Works Environment Category [ ] A [X] B [] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) Safeguard Classification [ ] S1 [ ] S2 [ ] S3 [ ] SF [ ] TBD (to be determined) Date PID Prepared June 14, 2004 Estimated Date of Appraisal October , 2004 Authorization Estimated Date of Board January, 2004 Approval 1. Key development issues and rationale for Bank involvement Public Disclosure Authorized Background Uruguay’s historically high level of economic and social development relative to the region, was further improved in the 1990’s due to a stint of steady economic growth during that period, where the average annual growth rate between 1990 and 1998 reached 3.6%. Many Millennium Development Goals had been attained or seemed attainable, and the Bank even envisioned the possibility of gradual disengagement. However, Uruguay entered into a severe economic recession which was compounded by several external shocks; Argentine crisis (2002), Foot and Mouth disease outbreak (2001), Brazilian devaluation (1999), and weak commodity prices and oil price increases. As a result, income inequality and unemployment rose (the latter rose from 11.4% in 1999 to 15.3% in 2001)1 , and the fiscal situation deteriorated (fiscal deficit increased from 1% of GDP in the 1990s to 4% in 2001). Furthermore, a sharp devaluation of the peso in Public Disclosure Authorized 2002 worsened public debt indicators because a large share of both domestic and foreign debt is held in dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • To Readers of the Attached Code-Share List
    TO READERS OF THE ATTACHED CODE-SHARE LIST: The U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division’s code-share list is an informal compilation of code-share relationships between U.S. and foreign air carriers involving the transportation of passengers. As such, it does not represent a complete compilation of all code shares e.g. cargo and mail only. New code-share relationships are continually being negotiated, and the ones reflected in the attached listing may or may not be still in place or be of a continuing nature. Similarly, the list may not reflect all existing code shares of a particular type, or all existing types of code shares. This list is not an official document of the Department of Transportation and, accordingly, should not be relied upon or cited as such. NOTE: THIS LIST IS COMPRISED OF ONLY THOSE CARRIERS WHOSE CODE-SHARE RELATIONSHIPS ARE OF A NEW OR CONTINUING BASIS. DORMANT CODE-SHARE RELATIONSHIPS TO THE EXTENT KNOWN HAVE BEEN DELETED. Block descriptions of certain code-share arrangements approved for the same term may have been compressed into one block description to conserve space. If the authorities are not new or changed, but only compressed, the compressed descriptions will not appear in bold type. Carriers must notify the Department no later than 30-day before they begin any new code-share service under the code-share services authorized. This report is current through July 31, 2021. Changes from the previous reports are noted in bold type. Regional carriers operating for large carriers (e.g. Delta Connection, American Eagle, United Express) will be listed in the endnotes of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Freshwater Symbiotic Temnocephalans (Platyhelminthes, Rhabditophora, Temnocephalida) from the Neotropics
    Zoosyst. Evol. 90 (2) 2014, 147–162 | DOI 10.3897/zse.90.8688 museum für naturkunde Checklist of freshwater symbiotic temnocephalans (Platyhelminthes, Rhabditophora, Temnocephalida) from the Neotropics Andrés Martínez-Aquino1, Francisco Brusa1, Cristina Damborenea1 1 División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, FCNyM, UNLP, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina http://zoobank.org/286A18D5-FBB4-47E8-93D2-778718848F14 Corresponding author: Cristina Damborenea ([email protected]) Abstract Received 20 July 2014 Based on published records and original data derived from our research, we have generat- Accepted 1 September 2014 ed a checklist of symbiotic temnocephalan fauna from 57 taxa of freshwater invertebrate Published 10 October 2014 and vertebrate hosts from 16 families included in four classes from the Neotropics. The checklist contains 38 nominal species from 3 genera belonging to the Temnocephalida Academic editor: families Diceratocephalidae, Didymorchidae and Temnocephalidae. All taxa (35) of the David Gibson genus Temnocephala are endemic to the Neotropics and 14 (40%) are considered micro- endemic (i.e. only one record each from a single locality). While only one species and Key Words one variety of Didymorchis are known from the Neotropics; there are also two putative undescribed species of this genus. Only Diceratocephala boschmai (Diceratocephalidae) Temnocephala is reported as an introduced species from Uruguay. Host specificity to a particular group Didymorchis of invertebrates and vertebrates is the
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetological Journal FULL PAPER
    Volume 29 (January 2019), 23-36 Herpetological Journal FULL PAPER https://doi.org/10.33256/hj29.1.2336 Published by the British A new species of Contomastix (Squamata, Teiidae) Herpetological Society supported by total evidence, with remarks on diagnostic characters defining the genus Mario R. Cabrera1,5, Santiago Carreira2, Diego O. Di Pietro3 & Paula C. Rivera4,5 1Museo de Zoología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina 2Laboratorio de Sistemática e Historia Natural de Vertebrados, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, UdelaR, and Sección Herpetología, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Montevideo, Uruguay 3Sección Herpetología, División Zoología Vertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina 4Universidad Nacional de Chilecito, La Rioja, Argentina 5Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal (IDEA), CONICET/UNC, Córdoba, Argentina Formerly Cnemidophorus was thought to be the most speciose genus of Teiidae. This genus comprised four morphological groups that were later defined as four different genera, Ameivula, Aurivela, Cnemidophorus and Contomastix. The last appears as paraphyletic in a recent phylogenetic reconstruction based on morphology, but monophyletic in a reconstruction using molecular characters. Six species are allocated to Contomastix. One of them, C. lacertoides, having an extensive and disjunct geographic distribution in Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil. Preliminary analyses revealed morphological differences among its populations, suggesting that it is actually a complex of species. Here, we describe a new species corresponding to the Argentinian populations hitherto regarded as C. lacertoides, by integrating morphological and molecular evidence. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the presence of notched proximal margin of the tongue is a character that defines the genus Contomastix.
    [Show full text]
  • Application to the Public Utilities Commission for Route Permits Big
    Otter Tail Corporation dba Otter Tail Power Company Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Great River Energy Heartland Consumers Power District Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (as represented by Missouri River Energy Services) Application to the Public Utilities Commission for Route Permits Big Stone Transmission Project December 9, 2005 MNPUC Docket No. E017, et. al./TR-05-1275 BIG STONE TRANSMISSION PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE MORRIS 230 KV TRANSMISSION LINE ROUTE .............................................................. 2 1.2 THE WILLMAR TRANSMISSION LINE ROUTE ......................................................................... 3 1.3 THE GRANITE FALLS 345 KV TRANSMISSION LINE ROUTE................................................ 3 1.4 TRANSMISSION LINE STRUCTURES .......................................................................................... 3 1.5 ASSOCIATED FACILITIES ........................................................................................................... 4 1.5.1 Substation Modifications .......................................................................................... 4 1.5.2 Transmission Line Modifications ............................................................................ 4 1.6 COSTS..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]