DOCSLIB.ORG

Belarus PROJECT DOCUMENT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Belarus PROJECT DOCUMENT United Nations Development Programme Country: Belarus PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation into Territorial Planning Policies and Practices UNDP Strategic Plan Environment and Sustainable Development Primary Outcome: Mainstreaming environment and energy Expected CP Outcome(s)/Indicator(s): Programme Component 3: Environmental Sustainability; Outcome 11: Biodiversity, ecosystem services, protected areas and other commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity and other multilateral environmental agreements integrated into national governance and production systems (including social, economic and policy frameworks such as MDGs, NSSEDS and key sectors such as agriculture, forestry, energy, and flood control) Expected CPAP Output(s)/Indicator(s): Protected areas, hectares Implementing partner: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection (MNREP) Brief Description The project objective is to mainstream biodiversity conservation priorities into Belarus’ territorial planning policies and practices. The project will remove systemic, regulatory and knowledge barriers to mainstreaming biodiversity conservation into territorial planning. The objective will be achieved through two outcomes: i) Enabling regulatory, policy and institutional framework for land-use planning that reflects biodiversity considerations outside protected areas, and ii) Tested models for development and enforcement of biodiversity-compatible land-use plans at the district levels. The immediate global biodiversity benefits include enhanced ecosystem integrity outside PAs in 10 administrative districts (approximately 2 million hectares). In the long-term, taking into account the sought replication effect, the project will ensure the long-term integrity of fragile ecosystems over 36% of the country. Programme Period: 2006-2010 Total budget 8,055,300 Atlas Award ID: 00058307 Total allocated resources: 8,055,300 Atlas Project ID: 00072384 o GEF 971,000 PIMS: 3985 o MNREP 100,000 Start date: November 2009 o State Committee on Property 2,200,000 End Date: December 2013 o Ministry of Forestry 4,784,300 LPAC Meeting Date: t.b.d Management Arrangements: NEX Agreed by (Government): NAME SIGNATURE Date/Month/Year Agreed by (Executing Entity/Implementing Partner): NAME SIGNATURE Date/Month/Year Agreed by (UNDP): NAME SIGNATURE Date/Month/Year (August 09) 1 of 89 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 3 1. SITUATION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 GEOGRAPHIC AND BIODIVERSITY CONTEXT ..................................................................................................... 4 1.2 STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY OUTSIDE PROTECTED AREAS .................................................................................. 4 1.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT.............................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 KEY DRIVERS OF THE LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OUTSIDE PROTECTED AREAS ...... 6 1.5 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRESERVATION OF RARE SPECIES AND ECOSYSTEMS .... 8 1.6 TERRITORIAL PLANNING AS AN ENTRY POINT FOR MAINSTREAMING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ......... 12 1.7 DESIRED LONG-TERM SOLUTION ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.8 BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING THE DESIRED LONG-TERM SOLUTION .................................................................... 13 2. PROJECT STRATEGY ........................................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 CONFORMITY WITH GEF POLICY ................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 COUNTRY OWNERSHIP: COUNTRY ELIGIBILITY AND COUNTRY DRIVEN-NESS ........................................... 15 2.3 PROJECT GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS ............................................................................... 15 2.4 KEY INDICATORS, RISKS AND ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................................ 21 2.5 INCREMENTAL COST ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................. 22 2.6 COST-EFFECTIVENESS ..................................................................................................................................... 24 2.7 SUSTAINABILITY .............................................................................................................................................. 25 2.8 REPLICABILITY ................................................................................................................................................ 25 3. PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................. 27 4. MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 31 4.1 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................................................... 31 4.2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 31 4.3 AUDIT ARRANGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 33 4.4 COORDINATION WITH OTHER RELATED INITIATIVES...................................................................................... 33 4.5 USE OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGOS ON PROJECT DELIVERABLES ......................................................................... 34 5. MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND EVALUATION.................................................................................. 35 5.1 PROJECT START ................................................................................................................................................ 35 5.2 QUARTERLY ..................................................................................................................................................... 35 5.3 ANNUALLY ...................................................................................................................................................... 36 5.4 PERIODIC MONITORING THROUGH SITE VISITS .............................................................................................. 36 5.5 MID-TERM OF PROJECT CYCLE ........................................................................................................................ 36 5.6 END OF PROJECT .............................................................................................................................................. 36 5.7 LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING .......................................................................................................... 37 6 LEGAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................... 38 7. ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................................................ 39 (August 09) 2 of 89 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APR Annual Project Review ATLAS UNDP’s Enterprise Resources Platform AWP Annual Work Plan CO Country Office CP (UNDP) Country Programme CPAP (UNDP) Country Programme Action Plan Dept. Department EIA Environmental Impact Assessment FSC Forest Stewardship Council GEF Global Environment Facility GOB Government of Belarus Ha Hectares IC Incremental cost IR Inception Report IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature IW Inception Workshop LPAC Local Project Appraisal Committee M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MNREP Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection MSP Medium Size Project NAP National Action Plan NEX National Execution NGO Non-government Organization NPM National Project Manager PAs Protected Areas PB Project Board PBM Project Board Meeting PIMS Project Information Management System PIR Project Implementation Review PIU Project Implementation Unit PPG Project Preparation Grant PSC Project Steering Committee RCU Regional Coordination Unit SBAA Standard Basic Assistance Agreement SO Strategic Objective SP Strategic Priority SRF Strategic Results Framework TORs Terms of Reference TPR Tri-partite Review TTR Terminal Tri-partite Review UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNDP-CO United Nations Development Programme – Country Office UNDP-GEF United Nations Development Programme – Global Environment Facility Unit UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change USD United States Dollar (August 09) 3 of 89 1. SITUATION ANALYSIS 1.1 Geographic and biodiversity context 1. Belarus is a land-locked country situated along the Western Dvina and Dnieper Rivers. It is bordered to the west by Poland, north by Latvia and Lithuania, east by Russia, and south by Ukraine. The total land area of 207,598 square kilometers is divided into 6 regions (oblasts) – Brest, Vitebsk, Gomel,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elaboration of Priority Components of the Transboundary Neman/Nemunas River Basin Management Plan (Key Findings)
    Elaboration of Priority Components of the Transboundary Neman/Nemunas River Basin Management Plan (Key Findings) June 2018 Disclaimer: This report was prepared with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 1 OVERVIEW OF THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS ............................... 5 1.1 General description of the Neman River basin on the territory of Belarus .......................... 5 1.2 Description of the hydrographic network ............................................................................. 9 1.3 General description of land runoff changes and projections with account of climate change........................................................................................................................................ 11 2 IDENTIFICATION (DELINEATION) AND TYPOLOGY OF SURFACE WATER BODIES IN THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS ............................................................................. 12 3 IDENTIFICATION (DELINEATION) AND MAPPING OF GROUNDWATER BODIES IN THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ................................................................................................................................... 16 4 IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES OF HEAVY IMPACT AND EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY ON SURFACE WATER BODIES
    [Show full text]
  • Review-Chronicle of Human Violations in Belarus in 2009
    The Human Rights Center Viasna Review-Chronicle of Human Violations in Belarus in 2009 Minsk 2010 Contents A year of disappointed hopes ................................................................7 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2009....................................................................9 Freedom to peaceful assemblies .................................................................................10 Activities of security services .....................................................................................11 Freedom of association ...............................................................................................12 Freedom of information ..............................................................................................13 Harassment of civil and political activists ..................................................................14 Politically motivated criminal cases ...........................................................................14 Freedom of conscience ...............................................................................................15 Prisoners’ rights ..........................................................................................................16 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in February 2009................................................................17 Politically motivated criminal cases ...........................................................................19 Harassment of
    [Show full text]
  • Review-Chronicle
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 1999 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 1999 INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS The year of 1999 was the last year of Alexander Lukashenka’s original mandate. In 1994 having used the machinery of democratic procedure he was elected president of the Republic of Belarus for five years term. But in 1996 A.Lukashenka conducted illegal, non-free and unfair referendum and by it prolonged his mandate to seven years. Constitutional Court’s judges and deputies of the Supreme Soviet that resisted to A.Lukashenka’s dictatorial intentions were dismissed. Thus provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus were broken. Attempt to conduct presidential elections done by the legitimate Supreme Soviet of the 13th convocation was supported by the most influential opposition parties and movements. But Belarusan authorities did their best to prevent opposition from succeeding in presidential elections and subjected people involved in election campaign to different kinds of repressions. Regime didn’t balk at anything in the struggle with its opponents. Detentions and arrests, persecutions of its organisers and participants, warnings, penalties and imprisonment followed every opposition-organised action… Yet the year of 1999 became a year of mass actions of protest of Belarusan people against a union with Russia imposed by the authorities to the people. In 1999 the OSCE Advisory and Monitoring Group in Belarus made an attempt to arrange talks between Belarusan authorities and opposition. This year will go down to history as a year when some of prominent politicians and fighters against the regime disappeared, when unprecedented number of criminal proceedings against opposition leaders and participants of mass actions of protest was instituted..
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Places Europe: 108 Destinations
    Reviews from Sacred Places Around the World “… the ruins, mountains, sanctuaries, lost cities, and pilgrimage routes held sacred around the world.” (Book Passage 1/2000) “For each site, Brad Olsen provides historical background, a description of the site and its special features, and directions for getting there.” (Theology Digest Summer, 2000) “(Readers) will thrill to the wonderful history and the vibrations of the world’s sacred healing places.” (East & West 2/2000) “Sites that emanate the energy of sacred spots.” (The Sunday Times 1/2000) “Sacred sites (to) the ruins, sanctuaries, mountains, lost cities, temples, and pilgrimage routes of ancient civilizations.” (San Francisco Chronicle 1/2000) “Many sacred places are now bustling tourist and pilgrimage desti- nations. But no crowd or souvenir shop can stand in the way of a traveler with great intentions and zero expectations.” (Spirituality & Health Summer, 2000) “Unleash your imagination by going on a mystical journey. Brad Olsen gives his take on some of the most amazing and unexplained spots on the globe — including the underwater ruins of Bimini, which seems to point the way to the Lost City of Atlantis. You can choose to take an armchair pilgrimage (the book is a fascinating read) or follow his tips on how to travel to these powerful sites yourself.” (Mode 7/2000) “Should you be inspired to make a pilgrimage of your own, you might want to pick up a copy of Brad Olsen’s guide to the world’s sacred places. Olsen’s marvelous drawings and mysterious maps enhance a package that is as bizarre as it is wonderfully acces- sible.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media in Belarus
    Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ) MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Minsk 2009 CONTENTS Results of 2008 in the Sphere of Mass Media in Belarus …………………………………………………………………………… 3 Statistical Information ……………………………………………………… 7 Changes in Legislation ……………………………………………………… 8 Summons to the Prosecutor’s Office. Warnings Issued by the Prosecutor’s Office and by the Ministry of Information ………………………………………………………………………… 12 Attacks on Journalists, Detentions, Attempts of Pressure ……………………………………………………………………………... 17 Interference in Professional Independence of Editions. Censorship …………………………………………………………………………. 27 Infringements Related to Access to Information (Refusals to Grant Information, Restrictive Use of the Institute of Accreditation) …………………………………………….….. 29 Conflicts Related to Reception and Distribution of Foreign Information or Activity of Foreign Mass Media … 35 Economic Pressure, Obstacles to Printing and Distribution ………………………………………………………………………… 38 Conflicts Related to Elections …………………………………………. 45 Judicial conflicts with participation of mass media subjects ……………………………………………………………………………… 49 Mass-media in Belarus: 2008 Results of 2008 in the Sphere of Mass Media in Belarus The year 2008 has turned out difficult and ambiguous for the Belarusian journalism. Despite of some positive changes at the end of one year, the most important problems in the sphere of mass media (economic discredit of independent editions, discrepancy of legislation in the sphere of mass media to democratic standards, restrictions of access to information) have not been resolved. The first months of 2008 have been especially worrying. On January 18 deputy chief editor of the newspaper "Zhoda" Aliaksandr Zdvizhkou was sentenced to 3 years of imprisonment for «kindling of religious enmity» (Part 2, Article 130 of the Criminal Code). The newspaper was closed back in 2006 following the suit of the Ministry of information for reprinting some of the Danish caricatures featuring prophet Mohammad.
    [Show full text]
  • Grodno Region
    GRODNO REGION Preliminary Approximate cadastral № Location land plot Possible ways of use Infrastructure Encumbrances value, area, ha thousand USD Grodno city 1 Eandoursk motorway, near the 0,84 service station to be determined by no 216,72 filling station technical conditions 2 building estate "Baranovichi-1" 0,34 food services area, retail to be determined by 156,07 business technical conditions 3 to the south-east of the intersection 0,24 construction of a public facility to be determined by 303,75 of Dubko and Pushkina streets technical conditions 4 Gornovych str. (former territory of 1,75 construction of a shopping to be determined by 1930,6 the tannery) and service center technical conditions Berestovica district 5 Bol'shaya Berestovica town 0.23 construction of a retail facility available no 27 6 Berestovitskysettlement, Matrosova district, near str. the 3,54 the organization of the system determined by technical no 5,66 checkpoint across the state border of electronic queue of vehicles conditions and border security at the checkpoint "Berestovitsa" Volkovysk district 7 Volkovysk town, S.Pankovoj str. 1 cultural and recreational water pipeline, gas no 345,7 center, exhibition hall pipeline, sewerage, heating, electricity are available 8 Volkovysk town, Zenitchikov str. 2 production facility water pipeline, gas no 582 pipeline, sewerage, heating, electricity are available 9 Volkovysk town, Rokossovskogo 1 production facility water pipeline, gas no 153,9 str. pipeline, sewerage, electricity are available 10 Volkovysk town, 2 production facility water pipeline, gas no 264,6 Oktyabr'skaya str. pipeline, sewerage, (in the area of OJSC electricity are available "Volkovyskspectrans") 11 Volkovysk town, 10 production and storage facility water pipeline, gas no 1323 Oktyabr'skaya str.
    [Show full text]
  • Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No. 208 of April 16, 2002 [Amended As of April 30, 2015]
    Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No. 208 of April 16, 2002 [Amended as of April 30, 2015] On Establishment of Free Economic Zone “Grodnoinvest” With a view of attracting domestic and foreign investments to promote further development of export-oriented industries based on the novel and high technologies, to provide favorable conditions for restructuring of the national economy and efficient utilization of the available production facilities, I hereby decree to: 1. To create the free economic zone “Grodnoinvest” of the total area of 3079.17 ha within the boundaries determined by the Grodno Regional Executive Committee according to the Annex for the period of 30 years. 2. To establish that: 2.1. the free economic zone “Grodnoinvest” (hereinafter -- the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”) is a complex zone; 2.2. financing of the development of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”, including industrial, engineering, transport and other infrastructure along with the maintenance of the administrations of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and other expenses stipulated by the legislations for ensuring functioning of the zone, is carried out at the account of the means of the republic budget and the development fund of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”. The development fund of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” is formed at the account of rent payments for land plots located within the boundaries of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and of the Special tourist and recreational park “Avgustovki canal” and provided into lease to its residents, rent payments for the property being in the operative administration of the administrations of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”, as well as at the account of revenues in accordance with the contracts on activity conditions in the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and the Special tourist and recreational park “Avgustovki canal”.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR9223 Implementation Status & Results Belarus Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Operation Name: Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 6 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 01-Jan-2013 Country: Belarus Approval FY: 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Board Approval Date 17-Jun-2010 Original Closing Date 30-Dec-2016 Planned Mid Term Review Date 16-Sep-2013 Last Archived ISR Date 07-Aug-2012 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 06-Oct-2010 Revised Closing Date 30-Dec-2016 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) (i) Improve environmental benefits of integrated solid waste management in Grodno through recovery and reuse of recycable materials in line with good international standards; (ii) Strengthen national capacity to manage hazardous wastes associated with POPs. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Program? Public Disclosure Authorized Yes No Belarus POPs Stockpile Management Project (GEF) (P111110) Global Environmental Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) Reduce environmental and health risks associated with the presence and release of POPs in global and local environments. Has the Global Environmental Objective been changed since
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus Integrated Solid Waste Management Project Component III
    MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Public Disclosure Authorized BELARUS INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT Component III Persistent Organic Pollutant Stockpile Management Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Assessment Minsk January, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Final Report Public Disclosure Authorized TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF LOCATION ................................................................................................................................................. 4 SHORT COUNTRY PROFILE ................................................................................................................................. 5 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 15 1.1 EIA SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 16 1.2 EIA METHODOLOGY ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY SECTION Belarus Game Trophies Plants
    Validity date from COUNTRY Belarus 10/08/2007 00035 SECTION Game trophies plants Date of publication 15/01/2020 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 02088/0319016 State Forest Enterprises Starobin forestry Starobin Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 0649122 BELKOOPOPTTORG Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 100021168 UP Minsky Parnikovo-teplichny Kombinat Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT2, CAT3 20/09/2011 100150558 Production Trade Unitary Enterprise Voenohot Public Association Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 Belarusian military- hunting enterprise 101131971 State Forest Enterprises “Minsk forestry” Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 191090820 PC AnFrid Zhodino Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200017622 State Forestry Enterprise Baranovichskij leshoz Baranovichi Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200026472 State Forestry Enterprise Pruzhanskij leshoz Prugany Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200034591 JV Variant Ltd Bereza Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200041354 State Forestry Enterprise Kobrinskij leshoz Kobrin Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200056212 State Protective Institution National Park Kamenyki, Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 07/09/2011 200062459 Establishment “Brest Regional Organizational Structure” of National Brest Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 15/04/2016 Public Association “Belarusian Society of Hunters and Fishermen” 200099512 State Forestry Enterprise Telehanskij leshoz Telehany Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200100542 State Forestry Enterprise Ivatsevichskij leshoz Ivatsevichi Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 1 / 16 List in force Approval number Name City
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR14344 Implementation Status & Results Belarus Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Operation Name: Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 11 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 06-May-2014 Country: Belarus Approval FY: 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Board Approval Date 17-Jun-2010 Original Closing Date 30-Dec-2016 Planned Mid Term Review Date 25-Sep-2013 Last Archived ISR Date 03-Dec-2013 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 06-Oct-2010 Revised Closing Date 30-Dec-2016 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) (i) Improve environmental benefits of integrated solid waste management in Grodno through recovery and reuse of recycable materials in line with good international standards; (ii) Strengthen national capacity to manage hazardous wastes associated with POPs. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Program? Public Disclosure Authorized Yes No Belarus POPs Stockpile Management Project (GEF) (P111110) Global Environmental Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) Reduce environmental and health risks associated with the presence and release of POPs in global and local environments. Has the Global Environmental Objective been changed
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR15716 Implementation Status & Results Belarus Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Operation Name: Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 12 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 11-Aug-2014 Country: Belarus Approval FY: 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Board Approval Date 17-Jun-2010 Original Closing Date 30-Dec-2016 Planned Mid Term Review Date 21-Apr-2014 Last Archived ISR Date 06-May-2014 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 06-Oct-2010 Revised Closing Date 30-Dec-2016 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Integrated Solid Waste Management Project (P114515) Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) (i) Improve environmental benefits of integrated solid waste management in Grodno through recovery and reuse of recycable materials in line with good international standards; (ii) Strengthen national capacity to manage hazardous wastes associated with POPs. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Program? Public Disclosure Authorized Yes No Belarus POPs Stockpile Management Project (GEF) (P111110) Global Environmental Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) Reduce environmental and health risks associated with the presence and release of POPs in global and local environments. Has the Global Environmental Objective been changed
    [Show full text]