DOCSLIB.ORG

SPECIAL PUBLICATION No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPECIAL PUBLICATION No The J. L. B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 14 COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES OF THE FISHES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA PART I MARINE FISHES by Margaret M. Smith RHODES UNIVERSITY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA April 1975 COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES OF THE FISHES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA PART I MARINE FISHES by Margaret M. Smith INTRODUCTION In earlier times along South Africa’s 3 000 km coastline were numerous isolated communities. Interested in angling and pursuing commercial fishing on a small scale, the inhabitants gave names to the fishes that they caught. First, in 1652, came the Dutch Settlers who gave names of well-known European fishes to those that they found at the Cape. Names like STEENBRAS, KABELJOU, SNOEK, etc., are derived from these. Malay slaves and freemen from the East brought their names with them, and many were manufactured or adapted as the need arose. The Afrikaans names for the Cape fishes are relatively uniform. Only as the distance increases from the Cape — e.g. at Knysna, Plettenberg Bay and Port Elizabeth, do they exhibit alteration. The English names started in the Eastern Province and there are different names for the same fish at towns or holiday resorts sometimes not 50 km apart. It is therefore not unusual to find one English name in use at the Cape, another at Knysna, and another at Port Elizabeth differing from that at East London. The Transkeians use yet another name, and finally Natal has a name quite different from all the rest. The indigenous peoples of South Africa contributed practically no names to the fishes, as only the early Strandlopers were fish eaters and we know nothing of their language. The Bantu peoples migrating down from the north were pastoralists and agriculturalists, not fishermen. The Pondo, Xhosa and Fingo peoples that reached the Transkei kept out of sight and sound of the sea. Only the outcasts existed in this coastal strip. Some tribes considered fish flesh akin to snake flesh, and by custom and taboo most tribes were prohibited from eating it. This is a tradition which persists in some areas even to this day. Half a century ago all the different common names produced little confusion. Groups were too isolated. Then the country’s communications improved. A quarter of a century ago J.L.B. Smith collected all the common names he could and published them in his SEA FISHES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA, each, with its locality, carefully attached to the description and figure of the fish so named. He argued that in this way confusion 1 would be avoided and, by referring to the illustration, everyone would be able to ascertain exactly which fish was being discussed. While going a long way to unravel the confusion the SEA FISHES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA did not resolve it, mainly because of man’s inherent laziness and carelessness and owing to the fact that the SEA FISHES, weighing nearly 3 kg, can hardly be tucked into a fishing-bag. Today the necessity to standardise the common names of our fishes is recognised by all sections of the community including the angling fraternity. As early as 1959, L.P.D. Gertenbach in his unpublished Ph.D. thesis on “Marine fishery industries and commerce of the Union of South Africa and South West Africa” states: ‘The fish-producers, fish-traders, fish-consumers, legislators, inspectors, mana­ gers of factories, depots, transport firms, exporters, housewives, etc., all have an interest in a clear, unambiguous labelling of fishery products. The realities of the modern world-economy demand the standardization of the English and Afrikaans common names of at least that hundred or so species of economic significance.5 Nowadays, with good roads, air travel and more leisure, South Africa has not only shrunk, but is no longer isolated at the tip of a continent. A man can fish off Angola one day and in Durban waters the next. Big game anglers come from all over the world. Fleets of many nations fish the fringe of, and beyond, our territorial waters, and endemic fishes such as South African hake, snoek, pilchards, kingklip, etc., can be seen daily on Japanese, Russian, Spanish and other markets. Commerce, law and sport need trade names, names for aquarium fishes, for legal terminology and for general use. Substitutes for scientific names are needed for the increasing number of inland aquaria, for popular and scientific writing in encyclopaedias, dictionaries, popular and scientific magazines, newspaper reports and record lists. It has been shown that common names carefully chosen can be more stable than scientific names, as witness the list given by Gilchrist (1902)1 wherein almost all the scientific names are obsolete but the common names are Just the same today. Even as far back as 1682 Claudius, one of the early travellers to South Africa, labelled his illustrations of Cape fishes with names such as SONVIS and KNORHAAN that are still in use for those same species today. In 1948 the United States of America brought out their first official list of 570 common names, in 1960 there were 1852 species and the most recent list, published in 1970, covers 2131 species. The experience gained by American ichthyologists (Bailey et al, 1970)2 in drawing up their lists of common and scientific names has been invaluable in compiling this list and here are some of the guidelines: Gilchrist, J.D.F. (1902) History of the local names of Cape fish. Tram, S. Afr. phil Soc. 11 (4) : 207-232. ^Bailey, Fitch, Herald, Lachner, Lindsey, Robins &. Scott: A list of common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada (3rd edition). Spec. Publ. Am. Fish. Soc. (6) 150pp. 2 PRINCIPLES FOLLOWED 1. A single vernacular name for each official language shall be accepted for each species or taxonomic unit included. Where possible only one name should be used for both languages (e.g. snoek, kob). 2. No two species on the list shall have the same approved name. 3. The expression “COMMON” as part of a fish’s name shall be avoided wherever possible. Use of adjectives that also describe age or size should be avoided wherever possible. 4. Simplicity in names is favoured. Preference shall be given to names that are short and euphonious. Hyphens, suffices and apostrophes shall be omitted except where they are essential (e.g. three-eyed), are necessary to avoid a misunderstanding, or in Afrikaans names (see below). Compounded modifying words, including paired structures, should usually be treated as singular nouns in apposition with a group name (e.g. soupfin shark), but a plural modifier should usually be placed in adjectival form (e.g. spotted grunter). The compounding of brief familiar words into a single unhyphened name may in some cases promote clarity and simplicity (e.g. rockcod, goldfish), but habitual practice of combining words, especially those that are lengthy, awkward or un­ familiar, is avoided. 5. Common names shall not be capitalised in text use except for proper names (e.g. frigate mackerel, but Natal wrasse). 6. Where possible, names intended to honour persons should be avoided as they are without descriptive value (e.g. Allison’s tuna or Smith’s clingfish). 7. Only clearly defined and well-marked taxonomic entities (usually species) shall be assigned common names. Most subspecies are not suitable for common names unless they are sufficiently different in appearance to be distinguished readily by laymen. The practice of adding geographic modifiers to designate regional populations makes for a cumber­ some terminology. Hybrids in general are not named. 8. The common name, while often based on the scientific name, shall not be tied intimately and permanently to the scientific name. Thus the changing of a scientific name will not entail changing the common name. This leads to the common name being more stable than the scientific name as it is not the function of the common name to indicate relationship. When two or more taxonomic groups (e.g. nominal species) are found to be identical, one name shall be adopted for the combined group. 9. Names shall not violate the tenets of good taste. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Regardless of origin, and in spite of (2) below, truly vernacular names that are widespread and in common use by the public are to be retained wherever possible. Elf is a good example, called bluefish and tailor elsewhere. 3 2. Names for circumglobal or wide-ranging species among the English-speaking peoples of the world should where possible be retained: barracuda, Spanish mackerel, all the different tunnies, various sharks. By the same token universally used names should not be attached to completely different species, like barracouta for a mackerel or blue pointer for the great white shark. 3. Under certain circumstances commonly employed names adopted from traditional Europea (mainly English and Dutch) usage can be given latitude in taxonomic placemen* ve*S* snoek from seesnoek, a gempylid, Thyrsites atun, far removed from the freshwater pike (snoek) of Europe). It is here suggested that kabeljou for Argyrosuma hololepidotus, a sciaenid, be shortened to kob to sever its connection with the European cod (family Gadidae) known as kabeljou or kabeljauw. 4. Colourful, romantic, fanciful, metaphorical and otherwise distinctive and original names are especially appropriate. Many of these names add to the appeal of the fish: Jumping bean, angelfish or cherub (engeltjie), prodigal son, Jewelfish are attractive names to use. 5. Structural attributes, colour and colour pattern are desirable and are in common use in forming names. Sailfin, soapy, glassy, copper, triple tail are some in use. White, black, spotted and striped should be used only when absolutely necessary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fisheries Centre
    Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia Working Paper Series Working Paper #2015 - 80 Reconstruction of Syria’s fisheries catches from 1950-2010: Signs of overexploitation Aylin Ulman, Adib Saad, Kyrstn Zylich, Daniel Pauly and Dirk Zeller Year: 2015 Email: [email protected] This working paper is made available by the Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Reconstruction of Syria’s fisheries catches from 1950-2010: Signs of overexploitation Aylin Ulmana, Adib Saadb, Kyrstn Zylicha, Daniel Paulya, Dirk Zellera a Sea Around Us, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada b President of Syrian National Committee for Oceanography, Tishreen University, Faculty of Agriculture, P.O. BOX; 1408, Lattakia, Syria [email protected] (corresponding author); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Syria’s total marine fisheries catches were estimated for the 1950-2010 time period using a reconstruction approach which accounted for all fisheries removals, including unreported commercial landings, discards, and recreational and subsistence catches. All unreported estimates were added to the official data, as reported by the Syrian Arab Republic to the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Total reconstructed catch for 1950-2010 was around 170,000 t, which is 78% more than the amount reported by Syria to the FAO as their national catch. The unreported components added over 74,000 t of unreported catches, of which 38,600 t were artisanal landings, 16,000 t industrial landings, over 4,000 t recreational catches, 3,000 t subsistence catches and around 12,000 t were discards.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa: Afrikaans Film and the Imagined Boundaries of Afrikanerdom
    A new laager for a “new” South Africa: Afrikaans film and the imagined boundaries of Afrikanerdom Adriaan Stefanus Steyn Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Social Anthropology in the faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr Bernard Dubbeld Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology December 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. December 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract The Afrikaans film industry came into existence in 1916, with the commercial release of De Voortrekkers (Shaw), and, after 1948, flourished under the guardianship of the National Party. South Africa’s democratic transition, however, seemed to announce the death of the Afrikaans film. In 1998, the industry entered a nine-year slump during which not a single Afrikaans film was released on the commercial circuit. Yet, in 2007, the industry was revived and has been expanding rapidly ever since. This study is an attempt to explain the Afrikaans film industry’s recent success and also to consider some of its consequences. To do this, I situate the Afrikaans film industry within a larger – and equally flourishing – Afrikaans culture industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 an Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyans of South Africa 1 2 3
    1 An annotated checklist of the chondrichthyans of South Africa 2 3 4 DAVID A. EBERT1, 2, 3, 6, SABINE P. WINTNER4 & PETER M. KYNE5 5 6 1 Pacific Shark Research Center, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, 7 USA 8 2 South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa 9 3 Department of Ichthyology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA 10 4 University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Durban, South Africa 11 5 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, 12 Darwin, Australia 13 14 6 Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] 15 16 David A. Ebert ORCID ID 0000-0003-4604-8192 17 Sabine P. Wintner ORCID ID 0000-0001-7350-5999 18 Peter M. Kyne ORCID ID 0000-0003-4494-2625 19 20 21 1 1 Abstract 2 3 An annotated checklist of chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, batoids, and chimaeras) 4 occurring in South African waters is presented. The checklist is the result of decades of 5 research and on-going systematic revisions of the regional fauna. The chondrichthyan 6 fauna of South Africa is one of the richest in the world with 191 species, comprising 50 7 families and 103 genera. It consists of 30 families, 64 genera, and 111 species of sharks; 8 17 families, 36 genera, and 72 species of batoids; and, 3 families, 5 genera, and 8 species 9 of chimaeras. The most species-rich shark families are the whaler sharks Carcharhinidae 10 with 20 species followed by the deepwater catsharks Pentanchidae with 13 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Produksie Notas
    - 1 - - 2 - INLEIDING Die oorspronklike konsep van 'Liefling die Movie' is geformuleer deur Paul Kruger in 2008. Voor- produksie het in 2009 begin en die rolprent sal hierdie somer op 19 November in Suid Afrika vrygestel word. Dit is n eerste vir Suid Afrika op verskeie gebiede. Die eerste Afrikaanse musiekblyspel wat in 30 jaar op die groot skerm vertoon sal word. Die room van Suid Afrikaanse produksie spanne, kunstenaars en akteurs is betrek. Die film is binne drie maande in en om Hartbeespoortdam in Noordwes geskiet. Die film is vervaardig onder die vaandel van Hartiwood Films met Paul Kruger as die leier en fotografiese regisseur van die Liefling-span. 24 Afrikaanse liedjies is verwerk deur Johan Heystek en die choreograaf is Raymond Theart. Brian Webber is die regisseur van die opwindende dans en sangervaring in 'Liefling, die Movie' LIGGING Liefling, die Movie is hoofsaaklik in die dorpie Hartbeespoort in die Noordwes Provinsie geskiet. Die dorp is om die Hartbeespoortdam gebou. Dit is geleë suid van die Magaliesberge en noord van die Witwatersberge, ongeveer 35km wes van Pretoria. Die panoramiese uitsig en bergagtige ligging het meegebring dat Hartbeespoort n gewilde uitspanplek vir stedelinge geword het.Dit bied n verskeidenheid van water- en lugsport aan besoekers, spog ook met n akwarium, private dieretuin, slangpark,en kabelspoor. Die pragtige natuurskoon is n perfekte agtergrond vir rolprent. - 3 - LIEFLING – DIE LIEDJIE - LIRIEKE Jy weet dat ek nie sonder jou kan bestaan nie Jy weet dat jy ook nie alleen kan bestaan nie Dit
    [Show full text]
  • Trait Decoupling Promotes Evolutionary Diversification of The
    Trait decoupling promotes evolutionary diversification of the trophic and acoustic system of damselfishes rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Bruno Fre´de´rich1, Damien Olivier1, Glenn Litsios2,3, Michael E. Alfaro4 and Eric Parmentier1 1Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Applied and Fundamental Fish Research Center, Universite´ de Lie`ge, 4000 Lie`ge, Belgium 2Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Research 3Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Ge´nopode, Quartier Sorge, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA Cite this article: Fre´de´rich B, Olivier D, Litsios G, Alfaro ME, Parmentier E. 2014 Trait decou- Trait decoupling, wherein evolutionary release of constraints permits special- pling promotes evolutionary diversification of ization of formerly integrated structures, represents a major conceptual the trophic and acoustic system of damsel- framework for interpreting patterns of organismal diversity. However, few fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 281: 20141047. empirical tests of this hypothesis exist. A central prediction, that the tempo of morphological evolution and ecological diversification should increase http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1047 following decoupling events, remains inadequately tested. In damselfishes (Pomacentridae), a ceratomandibular ligament links the hyoid bar and lower jaws, coupling two main morphofunctional units directly involved in both feeding and sound production. Here, we test the decoupling hypothesis Received: 2 May 2014 by examining the evolutionary consequences of the loss of the ceratomandib- Accepted: 9 June 2014 ular ligament in multiple damselfish lineages. As predicted, we find that rates of morphological evolution of trophic structures increased following the loss of the ligament.
    [Show full text]
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis
    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West
    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019)
    IUCN Red List version 2019-3: Table 7 Last Updated: 10 December 2019 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2018 (IUCN Red List version 2018-2) and 2019 (IUCN Red List version 2019-3) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered [CR(PE) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct), CR(PEW) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct in the Wild)], EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2018) List (2019) change version Category
    [Show full text]
  • “The Secret Lives of Seahorses” Exhibit Press Kit Click on Headings Below to Go Directly to a Specific Page of the Press Kit
    “The Secret Lives of Seahorses” Exhibit Press Kit Click on headings below to go directly to a specific page of the press kit. 1. Main Exhibit News Release 2. Exhibit Fact Sheet 3. Exhibit Gallery Tour 4. Exhibit Animals 5. Seahorse Conservation News Release NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For information contact: March 23, 2009 Angela Hains: (831) 647-6804; [email protected] Karen Jeffries: (831) 644-7548; [email protected] Ken Peterson: (831) 648-4922; [email protected] DURING ITS SILVER ANNIVERSARY YEAR, AQUARIUM UNVEILS “THE SECRET LIVES OF SEAHORSES” ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ New special exhibition offers an intimate look at these fascinating, fragile fishes Seahorses have been celebrated in art, literature and mythology for centuries, so you’d think we know a lot about them. In “The Secret Lives of Seahorses,” the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s new special exhibition, you’ll discover that nothing could be further from the truth. Beginning April 6, more than 15 species of seahorses, sea dragons and pipefish will beckon visitors into the elusive world of these charismatic creatures. The Secret Lives of Seahorses highlights the varied habitats in which seahorses and their relatives live, and shares important stories about the threats they face in the wild. “Seahorses are wonderful ambassadors for ocean conservation because they live in the most endangered habitats in the world – coral reefs, sea grass beds and mangrove forests,” said Ava Ferguson, senior exhibit developer for The Secret Lives of Seahorses. “When you save a seahorse, you also save some of Earth’s most precious marine habitats.” Through wrought-iron gates, visitors will enter the first gallery, “Seahorses and Kin,” and meet the seahorse family: fishes that have fused jaws and bony plates in place of the scales normally associated with fish.
    [Show full text]
  • SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin #9
    ISSN 1025-7497 South Pacific Commission TRADITIONAL Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Number 9 — February 1998 INFORMATION BULLETIN Group Co-ordinator and Bulletin Editor: Kenneth Ruddle, Matsugaoka-cho 11-20, Nishinomiya-shi, Hyogo-ken 662, Japan. [Tel: (81) 798 71 2904; Fax: (81) 798 71 2904 or (81) 798 71 4749; E-mail: [email protected]] Production: Information Section, Marine Resources Division, SPC, B.P. D5, 98848 Noumea Cedex, New Caledonia. [Fax: (687) 263818; E-mail: [email protected]]. Printed with financial assistance from the Government of France. Note from the coordinator The literature on traditional marine resource management and the local knowledge systems underpinning it is growing Inside rapidly for Solomon Islands. We are happy to add to that with a lead article by Simon Foale on West Nggela fish taxonomy. this issue Shankar Aswani, who recently completed his doctorate, is becoming a regular contributor. In this issue we include his What’s in a name? methodological contribution on the use of optimal foraging An analysis of the West Nggela theory. We hope that this might prove of value for fishery man- (Solomon Islands) fish taxonomy agers in the region. The third article is Julie LahnÕs update on the issues of indigenous rights and management strategies fac- by S. Foale p. 3 ing the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Allison Perry briefly describes the ÔGlobal survey of marine and estuarine The use of optimal foraging species used for traditional medicines and/or tonic foodsÕ. We theory to assess the fishing would be grateful if you would assist her by providing the strategies of Pacific island information requested in the short questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]