Le Strutture Difensive Delle Colonie Greche Di Sicilia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Le Strutture Difensive Delle Colonie Greche Di Sicilia Il presente Volume si propone di approfondire la conoscenza storica, tipologica e materica delle Francesca Scalisi strutture difensive presenti nei maggiori siti archeologici siciliani di fondazione greca, premessa in- dispensabile per un qualsiasi tipo di intervento di recupero e fruizione. Le fortificazioni sono dei monumenti fortemente emblematici per tipologia e dimensione e rappresentano, per certi versi, il volto che un insediamento offriva a chi si apprestava ad entrarvi, essendo la città antica modellata nel suo aspetto esteriore dalle mura difensive. Questa analisi sistematica sulle fortificazioni evidenzia LE STRUTTURE DIFENSIVE DELLE importanti contenuti che coinvolgono i settori scientifici relativi alle tecnologie costruttive e alle tecniche esecutive. La tessitura muraria, infatti, ci fornisce un ricco e variegato repertorio tecnologico in uso tra i secoli VII ed il IV a.C., utile per comprendere la pratica del fare architettura. COLONIE GRECHE DI SICILIA Il Volume affronta, innanzitutto, il tema della colonizzazione greca in Sicilia, in quanto la nascita Storia, tipologia, materiali delle fortificazioni è strettaente correlata alla necessità di difendersi dalle popolazioni indigene, e indaga sulle relazioni esistenti fra fortificazioni e tipologie insediative, soffermandosi, in seguito ad analizzare i vari subsistemi (fondazioni, muri, coronamenti, smaltimento delle acque) e compo- nenti (porte e torri) che costituiscono la struttura di un sistema difensivo. Segue l’elencazione di una serie di casi di studio, individuati secondo criteri di consistenza qualitativa e quantitativa delle tessiture murarie: allo studio storico, topografico e urbanistico della colonia individuata, fa seguito l’analisi dettagliata dei sistemi difensivi di ogni sito, dal cui raffronto si evidenziano, di volta in volta, le costanti e le varianti costruttive. Tutto ciò fornisce una sorta di abaco, cui gli studiosi del settore potranno attingere per le proprie ricerche. Francesca Scalisi (Palermo, 1973) architetto, Dottore di Ricerca in “Recupero e Fruizione dei Contesti Antichi, è titolare di Assegno di Ricerca sul tema “Sperimentazione dei materiali nanostrutturati nei siti archeologici di Agrigento, di Morgantina e nella Villa Romana del Casale”, presso il Dipartimento di Progetto e Costruzione Edilizia dell’Università degli Studi di Palermo. € 28,00 ISBN 978-88-89683-30-9 Francesca Scalisi LE STRUTTURE DIFENSIVE DELLE COLONIE GRECHE DI SICILIA Francesca Scalisi LE STRUTTURE DIFENSIVE DELLE COLONIE GRECHE DI SICILIA Storia, tipologia, materiali EDIZIONI ISBN 978-88-89683-30-9 2010 Copyright - tutti i diritti riservati all’autore 4 INDICE Introduzione 9 PARTE PRIMA 1. LA COLONIZZAZIONE GRECA 1.1. La definizione del termine colonia tra cultura antica e storiografia moderna 15 1.2. Le cause della colonizzazione greca in Italia 17 1.3. I miti di fondazione nella civiltà classica 21 1.4. L’organizzazione politica e la nascita delle città 22 2. GLI INSEDIAMENTI COLONIALI GRECI IN SICILIA 2.1. Le strutture urbane 29 2.2. L’organizzazione dello spazio 30 2.3. Le funzioni urbane 35 2.4. Le forme di insediamento 37 2.5. Lo sviluppo urbano 41 2.5.1. Le città ricostruite con dimensioni ridotte 44 2.5.2. Le città ricostruite con dimensioni maggiori 46 2.5.3. Le città di nuovo impianto 47 3. LE FORTIFICAZIONI: SIMBOLOGIA E NECESSITÀ 3.1. Gli insediamenti urbani e le fortificazioni 53 3.2. La forma urbis 55 3.3. Le mura cittadine 57 3.4. Il simbolismo delle mura nell’architettura greca 60 4. LE CARATTERISTICHE DELL’ARCHITETTURA MILITARE GRECA IN SICILIA 4.1. L’architettura militare in Sicilia 71 4.2. Gli elementi delle fortificazioni: strutturali e tipologici 74 4.3. Gli elementi strutturali 75 4.3.1. Le fondazioni 75 4.3.2. Le tipologie murarie 76 4.3.3. Osservazioni tecniche ed estetiche sui modi di costruire 78 4.3.4. I muri di fortificazione 80 4.3.5. Le tipologie murarie delle colonie greche di Sicilia 98 4.3.6. Il coronamento dei muri 121 4.3.7. Il deflusso delle acque 121 4.4. Gli elementi tipologici 122 5 4.4.1. Le porte 122 4.4.2. Le torri 123 5. BIBLIOGRAFIA TEMATICA 129 PARTE SECONDA 6. AGRIGENTO 6.1. Profilo storico-topografico 139 6.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 139 6.3. Il sistema difensivo 142 6.4. Bibliografia 143 7. CAMARINA 7.1. Profilo storico-topografico 149 7.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 149 7.3. Il sistema difensivo 153 7.4. Bibliografia 154 8. CEFALÙ 8.1. Profilo storico-topografico 159 8.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 159 8.3. Il sistema difensivo 163 8.4. Bibliografia 167 9. ELORO 9.1. Profilo storico-topografico 173 9.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 173 9.3. Il sistema difensivo 175 9.4. Bibliografia 176 10. ERACLEA MINOA 10.1. Profilo storico-topografico 181 10.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 181 10.3. Il sistema difensivo 183 10.4. Bibliografia 187 11. GELA 11.1. Profilo storico-topografico 191 11.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 191 11.3. Il sistema difensivo 195 11.4. Bibliografia 198 12. LENTINI 12.1. Profilo storico-topografico 205 6 Indice 12.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 207 12.3. Il sistema difensivo 209 12.4. Bibliografia 219 13. MEGARA IBLEA 13.1. Profilo storico-topografico 225 13.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 226 13.3. Il sistema difensivo 229 13.4. Bibliografia 234 14. MORGANTINA 14.1. Profilo storico-topografico 239 14.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 240 14.3. Il sistema difensivo 242 14.4. Bibliografia 243 15. NAXOS 15.1. Profilo storico-topografico 247 15.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 248 15.3. Il sistema difensivo 251 15.4. Bibliografia 252 16. SEGESTA 16.1. Profilo storico-topografico 257 16.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 257 16.3. Il sistema difensivo 258 16.4. Bibliografia 261 17. SELINUNTE 17.1. Profilo storico-topografico 265 17.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 265 17.3. Il sistema difensivo 266 17.4. Bibliografia 269 18. SIRACUSA 18.1. Profilo storico-topografico 273 18.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 274 18.3. Il sistema difensivo 275 18.4. Bibliografia 281 19. TINDARI 19.1. Profilo storico-topografico 285 19.2. L’urbanistica e l’architettura della città 286 19.3. Il sistema difensivo 287 19.4. Bibliografia 289 7 8 INTRODUZIONE L’indagine sulle strutture difensive nasce dalla volontà di rivalutare un tema raramente affrontato in modo organico, mettendo in relazione tutti i maggiori insediamenti greci presenti nell’Isola. Lo studio delle fortificazioni non risulta facile, non solo a causa della mole di questi monu- menti, ma anche a causa di problemi di natura metodologica, dato che gli scavi stratigrafici, di solito uno dei mezzi di verifica più affidabili, non sempre danno risultati chiari come negli abitati o nei santuari. Il problema vero e proprio consiste, però, nel modo di porre la problematica relativa alla costruzione di queste opere, tuttora troppo caratterizzata da pre- concetti contrastanti. Infatti, da un lato, è diffusa l’opinione che un muro di cinta sia parte integrante della definizione di una città e debba, quindi, essere postulato sin dalla sua fon- dazione; di conseguenza la città è vista come un complesso architettonicamente definito dalle proprie mura, anche indipendentemente da necessità funzionali. A questa idea si con- trappone quella che le mura di cinta, essendo costruzioni meramente funzionali, debbano es- sere state costruite solo per necessità, quindi, soltanto in caso di difesa. Queste due posizioni non si escludono del tutto a vicenda: infatti, se è vero che tempi politicamente movimentati favoriscono la costruzione di mura, è anche vero che si cerca di dare alle mura una forma rappresentativa. L’esistenza di fortificazioni urbane nelle città greche d’Occidente a partire dalla fine dell’età arcaica, è oggi ampiamente riconosciuta in molti siti della Sicilia, come Naxos, Lentini, Megara Iblea, Selinunte. La maggior parte di queste fortificazioni risalgono alla fine del sec. VI a.C. e vengono poste in relazione all’attività militare dei tiranni dell’epoca. Per alcune, però, sono state proposte date più antiche, cioè la metà del sec. VI a.C., come Camarina e Selinunte, o addirittura il sec. VII a.C., come Megara Iblea e Lentini. Propo- nendo per la prima volta, ai margini di un mondo indigeno talvolta ostile, vasti spazi urbani omogenei e pianificati, le città greche d’Occidente presentano, pertanto, cinte urbane più precoci che nel restante mondo greco. Lo studio dei sistemi difensivi nelle colonie greche di Sicilia rappresenta un argomento affascinante e complesso, perché si tratta di strutture architettoniche che racchiudono un’in- tera città e in cui entrano in gioco la fondazione della città, le sue fasi di sviluppo, nonché le innumerevoli battaglie e distruzioni che hanno caratterizzato la vita di questi centri urbani. Le fortificazioni sono dei monumenti fortemente emblematici per tipologia e dimen- sione e rappresentano, per certi versi, il volto che un insediamento offriva a chi si apprestava ad entrarvi, essendo la città antica modellata nel suo aspetto esteriore dalle mura difensive. Non è un caso che le rappresentazioni scultoree e pittoriche abbiano raffigurato brani di storia con ambientazioni suggestive, in cui le fortificazioni, spesso elemento di cornice o di sfondo, divenivano simbolo delle città stesse. Questa analisi sistematica sulle fortificazioni evidenzia importanti contenuti che coinvol- gono i settori scientifici relativi alle tecnologie costruttive e alle tecniche esecutive. La tessitura muraria, infatti, ci fornisce un ricco e variegato repertorio tecnologico in uso tra i secoli VII ed il IV a.C., utile per comprendere la pratica del fare architettura. Esempi a tal proposito sono le strutture in mattoni crudi e pietra di Gela, l’opera ciclopica presente a Cefalù, l’opera poligo- nale di Naxos, l’opera quadrata di Selinunte, Siracusa e Lentini, che rappresentano soltanto al- cuni esempi di artefatti di alto valore tecnologico.
Recommended publications
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phocian Betrayal at Thermopylae
    historia 68, 2019/4, 413–435 DOI 10.25162/historia-2019-0022 Jeffrey Rop The Phocian Betrayal at Thermopylae Abstract: This article makes three arguments regarding the Battle of Thermopylae. First, that the discovery of the Anopaea path was not dependent upon Ephialtes, but that the Persians were aware of it at their arrival and planned their attacks at Thermopylae, Artemisium, and against the Phocians accordingly. Second, that Herodotus’ claims that the failure of the Pho- cians was due to surprise, confusion, and incompetence are not convincing. And third, that the best explanation for the Phocian behavior is that they were from Delphi and betrayed their allies as part of a bid to restore local control over the sanctuary. Keywords: Thermopylae – Artemisium – Delphi – Phocis – Medism – Anopaea The courageous sacrifice of Leonidas and the Spartans is perhaps the central theme of Herodotus’ narrative and of many popular retellings of the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BCE. Even as modern historians are appropriately more critical of this heroizing impulse, they have tended to focus their attention on issues that might explain why Leo- nidas and his men fought to the death. These include discussion of the broader strategic and tactical importance of Thermopylae, the inter-relationship and chronology of the Greek defense of the pass and the naval campaign at Artemisium, the actual number of Greeks who served under Leonidas and whether it was sufficient to hold the position, and so on. While this article inevitably touches upon some of these same topics, its main purpose is to reconsider the decisive yet often overlooked moment of the battle: the failure of the 1,000 Phocians on the Anopaea path.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art Bulletin
    THE ART BULLETIN A Quarterly Published by . the College Art Association September 2009 Volume XCI Number 3 Destruction and Memory on the Athenian Acropolis Rachel Kousser The Parthenon, constructed betl-veen 447 and 432 BCE on This analysis of the Parthenon and its antecedents has also the Athenian Acropolis, stands as the most lavish, technically a broader significance as part of the history of Orientalism, a refined, and programmatically cohesive temple on the Greek topic of much recen t interest for scholars of Classical Greece. mainland, a fitting commemoration of the Athenians' spec­ Philologists have researched the use of Orien talist tropes in tacular and unexpected victories in the Persian ''''ars (Fig. 1). various literary genres,5 while art historians have analyzed The immense, all-marble structure was designed around a snch topics as the depiction of Persians in Greek art,G the colossal statue of Athena Parthenos, depicted by the sculptor reception of Achaemenid material culture in Athens,? and Pheidias fully armed, and with an image of the goddess of representations of the Persian Wars in public Athenian mon­ victory, Nike, alighting on her left hand (Fig, 2). In its archi­ uments.s One hitherto neglected area of inquiry has been the tectural sculpture as well, the Parthenon repeatedly alluded interconnections betl-veen Orientalism and iconoclasm. The to the Greeks' struggle again-st the Persians, for instance, destruction of an enemy's sanctuaries was commonplace in through famous mytholOgical contests: battles between men ancient warfare, and had been practiced by Greeks as well as and centaurs, Athenians and Amazons, Greeks and Trojans, Persians.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip II of Macedon: a Consideration of Books VII IX of Justin's Epitome of Pompeius Trogus
    Durham E-Theses Philip II of Macedon: a consideration of books VII IX of Justin's epitome of Pompeius Trogus Wade, J. S. How to cite: Wade, J. S. (1977) Philip II of Macedon: a consideration of books VII IX of Justin's epitome of Pompeius Trogus, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10215/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. PHILIP II OF MACEDON: A CONSIDERATION OF BOOKS VII - IX OF JUSTIN* S EPITOME OF POMPEIUS TROGUS THESIS SUBMITTED IN APPLICATION FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS - by - J. S. WADE, B. A. DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM OCTOBER 1977 ABSTRACT The aim of this dissertation is two-fold: firstly to examine the career and character of Philip II of Macedon as portrayed in Books VII - IX of Justin's epitome of the Historiae Phillppicae .of Pompeius Trqgus, and to consider to what extent Justin-Trogus (a composite name for the author of the views in the text of Justin) furnishes accurate historical fact, and to what extent he paints a one-sided interpretation of the events, and secondly to identify as far as possible Justin's principles of selection and compression as evidenced in Books VII - IX.
    [Show full text]
  • SOME BOEOTIAN PALMETTE CUPS 29 Palmettes on the Rim Have Sometimes Two Arcs Placed Side by Side to Form the Heart, As on the Tanagra Chevron Cup No
    SOME BOEOTIAN PALMETTECUPS (PLATES I-VIII) O ,F THE numerous Boeotian black-figured cups of the latter part of the fiftl century and the early fourth comparatively few have been published and still fewer have been classified. The majority of them, decorated merely with palmette., and lotuses and the like, are not the sort of material in which one can detect a master hand or trace the influence of a notable craftsman. Yet crude and incompetent as most of them are, it is possible to sort them into groups in which the work of various shops can be differentiated, and often to assign the groups to a definite locality. There are over two hundred and fifty of these cups extant, including two important col- lections, one at Tanagra from local graves, the other at Chaeronea where there are more than a hundred floral kylikes and skyphoi. In the Journtalof Helleuic Studies, vol. XLVI, 1926, pp. 54 f., I published thirty-eight floral kylikes at Tanagra (Schima- tari), that is, all there were in the museum at the time except a few from controlledl excavations, which were awaiting publication by the excavators, and two or three which were in such bad condition that the patterns could not be completely made ott. The Chaeronea collection still awaits publication. Pending the time when a complete study of the material will be possible I propose here to call attention to one or two easily recognizable groups.1 9 Plate I 1 and 2 show a kylix in Reading which belongs to one of the most dis- tinctive and best represented groups of these floral cups.
    [Show full text]
  • HERODOTUS I I I 1 IV I I BOOKS VIII-IX I I I I L I I I I I I 1 I 1 I L I 1 I 1 I I I I L G Translated by I a D
    I I 1 I 1 OEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY I i I 1 I I I m HERODOTUS I i I 1 IV i I BOOKS VIII-IX I i i I l I I I I i i 1 I 1 i l i 1 i 1 I I i I l g Translated by i A D. GODLEY i i I 1 I I iN Complete list of Lock titles can be V*o Jound at the end of each volume the historian HERODOTUS grc-at Greek was born about 484 B.C., at Halicar- nassus in Caria, Asia Minor, when it was subject to the Persians. He travelled in of Asia widely most Minor, Egypt (as as far Assuan), North Africa, Syria, the country north of the Black Sea, and many parts of the Aegean Sea and the mainland of Greece. He lived, it seems, for some time in Athens, and in 443 went with other colonists to the new city Thurii (in he died about South Italy) where 430 B.C. He was 'the prose correlative of the bard, a narrator of the deeds of real men, and a describer of foreign places' (Murray). His famous history of warfare between the Greeks and the Persians has an epic enhances his dignity which delightful style. It includes the rise of the Persian power and an account of the Persian the empire ; description of Egypt fills one book; because Darius attacked Scythia, the geography and customs of that land are also even in the later books on the given ; the Persians attacks of against Greece there are digressions.o All is most entertainingo a After and produces grand unity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Histories
    Place Names Latitude Longitude Numbers of Times Mentioned Adriatic Sea 42.7752864 15.885196 3 Paphos 34.757212 32.406593 1 Oaxos 35.3080415 24.8441326 2 Petra 35.25 26.25 2 Siphnus 35.208535 26.108246 4 Abae 38.5831615 22.929852 5 Abdera 40.93950935 24.9795992 13 Abydos 26.409131 31.91627145 18 Acarnania 38.71765475 21.19036225 2 Achaia 38.10212147 22.22458591 8 Achelous river 38.3388321 21.1067111 3 Acheron river 39.2348296 20.4831346 2 Achilleum 39.914982 26.1511315 1 Achilles 46.5 31.5 1 Pyrene 42.468926 2.866662 1 Adramytteum 39.5023635 26.936321 1 Aegaen Sea 37.44094966 25.85418454 9 Aegina island 37.7409397 23.430141 51 Egyptian sea 31.15802 32.68554 1 Egypt 19.21140877 30.56732963 263 Aeolia 38.84644288 26.95080175 2 Ethiopia 14.125005 38.721522 22 Aetolia 38.51650426 21.75966982 1 Agathyrsi 47.5 27.5 11 Agora 40.513545 26.786353 1 Aegae 38.154879 22.314637 2 Aegaleos Mountain 37.154 21.721 1 Aege 39.978627 23.666064 1 Aegira 38.1297925 22.377887 1 Aegilea island 38.1771519 24.1749085 2 Aegion 38.252707 22.081952 1 Aenea 40.439481 22.879124 2 Aenus 40.7248985 26.085729 2 Aenyra 40.683333 24.65 1 Aesa 40.309275 23.060368 1 Acanthus 40.39975 23.880112 8 Acragas 37.29289215 13.58945448 4 Acrothoum 38.4526062 23.2197021 1 Akrothooi 40.183833 24.34933 1 Alabanda 37.59557847 27.97571613 2 Alalia 42.10240033 9.511828 2 Alopecae 37.95 23.749997 1 Alpeni 38.801852 22.586084 4 Amathus 34.712264 33.13708095 3 Ampelus headland 37.75 26.75 2 Amphicaea 38.642319 22.598214 1 Amphissa 38.518403 22.374172 2 Anagyrous 37.8300155 23.804843 1 Anaphlystus
    [Show full text]
  • RELIGION in HERODOTUS Jon D. Mikalson Although It Is Regularly Ignored, Dismissed, Or Disparaged by Both Ancient and Modern Hist
    CHAPTER EIGHT RELIGION IN HERODOTUS Jon D. Mikalson Although it is regularly ignored, dismissed, or disparaged by both ancient and modern historians, Herodotus explicitly offers also a reli­ gious explanation of the causes and outcome of the Persian inva­ sions. I In 499 BC a small force of Greeks, including Athenians, attacked Sardis, a principal city of the Persian empire, and in the course of the attack they accidently burned down the sanctuary of the goddess Cybebe (S.101- 102.1). When King Darius first heard of it, 'he took a bow, fitted an arrow to it, and shot the arrow into the sky. As he did, he prayed, "Zeus, grant me to take vengeance on the Athenians ... '" (S.lOS). It was the burning of Cybebe's sanc­ tuary that the Persians then used as an excuse for burning sanctu­ aries throughout the lands of hostile Greek cities for the next eighteen years (S.102.l; cf. 6.l0l.3 and 7.8.P).2 These included, after the Ionian Revolt, Apollo's temple and oracle at Didyma, and the sanc­ tuaries of all the revolting Ionian cities and islands of Asia Minor except Samos (6.l9.3, 2S, and 32). Later Datis on his way to Marathon in 490 burned the sanctuaries of Naxos and Eretria (6.96 and 10l.3). And in the second invasion Xerxes destroyed the sanctuaries in twelve Phocian cities, including Apollo's oracle at Abae (8.32.2- 33). Had he had his way, Xerxes would have had Delphi destroyed too (8.3S- 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Defense and Strategy Among the Upland Peoples of the Classical Greek World 490-362 Bc
    DEFENSE AND STRATEGY AMONG THE UPLAND PEOPLES OF THE CLASSICAL GREEK WORLD 490-362 BC A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by David Andrew Blome May 2015 © 2015 David Andrew Blome DEFENSE AND STRATEGY AMONG THE UPLAND PEOPLES OF THE CLASSICAL GREEK WORLD 490-362 BC David Blome, PhD Cornell University 2015 This dissertation analyzes four defenses of a Greek upland ethnos (“people,” “nation,” “tribe”) against a large-scale invasion from the lowlands ca.490-362 BC. Its central argument is that the upland peoples of Phocis, Aetolia, Acarnania, and Arcadia maintained defensive strategies that enabled wide-scale, sophisticated actions in response to external aggression; however, their collective success did not depend on the existence of a central, federal government. To make this argument, individual chapters draw on the insights of archaeological, topographical, and ethnographic research to reevaluate the one-sided ancient narratives that document the encounters under consideration. The defensive capabilities brought to light in the present study challenge two prevailing paradigms in ancient Greek scholarship beyond the polis (“city-state”). Beyond-the-polis scholarship has convincingly overturned the conventional view of ethnē as atavistic tribal states, emphasizing instead the diversity of social and political organization that developed outside of the Greek polis. But at the same time, this research has emphasized the act of federation as a key turning point in the socio- political development of ethnē, and downplayed the role of collective violence in the shaping of upland polities. In contrast, this dissertation shows that upland Greeks constituted well- organized, efficient, and effective polities that were thoroughly adapted to their respective geopolitical contexts, but without formal institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX Afrin(River},Ll4 Abae,6L Achaeans,55,74,86,L42,L66,233 N.L5
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-20008-0 - The Seleucid Army: Organization and Tactics in the Great Campaigns Bezalel Bar-kochva Index More information INDEX Afrin(river},ll4 135-8,142,155,161,170-5,180, Abae,6l 200,203,205,206 Achaeans,55,74,86,l42,l66,233 Antiochus the Elder(son of n.l5 Antiochus 111),148,152,155 Achaeus,l8,3l,41-2,94,208 Antiochus IV,13,14,56,80,83,85, Acre,128,222 n.84,256 n.7 87,89,118,149,151,155,226 n.103 Adasa,27,184,194-5,268 n.2 Antiochus V,148,174,257 n.9 adekateutoi,57-8 Antiochus Vl1(Sidetes) ,9-11,30, Aegae,36 85-7,100 Aegean(aea},16,l58,l63 Antiochus Vlll(Grypus},97 Aetolians,19,30,5l,loo,146,148, Antiochus Hierax,86,218 n.36 150,153-4,156-8,160 Antipater,30 Agathoc1es ,111 Apollonia,Apollonitis, 117,119 ag~ma,21,33,42,58-9,64-5,67-75, apoikia,35 134,166,168-70,180,202 aposkeu~,8,100-2,109,145,153, Agrianians,50,221 n.72 162,200,206 akontists,50,108,119,251 n.11 Arabs,49,l36 akra,261 n.4 Arb~ 1,188-91 Akra(Jerusa1em} ,128,175 archers,55,108-9,126,144,155, akrO~hYlakitai,32 161,167,172,251 n.11,264 n.29 alae Latin) ,165-8,170-1 Ardys,88 A1cimos,192 Arethusa,27 a1ertness,97-9,100 argyraspides,9,20-1,40-1,46.58-62, Alexander(a~ of),1,7,10,34-5, 64-6,73,88,90,135-7,140,161-2,166 54-5,58-9,63-4,67,72,74,96, !68-9,172,202-3,207 n.8, 213n.5 138,148,205-6 Ar~.arathes ,48,51 A1exandria(ste1ae of) ,Ill armour(breastp1ates,cuirass,chain Amanus,l12,2oo,206 mai1,sca1e armour) ,54-6,59,66, ambush,142,179,209 n.21 74-5,144-5,180-1 Ammaus,13,l00,267 n.15 Arsaces,l42 Amphipo1is(Kacedon) ,55,97,235 artillery,75,161,261
    [Show full text]