DOCSLIB.ORG

Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son, Lives and Afterlives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son, Lives and Afterlives PHILIP II AND ALEXANDER THE GREAT This page intentionally left blank Philip II and Alexander the Great Father and Son, Lives and Afterlives Edited by ELIZABETH CARNEY and DANIEL OGDEN 2010 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Philip II and Alexander the Great : father and son, lives and afterlives/ edited by Elizabeth Carney and Daniel Ogden. p. cm. A selection from the papers presented at an international symposium, “Philip II and Alexander III: Father, Son and Dunasteia,” held April 3-5, 2008, at Clemson University, in South Carolina. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-973815-1 1. Philip II, King of Macedonia, 382–336 B.C.—Congresses. 2. Alexander, the Great, 356-323 B.C.—Congresses. 3. Greece—History—Macedonian Expansion, 359–323 B.C.—Congresses. 4. Greece—History—Macedonian Hegemony, 323–281 B.C.—Congresses. I. Carney, Elizabeth Donnelly, 1947–II. Ogden, Daniel. DF233.P476 2010 938′.070922—dc22 [B] 2009032100 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper to William Aarnes and Eriko Ogden This page intentionally left blank Preface n July of 1997, A. B. Bosworth and E. B. Baynham convened an Iinternational symposium on Alexander the Great at the University of Newcastle (NSW, Australia). The conveners then edited a selection of papers from the conference, Alexander the Great in Fact and Fic- tion, published by Oxford University Press in 2000. This conference and publication became a model for what has become a continuing series of symposia focusing on the world and impact of Alexander and involving junior and senior scholars from a variety of academic disciplines, undergraduates and graduates, and the general public. Each symposium has produced a publication. In January 2002, Waldemar Heckel convened a symposium at University of Calgary; he and Lawrence Tritle then edited a collection derived from that meeting, Crossroads of History: The Age of Alexander, published in 2003. In January of 2005, Professor Heckel again generously spon- sored a symposium; he, Lawrence Tritle, and Pat Wheatley edited a collection derived from the second Calgary symposium, Alexander’s Empire: Formulation to Decay, published in 2007. In that same year, Pat Wheatley hosted a conference at the University of Otago, New Zealand. He and Robert Hannah coedited a collection of papers rel- ated to that meeting; Alexander and His Successors: Essays from the Antipodes that Regina Books published in May of 2009. So too the present collection of articles has its origin in an international sympo- sium, “Philip II and Alexander III: Father, Son and Dunasteia,” held April 3–5, 2008, at Clemson University in South Carolina. The cur- rent manuscript constitutes a selection from the papers delivered at the symposium, though many of these papers now differ markedly from their earlier oral versions. As we write, another Alexander Sym- posium, convened by Victor Alonso Troncoso, is planned for Septem- ber 2010 at Universidad de La Coruña, Spain. Each symposium has differed a bit from the others in focus, or composition, or organization but all have provided invaluable exper- ience for those interested in the world of Alexander and ancient Macedonia, the rare opportunity for specialists ordinarily scattered around the world to talk at length, to bounce ideas off each other, and viii PREFACE for those newly involved in the fi eld to meet and speak to those who have worked in it for many years. The varying venues have added a piquant element to an already rich experience. We remember a lovely afternoon spent wandering the wine country of New South Wales with a somewhat directionally challenged but charming bus driver, a group of Alexander scholars huddled together for warmth as they watched a demonstration of the use of a sarissa while Calgary citizens passing by on a Saturday morning gawked and threatened to cause accidents, and an evening of barbecue and blue grass music (but, unfortunately, no strong drink) in a South Carolina restaurant deco- rated with somewhat obscure football memorabilia. The symposium could not have happened without generous fi nan- cial support from four different Clemson University entities: the Department of History and Geography; the College of Art, Architec- ture, and Humanities; the Offi ce of Research and Economic Develop- ment; and the Vending Machine Fund. The staff of the University Madren conference Center/Martin Inn offered invaluable help. Jeannie Davis, Communications Director for the college, designed wonderful posters for the conference. Sheri Stanley, history department adminis- trative assistant, patiently led me through the wilds of state fi nancing, and our administrative specialist, Trish Nigro, worked tirelessly to make sure the minutiae of arrangements worked. Graduate and under- graduate history students helped in many ways, particularly with transport. My department chair, Thomas Kuehn, and my colleagues in the history department did a great deal of work behind the scenes. My husband, William Aarnes, was a wonderful host to thirty-fi ve Alexander scholars and provided back-up service as a designated driver. I would like to thank our contributors for their hard work and will- ingness to make deadlines. I am grateful to Stefan Vranka and Oxford University Press for the speed with which this project has proceeded. Above all, I am in debt to my experienced and amazingly effi cient coeditor, Daniel Ogden. Elizabeth Carney Contents Contributors, xi Abbreviations, xv Introduction, xix Part I Father, Son, and Court 1 The “Pixodarus Affair” Reconsidered Again, 3 Stephen Ruzicka 2 The Bearded King and the Beardless Hero: From Philip II to Alexander the Great, 13 Víctor Alonso Troncoso 3 In the Shadow of His Father: Alexander, Hermolaus, and the Legend of Philip, 25 Sabine Müller 4 Philip’s Eurydice in the Philippeum at Olympia, 33 Olga Palagia 5 Putting Women in Their Place: Women in Public under Philip II and Alexander III and the Last Argeads, 43 Elizabeth Carney 6 The Symposia of Philip II and Alexander III of Macedon: The View from Greece, 55 Frances Pownall Part II Philip and Alexander at War 7 Consensus Strategies under Philip and Alexander: The Revenge Theme, 69 Giuseppe Squillace 8 The Asthetairoi: Macedonia’s Hoplites, 81 Edward M. Anson 9 The Argeads and the Phalanx, 91 A. B. Bosworth x CONTENTS 10 Scythed Chariots at Gaugamela: A Case Study, 103 Waldemar Heckel, Carolyn Willekes, Graham Wrightson Part III After Philip and Alexander: Legacy and Legitimation 11 Cassander and the Legacy of Philip II and Alexander III in Diodorus’ Library, 113 Franca Landucci Gattinoni 12 The Role of the Argeadai in the Legitimation of the Ptolemaic Dynasty: Rhetoric and Practice, 123 Margarita Lianou 13 Hieronymus of Cardia: Causation and Bias from Alexander to His Successors, 135 Joseph Roisman Part IV Reception of Father and Son 14 Argead Dunasteia during the Reigns of Philip II and Alexander III: Aristotle Reconsidered, 151 William S. Greenwalt 15 “Worldwide Empire” versus “Glorious Enterprise”: Diodorus and Justin on Philip II and Alexander the Great, 165 Ian Worthington 16 “You Should Never Meet Your Heroes . .”: Growing Up with Alexander, the Valerius Maximus Way, 175 Diana Spencer 17 His Son’s Father? Philip II in the Second Sophistic, 193 Sulochana R. Asirvatham 18 Alexander in the Underworld, 205 Daniel Ogden 19 “And Your Father Sees You”: Paternity in Alexander (2004), 217 Gideon Nisbet Notes, 233 Bibliography, 305 Index, 339 Contributors Edward M. Anson is Professor of History in the University of Arkan- sas at Little Rock, Department of History, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 South University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA; [email protected]. Sulochana R. Asirvatham is Associate Professor of Classics and Gen- eral Humanities at Montclair State University, Montclair State Uni- versity, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA; sulochana. [email protected]. A. B. Bosworth is Emeritus Professor of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Western Australia and currently Professor of Ancient History at Macquarie University, NSW, and Conjoint Professor of Classics at the University of Newcastle, NSW, Department of Ancient History, W6A 540, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia; [email protected]. Elizabeth Carney is Professor of Ancient History and Carol K. Brown Scholar in Humanities at Clemson University, Department of History, Hardin Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0527, USA; [email protected]. Franca Landucci Gattinoni is Associate Professor of Greek History at the Catholic University of Milan, Catholic University of Milan, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123, Milan, Italy; [email protected]. William S. Greenwalt is Professor of Classics at Santa Clara Univer- sity, Department of Classics, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053, USA; [email protected]. Waldemar Heckel is Professor of Ancient History at the University of Calgary, Department of Greek and Roman Studies, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. xii CONTRIBUTORS Margarita Lianou is a PhD candidate in Ancient History at the Uni- versity of St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • T C K a P R (E F C Bc): C P R
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 23 (2016): 25–49 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.16.002.5821 www.ejournals.eu/electrum T C K A P R (E F C BC): C P R S1 Christian Körner Universität Bern For Andreas Mehl, with deep gratitude Abstract: At the end of the eighth century, Cyprus came under Assyrian control. For the follow- ing four centuries, the Cypriot monarchs were confronted with the power of the Near Eastern empires. This essay focuses on the relations between the Cypriot kings and the Near Eastern Great Kings from the eighth to the fourth century BC. To understand these relations, two theoretical concepts are applied: the centre-periphery model and the concept of suzerainty. From the central perspective of the Assyrian and Persian empires, Cyprus was situated on the western periphery. Therefore, the local governing traditions were respected by the Assyrian and Persian masters, as long as the petty kings fulfi lled their duties by paying tributes and providing military support when requested to do so. The personal relationship between the Cypriot kings and their masters can best be described as one of suzerainty, where the rulers submitted to a superior ruler, but still retained some autonomy. This relationship was far from being stable, which could lead to manifold mis- understandings between centre and periphery. In this essay, the ways in which suzerainty worked are discussed using several examples of the relations between Cypriot kings and their masters. Key words: Assyria, Persia, Cyprus, Cypriot kings. At the end of the fourth century BC, all the Cypriot kingdoms vanished during the wars of Alexander’s successors Ptolemy and Antigonus, who struggled for control of the is- land.
    [Show full text]
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion Milns, R D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1966; 7, 2; Proquest Pg
    Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion Milns, R D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1966; 7, 2; ProQuest pg. 159 Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion R. D. Milns SOME TIME between the battle of Gaugamela and the battle of A the Hydaspes the number of battalions in the Macedonian phalanx was raised from six to seven.1 This much is clear; what is not certain is when the new formation came into being. Berve2 believes that the introduction took place at Susa in 331 B.C. He bases his belief on two facts: (a) the arrival of 6,000 Macedonian infantry and 500 Macedonian cavalry under Amyntas, son of Andromenes, when the King was either near or at Susa;3 (b) the appearance of Philotas (not the son of Parmenion) as a battalion leader shortly afterwards at the Persian Gates.4 Tarn, in his discussion of the phalanx,5 believes that the seventh battalion was not created until 328/7, when Alexander was at Bactra, the new battalion being that of Cleitus "the White".6 Berve is re­ jected on the grounds: (a) that Arrian (3.16.11) says that Amyntas' reinforcements were "inserted into the existing (six) battalions KC1:TCt. e8vr(; (b) that Philotas has in fact taken over the command of Perdiccas' battalion, Perdiccas having been "promoted to the Staff ... doubtless after the battle" (i.e. Gaugamela).7 The seventh battalion was formed, he believes, from reinforcements from Macedonia who reached Alexander at Nautaca.8 Now all of Tarn's arguments are open to objection; and I shall treat them in the order they are presented above.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Strutture Difensive Delle Colonie Greche Di Sicilia
    Il presente Volume si propone di approfondire la conoscenza storica, tipologica e materica delle Francesca Scalisi strutture difensive presenti nei maggiori siti archeologici siciliani di fondazione greca, premessa in- dispensabile per un qualsiasi tipo di intervento di recupero e fruizione. Le fortificazioni sono dei monumenti fortemente emblematici per tipologia e dimensione e rappresentano, per certi versi, il volto che un insediamento offriva a chi si apprestava ad entrarvi, essendo la città antica modellata nel suo aspetto esteriore dalle mura difensive. Questa analisi sistematica sulle fortificazioni evidenzia LE STRUTTURE DIFENSIVE DELLE importanti contenuti che coinvolgono i settori scientifici relativi alle tecnologie costruttive e alle tecniche esecutive. La tessitura muraria, infatti, ci fornisce un ricco e variegato repertorio tecnologico in uso tra i secoli VII ed il IV a.C., utile per comprendere la pratica del fare architettura. COLONIE GRECHE DI SICILIA Il Volume affronta, innanzitutto, il tema della colonizzazione greca in Sicilia, in quanto la nascita Storia, tipologia, materiali delle fortificazioni è strettaente correlata alla necessità di difendersi dalle popolazioni indigene, e indaga sulle relazioni esistenti fra fortificazioni e tipologie insediative, soffermandosi, in seguito ad analizzare i vari subsistemi (fondazioni, muri, coronamenti, smaltimento delle acque) e compo- nenti (porte e torri) che costituiscono la struttura di un sistema difensivo. Segue l’elencazione di una serie di casi di studio, individuati secondo criteri di consistenza qualitativa e quantitativa delle tessiture murarie: allo studio storico, topografico e urbanistico della colonia individuata, fa seguito l’analisi dettagliata dei sistemi difensivi di ogni sito, dal cui raffronto si evidenziano, di volta in volta, le costanti e le varianti costruttive.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplied Through the Parthians) from the 1St Century BC, Even Though the Romans Thought Silk Was Obtained from Trees
    Chinese Silk in the Roman Empire Trade with the Roman Empire followed soon, confirmed by the Roman craze for Chinese silk (supplied through the Parthians) from the 1st century BC, even though the Romans thought silk was obtained from trees: The Seres (Chinese), are famous for the woolen substance obtained from their forests; after a soaking in water they comb off the white down of the leaves... So manifold is the labor employed, and so distant is the region of the globe drawn upon, to enable the Roman maiden to flaunt transparent clothing in public. -(Pliny the Elder (23- 79, The Natural History) The Senate issued, in vain, several edicts to prohibit the wearing of silk, on economic and moral grounds: the importation of Chinese silk caused a huge outflow of gold, and silk clothes were considered to be decadent and immoral: I can see clothes of silk, if materials that do not hide the body, nor even one's decency, can be called clothes... Wretched flocks of maids labour so that the adulteress may be visible through her thin dress, so that her husband has no more acquaintance than any outsider or foreigner with his wife's body. -(Seneca the Younger (c. 3 BCE- 65 CE, Declamations Vol. I) The Roman historian Florus also describes the visit of numerous envoys, included Seres (perhaps the Chinese), to the first Roman Emperor Augustus, who reigned between 27 BCE and 14 CE: Even the rest of the nations of the world which were not subject to the imperial sway were sensible of its grandeur, and looked with reverence to the Roman people, the great conqueror of nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phocian Betrayal at Thermopylae
    historia 68, 2019/4, 413–435 DOI 10.25162/historia-2019-0022 Jeffrey Rop The Phocian Betrayal at Thermopylae Abstract: This article makes three arguments regarding the Battle of Thermopylae. First, that the discovery of the Anopaea path was not dependent upon Ephialtes, but that the Persians were aware of it at their arrival and planned their attacks at Thermopylae, Artemisium, and against the Phocians accordingly. Second, that Herodotus’ claims that the failure of the Pho- cians was due to surprise, confusion, and incompetence are not convincing. And third, that the best explanation for the Phocian behavior is that they were from Delphi and betrayed their allies as part of a bid to restore local control over the sanctuary. Keywords: Thermopylae – Artemisium – Delphi – Phocis – Medism – Anopaea The courageous sacrifice of Leonidas and the Spartans is perhaps the central theme of Herodotus’ narrative and of many popular retellings of the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BCE. Even as modern historians are appropriately more critical of this heroizing impulse, they have tended to focus their attention on issues that might explain why Leo- nidas and his men fought to the death. These include discussion of the broader strategic and tactical importance of Thermopylae, the inter-relationship and chronology of the Greek defense of the pass and the naval campaign at Artemisium, the actual number of Greeks who served under Leonidas and whether it was sufficient to hold the position, and so on. While this article inevitably touches upon some of these same topics, its main purpose is to reconsider the decisive yet often overlooked moment of the battle: the failure of the 1,000 Phocians on the Anopaea path.
    [Show full text]
  • The Court of Alexander the Great As Social System
    Originalveröffentlichung in Waldemar Heckel/Lawrence Tritle (Hg.), Alexander the Great. A New History, Malden, Mass. u.a. 2009, S. 83-98 5 The Court of Alexander the Great as Social System Gregor Weber In his discussion of events that followed Alexander ’s march through Hyrcania (summer 330), Plutarch gives a succinct summary of the king ’s conduct and reports the clash of his closest friends, Hephaestion and Craterus (Alex. 47.5.9-11).1 The passage belongs in the context of Alexander ’s adoption of the traditions and trap ­ pings of the dead Persian Great King (Fredricksmeyer 2000; Brosius 2003a), although the conflict between the two generals dates to the time of the Indian campaign (probably 326). It reveals not only that Alexander was subtly in tune with the atti­ tudes of his closest friends, but also that his changes elicited varied responses from the members of his circle. Their relationships with each other were based on rivalry, something Alexander - as Plutarch ’s wording suggests - actively encouraged. But it is also reported that Alexander made an effort to bring about a lasting reconcili ­ ation of the two friends, who had attacked each other with swords, and drawn their respective troops into the fray. To do so, he had to marshal “all his resources ” (Hamilton 1969; 128-31) from gestures of affection to death threats. These circumstances invite the question: what was the structural relevance of such an episode beyond the mutual antagonism of Hephaestion and Craterus? For these were not minor protagonists, but rather men of the upper echelon of the new Macedonian-Persian empire, with whose help Alexander had advanced his con ­ quest ever further and exercised his power (Berve nos.
    [Show full text]
  • (1988) 116–118 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt Gmbh, Bonn
    E. BADIAN TWO POSTSCRIPTS ON THE MARRIAGE OF PHILA AND BALACRUS aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 73 (1988) 116–118 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 116 TWO POSTSCRIPTS ON THE MARRIAGE OF PHILA AND BALACRUS Waldemar Heckel (ZPE 70,1987,161-2) has done a service to prosopography of Alexander and the Diadochoi by his acute demonstration that the marriage of Phila and Balacrus, Alexander's satrap of Cilicia, must be accepted as historical fact. In view of the inadequacy of our source for the connection (the writer of romance, Antonius Diogenes, as recorded by Photius), it had been inconclusively discussed ever since Droysen first accepted it and then changed his mind about it.1) The dedication by an Antipater son of "Balagros" indeed establishes the fact. There is perhaps slight further confirmation for the identification discovered by Heckel in the spelling of "Balagros": the inscription coincides with Photius in this detail, and the spelling is a very rare variant.2) a.) Heckel should not, however, be followed in his acceptance of the authenticity of the letter cited by the Greek novelist. His statement that Photius "preserves, on the testimony of Antonius Diogenes, the details of a letter ..." is followed by his use of the letter in order to show that Phila cannot have been with her husband when he cook over the satrapy of Cilicia, since he still wrote to her from Tyre. In fact, there cannot be any doubt that the letter is fictitious: it pro- vides the setting for Diogenes' romance and the details are historically worthless.
    [Show full text]