A Case Study of Humanitarian Action and the Syria Conflict
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Planning from the Future Component 2. The Contemporary Humanitarian Landscape: Malaise, Blockages and Game Changers No End in Sight: A Case Study of Humanitarian Action and the Syria Conflict Kimberly Howe January 2016 Table of Contents Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Planning from the Future—the Project ....................................................................................... 5 Component 2—the Humanitarian Landscape Today .................................................................. 6 Introduction to the Case Study: The Syria Crisis ............................................................................ 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 7 Background to the Conflict ............................................................................................................. 8 Stakeholder Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 9 Conflict and Political Actors ....................................................................................................... 9 Humanitarian Actors ................................................................................................................. 11 Donors from the West and the Rest ...................................................................................... 11 LNGOs, INGOs, and the United Nations ............................................................................. 12 Major Themes and Defining Characteristics ................................................................................ 14 The Conflict Environment ........................................................................................................ 14 Protection .................................................................................................................................. 16 The Politics of Engagement and Access, Humanitarian Principles in Practice ........................ 18 Inside Government-Controlled Areas ................................................................................... 19 Cross-Border Operations ...................................................................................................... 21 Remote Management ................................................................................................................ 23 Donor Influence ........................................................................................................................ 25 The West and Cash ............................................................................................................... 25 Non-Western Donors ............................................................................................................ 26 Syrian Local Organizations and Partnerships with Western and Non-Western Donors ...... 26 Humanitarian Systems and the “Whole of Syria” Approach .................................................... 27 Working Relationships, Fragmentation, and (Mis) Trust ......................................................... 30 The Refugee Response .............................................................................................................. 32 Turkey ................................................................................................................................... 32 Jordan .................................................................................................................................... 33 Lebanon ................................................................................................................................. 34 Key Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 36 Conflict and Protection ............................................................................................................. 36 The System ................................................................................................................................ 37 Humanitarian Operations .......................................................................................................... 38 Implications ............................................................................................................................... 40 References ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Notes ............................................................................................................................................. 47 Acronyms 3RP Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan CCCM Camp Coordination and Camp Management CSO civil society organization DFID Department for International Development, UK Government DTO designated terrorist organization ECHO European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office EU European Union FIC Feinstein International Center at Tufts University FSA Free Syria Army GoJ Government of Jordan GoL Government of Lebanon GoS Government of Syria GoT Government of Turkey HC Humanitarian Coordinator HCT Humanitarian Country Team HNO Humanitarian Needs Overview HPF Humanitarian Pooled Fund HPG Humanitarian Policy Group IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee ICRC International Committee for the Red Cross/Red Crescent IDP internally displaced person IHL International Humanitarian Law INGO international NGO ISCCG inter sector/cluster coordination group ISIS Daesh or the Islamic State LNGO local NGO M&E monitoring and evaluation NFIs non-food items NGO non-governmental organization OCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs ODI Overseas Development Institute OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights PFF Planning for the Future PKK Kurdistan Worker’s Party PYD Democratic Union Party R2P responsibility to protect RHC Regional Humanitarian Coordinator SAMS Syrian American Medical Society SARC Syrian Arab Red Crescent SGBV sexual and gender-based violence SHARP Syria Humanitarian Assistance Response Plan SIG Syrian Interim Government SIMAWG Syria Information Management and Assessment Working Group SNC Syrian National Council SOC Syrian Opposition Coalition SRP Syria Response Plan SSG strategic steering group TPM Third Party Monitoring TPS temporary protective status UAE United Arab Emirates UK United Kingdom UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Program UNHCR United Nations High Commission for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Emergency Fund UNRWA United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinians in the Near East UNSC United Nations Security Council US United States USAID United States Agency for International Development USG United States Government WASH water and sanitation WFP World Food Program WoS Whole of Syria YPG Kurdish People’s Protection Units Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Max Marder for his extensive literature review and analysis on the humanitarian response to the Syria crisis. She also thanks Dan Maxwell and Antonio Donini for their support and (tireless) encouragement for refinement. An extra thank you to Antonio for his insights on the closing sections of this paper. 4 Abstract As part of a larger research project—Planning from the Future—which examines the past, present, and future of humanitarian action globally, this case study identifies the main blockages and game changers in the humanitarian response to the Syria crisis. Findings are based on reports, news sources, and academic writings, as well as key informant interviews with 52 representatives of donor countries, the United Nations, international NGOs and Syrian local organizations working inside Syria, cross-border, and within neighboring countries. The humanitarian system has largely failed in Syria. The scale of the conflict and humanitarian need constitute one of the largest crises of our time, and only a fraction of humanitarian needs are currently met by the system. Humanitarian action has been used as a fig leaf for political inaction and has been highly politicized and influenced by donor interests and political preferences, clashing with the application of first-order humanitarian principles. Meaningful protection continues to remain elusive and humanitarian leadership has been weak while mistrust within and between organizations runs high. Humanitarian actors are trapped by their mandates, and donors are risk averse. As a result, interventions are largely driven by what agencies can do, rather than what is needed. Those in the most need—the besieged, civilians under ISIS control, Palestinians—are the least served. Gulf countries, despite their presence and influence, are largely excluded from the Western-driven humanitarian systems, as are Syrian organizations, which are the primary humanitarian actors on the ground. Extreme insecurity and GoS restrictions have led nearly all humanitarian operations to follow remote management models. The middle-income status of neighboring countries has allowed for creative programming